| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 |
321. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Hull Progression - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Breakin Stuff wrote: sp costs I'm against making vehicles cost more SP myself. They're already expensive in terms of sp and SP spent on them isn't spent on infantry skills which are more applicable. The 'equalising factor' for sp should be th...
- by MINA Longstrike - at 2015.02.07 14:47:00
|
322. Suggestion for active scanners. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
There's a pro scanner that with gallogi 5 has 21db strength and a 30 second uptime.
- by MINA Longstrike - at 2015.02.07 04:04:00
|
323. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Hull Progression - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Pokey Dravon wrote: MINA Longstrike wrote: It is odd but its much better than current operation skill which shaves of 15/100ths of a second which is negligible, reloading is the primary drawback to a plc. I will admit that the benefit of ...
- by MINA Longstrike - at 2015.02.06 22:42:00
|
324. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Hull Progression - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Pokey Dravon wrote: MINA Longstrike wrote: Standardize plc charge time at .45s, change operation skill to 3% reload per level, up damage by one tier level (so basic does current adv damage, which is +~170 damage per tier upgrade). It puts th...
- by MINA Longstrike - at 2015.02.06 22:18:00
|
325. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Hull Progression - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Standardize plc charge time at .45s, change operation skill to 3% reload per level, up damage by one tier level (so basic does current adv damage, which is +~170 damage per tier upgrade). It puts the plc in a better place without making it op vs i...
- by MINA Longstrike - at 2015.02.06 21:52:00
|
326. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Hull Progression - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Pokey Dravon wrote: MINA Longstrike wrote: Pokey Dravon wrote: Breakin Stuff wrote: I think we're digging in our asses a little deeply to justify things guys. MBTs are reasonably speedy now. all the UHAVs would need to slow down would...
- by MINA Longstrike - at 2015.02.06 21:09:00
|
327. Taxonomy of Dust 514 - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Iron Wolf Saber wrote: Should also note that some manufacuters favor a name style well at times generally expressed with the tech 2 ships of new eden so that could be something to use for your own naming schemes. I tried to update the big lis...
- by MINA Longstrike - at 2015.02.06 19:52:00
|
328. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Hull Progression - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Pokey Dravon wrote: Breakin Stuff wrote: I think we're digging in our asses a little deeply to justify things guys. MBTs are reasonably speedy now. all the UHAVs would need to slow down would be 20-30% speed loss AT THE ABSOLUTE MOST. Beca...
- by MINA Longstrike - at 2015.02.06 18:06:00
|
329. [Feedback] This is a neat idea. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Corbina Ninja wrote: An intelligent way to monetize this game! sell vanity item like: forum and ingame avatar, weapon camo and visual effect, eye's light colors Have suggested this multiple times. The nifty thing about a 'Skin' Slot is that...
- by MINA Longstrike - at 2015.02.06 17:52:00
|
330. [Feedback] This is a neat idea. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Possible to do with guns as well?
- by MINA Longstrike - at 2015.02.06 14:59:00
|
331. Experimental Lab (Over 150 days to generate 1 Standard AV Nade) - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Corrospondence with eve team on manufacturing more be gud.
- by MINA Longstrike - at 2015.02.06 03:23:00
|
332. Experimental Lab (Over 150 days to generate 1 Standard AV Nade) - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
I can understand the grievances about RNG, crafting systems should be relatively consistent rather than horrible whackamole.
- by MINA Longstrike - at 2015.02.06 03:15:00
|
333. [Feedback] AURLords 1.0 - Why players despise the warbarge - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Sgt Kirk wrote: CCP Rattati wrote: I will be honest, there is nothing in the OP we have not said we wanted to do. This was always the needed foundation and first step. So good that you agree... The players, true reaction, ie warbarge upgra...
- by MINA Longstrike - at 2015.02.06 03:11:00
|
334. Request: Monetized RNG player trading / aurlords 1.0 review - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
I would like to see a player tradingTM system where in order to make a trade both players have to pay aurum and there is about an 80/20 chance of the item getting 'Scotty errored' or otherwise lost in transit and not making it to the intended re...
- by MINA Longstrike - at 2015.02.06 03:08:00
|
335. Upper limit to wp -> sp conversion - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Seems to be a cutoff at around 4000-4500 sp. I just had a match on my amarr logi alt where I legit earned 5548 warpoints (in a two man squad) and only ended up earning 20900 sp (a match two days ago ended up yielding 17k sp for 3000 wps). The cut...
- by MINA Longstrike - at 2015.02.05 21:45:00
|
336. Sticky:[Feedback] Full Balance of Large Turrets - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Harpyja wrote: CCP Rattati wrote: what is your feeling on blaster ROF, not DPS, just feeling. do you generally like the dum dum dum dum dum (current) or you prefer dum...dum...dum...dum more like an APC turret from other fpss or dum.......
- by MINA Longstrike - at 2015.02.05 19:23:00
|
337. Sticky:[Feedback] Full Balance of Large Turrets - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Spkr4theDead wrote: MINA Longstrike wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: words Go away. If you don't like what I have to say, then just block me on here, problem solved. You're essentially covering your ears and saying "la la la I can't hear...
- by MINA Longstrike - at 2015.02.05 18:20:00
|
338. Flaylock: more splash and damage than the large missile. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Tanks aren't supposed to kill infantry Spkr. You know this.
- by MINA Longstrike - at 2015.02.05 18:06:00
|
339. Taxonomy of Dust 514 - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
I wouldn't really think any of the vehicles fall into the 'tech two' category though, would they? If so I still don't believe they have designated manufacturers.
- by MINA Longstrike - at 2015.02.05 18:05:00
|
340. Taxonomy of Dust 514 - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Gallente Vehicle Names: This list will end up mostly using its current names, largely because the vast majority of them were 'correct' to begin with, a few replacements might occur if I cant pick out the original origin of a name or if the origina...
- by MINA Longstrike - at 2015.02.05 17:56:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |