| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 |
1641. Organize Fittings - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
CCP Rattati wrote: TIGER SHARK1501 wrote: I'm pretty sure I've heard others mention it but it would be sweet if we could organize our fittings by type such as assault, heavy, logi, scout. Currently the only way to do this is by renaming our ...
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.02.12 12:44:00
|
1642. HAV bring back initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
DUST Fiend wrote: I hear you loud and clear man, and I agree. Simply offering up a word of caution to keep my beloved babies from fading into obscurity. Na. Believe it or not I keep all of them in mind, including the impact of pointing AV we...
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.02.12 12:42:00
|
1643. HAV bring back initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
DUST Fiend wrote: As an AV Incubus pilot I always forget about standard dropships since any and all fits melts well before they can retreat or retaliate. Honestly, if a standard ship is being useful -at all- then its taking two players, so you ...
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.02.12 11:15:00
|
1644. Make the MD the solution to sentinels - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Since Rattati is looking at adding heavy weapon AV to the game and vehicles no longer do significant splash sentinels can afford to lose splash resistance. And to the argunent that armor sents will be nerfed too much: Galsents and amsents can b...
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.02.12 11:02:00
|
1645. Make the MD the solution to sentinels - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
KA24DERT wrote: Breakin Stuff wrote: Piercing Serenity wrote: KA24DERT is going to have fun with this (He was battled down in a thread arguing this point a few weeks ago, then people changed their minds) He's not particularly good at a...
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.02.12 10:48:00
|
1646. HAV bring back initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
DUST Fiend wrote: Breakin Stuff wrote: DUST Fiend wrote: Hard to estimate when we have no idea where dropships will be. Buff AV but leave DS survivability as is and you will place the final nail in our flying coffins Only if swarms got...
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.02.12 10:40:00
|
1647. HAV bring back initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
DUST Fiend wrote: Hard to estimate when we have no idea where dropships will be. Buff AV but leave DS survivability as is and you will place the final nail in our flying coffins Only if swarms got buffed. And LOL hell no.
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.02.12 09:33:00
|
1648. HAV bring back initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Is the final proposal going to deviate wildly from the current spreadsheet and extrapolated EHP? if it will be similar I can start breaking down the Infantry AV for tentative looks at TTK. My intent is to keep my infantry AV DPS numbers at least...
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.02.12 08:56:00
|
1649. secondary payment system - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
voidfaction wrote: CCP Rattati wrote: Slave of MORTE wrote: Please make a second payout for all matches in dust rewarded to the winners only In the form of components That's all Thank you Agreed, I have already asked the team to d...
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.02.12 08:34:00
|
1650. [IDEA]Simple Trading - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Sequal's Back wrote: -Dont call this Trading, it's not rven a simple one. A trade is an exchange between 2 people, there is no exchange in the feature you're adding in.. -Please, don't use the contact list.. It takes years to open it. Yeah ...
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.02.12 08:27:00
|
1651. [IDEA]Simple Trading - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
I'm patient enough. Besides, I only run one type of scam. Trade scams aren't it.
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.02.12 07:09:00
|
1652. Suggestion: Give apex logistics advanced variants of their primary e... - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
MINA Longstrike wrote: Breakin Stuff wrote: If we give APEX any advanced fittings I believe that they should be placed on the LP suits. Make the Aurum suits stuck with basic. Give aur suit bearers the option to upgrade their suits to the AD...
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.02.12 06:51:00
|
1653. Sticky:[Feedback] Planetary Conquest Revisited - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
el OPERATOR wrote: Breakin Stuff wrote: 6v12 offers no tactical advantage to the raiding party and every advantage to the defenders. Correct. It is weighted towards the defenders, partially to address what Travis accurately descibed as...
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.02.12 06:45:00
|
1654. [IDEA]Simple Trading - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Jadek Menaheim wrote: dy5t0pia wrote: Gyn Wallace wrote: With respect to # 1 and 2, people selling me gear have to send the gear to me before I pay them. People buying gear from me have to pay me first. Full payment, not half before/hal...
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.02.12 06:41:00
|
1655. secondary payment system - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
CCP Rattati wrote: Slave of MORTE wrote: Please make a second payout for all matches in dust rewarded to the winners only In the form of components That's all Thank you Agreed, I have already asked the team to develop a "if won" paym...
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.02.12 06:31:00
|
1656. Suggestion: Give apex logistics advanced variants of their primary e... - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
If we give APEX any advanced fittings I believe that they should be placed on the LP suits. Make the Aurum suits stuck with basic. Give aur suit bearers the option to upgrade their suits to the ADV fittings at faction level 7-8
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.02.12 06:26:00
|
1657. Question about battle duration - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Pokey Dravon wrote: True Adamance wrote: Pokey Dravon wrote: Well for one, 32v32 simply wont happen, system can't handle it. Secondly, are there win conditions? FW doesn't have win conditions so its not like much would change. I m...
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.02.12 05:22:00
|
1658. Question about battle duration - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Pokey Dravon wrote: Well for one, 32v32 simply wont happen, system can't handle it. Secondly, are there win conditions? Direct contribution to planetary SOV by holding hack points. Which in turn adds or degrades system SOV. Tie earned ISK/L...
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.02.11 23:56:00
|
1659. Question about battle duration - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
el OPERATOR wrote: DO THIS, CCP!! and maybe make it more than 16v16 ( 32v 32 would be a good start) I was thinking for faction warfare, actually, to represent constant warfare. Godin's other thread has merit. But tie LP/ISk rewards to ti...
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.02.11 23:46:00
|
1660. Question about battle duration - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Can a battle be opened and run 23/7 just rotating people into districts as people leave rather than the whole 150 clone match or whatever?
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.02.11 23:39:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |