Pages: 1 2 [3] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 4 post(s) |
|
CCP Rattati
C C P C C P Alliance
17117
|
Posted - 2015.02.12 01:55:00 -
[61] - Quote
m621 zma wrote:What will you be doing about the free boosters given during NPE tutorial? If these can be traded, people will just farm alts for these and be constantly triple boosted whilst trading surplus.
I'm up for just a 'give to' dialogue, troll some randoms by dropping a dragonfly off on them. There will be limits on some item trading until we have all exploits covered. Especially starter items. We could even create starter boosters that can't be traded.
"As well as stupid, Rattati is incredibly slow and accident-prone, and cannot even swim"
|
|
dy5t0pia
The dyst0pian Corporation
764
|
Posted - 2015.02.12 02:03:00 -
[62] - Quote
CCP Rattati wrote:m621 zma wrote:What will you be doing about the free boosters given during NPE tutorial? If these can be traded, people will just farm alts for these and be constantly triple boosted whilst trading surplus.
I'm up for just a 'give to' dialogue, troll some randoms by dropping a dragonfly off on them. There will be limits on some item trading until we have all exploits covered. Especially starter items. We could even create starter boosters that can't be traded.
You notice how I haven't replied once to this thread? I made the post to be that I was suggesting an "idea" but really I just wanted some confirmation that I could trade to myself without having to use a middle man or having to use more than one PS3. I just wanted that blue tag, and you did not fail. Thanks.
CEO
Closed Beta Vet
|
Anthany sandifer The2nd
Eternal Beings
23
|
Posted - 2015.02.12 02:14:00 -
[63] - Quote
.........
caldari logistics
|
Gyn Wallace
OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention
228
|
Posted - 2015.02.12 02:37:00 -
[64] - Quote
Balistyc Farshot wrote:Gyn Wallace wrote:... Alternative proposals? Lets put together some rules to help out players who aren't aware of how this works out. 1. Don't send someone you don't trust isk for an item you haven't seen. If you do that then let me tell you about some Saudi Gold I can get for $100 you just need to mail to a PO Box. I would recommend half up front and half upon receipt. 2. Get some of the isk first! This is the first rule of the oldest profession. 3. If you get ripped off, post it on the forums and be aware some people will be making alts to rip people off. We should start a page of known offenders. 4. GYN sounds like a salesman. We should establish that well known Corps backing a player proposing a sale should be a must. That way the bigger corps can boot the players who are alts and stealing. Like requiring a license to sell stock. 5 Don't cry wolf on someone for their reputation unless you know for a fact you got ripped off. 6. CCP - You need to be ready to ban some accounts if people ripping off other people gets out of hand. Or just take their isk and distribute it. 7. CCP - We also need to be able to see all the alts of any one PSN account. Why not make a page like the corp tracking page to give us that information. I may be ignorant to this already existing. Please add as needed.
I wouldn't be willing to operate that way.
With respect to # 1 and 2, people selling me gear have to send the gear to me before I pay them. People buying gear from me have to pay me first. Full payment, not half before/half after delivery.
The reason is simple. If I'm going to stay in business, I can't run around scamming people. If I use any other procedure, some portion of my customers will almost certainly rip me off, which is a cost I'm not willing to bear.
With respect to #3, tracking known scammers doesn't work. As soon as their notoriety becomes an impediment, they create a new scamming account. Just play Eve Online in a major trade hub, and see how long it takes you to learn to ignore the scammers in local chat, instead of making any active effort to counter them, like blocking them or posting their identities somewhere. The other side of that coin is much easier to manage: develop people with good reputations and track records for honoring their financial obligations. Make sure the people who are reputable escrows or trade partners are well known. Its a lot easier than trying to make scammers well known.
With respect to #4, I actually cringed when I read that. I am not a salesman. I'm pretty much the opposite of a salesman.
With respect to #5, 6, and 7, I don't believe CCP is going to lift a finger to stop players from ripping off other players with respect to entirely-in-game items or currency. That's a part of CCP's thing: attracting every budding psychopath out to ruin someone else's day in a game. I'd only expect CCP to enforce a transaction if it could undermine their real world profits, i.e. people trying to scam things that sell for real money outside the game, like game codes. Character sales and exchanges also involve real world money and income for CCP, so they'll enforce/punish in relation to those.
The Dust/Eve Isk Exchange Thread
|
PLAYSTTION
Corrosive Synergy
500
|
Posted - 2015.02.12 02:41:00 -
[65] - Quote
Ive been saying this forever. Now they listen.
Gassault Calogi and more.
- Open Beta Vet - 35mil sp -
- Director of Corrosive Synergy -
|
dy5t0pia
The dyst0pian Corporation
767
|
Posted - 2015.02.12 03:36:00 -
[66] - Quote
Gyn Wallace wrote:
With respect to # 1 and 2, people selling me gear have to send the gear to me before I pay them. People buying gear from me have to pay me first. Full payment, not half before/half after delivery.
So let me get this straight...you want people to fork over their items BEFORE you fork over the cash. But when it comes to you forking over items you want the ISK first!?
I predict no one trading with you in the future...
CEO
Closed Beta Vet
|
Jadek Menaheim
Xer Cloud Consortium
5308
|
Posted - 2015.02.12 06:17:00 -
[67] - Quote
dy5t0pia wrote:Gyn Wallace wrote:
With respect to # 1 and 2, people selling me gear have to send the gear to me before I pay them. People buying gear from me have to pay me first. Full payment, not half before/half after delivery.
So let me get this straight...you want people to fork over their items BEFORE you fork over the cash. But when it comes to you forking over items you want the ISK first!? I predict no one trading with you in the future... That's the Chribba way. When you've established a genuine reputation as a legitimate broker you can set the terms.
Neckbeard for Good charity shave
|
Breakin Stuff
Goonfeet Special Planetary Emergency Response Group
7122
|
Posted - 2015.02.12 06:41:00 -
[68] - Quote
Jadek Menaheim wrote:dy5t0pia wrote:Gyn Wallace wrote:
With respect to # 1 and 2, people selling me gear have to send the gear to me before I pay them. People buying gear from me have to pay me first. Full payment, not half before/half after delivery.
So let me get this straight...you want people to fork over their items BEFORE you fork over the cash. But when it comes to you forking over items you want the ISK first!? I predict no one trading with you in the future... That's the Chribba way. When you've established a genuine reputation as a legitimate broker you can set the terms. When you operate with a middleman, you transfer the ISK, the items in question and his fee to him. Then he makes delivery to both parties.
Chribba has a rep in EVE because he follows through. As a result he is among the richest players in EVE.
It's very simple. If you're a scammer you become known.
If you never bone people on a broker job ever you can more or less name your price.
Trade outside the marketplace is reputation-critical.
AV
|
Kain Spero
Negative-Feedback.
4593
|
Posted - 2015.02.12 06:49:00 -
[69] - Quote
CCP Rattati wrote:m621 zma wrote:What will you be doing about the free boosters given during NPE tutorial? If these can be traded, people will just farm alts for these and be constantly triple boosted whilst trading surplus.
I'm up for just a 'give to' dialogue, troll some randoms by dropping a dragonfly off on them. There will be limits on some item trading until we have all exploits covered. Especially starter items. We could even create starter boosters that can't be traded.
I would def prefer soul-locked starter boosters than preventing all boosters from being trading. I really think that boosters could end up as the PLEX of Dust.
Owner of Spero Escrow Services
Follow @KainSpero for Dust and Legion news
|
|
ChribbaX
Otherworld Enterprises Dust Control Otherworld Empire Productions
1532
|
Posted - 2015.02.12 07:06:00 -
[70] - Quote
Breakin Stuff wrote:Jadek Menaheim wrote:dy5t0pia wrote:Gyn Wallace wrote:
With respect to # 1 and 2, people selling me gear have to send the gear to me before I pay them. People buying gear from me have to pay me first. Full payment, not half before/half after delivery.
So let me get this straight...you want people to fork over their items BEFORE you fork over the cash. But when it comes to you forking over items you want the ISK first!? I predict no one trading with you in the future... That's the Chribba way. When you've established a genuine reputation as a legitimate broker you can set the terms. When you operate with a middleman, you transfer the ISK, the items in question and his fee to him. Then he makes delivery to both parties. Chribba has a rep in EVE because he follows through. As a result he is among the richest players in EVE. It's very simple. If you're a scammer you become known. If you never bone people on a broker job ever you can more or less name your price. Trade outside the marketplace is reputation-critical. Adding to that, of course the absolute hardest part is to actually build that trust. Something most pilots and mercs (I would assume) are not patient enough to do. Just knowing it took me years to build the trust I have today.
For me personally I hope the trading will be designed in such a way that I can offer my services here as well
/c
DUSTBoard
DUST Server Status
|
|
|
Breakin Stuff
Goonfeet Special Planetary Emergency Response Group
7123
|
Posted - 2015.02.12 07:09:00 -
[71] - Quote
I'm patient enough.
Besides, I only run one type of scam.
Trade scams aren't it.
AV
|
Sequal's Back
Dead Man's Game RUST415
272
|
Posted - 2015.02.12 07:18:00 -
[72] - Quote
-Dont call this Trading, it's not rven a simple one. A trade is an exchange between 2 people, there is no exchange in the feature you're adding in..
-Please, don't use the contact list.. It takes years to open it.
Rise? That's what they used to call me. Sequal Rise. That was my name.
Now I come Back to you, at the turn of the tide.
|
Breakin Stuff
Goonfeet Special Planetary Emergency Response Group
7123
|
Posted - 2015.02.12 08:27:00 -
[73] - Quote
Sequal's Back wrote:-Dont call this Trading, it's not rven a simple one. A trade is an exchange between 2 people, there is no exchange in the feature you're adding in..
-Please, don't use the contact list.. It takes years to open it. Yeah the contact list is a giant failbucket.
AV
|
The-Errorist
1042
|
Posted - 2015.02.12 10:29:00 -
[74] - Quote
Gyn Wallace wrote:Balistyc Farshot wrote:Gyn Wallace wrote:... Alternative proposals? Lets put together some rules to help out players who aren't aware of how this works out. 1. Don't send someone you don't trust isk for an item you haven't seen. If you do that then let me tell you about some Saudi Gold I can get for $100 you just need to mail to a PO Box. I would recommend half up front and half upon receipt. 2. Get some of the isk first! This is the first rule of the oldest profession. 3. If you get ripped off, post it on the forums and be aware some people will be making alts to rip people off. We should start a page of known offenders. 4. GYN sounds like a salesman. We should establish that well known Corps backing a player proposing a sale should be a must. That way the bigger corps can boot the players who are alts and stealing. Like requiring a license to sell stock. 5 Don't cry wolf on someone for their reputation unless you know for a fact you got ripped off. 6. CCP - You need to be ready to ban some accounts if people ripping off other people gets out of hand. Or just take their isk and distribute it. 7. CCP - We also need to be able to see all the alts of any one PSN account. Why not make a page like the corp tracking page to give us that information. I may be ignorant to this already existing. Please add as needed. I wouldn't be willing to operate that way. With respect to # 1 and 2, people selling me gear have to send the gear to me before I pay them. People buying gear from me have to pay me first. Full payment, not half before/half after delivery. The reason is simple. If I'm going to stay in business, I can't run around scamming people. If I use any other procedure, some portion of my customers will almost certainly rip me off, which is a cost I'm not willing to bear. With respect to #3, tracking known scammers doesn't work. As soon as their notoriety becomes an impediment, they create a new scamming account. Just play Eve Online in a major trade hub, and see how long it takes you to learn to ignore the scammers in local chat, instead of making any active effort to counter them, like blocking them or posting their identities somewhere. The other side of that coin is much easier to manage: develop people with good reputations and track records for honoring their financial obligations. Make sure the people who are reputable escrows or trade partners are well known. Its a lot easier than trying to make scammers well known. With respect to #4, I actually cringed when I read that. I am not a salesman. I'm pretty much the opposite of a salesman. With respect to #5, 6, and 7, I don't believe CCP is going to lift a finger to stop players from ripping off other players with respect to entirely-in-game items or currency. That's a part of CCP's thing: attracting every budding psychopath out to ruin someone else's day in a game. I'd only expect CCP to enforce a transaction if it could undermine their real world profits, i.e. people trying to scam things that sell for real money outside the game, like game codes. Character sales and exchanges also involve real world money and income for CCP, so they'll enforce/punish in relation to those. You had me on "I am not a salesman"; take all of my money.
Suits, Tanks, a mode
|
Gyn Wallace
OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention
229
|
Posted - 2015.02.12 13:59:00 -
[75] - Quote
dy5t0pia wrote:Gyn Wallace wrote:
With respect to # 1 and 2, people selling me gear have to send the gear to me before I pay them. People buying gear from me have to pay me first. Full payment, not half before/half after delivery.
So let me get this straight...you want people to fork over their items BEFORE you fork over the cash. But when it comes to you forking over items you want the ISK first!? I predict no one trading with you in the future...
Those are precisely the terms on which I've operated the currency exchange between Eve and Dust for more than a year. If you follow that link in my signature line, you can read the entire discussion that led to that procedure, including the circumstances where I considered making an exception.
Just like the currency exchange though, I don't think there are going to be enough people acting as reliable middlemen to be more interested in competing with each other rather than working more like a cooperative. I don't mean that as much in the sense of price collusion as infrequent cooperation, to cover each other's shortages while making price adjustments to avoid shortages. If there aren't enough middlemen, we can't have a robust market. What are the chances of getting better market tools if "simple trading" dies on the table for lack of use?
The Dust/Eve Isk Exchange Thread
|
Gyn Wallace
OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention
229
|
Posted - 2015.02.12 14:04:00 -
[76] - Quote
CCP Rattati wrote:Simple Trading as I define it is go to item in assets press X send item to Contact (not player) select qty send are you sure yes
I can't believe I didn't think to ask this sooner: Can the consequences of the above procedure be delivery of the selected quantity of items AND an EVE mail from the sender to the receiver saying something similarly simple " _(quantity)_ of _(item)_ sent."
If I have to track changes in my assets to know what people have sent me, that's going to be a colossal pain in the rear for anyone trying to function as a middleman.
The Dust/Eve Isk Exchange Thread
|
Balistyc Farshot
The Exemplars RISE of LEGION
62
|
Posted - 2015.02.12 16:54:00 -
[77] - Quote
Gyn Wallace wrote:Balistyc Farshot wrote:Gyn Wallace wrote:... Alternative proposals? Lets put together some rules to help out players who aren't aware of how this works out. 1. Don't send someone you don't trust isk for an item you haven't seen. If you do that then let me tell you about some Saudi Gold I can get for $100 you just need to mail to a PO Box. I would recommend half up front and half upon receipt. 2. Get some of the isk first! This is the first rule of the oldest profession. 3. If you get ripped off, post it on the forums and be aware some people will be making alts to rip people off. We should start a page of known offenders. 4. GYN sounds like a salesman. We should establish that well known Corps backing a player proposing a sale should be a must. That way the bigger corps can boot the players who are alts and stealing. Like requiring a license to sell stock. 5 Don't cry wolf on someone for their reputation unless you know for a fact you got ripped off. 6. CCP - You need to be ready to ban some accounts if people ripping off other people gets out of hand. Or just take their isk and distribute it. 7. CCP - We also need to be able to see all the alts of any one PSN account. Why not make a page like the corp tracking page to give us that information. I may be ignorant to this already existing. Please add as needed. I wouldn't be willing to operate that way. With respect to # 1 and 2, people selling me gear have to send the gear to me before I pay them. People buying gear from me have to pay me first. Full payment, not half before/half after delivery. The reason is simple. If I'm going to stay in business, I can't run around scamming people. If I use any other procedure, some portion of my customers will almost certainly rip me off, which is a cost I'm not willing to bear. With respect to #3, tracking known scammers doesn't work. As soon as their notoriety becomes an impediment, they create a new scamming account. Just play Eve Online in a major trade hub, and see how long it takes you to learn to ignore the scammers in local chat, instead of making any active effort to counter them, like blocking them or posting their identities somewhere. The other side of that coin is much easier to manage: develop people with good reputations and track records for honoring their financial obligations. Make sure the people who are reputable escrows or trade partners are well known. Its a lot easier than trying to make scammers well known. With respect to #4, I actually cringed when I read that. I am not a salesman. I'm pretty much the opposite of a salesman. With respect to #5, 6, and 7, I don't believe CCP is going to lift a finger to stop players from ripping off other players with respect to entirely-in-game items or currency. That's a part of CCP's thing: attracting every budding psychopath out to ruin someone else's day in a game. I'd only expect CCP to enforce a transaction if it could undermine their real world profits, i.e. people trying to scam things that sell for real money outside the game, like game codes. Character sales and exchanges also involve real world money and income for CCP, so they'll enforce/punish in relation to those.
Guess I am becoming the trade regulator. So EVE has a system where I can track you down and make your life hell after you scam me. Dust is much harder to establish that punishment because I can't follow you after you steal from me.
I have to agree with others that the middle man piece would work for you to get your money, if we trusted you. But you poo poo the idea of us making a list of scammers on the forums. Also you poo poo the corps being required to back you. Just wow dude. You are standing here as the stock broker and saying, we don't really need an FCC or better business bureau. Trust me, I will take your money and items where they need to go. If you plan on making money, expect to put money into the game. If you don't anti up you can't play. I would like to see a district holding corp back the middle man. If we think you are scamming, we roll your district. You have skin in the game just like us. We just take our payment in clone packs. BTW - This is me explaining as a community that trust is going to be hard to establish day 1 if you guys don't put yourselves out there.
Heavy with a massive bullet hose called Lola (Burst HMG).
|
Foo Fighting
Sinq Laison Gendarmes Gallente Federation
180
|
Posted - 2015.02.12 18:02:00 -
[78] - Quote
If trading involves opening contacts and opening assets (the two slowest pages you can open on your neocom) I can see many people not bothering with low value trades and this will be a shame for new bros. I've got plenty of stuff lying around that I would willingly donate to new players but not if it takes 30+ seconds to send a single consignment to someone. Trades will be limited to officer gear, BPOs and collectibles if the time to make a trade is too long. |
raven glow
Company of Marcher Lords Amarr Empire
2
|
Posted - 2015.02.12 18:44:00 -
[79] - Quote
this would be amazing. i have so many bpo's on different accounts. would be nice to move them all to one account :D also would allow a new side to being a gun merchant etc
HA YES JUST YES
me and you, hint hint :D
CLICK ME
|
Gyn Wallace
OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention
231
|
Posted - 2015.02.12 23:29:00 -
[80] - Quote
Balistyc Farshot wrote:Gyn Wallace wrote:Balistyc Farshot wrote:... I would recommend half up front and half upon receipt. ... ...The reason is simple. If I'm going to stay in business, I can't run around scamming people. If I use any other procedure, some portion of my customers will almost certainly rip me off, which is a cost I'm not willing to bear. .... I note that you didn't defend that recommendation. Are you withdrawing it? Do you need additional discussion to understand it as an invitation for scammers to put middlemen out of business?
Balistyc Farshot wrote: So EVE has a system where I can track you down and make your life hell after you scam me. It really doesn't. Every time I visit Jita, Dodixie, Rens, there's a whole new crop of scammers. Do you have any experience with successfully making even a single scammer's life hell? Its a nice idea, but my impression is that scammers use disposable characters. It seems unlikely that you or anyone is going to punish them. However, by all means, make your scammer lists. If you keep even a single newbie from getting scammed, I'll praise your effort as having been totally worth whatever time you spent on it. On the other hand, if you find your efforts seem to be wasted, try to remember that I warned you, and advised you where your efforts could be better spent.
Can we agree that its easier to keep track of a small number of trusted escrows than a large perpetually changing pool of scammers? That's the main point I wanted to make in response to your proposal.
Balistyc Farshot wrote:You are standing here as the stock broker and saying, we don't really need an FCC or better business bureau. Trust me, I will take your money and items where they need to go. If you plan on making money, expect to put money into the game. If you don't anti up you can't play. I would like to see a district holding corp back the middle man. If we think you are scamming, we roll your district. You have skin in the game just like us. We just take our payment in clone packs. BTW - This is me explaining as a community that trust is going to be hard to establish day 1 if you guys don't put yourselves out there. I find it odd that instead of addressing ideas directly, you feel the need to characterize me as a "salesman" or "stock broker" or mischaracterize what I've written. I don't feel the need to insult you in the process of disagreeing with you.
Can you cite an example of an in game corporation (many individuals, as opposed to a single individual with several alts) functioning as a trusted escrow? A "trusted" corporation seems like an opportunity to diffuse responsibility, rather than increasing reliability.
I don't suppose you actually followed the link in my sig, so I'll make it easier. This is the page reviewing the first year of my currency exchange's operation. I'm happy to discuss why I've chosen to operate this way, if you have any questions that aren't addressed in that thread. If you'd like to continue addressing the ideas you've raised (partial payments, scammer lists, corporate backing, and CCP enforcement) I'm happy to do that too.
The Dust/Eve Isk Exchange Thread
|
|
PR0T0TYPE-PH0ENIX PR0JECT-MK-1
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
2
|
Posted - 2015.02.13 05:35:00 -
[81] - Quote
please rattai do not implement trading unless you make it so that i can do a direct trade with someone as in isk/aur for items or items for items as well as a double confirmation check box meaning both parties need to accept the trade b4 it happens as well as a window that we can both see the items and isk/aur in the trade thankyou |
Lavallois Nash
Federal Transfers and Trades
489
|
Posted - 2015.02.13 05:51:00 -
[82] - Quote
Gyn Wallace wrote:I can't believe I didn't think to ask this sooner: Can the consequences of the above procedure be delivery of the selected quantity of items AND an automated EVE-mail from the sender to the receiver saying something similarly simple " _(quantity)_ of _(item)_ sent."
If I have to track changes in my assets to know what people have sent me, that's going to be a colossal pain in the rear for anyone trying to function as a middleman.
This is actually one of my biggest headaches in ironing out how im going to move into being a merchant. I have a KB/M, so i can send out customized receipts with ease. But people sending to me, if they have a controller, is going to be hassle to make me a minimum listed receipt with the items and quantities sent.
An auto generate like that would be a major lifesaver. +1 +1 !! lol. |
Alena Ventrallis
Intara Direct Action Caldari State
2546
|
Posted - 2015.02.13 14:03:00 -
[83] - Quote
CCP Rattati wrote:Simple Trading as I define it is
go to item in assets press X send item to Contact (not player) select qty send are you sure yes
Eve contracts would prevent scamming far easier. I can easily take advantage of this system.
Listen to my muscle memory
Contemplate what I've been clinging to
Forty-six and two ahead of me
|
Gyn Wallace
OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention
233
|
Posted - 2015.02.13 14:08:00 -
[84] - Quote
Lavallois Nash wrote:Gyn Wallace wrote:I can't believe I didn't think to ask this sooner: Can the consequences of the above procedure be delivery of the selected quantity of items AND an automated EVE-mail from the sender to the receiver saying something similarly simple " _(quantity)_ of _(item)_ sent."
If I have to track changes in my assets to know what people have sent me, that's going to be a colossal pain in the rear for anyone trying to function as a middleman. This is actually one of my biggest headaches in ironing out how im going to move into being a merchant. I have a KB/M, so i can send out customized receipts with ease. But people sending to me, if they have a controller, is going to be hassle to make me a minimum listed receipt with the items and quantities sent. An auto generate like that would be a major lifesaver. +1 +1 !! lol.
Without that feature, open advertising and rates won't be possible. If player A and player B both claim to have sent me a stack of x, but there's no way for me to tell which one sent the stack that increased my inventory, I can't have an open advertisement that anyone can accept. Every transfer would require prior eve-mail and delivery before anyone else could send the same item. Otherwise there's no way to tell who to pay.
What if your inventory for x goes up by 100 but both player A and player B claim to have sent you 100 of x? If there's no way to resolve that, the amount of work required to be a middleman will be massive and trade will be slow.
Would the code to automate an evemail (which I get every time someone applies OR WITHDRAWS an application to join my corp...) be at all difficult to implement for trades.. or "simple gifting" if that's more accurate?
The Dust/Eve Isk Exchange Thread
|
Balistyc Farshot
The Exemplars RISE of LEGION
62
|
Posted - 2015.02.13 18:15:00 -
[85] - Quote
Just an FYI - This is going to probably start out between friends and corp mates. I think if it is successful we will find a way to navigate this, lets be humble and happy. Overall this is a great change and we should break the thumbs up for Rattiti on this.
Remember how the last two years we were told this couldn't be done and within 2 months the new CCP has incorporated a sell back feature and now trading which we begged for.
GREAT F***ING JOB NEW CCP! You are spoiling us and we love it. Keep up the good work.
Heavy with a massive bullet hose called Lola (Burst HMG).
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 [3] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |