| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 [100] 200 |
1981. AV feedback - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Thundergroove: The 0.5 second delay between shot fired and reload on the PLC. And if there is an iidentical trait on any other weapon.
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.01.25 11:25:00
|
1982. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Hull Progression - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Rattati would you like me to do number builds for the scrambler lance, plasma mortar, autocannon and arc cannon adapted to 1.10 AV DPS standards that I had in my chrome build spreadsheet? It's an easy conversion.
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.01.25 11:22:00
|
1983. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Hull Progression - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
I find the AV things we have now very adequate. We need full racial flavor But honestly the mass driver and flaylock being full power against vehicles won't break them. The laser rifle, however... The heat mechanic will cause problems because o...
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.01.25 06:59:00
|
1984. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Hull Progression - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
I honestly prefer heavy weapons as AV/AI dual purpose to begin with. Forge guns aren't exactly poor against infantry except in close work
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.01.25 05:49:00
|
1985. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Hull Progression - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
CCP Rattati wrote: Cool, and appreciated. I have been thinking with the possible escalation of HAV strength, that MD and LR could be more useful against vehicles, and possibly IP and Flaylock as well. While a cool concept, the mass driver ...
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.01.25 03:45:00
|
1986. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Hull Progression - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Hey Rattati full breakdowns of the AV capacity of the weapons is more or less done. I only have the nova knives and flaylock but after looking at the mass driver I'm going to go out on a limb and call bot weapons' AV capacity minimal. Good for a ...
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.01.25 02:47:00
|
1987. AV feedback - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
If you can find tge unlisted shot delay on the PLC I'd appreciate it. And please see if it's duplicated on any other weapon.
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.01.25 02:43:00
|
1988. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Hull Progression - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Spkr4theDead wrote: Same old words *Yawn* Call me when you come up with something besides the same old accusative posts Sparky, you're like a broken record. It's not even annoying anymore, just boring.
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.01.24 22:12:00
|
1989. AV feedback - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Meh. F&F is a righteous pain in the rear
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.01.24 22:10:00
|
1990. AV feedback - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Given the numbers I have seen from the mass driver I'm expecting the actual AV numbers for NK and flaylocks to be hilariously bad
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.01.24 21:25:00
|
1991. AV feedback - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
assault swarms are functionally identical to standard. the only difference is the ability to lock two targets, which is functionally as useful as a football bat. AV spreadsheet has been updated, check the link in my sig, again as a reminder this...
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.01.24 20:51:00
|
1992. AV feedback - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Shamarskii Simon wrote: I'm getting on dust now, if you guys would like to squad up/sync against each other for in game data? I'm on. go ahead and invite me
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.01.24 20:46:00
|
1993. AV feedback - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Nothing Certain wrote: Although it is out of the scope of your post, HAV/AV "balance" can't be achieved without changing the expectations of vehicle users. If they pay 500K for a vehicle and can only make 150K a match they understandably think ...
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.01.24 20:39:00
|
1994. AV feedback - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
MINA Longstrike wrote: Breakin Stuff wrote: I think swarms update the target's last location based on a timer. So every... we'll say half second it updates the target location. So it bombs along on the last valid trajectory and THEN updates ...
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.01.24 19:57:00
|
1995. AV feedback - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
I think swarms update the target's last location based on a timer. So every... we'll say half second it updates the target location. So it bombs along on the last valid trajectory and THEN updates 30m later.so your dropship bolts around a corner w...
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.01.24 19:24:00
|
1996. AV feedback - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Shamarskii Simon wrote: But if swarms have full range, wouldn't that means swarms can control a great distance, rendering an entire 400m sphere vehicle-less? Or am i understanding you wrong breakin? slower rate of fire means pilots still ha...
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.01.24 19:15:00
|
1997. A HAV question - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Pokey Dravon wrote: Because it's better to have them without new art assets than not have them at all. Besides later down the line if we ever do get the art assets, then the HAVs themselves are already implemented and balanced, and simply drop...
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.01.24 18:54:00
|
1998. AV feedback - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Stefan Stahl wrote: Let's assume we gave the SL an increased lock-on-time (~2.5 secs) while increasing lock-on range (~250 m) and adjusting for DPS. Would it then not infringe on the purpose of the FG? Other than that I do think the PLC should...
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.01.24 18:32:00
|
1999. AV feedback - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Basically IMHO turrets orverall are a clusterf*ck. There's no guiding principle, just a lot of non-consistency. Infantry Av is better laid out and even then from a balance perspective you might as well be using a shotgun to hit a bullseye at 50m....
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.01.24 18:09:00
|
2000. A HAV question - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Copharus Arkana wrote: I see that the plan is to recycle the two models we have. Is there an easy explanation for why? And would we ever hope to see minmatar and amarr HAVs with their own models? http://i.imgur.com/xSxlftZ.png We will ...
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.01.24 17:45:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 [100] 200 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |