DUST Search - Flaylock: more splash and damage than the large missile.

All Channels

Feedback/Requests

Flaylock: more splash and damage than the large missile.

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Spkr4theDead Red Star. 2869	Posted - 2015.02.05 13:15:00 - [1] - Quote Why is this? Why does an explosive projectile the size of a golf ball do more damage and have a larger radius than a missile the size of a human, with its warhead probably the size of a human head? Nope. Confirming that pilot input is not, and never was, valued. - Breakin Stuff
CommanderBolt KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION 3130	Posted - 2015.02.05 13:22:00 - [2] - Quote Balance. (Not that it is achieved here regardless ) Vitantur Nothus wrote: Why hide a solution under frothy pile of derpa? MY LIFE FOR AIUR!
Adipem Nothi Nos Nothi 6392	Posted - 2015.02.05 14:14:00 - [3] - Quote Low Velocity, Anti-Personnel vs High Velocity, Armor-Piercing Also Balance (which I've heard is a personal favorite of yours). Shoot scout with yes. - Ripley Riley
Alaika Arbosa Minmatar Republic 2459	Posted - 2015.02.05 14:17:00 - [4] - Quote The missile warhead is **** Caldari manufacturing. The warhead on the Flaylock rocket is a triumph of Sebiestor engineering. We the pc players make up a huge majority of active players. --Roman837 ^^ROFLMAO OMG I need to catch my breath now..
DeathwindRising ROGUE RELICS VP Gaming Alliance 855	Posted - 2015.02.05 16:09:00 - [5] - Quote Alaika Arbosa wrote: The missile warhead is **** Caldari manufacturing. The warhead on the Flaylock rocket is a triumph of Sebiestor engineering. rusty junk ass min tech... im surprised it doesnt blow up in your hand when you fire it
Alaika Arbosa Minmatar Republic 2460	Posted - 2015.02.05 16:16:00 - [6] - Quote DeathwindRising wrote: Alaika Arbosa wrote: The missile warhead is **** Caldari manufacturing. The warhead on the Flaylock rocket is a triumph of Sebiestor engineering. rusty junk ass min tech... im surprised it doesnt blow up in your hand when you fire it /facepalm You do realize that the Sebiestor are quite possibly the best engineers in all New Eden right? We the pc players make up a huge majority of active players. --Roman837 ^^ROFLMAO OMG I need to catch my breath now..
Spkr4theDead Red Star. 2870	Posted - 2015.02.05 16:16:00 - [7] - Quote Adipem Nothi wrote: Low Velocity, Anti-Personnel vs High Velocity, Armor-Piercing If they were armor piercing, they would be more like railgun rounds rather than explosive warheads. Nope. Confirming that pilot input is not, and never was, valued. - Breakin Stuff
MINA Longstrike Kirjuun Heiian 2084	Posted - 2015.02.05 18:06:00 - [8] - Quote Tanks aren't supposed to kill infantry Spkr. You know this. Hnolai ki tuul, ti sei oni a tiu. Kirjuun Heiian. I have a few alts.
Adipem Nothi Nos Nothi 6400	Posted - 2015.02.05 18:17:00 - [9] - Quote Spkr4theDead wrote: Adipem Nothi wrote: Low Velocity, Anti-Personnel vs High Velocity, Armor-Piercing If they were armor piercing, they would be more like railgun rounds rather than explosive warheads. Perhaps I should've said "anti armor" rather than "armor piercing". And by armor, I mean vehicles which are resistant to small arms fire. The missile turret excels at destroying armor. The flaylock pistol excels at destroying infantry. Shoot scout with yes. - Ripley Riley
Spkr4theDead Red Star. 2875	Posted - 2015.02.05 19:39:00 - [10] - Quote Adipem Nothi wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: Adipem Nothi wrote: Low Velocity, Anti-Personnel vs High Velocity, Armor-Piercing If they were armor piercing, they would be more like railgun rounds rather than explosive warheads. Perhaps I should've said "anti armor" rather than "armor piercing". And by armor, I mean vehicles which are resistant to small arms fire. The missile turret excels at destroying armor. The flaylock pistol excels at destroying infantry. But why does a golf ball have more splash and do more damage than a missile the size of a person? Nope. Confirming that pilot input is not, and never was, valued. - Breakin Stuff

Spkr4theDead Red Star. 2875	Posted - 2015.02.05 19:40:00 - [11] - Quote MINA Longstrike wrote: Tanks aren't supposed to kill infantry Spkr. You know this. So even though I can aim with all the turrets, I'm not allowed to kill infantry? Nope. Confirming that pilot input is not, and never was, valued. - Breakin Stuff
Arkena Wyrnspire Fatal Absolution 21752	Posted - 2015.02.05 19:41:00 - [12] - Quote Alaika Arbosa wrote: DeathwindRising wrote: Alaika Arbosa wrote: The missile warhead is **** Caldari manufacturing. The warhead on the Flaylock rocket is a triumph of Sebiestor engineering. rusty junk ass min tech... im surprised it doesnt blow up in your hand when you fire it /facepalm You do realize that the Sebiestor are quite possibly the best engineers in all New Eden right? This is ludicrously untrue. :Bittervetting intensifies:
Atiim Titans of Phoenix 15479	Posted - 2015.02.05 19:48:00 - [13] - Quote Well for starters the Flaylock has a 4 round magazine with a max range of about 20m while the Missiles have 12 round capacity, faster projectile speed and range. Not to mention that the Flaylock was designed for Anti-Personnel use, while the Missile Launcher was designed for Anti-Vehicle. Arkena Wyrnspire wrote: This is ludicrously untrue. She could be RPing as a someone with a heavy sense of nationalism. The 1st Matari Commando -HAND
el OPERATOR Capital Acquisitions LLC Bad Intention 787	Posted - 2015.02.05 20:20:00 - [14] - Quote smh Because QQ, dude. QQ. Here's one: Why does a PLC glob which is obviously the size of a Heavy torso need almost pinpoint accuracy to register as a hit? Why don't near-misses by the actual round (in the center of the glob) still register as splash damage from the rest of that ball moving through a target? Open-Beta Vet. Drunk Night Tree Burner. This is my Main and Original. DUST514 is WARFARE, not WAR-FAIR.
One Eyed King Nos Nothi 7643	Posted - 2015.02.05 20:24:00 - [15] - Quote Spkr4theDead wrote: Adipem Nothi wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: Adipem Nothi wrote: Low Velocity, Anti-Personnel vs High Velocity, Armor-Piercing If they were armor piercing, they would be more like railgun rounds rather than explosive warheads. Perhaps I should've said "anti armor" rather than "armor piercing". And by armor, I mean vehicles which are resistant to small arms fire. The missile turret excels at destroying armor. The flaylock pistol excels at destroying infantry. But why does a golf ball have more splash and do more damage than a missile the size of a person? Why do massive armored behemoths move so fast? Why do those incredibly heavy turrets spin around so easily? Former CEO of the Land of the BIind. Any double entendre is unintended I assure you.
Spkr4theDead Red Star. 2876	Posted - 2015.02.05 20:33:00 - [16] - Quote One Eyed King wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: Adipem Nothi wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: Adipem Nothi wrote: Low Velocity, Anti-Personnel vs High Velocity, Armor-Piercing If they were armor piercing, they would be more like railgun rounds rather than explosive warheads. Perhaps I should've said "anti armor" rather than "armor piercing". And by armor, I mean vehicles which are resistant to small arms fire. The missile turret excels at destroying armor. The flaylock pistol excels at destroying infantry. But why does a golf ball have more splash and do more damage than a missile the size of a person? Why do massive armored behemoths move so fast? Why do those incredibly heavy turrets spin around so easily? M1A1 Abrams travels 45 mph on a road. Why shouldn't a tank 20,000 years in the future travel just as fast or faster? Nope. Confirming that pilot input is not, and never was, valued. - Breakin Stuff
Pokey Dravon OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention 4761	Posted - 2015.02.05 20:41:00 - [17] - Quote Spkr4theDead wrote: Adipem Nothi wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: Adipem Nothi wrote: Low Velocity, Anti-Personnel vs High Velocity, Armor-Piercing If they were armor piercing, they would be more like railgun rounds rather than explosive warheads. Perhaps I should've said "anti armor" rather than "armor piercing". And by armor, I mean vehicles which are resistant to small arms fire. The missile turret excels at destroying armor. The flaylock pistol excels at destroying infantry. But why does a golf ball have more splash and do more damage than a missile the size of a person? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shaped_charge http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fragmentation_grenade Different kind of explosives, entirely different function. "That little s**t Pokey..." --CCP Rattati, Biomassed Episode 032 Dust514 // Podcast www.biomassed.net
One Eyed King Nos Nothi 7643	Posted - 2015.02.05 20:48:00 - [18] - Quote Spkr4theDead wrote: One Eyed King wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: But why does a golf ball have more splash and do more damage than a missile the size of a person? Why do massive armored behemoths move so fast? Why do those incredibly heavy turrets spin around so easily? M1A1 Abrams travels 45 mph on a road. Why shouldn't a tank 20,000 years in the future travel just as fast or faster? Why wouldn't a golf ball size explosive 20,000 years in the future do that kind of damage? Former CEO of the Land of the BIind. Any double entendre is unintended I assure you.
Vesta Opalus T.H.I.R.D R.O.C.K General Tso's Alliance 391	Posted - 2015.02.05 21:02:00 - [19] - Quote One Eyed King wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: Adipem Nothi wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: Adipem Nothi wrote: Low Velocity, Anti-Personnel vs High Velocity, Armor-Piercing If they were armor piercing, they would be more like railgun rounds rather than explosive warheads. Perhaps I should've said "anti armor" rather than "armor piercing". And by armor, I mean vehicles which are resistant to small arms fire. The missile turret excels at destroying armor. The flaylock pistol excels at destroying infantry. But why does a golf ball have more splash and do more damage than a missile the size of a person? Why do massive armored behemoths move so fast? Why do those incredibly heavy turrets spin around so easily? Why is the sky blue? Why do people hurt each other?
TooMany Names AlreadyTaken Going for the gold 683	Posted - 2015.02.05 21:40:00 - [20] - Quote Logical that High-Explosive shells will do more splash damage than Armor-Piercing ones. Hidden in the dark, I sit still, polishing my knife, waiting for you to walk by.

Spkr4theDead Red Star. 2876	Posted - 2015.02.06 00:25:00 - [21] - Quote TooMany Names AlreadyTaken wrote: Logical that High-Explosive shells will do more splash damage than Armor-Piercing ones. It's a golf ball vs a man-sized missile. Nope. Confirming that pilot input is not, and never was, valued. - Breakin Stuff
Kallas Hallytyr Skullbreakers 1305	Posted - 2015.02.06 00:34:00 - [22] - Quote Spkr4theDead wrote: TooMany Names AlreadyTaken wrote: Logical that High-Explosive shells will do more splash damage than Armor-Piercing ones. It's a golf ball vs a man-sized missile. More like golf ball and head sized charges. And if you can aim, you're generally getting direct hits with a large missile turret. Getting splash to affect infantry is hard from such an angle, you're better going for direct hits. Which do a lot more damage and are capable of obliterating heavy vehicles. Maybe that's why? Alt of Halla Murr. Sentinel.
taxi bastard Amarr Templars Amarr Empire 388	Posted - 2015.02.06 00:52:00 - [23] - Quote why don't tanks get module damage, disabled or get tracked? how can the driver both drive and operate the gun? "Attention Axiom shoppers try red its the new blue" - WALL-E https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h1BQPV-iCkU CCP's update
DRT 99 Storm Wind Strikeforce Caldari State 46	Posted - 2015.02.06 01:27:00 - [24] - Quote Because armor piercing rounds have neglegible splash. A better comparison would be to the breach flaylocks splash damage. You know. Compare shaped charges to shaped charges.
Spkr4theDead Red Star. 2878	Posted - 2015.02.06 01:46:00 - [25] - Quote One Eyed King wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: One Eyed King wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: But why does a golf ball have more splash and do more damage than a missile the size of a person? Why do massive armored behemoths move so fast? Why do those incredibly heavy turrets spin around so easily? M1A1 Abrams travels 45 mph on a road. Why shouldn't a tank 20,000 years in the future travel just as fast or faster? Why wouldn't a golf ball size explosive 20,000 years in the future do that kind of damage? Also, it takes 7 seconds for an Abrams to reach less than half of its top speed. 20,000 years in the future. You really think it's going to have the same motor? Nope. Confirming that pilot input is not, and never was, valued. - Breakin Stuff
DeathwindRising ROGUE RELICS VP Gaming Alliance 860	Posted - 2015.02.06 01:59:00 - [26] - Quote Alaika Arbosa wrote: DeathwindRising wrote: Alaika Arbosa wrote: The missile warhead is **** Caldari manufacturing. The warhead on the Flaylock rocket is a triumph of Sebiestor engineering. rusty junk ass min tech... im surprised it doesnt blow up in your hand when you fire it /facepalm You do realize that the Sebiestor are quite possibly the best engineers in all New Eden right? Lies. You guys barely manage space travel lol


Pages: [1] :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online/DUST514, the EVE/DUST514 logo, EVE/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to OMG Labs to use EVE Online/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, OMG Labs. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.

MY LIFE FOR AIUR!