| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
841. [Hotfix Echo] Sagaris - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
True Adamance wrote: Arkena Wyrnspire wrote: The old Sagaris stats were: 3120 shields 1000 armour 24 HP/s shield regen 365 CPU 1840 PG 5 high slots 3 low slots However, the Sagaris existed at a time when vehicles worked very, very differe...
- by DeathwindRising - at 2014.12.09 22:57:00
|
842. [Hotfix Echo] Sagaris - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
what stats would we want? (realistically of course) anyone have the old that can post them here for reference?
- by DeathwindRising - at 2014.12.09 21:34:00
|
843. [Request on new EWAR System] PLEASE REPLY RATTATI - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Sir Dukey wrote: Give the scout back it's scan range while cloaked since the new system is coming out. The current scout+ewar+cloak isn't working out. It nerfs the scouts that actually play ewar. When I play ewar I usually have really low HP an...
- by DeathwindRising - at 2014.12.09 21:17:00
|
844. [Feedback] New Minor Flux Warbarge Strike - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Mad Syringe wrote: Vulpes Dolosus wrote: It may be an error with the cursor and camera angle. For example, if you go to the map and place your curser on the far edge then center it by moving the camera, the cursor will be in a different spot...
- by DeathwindRising - at 2014.12.09 21:14:00
|
845. [Feedback] New Minor Flux Warbarge Strike - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
maybe. i tried moving the cursor a few times to make sure i was centered over my target, but i still ended up needing to hit the area a couple times
- by DeathwindRising - at 2014.12.09 16:59:00
|
846. What I think of the new patch after 5 matches - in General Discussions [original thread]
idk about the scans not being good enough since i run 4 proto flux scans for my entire team
- by DeathwindRising - at 2014.12.09 16:48:00
|
847. What I think of the new patch after 5 matches - in General Discussions [original thread]
CCP Rattati wrote: Sounds like the play counterplay is coming well into effect. I am already thinking about marauder mammoth tanks from C&C and the team needing to laser strike them double barrel main cannons with missile launchers!? ye...
- by DeathwindRising - at 2014.12.09 16:45:00
|
848. [Request on new EWAR System] PLEASE REPLY RATTATI - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
CCP Rattati wrote: yes, with more scanning around, this may be a time to lessen the penalty. Scouts, feel free to propose stuff! just a curious question.... why do nova knives have a 9ft attack range? is it a sword, or do we really have 9ft ...
- by DeathwindRising - at 2014.12.09 16:43:00
|
849. [Feedback] New Minor Flux Warbarge Strike - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
its very hard to hit anything with it. im not sure if it needs a increase in the number of strikes (3-5), or an increase in radius. overall though ive repeatedly struck the same area ( the top of a water tower) hoping to clear it of uplinks and e...
- by DeathwindRising - at 2014.12.09 16:40:00
|
850. CCP Rattati on the Biomasses Podcast - in General Discussions [original thread]
Vulpes Dolosus wrote: Rattati wrote: Scouts are the EWAR specialist. Yet the Cal scout struggles to beat out the Logistics class in terms of scan range (scan precision not taken since they can both scan meds and heavies and not scan scouts...
- by DeathwindRising - at 2014.12.08 12:26:00
|
851. [CCP RATTATI] wheres your data? - in General Discussions [original thread]
THE-PIMP-NAMED-SLICKBACK wrote: Below the bar. You're welcome for that profound, insightful information its beast for sure. but i cant go 24/2 with it like i can with the RR
- by DeathwindRising - at 2014.12.03 11:19:00
|
852. Overused Gëá Overpowered - in General Discussions [original thread]
Cat Merc wrote: Her Chosen wrote: CCP Rattati wrote: Her Chosen wrote: To CCP, underused means UP. Overused means OP. They thought the bolt pistol was UP because it wasn't used, so they buffed it. So, the HMG and SG are technically t...
- by DeathwindRising - at 2014.12.03 11:15:00
|
853. [CCP RATTATI] wheres your data? - in General Discussions [original thread]
ive seen a number of odd changes lately but, i still want your RR data post the nerfs you made to it. wheres is it now, in terms of usage?
- by DeathwindRising - at 2014.12.03 10:59:00
|
854. Overused Gëá Overpowered - in General Discussions [original thread]
Cat Merc wrote: Her Chosen wrote: CCP Rattati wrote: Her Chosen wrote: To CCP, underused means UP. Overused means OP. They thought the bolt pistol was UP because it wasn't used, so they buffed it. So, the HMG and SG are technically t...
- by DeathwindRising - at 2014.12.03 10:56:00
|
855. Sticky:[Feedback] EWAR Concentric Circle Scan Falloff Design - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
This looks messier and messier each time I see it. What is the goal of these changes in regard to "ewar" overall?
- by DeathwindRising - at 2014.12.02 05:12:00
|
856. Sticky:[Feedback] EWAR Concentric Circle Scan Falloff Design - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Vitantur Nothus wrote: CCP Rattati wrote: Vitantur Nothus wrote: Two complex damps and a proto cloak:on should enable all Scouts to beat all passive scans and all active scans excluding GA Logi + Focused. Focused Scanner cool down and sca...
- by DeathwindRising - at 2014.12.01 17:18:00
|
857. Sticky:[Feedback] EWAR Concentric Circle Scan Falloff Design - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
CCP Rattati wrote: Amps decrease Precision Precision reduces range Both increase Profile dafaq? penalty is by how much? because amps and precision are pretty useless without each other. this seems counter productive. there goes everyone...
- by DeathwindRising - at 2014.12.01 17:12:00
|
858. Sticky:[Feedback] EWAR Concentric Circle Scan Falloff Design - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Jebus McKing wrote: The sheer horror of the thought that my 3x dampened Assault will still be picked up over 30m+ by a Logi with only 2x precision makes me want to puke. i run a logi with 3 complex precision and 2 complex range amps... good...
- by DeathwindRising - at 2014.12.01 14:14:00
|
859. Sticky:[Feedback] EWAR Concentric Circle Scan Falloff Design - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
DeathwindRising wrote: one thing id like to see on the topic of passive scan is to make them work no matter what. to do this we would make it so that anyone that comes within scan range immediate starts being "scanned". but this would take tim...
- by DeathwindRising - at 2014.12.01 12:04:00
|
860. Sticky:[Feedback] EWAR Concentric Circle Scan Falloff Design - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
CCP Rattati wrote: Cat Merc wrote: CCP Rattati wrote: To allow counterplay - precision modules give an equal penalty to profile This is where I have issue with the whole thing. Scanning is still a far more powerful thing than dampenin...
- by DeathwindRising - at 2014.12.01 09:55:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |