Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 :: [one page] |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 5 post(s) |
Noc Tempre
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
1283
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 16:05:00 -
[1] - Quote
Since apparently CCP is protecting my privacy by removing responses to my petition, I will gladly share proof over IRC instead.
Continue to discuss here and I will build a quick google site of links to pastebins that respect CCP and SONY privacy.
Again, limited to IRC for direct links. |
Sentient Archon
Red Star.
869
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 16:09:00 -
[2] - Quote
Got your back on this as long as we can balance the future of this game and privacy |
ReGnUM Slayer ofWorlds
Imperfects Public Relations
22
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 16:11:00 -
[3] - Quote
Noc you want to give me the info and I can give it to numerous online information sites. |
|
CCP Eterne
C C P C C P Alliance
1172
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 16:13:00 -
[4] - Quote
We are not in Commercial Release. Any statements of such from a GM was inaccurate. |
|
Maken Tosch
Planetary Response Organisation Test Friends Please Ignore
1798
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 16:13:00 -
[5] - Quote
CCP really needs to step up their game in terms of communicating. I'm not taking about with us but with themselves (as in the GMs and Devs).
But overall, CCP does have a ton of petitions to handle. Consider this:
Eve Online (Tranquility Server - London): 500,000 Subscribers Eve Online (Serenity Server - China): about 100,000 or less subscribers Dust 514 (Tranquility Server): About 400,000 to 500,000 free accounts (assuming every player has created 3 alt characters)
That's well over a million players to handle petitions from. |
KryptixX
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
361
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 16:13:00 -
[6] - Quote
They deleted your first thread? lawl |
Maken Tosch
Planetary Response Organisation Test Friends Please Ignore
1798
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 16:13:00 -
[7] - Quote
CCP Eterne wrote:We are not in Commercial Release. Any statements of such from a GM was inaccurate.
Tagging this thread for future reference. |
ReGnUM Slayer ofWorlds
Imperfects Public Relations
22
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 16:14:00 -
[8] - Quote
CCP Eterne wrote:We are not in Commercial Release. Any statements of such from a GM was inaccurate.
So we will get are AUR back then |
KryptixX
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
361
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 16:15:00 -
[9] - Quote
CCP Eterne wrote:We are not in Commercial Release. Any statements of such from a GM was inaccurate. Meaning we will get AUR refunded on commercial release now? |
Maken Tosch
Planetary Response Organisation Test Friends Please Ignore
1798
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 16:16:00 -
[10] - Quote
ReGnUM Slayer ofWorlds wrote:CCP Eterne wrote:We are not in Commercial Release. Any statements of such from a GM was inaccurate. So we will get are AUR back then
That's gonna be a lot of AUR to refund. I hope this doesn't screw over the New Eden economy when it opens. |
|
Buster Friently
Rosen Association
198
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 16:16:00 -
[11] - Quote
Maken Tosch wrote:CCP really needs to step up their game in terms of communicating. I'm not taking about with us but with themselves (as in the GMs and Devs).
But overall, CCP does have a ton of petitions to handle. Consider this:
Eve Online (Tranquility Server - London): 500,000 Subscribers Eve Online (Serenity Server - China): about 100,000 or less subscribers Dust 514 (Tranquility Server): About 400,000 to 500,000 free accounts (assuming every player has created 3 alt characters)
That's well over a million players to handle petitions from.
Just FYI, according to dustboard, there are almost 2 million mercs created. Even if everyone had 3 characters, we'd be looking at nearly 700,000 dust accounts. |
xxwhitedevilxx M
Maphia Clan Corporation CRONOS.
241
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 16:18:00 -
[12] - Quote
Maken Tosch wrote:ReGnUM Slayer ofWorlds wrote:CCP Eterne wrote:We are not in Commercial Release. Any statements of such from a GM was inaccurate. So we will get are AUR back then That's gonna be a lot of AUR to refund. I hope this doesn't screw over the New Eden economy when it opens. Don't think so. Aur refund should mean that you get a total wipe of SP and assets. And you don't want it to happen, right? |
Judy Maat
Rebelles A Quebec Orion Empire
10
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 16:19:00 -
[13] - Quote
They keep the number hidden until they actually hit the million.. It's a PR tactic.. |
Iskandar Zul Karnain
Hellstorm Inc League of Infamy
275
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 16:20:00 -
[14] - Quote
If I lose all my closed beta BPOs I am going to ******* flip out. |
|
CCP Eterne
C C P C C P Alliance
1173
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 16:20:00 -
[15] - Quote
I'm afraid I can't comment on any plans for an AUR refund at the present moment. I will look into getting a more definitive answer for you guys. |
|
steadyhand amarr
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
376
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 16:22:00 -
[16] - Quote
I think are Sp get refunded if they change that path for example the dropsuit rework |
Cyn Bruin
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
745
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 16:23:00 -
[17] - Quote
CCP Eterne wrote:We are not in Commercial Release. Any statements of such from a GM was inaccurate.
And so you Banned Noc (yes he is banned from forums now) for this?
All you had to do was remove the link, lock the post and give your explaination. Seems a little overkill wouldn't you say CCP ETERNE? |
Maken Tosch
Planetary Response Organisation Test Friends Please Ignore
1798
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 16:30:00 -
[18] - Quote
Buster Friently wrote:Maken Tosch wrote:CCP really needs to step up their game in terms of communicating. I'm not taking about with us but with themselves (as in the GMs and Devs).
But overall, CCP does have a ton of petitions to handle. Consider this:
Eve Online (Tranquility Server - London): 500,000 Subscribers Eve Online (Serenity Server - China): about 100,000 or less subscribers Dust 514 (Tranquility Server): About 400,000 to 500,000 free accounts (assuming every player has created 3 alt characters)
That's well over a million players to handle petitions from. Just FYI, according to dustboard, there are almost 2 million mercs created. Even if everyone had 3 characters, we'd be looking at nearly 700,000 dust accounts.
Damn, already that many? |
Iron Wolf Saber
BetaMax. CRONOS.
3248
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 16:31:00 -
[19] - Quote
GMs before dust 514 where processing what 17,000 petitions a day.
I haven't seen a new blog (but would love too) on how those numbers have changed. |
Flamesea
Shadow Company HQ
4
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 16:31:00 -
[20] - Quote
xxwhitedevilxx M wrote:Maken Tosch wrote:ReGnUM Slayer ofWorlds wrote:CCP Eterne wrote:We are not in Commercial Release. Any statements of such from a GM was inaccurate. So we will get are AUR back then That's gonna be a lot of AUR to refund. I hope this doesn't screw over the New Eden economy when it opens. Don't think so. Aur refund should mean that you get a total wipe of SP and assets. And you don't want it to happen, right?
I bought my merc packs from PSN store (7 of them) 7-8 months ago. If i recall right it said (at that time in merc packs) that AUR is refunded when moving into Commercial Release ( not needing any wipe to that ).
|
|
Tiel Syysch
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
672
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 16:34:00 -
[21] - Quote
xxwhitedevilxx M wrote:Aur refund should mean that you get a total wipe of SP and assets.
Nowhere says that the two must go hand-in-hand. Sure, it's how it's been happening in the past, but they aren't tied to each other. |
Maken Tosch
Planetary Response Organisation Test Friends Please Ignore
1798
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 16:35:00 -
[22] - Quote
Flamesea wrote:xxwhitedevilxx M wrote:Maken Tosch wrote:ReGnUM Slayer ofWorlds wrote:CCP Eterne wrote:We are not in Commercial Release. Any statements of such from a GM was inaccurate. So we will get are AUR back then That's gonna be a lot of AUR to refund. I hope this doesn't screw over the New Eden economy when it opens. Don't think so. Aur refund should mean that you get a total wipe of SP and assets. And you don't want it to happen, right? I bought my merc packs from PSN store (7 of them) 7-8 months ago. If i recall right it said (at that time in merc packs) that AUR is refunded when moving into Commercial Release ( not needing any wipe to that ).
I agree. CCP did say there will be no more SP resets for certain and everyone seems to agree to that. The only thing that left on the table to discuss as a possibility is a possible SP reallocation (reimbursement of SP). Not sure about the assets though. |
Sentient Archon
Red Star.
870
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 16:36:00 -
[23] - Quote
Cyn Bruin wrote:CCP Eterne wrote:We are not in Commercial Release. Any statements of such from a GM was inaccurate. And so you Banned Noc (yes he is banned from forums now) for this? All you had to do was remove the link, lock the post and give your explaination. Seems a little overkill wouldn't you say CCP ETERNE?
CCP doesn't like anything said against them. Happened to me too! It was the best thing ever. If I can get my forum account perma banned it would be the best thing ever. Anyways its prolly a good thing for Noc that he got banned. He can now take a break from this BS forum.
I read everything btw! |
|
CCP Eterne
C C P C C P Alliance
1175
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 16:46:00 -
[24] - Quote
I have removed discussion of moderation from this thread. |
|
tribal wyvern
ZionTCD Legacy Rising
707
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 16:49:00 -
[25] - Quote
Well if a$$holes keep pushing for aur refund and we get it, that means sp wipe too, and reset of assets. Which means everyone (including myself) who purchased all bpo items before the price increase will lose those too. So those of us who created militia fits for cheap to fall back on....will be forced to spend $30 on one militia fit. Carry on trying to F uck things up people, you may just manage it. If the above happens, as much as I love dust, I'm done! |
Commercially Released
Sanmatar Kelkoons Minmatar Republic
0
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 16:50:00 -
[26] - Quote
CCP Eterne wrote:We are not in Commercial Release. Any statements of such from a GM was inaccurate.
Can we assume that this means someone is actually looking into this instead of leaving the question open indefinitely? |
Sky Hale
On The Brink CRONOS.
3
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 16:50:00 -
[27] - Quote
You can't confirm if we are getting our aur items refunded when we go into commercial release even though your product stated it would be ?.
Dude this sounds like CCP are scamming the community.
|
Protoman Is God
Red and Silver Hand Amarr Empire
0
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 16:51:00 -
[28] - Quote
tribal wyvern wrote:Well if a$$holes keep pushing for aur refund and we get it, that means sp wipe too, and reset of assets. Which means everyone (including myself) who purchased all bpo items before the price increase will lose those too. So those of us who created militia fits for cheap to fall back on....will be forced to spend $30 on one militia fit. Carry on trying to F uck things up people, you may just manage it. If the above happens, as much as I love dust, I'm done!
At this point, You really shouldn't be using militia fits unless your gameplay is that mediocre. |
Illuminaughty-696
Omega Risk Control Services
229
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 16:51:00 -
[29] - Quote
tribal wyvern wrote:Well if a$$holes keep pushing for aur refund and we get it, that means sp wipe too, and reset of assets. Which means everyone (including myself) who purchased all bpo items before the price increase will lose those too. So those of us who created militia fits for cheap to fall back on....will be forced to spend $30 on one militia fit. Carry on trying to F uck things up people, you may just manage it. If the above happens, as much as I love dust, I'm done!
Tribal, I could be off here, but my understanding is that there would be no more whipes UNTIL commercial release. We should still see an SP whipe for commercial release. This may have changed, just as CCP seems to be trying to change the AUR situation.
Now, if CCP doesn't whipe our SP I might be able to get over no AUR refunded, but at the same time it was stated that it would be refunded upon commercial release. They may have ninja'd a change without telling anyone, but originally it was definitely to be refunded each SP reset AND commercial release.
Flamesea wrote:I bought my merc packs from PSN store (7 of them) 7-8 months ago. If i recall right it said (at that time in merc packs) that AUR is refunded when moving into Commercial Release ( not needing any wipe to that ).
That's what it said when I bought them. |
General Tiberius1
ZionTCD Legacy Rising
331
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 16:52:00 -
[30] - Quote
Maken Tosch wrote:ReGnUM Slayer ofWorlds wrote:CCP Eterne wrote:We are not in Commercial Release. Any statements of such from a GM was inaccurate. So we will get are AUR back then That's gonna be a lot of AUR to refund. I hope this doesn't screw over the New Eden economy when it opens.
*holds on to his 30 day boosters till he can make billions off of them* |
|
Commercially Released
Sanmatar Kelkoons Minmatar Republic
0
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 16:52:00 -
[31] - Quote
tribal wyvern wrote:Well if a$$holes keep pushing for aur refund and we get it, that means sp wipe too, and reset of assets. Which means everyone (including myself) who purchased all bpo items before the price increase will lose those too. So those of us who created militia fits for cheap to fall back on....will be forced to spend $30 on one militia fit. Carry on trying to F uck things up people, you may just manage it. If the above happens, as much as I love dust, I'm done!
That's a comment on how comical the AUR prices are, not how awesome early adopter discounts were. To be frank, bpos should be removed from the game entirely save the 4 default fits and EXTREMELY RARE prizes. |
BASSMEANT
ZionTCD Legacy Rising
175
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 16:52:00 -
[32] - Quote
they went commercial the minute the first microtransaction took place.
if you are selling it, it's retail.
no wiggle room on that, no matter how your lawyers parse it for ya.
you took money...
it's commercial.
Peace B |
General Tiberius1
ZionTCD Legacy Rising
331
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 16:53:00 -
[33] - Quote
CCP Eterne wrote:I'm afraid I can't comment on any plans for an AUR refund at the present moment. I will look into getting a more definitive answer for you guys.
and where did this thread come from anyway?
seems very random to me. |
|
CCP Eterne
C C P C C P Alliance
1180
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 16:53:00 -
[34] - Quote
Commercially Released wrote:CCP Eterne wrote:We are not in Commercial Release. Any statements of such from a GM was inaccurate. Can we assume that this means someone is actually looking into this instead of leaving the question open indefinitely?
Yes. I sent out an e-mail about it a few minutes ago and will be following up on getting a proper answer in the next few days. But it is Easter and a large number of our team will be on holiday, so it may take some time to get a response. |
|
Commercially Released
Sanmatar Kelkoons Minmatar Republic
0
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 16:54:00 -
[35] - Quote
General Tiberius1 wrote:CCP Eterne wrote:I'm afraid I can't comment on any plans for an AUR refund at the present moment. I will look into getting a more definitive answer for you guys. and where did this thread come from anyway? seems very random to me.
Shh, can't discuss on CCP sites. Best go underground like IRC. |
General Tiberius1
ZionTCD Legacy Rising
331
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 16:54:00 -
[36] - Quote
CCP Eterne wrote:I have removed discussion of moderation from this thread.
without banning?
oooh! that makes me mad |
crazy space 1
ZionTCD Legacy Rising
970
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 16:56:00 -
[37] - Quote
tribal wyvern wrote:Well if a$$holes keep pushing for aur refund and we get it, that means sp wipe too, and reset of assets. Which means everyone (including myself) who purchased all bpo items before the price increase will lose those too. So those of us who created militia fits for cheap to fall back on....will be forced to spend $30 on one militia fit. Carry on trying to F uck things up people, you may just manage it. If the above happens, as much as I love dust, I'm done!
No it does they can wipe just AUR and leave SP as it is, they have done it before.
Also they can only refund AUR spent on items. This would just make people spend more money on dust before release becuase everyone would know it was fun money that would get refunded. Wouldn't you spend a ton more AUR testing weapons and suits if you knew you were going to get it refunded? |
Maken Tosch
Planetary Response Organisation Test Friends Please Ignore
1798
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 16:56:00 -
[38] - Quote
tribal wyvern wrote:Well if a$$holes keep pushing for aur refund and we get it, that means sp wipe too, and reset of assets. Which means everyone (including myself) who purchased all bpo items before the price increase will lose those too. So those of us who created militia fits for cheap to fall back on....will be forced to spend $30 on one militia fit. Carry on trying to F uck things up people, you may just manage it. If the above happens, as much as I love dust, I'm done!
That is pure speculation. There is no confirmation on that happening. SP did confirm that there will be no SP resets. Only a possibility of SP reimbursements is on the table. The only time there is an SP reset happening is when something "catastrophic" happens.
Source:
https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=598443#post598443 |
Tiel Syysch
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
672
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 16:56:00 -
[39] - Quote
CCP Eterne wrote:Commercially Released wrote:CCP Eterne wrote:We are not in Commercial Release. Any statements of such from a GM was inaccurate. Can we assume that this means someone is actually looking into this instead of leaving the question open indefinitely? Yes. I sent out an e-mail about it a few minutes ago and will be following up on getting a proper answer in the next few days. But it is Easter and a large number of our team will be on holiday, so it may take some time to get a response.
I hope you do. I was told marketing was looking into it back in Jan 24, and, well, here we are. |
General Tiberius1
ZionTCD Legacy Rising
331
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 16:59:00 -
[40] - Quote
Tiel Syysch wrote:CCP Eterne wrote:Commercially Released wrote:CCP Eterne wrote:We are not in Commercial Release. Any statements of such from a GM was inaccurate. Can we assume that this means someone is actually looking into this instead of leaving the question open indefinitely? Yes. I sent out an e-mail about it a few minutes ago and will be following up on getting a proper answer in the next few days. But it is Easter and a large number of our team will be on holiday, so it may take some time to get a response. I hope you do. I was told marketing was looking into it back in Jan 24, and, well, here we are.
wow....
i sense a lack of communication between Reykjavik and Shang Hai (or however they're spelled) |
|
BMSTUBBY
KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION
112
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 17:01:00 -
[41] - Quote
CCP Eterne wrote:Commercially Released wrote:CCP Eterne wrote:We are not in Commercial Release. Any statements of such from a GM was inaccurate. Can we assume that this means someone is actually looking into this instead of leaving the question open indefinitely? Yes. I sent out an e-mail about it a few minutes ago and will be following up on getting a proper answer in the next few days. But it is Easter and a large number of our team will be on holiday, so it may take some time to get a response.
Response to your email,
" SoonGäó" |
Illuminaughty-696
Omega Risk Control Services
230
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 17:01:00 -
[42] - Quote
Wow. Outright deleteage of the first thread. Feels a little oppressive. |
Maken Tosch
Planetary Response Organisation Test Friends Please Ignore
1800
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 17:04:00 -
[43] - Quote
CCP, since you are reading this thread, I like to make it known that since we are beginning a new cycle of election for the Eve Online Council of Stellar Management, I will make sure I vote someone in who will be willing to push you into resolving the matter quickly before this gets out of control. This is not to say that I hate CCP. I like you guys. It's just that I don't want CCP to be repeating the mistakes they made back in 2011 which led to the Jita Riots. |
DeeJay One
BetaMax. CRONOS.
10
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 17:07:00 -
[44] - Quote
Isn't the whole idea of that thread in violation of forum rule number 9? |
Cross Atu
Conspiratus Immortalis
855
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 17:07:00 -
[45] - Quote
Commercially Released wrote:tribal wyvern wrote:Well if a$$holes keep pushing for aur refund and we get it, that means sp wipe too, and reset of assets. Which means everyone (including myself) who purchased all bpo items before the price increase will lose those too. So those of us who created militia fits for cheap to fall back on....will be forced to spend $30 on one militia fit. Carry on trying to F uck things up people, you may just manage it. If the above happens, as much as I love dust, I'm done! That's a comment on how comical the AUR prices are, not how awesome early adopter discounts were. To be frank, bpos should be removed from the game entirely save the 4 default fits and EXTREMELY RARE prizes.
That ship has sailed and quite awhile ago, removal now either means A) Creating a new and deeper disadvantage for new players B) Taking away beta rewards, prizes, promotions and purchases from a lot of testers/players who've been supporting the game. (Note: it's not just taking away one of the above, it would require taking away rewards & prizes & promotions & purchases. All of them not used synonymously).
Either one is a very poor choice from a customer relations/PR perspective as it violates stability of the game and customer trust. You cannot conduct a successful micro transaction module if people don't know from one day to the next if their purchases will behave in remotely the same manner as when they were purchased, or even exist at all.
Non-introduction of said BPOs would have been a viable choice, removal is simply a terrible idea across the boards.
~ Cross |
General Tiberius1
ZionTCD Legacy Rising
331
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 17:08:00 -
[46] - Quote
making money will ALLWAYS be the primary focus maken, there's only so much we can do |
General Tiberius1
ZionTCD Legacy Rising
331
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 17:08:00 -
[47] - Quote
DeeJay One wrote:Isn't the whole idea of that thread in violation of forum rule number 9?
it is
i sense a double standard |
Maken Tosch
Planetary Response Organisation Test Friends Please Ignore
1800
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 17:11:00 -
[48] - Quote
General Tiberius1 wrote:DeeJay One wrote:Isn't the whole idea of that thread in violation of forum rule number 9? it is i sense a double standard
Kind of like when you get pulled over by a cop for speeding and cop tells you "Sir, I'm just 5 minutes away from finishing my shift. Give me a reason that I haven't heard already on why I shouldn't give you a ticket and I'll let you go." |
crazy space 1
ZionTCD Legacy Rising
970
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 17:11:00 -
[49] - Quote
General Tiberius1 wrote:making money will ALLWAYS be the primary focus maken, there's only so much we can do They will make more money if people know they will get all their AUR back *excluding boosters of course* |
Commercially Released
Sanmatar Kelkoons Minmatar Republic
0
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 17:12:00 -
[50] - Quote
Cross Atu wrote:Commercially Released wrote:tribal wyvern wrote:Well if a$$holes keep pushing for aur refund and we get it, that means sp wipe too, and reset of assets. Which means everyone (including myself) who purchased all bpo items before the price increase will lose those too. So those of us who created militia fits for cheap to fall back on....will be forced to spend $30 on one militia fit. Carry on trying to F uck things up people, you may just manage it. If the above happens, as much as I love dust, I'm done! That's a comment on how comical the AUR prices are, not how awesome early adopter discounts were. To be frank, bpos should be removed from the game entirely save the 4 default fits and EXTREMELY RARE prizes. That ship has sailed and quite awhile ago, removal now either means A) Creating a new and deeper disadvantage for new players B) Taking away beta rewards, prizes, promotions and purchases from a lot of testers/players who've been supporting the game. (Note: it's not just taking away one of the above, it would require taking away rewards & prizes & promotions & purchases. All of them not used synonymously). Either one is a very poor choice from a customer relations/PR perspective as it violates stability of the game and customer trust. You cannot conduct a successful micro transaction module if people don't know from one day to the next if their purchases will behave in remotely the same manner as when they were purchased, or even exist at all. Non-introduction of said BPOs would have been a viable choice, removal is simply a terrible idea across the boards. ~ Cross
Make the dropsuit rewards paintjobs. Then you can use it on any suit in that class without destroying the risk/reward balance. Same for dragonfly, toxin, and exile. |
|
Maken Tosch
Planetary Response Organisation Test Friends Please Ignore
1800
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 17:14:00 -
[51] - Quote
crazy space 1 wrote:General Tiberius1 wrote:making money will ALLWAYS be the primary focus maken, there's only so much we can do They will make more money if people know they will get all their AUR back *excluding boosters of course*
To be honest, now that I have looked deeply into it, it would probably be best for CCP to just refund the AURUM and leave the assets in place. Assuming CCP does things right, more customers will arrive and it will be best to just get it over with before then or else they'll be in a pickle when people ask for refunds of this nature by the millions. |
Zlocha
Tronhadar Free Guard Minmatar Republic
2
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 17:16:00 -
[52] - Quote
In my opinion there wont be any refunds. Since it got in open beta they said that there will not be any more resets. No SP resets, no AUR resets and no asset resets. And this is the way like it should be i really dont want to start from scratch so i save some AUR spent wrong.
|
Dr Stabwounds
Planetary Response Organisation Test Friends Please Ignore
28
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 17:18:00 -
[53] - Quote
Maken Tosch wrote:crazy space 1 wrote:General Tiberius1 wrote:making money will ALLWAYS be the primary focus maken, there's only so much we can do They will make more money if people know they will get all their AUR back *excluding boosters of course* To be honest, now that I have looked deeply into it, it would probably be best for CCP to just refund the AURUM and leave the assets in place. Assuming CCP does things right, more customers will arrive and it will be best to just get it over with before then or else they'll be in a pickle when people ask for refunds of this nature by the millions.
But there is also a problem with that. - People have used the AUR items to get SP. If there is no wipe then they will have effectively gotten 2x the items/SP they paid for, causing even more disparity between people who have/have not bought AUR. |
BMSTUBBY
KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION
112
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 17:21:00 -
[54] - Quote
Maken Tosch wrote:General Tiberius1 wrote:DeeJay One wrote:Isn't the whole idea of that thread in violation of forum rule number 9? it is i sense a double standard Kind of like when you get pulled over by a cop for speeding and cop tells you "Sir, I'm just 5 minutes away from finishing my shift. Give me a reason that I haven't heard already on why I shouldn't give you a ticket and I'll let you go."
"My wife ran off with a state policeman and when I saw your flashing lights I didn't stop because for a second, I thought you might be the trooper who is trying to bring her back to me." |
Baal Omniscient
L.O.T.I.S. Legacy Rising
396
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 17:28:00 -
[55] - Quote
Tiel Syysch wrote:xxwhitedevilxx M wrote:Aur refund should mean that you get a total wipe of SP and assets. Nowhere says that the two must go hand-in-hand. Sure, it's how it's been happening in the past, but they aren't tied to each other. AUR is used to gain an SP advantage (boosters) and to buy higher tiered items early. If CCP refunded all AUR without resetting SP then basically all of the boosters and items purchased prior to the AUR refund would have been free. I seriously don't see CCP doing that. This may end up being the "catastrophic event" they were alluding to as being the only reason they would reset SP. |
Moonracer2000
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
370
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 17:33:00 -
[56] - Quote
It is definitely a delicate situation for CCP to handle. They did change the terms of merc pack sales around open beta (to remove any mention of reset on release), so if they reset it will probably only be for closed beta sales (still quite a bit).
A total reset would be a nightmare: -people that bought militia BPOs when they were super cheap would be angry. -people that have been grinding SP every day since open beta would be angry. -people that have been stockpiling ISK would be angry. -the reset would occur right as Planetary Conquest begins - the only benefit might be for new players who join in on release to not be up against proto suits
A reset of just merc pack and AUR purchases from before the sales agreement change would also cause problems: -people not included would feel it is unfair -if the reset/refund doesn't effect SP people will be essentially getting free boosters (who used their AUR for that) -if items bought with AUR weren't tracked and removed properly (or already used) it could lead to more complaints.
Either way CCP would lose a lot of potential future sales. Sure the merc packs sold would not cause a loss (they are virtual items, free to restore) but that would also mean fewer merc packs and AUR people would buy again in the near future.
I bought two merc packs before open beta and personally would rather support the game than make demands on a technicality. As long as there is no SP wipe or character reset, I feel I put my AUR and 30 day boosters to use as intended. |
Maken Tosch
Planetary Response Organisation Test Friends Please Ignore
1802
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 18:08:00 -
[57] - Quote
Moonracer2000 wrote:It is definitely a delicate situation for CCP to handle. They did change the terms of merc pack sales around open beta (to remove any mention of reset on release), so if they reset it will probably only be for closed beta sales (still quite a bit).
A total reset would be a nightmare: -people that bought militia BPOs when they were super cheap would be angry. -people that have been grinding SP every day since open beta would be angry. -people that have been stockpiling ISK would be angry. -the reset would occur right as Planetary Conquest begins - the only benefit might be for new players who join in on release to not be up against proto suits
A reset of just merc pack and AUR purchases from before the sales agreement change would also cause problems: -people not included would feel it is unfair -if the reset/refund doesn't effect SP people will be essentially getting free boosters (who used their AUR for that) -if items bought with AUR weren't tracked and removed properly (or already used) it could lead to more complaints.
Either way CCP would lose a lot of potential future sales. Sure the merc packs sold would not cause a loss (they are virtual items, free to restore) but that would also mean fewer merc packs and AUR people would buy again in the near future.
I bought two merc packs before open beta and personally would rather support the game than make demands on a technicality. As long as there is no SP wipe or character reset, I feel I put my AUR and 30 day boosters to use as intended.
So basically what you're saying is that CCP is screwed no matter which route they take. Appease the pro-refund folks and you pee off those who see it as unfair for those who didn't invest any AUR and create a problem with the Dust economy and ultimately nearly kill Dust (which is really, really bad). Appease the anti-refund folks and you end up with a bunch of closed-beta players wanting to file a lawsuit on the company which would result in the loss of revenue needed to sustain Dust.
Wow, there is no solution to this. |
General Tiberius1
ZionTCD Legacy Rising
332
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 18:10:00 -
[58] - Quote
Maken Tosch wrote:Moonracer2000 wrote:It is definitely a delicate situation for CCP to handle. They did change the terms of merc pack sales around open beta (to remove any mention of reset on release), so if they reset it will probably only be for closed beta sales (still quite a bit).
A total reset would be a nightmare: -people that bought militia BPOs when they were super cheap would be angry. -people that have been grinding SP every day since open beta would be angry. -people that have been stockpiling ISK would be angry. -the reset would occur right as Planetary Conquest begins - the only benefit might be for new players who join in on release to not be up against proto suits
A reset of just merc pack and AUR purchases from before the sales agreement change would also cause problems: -people not included would feel it is unfair -if the reset/refund doesn't effect SP people will be essentially getting free boosters (who used their AUR for that) -if items bought with AUR weren't tracked and removed properly (or already used) it could lead to more complaints.
Either way CCP would lose a lot of potential future sales. Sure the merc packs sold would not cause a loss (they are virtual items, free to restore) but that would also mean fewer merc packs and AUR people would buy again in the near future.
I bought two merc packs before open beta and personally would rather support the game than make demands on a technicality. As long as there is no SP wipe or character reset, I feel I put my AUR and 30 day boosters to use as intended. So basically what you're saying is that CCP is screwed no matter which route they take. Appease the pro-refund folks and you pee off those who see it as unfair for those who didn't invest any AUR and create a problem with the Dust economy and ultimately nearly kill Dust (which is really, really bad). Appease the anti-refund folks and you end up with a bunch of closed-beta players wanting to file a lawsuit on the company which would result in the loss of revenue needed to sustain Dust. Wow, there is no solution to this.
yeah, that refund clause in the closed beta merc packs has been screenshotted by several people, i see no easy solution here |
Sete Clifton
PSU GHOST SYNDICATE
74
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 18:19:00 -
[59] - Quote
nevermind |
Tiel Syysch
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
674
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 18:22:00 -
[60] - Quote
Baal Omniscient wrote:Tiel Syysch wrote:xxwhitedevilxx M wrote:Aur refund should mean that you get a total wipe of SP and assets. Nowhere says that the two must go hand-in-hand. Sure, it's how it's been happening in the past, but they aren't tied to each other. AUR is used to gain an SP advantage (boosters) and to buy higher tiered items early. If CCP refunded all AUR without resetting SP then basically all of the boosters and items purchased prior to the AUR refund would have been free. I seriously don't see CCP doing that. This may end up being the "catastrophic event" they were alluding to as being the only reason they would reset SP.
I know the repercussions of refunding AUR without resetting SP, I'm just saying the two aren't required to happen at the same time. People keep bringing up the "but they said no more resets" argument as if it matters. There isn't only one button that both resets SP and refunds AUR, and they can only ever be triggered by that one button and only ever make both of those happen when it's pressed. One can happen without the other, so the SP argument is moot. |
|
martinofski
Rebelles A Quebec Orion Empire
40
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 18:25:00 -
[61] - Quote
I guess from the moment they start selling booster and items in the beta, they started having issues. It get pretty hard to change stuff without involving people's money in the end.
I guess the best would be to reset the AURUM used on the items bought which changed prices only, no reset on AURUM used to buy boosters or any other stuff which never changed in price.
|
General Tiberius1
ZionTCD Legacy Rising
332
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 18:31:00 -
[62] - Quote
ah, now i see where this thread is comming from.
been awhile since i last saw anything about refunds due to closed beta purchases
(that sticky issue of buying arum with the promise of a refund)
what was CCP thinking? |
TheMarkOf22
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
83
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 18:37:00 -
[63] - Quote
The have to refund AUR, EULA states game is in beta, therefore a refund must be granted. |
matsumoto yuichi san
SVER True Blood Unclaimed.
0
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 18:41:00 -
[64] - Quote
why are people interested in a refund, some people got some stuff cheaper , sure, but it's always goign to be like that, someone got it on sale or the price went up or down at some point , as long as the item remains in the game no reason for a refund.... and in this case there have been several plaes CCP said they have no plans for a reset, so thus no reason to remove things from the game, thus no reason for a refund...
perhaps i am not getting something, but everything seems fine...
and no we aren't in commercial release because they reserve the right for that reset, regardless of plans or not, it's still within their rights to perform a reset of stuff because it isn't in release it's beta, but such a reset would entail refund of any aurum involved, but ONLY that would entail such an action
the moment they say they are in commercial release is the moment you can expect to never have a wholesale reset, possible items on a case by case basis are removed for balance and then you may see aurum refunds for those SPECIFIC items only, but even then, its still reasonable. |
Sentient Archon
Red Star.
875
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 18:42:00 -
[65] - Quote
TheMarkOf22 wrote:The have to refund AUR, EULA states game is in beta, therefore a refund must be granted.
I predict a SP reset if the AUR refund happens. CCP is not gonna let you hoard up all those SP and give you an AUR reset. they are gonna compel you to buy passive boosters.
The only thing I will be glad about is that the game will finally be live in May!
Woooooohoooooooooo! |
Sete Clifton
PSU GHOST SYNDICATE
74
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 18:42:00 -
[66] - Quote
TheMarkOf22 wrote:The have to refund AUR, EULA states game is in beta, therefore a refund must be granted.
Yes, the terms appear to bind them legally to refunding the AUR. However, if we push for this, then the community should also be prepared to accept any potential consequences such as an SP and asset reset, both of which are completely possible and fair for CCP to do. I'm not saying that would happen for sure, but it is completely possible. |
Buster Friently
Rosen Association
199
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 18:43:00 -
[67] - Quote
Sentient Archon wrote:TheMarkOf22 wrote:The have to refund AUR, EULA states game is in beta, therefore a refund must be granted. I predict a SP reset if the AUR refund happens. CCP is not gonna let you hoard up all those SP and give you an AUR reset. they are gonna compel you to buy passive boosters. The only thing I will be glad about is that the game will finally be live in May! Woooooohoooooooooo!
The game is already live. Do you mean launched? Or out of beta?
Maybe I've missed something, but I don't think they've said that May 6th/14th is the end of beta, have they?
|
Garrett Blacknova
Codex Troopers
2166
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 18:51:00 -
[68] - Quote
General Tiberius1 wrote:Maken Tosch wrote:Moonracer2000 wrote:It is definitely a delicate situation for CCP to handle. They did change the terms of merc pack sales around open beta (to remove any mention of reset on release), so if they reset it will probably only be for closed beta sales (still quite a bit).
A total reset would be a nightmare: -people that bought militia BPOs when they were super cheap would be angry. -people that have been grinding SP every day since open beta would be angry. -people that have been stockpiling ISK would be angry. -the reset would occur right as Planetary Conquest begins - the only benefit might be for new players who join in on release to not be up against proto suits
A reset of just merc pack and AUR purchases from before the sales agreement change would also cause problems: -people not included would feel it is unfair -if the reset/refund doesn't effect SP people will be essentially getting free boosters (who used their AUR for that) -if items bought with AUR weren't tracked and removed properly (or already used) it could lead to more complaints.
Either way CCP would lose a lot of potential future sales. Sure the merc packs sold would not cause a loss (they are virtual items, free to restore) but that would also mean fewer merc packs and AUR people would buy again in the near future.
I bought two merc packs before open beta and personally would rather support the game than make demands on a technicality. As long as there is no SP wipe or character reset, I feel I put my AUR and 30 day boosters to use as intended. So basically what you're saying is that CCP is screwed no matter which route they take. Appease the pro-refund folks and you pee off those who see it as unfair for those who didn't invest any AUR and create a problem with the Dust economy and ultimately nearly kill Dust (which is really, really bad). Appease the anti-refund folks and you end up with a bunch of closed-beta players wanting to file a lawsuit on the company which would result in the loss of revenue needed to sustain Dust. Wow, there is no solution to this. yeah, that refund clause in the closed beta merc packs has been screenshotted by several people, i see no easy solution here Not an EASY solution, but there is a solution.
Boosters from the Merc Pack DON'T get refunded. Boosters bought with Aurum (whether via Merc Pack or otherwise) DON'T get refunded.
ALL gear is refunded, whether purchased with Aurum or ISK.
SP isn't affected, and the only people with a complaint are the ones who got cheap AUR gear before the price hike, and to be fair, even though I got a lot of extra stuff because of it, I don't have a problem with being reset because the complaint about us getting to keep the gear was more valid than our complaints about losing it would be. ISK farmers won't be affected, because they keep their ISK, and get their money back from whatever they bought with it, even though they don't get to keep the gear itself. |
HowDidThatTaste
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
2325
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 18:51:00 -
[69] - Quote
Sete Clifton wrote:TheMarkOf22 wrote:The have to refund AUR, EULA states game is in beta, therefore a refund must be granted. Yes, the terms appear to bind them legally to refunding the AUR. However, if we push for this, then the community should also be prepared to accept any potential consequences such as an SP and asset reset, both of which are completely possible and fair for CCP to do. I'm not saying that would happen for sure, but it is completely possible.
I think that is a reall slippery slope. I would not look forward to another SP wipe.
The solution would be giving an option to consumers to keep what you have and no SP/AUR reset or reset both SP and Aurum and you start over.
Either way when you log in you have to a check a box that agrees to the new terms and relinguishes there liability.
Every one gets a nice bonus from ccp and the issue goes away.
Not sure there is an answer everyone will like. |
Sentient Archon
Red Star.
875
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 18:58:00 -
[70] - Quote
Buster Friently wrote:
The game is already live. Do you mean launched? Or out of beta?
Maybe I've missed something, but I don't think they've said that May 6th/14th is the end of beta, have they?
Its when no one says "Its a beta" when **** hits the fan! CCP has given it a title "Uprising". Anything with a title is either a new build or an expansion. |
|
TheMarkOf22
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
83
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 18:59:00 -
[71] - Quote
no sp wipe but a refund of aur is the best solution and only good one. |
Sentient Archon
Red Star.
875
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 19:01:00 -
[72] - Quote
HowDidThatTaste wrote:Sete Clifton wrote:TheMarkOf22 wrote:The have to refund AUR, EULA states game is in beta, therefore a refund must be granted. Yes, the terms appear to bind them legally to refunding the AUR. However, if we push for this, then the community should also be prepared to accept any potential consequences such as an SP and asset reset, both of which are completely possible and fair for CCP to do. I'm not saying that would happen for sure, but it is completely possible. I think that is a reall slippery slope. I would not look forward to another SP wipe. The solution would be giving an option to consumers to keep what you have and no SP/AUR reset or reset both SP and Aurum and you start over. Either way when you log in you have to a check a box that agrees to the new terms and relinguishes there liability. Every one gets a nice bonus from ccp and the issue goes away. Not sure there is an answer everyone will like.
Meh! I rather keep the SP. I couldn't give a kitten about AUR. But Que Sera, Sera! If I have to reskill again I will! |
Sentient Archon
Red Star.
875
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 19:02:00 -
[73] - Quote
TheMarkOf22 wrote:no sp wipe but a refund of aur is the best solution and only good one.
Why? If I were CCP I would say kitten you all. If you don't wanna play the game;- don't. You cant get an AUR refund and expect CCP to just stand there and not reset the SP. Its business!
Edit: All the AUR users have come this far because of AUR. Why would CCP let you come so far and then give you back everything without making you start all over again. Its simple business. |
Sete Clifton
PSU GHOST SYNDICATE
75
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 19:02:00 -
[74] - Quote
I would just like to mention that I personally don't care about getting any of my aurum or items back. If it actually comes to it, I don't really care if people get their stuff refunded without giving anything up and it's all essentially free. As long as my character/SP/assets stays as it currently is then my vote goes to doing whatever CCP wants. |
Iron Wolf Saber
BetaMax. CRONOS.
3253
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 19:03:00 -
[75] - Quote
Sentient Archon wrote:Buster Friently wrote:
The game is already live. Do you mean launched? Or out of beta?
Maybe I've missed something, but I don't think they've said that May 6th/14th is the end of beta, have they?
Its when no one says "Its a beta" when **** hits the fan! CCP has given it a title "Uprising". Anything with a title is either a new build or an expansion.
Second Genesis was the name of the first eve online expansion OUT of beta. |
ReGnUM Slayer ofWorlds
Imperfects Public Relations
24
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 19:04:00 -
[76] - Quote
Sete Clifton wrote:TheMarkOf22 wrote:The have to refund AUR, EULA states game is in beta, therefore a refund must be granted. Yes, the terms appear to bind them legally to refunding the AUR. However, if we push for this, then the community should also be prepared to accept any potential consequences such as an SP and asset reset, both of which are completely possible and fair for CCP to do. I'm not saying that would happen for sure, but it is completely possible.
He seems like a tough spot indeed.
If CCP does not give back my AUR then CCP legal word means nothing
If CCP Resets AUR and SP the their word on the forums means nothing.
I don't mind the Arms Race... However, I am sure many people do not want to Re-Grind all over again
Whatever the outcome becomes it will no doubt be exciting |
Sentient Archon
Red Star.
875
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 19:05:00 -
[77] - Quote
Sete Clifton wrote:I would just like to mention that I personally don't care about getting any of my aurum or items back. If it actually comes to it, I don't really care if people get their stuff refunded without giving anything up and it's all essentially free. As long as my character/SP/assets stays as it currently is then my vote goes to doing whatever CCP wants.
Same here dude! I rather keep my SP. |
Sentient Archon
Red Star.
875
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 19:07:00 -
[78] - Quote
ReGnUM Slayer ofWorlds wrote:Whatever the outcome becomes it will no doubt be exciting
And that's why communication is so important!
Not only within CCP but between CCP and the gamers too. Quite honestly it doednt bode two well when 2 different departments within CCP contradict each other.
But after being in corporate America for 15 years I know **** happens. Personally I DGAK (don't give a kitten). I look forward to the fun things that will be coming out in the next few weeks. |
ReGnUM Slayer ofWorlds
Imperfects Public Relations
24
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 19:09:00 -
[79] - Quote
Sete Clifton wrote:I would just like to mention that I personally don't care about getting any of my aurum or items back. If it actually comes to it, I don't really care if people get their stuff refunded without giving anything up and it's all essentially free. As long as my character/SP/assets stays as it currently is then my vote goes to doing whatever CCP wants.
Iam glad you feel that way.
However, this a legal matter and not one of personal opinion. If CCP goes against back on their word. Then I should never follow another rule created by CCP.
Why should I follow them, when the people who created them can't be bothered to follow them.
Especially when this one rule is about money |
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
630
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 19:09:00 -
[80] - Quote
Tiel Syysch wrote:xxwhitedevilxx M wrote:Aur refund should mean that you get a total wipe of SP and assets. Nowhere says that the two must go hand-in-hand. Sure, it's how it's been happening in the past, but they aren't tied to each other. Say I bought 7 merc packs, that comes with a 30 day active booster. So yes, they do need to reset SP, or else they're giving away 7 free boosters and you ended up with 14 monthly boosters even though you only paid for 7. It's refund or reset people.
Of course you could pass it off as a closed beta tester gift, but that's a pretty big kitten gift...
Edit: I wonder if it's possible to just remove any SP that people got from using boosters?
TheMarkOf22 wrote:They have to refund AUR, EULA states game is in beta, therefore a refund must be granted. What do you care? you're gonna get banned again |
|
Sete Clifton
PSU GHOST SYNDICATE
76
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 19:17:00 -
[81] - Quote
ReGnUM Slayer ofWorlds wrote:Sete Clifton wrote:I would just like to mention that I personally don't care about getting any of my aurum or items back. If it actually comes to it, I don't really care if people get their stuff refunded without giving anything up and it's all essentially free. As long as my character/SP/assets stays as it currently is then my vote goes to doing whatever CCP wants. Iam glad you feel that way. However, this a legal matter and not one of personal opinion. If CCP goes against back on their word. Then I should never follow another rule created by CCP. Why should I follow them, when the people who created them can't be bothered to follow them. Especially when this one rule is about money
I get that. I was trying to say that I'm okay with people getting their aurum refunded (as they are legally obligated to) and also keeping their SP/assets. I don't care about them having to give something up in return (SP) as a consequence of the refund and leaving me at any disadvantage. That is, as long as my character remains untouched. |
Iskandar Zul Karnain
Hellstorm Inc League of Infamy
278
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 19:18:00 -
[82] - Quote
HowDidThatTaste wrote: I think that is a reall slippery slope. I would not look forward to another SP wipe.
The solution would be giving an option to consumers to keep what you have and no SP/AUR reset or reset both SP and Aurum and you start over.
Either way when you log in you have to a check a box that agrees to the new terms and relinguishes there liability.
Every one gets a nice bonus from ccp and the issue goes away.
Not sure there is an answer everyone will like.
This is the best solution. I don't give a **** about a reset. I knew January 10th that what I spent would be gone for good. I don't want to lose my SP, ISK, BPOs, officer items etc b/c some people are butthurt. If CCP actually thinks this is necessary I hope they give us an option to opt out. |
Nguruthos IX
Kameira Lodge Amarr Empire
173
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 19:18:00 -
[83] - Quote
Maken Tosch wrote:
I agree. CCP did say there will be no more SP resets for certain and everyone seems to agree to that. The only thing that left on the table to discuss as a possibility is a possible SP reallocation (reimbursement of SP). Not sure about the assets though.
[/quote]
This is definitely what I heard. Or else I wouldn't have wasted a single moment reaching cap in this game every week. |
Mavado V Noriega
SyNergy Gaming
2593
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 19:21:00 -
[84] - Quote
lolthread |
Sete Clifton
PSU GHOST SYNDICATE
76
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 19:30:00 -
[85] - Quote
Nguruthos IX wrote:Maken Tosch wrote:
I agree. CCP did say there will be no more SP resets for certain and everyone seems to agree to that. The only thing that left on the table to discuss as a possibility is a possible SP reallocation (reimbursement of SP). Not sure about the assets though.
This is definitely what I heard. Or else I wouldn't have wasted a single moment reaching cap in this game every week.
I agree, and I think most people agree. However, CCP is on record as saying that even though they didn't/don't plan to do an SP reset, they have reserved the right to in the case of some catastrophic event. I'd consider a bunch of players taking legal action as potentially "catastrophic". I don't want them to reset SP, but I wouldn't be surprised if it did happen because of this. |
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
630
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 19:31:00 -
[86] - Quote
HowDidThatTaste wrote:
The solution would be giving an option to consumers to keep what you have and no SP/AUR reset or reset both SP and Aurum and you start over.
Either way when you log in you have to a check a box that agrees to the new terms and relinguishes there liability.
Every one gets a nice bonus from ccp and the issue goes away.
Not sure there is an answer everyone will like.
That's really is the best way to go, I'd like to see someone resst 6 mill SP just to get 20 bucks back. |
Nguruthos IX
Kameira Lodge Amarr Empire
173
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 19:31:00 -
[87] - Quote
Zlocha wrote:In my opinion there wont be any refunds. Since it got in open beta they said that there will not be any more resets. No SP resets, no AUR resets and no asset resets. And this is the way like it should be i really dont want to start from scratch so i save some AUR spent wrong.
If I'm not keeping my assets, Isk, and SP then I'll be playing this game about 1/10th as much and definitely not paying for another aurum.
I don't have time to level one character twice in a game. Spent way too much time already :( |
Nguruthos IX
Kameira Lodge Amarr Empire
173
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 19:34:00 -
[88] - Quote
Sete Clifton wrote:Nguruthos IX wrote:Maken Tosch wrote:
I agree. CCP did say there will be no more SP resets for certain and everyone seems to agree to that. The only thing that left on the table to discuss as a possibility is a possible SP reallocation (reimbursement of SP). Not sure about the assets though.
This is definitely what I heard. Or else I wouldn't have wasted a single moment reaching cap in this game every week. I agree, and I think most people agree. However, CCP is on record as saying that even though they didn't/don't plan to do an SP reset, they have reserved the right to in the case of some catastrophic event. I'd consider a bunch of players legally demanding their aurum back (which effects SP) as potentially "catastrophic". I don't want them to reset SP (or a refund), but I wouldn't be surprised if it did happen because of this.
They had a statement saying there would not be any resets of any kind, till release, unless something catastrophic happened. ~In which case it would ONLY be a full SP refund, to be reallocated into newly designed skill trees.
Nothing about wiping Aur, assets, ISK, SP , or refunding AUR, or refunding aur (while wiping SP, ISK, assets, etc).
|
Sete Clifton
PSU GHOST SYNDICATE
76
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 19:36:00 -
[89] - Quote
Nguruthos IX wrote:Sete Clifton wrote:Nguruthos IX wrote:Maken Tosch wrote:
I agree. CCP did say there will be no more SP resets for certain and everyone seems to agree to that. The only thing that left on the table to discuss as a possibility is a possible SP reallocation (reimbursement of SP). Not sure about the assets though.
This is definitely what I heard. Or else I wouldn't have wasted a single moment reaching cap in this game every week. I agree, and I think most people agree. However, CCP is on record as saying that even though they didn't/don't plan to do an SP reset, they have reserved the right to in the case of some catastrophic event. I'd consider a bunch of players legally demanding their aurum back (which effects SP) as potentially "catastrophic". I don't want them to reset SP (or a refund), but I wouldn't be surprised if it did happen because of this. They had a statement saying there would not be any resets of any kind, till release, unless something catastrophic happened. ~In which case it would ONLY be a full SP refund, to be reallocated into newly designed skill trees. Nothing about wiping Aur, assets, ISK, SP , or refunding AUR, or refunding aur (while wiping SP, ISK, assets, etc).
Here is the direct quote:
"We currently have no plans to reset your characters' skill points to a state where they are equivalent to a newly created character, barring something catastrophic."
So yes, if something catastrophic happens, they can completely wipe SP.
|
TheMarkOf22
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
83
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 19:38:00 -
[90] - Quote
HowDidThatTaste wrote:Sete Clifton wrote:TheMarkOf22 wrote:The have to refund AUR, EULA states game is in beta, therefore a refund must be granted. Yes, the terms appear to bind them legally to refunding the AUR. However, if we push for this, then the community should also be prepared to accept any potential consequences such as an SP and asset reset, both of which are completely possible and fair for CCP to do. I'm not saying that would happen for sure, but it is completely possible. I think that is a reall slippery slope. I would not look forward to another SP wipe. The solution would be giving an option to consumers to keep what you have and no SP/AUR reset or reset both SP and Aurum and you start over. Either way when you log in you have to a check a box that agrees to the new terms and relinguishes there liability. Every one gets a nice bonus from ccp and the issue goes away. Not sure there is an answer everyone will like.
for everytime i die due to a bug, dont you think im entitled to have my aurum refunded without an sp reset?
your idea is dumb, no offense. |
|
Nguruthos IX
Kameira Lodge Amarr Empire
173
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 19:45:00 -
[91] - Quote
Sete Clifton wrote:
Here is the direct quote:
"We currently have no plans to reset your characters' skill points to a state where they are equivalent to a newly created character, barring something catastrophic."
So yes, if something catastrophic happens, they can completely wipe SP.
Reset =/= wipe. In any other MMO type games you refer to respecing as resetting your skill points. Not 'deleting' them from use ever again. If we have to play the parse every word CCP ever says, then there's no point listening to them at all. Then words clarifying words will come months later and themselves be ambiguous. How can anyone trust that to make appropriate decisions with their time or money? |
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
630
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 19:46:00 -
[92] - Quote
TheMarkOf22 wrote:
for everytime i die due to a bug, dont you think im entitled to have my aurum refunded without an sp reset? .
You're legally entitled to a refund, no one said they have to let you keep any SP that you may or may not have gained from Aur purchases.
And dying to a bug in a beta? You're kidding right? There's guys who've lost proto AUR suits to the black screen, or guys who got disconnected and lost tanks. But you know what they chose to bring that stuff to the field knowing that there are bugs, you don't see them getting AUR or ISK refunds do you?
TL:DR No |
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
630
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 19:50:00 -
[93] - Quote
Nguruthos IX wrote:Sete Clifton wrote:
Here is the direct quote:
"We currently have no plans to reset your characters' skill points to a state where they are equivalent to a newly created character, barring something catastrophic."
So yes, if something catastrophic happens, they can completely wipe SP.
Reset =/= wipe. In any other MMO type games you refer to respecing as resetting your skill points. Not 'deleting' them from use ever again. If we have to play the parse every word CCP ever says, then there's no point listening to them at all. Then words clarifying words will come months later and themselves be ambiguous. How can anyone trust that to make appropriate decisions with their time or money? Ughh we're not talking simple SP reset here, this is a complete character wipe. Assets, SP, Scores, even your name, it all gets deleted, that's how it's been done so far. You'de only get to keep event items and Aur. |
Nguruthos IX
Kameira Lodge Amarr Empire
173
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 19:56:00 -
[94] - Quote
Sloth9230 wrote:Nguruthos IX wrote:Sete Clifton wrote:
Here is the direct quote:
"We currently have no plans to reset your characters' skill points to a state where they are equivalent to a newly created character, barring something catastrophic."
So yes, if something catastrophic happens, they can completely wipe SP.
Reset =/= wipe. In any other MMO type games you refer to respecing as resetting your skill points. Not 'deleting' them from use ever again. If we have to play the parse every word CCP ever says, then there's no point listening to them at all. Then words clarifying words will come months later and themselves be ambiguous. How can anyone trust that to make appropriate decisions with their time or money? Ughh we're not talking simple SP reset here, this is a complete character wipe. Assets, SP, Scores, even your name, it all gets deleted, that's how it's been done so far. You'de only get to keep event items and Aur.
This quote says:
"We currently have no plans to reset your characters' skill points to a state where they are equivalent to a newly created character, barring something catastrophic."
Resetting my character's SP (retains the character), to a state equal to having created a new character (No longer having any SP allocated into any skill), will only happen if there is something catastrophic.
See? Assets are are not part of this, nor BPO, Nor ISK, Nor character name. The only grey area (which would be scummy at best) is what happens to the SP that is taken out of your skills.
The ONLY thing stated here for logical certainty is that they MAY have to remove SP from skills
|
Luke Vetri
D3ath D3alers RISE of LEGION
53
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 19:57:00 -
[95] - Quote
For the love of Kittens lock it already
There is so much mis-information here its stupid
|
Sete Clifton
PSU GHOST SYNDICATE
76
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 19:58:00 -
[96] - Quote
Nguruthos IX wrote:Sete Clifton wrote:
Here is the direct quote:
"We currently have no plans to reset your characters' skill points to a state where they are equivalent to a newly created character, barring something catastrophic."
So yes, if something catastrophic happens, they can completely wipe SP.
Reset =/= wipe. In any other MMO type games you refer to respecing as resetting your skill points. Not 'deleting' them from use ever again. If we have to play the parse every word CCP ever says, then there's no point listening to them at all. Then words clarifying words will come months later and themselves be ambiguous. How can anyone trust that to make appropriate decisions with their time or money?
I realize the difference. However, they have made the distinction between a wipe/reset and a reallocation. This quote was a direct response to people asking if they were going to lose their SP in like in previous beta build resets when the game launched. |
General Tiberius1
ZionTCD Legacy Rising
332
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 19:59:00 -
[97] - Quote
Luke Vetri wrote:For the love of Kittens lock it already
There is so much mis-information here its stupid
CCP is probably enjoying all the trolling and idiocy in it
HI FOXFOUR!!!! o/ |
Nguruthos IX
Kameira Lodge Amarr Empire
173
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 20:00:00 -
[98] - Quote
Sete Clifton wrote:Nguruthos IX wrote:Sete Clifton wrote:
Here is the direct quote:
"We currently have no plans to reset your characters' skill points to a state where they are equivalent to a newly created character, barring something catastrophic."
So yes, if something catastrophic happens, they can completely wipe SP.
Reset =/= wipe. In any other MMO type games you refer to respecing as resetting your skill points. Not 'deleting' them from use ever again. If we have to play the parse every word CCP ever says, then there's no point listening to them at all. Then words clarifying words will come months later and themselves be ambiguous. How can anyone trust that to make appropriate decisions with their time or money? I realize the difference. However, they have made the distinction between a wipe/reset and a reallocation. This quote was a direct response to people asking if they were going to lose their SP like in previous beta build resets when the game launched.
If their term reset means to wipe all player data including name isk and assets, then it was used incorrectly in conjunction with the sentence "to reset your characters' skill points to a state where they are equivalent to a newly created character".
So on which account were they wrong? |
Sete Clifton
PSU GHOST SYNDICATE
76
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 20:03:00 -
[99] - Quote
Nguruthos IX wrote:Sete Clifton wrote:Nguruthos IX wrote:Sete Clifton wrote:
Here is the direct quote:
"We currently have no plans to reset your characters' skill points to a state where they are equivalent to a newly created character, barring something catastrophic."
So yes, if something catastrophic happens, they can completely wipe SP.
Reset =/= wipe. In any other MMO type games you refer to respecing as resetting your skill points. Not 'deleting' them from use ever again. If we have to play the parse every word CCP ever says, then there's no point listening to them at all. Then words clarifying words will come months later and themselves be ambiguous. How can anyone trust that to make appropriate decisions with their time or money? I realize the difference. However, they have made the distinction between a wipe/reset and a reallocation. This quote was a direct response to people asking if they were going to lose their SP like in previous beta build resets when the game launched. If their term reset means to wipe all player data including name isk and assets, then it was used incorrectly in conjunction with the sentence "to reset your characters' skill points to a state where they are equivalent to a newly created character". So on which account were they wrong?
They weren't necessarily wrong in their wording. As far as I'm aware they (and the community) have been using the term "reset" to refer to a complete wipe for the entire beta. Other games/devs might use the term in a different way, but that doesn't mean that CCP has to use the same arbitrary definition. |
Altina McAlterson
TRUE TEA BAGGERS
427
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 20:05:00 -
[100] - Quote
I'm still thinking that this has nothing to do with CCP. You bought the item from PSN store so I don't see how CCP is going to be under any obligation to do anything. |
|
Soraya Xel
Gentlemen's Foreign Legion Gentlemen's Agreement
32
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 20:05:00 -
[101] - Quote
Lord, we're still on this? Can we just ban this guy and move on? So a guy bought some stuff and blew it right away, despite the clear evidence that we were past the last reset. I'm sorry, suck it up, and move on. |
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
630
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 20:08:00 -
[102] - Quote
Nguruthos IX wrote: This quote says:
"We currently have no plans to reset your characters' skill points to a state where they are equivalent to a newly created character, barring something catastrophic."
Resetting my character's SP (retains the character), to a state equal to having created a new character (No longer having any SP allocated into any skill), will only happen if there is something catastrophic.
See? Assets are are not part of this, nor BPO, Nor ISK, Nor character name. The only grey area (which would be scummy at best) is what happens to the SP that is taken out of your skills.
The ONLY thing stated here for logical certainty is that they MAY have to remove SP from skills
A'hh I missed that.
Still the refund part came before CCP decided to this would be that last SP reset. So technically, if people want to take CCP to court over this then the "refund" part would override the part about "no Sp reset" .
People want to have their cake, eat it, and then get their money back anyway. |
sharted pantaloon
Zumari Force Projection Caldari State
36
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 20:14:00 -
[103] - Quote
heh, I really don't need my 20 bucks worth of aurum back at the expense of 4 months of SP grinding and my cheap BPO suits.
If they do reset SP, I hope to god they decide to change the SP payout system to 100% pasive like eve. That way I can just log on for 5 minutes once a day to assign my skill cue for the next few months while I allow the preparation H to have it's full effect. |
General Tiberius1
ZionTCD Legacy Rising
332
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 20:15:00 -
[104] - Quote
sharted pantaloon wrote:heh, I really don't need my 20 bucks worth of aurum back at the expense of 4 months of SP grinding and my cheap BPO suits.
If they do reset SP, I hope to god they decide to change the SP payout system to 100% pasive like eve. That way I can just log on for 5 minutes once a day to assign my skill cue for the next few months while I allow the preparation H to have it's full effect.
pure FPS players who have never played eve would throw a hissy fit
BAD IDEA |
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
630
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 20:17:00 -
[105] - Quote
General Tiberius1 wrote:sharted pantaloon wrote:heh, I really don't need my 20 bucks worth of aurum back at the expense of 4 months of SP grinding and my cheap BPO suits.
If they do reset SP, I hope to god they decide to change the SP payout system to 100% pasive like eve. That way I can just log on for 5 minutes once a day to assign my skill cue for the next few months while I allow the preparation H to have it's full effect. pure FPS players who have never played eve would throw a hissy fit BAD IDEA I already have my pitchfork and torch ready |
General Tiberius1
ZionTCD Legacy Rising
332
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 20:17:00 -
[106] - Quote
Sloth9230 wrote:Nguruthos IX wrote: This quote says:
"We currently have no plans to reset your characters' skill points to a state where they are equivalent to a newly created character, barring something catastrophic."
Resetting my character's SP (retains the character), to a state equal to having created a new character (No longer having any SP allocated into any skill), will only happen if there is something catastrophic.
See? Assets are are not part of this, nor BPO, Nor ISK, Nor character name. The only grey area (which would be scummy at best) is what happens to the SP that is taken out of your skills.
The ONLY thing stated here for logical certainty is that they MAY have to remove SP from skills
A'hh I missed that. Still the refund part came before CCP decided to this would be that last SP reset. So technically, if people want to take CCP to court over this then the "refund" part would override the part about "no Sp reset" . People want to have their cake, eat it, and then get their money back anyway.
the closed beta merc packs had wording that should never have been there, it allowed fot this whole mess
(even though i bought one of them, i'd prefer we just move on) |
Nguruthos IX
Kameira Lodge Amarr Empire
173
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 20:45:00 -
[107] - Quote
Here's the thing. Lets say CCP has the flexibility (due to miscommunication, misleading, or ambiguous quotes) to do literally whatever they want. And practically I'm sure they do.
Why should they choose NOT to reset anything?
Lets be honest. Who believes that the core player-base of this game is not already playing it? Who really thinks that re-branding same game from "beta" to "release" will magically cause an massive influx of curious new players? Anyone interested by now, or by that point will have already downloaded, tested the game, and determined it's merits and potential.
Therefore who would be most enraged by doing a hard-reset of characters, SP (non-reallocative), ISK, assets, BPOs, etc? The core player-base, which at that point will virtually be everyone who will be playing it.
Seems like a bad idea from a company PR standpoint to screw people like that: People who are their primary source of income, support, and advertising.
Who would such a measure appease? The illusive and perhaps nonexistent few new, causal CoD come-overs who flow in and out of games like a passing cool breeze. But it won't run a wind farm. |
Ruyan Aldent
Planetary Response Organisation Test Friends Please Ignore
50
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 21:45:00 -
[108] - Quote
Nguruthos IX wrote:Here's the thing. Lets say CCP has the flexibility (due to miscommunication, misleading, or ambiguous quotes) to do literally whatever they want. And practically I'm sure they do.
Why should they choose NOT to reset anything?
Lets be honest. Who believes that the core player-base of this game is not already playing it? Who really thinks that re-branding same game from "beta" to "release" will magically cause an massive influx of curious new players? Anyone interested by now, or by that point will have already downloaded, tested the game, and determined it's merits and potential.
Therefore who would be most enraged by doing a hard-reset of characters, SP (non-reallocative), ISK, assets, BPOs, etc? The core player-base, which at that point will virtually be everyone who will be playing it.
Seems like a bad idea from a company PR standpoint to screw people like that: People who are their primary source of income, support, and advertising.
Who would such a measure appease? The illusive and perhaps nonexistent few new, causal CoD come-overs who flow in and out of games like a passing cool breeze. But it won't run a wind farm.
So your saying that you dont think mass marketing which they said they plan to do will bring in new players over the years nor that people will come back to the game once it is fully released because they didnt feel like playing the same 3 games mode repeatedly? |
Zekain Kade
BetaMax. CRONOS.
1089
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 21:49:00 -
[109] - Quote
Maken Tosch wrote:CCP really needs to step up their game in terms of communicating. I'm not taking about with us but with themselves (as in the GMs and Devs).
But overall, CCP does have a ton of petitions to handle. Consider this:
Eve Online (Tranquility Server - London): 500,000 Subscribers Eve Online (Serenity Server - China): about 100,000 or less subscribers Dust 514 (Tranquility Server): About 400,000 to 500,000 free accounts (assuming every player has created 3 alt characters)
That's well over a million players to handle petitions from. I'm pretty sure they are able to find out how many players they have by tracking e very unique ip that signs up to eve |
Baal Roo
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
999
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 21:49:00 -
[110] - Quote
tribal wyvern wrote:Well if a$$holes keep pushing for aur refund and we get it, that means sp wipe too, and reset of assets. Which means everyone (including myself) who purchased all bpo items before the price increase will lose those too. So those of us who created militia fits for cheap to fall back on....will be forced to spend $30 on one militia fit. Carry on trying to F uck things up people, you may just manage it. If the above happens, as much as I love dust, I'm done!
I love it. You're calling people assholes for wanting their REAL WORLD purchases honored, because it's going to screw up your little in-game money making scheme.
The irony is so thick I could cut it with a chainsaw. |
|
ICECREAMK1NG
WARRIORS 1NC
440
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 00:07:00 -
[111] - Quote
CCP Eterne wrote:We are not in Commercial Release. Any statements of such from a GM was inaccurate.
Wrong.
Anyone who owns a playstation is able to download this game.
CCP are taking money for products in this game, that is commerce.
This is a commercial release. |
General Tiberius1
ZionTCD Legacy Rising
338
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 00:08:00 -
[112] - Quote
ICECREAMK1NG wrote:CCP Eterne wrote:We are not in Commercial Release. Any statements of such from a GM was inaccurate. Wrong. Anyone who owns a playstation is able to download this game. CCP are taking money for products in this game, that is commerce. This is a commercial release.
don't use logic on them, they'll just get pissy |
Buster Friently
Rosen Association
202
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 00:09:00 -
[113] - Quote
ICECREAMK1NG wrote:CCP Eterne wrote:We are not in Commercial Release. Any statements of such from a GM was inaccurate. Wrong. Anyone who owns a playstation is able to download this game. CCP are taking money for products in this game, that is commerce. This is a commercial release.
I pretty much agree with this statement. Commercial release is a legal term, and I don't think CCP gets to define what it means to suit their desires. I'm no lawyer though.
I've seen this in other betas as well, namely MWO. They get around this issue by referring, not to commercial release, but to "launch" a made up term that the they can define however they want. |
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
634
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 00:16:00 -
[114] - Quote
Buster Friently wrote:ICECREAMK1NG wrote:CCP Eterne wrote:We are not in Commercial Release. Any statements of such from a GM was inaccurate. Wrong. Anyone who owns a playstation is able to download this game. CCP are taking money for products in this game, that is commerce. This is a commercial release. I pretty much agree with this statement. Commercial release is a legal term, and I don't think CCP gets to define what it means to suit their desires. I'm no lawyer though. I've seen this in other betas as well, namely MWO. They get around this issue by referring, not to commercial release, but to "launch" a made up term that the they can define however they want. No no, ICECREAM is right on this one. Commercial Release just means it's available to everyone, technically that would just make it a open beta, but the fact that they're charging for items brings it back to commercial release. Or is everyone who buys Aurum items at this point simply making donations? I don't think so CCP.
So yeah, it's an incomplete game but it's an incomplete game that they're selling |
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
634
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 00:22:00 -
[115] - Quote
I do applaud Eterne for at least showing up though. |
Altina McAlterson
TRUE TEA BAGGERS
428
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 01:35:00 -
[116] - Quote
Sloth9230 wrote:Buster Friently wrote:ICECREAMK1NG wrote:CCP Eterne wrote:We are not in Commercial Release. Any statements of such from a GM was inaccurate. Wrong. Anyone who owns a playstation is able to download this game. CCP are taking money for products in this game, that is commerce. This is a commercial release. I pretty much agree with this statement. Commercial release is a legal term, and I don't think CCP gets to define what it means to suit their desires. I'm no lawyer though. I've seen this in other betas as well, namely MWO. They get around this issue by referring, not to commercial release, but to "launch" a made up term that the they can define however they want. No no, ICECREAM is right on this one. Commercial Release just means it's available to everyone, technically that would just make it an open beta, but the fact that they're charging for items brings it back to commercial release. Or is everyone who buys Aurum items at this point simply making donations? I don't think so CCP. So yeah, it's an incomplete game, but it's an incomplete game that they're selling
If anyone can link some proof of any of this that would be very helpful. Especially any links that confirm companies are required by law to call the game an "open BETA" or "Commercial Release" because some criteria has been met. Since this is a download-only game there's no manufacturer to ship it to for production, so it seems the commercial release is whenever the hell CCP feels it calling it that.
Until proof shows up there's this crap. These aren't intended to be conclusive, but it does seem apparent the BETA vs Release is based solely on the what the company thinks the state of the game is, not any other factors.
http://mwomercs.com/forums/topic/56334-clarification-closed-beta-vs-open-beta-vs-releaselaunch-and-status/
http://mmohuts.com/editorials/what-does-closed-beta-mean
I know those aren't links to precedent cases before the Supreme Court but it's interesting that the mechwarrior thread is very similar to what is being said here but I still haven't seen proof of any of it. Got tired of googling it after like 5 minutes. |
Himiko Kuronaga
SyNergy Gaming
117
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 01:39:00 -
[117] - Quote
I feel pretty bad for Eterne tbh.
His company is making him say this stuff, even though its wrong, and that reflects badly on him.
Reminds me of working retail. |
Maken Tosch
Planetary Response Organisation Test Friends Please Ignore
1807
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 01:42:00 -
[118] - Quote
Himiko Kuronaga wrote:I feel pretty bad for Eterne tbh.
His company is making him say this stuff, even though its wrong, and that reflects badly on him.
Reminds me of working retail.
Why else do you think I quit those jobs? |
General Tiberius1
ZionTCD Legacy Rising
341
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 01:45:00 -
[119] - Quote
yeah, PR doesn't sound like a fun job |
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
636
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 01:47:00 -
[120] - Quote
Altina McAlterson wrote: I know those aren't links to precedent cases before the Supreme Court but it's interesting that the mechwarrior thread is very similar to what is being said here but I still haven't seen proof of any of it. Got tired of googling it after like 5 minutes.
Remember what I said about stabbing people with a knife? Whether a court/CCP calls this a commercial release or not has nothing to do whether it actually is one. CCP can deny it, but they are selling an incomplete product. |
|
Kane Fyea
BetaMax. CRONOS.
112
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 01:52:00 -
[121] - Quote
If I get a SP reset because of this I will be soooo fkin mad..... |
Buster Friently
Rosen Association
208
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 02:00:00 -
[122] - Quote
Altina McAlterson wrote:Sloth9230 wrote:Buster Friently wrote:ICECREAMK1NG wrote:CCP Eterne wrote:We are not in Commercial Release. Any statements of such from a GM was inaccurate. Wrong. Anyone who owns a playstation is able to download this game. CCP are taking money for products in this game, that is commerce. This is a commercial release. I pretty much agree with this statement. Commercial release is a legal term, and I don't think CCP gets to define what it means to suit their desires. I'm no lawyer though. I've seen this in other betas as well, namely MWO. They get around this issue by referring, not to commercial release, but to "launch" a made up term that the they can define however they want. No no, ICECREAM is right on this one. Commercial Release just means it's available to everyone, technically that would just make it an open beta, but the fact that they're charging for items brings it back to commercial release. Or is everyone who buys Aurum items at this point simply making donations? I don't think so CCP. So yeah, it's an incomplete game, but it's an incomplete game that they're selling If anyone can link some proof of any of this that would be very helpful. Especially any links that confirm companies are required by law to call the game an "open BETA" or "Commercial Release" because some criteria has been met. Since this is a download-only game there's no manufacturer to ship it to for production, so it seems the commercial release is whenever the hell CCP feels it calling it that. Until proof shows up there's this crap. These aren't intended to be conclusive, but it does seem apparent the BETA vs Release is based solely on the what the company thinks the state of the game is, not any other factors. http://mwomercs.com/forums/topic/56334-clarification-closed-beta-vs-open-beta-vs-releaselaunch-and-status/http://mmohuts.com/editorials/what-does-closed-beta-meanI know those aren't links to precedent cases before the Supreme Court but it's interesting that the mechwarrior thread is very similar to what is being said here but I still haven't seen proof of any of it. Got tired of googling it after like 5 minutes.
MWO used their own label though "Launch" not "Commercial Release" Who knows really. I don't want to see a reset personally, and I hope they don't do one.
|
Altina McAlterson
TRUE TEA BAGGERS
428
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 02:00:00 -
[123] - Quote
Sloth9230 wrote:Altina McAlterson wrote: If anyone can link some proof of any of this that would be very helpful. Especially any links that confirm companies are required by law to call the game an "open BETA" or "Commercial Release" because some criteria has been met. Since this is a download-only game there's no manufacturer to ship it to for production, so it seems the commercial release is whenever the hell CCP feels it calling it that.
Remember what I said about stabbing people with a knife? Whether a court/CCP calls this a commercial release or not has nothing to do whether it actually is one. CCP can deny it, but they are selling an incomplete product. Yea, I remember. But we're arguing two different things. You're talking about an event that either did or did not happen. I'm talking about something that is not concrete. A commercial release is one that the company feels is ready to be called the "Final Product." Traditionally it would be when it was sent to the manufacturer, or when the game code was complete and locked with no plans for future major changes. Since this is a game that they plan to continually add on to I guess it would mean one that they feel comfortable not having to have a big "Don't worry! We're gonna add more stuff!" disclaimer at the top of it.
DUST is free, you bought AUR. No one made you buy AUR. It's a Commercial Release when they say it is. Because it's a term that expresses where the company feels the game is in the development cycle. These aren't laws, or set in stone things like everyone seems to think. It's honestly just semantics but there's literally nothing else to talk about. |
Nicol Bolas Planeswalker
Seituoda Taskforce Command Caldari State
102
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 02:03:00 -
[124] - Quote
I'm loleaving forever and ever if we get reset.
|
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
638
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 02:08:00 -
[125] - Quote
Altina McAlterson wrote:
DUST is free, you bought AUR.
I bought nothing |
Altina McAlterson
TRUE TEA BAGGERS
428
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 02:18:00 -
[126] - Quote
Sloth9230 wrote:Altina McAlterson wrote:
DUST is free, you bought AUR.
I bought nothing Well played. |
JL3Eleven
Pink Fluffy Bounty Hunterz Noir. Mercenary Group
223
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 02:24:00 -
[127] - Quote
You cannot force the people who bought merc packs to take a reset of SP if they want to get what you promised them. If you reset anyone you need to reset everyone, no option BS. |
Kane Fyea
BetaMax. CRONOS.
113
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 02:30:00 -
[128] - Quote
JL3Eleven wrote:You cannot force the people who bought merc packs to take a reset of SP if they want to get what you promised them. If you reset anyone you need to reset everyone, no option BS. Yes they can. |
Baal Roo
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
1007
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 02:41:00 -
[129] - Quote
Kane Fyea wrote:JL3Eleven wrote:You cannot force the people who bought merc packs to take a reset of SP if they want to get what you promised them. If you reset anyone you need to reset everyone, no option BS. Yes they can.
Yeah, they CAN, but if they do they can also expect a whole lot of people (myself included) to delete the game. |
JL3Eleven
Pink Fluffy Bounty Hunterz Noir. Mercenary Group
223
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 02:41:00 -
[130] - Quote
Kane Fyea wrote:JL3Eleven wrote:You cannot force the people who bought merc packs to take a reset of SP if they want to get what you promised them. If you reset anyone you need to reset everyone, no option BS. Yes they can.
How would that be fair? Here is what we promised you but you must give me something else?
I'm fine with it as long as everyone gets reset to square one not just punishing those that actually support the game. |
|
Buster Friently
Rosen Association
209
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 02:43:00 -
[131] - Quote
JL3Eleven wrote:Kane Fyea wrote:JL3Eleven wrote:You cannot force the people who bought merc packs to take a reset of SP if they want to get what you promised them. If you reset anyone you need to reset everyone, no option BS. Yes they can. How would that be fair? Here is what we promised you but you must give me something else? I'm fine with it as long as everyone gets reset to square one not just punishing those that actually support the game.
No one is forced to do something that they don't want to? That sounds pretty fair to me.
Specifically. I'm referring to the option part, not so much the "you must reset SP to get your AUR returned" |
JL3Eleven
Pink Fluffy Bounty Hunterz Noir. Mercenary Group
223
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 02:43:00 -
[132] - Quote
Baal Roo wrote:Kane Fyea wrote:JL3Eleven wrote:You cannot force the people who bought merc packs to take a reset of SP if they want to get what you promised them. If you reset anyone you need to reset everyone, no option BS. Yes they can. Yeah, they CAN, but if they do they can also expect a whole lot of people (myself included) to delete the game.
^^^ This plus people will go out of their way to badmouth the game everywhere on the webs and RL. |
JL3Eleven
Pink Fluffy Bounty Hunterz Noir. Mercenary Group
223
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 02:45:00 -
[133] - Quote
Buster Friently wrote:JL3Eleven wrote:Kane Fyea wrote:JL3Eleven wrote:You cannot force the people who bought merc packs to take a reset of SP if they want to get what you promised them. If you reset anyone you need to reset everyone, no option BS. Yes they can. How would that be fair? Here is what we promised you but you must give me something else? I'm fine with it as long as everyone gets reset to square one not just punishing those that actually support the game. No one is forced to do something that they don't want to? That sounds pretty fair to me.
I would be forced to take a reset to get my promised Aurum instead of keeping my sp. So how is that not forcing me to do something? |
Buster Friently
Rosen Association
209
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 02:46:00 -
[134] - Quote
JL3Eleven wrote:Buster Friently wrote:JL3Eleven wrote:Kane Fyea wrote:JL3Eleven wrote:You cannot force the people who bought merc packs to take a reset of SP if they want to get what you promised them. If you reset anyone you need to reset everyone, no option BS. Yes they can. How would that be fair? Here is what we promised you but you must give me something else? I'm fine with it as long as everyone gets reset to square one not just punishing those that actually support the game. No one is forced to do something that they don't want to? That sounds pretty fair to me. I would be forced to take a reset to get my promised Aurum instead of keeping my sp. So how is that not forcing me to do something?
Yeah, I realized my post wasn't too clear. I'm specifically referring to the option part, not so much that to get the AUR refunded, you'll need to take a reset to SP. |
crazy space 1
ZionTCD Legacy Rising
976
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 02:51:00 -
[135] - Quote
They can refund JUST AUR GUYS
SP can stay intact |
Illuminaughty-696
Omega Risk Control Services
233
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 02:52:00 -
[136] - Quote
Can anyone confirm that what CCP meant by the no more SP resets meant no more resets ever?
As in, I thought it meant no more resets during the beta, but that there would be one for the final version (won't say commercial release right now as I would have in the past due to the situation at hand).
One of my biggest issues with the change in wording is that if SP is reset for the final release BUT aurum is not, then bwuh? If aurum is reset but SP is not, then . . . bleh. There is no other way this works except to reset both or neither. Neither would still be problematic, as mentioned here, but both will annoy people, too. Nice pickle you have there, CCP. |
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
639
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 02:56:00 -
[137] - Quote
There should be two options as far as the refund
1. Give up a portion of your SP to refund your merc pack with the 30 day booster 2. Get the merc pack back without a booster. Maybe throw in a three day booster as a gift.
|
Cross Atu
Conspiratus Immortalis
858
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 03:15:00 -
[138] - Quote
So for those into the whole "commercial release" debate, is Playstation Home in commercial release?
/rolls in asbestos and exits stage left
EDIT:
Sloth9230 wrote:There should be two options as far as the refund
1. Give up a portion of your SP to refund your merc pack with the 30 day booster 2. Get the merc pack back without a booster. Maybe throw in a three day booster as a gift.
^This actually seems pretty reasonable. |
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
641
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 03:17:00 -
[139] - Quote
Cross Atu wrote:So for those into the whole "commercial release" debate, is Playstation Home in commercial release? /rolls in asbestos and exits stage left EDIT: Sloth9230 wrote:There should be two options as far as the refund
1. Give up a portion of your SP to refund your merc pack with the 30 day booster 2. Get the merc pack back without a booster. Maybe throw in a three day booster as a gift.
^This actually seems pretty reasonable. Are they selling you stuff? |
Cross Atu
Conspiratus Immortalis
858
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 03:21:00 -
[140] - Quote
Sentient Archon wrote:Buster Friently wrote:
The game is already live. Do you mean launched? Or out of beta?
Maybe I've missed something, but I don't think they've said that May 6th/14th is the end of beta, have they?
Its when no one says "Its a beta" when **** hits the fan! CCP has given it a title "Uprising". Anything with a title is either a new build or an expansion.
Even the builds in closed beta had titles, this one is Chromosome, the last was Codex, etc. Naming the beta builds doesn't really change the context of it being a beta. |
|
Cross Atu
Conspiratus Immortalis
858
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 03:24:00 -
[141] - Quote
Sloth9230 wrote:Cross Atu wrote:So for those into the whole "commercial release" debate, is Playstation Home in commercial release? /rolls in asbestos and exits stage left EDIT: Sloth9230 wrote:There should be two options as far as the refund
1. Give up a portion of your SP to refund your merc pack with the 30 day booster 2. Get the merc pack back without a booster. Maybe throw in a three day booster as a gift.
^This actually seems pretty reasonable. Are they selling you stuff?
Playstation Home? Oh yes, not me personally but there are people who've spent thousands of dollars on micro transactions there. For the record (last I bothered to check) Sony officially says it's in open beta. |
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
642
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 03:27:00 -
[142] - Quote
Cross Atu wrote: Playstation Home? Oh yes, not me personally but there are people who've spent thousands of dollars on micro transactions there. For the record (last I bothered to check) Sony officially says it's in open beta.
Then Sony is relying on people being suckers and being dumb enough to pay for a **** product. |
Altina McAlterson
TRUE TEA BAGGERS
431
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 03:28:00 -
[143] - Quote
Sloth9230 wrote:Cross Atu wrote:So for those into the whole "commercial release" debate, is Playstation Home in commercial release? /rolls in asbestos and exits stage left EDIT: Sloth9230 wrote:There should be two options as far as the refund
1. Give up a portion of your SP to refund your merc pack with the 30 day booster 2. Get the merc pack back without a booster. Maybe throw in a three day booster as a gift.
^This actually seems pretty reasonable. Are they selling you stuff? Does it matter? No. Everyone seems to think the "Commercial Release" is related to payment. I've said it 1,000 times and I'm going to keep saying it until everybody stops being stupid. "Commercial Release" is a stage of development that indicates the software does not need any additional testing and no additional code is to be added. It is when the developer says it is. They can charge for whatever the hell they want so long as they make it clear what you are buying. Which they did. So it's BETA until they say otherwise. |
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
642
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 03:30:00 -
[144] - Quote
Altina McAlterson wrote:Sloth9230 wrote:Cross Atu wrote:So for those into the whole "commercial release" debate, is Playstation Home in commercial release? /rolls in asbestos and exits stage left EDIT: Sloth9230 wrote:There should be two options as far as the refund
1. Give up a portion of your SP to refund your merc pack with the 30 day booster 2. Get the merc pack back without a booster. Maybe throw in a three day booster as a gift.
^This actually seems pretty reasonable. Are they selling you stuff? Does it matter? No. Everyone seems to think the "Commercial Release" is related to payment. I've said it 1,000 times and I'm going to keep saying it until everybody stops being stupid. "Commercial Release" is a stage of development that indicates the software does not need any additional testing and no additional code is to be added. It is when the developer says it is. They can charge for whatever the hell they want so long as they make it clear what you are buying. Which they did. So it's BETA until they say otherwise. I guess if you want to see it that way. And yes, people do know what they're getting themselves into, still suckers unless they're buying boosters. |
Laheon
Osmon Surveillance Caldari State
297
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 03:33:00 -
[145] - Quote
Seriously? Is this thread still going on? AFTER CCP Eterne said that commercial release hasn't happened yet? |
Altina McAlterson
TRUE TEA BAGGERS
431
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 03:34:00 -
[146] - Quote
Sloth9230 wrote:Altina McAlterson wrote:Sloth9230 wrote:Cross Atu wrote:So for those into the whole "commercial release" debate, is Playstation Home in commercial release? /rolls in asbestos and exits stage left EDIT: Sloth9230 wrote:There should be two options as far as the refund
1. Give up a portion of your SP to refund your merc pack with the 30 day booster 2. Get the merc pack back without a booster. Maybe throw in a three day booster as a gift.
^This actually seems pretty reasonable. Are they selling you stuff? Does it matter? No. Everyone seems to think the "Commercial Release" is related to payment. I've said it 1,000 times and I'm going to keep saying it until everybody stops being stupid. "Commercial Release" is a stage of development that indicates the software does not need any additional testing and no additional code is to be added. It is when the developer says it is. They can charge for whatever the hell they want so long as they make it clear what you are buying. Which they did. So it's BETA until they say otherwise. I guess if you want to see it that way. And yes, people do know what they're getting themselves into, still suckers unless they're buying boosters.
I'm just curious as to what you mean by "see it that way"?
I'm not being a jerk, I just don't understand what everyone is so confused about.
|
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
642
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 03:37:00 -
[147] - Quote
Altina McAlterson wrote:
I'm just curious as to what you mean by "see it that way"?
I'm not being a jerk, I just don't understand what everyone is so confused about.
It depends on what you see as CR, I see it the instant they start selling a product, So to me this is CR. |
Altina McAlterson
TRUE TEA BAGGERS
431
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 03:47:00 -
[148] - Quote
Sloth9230 wrote:Altina McAlterson wrote:
I'm just curious as to what you mean by "see it that way"?
I'm not being a jerk, I just don't understand what everyone is so confused about.
It depends on what you see as CR, I see it the instant they start selling a product, So to me this is CR. Ok. But that's not what it means, so I guess that's the issue. And they sold AUR. No one made you use it now. Not like the stuff expires. Call it Commercial Release all you want, so long as you understand that it isn't that at all I guess. |
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
643
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 03:56:00 -
[149] - Quote
Altina McAlterson wrote:Sloth9230 wrote:Altina McAlterson wrote:
I'm just curious as to what you mean by "see it that way"?
I'm not being a jerk, I just don't understand what everyone is so confused about.
It depends on what you see as CR, I see it the instant they start selling a product, So to me this is CR. Ok. But that's not what it means, so I guess that's the issue. And they sold AUR. No one made you use it now. Not like the stuff expires. Call it Commercial Release all you want, so long as you understand that it isn't that at all I guess. Offering the product means it's ready to be sold, if it's not then why sell it. Commercial release for sofware simply means it's availbe to everyone for purchase instead of only an exclusive group of people having access to it. Dust isn't finished, but that hasn't stopped them from selling it/Aur. And yes, Aur is the product not Dust, the point still stands. |
Victin Ashis
Universal Allies Inc.
13
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 04:10:00 -
[150] - Quote
This whole ******* idiotic argument is moot as the disclaimer clearly states that merc pack items will refunded in the case of a character reset. It also says that they MAY need to reset not that they are guaranteed to. This includes commercial release. I bought 2 merc packs under that disclaimer and I found it quite simple to understand as do apparently many others here.
The rest of these arguments just seem like an attempt to double down on what you purchased once. Here is the simplest way to answer the question of whether you got what you paid for with the merc pack:
Did you get: 'Dragonfly' Scout dropsuit x 1 (Unlimited) (Y/N) 'Toxin' ICD-9 Submachine Gun x 1 (Unlimited) (Y/N) HK4M Shotgun x 50 (Y/N) Hacked Drop Uplink x 50 (Y/N) Fused Locus Grenade x 50 (Y/N) 1.5dn Myofibril Stimulant x 50 (Y/N) 30 day active sp 40 000 aurum.
if you answered Y to all those things you got what you paid for when you purchased the merc pack. You're terrible reading comprehension is not a good enough reason for ccp to refund you the merc pack
|
|
Sylvana Nightwind
Expert Intervention Caldari State
169
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 04:25:00 -
[151] - Quote
crazy space 1 wrote:They can refund JUST AUR GUYS
SP can stay intact Quoting again for true, and can 99% of this thread stop being stupid. You will get your AUR refund and stop crying |
Victin Ashis
Universal Allies Inc.
13
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 04:32:00 -
[152] - Quote
Sylvana Nightwind wrote:crazy space 1 wrote:They can refund JUST AUR GUYS
SP can stay intact Quoting again for true, and can 99% of this thread stop being stupid. You will get your AUR refund and stop crying
SP cannot stay intact because some of that sp was earned at an accelerated rate using booster's included or bought with the aurum included with the merc pack. why is this concept so difficult for some people? |
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
646
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 04:42:00 -
[153] - Quote
Victin Ashis wrote:Sylvana Nightwind wrote:crazy space 1 wrote:They can refund JUST AUR GUYS
SP can stay intact Quoting again for true, and can 99% of this thread stop being stupid. You will get your AUR refund and stop crying SP cannot stay intact because some of that sp was earned at an accelerated rate using booster's included or bought with the aurum included with the merc pack. why is this concept so difficult for some people? Because they ate their cake, and now they then want another cake. |
Autist's Fury
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
0
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 04:52:00 -
[154] - Quote
REJOICE MY PEOPLE I HAVE HEARD YOUR SPURG, I AM HERE. |
JL3Eleven
Pink Fluffy Bounty Hunterz Noir. Mercenary Group
226
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 04:58:00 -
[155] - Quote
Victin Ashis wrote:Sylvana Nightwind wrote:crazy space 1 wrote:They can refund JUST AUR GUYS
SP can stay intact Quoting again for true, and can 99% of this thread stop being stupid. You will get your AUR refund and stop crying SP cannot stay intact because some of that sp was earned at an accelerated rate using booster's included or bought with the aurum included with the merc pack. why is this concept so difficult for some people?
Sorry you didn't support CCP earlier and now want everyone who did to pay. You mad I have BPO's and an extra Million SP also? |
Altina McAlterson
TRUE TEA BAGGERS
433
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 05:21:00 -
[156] - Quote
Sloth9230 wrote:Altina McAlterson wrote:[quote=Sloth9230][quote=Altina McAlterson]
I'm just curious as to what you mean by "see it that way"?
I'm not being a jerk, I just don't understand what everyone is so confused about.
Commercial release for sofware simply means it's available to everyone for purchase instead of only an exclusive group of people having access to it No it doesn't. So an open BETA doesn't exist? If it's open then it is available to everyone and so therefor has to be a commercial release? You said "for purchase", maybe that's your metric then? How much did you pay for your copy of DUST? I'm beginning to hope you are trolling me because I'm starting to get concerned.
So who has jurisdiction over what CCP calls it? DEA? ATF? RIAA? They're from Iceland but this DEV team is in China so maybe it's Interpol? A company can sell a "BETA" as easily as they can sell a "Commercial Release" so long as it is expressly understood what it is you are paying for.
So now that argument can be put to bed and people can stop sounding stupid. It says BETA at the top, it's a BETA. Nothing makes it anything else until the company says so. Simple concept, really. It is what CCP says it is. There is no room for debate or misunderstanding. It has nothing to do with them selling AUR or not. It has nothing to do with who has access to it. These are terms used by software developers to communicate where they feel the game is in the development cycle.
They've been accepting money for it since the beginning of closed BETA, right? So I'm guessing everyone thinks it never was a BETA and just went straight to commercial release?
|
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
648
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 05:53:00 -
[157] - Quote
Altina McAlterson wrote:
So now that argument can be put to bed and people can stop sounding stupid. It says BETA at the top, it's a BETA. Nothing makes it anything else until the company says so. Simple concept, really. It is what CCP says it is. There is no room for debate or misunderstanding. It has nothing to do with them selling AUR or not. It has nothing to do with who has access to it. These are terms used by software developers to communicate where they feel the game is in the development cycle.
They've been accepting money for it since the beginning of closed BETA, right? So I'm guessing everyone thinks it never was a BETA and just went straight to commercial release?
No more refunds. If you lose something now then it's gone.
An open beta is where you let potential costumers test the product and mess around with it. Key word being "potential" customers, we are no longer potential customers, well maybe I am since I haven't bought anything, but anyone who has bought something is a customer, not a potential customer.
How much did I pay for Dust? Nothing, because they don't charge for playing, they charge for items, Dust relies on micro transactions. So asking me how I much paid was a stupid question.
CCP can call it whatever they want, it doesn't change what it is. |
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
648
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 06:05:00 -
[158] - Quote
Let me make this simple for you.
Take what we have now and put it on a disc and include an access code for a "free" merc pack, then send it to to Gamestop and have them charge 20 for the game. You're going to tell me that that wasn't a commercial release? What difference does it make if people paid for Dust or the merc pack? People are still spending money on this. |
Altina McAlterson
TRUE TEA BAGGERS
435
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 06:13:00 -
[159] - Quote
Sloth9230 wrote:
CCP can call it whatever they want, it doesn't change what it is.
Ok, we're done. I was debating this with you because I was bored and it was what I thought a simple concept. I'm still bored and its still simple but this isn't any fun any more.
You have addressed exactly none of the points I've made. If you want to debate someone it is good practice to listen to what they say and respond to them. Ignoring them completely and just saying "everything is what I think it is because I said so" doesn't get anybody anywhere.
And also that phrase I quoted up there just plain makes me sad.
|
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
648
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 06:20:00 -
[160] - Quote
Altina McAlterson wrote:Sloth9230 wrote:
CCP can call it whatever they want, it doesn't change what it is.
Ok, we're done. I was debating this with you because I was bored and it was what I thought a simple concept. I'm still bored and its still simple but this isn't any fun any more. You have addressed exactly none of the points I've made. If you want to debate someone it is good practice to listen to what they say and respond to them. Ignoring them completely and just saying "everything is what I think it is because I said so" doesn't get anybody anywhere. And also that phrase I quoted up there just plain makes me sad. And what points have you made? All you said was "CCP said it's not a commercial release, therefore it's not". You know what they say, "if it quacks like a duck..." |
|
Victin Ashis
Universal Allies Inc.
14
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 07:10:00 -
[161] - Quote
JL3Eleven wrote:Victin Ashis wrote:Sylvana Nightwind wrote:crazy space 1 wrote:They can refund JUST AUR GUYS
SP can stay intact Quoting again for true, and can 99% of this thread stop being stupid. You will get your AUR refund and stop crying SP cannot stay intact because some of that sp was earned at an accelerated rate using booster's included or bought with the aurum included with the merc pack. why is this concept so difficult for some people? Sorry you didn't support CCP earlier and now want everyone who did to pay. You mad I have BPO's and an extra Million SP also?
I bought my first of 3 merc pacs when they only gave out 4000 aurum. Try again skippy |
Laurent Cazaderon
Villore Sec Ops Gallente Federation
1245
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 08:32:00 -
[162] - Quote
i dont give a crap having my AUR back. i'm not that cheap of a player to try and screw those over.
A bad line in a product description doesnt mean you HAVE to try and use it. To me, AUR has to be refund when the progress you made using it is ERASED. That's it.
And i dont want to see anything erased. that's for sure.
|
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
648
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 08:42:00 -
[163] - Quote
Laurent Cazaderon wrote:i dont give a crap having my AUR back. i'm not that cheap of a player to try and screw those over.
A bad line in a product description doesnt mean you HAVE to try and use it. To me, AUR has to be refund when the progress you made using it is ERASED. That's it.
And i dont want to see anything erased. that's for sure.
No, CCP is not allowed to make mistakes without the player base gaining something from it. |
Nirwanda Vaughns
Planetary Response Organisation Test Friends Please Ignore
24
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 09:06:00 -
[164] - Quote
Bout 7 weeks ago when i learned that this 'was it' i told my corp mates i could see a lot of people kicking off about spending AUR in the belief that since its a beta they will get it back when commercial release kicks in and there would be a big uprising and demand for a reset for all the AUR wasted on the battlefield, i was told not to be silly
but tbh at first i wondered about getting a reset myself but i've made the most of all the boosters i bought and i have the sever/raven bpo's to use so i'm not that fussy now even to the fact that i would prefer to stay as i am now since i have spent some serious grinding after being told that we wouldn't be reset anymore.
if anything the only request i want on 'commercial' release is SPs set to unallocated to rebuild my char. i remember a dev post saying something along the lines that its unfair to ask us to test weapons and suits using our sp and be stuck with it so a reallocation would be most likely
|
Rasatsu
Much Crying Old Experts
553
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 09:30:00 -
[165] - Quote
Victin Ashis wrote:I bought my first of 3 merc pacs when they only gave out 4000 aurum. Try again skippy That 4,000 AURUM was actually worth the same as the 40,000 AURUM is now...
Besides, as I've said earlier in this thread; CCP should give people the option to reset everything and get back their AURUM and BPCs.
Though I can't personally figure out why anyone would want to go back to 500k SP and grind all the way back up while the rest of us are going to be running around with millions of SP and lots of officer loot. |
Dalton Smithe
OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention
75
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 09:32:00 -
[166] - Quote
This thread is still going? Man I have to give it to the community, you guys take the ball and run with it..... |
Rasatsu
Much Crying Old Experts
553
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 09:57:00 -
[167] - Quote
Dalton Smithe wrote:This thread is still going? Man I have to give it to the community, you guys take the ball and run with it..... http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=4PcL6-mjRNk#t=44s |
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
648
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 10:05:00 -
[168] - Quote
Rasatsu wrote:Victin Ashis wrote:I bought my first of 3 merc pacs when they only gave out 4000 aurum. Try again skippy That 4,000 AURUM was actually worth the same as the 40,000 AURUM is now... Besides, as I've said earlier in this thread; CCP should give people the option to reset everything and get back their AURUM and BPCs. Though I can't personally figure out why anyone would want to go back to 500k SP and grind all the way back up while the rest of us are going to be running around with millions of SP and lots of officer loot. Well CCP said they would never reset SP so as to make a character equal to a newly created character, so they should give them 600kSP, y'now, since people want to be literal and all |
Imp Smash
On The Brink CRONOS.
76
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 11:20:00 -
[169] - Quote
I'm not sure how they could refund aur. Bpos are one thing. You can just buy em again. But expended items such as boosters, equipment lost in battle, and uvts-- that'd be impossible. As such an aur refund probably would end up including a reset. |
Altina McAlterson
TRUE TEA BAGGERS
437
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 11:22:00 -
[170] - Quote
Sloth9230 wrote:Let me make this simple for you.
Take what we have now and put it on a disc, include an access code for a "free" merc pack, then send it to Gamestop and have them charge 20 for the game. You're going to tell me that that wasn't a commercial release? What difference does it make if people paid for Dust or the merc pack? People are still spending money on this. No, that wouldn't be Commercial Release if it still a BETA.
I swore I was done with this but it's DT and I seriously can't let this fly. For the umpteenth time, the words "Commercial Release" are industry terms and have nothing to do with whether or not it was paid for. Companies can charge for a BETA and it will still be a BETA and the can give away a title that is a Commercial Release for free.
Again, just because you paid for it does not make it a Commercial Release. It simply means a stage in development that the company feels the product is complete enough to not need a disclaimer telling people that more features are coming. The Commercial Release stage also deals with how stable the developer think the product is and so on.
A Commercial Release is not related to whether or not people pay for.
Whether or not people pay for it has no bearing on it being in the Commercial Release stage.
Whether or not people pay for it and the products status as BETA or Commercial Release are not related.
If you read what I was saying you would see I've said this several times already. Do I need to go on?
CCP, holy hell we need new content this can't be the only thing to talk about. It doesn't even matter...but I do love to debate things with people. |
|
Laurent Cazaderon
Villore Sec Ops Gallente Federation
1247
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 11:43:00 -
[171] - Quote
Altina McAlterson wrote:It doesn't even matter...
^^ This ^^ |
Bleeding Antelope
SVER True Blood Unclaimed.
0
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 12:01:00 -
[172] - Quote
Could someone fill me in about this? I'm kind of lost in what we are losing in the next build that is causing this problem? |
Altina McAlterson
TRUE TEA BAGGERS
437
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 12:03:00 -
[173] - Quote
Bleeding Antelope wrote:Could someone fill me in about this? I'm kind of lost in what we are losing in the next build that is causing this problem? We're not losing anything, don't worry. If you're not already outraged about it best not to get involved. Although this discussion actually seems to be about whether or not the game is still in open BETA or if it is now in the Commercial Release stage of development. |
Bleeding Antelope
SVER True Blood Unclaimed.
0
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 12:15:00 -
[174] - Quote
Altina McAlterson wrote:Bleeding Antelope wrote:Could someone fill me in about this? I'm kind of lost in what we are losing in the next build that is causing this problem? We're not losing anything, don't worry. If you're not already outraged about it best not to get involved. Although this discussion actually seems to be about whether or not the game is still in open BETA or if it is now in the Commercial Release stage of development.
Okay, thank you for the reply back. |
Laheon
Osmon Surveillance Caldari State
301
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 12:19:00 -
[175] - Quote
LET THE THREAD DIE. Matter is being worked on. Actually, the original topic is solved. Thanks for coming. |
Salazar Skye-fire
Villore Sec Ops Gallente Federation
87
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 12:26:00 -
[176] - Quote
all i see is a bunch of crying from broke a** ppl, get a job, and if you got one get a 2nd. and if that dont work out hit up a truck stop with some mouthwash and a smile.
problem solved. |
Bendtner92
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
455
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 12:46:00 -
[177] - Quote
On a personal level I couldn't care less if I don't get the merc pack items/aurum back for commercial release, because that's not my problem with this situation.
Obviously CCP planned to have a full reset at commercial release, but then they changed plans to having the final reset with the move to TQ where the game was still in (closed/open) beta. Instead of openly coming out and saying plans were changed and merc pack items/aurum wouldn't be given back at commercial release they tried to ninja change the terms of the sale and be completely hush hush about it.
I'm sure CCP has lost credibility with this, and that can't be fully forgiven even if they decide to fully admit the situation at this point. |
Commercially Released
Sanmatar Kelkoons Minmatar Republic
5
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 13:51:00 -
[178] - Quote
It's so amusing how many people are insistent that the game judges fairness on the pay to win metric. |
|
GM Hercules
Game Masters C C P Alliance
372
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 15:14:00 -
[179] - Quote
CCP Eterne quotes below:
CCP Eterne wrote:We are not in Commercial Release. Any statements of such from a GM was inaccurate.
CCP Eterne wrote:I'm afraid I can't comment on any plans for an AUR refund at the present moment. I will look into getting a more definitive answer for you guys.
I don't see the point to continue this discussion. This thread is now locked.
GM Hercules Forum Community Moderator |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 :: [one page] |