Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 11 12 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Buster Friently
Rosen Association
1672
|
Posted - 2013.09.12 16:18:00 -
[181] - Quote
God Anpu TheImmortal wrote:Honestly I am pleased with this but everyone knows the assault rifle trumphs all. It is a joke that an AR can hit further and do more damage than an HMG. The truth of the matter is that it always will and CCP is not going to change this because they fear that their fan base will die. But they talk balance. Lol ccp is a joke with these stats and how they decided about weapons and they want this to be a thinking shooter won't happen as long as AR are king. Bringing realism to this game would bring balance and start people to thinking and using tactics. Currently to get kills all u need is an assault rifle and M1 grenades or higher and your and instant killer. Why have other classes and weapons. Or better yet why should people that truly love and play this game have to deal with this crap or skill into an assault rifle to remain relevant. I thought CCP was keeping stats on weapons to know these things and prevent this.
Their fan base is already dead. This persistent AR issue is part of the problem. It kills diversity. It kills tactics. It kills depth.
That's why we're hitting a peak of just over 3k concurrent users since 1.4 - there's no point anymore.
I also love how this issue has been brought to the forefront consistently for over a month, plus it was being brought up over a year ago off and on, and nothing in the feedback weekly on it.
Well CCP, Dust is just about dead because you've tried to make the same old same old rather than bring innovative. In the end, all you've accomplished is a crappier version of same old same old and it seems no one really wants to play that.
Eve struck out in it's own direction. Dust must do the same or die.
|
D legendary hero
THE WARRIORS OF LEGEND
963
|
Posted - 2013.09.12 16:50:00 -
[182] - Quote
Buster Friently wrote:God Anpu TheImmortal wrote:Honestly I am pleased with this but everyone knows the assault rifle trumphs all. It is a joke that an AR can hit further and do more damage than an HMG. The truth of the matter is that it always will and CCP is not going to change this because they fear that their fan base will die. But they talk balance. Lol ccp is a joke with these stats and how they decided about weapons and they want this to be a thinking shooter won't happen as long as AR are king. Bringing realism to this game would bring balance and start people to thinking and using tactics. Currently to get kills all u need is an assault rifle and M1 grenades or higher and your and instant killer. Why have other classes and weapons. Or better yet why should people that truly love and play this game have to deal with this crap or skill into an assault rifle to remain relevant. I thought CCP was keeping stats on weapons to know these things and prevent this. Their fan base is already dead. This persistent AR issue is part of the problem. It kills diversity. It kills tactics. It kills depth. That's why we're hitting a peak of just over 3k concurrent users since 1.4 - there's no point anymore. I also love how this issue has been brought to the forefront consistently for over a month, plus it was being brought up over a year ago off and on, and nothing in the feedback weekly on it. Well CCP, Dust is just about dead because you've tried to make the same old same old rather than bring innovative. In the end, all you've accomplished is a crappier version of same old same old and it seems no one really wants to play that. Eve struck out in it's own direction. Dust must do the same or die.
Buster Im glad you are here responding to this. do you have anymore of your statistics or links about ARs being OP please post them here. I want this thread to be easily accessible for CCP devs to see all about ars |
Buster Friently
Rosen Association
1672
|
Posted - 2013.09.12 17:30:00 -
[183] - Quote
D legendary hero wrote:Buster Friently wrote:God Anpu TheImmortal wrote:Honestly I am pleased with this but everyone knows the assault rifle trumphs all. It is a joke that an AR can hit further and do more damage than an HMG. The truth of the matter is that it always will and CCP is not going to change this because they fear that their fan base will die. But they talk balance. Lol ccp is a joke with these stats and how they decided about weapons and they want this to be a thinking shooter won't happen as long as AR are king. Bringing realism to this game would bring balance and start people to thinking and using tactics. Currently to get kills all u need is an assault rifle and M1 grenades or higher and your and instant killer. Why have other classes and weapons. Or better yet why should people that truly love and play this game have to deal with this crap or skill into an assault rifle to remain relevant. I thought CCP was keeping stats on weapons to know these things and prevent this. Their fan base is already dead. This persistent AR issue is part of the problem. It kills diversity. It kills tactics. It kills depth. That's why we're hitting a peak of just over 3k concurrent users since 1.4 - there's no point anymore. I also love how this issue has been brought to the forefront consistently for over a month, plus it was being brought up over a year ago off and on, and nothing in the feedback weekly on it. Well CCP, Dust is just about dead because you've tried to make the same old same old rather than bring innovative. In the end, all you've accomplished is a crappier version of same old same old and it seems no one really wants to play that. Eve struck out in it's own direction. Dust must do the same or die. Buster Im glad you are here responding to this. do you have anymore of your statistics or links about ARs being OP please post them here. I want this thread to be easily accessible for CCP devs to see all about ars
Unfortunately, I've stopped playing Dust for the time being, so I don't have new data.
I spent a lot of time, along with others, gathering concrete data for CCP in the past. We've been completely ignored by CCP. As such, I've decided to do the same, and am currently completely ignoring the game (except for the odd forum post now and again).
Should there come a time when CCP gets their act together and produces a compelling game that isn't completely swamped by one, dominant, weapon and playstyle, I may return. |
Crimson ShieId
Psygod9
10
|
Posted - 2013.09.12 18:58:00 -
[184] - Quote
Not even bothering to read the entire thread, just wanted to say... My Scrambler Pistol outdoes your AR
Also, I'm sure it's been said a dozen times, but it's not the gun's fault, it's the aim assist that makes the weapon seem so powerful. Nerf that a bit and things will likely die down again. |
Inyanga
Strong-Arm
12
|
Posted - 2013.09.12 20:30:00 -
[185] - Quote
Crimson ShieId wrote:Not even bothering to read the entire thread, just wanted to say... My Scrambler Pistol outdoes your AR Also, I'm sure it's been said a dozen times, but it's not the gun's fault, it's the aim assist that makes the weapon seem so powerful. Nerf that a bit and things will likely die down again.
You replied without reading the Op. really? |
D legendary hero
THE WARRIORS OF LEGEND
966
|
Posted - 2013.09.12 20:37:00 -
[186] - Quote
the ARs dps is too damn high. it needs to be nerfed.
the dps must be 340... the range needs a nerf by 25% the ammo needs a reduction it needs to overheat After continuous fir for 30 bullets
|
CLONE117
Planetary Response Organization Test Friends Please Ignore
340
|
Posted - 2013.09.12 21:35:00 -
[187] - Quote
complaining about a single gun just by dps alone is stupid...very ,very, stupid...
does not need an overheat function...
most fire fights it drains an entire clip and then some to kill some1..
because we have alot of missing involved....
the ar as is doesnt need nerfing just because its dps is just a tiny bit higher than another gun...
it will mostly take around 40 to 60 rounds to kill your average moving player with it...
and this is in the close to mid range section..
longer ranges would probably involve using more than a few 1-2 full clips of ammo so its stupid if some1 is even trying to shoot at you at that range....
since thats where its least effective...
it does minor amounts of damage at that range...
the average dps of the smg, ar, and hmg along with alot of the other guns r very close together..
they all still have the same ability to kill u at the same speeds..
and all these nerf threads involve r stupid nubs who want to nerf a BALANCED GUN just because they lost a stupid proto suit to it....
and so far that is the only real reason why i keep hearing this nerf certain gun crap....
the same happened to lasers..
the same happened to lavs...
and guess what we dont have any more fun free default lavs now..
its because nubs lost a proto suit to them and begged and begged and whined and cried for their removal...
but im at the point at to where i just think every 1 should stop the nerf ar thread crap once and for all..its worse than reading random spam...
and ive pretty much learned my lesson on the fact that its pointless to waste my breath on stupid noobs who want to ruin the game and make it to where their own single full proto playstyle beats all...
and this^ is why the ar is balanced and needs no nerfing...
no more drawback crap it was designed to have some of the least amount of drawbacks possible...
it isnt a super gun...its on even ground when it comes to all the other weapons versus the ar...
the assault rifle wasnt designed to be played as a specific role...
it was designed to by a good weapon that allows players to assault objectives in numbers...
a group of heavies can still devastate the majority ar users heck a group of any weapon users can beat a group of ar users...
the true reason for nerfing the ar is so stupid..
that every1 here in the world is now dummer...having heard of it... |
ShinyJay
Destruction Reapers The Superpowers
79
|
Posted - 2013.09.12 21:42:00 -
[188] - Quote
CLONE117 wrote:complaining about a single gun just by dps alone is stupid...very ,very, stupid...
does not need an overheat function...
most fire fights it drains an entire clip and then some to kill some1..
because we have alot of missing involved....
the ar as is doesnt need nerfing just because its dps is just a tiny bit higher than another gun...
it will mostly take around 40 to 60 rounds to kill your average moving player with it...
and this is in the close to mid range section..
longer ranges would probably involve using more than a few 1-2 full clips of ammo so its stupid if some1 is even trying to shoot at you at that range....
since thats where its least effective...
it does minor amounts of damage at that range...
the average dps of the smg, ar, and hmg along with alot of the other guns r very close together..
they all still have the same ability to kill u at the same speeds..
and all these nerf threads involve r stupid nubs who want to nerf a BALANCED GUN just because they lost a stupid proto suit to it....
and so far that is the only real reason why i keep hearing this nerf certain gun crap....
the same happened to lasers..
the same happened to lavs...
and guess what we dont have any more fun free default lavs now..
its because nubs lost a proto suit to them and begged and begged and whined and cried for their removal...
but im at the point at to where i just think every 1 should stop the nerf ar thread crap once and for all..its worse than reading random spam...
and ive pretty much learned my lesson on the fact that its pointless to waste my breath on stupid noobs who want to ruin the game and make it to where their own single full proto playstyle beats all...
and this^ is why the ar is balanced and needs no nerfing...
no more drawback crap it was designed to have some of the least amount of drawbacks possible...
it isnt a super gun...its on even ground when it comes to all the other weapons versus the ar...
the assault rifle wasnt designed to be played as a specific role...
it was designed to by a good weapon that allows players to assault objectives in numbers...
a group of heavies can still devastate the majority ar users heck a group of any weapon users can beat a group of ar users...
the true reason for nerfing the ar is so stupid..
that every1 here in the world is now dummer...having heard of it...
it's pointless to keep arguing with you cause you just don't see it. i didn't post numbers, and used my personal experiences to back up my claim. you haven't used anything but what other guns are in their roles and niche. the point of the AR in any game is to fill the role of all to a far lesser extent. it's surpassing all other roles and niche where they should be best at, and the AR should be worse.
want to talk about drawbacks? the AR shouldn't excel at all roles and just be decent in them. it over shadows all other guns in their roles, your just too blinded to see that. |
CLONE117
Planetary Response Organization Test Friends Please Ignore
340
|
Posted - 2013.09.12 21:53:00 -
[189] - Quote
it is decent in them.. the reason its so deadly is because most of the time u die to it there also 5 other players with the ar shooting at u also...
it doesnt need any nerfing its fine the way it is...
when a single ar player is trying to solo hes going to get beat by EVERYTHING!..unless that same player is very skilled with the weapon...
the assault rifle is used most of the time by alot of players..
the other guns them selves r basically better than the single ar user.
they just cant stand up to a GROUP of ar users..
and those other weapons SHOULDNT be able to stand solo and win to a group of ar users. UNLESS the player uses tactical wits...
by picking them off one by one until there is no large group if u chuck several grenades at them u will obviously get several kills and scatter alot of them..
it doesnt function well in a 1v1 match..
a gun like the md would perform better...
the gun with the numbers is going to beat the lone wolves majority of the time in a straight up duel..
which is why u need to use tactics to win against them.. your non ar gun may be better than the ar it self overall but it cant stand up to a group of them...
|
D legendary hero
THE WARRIORS OF LEGEND
969
|
Posted - 2013.09.12 21:54:00 -
[190] - Quote
CLONE117 wrote:complaining about a single gun just by dps alone is stupid...very ,very, stupid...
You sir are an idiot. Not only did I mention more than one reason why the AR is OP, but:
- when you nerfed the flaylocks, the only claim it was OP was its splash damage
- the MD was its splash damage
- forge gun is its splash damage
- lazer was the fact that i out gunned ARs in lazer range
- shotguns was that it killed Ars in CQC
- HMG was the dps
basically, you just want to nerf everything because everything does what its designed to do.
Stop trolling my thread bro.
the fact that 1 guy with an AR can take on several people using other guns at the sametime alone in their niche is proof enough its OP |
|
CLONE117
Planetary Response Organization Test Friends Please Ignore
342
|
Posted - 2013.09.12 22:03:00 -
[191] - Quote
D legendary hero wrote:
i am a idiot. Not only did i mention several stupid reason why i want to nerf ar.
i like to troll my own threads
...
^ thats trolling.. |
Arkena Wyrnspire
Turalyon 514 Turalyon Alliance
3161
|
Posted - 2013.09.12 22:05:00 -
[192] - Quote
D legendary hero wrote:CLONE117 wrote:complaining about a single gun just by dps alone is stupid...very ,very, stupid...
You sir are an idiot. Not only did I mention more than one reason why the AR is OP, but:
- when you nerfed the flaylocks, the only claim it was OP was its splash damage
- the MD was its splash damage
- forge gun is its splash damage
- lazer was the fact that i out gunned ARs in lazer range
- shotguns was that it killed Ars in CQC
- HMG was the dps
basically, you just want to nerf everything because everything does what its designed to do. Stop trolling my thread bro. the fact that 1 guy with an AR can take on several people using other guns at the sametime alone in their niche is proof enough its OP
Your reasons were mostly either anecdotal or sourced from really, really bad maths.
Additionally, your defence of your nerfing reasons is literally 'Well, all the other ones were pathetic too so I can be pathetic as well right?'
Notice how three of the articles on the list are due to splash damage. Do you think that might have been more of an over-arching problem with splash weaponry? Instead of considering that, the nerf brigade is whining, and the same mistakes of the past are set to be repeated here - because one group doesn't like another group's weapons, clearly they must be OP.
I find it ironic that you should reason that someone wants to nerf something because 'It does what it's designed to do'. That's... what you're doing here.
Much earlier in the thread, I suggested improvements to your OP, which devolved into an internet argument. I will give you props for being more intelligent than the average internet whiner, but you are a part of the nerf brigade here. |
Orion Vahid
DUST University Ivy League
178
|
Posted - 2013.09.12 22:17:00 -
[193] - Quote
Ahhh...the AR nerf shall be glorious. I can just imagine the tears already |
Cosgar
ParagonX
5187
|
Posted - 2013.09.12 22:18:00 -
[194] - Quote
Orion Vahid wrote:Ahhh...the AR nerf shall be glorious. I can just imagine the tears already It might make me want to reinstall again. |
Arkena Wyrnspire
Turalyon 514 Turalyon Alliance
3161
|
Posted - 2013.09.12 22:19:00 -
[195] - Quote
Cosgar wrote:Orion Vahid wrote:Ahhh...the AR nerf shall be glorious. I can just imagine the tears already It might make me want to reinstall again. Ah, I'd thought your opinions were uninformed. Your confirmation was appreciated. |
D legendary hero
THE WARRIORS OF LEGEND
981
|
Posted - 2013.09.12 22:28:00 -
[196] - Quote
CLONE117 wrote:D legendary hero wrote:
i am a idiot. Not only did i mention several stupid reason why i want to nerf ar.
i like to troll my own threads
... ^ thats trolling..
yeah, and thats why you are getting reported. |
Cosgar
ParagonX
5190
|
Posted - 2013.09.12 22:30:00 -
[197] - Quote
Arkena Wyrnspire wrote:Cosgar wrote:Orion Vahid wrote:Ahhh...the AR nerf shall be glorious. I can just imagine the tears already It might make me want to reinstall again. Ah, I'd thought your opinions were uninformed. Your confirmation was appreciated. I uninstalled today. |
Arkena Wyrnspire
Turalyon 514 Turalyon Alliance
3161
|
Posted - 2013.09.12 22:33:00 -
[198] - Quote
Cosgar wrote:Arkena Wyrnspire wrote:Cosgar wrote:Orion Vahid wrote:Ahhh...the AR nerf shall be glorious. I can just imagine the tears already It might make me want to reinstall again. Ah, I'd thought your opinions were uninformed. Your confirmation was appreciated. I uninstalled today. You know, I used to respect your opinions, until you got onto the nerf brigade bandwagon. |
CLONE117
Planetary Response Organization Test Friends Please Ignore
342
|
Posted - 2013.09.12 22:38:00 -
[199] - Quote
D legendary hero wrote:CLONE117 wrote:D legendary hero wrote:
i am a idiot. Not only did i mention several stupid reason why i want to nerf ar.
i like to troll my own threads
... ^ thats trolling.. yeah, and thats why you are getting reported.
why iv done nothing wrong as i dont troll..
all i did was state the truth with that post...
and it did prove a good but rather poor example of trolling...
and reporting for something this minor?
uve probably been trolling for longer than ive even been playing this game...
so your the only troll/whiner here... |
D legendary hero
THE WARRIORS OF LEGEND
985
|
Posted - 2013.09.12 22:39:00 -
[200] - Quote
Arkena Wyrnspire wrote:D legendary hero wrote:CLONE117 wrote:complaining about a single gun just by dps alone is stupid...very ,very, stupid...
You sir are an idiot. Not only did I mention more than one reason why the AR is OP, but:
- when you nerfed the flaylocks, the only claim it was OP was its splash damage
- the MD was its splash damage
- forge gun is its splash damage
- lazer was the fact that i out gunned ARs in lazer range
- shotguns was that it killed Ars in CQC
- HMG was the dps
basically, you just want to nerf everything because everything does what its designed to do. Stop trolling my thread bro. the fact that 1 guy with an AR can take on several people using other guns at the sametime alone in their niche is proof enough its OP Your reasons were mostly either anecdotal or sourced from really, really bad maths. Additionally, your defence of your nerfing reasons is literally 'Well, all the other ones were pathetic too so I can be pathetic as well right?' Notice how three of the articles on the list are due to splash damage. Do you think that might have been more of an over-arching problem with splash weaponry? Instead of considering that, the nerf brigade is whining, and the same mistakes of the past are set to be repeated here - because one group doesn't like another group's weapons, clearly they must be OP.
ok, I'll humor your blatant disregard for logic and common sense, in this regard because normally you are logical.
morons like you complained about splash damage when hit detection made splash damage horrible. frame rate issues made the explosives fire from the wrong spot, like missle turrets on dropships still do.
in fact most of the math involving the flaylock was horrible and had nothing to do wth how the flaylock operated.
I mean do you even read what you post? do you think before you write? since chromosome AR noobs like you have nerfed systematically, every gun that was annoying them. flaylocks never had more kills that Ars, nor were they more effective except in CQC were they needed to be, but even then it wasn't a big problem since you can strafe at 100% of your movement speed before 1.4.
yet, you Ar noobs did not like the flaylock, so you had it nerfed for no other reason. same for MD, hmg and the list goes on...
Quote:
I find it ironic that you should reason that someone wants to nerf something because 'It does what it's designed to do'. That's... what you're doing here.
oh im sorry, i forgot to read where CCP said the AR is designed to be an I-win button and superior to every other weapon in all respects at the militia level up to proto in every conceiveible situation.
oh...wait.. they didn't? yeah, because ARs aren't designed for that.
Quote: Much earlier in the thread, I suggested improvements to your OP, which devolved into an internet argument. I will give you props for being more intelligent than the average internet whiner, but you are a part of the nerf brigade here.
I appreciated the coments, but I did the research and based on not only the in game experience of most players in cluding myself, the MATH and logic behind the AR proves it is OP.
in the court of law, eye witness testimony, with evidence, and scientific facts generally lead to convictions. the defense for ARs is weak at best and doesn't mitigate its OPness. |
|
Meeko Fent
Seituoda Taskforce Command Caldari State
898
|
Posted - 2013.09.12 22:44:00 -
[201] - Quote
Just rollback the weapon buffs on everything but the breaches.
Problem solved.
Adjust ranges from there. |
D legendary hero
THE WARRIORS OF LEGEND
985
|
Posted - 2013.09.12 22:44:00 -
[202] - Quote
Arkena Wyrnspire wrote:Cosgar wrote:Arkena Wyrnspire wrote:Cosgar wrote:Orion Vahid wrote:Ahhh...the AR nerf shall be glorious. I can just imagine the tears already It might make me want to reinstall again. Ah, I'd thought your opinions were uninformed. Your confirmation was appreciated. I uninstalled today. You know, I used to respect your opinions, until you got onto the nerf brigade bandwagon.
C'mon bro. I know your trying to fight it... But YOU and I BOTH know based on the evidence the AR is OP.
its hard for me to beleive that you don't think its OP. regardless of whether you use AR or not as a logical individual you certainly must be noticing the validity of these arguments.
honestly.. how can you beleive the AR doesn't need a nerf?
- what disadvantages does the AR have?
- why does the ARs current range rival other niche weapons?
- why does the ARs dps at milita level rival that of the HMG?
- why is the Ar more effective than SMGs in CQC, BUT at the same time just as accurate as Scr rifles at 66m?
its impossible for me to beleive you can't see this as OP |
Cosgar
ParagonX
5191
|
Posted - 2013.09.12 22:46:00 -
[203] - Quote
Arkena Wyrnspire wrote:Cosgar wrote:Arkena Wyrnspire wrote:Cosgar wrote:Orion Vahid wrote:Ahhh...the AR nerf shall be glorious. I can just imagine the tears already It might make me want to reinstall again. Ah, I'd thought your opinions were uninformed. Your confirmation was appreciated. I uninstalled today. You know, I used to respect your opinions, until you got onto the nerf brigade bandwagon. I've always been on the re-balance coalition. Why have I been defending logistics, tanks, heavies, scouts, lasers, the MD and the lolPlasma Cannon for all this time? But to be honest, I finally realized that this game is the same **** day in and day out. People cry nerf on something, CCP nerfs it, people cry for something else to be nerfed, CCP nerfs it and so on. If SP investments weren't devalued before, 1.5 has completely done it to the point that a BPO is as effective as millions of SP invested into prototype and I finally had enough. I've been posting a lot less frequently even before 1.5 but I've officially called it quits today and this probably will be my last post until some serious changes are made. In the meantime, I'll probably go back to CoD since it has more depth than Dust right now. |
D legendary hero
THE WARRIORS OF LEGEND
986
|
Posted - 2013.09.12 22:49:00 -
[204] - Quote
Meeko Fent wrote:Just rollback the weapon buffs on everything but the breaches.
Problem solved.
Adjust ranges from there.
I wish we could do this but 1 or both of 2 things will happen. either:
- the increase to TTK will cause shield and armor tankers to complain and then subsequently all weapons save of course ARs will be nerfed
and/Or
- AR users will agree to this to turn the attention off of ARs, but at the time buffs are discussed systematically reject each buff and claim it would make said weapons OP
its a bait and switch. nerf the ARs dps to 340, reduce range by 25%, increase its overheating threshold to that of when 40 bullets are fired in succession it over heats, reduce max ammo from 300 to 250. |
Arkena Wyrnspire
Turalyon 514 Turalyon Alliance
3164
|
Posted - 2013.09.12 22:55:00 -
[205] - Quote
D legendary hero wrote:
ok, I'll humor your blatant disregard for logic and common sense, in this regard because normally you are logical.
morons like you complained about splash damage when hit detection made splash damage horrible. frame rate issues made the explosives fire from the wrong spot, like missle turrets on dropships still do.
in fact most of the math involving the flaylock was horrible and had nothing to do wth how the flaylock operated.
Unloading a large amount of splash damage in under a second wasn't OP? I'll humour your own logical fallacies because you've made an effort here and been more reasonable than I expected.
You've also just explained why the MD was nerfed once (though it was excessive at that stage) - The splash damage wasn't working well at the time, and when it was fixed it was going to be OP. Can you honestly say that the old mass drivers wouldn't have been overwhelming in the current setting? The blast radius of an old freedom could exceed 10m, iirc.
Would you like to show me some maths with the old flaylock stats indicating it was fine? You misunderstand me - I don't necessarily support the other nerfs just because I don't support this one. If you could bring me some solid numbers on the old flaylock I'd be inclined to believe you, now that armour is in a decent place.
Quote: I mean do you even read what you post? do you think before you write? since chromosome AR noobs like you have nerfed systematically, every gun that was annoying them. flaylocks never had more kills that Ars, nor were they more effective except in CQC were they needed to be, but even then it wasn't a big problem since you can strafe at 100% of your movement speed before 1.4.
yet, you Ar noobs did not like the flaylock, so you had it nerfed for no other reason. same for MD, hmg and the list goes on...
I don't even use the AR. I'm simply defending it against the nerf brigade.
Quote: I find it ironic that you should reason that someone wants to nerf something because 'It does what it's designed to do'. That's... what you're doing here.
oh im sorry, i forgot to read where CCP said the AR is designed to be an I-win button and superior to every other weapon in all respects at the militia level up to proto in every conceiveible situation.
oh...wait.. they didn't? yeah, because ARs aren't designed for that. [/quote]
They're not 'superior to every other weapon in all respects'. Not at all. Tell me where the assault rifle destroys tanks, snipes at 200+m. I can easily beat assault rifle users in long range combat with my SCR - I do it regularly. Laser rifles, in their admittedly limited operational range, can melt AR users. Sweeping, strong generalisations like this are rarely even moderately accurate. If the AR was a win button, I would go about 3/20 every match, simply by the ratios. But I don't.
Quote: I appreciated the coments, but I did the research and based on not only the in game experience of most players in cluding myself, the MATH and logic behind the AR proves it is OP.
in the court of law, eye witness testimony, with evidence, and scientific facts generally lead to convictions. the defense for ARs is weak at best and doesn't mitigate its OPness.
You didn't do the research. The simple fact that you're plugging in a 10% modifier twice proves this. If you had done your research, for example, you would know that the 10% damage was put directly into the weapon. You may also want to note that this doesn't affect your beloved HMG either - there is no 10% damage increase on that or the AR.
Similarly, you would also be aware that the ASCR does a very similar amount of dps to the AR. The overheat mechanic hardly applies when you have to fire two clips without stopping to manage it
In a court of law, anecdotes and heavily biased 'evidence' tends to get people looking oddly at the prosecution. That doesn't apply here, of course, because the vast majority of forum-goers are unaware that they can breathe through their nose and most of those others are feeling retributive about perceived unjust nerfs. They may well have been unjust, but retributive nerfs of more weapons isn't an answer. |
CLONE117
Planetary Response Organization Test Friends Please Ignore
342
|
Posted - 2013.09.12 22:58:00 -
[206] - Quote
ok this is just getting ridiculous
i think its time this idiotic thread gets locked...
your part of the problem on why the game is dieing..
ar is most numerous and players rnt obliterating with it...
if u cant see that then u are obviously part of the nerf brigade problem...
the math u do is stupid pointless and overall flawed..
a large group of any weapon users can actually dominate the field but the ar users r the most numerous because everybody that starts out on the game HAS THE ASSAULT RIFLE...
thus one of the reasons it requires no nerfs..
rarely do i die to an ar.. when i do its when im hacking an objective or accidentally ran into a large group of them.
so there is no proper reason to nerf the ar as all the reason u have come up with so far are pointless..
math or no math...
the reason to defend ar is weak but so are the even WEAKER reasons to nerf it....
all ive seen so far is the "i want ar nerfed because i ran into a barrage of gunfire from 50 ars and got killed! and lost my precious proto suit' excuse...
that is infact the only reason that i can see on why u want to nerf it so bad.. |
Arkena Wyrnspire
Turalyon 514 Turalyon Alliance
3164
|
Posted - 2013.09.12 23:05:00 -
[207] - Quote
D legendary hero wrote:
C'mon bro. I know your trying to fight it... But YOU and I BOTH know based on the evidence the AR is OP.
its hard for me to beleive that you don't think its OP. regardless of whether you use AR or not as a logical individual you certainly must be noticing the validity of these arguments.
honestly.. how can you beleive the AR doesn't need a nerf?
Let me stop you there. I'm not completely convinced the AR shouldn't be nerfed. What I am convinced of, 100%, is that your proposed nerfs are far too heavy handed, and that the arguments being made are flawed.
- what disadvantages does the AR have?
Nothing major. It's meant to be a jack of all trades. The concept is problematic, yes.
- why does the ARs current range rival other niche weapons?
It doesn't. If you look at this graph, you can see that the long ranged weapon system, the laser rifle, outperforms it at range. The ludicrous damage drop-off on the weapon is another problem altogether.
- why does the ARs dps at milita level rival that of the HMG?
It doesn't. The HMG outdpses the AR by a significant amount. The problem here is that the HMG dispersion is insane.
- why is the Ar more effective than SMGs in CQC, BUT at the same time just as accurate as Scr rifles at 66m?
Let me tell you as someone who mains the SCR that at 60+m, I have yet to meet an automatic AR user who could best me in straight combat.
Quote: its impossible for me to beleive you can't see this as OP
I see it as OP in some ways. I don't see it as nearly OP enough to warrant the kind of heavy-handed nerf you're proposing. |
Meeko Fent
Seituoda Taskforce Command Caldari State
898
|
Posted - 2013.09.13 00:06:00 -
[208] - Quote
CLONE117 wrote:ok this is just getting ridiculous
i think its time this idiotic thread gets locked... Mmk. I will listen to you for the fact you are going to start overheating.
your part of the problem on why the game is dieing..
ar is most numerous and players rnt obliterating with it...
if u cant see that then u are obviously part of the nerf brigade problem...
the math u do is stupid pointless and overall flawed..
a large group of any weapon users can actually dominate the field but the ar users r the most numerous because everybody that starts out on the game HAS THE ASSAULT RIFLE... So... a group of NKers can dominate the field? How about some SGers. Or some LRmen, some SMGers, Snipers, MDers? No. They have a range in which they can be counter in. The AR, the only counter is just more HP, or a bigger gun.
thus one of the reasons it requires no nerfs..
rarely do i die to an ar.. when i do its when im hacking an objective or accidentally ran into a large group of them.
so there is no proper reason to nerf the ar as all the reason u have come up with so far are pointless..
math or no math... Why? everything in this ******* game has been nerfed into nonexistence based on the fact that the math said so. Why is the AR any different?
the reason to defend ar is weak but so are the even WEAKER reasons to nerf it....
all ive seen so far is the "i want ar nerfed because i ran into a barrage of gunfire from 50 ars and got killed! and lost my precious proto suit' excuse... You know, that's the same excuse for nerfing the HMG, the FG, the MD, the LAVs, the HAVs, the Heavy Suits, the Light Suits.... The list goes on. Why is the AR exempt from it?
that is infact the only reason that i can see on why u want to nerf it so bad..
|
matsumoto yuichi san
SVER True Blood Public Disorder.
23
|
Posted - 2013.09.13 00:29:00 -
[209] - Quote
i have and will continue to say it's the dispersion
it puts wayy to many rounds on target with no drawbacks you shouldn't be able to hold the trigger and keep it on the head like you can now, (almost no input even moving with AA too)
so as it has been AR full auto does too much too well
more diespersion = less dps further out so would have to be in shotgun range to manage that full dps and even then would need effort |
INFINITE DIVERSITY IDIC
TYRANNY of EVIL MEN
41
|
Posted - 2013.09.13 00:33:00 -
[210] - Quote
Godin Thekiller wrote:That's ******* sad. I knew it was bad, but this is just sad.......... No his math is wrong, his logic is flawed and only considers dps which is not the only consideration by a long shot. This is the homework of a baddy who needs to get better. And who told you all weapons were supposed to be equal? Thts why you have a choice, ya you get less range and you overheat, with a heavy, you also can carry about 1600 hp there's an advantage that comes with the heavy I don't get in my suit with my ar, there's much more too, this is all just lame qqing bc of aim assist, where was all this before aim assist?
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 11 12 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |