Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Altina McAlterson
TRUE TEA BAGGERS
427
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 22:35:00 -
[31] - Quote
Winscar Shinobi wrote:Sloth9230 wrote:Commercially Released wrote:Sloth9230 wrote:You guys didn't buy from CCP, you bought from Sony... who reserves the right to change their Terms of Service without telling you.
Or you could buy from Gamestop, I believe they have yet to fix the item's description. Changing terms for new sales does not change terms of sales already made. They didn't change the term on the sale, they changed the terms on the product. It still doesn't change the terms of your product after the fact. Point in case: I bought an apple iPhone 4 on release and got a warranty with it. That warranty covered water damage. About 7 months later they changed the terms and removed water damage coverage. About a year later I dropped my phone in my horses water tub. Apple refused to replace my phone because they didn't cover water damage anymore. I sued them, and got a new iPhone 4 and court costs paid. Why? Because WHEN YOU BUY THE ITEM YOU AGREE TO THE TERMS. If the terms change, no matter how long after, the terms you agreed to at point of purchase remain the same. And trust me, apples legal department can run circles around CCPs.
It's "case in point" and that's not the same thing as this. That was a warranty, not a product.
|
Commercially Released
Sanmatar Kelkoons Minmatar Republic
1
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 22:38:00 -
[32] - Quote
Altina McAlterson wrote:Winscar Shinobi wrote:Sloth9230 wrote:Commercially Released wrote:Sloth9230 wrote:You guys didn't buy from CCP, you bought from Sony... who reserves the right to change their Terms of Service without telling you.
Or you could buy from Gamestop, I believe they have yet to fix the item's description. Changing terms for new sales does not change terms of sales already made. They didn't change the term on the sale, they changed the terms on the product. It still doesn't change the terms of your product after the fact. Point in case: I bought an apple iPhone 4 on release and got a warranty with it. That warranty covered water damage. About 7 months later they changed the terms and removed water damage coverage. About a year later I dropped my phone in my horses water tub. Apple refused to replace my phone because they didn't cover water damage anymore. I sued them, and got a new iPhone 4 and court costs paid. Why? Because WHEN YOU BUY THE ITEM YOU AGREE TO THE TERMS. If the terms change, no matter how long after, the terms you agreed to at point of purchase remain the same. And trust me, apples legal department can run circles around CCPs. It's "case in point" and that's not the same thing as this. That was a warranty, not a product.
Legally speaking, a warranty is a type of product. |
Commercially Released
Sanmatar Kelkoons Minmatar Republic
1
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 22:39:00 -
[33] - Quote
Sete Clifton wrote:Personally, I don't think it's worth fighting over. That being said, if you want a refund and are willing to accept a potential complete character/SP wipe (for everyone), then I have no reason to argue.
Question, if the community had a choice between a total reset for everyone and an AUR reset for everyone, why would they pick the total reset? How does CCP honoring their agreement hurt anyone? |
Kane Fyea
BetaMax. CRONOS.
111
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 22:41:00 -
[34] - Quote
How about not pay money for an unfinished product. |
Hauker Due
Rubber Chicken Bombers
27
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 22:43:00 -
[35] - Quote
Maken Tosch wrote:Mithridates VI wrote:Why should people who bought the merc pack have to choose which one of CCP's promises get kept to them?
One way they are put at a disadvantage to players who CCP didn't make the agreement with, greatly in excess of value of this AUR, the other they lose out on a purchase they made. Can you come up with a better solution? A solution that satisfies both sides.
While there will be a mix of how people ran boosters the solution is simple.
CCP should take away the extra .5 SP players have made with boosters. Players keep the Pre-booster SP. CCP refunds ALL purchases.
It's not perfect, but CCP screwed up so there is no perfect solution. This way contractually fulfills the refund and keeps us from all getting completely reset back to 0 because of a few that feel CCP owes them.
EXAMPLE
Player A - 4 Million SP -Never purchased AUR/Merc Packs (therefore never ran boosters)
Player B - 6 Million SP -Purchased AUR/Merc Packs (ran both passive and active hense he made 1.5x player A)
SOLUTION
1. Take away the extra .5 SP that player B has made off of boosters = 2 million in this example 2. Refund player B's AUR/Merc Packs 2. Give both player A and B the ability to respec their SP any way they want
i hope this is clear
Both player A and B would be given 4 Million SP to respec and player B would have AUR/Merc Pack refunded
|
Altina McAlterson
TRUE TEA BAGGERS
427
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 22:45:00 -
[36] - Quote
Commercially Released wrote:
Legally speaking, a warranty is a type of product.
Poor wording on my part, forgot to include the rest of my point. The Warranty includes a clause that the terms may change and the consumer agrees to that. A separate agreement would be required for the product. |
Commercially Released
Sanmatar Kelkoons Minmatar Republic
1
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 22:46:00 -
[37] - Quote
Altina McAlterson wrote:Commercially Released wrote:
Legally speaking, a warranty is a type of product.
Poor wording on my part, forgot to include the rest of my point. The Warranty includes a clause that the terms may change and the consumer agrees to that. A separate agreement would be required for the product.
Usually a change that the customer finds unacceptable results in a refund and termination of the contract. Both sides have to agree to the change or the sale is reversed. |
Winscar Shinobi
Better Hide R Die
115
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 22:47:00 -
[38] - Quote
Altina McAlterson wrote:Winscar Shinobi wrote:Sloth9230 wrote:Commercially Released wrote:Sloth9230 wrote:You guys didn't buy from CCP, you bought from Sony... who reserves the right to change their Terms of Service without telling you.
Or you could buy from Gamestop, I believe they have yet to fix the item's description. Changing terms for new sales does not change terms of sales already made. They didn't change the term on the sale, they changed the terms on the product. It still doesn't change the terms of your product after the fact. Point in case: I bought an apple iPhone 4 on release and got a warranty with it. That warranty covered water damage. About 7 months later they changed the terms and removed water damage coverage. About a year later I dropped my phone in my horses water tub. Apple refused to replace my phone because they didn't cover water damage anymore. I sued them, and got a new iPhone 4 and court costs paid. Why? Because WHEN YOU BUY THE ITEM YOU AGREE TO THE TERMS. If the terms change, no matter how long after, the terms you agreed to at point of purchase remain the same. And trust me, apples legal department can run circles around CCPs. It's "case in point" and that's not the same thing as this. That was a warranty, not a product. 1. I know what I said.
2. A warranty is a product.
|
Sete Clifton
PSU GHOST SYNDICATE
78
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 23:03:00 -
[39] - Quote
Commercially Released wrote:Sete Clifton wrote:Personally, I don't think it's worth fighting over. That being said, if you want a refund and are willing to accept a potential complete character/SP wipe (for everyone), then I have no reason to argue. Question, if the community had a choice between a total reset for everyone and an AUR reset for everyone, why would they pick the total reset? How does CCP honoring their agreement hurt anyone?
While I personally would be able to accept an AUR only reset, it would cause a problem because not everyone has bought it. The issue is that AUR is both directly (boosters) and indirectly (items) tied to SP and ISK gains. So, people who get their AUR refunded would essentially be getting free SP/items compared to people who have have little to nothing in AUR. It would effectively have made AUR an investment with 100% interest and those who didn't "invest" in it would be losing out. The more AUR/merc packs you bought, the more of an advantage you be getting (as everything is essentially multiplied by two). So the only fair option would be to reset everything. |
First Prophet
Matari Combat Research and Manufacture Inc.
45
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 23:30:00 -
[40] - Quote
ReGnUM Public Relations wrote:Just Reset Everything YES. DO IT. |
|
Maken Tosch
Planetary Response Organisation Test Friends Please Ignore
1807
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 23:49:00 -
[41] - Quote
Hauker Due wrote:Maken Tosch wrote:Mithridates VI wrote:Why should people who bought the merc pack have to choose which one of CCP's promises get kept to them?
One way they are put at a disadvantage to players who CCP didn't make the agreement with, greatly in excess of value of this AUR, the other they lose out on a purchase they made. Can you come up with a better solution? A solution that satisfies both sides. While there will be a mix of how people ran boosters the solution is simple. CCP should take away the extra .5 SP players have made with boosters. Players keep the Pre-booster SP. CCP refunds ALL purchases. It's not perfect, but CCP screwed up so there is no perfect solution. This way contractually fulfills the refund and keeps us from all getting completely reset back to 0 because of a few that feel CCP owes them. EXAMPLE Player A - 4 Million SP -Never purchased AUR/Merc Packs (therefore never ran boosters) Player B - 6 Million SP -Purchased AUR/Merc Packs (ran both passive and active hense he made 1.5x player A) SOLUTION 1. Take away the extra .5 SP that player B has made off of boosters = 2 million in this example 2. Refund player B's AUR/Merc Packs 2. Give both player A and B the ability to respec their SP any way they want i hope this is clear Both player A and B would be given 4 Million SP to respec and player B would have AUR/Merc Pack refunded
This actually seems logical and well thought out. I'll update my OP to include this. |
Skihids
The Tritan Industries
1109
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 00:25:00 -
[42] - Quote
Commercially Released wrote:Skihids wrote:I approve.
The folks who want a refund but also want to keep everything they bought with it have more greed than logic.
Any refund would be contingent upon surrendering the product.
Who would consider asking for a refund on a car and demanding that they get to keep it? I mean really? Who in their right mind thinks a business can operate this way?
So if someone wants to force a refund, let them. But then they return everything they purchased with that Aurum. That means a wipe of all boosted SP and all BPO's and any reminding BPC's. Greed huh? Who is the greedy one in truth? The person who wants all of what they paid for? Or the person who wants another person not to get what they paid for? It doesn't hurt you at all, this is entirely an issue between early adopters (and current gamestop customers) and CCP. At the end of the day there are plenty who can afford to buy more anyway. This is only about making a few people feel better because they had to pay more to do it. Irony alert, people are promoting pay to win as a way to preserve fairness!
I am an early adopter, having been here from early closed beta.
What I don't want is to be dictated to by another early adopter. I bought bonus SP with Aurum and my time, and I really don't want to be forced to spend both all over again. Unless you can somehow refund all the time I spent making my cap for several weeks? No? I didn't think so.
I've ground up from scratch five times now and as everyone is fond of pointing out the current build is not terribly exciting. If I'm looking at another reset I'll just stop right now because I have a lot more things to do with 10-15 hours a week.
I don't care which way you want to go, but ont drag me with you. |
Altina McAlterson
TRUE TEA BAGGERS
427
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 00:26:00 -
[43] - Quote
Winscar Shinobi wrote: 1. I know what I said.
2. A warranty is a product.
Yes, I know a warranty is a product. I meant to say the warranty, not the product. |
Maken Tosch
Planetary Response Organisation Test Friends Please Ignore
1807
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 00:31:00 -
[44] - Quote
Altina McAlterson wrote:Winscar Shinobi wrote: 1. I know what I said.
2. A warranty is a product.
Yes, I know a warranty is a product. I meant to say the warranty, not the product.
Guys, I don't want my thread to be derailed by some stupid debate over the difference/similarity between warranties and products. This is not about that. This thread is about trying to collaborate together to come up with a solution.
Again, don't derail my thread. |
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
636
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 00:46:00 -
[45] - Quote
Commercially Released wrote: Greed huh? Who is the greedy one in truth? The person who wants all of what they paid for? Or the person who wants another person not to get what they paid for?
The original "refund at commercial release" part was under the assumption that there would be another reset at release. We now know there won't be one, therfore those people did get what they paid for. What we have no is people trying to take an advantage of a technicality, kind of like AFK farmers.
Lets assume that OB was CR, that was the 22nd and the last reset was the 10th If I remember right. I would bet you 10 mill ISK that if that had been the case people would be complaining that they didn't get their Aurum back on the 22nd, even though they got it back on the 10th.
CCP has already honored the spirit of the agreement, now people are just trying to take an advantage of a technicality.
I agree with Maken about removing the booster part of peoples SP and just giving them the refund, if they want it. |
Garrett Blacknova
Codex Troopers
2170
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 00:50:00 -
[46] - Quote
Terms of purchase and terms of use are separate. Terms of purchase can't be changed after the fact, and include the advertising text used to sell the product at the time of purchase. If the text in the item description in the PS Store included reference to something, that particular inclusion is a legal obligation for the seller. When purchasing - BEFORE agreeing to terms of use, the terms of purchase included mention of the Aurum and items being reset at the commercial release.
That being said, I had a suggestion in another thread which I think will be the best of both worlds.
No SP reset. No ISK reset. No Booster reset. Full refund of all purchased non-Booster gear on commercial release.
This means EVERYTHING you own other than Boosters is sold back to the store at cost price. If you bought an item that wasn't a Booster with AUR, you get back the amount of AUR you spent on it. If you bought something that wasn't a booster with ISK, you get the ISK back. Boosters that were purchased as part of a game pack AREN'T refunded, but you keep all your SP, so you still have the EFFECT of that Booster. Any items awarded by these packs are refunded.
People who have been farming ISK don't get penalised by a reset. People who bought the Merc Pack and were advised they'd have all their stuff reset get it. People who spent Aurum on Boosters don't have to be reset and have to re-use their Boosters.
Best of all worlds, imo. |
Skihids
The Tritan Industries
1110
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 00:55:00 -
[47] - Quote
Garrett Blacknova wrote:Terms of purchase and terms of use are separate. Terms of purchase can't be changed after the fact, and include the advertising text used to sell the product at the time of purchase. If the text in the item description in the PS Store included reference to something, that particular inclusion is a legal obligation for the seller. When purchasing - BEFORE agreeing to terms of use, the terms of purchase included mention of the Aurum and items being reset at the commercial release.
That being said, I had a suggestion in another thread which I think will be the best of both worlds.
No SP reset. No ISK reset. No Booster reset. Full refund of all purchased non-Booster gear on commercial release.
This means EVERYTHING you own other than Boosters is sold back to the store at cost price. If you bought an item that wasn't a Booster with AUR, you get back the amount of AUR you spent on it. If you bought something that wasn't a booster with ISK, you get the ISK back. Boosters that were purchased as part of a game pack AREN'T refunded, but you keep all your SP, so you still have the EFFECT of that Booster. Any items awarded by these packs are refunded.
People who have been farming ISK don't get penalised by a reset. People who bought the Merc Pack and were advised they'd have all their stuff reset get it. People who spent Aurum on Boosters don't have to be reset and have to re-use their Boosters.
Best of all worlds, imo.
You would still have people wanting their boosters back too on that technicality, but call that partial refund a third option and I'm good with it. |
Baal Roo
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
1002
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 00:56:00 -
[48] - Quote
Sloth9230 wrote:Commercially Released wrote: Greed huh? Who is the greedy one in truth? The person who wants all of what they paid for? Or the person who wants another person not to get what they paid for?
The original "refund at commercial release" part was under the assumption that there would be another reset at release. We now know there won't be one, therfore those people did get what they paid for. What we have no is people trying to take an advantage of a technicality, kind of like AFK farmers. Lets assume that OB was CR, that was the 22nd and the last reset was the 10th If I remember right. I would bet you 10 mill ISK that if that had been the case people would be complaining that they didn't get their Aurum back on the 22nd, even though they got it back on the 10th. CCP has already honored the spirit of the agreement, now people are just trying to take an advantage of a technicality. I agree with Maken about removing the booster part of peoples SP and just giving them the refund, if they want it.
The "spirit" of the Merc Pack was that it was a presale of items that we would have at launch. As far as I can tell, this build (0.7) is a pale comparison of next build (0.8), and next build ISN'T the full launch product either. We've got another month of beta until next build, it's been a month and a half since the last wipe, and who knows how much longer from 0.8 to 1.0.
You're really arguing that getting these items in a beta with only a small sliver of the game playable and probably AT LEAST 6 more months before the game launches is "in the spirit" of getting these items at launch?
|
Maken Tosch
Planetary Response Organisation Test Friends Please Ignore
1807
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 00:57:00 -
[49] - Quote
Garrett Blacknova wrote:Terms of purchase and terms of use are separate. Terms of purchase can't be changed after the fact, and include the advertising text used to sell the product at the time of purchase. If the text in the item description in the PS Store included reference to something, that particular inclusion is a legal obligation for the seller. When purchasing - BEFORE agreeing to terms of use, the terms of purchase included mention of the Aurum and items being reset at the commercial release.
That being said, I had a suggestion in another thread which I think will be the best of both worlds.
No SP reset. No ISK reset. No Booster reset. Full refund of all purchased non-Booster gear on commercial release.
This means EVERYTHING you own other than Boosters is sold back to the store at cost price. If you bought an item that wasn't a Booster with AUR, you get back the amount of AUR you spent on it. If you bought something that wasn't a booster with ISK, you get the ISK back. Boosters that were purchased as part of a game pack AREN'T refunded, but you keep all your SP, so you still have the EFFECT of that Booster. Any items awarded by these packs are refunded.
People who have been farming ISK don't get penalised by a reset. People who bought the Merc Pack and were advised they'd have all their stuff reset get it. People who spent Aurum on Boosters don't have to be reset and have to re-use their Boosters.
Best of all worlds, imo.
This may work as well. After all, it is an idea. I'll update the OP. |
Baal Roo
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
1002
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 00:59:00 -
[50] - Quote
Simple solution:
CCP honors the terms of the merc pack and gives the people who purchased the Merc Pack the items in the Merc Pack at "commercial release". This is an agreement between CCP and their paying customers. Whether it satisfies the "I don't want the people who paid to get the thing they purchased" crowd or not is really irrelevant as far as I'm concerned. If you wanted a Merc Pack, you should have bought one, if you didn't, then what's the problem? |
|
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
636
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 01:00:00 -
[51] - Quote
Baal Roo wrote:
You're really arguing that getting these items in a beta with only a small sliver of the game playable and probably AT LEAST 6 more months before the game launches is "in the spirit" of getting these items at launch?
I will keep my ISK, Salvage, and all other Assets, so yes. You're playing the game, however incomplete it may be. This is by all means a commercial release, even if CCP won't admit it. |
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
636
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 01:03:00 -
[52] - Quote
Baal Roo wrote:Simple solution:
CCP honors the terms of the merc pack and gives the people who purchased the Merc Pack the items in the Merc Pack at "commercial release". This is an agreement between CCP and their paying customers. Whether it satisfies the "I don't want the people who paid to get the thing they purchased" crowd or not is really irrelevant as far as I'm concerned. If you wanted a Merc Pack, you should have bought one, if you didn't, then what's the problem? And what problem do you have with giving up any boosted SP? CCP only said they wouldn't fully reset SP, not that they wouldn't take parts of it away.
Quote: We currently have no plans to reset your characters' skill points to a state where they are equivalent to a newly created character, barring something catastrophic.
As long as they don't put you back at 0, they technically haven't lied. |
Vrain Matari
ZionTCD Legacy Rising
460
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 01:06:00 -
[53] - Quote
Wow.
Didn't know this discussion was happening.
I was fully cognizant of my actions when I spent my AUR.
We were told that barring act-of-god catastrophe we had seen the final reset. To ask for a refund of AUR now, with all the complications that implies, seems insane to me.
|
Sete Clifton
PSU GHOST SYNDICATE
79
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 01:09:00 -
[54] - Quote
Sloth9230 wrote:Baal Roo wrote:Simple solution:
CCP honors the terms of the merc pack and gives the people who purchased the Merc Pack the items in the Merc Pack at "commercial release". This is an agreement between CCP and their paying customers. Whether it satisfies the "I don't want the people who paid to get the thing they purchased" crowd or not is really irrelevant as far as I'm concerned. If you wanted a Merc Pack, you should have bought one, if you didn't, then what's the problem? And what problem do you have with giving up any boosted SP? CCP only said they wouldn't fully reset SP, not that they wouldn't take parts of it away. Quote: We currently have no plans to reset your characters' skill points to a state where they are equivalent to a newly created character, barring something catastrophic.
As long as they don't put you back at 0, they technically haven't lied.
Forcing them to refund AUR when they have no plans to could also very easily be considered "catastrophic", especially since AUR effects SP. So they could reset you to as low as zero and they still wouldn't have lied.
|
Maken Tosch
Planetary Response Organisation Test Friends Please Ignore
1807
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 01:10:00 -
[55] - Quote
Sloth9230 wrote:Baal Roo wrote:Simple solution:
CCP honors the terms of the merc pack and gives the people who purchased the Merc Pack the items in the Merc Pack at "commercial release". This is an agreement between CCP and their paying customers. Whether it satisfies the "I don't want the people who paid to get the thing they purchased" crowd or not is really irrelevant as far as I'm concerned. If you wanted a Merc Pack, you should have bought one, if you didn't, then what's the problem? And what problem do you have with giving up any boosted SP? CCP only said they wouldn't fully reset SP, not that they wouldn't take parts of it away. Quote: We currently have no plans to reset your characters' skill points to a state where they are equivalent to a newly created character, barring something catastrophic.
As long as they don't put you back at 0, they technically haven't lied.
CCP could technically do a partial reset of SP as suggested by the second idea posted on my OP (original idea by Hauker Due). After all, CCP did say they won't do a reset that equates to a "state where they are equivalent to a newly created character". This way, no one's character starts all over again like a newly-created character. They will just adjusted based on the SP gained from boosters. |
Baal Roo
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
1004
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 01:11:00 -
[56] - Quote
Sloth9230 wrote:Baal Roo wrote:Simple solution:
CCP honors the terms of the merc pack and gives the people who purchased the Merc Pack the items in the Merc Pack at "commercial release". This is an agreement between CCP and their paying customers. Whether it satisfies the "I don't want the people who paid to get the thing they purchased" crowd or not is really irrelevant as far as I'm concerned. If you wanted a Merc Pack, you should have bought one, if you didn't, then what's the problem? And what problem do you have with giving up any boosted SP? CCP only said they wouldn't fully reset SP, not that they wouldn't take parts of it away. Quote: We currently have no plans to reset your characters' skill points to a state where they are equivalent to a newly created character, barring something catastrophic.
As long as they don't put you back at 0, they technically haven't lied.
I don't have any problem giving back boosted SP if I get my booster back. I just don't see why it's necessary. Seems like a complicated way of fixing a simple problem, and one that the only purpose of is to say "nanny nanny boo boo" to paying customers.
Furthermore, this issue STILL hasn't been officially clarified by CCP. Many people spent their stuff from the Merc Pack assuming that it would be refunded at launch. If CCP would communicate with the players about this it would really clear this up. |
Maken Tosch
Planetary Response Organisation Test Friends Please Ignore
1807
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 01:13:00 -
[57] - Quote
Baal Roo wrote:Seems like a complicated way of fixing a simple problem
There is a problem with this statement. The problem is not simple. |
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
636
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 01:14:00 -
[58] - Quote
Baal Roo wrote: Many people spent their stuff from the Merc Pack assuming that it would be refunded at launch
We all know what they say about assumptions.
|
Sete Clifton
PSU GHOST SYNDICATE
79
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 01:15:00 -
[59] - Quote
Baal Roo wrote:Sloth9230 wrote:Baal Roo wrote:Simple solution:
CCP honors the terms of the merc pack and gives the people who purchased the Merc Pack the items in the Merc Pack at "commercial release". This is an agreement between CCP and their paying customers. Whether it satisfies the "I don't want the people who paid to get the thing they purchased" crowd or not is really irrelevant as far as I'm concerned. If you wanted a Merc Pack, you should have bought one, if you didn't, then what's the problem? And what problem do you have with giving up any boosted SP? CCP only said they wouldn't fully reset SP, not that they wouldn't take parts of it away. Quote: We currently have no plans to reset your characters' skill points to a state where they are equivalent to a newly created character, barring something catastrophic.
As long as they don't put you back at 0, they technically haven't lied. I don't have any problem giving back boosted SP if I get my booster back. I just don't see why it's necessary. Seems like a complicated way of fixing a simple problem, and one that the only purpose of is to say "nanny nanny boo boo" to paying customers. Furthermore, this issue STILL hasn't been officially clarified by CCP. Many people spent their stuff from the Merc Pack assuming that it would be refunded at launch. If CCP would communicate with the players about this it would really clear this up.
Here's why it's necessary:
Player A buys a merc pack and uses a passive booster and get x amount of SP because of it. Player B doesn't buy a merc pack and doesn't use a booster.
Player A is refunded his merc pack, keeps his SP and uses another booster to get another x amount of SP. This brings his total SP to that of Player B's + 2x.
Again, I don't really care, but if you want things to all be square then gained SP needs to be taken away as well. I'm not sure that is even possible, so a total reset seems more likely. This isn't the only reason, but it's the general idea. |
Baal Roo
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
1004
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 01:17:00 -
[60] - Quote
Sloth9230 wrote:Baal Roo wrote: Many people spent their stuff from the Merc Pack assuming that it would be refunded at launch
We all know what they say about assumptions.
I think assuming that a purchase agreement will be fulfilled by the seller should generally be considered an exception to the rule. If I buy a big mac from you, I ASSUME I will receive a big mac in exchange for the money I paid. |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |