Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Bojo The Mighty
L.O.T.I.S.
2704
|
Posted - 2014.01.16 01:22:00 -
[151] - Quote
Beck Weathers wrote: You see, the MAIN reason Im against respecs is because I don't belive it will be a "one time deal" they will likely change bonuses many times in the future, release new suits many times in the future, and generaly tweak the game as they see fit. When the nw heavy weapons come out, and CCP gave us a respec now, how willthey deny all heavys getting a compleete weapon respec? They will say that CCP caved for this patch and they will have no ground to stand on against them. Or what if they add 3 round to the plasma cannon per mag and take away its charge time, will fundimentaly change how its used, respec!
If CCP promises to never give a respec again no matter how much we beg (unless they remove skills) , i might be convinced, but I just dont see it starting once it starts.
It already started with Uprising and once it's started well it's started from their you can have a middle and an end.
Also why shouldn't CCP be forced to live with their decisions? If the players get locked into a suit why shouldn't CCP be locked from changing that suit? In that case and ONLY THAT CASE could CCP get away with no respecs.
Check out latest BSOTT Guide
|
J-Lewis
Edimmu Warfighters Gallente Federation
334
|
Posted - 2014.01.16 01:25:00 -
[152] - Quote
Bojo The Mighty wrote:J-Lewis wrote:Respecs undo the most common incentive to log on: character progress.
From a designers standpoint; respecs are an absolute nightmare. Every time you issue a respec, you are sacrificing how much longer players are going to stick around to unlock new content.
A lot of people could do with learning that the best things in life are those you earn through invested effort. It would make the lives of the devs so much easier if they didn't have to constantly worry about respecs whenever they want to change something, I suspect. But who would want to invest in something they did not want to invest in? That's the point: no one. If you issue respecs, that's exactly what happens: people invest them in what they fancy at the moment.
Things people fancy at the moment and character progress incentives go hand in hand. A respec simply means players can skip that much of the character progress. Then the next respec comes around: the player has moved on and wants to try the most appealing toy post change. Every time there is a respec, players can scratch one more goal's worth of content off the total list of content.
And for a content starved game like DUST... You see where I'm going...
A bit of suffering makes the tiniest accomplishment seem worthwhile, and it's time this community swapped its diapers for big boy pants.
Reimbursing the SP for a removed skill is reasonable. Respecs for simple balance changes is not. |
emtbraincase
RETR0 PR0 GAMERS INTERGALACTIC WARPIGS
39
|
Posted - 2014.01.16 01:27:00 -
[153] - Quote
Beck Weathers wrote:Heck im not even sure you are considering it, but IF YOU ARE, stop, don't pander to these cry babys. I have quite a bit of skills in mimatar scout yet havent really used it since the hit detection fix where speed tanking became a thing of the past. EvE is about living with your decisions, and honestly giving people respecs for uprising rather than doing a hard reset was probialy one of your greatest mistakes, Don't make that mistake again, dont let these losers who can't adapt skill into the next FotM. While suit skills may change and stats may change the skill tree is staying the same, and like all past new guns they will just have to skill into new things the same way as everyone else.
Of course the biggest question is, when would they even do it? because you all know its not all going to be released in 1.8 its liekly going to be released over 1.8 - 2, the new suits guns and skills, so at what point would they give you your so wanted respec? 2.0 after its all out? once ever expantion a new suit is released? I believe, due to the several obvious inaccuracies throughout this, that I am forced to reach the conclusion that we have, in our midst, a fully-formed and free-thinking troll. What does the rest of science have to say about it? |
Bethhy
Ancient Exiles. Renegade Alliance
837
|
Posted - 2014.01.16 01:41:00 -
[154] - Quote
Bethhy wrote:Yes give me my dreamed about perfect skill allocation for this next patch and all will be alright everything will be fixed. Except when the next patch changes or when a whole new expansion comes out in 2.0 and that respec is even more useless because more shinny stuff will come out... This is endless and has NEVER fixed an activity problem in any game but momentarily. you will get reimbursed for your dropsuit skills so you can reallocate and then enjoy a tripple SP event... What more could you really want seriously without it being all about memememememe, my skills and pretending like you never got any use out of them, and now wanting to trade them in for a brand new pair of shoes There are core mechanic issues persistent for 2 years and your trying to blame inactivity on not having the perfect skills or having to work to get some new ones. its sad.
|
Bojo The Mighty
L.O.T.I.S.
2704
|
Posted - 2014.01.16 01:41:00 -
[155] - Quote
J-Lewis wrote:That's the point: no one. If you issue respecs, that's exactly what happens: people invest them in what they fancy at the moment. Things people fancy at the moment and character progress incentives go hand in hand. A respec simply means players can skip that much of the character progress. Then the next respec comes around: the player has moved on and wants to try the most appealing toy post change. Every time there is a respec, players can scratch one more goal's worth of content off the total list of content. And for a content starved game like DUST... You see where I'm going... A bit of suffering makes the tiniest accomplishment seem worthwhile, and it's time this community swapped its diapers for big boy pants. Reimbursing the SP for a removed skill is reasonable. Respecs for simple balance changes is not. So not only are you saying that people should be forced to locked into a suit/role that THEY did not spec into at the time but you are also saying that radically overhauling a suit is balancing rather than a new direction?
Also why do you base your argument off of future respecs? We are talking about when the changes hit, not every month. You can't have FOTM without monthly respecs.
Check out latest BSOTT Guide
|
Charlotte O'Dell
Fatal Absolution Covert Intervention
1637
|
Posted - 2014.01.16 01:53:00 -
[156] - Quote
knight of 6 wrote:"living with your decisions"
I want a Ferrari, i'll go buy one. I now can't afford my mortgage and they foreclosed my house! [this is a decision]
I want a Ferrari, i'll go buy one that I can afford because I made a fortune with bitcoin. I walked into my garage this morning to admire my Ferrari, but alas it is now a tricycle. [this is not a decision]
couldn't have put it better, myself.
Charlotte O'Dell is the highest level unicorn!
|
Sirys Lyons
Tronhadar Free Guard Minmatar Republic
64
|
Posted - 2014.01.16 01:54:00 -
[157] - Quote
knight of 6 wrote:"living with your decisions"
I want a Ferrari, i'll go buy one. I now can't afford my mortgage and they foreclosed my house! [this is a decision]
I want a Ferrari, i'll go buy one that I can afford because I made a fortune with bitcoin. I walked into my garage this morning to admire my Ferrari, but alas it is now a tricycle. [this is not a decision]
Too true.
|
Beck Weathers
Ghosts of Dawn General Tso's Alliance
289
|
Posted - 2014.01.16 02:00:00 -
[158] - Quote
emtbraincase wrote:Beck Weathers wrote:Heck im not even sure you are considering it, but IF YOU ARE, stop, don't pander to these cry babys. I have quite a bit of skills in mimatar scout yet havent really used it since the hit detection fix where speed tanking became a thing of the past. EvE is about living with your decisions, and honestly giving people respecs for uprising rather than doing a hard reset was probialy one of your greatest mistakes, Don't make that mistake again, dont let these losers who can't adapt skill into the next FotM. While suit skills may change and stats may change the skill tree is staying the same, and like all past new guns they will just have to skill into new things the same way as everyone else.
Of course the biggest question is, when would they even do it? because you all know its not all going to be released in 1.8 its liekly going to be released over 1.8 - 2, the new suits guns and skills, so at what point would they give you your so wanted respec? 2.0 after its all out? once ever expantion a new suit is released? I believe, due to the several obvious inaccuracies throughout this, that I am forced to reach the conclusion that we have, in our midst, a fully-formed and free-thinking troll. What does the rest of science have to say about it?
Well I would be lieing if I said that poking all these bears wasent fun as hell. But I still think caving to respecs will have a negitive effect on the game. |
Marston VC
SVER True Blood Public Disorder.
1505
|
Posted - 2014.01.16 02:05:00 -
[159] - Quote
knight of 6 wrote:"living with your decisions"
I want a Ferrari, i'll go buy one. I now can't afford my mortgage and they foreclosed my house! [this is a decision]
I want a Ferrari, i'll go buy one that I can afford because I made a fortune with bitcoin. I walked into my garage this morning to admire my Ferrari, but alas it is now a tricycle. [this is not a decision]
nothing truer has ever been said! And I don't even need a respec! (considering I have like 32M SP.......)
Marston VC, STB Director
|
Bethhy
Ancient Exiles. Renegade Alliance
837
|
Posted - 2014.01.16 02:06:00 -
[160] - Quote
Sirys Lyons wrote:knight of 6 wrote:"living with your decisions"
I want a Ferrari, i'll go buy one. I now can't afford my mortgage and they foreclosed my house! [this is a decision]
I want a Ferrari, i'll go buy one that I can afford because I made a fortune with bitcoin. I walked into my garage this morning to admire my Ferrari, but alas it is now a tricycle. [this is not a decision] Too true.
Except when you invest into a Ferrari get plenty of use and admiration out of it. Walk into your garage one day and it's worth 120 grand less.
Things change. doesn't mean you get to trade in said Ferrari for a new and better one.
Quote:People who collect Ferraris or simply covet them from afar spend a lot of time trying to decide when a model of a certain age, like a decade-old 550 or 575 Maranello, has GÇ£hit bottomGÇ¥ in terms of depreciation. The idea is that once a car is fully depreciated it may soon begin to grow in value. It could also be a good value for bargain shoppers. |
|
Sirys Lyons
Tronhadar Free Guard Minmatar Republic
66
|
Posted - 2014.01.16 02:12:00 -
[161] - Quote
Bethhy wrote:
Except when you invest into a Ferrari get plenty of use and admiration out of it. Walk into your garage one day and it's worth 120 grand less.
Things change. doesn't mean you get to trade in said Ferrari for a new and better one.
Except that everyone knows that cars depreciate. It is a known and expected downside of vehicle ownership that deals with resale value of a used item; not the item itself.
Cars don't - suddenly - lose performance or change their abilities.
And if they do - funnily enough - we call them broken. |
Beck Weathers
Ghosts of Dawn General Tso's Alliance
289
|
Posted - 2014.01.16 02:20:00 -
[162] - Quote
Sirys Lyons wrote:Bethhy wrote:
Except when you invest into a Ferrari get plenty of use and admiration out of it. Walk into your garage one day and it's worth 120 grand less.
Things change. doesn't mean you get to trade in said Ferrari for a new and better one.
Except that everyone knows that cars depreciate. It is a known and expected downside of vehicle ownership that deals with resale value of a used item; not the item itself. Cars don't - suddenly - lose performance or change their abilities. And if they do - funnily enough - we call them broken.
but eveyone knows suits will change skills based on CCPs balancing whims
|
Bethhy
Ancient Exiles. Renegade Alliance
837
|
Posted - 2014.01.16 02:25:00 -
[163] - Quote
Sirys Lyons wrote:Bethhy wrote:
Except when you invest into a Ferrari get plenty of use and admiration out of it. Walk into your garage one day and it's worth 120 grand less.
Things change. doesn't mean you get to trade in said Ferrari for a new and better one.
Except that everyone knows that cars depreciate. They don't - suddenly - lose performance or change their abilities. And if they do - funnily enough - we call them broken.
Everyone knew suit's would change, weapons would be rebalanced, eventually the additional racial suits would get added with some kind of announcement and time to save up for it.
We where warned twice by CCP about being the last respec. Everyone has skills no longer relevant to the actual gameplay, one day they might be extremely useful and we will have already gotten them.
we can pretend we didn't get any use out of them and now they are equally as valuable as something we would trade them in for.. but it doesn't scan...
|
J-Lewis
Edimmu Warfighters Gallente Federation
335
|
Posted - 2014.01.16 02:38:00 -
[164] - Quote
Bojo The Mighty wrote:J-Lewis wrote:That's the point: no one. If you issue respecs, that's exactly what happens: people invest them in what they fancy at the moment. Things people fancy at the moment and character progress incentives go hand in hand. A respec simply means players can skip that much of the character progress. Then the next respec comes around: the player has moved on and wants to try the most appealing toy post change. Every time there is a respec, players can scratch one more goal's worth of content off the total list of content. And for a content starved game like DUST... You see where I'm going... A bit of suffering makes the tiniest accomplishment seem worthwhile, and it's time this community swapped its diapers for big boy pants. Reimbursing the SP for a removed skill is reasonable. Respecs for simple balance changes is not. So not only are you saying that people should be forced to locked into a suit/role that THEY did not spec into at the time but you are also saying that radically overhauling a suit is balancing rather than a new direction? Also why do you base your argument off of future respecs? We are talking about when the changes hit, not every month. You can't have FOTM without monthly respecs.
Please don't put words in my mouth.
I wrote that character progress was the most widespread incentive to logging in. I argued that respecs undo the incentive to log in that character progress creates in exchange for a one time "log in binge". I'm stating that an overhaul serves the higher purpose of balance, and that balance is an iterative process. I'm reasoning that the removal of a skillbook warrants returning the SP invested in that skillbook. I'm rebuting the opinion that a simple act of balancing merits a respec.
I'm ending our conversation on this topic here.
Have a nice day. |
True Adamance
Kameira Lodge Amarr Empire
5771
|
Posted - 2014.01.16 02:52:00 -
[165] - Quote
Bethhy wrote:Sirys Lyons wrote:Bethhy wrote:
Except when you invest into a Ferrari get plenty of use and admiration out of it. Walk into your garage one day and it's worth 120 grand less.
Things change. doesn't mean you get to trade in said Ferrari for a new and better one.
Except that everyone knows that cars depreciate. They don't - suddenly - lose performance or change their abilities. And if they do - funnily enough - we call them broken. Everyone knew suit's would change, weapons would be rebalanced, eventually the additional racial suits would get added with some kind of announcement and time to save up for it. We where warned twice by CCP about being the last respec. Everyone has skills no longer relevant to the actual gameplay, one day they might be extremely useful and we will have already gotten them. we can pretend we didn't get any use out of them and now they are equally as valuable as something we would trade them in for.. but it doesn't scan...
I didn't. Since the start of my time playing dust the suits I had initially wanted to skill into have not been present in the game.
Caldari Heavy, Cal Scout, etc.
However now I am resolved on my choice. I will skill into Amarr scouts, HAV, vehicles, and pilot suits anyway. However, and I'm not demanding a respect, endorsing one, or even suspecting we will get one, I like to think that my 12 months playing dust have not been a waste of time given than I have never had the Amarr scout to skill into. I would have liked that option very much months ago.
Unfortunately I didn't have that and much of my SP is tied up in the only suit that I found to fit them then style of play which was Amarrian.
"My Faith in you is absolute; my sword is Yours, My God, and Your will guides me now and for all eternity."
|
Fizzer94
L.O.T.I.S. D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E
1343
|
Posted - 2014.01.16 03:01:00 -
[166] - Quote
This thread has taken a turn for the worse, and has turned from healthy debate into something less.
The simple fact is, most people think a skill refund is an acceptable option considering the circumstances. It would be wise of CCP to take their opinions into account.
It was also bad on CCPs part to say refund/respecs will never happen, then dramatically change the roles and playstyled of almost every suit in the game. Actions like this breed distrust.
Yours Truly,
Reginald Fizzer94 Delafontaine III, Esquire
|
Bojo The Mighty
L.O.T.I.S.
2705
|
Posted - 2014.01.16 03:15:00 -
[167] - Quote
J-Lewis wrote:Bojo The Mighty wrote:[quote=J-Lewis] That's the point: no one. If you issue respecs, that's exactly what happens: people invest them in what they fancy at the moment. Things people fancy at the moment and character progress incentives go hand in hand. A respec simply means players can skip that much of the character progress. Then the next respec comes around: the player has moved on and wants to try the most appealing toy post change. Every time there is a respec, players can scratch one more goal's worth of content off the total list of content. And for a content starved game like DUST... You see where I'm going... A bit of suffering makes the tiniest accomplishment seem worthwhile, and it's time this community swapped its diapers for big boy pants. Reimbursing the SP for a removed skill is reasonable. Respecs for simple balance changes is not. Please don't put words in my mouth. I wrote that character progress was the most widespread incentive to logging in. I argued that respecs undo the incentive to log in that character progress creates in exchange for a one time "log in binge". I'm stating that an overhaul serves the higher purpose of balance, and that balance is an iterative process.I'm reasoning that the removal of a skillbook warrants returning the SP invested in that skillbook. I'm rebuting the opinion that a simple act of balancing merits a respec. I'm ending our conversation on this topic here. Have a nice day. You have to work for the last word Underlined portions are what you said and what I reiterated. You are basing your argument off of the possibility of numerous-different respecs in the future. Secondly you are saying that people should have to stick by the side of a suit even if it is taken to a different role just for the sake of balance.
Removing a sidearm and adding an equipment slot to one suit is not balance, that's a tradeoff, that's a new direction. They are changing the fundamentals of a suit, and if no respec is given, people signing on for a combat suit will end up with a logistics suit. You said that "overhaul serves a higher purpose of balance" and that "Respecs for simple balance changes is not" a reason for SP unallocation.
I put no words in your mouth, you just need to stand by your words, I made the mistake of not standing by my words once and it haunts me. You are saying that NO RESPECS unless a skill is removed. What if the profile dampening skill no longer included a bonus (+2% reduction profile p/l) or even replaced with a skill (let's say +10% to your profile so you can be scanned easier). The skill was not removed but the bonus was. What I want to know from you is that if that does not constitute a skill removal than what does? Having the title changed?
The fact of the matter is that things are going to be dramatically changing, so much that suits will be going in completely different directions. The Scout is becoming a logistics type suit the assaults are becoming tank suits and some suit bonuses will only apply to certain modules. It's about how the suits are completely changing AND the skills. Nothing is going to be the same so why should you be specced into the same things?
What if CCP took your suit and swapped the low and high slot counts and didn't spec you out of the suit. How is that fair? What destroys character progression is CCP destroying the essence of your already existing character and changing its principles.
Again, it's not FOTM if there is no monthly respec.
Check out latest BSOTT Guide
|
Beck Weathers
Ghosts of Dawn General Tso's Alliance
289
|
Posted - 2014.01.16 03:38:00 -
[168] - Quote
Bojo The Mighty wrote: Again, it's not FOTM if there is no monthly respec.
Because you know there is no way to skill into a new suit nor guns without respecs.
|
Fizzer94
L.O.T.I.S. D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E
1344
|
Posted - 2014.01.16 03:47:00 -
[169] - Quote
Beck Weathers wrote:Bojo The Mighty wrote: Again, it's not FOTM if there is no monthly respec.
Because you know there is no way to skill into a new suit nor guns without respecs. But there is no way to skill out of a suit/weapon you have no intention of ever using again because the developers changed it so much that it cannot perform the same functions that you had originally skilled into it for. That is why we want a dropsuit SP refund.
Yours Truly,
Reginald Fizzer94 Delafontaine III, Esquire
|
Bojo The Mighty
L.O.T.I.S.
2707
|
Posted - 2014.01.16 03:52:00 -
[170] - Quote
Beck Weathers wrote:Bojo The Mighty wrote: Again, it's not FOTM if there is no monthly respec.
Because you know there is no way to skill into a new suit nor guns without respecs. That's not entirely true I am saying there is no character completely designed for FOTM without monthly respecs. That was my bad I should have been a little more specific. I can obviously spec into FOTM if I choose but it would require SP accumulation on my end. If there was a monthly respec I could invest my existing SP however I please and choose a FOTM. But since there will be no such thing as monthly respec, you don't have to worry about FOTM.
If CCP does an Infantry respec, people will spec into what they please and in any scenario with/without respec there will be uneven distribution but that is natural, just like there are more ants in the world than elephants. Things will be no different then when they introduced new weapons. People will spam new weapons for a while and it will be chaotic but then things will even out. And there was no respec for the new weapons either and the spam was like maximum. There's nothing preventing people from speccing into a new direction but a single respec is not going to direct the whole populace to one suit, one weapon, one fitting. It just won't happen even to a point of majority.
People have been playing since 2011 and waiting for X suit but never got it and had to work with substitutes. Now that X suit is coming out, I think it's fair that they be unshackled and go to what they've been waiting/planning for.
Check out latest BSOTT Guide
|
|
Lea Silencio
0uter.Heaven Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
1036
|
Posted - 2014.01.16 06:08:00 -
[171] - Quote
Again, it's simple...
Mass new content deserves a respec, with scouts, heavies and vehicle users at the forefront. Their stuff is missing still.
Complete re-stucture of vital skills is also grounds for allowing a respec to the affected skills.
It should only be given once all the main MISSING content is finally delivered. They can do it all at once and make that the FINAL respec.
End of story.
PurificationGäó
It's what I do.
Amarr Victor
|
Beck Weathers
Ghosts of Dawn General Tso's Alliance
289
|
Posted - 2014.01.16 07:15:00 -
[172] - Quote
Bojo The Mighty wrote:Beck Weathers wrote:Bojo The Mighty wrote: Again, it's not FOTM if there is no monthly respec.
Because you know there is no way to skill into a new suit nor guns without respecs. That's not entirely true I am saying there is no character completely designed for FOTM without monthly respecs. That was my bad I should have been a little more specific. I can obviously spec into FOTM if I choose but it would require SP accumulation on my end. If there was a monthly respec I could invest my existing SP however I please and choose a FOTM. But since there will be no such thing as monthly respec, you don't have to worry about FOTM. If CCP does an Infantry respec, people will spec into what they please and in any scenario with/without respec there will be uneven distribution but that is natural, just like there are more ants in the world than elephants. Things will be no different then when they introduced new weapons. People will spam new weapons for a while and it will be chaotic but then things will even out. And there was no respec for the new weapons either and the spam was like maximum. There's nothing preventing people from speccing into a new direction but a single respec is not going to direct the whole populace to one suit, one weapon, one fitting. It just won't happen even to a point of majority. People have been playing since 2011 and waiting for X suit but never got it and had to work with substitutes. Now that X suit is coming out, I think it's fair that they be unshackled and go to what they've been waiting/planning for.
Omg... i got one of you to present a reasonalble argument without spite or sarcasim, nor personal attacks agont my inteligance, my job is done here!
I do remind you that a unhealthy amount of people specked into caldari logi last respec, just saying, but you have still earned me shuting up |
Lucrezia LeGrand
217
|
Posted - 2014.01.16 07:43:00 -
[173] - Quote
True Adamance wrote:KING CHECKMATE wrote:Nocturnal Soul wrote:How about I hold a SCP to your head. A infantry respec is inevitable learn to live with it. LOL @ ''No at Respec'' scrubs.Naturally dont know 5h!t about how to keep a gaming communtiy alive.... +1 FOR respecs. ...Meh you can keep a community alive by being insanely harsh on them.....look at Demon's Souls and Dark Souls...... people still playing those games even now. Yeah, but they were being harsh in a good way e.g. with a challenging gameplay that was solid, rewarding, and most importantly, complete.
There was no missing assets. It was complete from beginning to end. What a gloriously, wonderfully, complete experience Demon's Souls and Dark Souls turned out to be. Nothing missing in those two gems. My God, how I love those two games.
Now I feel all nice and tingly for remembering how great they were. Thank you.
ya- hoi hoi
|
ADAM-OF-EVE
Dead Man's Game
797
|
Posted - 2014.01.16 07:49:00 -
[174] - Quote
suit respec and only when they are all out... ccp should hold back the skill changes and new suits untill they can be released together with a suit respec. this way we can finally put this to rest
https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=99075&find
|
Jack McReady
DUST University Ivy League
1060
|
Posted - 2014.01.16 08:59:00 -
[175] - Quote
True Adamance wrote:...Meh you can keep a community alive by being insanely harsh on them.....look at Demon's Souls and Dark Souls...... people still playing those games even now. bad example, in demon or dark soul getting a pvp toon takes like a few hours even if you do it without exploits. those games are also harsh in a very different sense.
DUST Fiend wrote: What little credibility you may have had throughout this thread just died with what you just said.
he never had any crediblity to begin with. this guy does not even know the difference of EVE and DUST
Beck Weathers wrote: Logic is in the eye of the beholder bub
logic is in the eye of persons with enough brainpower to sport it obviously you lack it when you cant even see basic coherences of hard facts presented to you on a silver plate.
congrats on making yourself look like the most stupid member of the dust community, you get a medal (made out of poop) |
John Demonsbane
Unorganized Ninja Infantry Tactics League of Infamy
1602
|
Posted - 2014.01.16 12:23:00 -
[176] - Quote
Beck Weathers wrote:Bojo The Mighty wrote:Beck Weathers wrote:Bojo The Mighty wrote: Again, it's not FOTM if there is no monthly respec.
Because you know there is no way to skill into a new suit nor guns without respecs. That's not entirely true I am saying there is no character completely designed for FOTM without monthly respecs. That was my bad I should have been a little more specific. I can obviously spec into FOTM if I choose but it would require SP accumulation on my end. If there was a monthly respec I could invest my existing SP however I please and choose a FOTM. But since there will be no such thing as monthly respec, you don't have to worry about FOTM. If CCP does an Infantry respec, people will spec into what they please and in any scenario with/without respec there will be uneven distribution but that is natural, just like there are more ants in the world than elephants. Things will be no different then when they introduced new weapons. People will spam new weapons for a while and it will be chaotic but then things will even out. And there was no respec for the new weapons either and the spam was like maximum. There's nothing preventing people from speccing into a new direction but a single respec is not going to direct the whole populace to one suit, one weapon, one fitting. It just won't happen even to a point of majority. People have been playing since 2011 and waiting for X suit but never got it and had to work with substitutes. Now that X suit is coming out, I think it's fair that they be unshackled and go to what they've been waiting/planning for. Omg... i got one of you to present a reasonalble argument without spite or sarcasim, nor personal attacks agont my inteligance, my job is done here! I do remind you that a unhealthy amount of people specked into caldari logi last respec, just saying, but you have still earned me shuting up
Wait... All I had to do to shut you up was take the sarcasm out of my post? Damn, I wish I had known that before.
"The line between disorder and order lies in logistics" -Sun Tzu
Amarr victor!
Forum Warrior lv.1
|
Anoko Destrolock
Crimson Saints
32
|
Posted - 2014.01.16 12:35:00 -
[177] - Quote
Beck Weathers wrote:Heck im not even sure you are considering it, but IF YOU ARE, stop, don't pander to these cry babys. I have quite a bit of skills in mimatar scout yet havent really used it since the hit detection fix where speed tanking became a thing of the past. EvE is about living with your decisions, and honestly giving people respecs for uprising rather than doing a hard reset was probialy one of your greatest mistakes, Don't make that mistake again, dont let these losers who can't adapt skill into the next FotM. While suit skills may change and stats may change the skill tree is staying the same, and like all past new guns they will just have to skill into new things the same way as everyone else.
Of course the biggest question is, when would they even do it? because you all know its not all going to be released in 1.8 its liekly going to be released over 1.8 - 2, the new suits guns and skills, so at what point would they give you your so wanted respec? 2.0 after its all out? once ever expantion a new suit is released?
You sir, are a dumbdumb. Your worried about FotM and people adapting.....lol. Everything is changing bro. Go home or go away. You comments are not welcome here. |
Spkr4theDead
Red Star. EoN.
1665
|
Posted - 2014.01.16 12:37:00 -
[178] - Quote
People that play EVE tell me they get one neural remap a year.
Why shouldn't we have the same?
I may be missing something, but I'm pretty sure that I didn't call for a tank nerf before Uprising 1.7. - Atiim
|
Rasatsu
Much Crying Old Experts
999
|
Posted - 2014.01.16 12:50:00 -
[179] - Quote
Spkr4theDead wrote:People that play EVE tell me they get one neural remap a year.
Why shouldn't we have the same? But we also don't have banana-milkshake in EVE, so that's why we shouldn't have respecs. |
Rogue Saint
Science For Death
677
|
Posted - 2014.01.16 12:57:00 -
[180] - Quote
Spkr4theDead wrote:People that play EVE tell me they get one neural remap a year.
Why shouldn't we have the same?
A neural remap doesn't change the skills you have already learned or give you an SP pool back. It just allows you to remap your base attributes such as Memory, Intelligence etc. This can then allow you to train more skills "faster" depending on the skills attribute focus.
GôêGÆ+GÆ+GƦ - Causes headaches, it's official
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |