| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
2161. 1.7 Tanker contact with CCP. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Iron Wolf Saber wrote: MUDFLAPS McGILLICUTTY wrote: Since you're attempting to compare actual tanks with Dust tanks, here ya go: Reactive Armor: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AUVnNk0aJBE Trophy Active Protective System: http://www.youtu...
- by Harpyja - at 2013.10.16 05:16:00
|
2162. 1.7 Missile tanks: 12 round clip and .15s fire interval, will make large missile... - in General Discussions [original thread]
1.8s to fire entire clip, 10s reload with zero skills. Missiles will have the highest burst DPS. Also, terrible blast radius, which I'm hoping is a joke. @True Adamance: you'll need an Amarr hull to make a Khanid Vehicle. @pyramidhead: I'm not s...
- by Harpyja - at 2013.10.16 05:07:00
|
2163. 1.7 Tanker contact with CCP. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Iron Wolf Saber wrote: Void Echo wrote: because they were fighting a 50 ton vehicle with hardeners and repps on that are more powerful than a dropsuit module. tell me how a single guy throwing AV nades at me killing me in 3 seconds is balan...
- by Harpyja - at 2013.10.16 04:53:00
|
2164. Announcement:Vehicle Changes and Beyond - Part 2 - in General Discussions [original thread]
I hope CCP realizes their mistake of making large missiles having a 1.5m blast radius... and bumps it up to 4m
- by Harpyja - at 2013.10.16 04:17:00
|
2165. 1.7 Tanker contact with CCP. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Sir Dukey wrote: If a thread is made about abolishing 1.7 and has 30 signatures, 1.7 will be abolished. 1.7 is making tanks a bigger sp sink and nerfing tanks into the groud to a point where they have to retreat to the red line for 2 minutes af...
- by Harpyja - at 2013.10.16 01:05:00
|
2166. [Request] Vehicle E-War Turrets - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Logi tanks. That sounds interesting. Right now I'm imagining something equivalent to a modern support vehicle with, for example, radar.
- by Harpyja - at 2013.10.15 13:29:00
|
2167. As per Flying Pig's Request One Amarr Tank with a dust buddy to boot. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Fire of Prometheus wrote: I like the picture that IWS showed us more than the actual pic from ccp. The one from ccp looks to "squished" it seems to narrow to be a tank. I must disagree, I like CCP's concept art better. It looks sleeker. Amar...
- by Harpyja - at 2013.10.15 04:21:00
|
2168. Think of tanks like this... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Hmmm, this thread exploded into quite the discussion in under 24 hours. Alright, so not everyone is in agreement with each other (stopped reading at page 4).(Edit: hmm, just saw the above post ) Why don't we simply let CCP do the talking with t...
- by Harpyja - at 2013.10.15 03:49:00
|
2169. Think of tanks like this... - in General Discussions [original thread]
*slaps OP* *slaps OP* *slaps OP* "I'll stop when you stop the posts, Ok?" *slaps OP* ......
- by Harpyja - at 2013.10.14 14:15:00
|
2170. Tanking is more fun in BF4 - in General Discussions [original thread]
gbghg wrote: the flying is pretty good too, i'm in love with the little bird's handling, feels so responsive. I tried flying and I crashed almost immediately. Controls were switched a little from BF3 (PC- roll and yaw were switched and gave ...
- by Harpyja - at 2013.10.14 14:04:00
|
2171. Announcement:Vehicle Changes and Beyond - Part 2 - in General Discussions [original thread]
KalOfTheRathi wrote: Harpyja wrote: -- snip -- Don't expect an increase blast radius for explosive missiles, @Harpyia. They used to have larger radius in Beta. It decimated infantry and there were oceans of QQ on these forums. The blas...
- by Harpyja - at 2013.10.14 13:17:00
|
2172. Announcement:Vehicle Changes and Beyond - Part 2 - in General Discussions [original thread]
Hey CCP, Any chance large missile blast radius can be increased? It's blast radius is extremely small for an explosive weapon. A kinetic projectile (railgun) should not have a larger "blast" radius than an explosive missile. We also rely mostly...
- by Harpyja - at 2013.10.11 03:09:00
|
2173. (CCP:beta vets) = (nerdy drama girl in highschool:mathlete team captain) - in General Discussions [original thread]
CharCharOdell wrote: It's a metaphor for our relationship. <3000 players at peak hours, recently, but the core group of maybe 1500 has been here through it all. We stuck through the TAR, (uprising in general...lol 1.0/1.4), flaylock spam, c...
- by Harpyja - at 2013.10.10 13:08:00
|
2174. Announcement:Vehicle Changes and Beyond - Part 2 - in General Discussions [original thread]
Void Echo wrote: -snip- Wow. Quite the post. Almost all 6000 characters used. I don't understand why you are so negative about these changes? Also, it seems like you keep forgetting that AV is getting balanced as well, so stop comparing these...
- by Harpyja - at 2013.10.10 12:52:00
|
2175. Discussion on 1.6 , 1.7 - in General Discussions [original thread]
Hellkeizer wrote: Nothing is going to be new and it's probably going to hurt the game because of the vehicle reset Edit: stat resets Though you may not be excited, I for sure am. I mean, fully automatic large missile turrets and shield boost...
- by Harpyja - at 2013.10.10 04:04:00
|
2176. 10 Point Hack assist for all within 10m of the objective for 50% of the hack time - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Borne Velvalor wrote: deezy dabest wrote: Borne Velvalor wrote: 10 points isn't much. Maybe 25? Theres alot of potential for serious farming at that much. A squad COULD pull 350 points with one hack at that (100 for hack / 50 for assis...
- by Harpyja - at 2013.10.08 18:45:00
|
2177. [ Feedback ] 1.5 (1.6) - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Weapon balancing has been pushed back to 1.7 I believe
- by Harpyja - at 2013.10.08 18:41:00
|
2178. Small turrets on Tanks - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
It's been confirmed: you won't be required to fit small turrets in a future update (1.6 or 1.7). Not fitting a small turret removes that seat.
- by Harpyja - at 2013.10.07 20:39:00
|
2179. Petition to keep the Assault Dropship in during vehicle balancing. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Even though my Python was immense fun, I believe that it's temporary removal is for the better. Let CCP pave the way for fighters and the true gunship (which for me is the equivalent to an AC-130).
- by Harpyja - at 2013.10.07 13:04:00
|
2180. The thread for those guys you always see on the forums but never in game - in General Discussions [original thread]
Shall I be glad I'm not on this list? Because I have a valid excuse for not being on for a few months at a time
- by Harpyja - at 2013.10.07 05:00:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |