Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 :: [one page] |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
843-BANE
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
342
|
Posted - 2014.01.21 21:43:00 -
[1] - Quote
Now that I've got your attention, please click on this thread if you are reading this on the minimized preview bubble.
For whatever CCP Dev may have chanced upon this thread, no, there is no quote. I just did that because I know you're hot on any threads that may misquote you guys. However I DO strongly believe this needs to be addressed.
Anyway,
Corp battles. Would it be so hard to bring them back, seriously? I'm talking old school contract battles.
Why bring them back?
- Two teams who CHOOSE to fight eachother - Two teams that can fight WHEN they want to fight - Two teams that can specify rules and ISK loss/gain - No political/meta stigma - A chance for newer corps to integrate
In the current climate, CCP, how can you possibly expect younger corporations or specialised corporations to compete on their own terms? Not only will it cost them 36 million ISK to start a weak attack (Chump change for you and me, riches for some) but they have so many factors that limit their targets such as the forced time frames, people locking districts, and skill level itself. With PC there is ONE way for newer corporations to gain competitive experience, and that is through Planet Fight Club.
Don't get me wrong, PFC is fantastic however there are only so many districts, only so many corporations that can participate and it just isn't fair on many players. PC just isn't an option for so many corporations out there, and I feel awful for them.
Corp battles allow teams (both new and old) to organise battles of whatever magnitude they may like on their own terms. I would suggest some limitations be put in place however to prevent forms of boosting or cheating:
- No affect on statistics such as K/D. W/L or any leaderboard stats - No ISK gain OTHER than the contract issued. - No SP gain (perhaps 1000 SP Max if it seems unfair, as if they had capped)
I honestly cannot fathom why this cannot be implemented. It is not new tech, it is not untested, we USED to have this and it was fantastic.
It meant corporations could say this: "Hey, you guys want to have a fight? Maybe get some new strategies down?" "Yeah sounds great" "Awesome, be ready in 5 mins"
At the moment corps have to do this: "Hey, you guys want to have a fight? Maybe get some new strategies down?" "Yeah sounds great" "Ok, in 1 day and 14 hours when you may or may not be available, we will be attacking this corporation. However it's costing us 36 million so you damn well better be there".
So please, CCP. Reply to this. Give the corporations out there not ready for PC some sort of hope. Hell, it'd be good for EVERY corporation anyway! Fights as and when you want, friendlies, fun matches, etc. Imagine how much easier thunderdome would be! You know that thing you made a Dev post about? Imagine how much easier it would be for Judge Radamanthus to test out Dropships and teach the community! Imagine how much easier it would be to have xXGhazbaranXx show us some awesome trick shots.
Opening corp battles opens up a huge potential for change and progression in Dust, and I think we need to address this NOW. None of this 'Road map' stuff, I believe I'm not the only one who'll want an answer.
In addition, I've started a Petition to make the numbers of signers a little more evident. https://www.change.org/petitions/ccp-add-corp-battles-back-to-dust
I don't know how useful or easy it is to sign with that site, I'm hoping it will be a visual representation to CCP of how crucial this is.
Thank you. I expect the usual trolling/QQ/Whatever but I will continue to bump this until I receive a productive response from CCP.
Director // Ranking Officer // BurgezzE.T.F
Patron of War | GPæGPìGPî
|
Darken-Soul
Tal-Romon Legion Amarr Empire
53
|
Posted - 2014.01.21 21:45:00 -
[2] - Quote
Everyone wants this except CCP. why not?
I am the real Darken
|
843-BANE
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
351
|
Posted - 2014.01.21 21:54:00 -
[3] - Quote
Darken-Soul wrote:Everyone wants this except CCP. why not?
Exactly. I don't know.
Bumping for visibility.
Director // Ranking Officer // [BurgezzE.T.F][1]
Patron of War | GPæGPìGPî
[BRING BACK CORP BATTLES, SIGN HERE][1]
[1
|
Killar-12
The Corporate Raiders Top Men.
2040
|
Posted - 2014.01.21 21:54:00 -
[4] - Quote
Darken-Soul wrote:Everyone wants this except CCP. why not? Because Corp battles will hurt PC if not kill it outright because PC is a horrible Idea that either needs removed or radically reworked requiring activity or action to make ISK but they need returned... badly
A-Teams win Battles B-Teams win Campaigns C-Teams win Wars
|
Ghost Kaisar
Titans of Phoenix Legacy Rising
2162
|
Posted - 2014.01.21 21:55:00 -
[5] - Quote
/signed
Nothing says "F**K YOU!" like a direct Flaylock to the face.
Minmatar. In Rust we trust.
|
1st Lieutenant Tiberius
0uter.Heaven Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
893
|
Posted - 2014.01.21 22:01:00 -
[6] - Quote
+1 Bump
The Sinwarden
|
Bojo The Mighty
L.O.T.I.S.
2854
|
Posted - 2014.01.21 22:02:00 -
[7] - Quote
Yep, corp battles were where it's at.
Check out latest BSOTT Guide
|
Darken-Soul
Tal-Romon Legion Amarr Empire
54
|
Posted - 2014.01.21 22:08:00 -
[8] - Quote
Killar-12 wrote:Darken-Soul wrote:Everyone wants this except CCP. why not? Because Corp battles will hurt PC if not kill it outright because PC is a horrible Idea that either needs removed or radically reworked requiring activity or action to make ISK but they need returned... badly
PC is the reward you get for starting this game in open beta. Its an ISK farm for the mercs who "helped" CCP refine it.
I am the real Darken
|
Ripcord19981
KNIGHTZ OF THE ROUND Legacy Rising
348
|
Posted - 2014.01.21 22:08:00 -
[9] - Quote
buuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppp
I can only please one person per day. Today is not ur day, tomorrow doesn't look too bright either.
Turkey sammich>taco
|
843-BANE
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
358
|
Posted - 2014.01.21 22:10:00 -
[10] - Quote
Apparently the petition link is a bit glitchy, getting some error pages some people say so we'll bear that in mind. Thanks for the support so far, let's keep this thread at the top of GD!
BRING BACK CORP BATTLES
SIGN THE PEITION HERE
|
|
GVGMODE
WorstPlayersEver
111
|
Posted - 2014.01.21 22:10:00 -
[11] - Quote
It made community run tournaments possible and helped players with no experience train...
+1 |
Heimdallr69
Ancient Exiles. Renegade Alliance
1427
|
Posted - 2014.01.21 22:10:00 -
[12] - Quote
8v8 or 16v16? That'd be a good training place for new recruits to get them PC ready or a place where you can fight your allies without flipping districts and no hard feelings. Also a lot of new corps fall apart after losing their first PC when they have to grind all that isk for only 150 clones.. This will help retain players and corps from leaving. Anime is the best, that is all.
Removed inappropriate content - CCP Logibro
|
Arkena Wyrnspire
Fatal Absolution Covert Intervention
8187
|
Posted - 2014.01.21 22:11:00 -
[13] - Quote
Yes, yes, yes, and also yes. Also, yes yes and yes.
Level 8 Forum Warrior
Lenin of the glorious armoured revolution
|
Lea Silencio
0uter.Heaven Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
1083
|
Posted - 2014.01.21 22:11:00 -
[14] - Quote
/signed
and +1.
PurificationGäó
It's what I do.
Amarr Victor
|
843-BANE
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
362
|
Posted - 2014.01.21 22:22:00 -
[15] - Quote
Bumping again for visibility. I'll continue to bump this until something is done.
Thanks everyone so far, I believe this is a very real goal that we can achieve together.
BRING BACK CORP BATTLES
SIGN THE PEITION HERE
|
XEROO COOL
Fatal Absolution Covert Intervention
379
|
Posted - 2014.01.21 22:27:00 -
[16] - Quote
+1
Everyone has a plan until you punch em in the face!
(Gò»°Gûí°n+ëGò»n+¦ Gö+GöüGö+
Xeroo.Cool on Skype.
|
Mortedeamor
1273
|
Posted - 2014.01.21 22:29:00 -
[17] - Quote
me and a buddy were just talking about how much it would help dust and the newer corp's to have cb as an outlet over pc..+1 from me
jihhhaders = av lvl 0
swarm master = av lvl 99+
|
John Mocahn
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
335
|
Posted - 2014.01.21 22:32:00 -
[18] - Quote
bump
843 Recruitment Officer
Proto Heavy // Prof.5 HMG // Prof. 4 Forge
BurgezzE.T.F
|
Fenix Alexarr
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
65
|
Posted - 2014.01.21 22:34:00 -
[19] - Quote
CCP wants an ISK sink. This is brilliant. +1 and petition signed. |
843-BANE
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
370
|
Posted - 2014.01.21 22:37:00 -
[20] - Quote
Fenix Alexarr wrote:CCP wants an ISK sink. This is brilliant. +1 and petition signed.
Thank you my old friend <3
BRING BACK CORP BATTLES
SIGN THE PEITION HERE
|
|
Heimdallr69
Ancient Exiles. Renegade Alliance
1428
|
Posted - 2014.01.21 22:37:00 -
[21] - Quote
Almost forgot/ signed
Removed inappropriate content - CCP Logibro
|
Dunkel Hoffnung Mk3
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
0
|
Posted - 2014.01.21 22:38:00 -
[22] - Quote
Signed and Bump
"I BEAT YOU TO DEATH WITH A SCANNER" - Nerfnut
|
Gavr1lo Pr1nc1p
TRA1LBLAZERS
109
|
Posted - 2014.01.21 22:38:00 -
[23] - Quote
A cool thing would be that both teams put down ISK for the match and it went into a jackpot, and the winning team got an adjustable percentage of the pot (set by the defender, with a minimum of 55%), and the other team got the remainder. It'd be pretty damn cool.
EDIT: oops, almost forgot /signed
Yes, I did kill Archduke Ferdinand. I used my nova knives.
https://dust514.com/recruit/k3vMnb/
|
Fenix Alexarr
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
70
|
Posted - 2014.01.21 22:39:00 -
[24] - Quote
843-BANE wrote:Fenix Alexarr wrote:CCP wants an ISK sink. This is brilliant. +1 and petition signed. Thank you my old friend <3
There's more work to be done here with quality of life for current and future players, but as far as encouraging better, more organized players to leave the pub matches alone, this is a huge step in the right direction.
|
Arkena Wyrnspire
Fatal Absolution Covert Intervention
8191
|
Posted - 2014.01.21 22:43:00 -
[25] - Quote
Why are so many people saying +1 when the OP has so few likes? PLUS ONE MORE!
Level 8 Forum Warrior
Lenin of the glorious armoured revolution
|
843-BANE
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
384
|
Posted - 2014.01.21 22:49:00 -
[26] - Quote
Arkena Wyrnspire wrote:Why are so many people saying +1 when the OP has so few likes? PLUS ONE MORE!
Haha whether it be through replies, OP likes or petition signs I just want to get this damned message across to CCP.
BRING BACK CORP BATTLES
SIGN THE PEITION HERE
|
Garrett Blacknova
Codex Troopers
4359
|
Posted - 2014.01.21 22:58:00 -
[27] - Quote
+1 to OP.
Great idea.
I'll sign the change.org petition as soon as there's a blue bar confirming that CCP are looking there as well as here. I know they check the forums, I don't know they check change.org |
Darken-Soul
Tal-Romon Legion Amarr Empire
65
|
Posted - 2014.01.21 22:59:00 -
[28] - Quote
bump
I am the real Darken
|
843-BANE
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
387
|
Posted - 2014.01.21 23:00:00 -
[29] - Quote
Bump.
Let's keep this going boys and girls. If we can make this change by coming together collectively and not tearing eachothers throats out CCP may just listen to us more in the future. Response so far has been amazing. We, the community, need this.
BRING BACK CORP BATTLES
SIGN THE PEITION HERE
|
Denchlad 7
Freek Coalition Freek Alliance
62
|
Posted - 2014.01.21 23:02:00 -
[30] - Quote
/signed.
This would make the game far more enticing for me and many others.
If you can't accept change, you will fail in this world.
|
|
843-BANE
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
387
|
Posted - 2014.01.21 23:08:00 -
[31] - Quote
Bumping again.
BRING BACK CORP BATTLES
SIGN THE PEITION HERE
|
Leadfoot10
Molon Labe. Public Disorder.
249
|
Posted - 2014.01.21 23:09:00 -
[32] - Quote
This is a superb idea and (FWIW) I endorse it fully....Leadfoot |
Ku Shala
Onuoto Uakan Huogaatsu
776
|
Posted - 2014.01.21 23:10:00 -
[33] - Quote
+1 signed
Onuoto Uakan Huogaatsu Apply today!
For the State
Caldari Loyalist
|
Darken-Soul
Tal-Romon Legion Amarr Empire
67
|
Posted - 2014.01.21 23:12:00 -
[34] - Quote
843-BANE wrote:Bump.
Let's keep this going boys and girls. If we can make this change by coming together collectively and not tearing eachothers throats out CCP may just listen to us more in the future. Response so far has been amazing. We, the community, need this.
I have never heard of anyone opposing the idea of corp battles. Its the one thing CCP got right.....Then got rid of in favor of the current mess that is PC.
I am the real Darken
|
843-BANE
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
388
|
Posted - 2014.01.21 23:18:00 -
[35] - Quote
Bumping once more. Will not stop until we are heard.
BRING BACK CORP BATTLES
SIGN THE PEITION HERE
|
Solomon Malcolm
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
57
|
Posted - 2014.01.21 23:19:00 -
[36] - Quote
I support this too.
"This is hotter than morgan freeman and chuck norris oil wrestling while wrapped in bacon"
"You Have Been ScannedCCP"
|
Roy Ventus
Foxhound Corporation General Tso's Alliance
943
|
Posted - 2014.01.21 23:22:00 -
[37] - Quote
I VOLUNTEER AS TRIBUT-
I MEAN I SUPPORT.
"There once was a time when there wasn't a Roy Ventus and it wasn't much of a time at all."
|
Rusty Shallows
857
|
Posted - 2014.01.21 23:26:00 -
[38] - Quote
Killar-12 wrote:tl;drDarken-Soul wrote:Everyone wants Corp Battles except CCP. why not? Because Corp battles will hurt PC if not kill it outright because PC is a horrible Idea that either needs removed or radically reworked requiring activity or action to make ISK but they need returned... badly Fixed! Just move that to the bottom of the post minus my bit here and it's's good to go.
Here, have some candy and a Like. :-)
Forums > Game
|
Draxus Prime
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
2589
|
Posted - 2014.01.21 23:29:00 -
[39] - Quote
/signed
"Imagine a world where hypothetical thoughts didn't exist" -Draxus Prime
Closed Beta Vet
Nova Knife Proficeiney 5 \o/
|
843-BANE
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
397
|
Posted - 2014.01.21 23:30:00 -
[40] - Quote
Draxus Prime wrote:/signed
Thanks Drax, please use your forum warrior ways and help me get this out there! <3
BRING BACK CORP BATTLES
SIGN THE PEITION HERE
|
|
843-BANE
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
397
|
Posted - 2014.01.21 23:33:00 -
[41] - Quote
Bumping.
BRING BACK CORP BATTLES
SIGN THE PEITION HERE
|
843-Vika
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
5
|
Posted - 2014.01.21 23:36:00 -
[42] - Quote
lets bump it up and bring back corp battles |
Draxus Prime
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
2589
|
Posted - 2014.01.21 23:37:00 -
[43] - Quote
this would make training matches/tournaments a lot easier
"Imagine a world where hypothetical thoughts didn't exist" -Draxus Prime
Closed Beta Vet
Nova Knife Proficeiney 5 \o/
|
Draxus Prime
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
2589
|
Posted - 2014.01.21 23:38:00 -
[44] - Quote
843-Vika wrote:lets bump it up and bring back corp battles VIKA!!!! where have you been?
"Imagine a world where hypothetical thoughts didn't exist" -Draxus Prime
Closed Beta Vet
Nova Knife Proficeiney 5 \o/
|
CRYPT3C W0LF
Eyniletti Rangers Minmatar Republic
241
|
Posted - 2014.01.21 23:38:00 -
[45] - Quote
bump
/signed
You're Friendly Scout Youtuber, A Merc With a Passion! :)
|
Marad''er
Ancient Exiles. Renegade Alliance
482
|
Posted - 2014.01.21 23:43:00 -
[46] - Quote
WE DESPERATELY NEED THIS CCP!
GôÉGô¥GôÿGô£Gôö > GôÉGô¢Gô¢
Gÿà¿When will dust get better?Gÿà
Forum Warrior LV. 4 | pâÅpéñpâápü»tºüpü«µëôµÆâpéÆF¦ápüúpüªpüäpéï | PSN: I-NINJA-ALL-DAY
|
843-BANE
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
403
|
Posted - 2014.01.21 23:47:00 -
[47] - Quote
Marad''er wrote:WE DESPERATELY NEED THIS CCP!
Hell yeah we do. Thanks man.
BRING BACK CORP BATTLES
SIGN THE PEITION HERE
|
843-BANE
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
403
|
Posted - 2014.01.21 23:52:00 -
[48] - Quote
Bumping again.
BRING BACK CORP BATTLES
SIGN THE PEITION HERE
|
Atiim
Living Like Larry Schwag
3772
|
Posted - 2014.01.21 23:59:00 -
[49] - Quote
GûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûäGûäGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæ GûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûêGûæGûæGûêGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæ GûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûêGûæGûæGûêGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæ GûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûêGûæGûæGûæGûêGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæ GûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûêGûæGûæGûæGûæGûêGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæ GûêGûêGûêGûêGûêGûêGûäGûäGûêGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûêGûêGûêGûêGûêGûêGûäGûæGûæGûæ GûôGûôGûôGûôGûôGûôGûêGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûêGûæGûæ GûôGûôGûôGûôGûôGûôGûêGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûêGûæGûæ GûôGûôGûôGûôGûôGûôGûêGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûêGûæGûæ GûôGûôGûôGûôGûôGûôGûêGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûêGûæGûæ GûôGûôGûôGûôGûôGûôGûêGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûêGûæGûæ GûôGûôGûôGûôGûôGûôGûêGûêGûêGûêGûêGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûêGûêGûæGûæ GûêGûêGûêGûêGûêGûÇGûæGûæGûæGûæGûÇGûÇGûêGûêGûêGûêGûêGûêGûêGûêGûæGûæGûæGûæ
Next On To-Do List:
Particle Cannons
|
BAMM HAVOC
Carbon 7 CRONOS.
189
|
Posted - 2014.01.22 00:01:00 -
[50] - Quote
corp battles during the beta is where I cut my teeth.... this is a great idea + 1
Support The DUST514 TREEEEEEESSS
|
|
TechMechMeds
Swamp Tempo Canis Eliminatus Operatives
2279
|
Posted - 2014.01.22 00:02:00 -
[51] - Quote
Signed all the way.
Level 2 forum warrior.
Swamp iz on dat welevant flex fam
I sold my family to the Amarr for isk, its a valid tactic
|
Fizzer94
L.O.T.I.S. D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E
1488
|
Posted - 2014.01.22 00:03:00 -
[52] - Quote
I miss corp battles. I don't like the drama of PC.
Yours Truly,
Reginald Fizzer94 Delafontaine III, Esquire
|
TheD1CK
Dead Man's Game
431
|
Posted - 2014.01.22 00:05:00 -
[53] - Quote
o7
Minmatar Demolitions Specialist
Plasma Cannon Pro
|
843-BANE
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
409
|
Posted - 2014.01.22 00:07:00 -
[54] - Quote
Bumping before I go to bed.
I implore everyone to keep this thread alive, this is not all I will be doing to get this done.
I appreciate support, and it's amazing that everyone is in 100% undeniable agreement on something. Keep bumping guys.
BRING BACK CORP BATTLES
SIGN THE PEITION HERE
|
8213
0uter.Heaven Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
1427
|
Posted - 2014.01.22 00:11:00 -
[55] - Quote
Brilliant. No at Corps are PC A-team super elite, super funded...
This will add more dynamic to the game that benefits everyone.
Fish in a bucket!
|
XxDuneRayxX
Legacy Rising
24
|
Posted - 2014.01.22 00:26:00 -
[56] - Quote
Killar-12 wrote:Darken-Soul wrote:Everyone wants this except CCP. why not? Because Corp battles will hurt PC if not kill it outright because PC is a horrible Idea that either needs removed or radically reworked requiring activity or action to make ISK but they need returned... badly Its not an horrible idea but putting back corp battles would be a good thing to do. |
Jenova Rhapsodos
Fatal Absolution Covert Intervention
108
|
Posted - 2014.01.22 00:39:00 -
[57] - Quote
Signed |
Grit Breather
Cannonfodder PMC
983
|
Posted - 2014.01.22 00:46:00 -
[58] - Quote
Ok, bring them back.
"Why, sometimes I've believed as many as six impossible things before breakfast."
GÇò Lewis Carroll, Alice in Wonderland
|
Henchmen21
Planet Express LLC
449
|
Posted - 2014.01.22 00:48:00 -
[59] - Quote
Signed, even though I am the only one in my corp and thus have no use for it. It would give the pubstompers something better then do then well pubstomp.
Henchmen21: Infantry
Gotyougood Ufkr: Vehicles
|
Thor Odinson42
Molon Labe. Public Disorder.
2542
|
Posted - 2014.01.22 00:50:00 -
[60] - Quote
Signed
ML Director
Eve Toon - Raylan Scott
|
|
John Mocahn
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
338
|
Posted - 2014.01.22 01:03:00 -
[61] - Quote
I remember my first Corp Battle was against the Imperfects. Thanks 843! lmao
BUMP
843 Recruitment Officer
Proto Heavy // Prof.5 HMG // Prof. 4 Forge
BurgezzE.T.F
|
Incin3rate
Storm Wind Strikeforce Caldari State
9
|
Posted - 2014.01.22 01:36:00 -
[62] - Quote
Signed. |
MoonEagle A
Subsonic Synthesis RISE of LEGION
97
|
Posted - 2014.01.22 01:48:00 -
[63] - Quote
Signed! |
Patrick57
Fatal Absolution Covert Intervention
4130
|
Posted - 2014.01.22 02:08:00 -
[64] - Quote
+1 but I can't sign the actual petition.
Winner of at least 9 King ThunderBolt hate videos :D
|
Trenix Keltron
Onuoto Uakan Huogaatsu
25
|
Posted - 2014.01.22 02:17:00 -
[65] - Quote
Would be nice
OUKH corporation recruitment active. Initiate enlistment protocols. The future is now
|
Lynn Beck
Granite Mercenary Division Top Men.
563
|
Posted - 2014.01.22 02:18:00 -
[66] - Quote
I do believe my entire corp woul agree with this.
Under 28db
Officially nerfproof (predicting CR nerf February '14)
I have a God, His name is Dakka.
|
ENDURO ETC
703rd
4
|
Posted - 2014.01.22 02:35:00 -
[67] - Quote
Going to tell my corp about this. +1 BUMB
Love, Hate, and everything in between.
|
KenKaniff69
Fatal Absolution Covert Intervention
1927
|
Posted - 2014.01.22 02:48:00 -
[68] - Quote
ABSO-FUUCKING-LUTELY!
So about those vehicle locks...
|
Marad''er
Ancient Exiles. Renegade Alliance
485
|
Posted - 2014.01.22 03:31:00 -
[69] - Quote
Bump
GôÉGô¥GôÿGô£Gôö > GôÉGô¢Gô¢
Gÿà¿When will dust get better?Gÿà
Forum Warrior LV. 4 | pâÅpéñpâápü»tºüpü«µëôµÆâpéÆF¦ápüúpüªpüäpéï | PSN: I-NINJA-ALL-DAY
|
deepfried salad gilliam
Sanguine Knights
386
|
Posted - 2014.01.22 03:40:00 -
[70] - Quote
yes support completely
Proud Christian
one of the most essential parts of eve is left out of dust: freedom, exploration, open-world gameplay.
|
|
Draco Cerberus
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
715
|
Posted - 2014.01.22 04:22:00 -
[71] - Quote
+1
LogiGod earns his pips
|
8213
0uter.Heaven Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
1434
|
Posted - 2014.01.22 05:14:00 -
[72] - Quote
8UMP
Fish in a bucket!
|
Lonewolf Heavy
ROGUE SPADES
43
|
Posted - 2014.01.22 05:21:00 -
[73] - Quote
I support, I miss being able to have grudge matches with corps and also even with my own corp mates. Plus the thunder dome would be much easier to participate in
Blueberries are delicious and an essential part of my diet ;)
Commando/Heavy
Willing to PC for anyone for a low price
|
Vanell Sin
Dust2Dust. Top Men.
40
|
Posted - 2014.01.22 06:53:00 -
[74] - Quote
buumpp
Im playing since Uprising 1.0 and still have 8m SP.Im I doing something wrong?
|
Arkena Wyrnspire
Fatal Absolution Covert Intervention
8207
|
Posted - 2014.01.22 07:01:00 -
[75] - Quote
+45. You see CCP? YOU SEE?
Level 8 Forum Warrior
Lenin of the glorious armoured revolution
|
843-BANE
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
433
|
Posted - 2014.01.22 08:01:00 -
[76] - Quote
BUMP
BRING BACK CORP BATTLES
SIGN THE PEITION HERE
|
Timothy Reaper
WASTELAND JUNK REMOVAL Top Men.
779
|
Posted - 2014.01.22 08:08:00 -
[77] - Quote
+1 and signed. If you're concerned about the security of the petition site, just put your Dust name and fake information for the rest. I told them I live in Antartica and my email is [email protected]
Never argue with stupid people, they will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience.
Mark Twain
|
Spectral Clone
Dust2Dust. Top Men.
1072
|
Posted - 2014.01.22 08:09:00 -
[78] - Quote
Signed. |
Marad''er
Ancient Exiles. Renegade Alliance
500
|
Posted - 2014.01.22 08:13:00 -
[79] - Quote
Timothy Reaper wrote:+1 and signed. If you're concerned about the security of the petition site, just put your Dust name and fake information for the rest. I told them I live in Antartica and my email is [email protected]Edit: That actually made a link? lol. I said I was from "Random" and my zip code was 80085
GôÉGô¥GôÿGô£Gôö > GôÉGô¢Gô¢
Gÿà¿When will dust get better?Gÿà
Forum Warrior LV. 4 | pâÅpéñpâápü»tºüpü«µëôµÆâpéÆF¦ápüúpüªpüäpéï | PSN: I-NINJA-ALL-DAY
|
843-BANE
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
433
|
Posted - 2014.01.22 08:51:00 -
[80] - Quote
CCP Have seen this people, it's been moved to Feedback/requests.
Where is your response CCP???
BRING BACK CORP BATTLES
SIGN THE PEITION HERE
|
|
843-BANE
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
436
|
Posted - 2014.01.22 08:58:00 -
[81] - Quote
John Mocahn wrote:I remember my first Corp Battle was against the Imperfects. Thanks 843! lmao
BUMP
My first was against Pink Fluffy bunnies O_o
Also thanks 843!
BRING BACK CORP BATTLES
SIGN THE PEITION HERE
|
843-BANE
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
436
|
Posted - 2014.01.22 10:17:00 -
[82] - Quote
Bringing this right back up to the top!
BRING BACK CORP BATTLES
SIGN THE PEITION HERE
|
843-BANE
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
437
|
Posted - 2014.01.22 12:53:00 -
[83] - Quote
Bump. You hear us CCP?
BRING BACK CORP BATTLES
SIGN THE PEITION HERE
|
Sergamon Draco
Rautaleijona Top Men.
253
|
Posted - 2014.01.22 14:02:00 -
[84] - Quote
Yes bring them back,give new players allso change experience that
Fck the kdr,i`m going in
|
DJINN Jecture
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
101
|
Posted - 2014.01.22 14:07:00 -
[85] - Quote
+1
Agent For Hire
|
Hyborean Strain
Immortal Guides
39
|
Posted - 2014.01.22 14:14:00 -
[86] - Quote
+1 |
NAV HIV
The Generals General Tso's Alliance
832
|
Posted - 2014.01.22 14:21:00 -
[87] - Quote
Bump +1
Please bring it back. |
ReGnYuM
Escrow Removal and Acquisition
1936
|
Posted - 2014.01.22 14:37:00 -
[88] - Quote
bump +!
Official Imperfect Title: Supreme Leader of the Endless Sunset
I Slay, for thy Empress
Do you even PC... Brah
|
843-BANE
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
442
|
Posted - 2014.01.22 15:12:00 -
[89] - Quote
Bump
BRING BACK CORP BATTLES
SIGN THE PEITION HERE
|
843-BANE
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
444
|
Posted - 2014.01.22 16:19:00 -
[90] - Quote
Bump.
NB: CCP HAVE SEEN THIS. They've moved this post to Feedback/requests yet refuse to comment on it. CCP, where are you?
BRING BACK CORP BATTLES
SIGN THE PEITION HERE
|
|
Levithunder
150
|
Posted - 2014.01.22 17:27:00 -
[91] - Quote
CCP you have two choices:
-bring back corp battles
Or
-fix PC to we're its like 5,000,000 isk for a clone pack and a district only generates 1,000,000isk daily Make it so bigger corps are like "hey we don't constantly wan't to defend all these districs because its not worth alot " So people "share" and if the income daily was reduced by 90% it would stil be high stakes battles if you loose you don't get anything:)
**everyday you wait ccp the more money you let flow into dust and eventally all that money will break the game** PS WE ARE TALKING HUNDREDS OF BILLIONS NOT MILLIONS!
(-í° -£-û -í°) against my adversaries.
|
843-BANE
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
444
|
Posted - 2014.01.22 17:42:00 -
[92] - Quote
Bring back corp battles!
BRING BACK CORP BATTLES
SIGN THE PEITION HERE
|
Nothing Certain
Villore Sec Ops Gallente Federation
57
|
Posted - 2014.01.22 17:58:00 -
[93] - Quote
Levithunder wrote:CCP you have two choices:
-bring back corp battles
Or
-fix PC to we're its like 5,000,000 isk for a clone pack and a district only generates 1,000,000isk daily Make it so bigger corps are like "hey we don't constantly wan't to defend all these districs because its not worth alot " So people "share" and if the income daily was reduced by 90% it would stil be high stakes battles if you loose you don't get anything:)
**everyday you wait ccp the more money you let flow into dust and eventally all that money will break the game** PS WE ARE TALKING HUNDREDS OF BILLIONS NOT MILLIONS!
CCP learned economics from Zimbabwe, we have hyperinflation and perverse incentives. I like the idea of corp battles, bring them back.
Oh, and END THE FED |
843-BANE
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
445
|
Posted - 2014.01.22 18:07:00 -
[94] - Quote
So far 100% of everyone has agreed. What is your take, CCP?
BRING BACK CORP BATTLES
SIGN THE PEITION HERE
|
calisk galern
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
1666
|
Posted - 2014.01.22 18:11:00 -
[95] - Quote
ya considering the current state of pc ( 50% of districts on nyain jap timers set right before down time so they can't be re-attacked ).
i'm thinking we just bring corp battles back, let pc be the wash that it is, and let's move on. |
843-BANE
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
446
|
Posted - 2014.01.22 18:15:00 -
[96] - Quote
calisk galern wrote:ya considering the current state of pc ( 50% of districts on nyain jap timers set right before down time so they can't be re-attacked ).
i'm thinking we just bring corp battles back, let pc be the wash that it is, and let's move on.
Exactly.
BRING BACK CORP BATTLES
SIGN THE PEITION HERE
|
843-BANE
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
447
|
Posted - 2014.01.22 18:52:00 -
[97] - Quote
BUMP.
BRING BACK CORP BATTLES
SIGN THE PEITION HERE
|
Birra Abbadon
The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar DARKSTAR ARMY
2
|
Posted - 2014.01.22 19:13:00 -
[98] - Quote
definetly /signed |
843-BANE
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
448
|
Posted - 2014.01.22 19:44:00 -
[99] - Quote
Birra Abbadon wrote:definetly /signed
Thank you, bump!
BRING BACK CORP BATTLES
SIGN THE PEITION HERE
|
TXSTORO
Defenders of the Helghast Dream
10
|
Posted - 2014.01.22 20:09:00 -
[100] - Quote
As a smaller independent Corp, We approve of this message.
--Adapt or Die--
Jack of All Trades
Apply to "Defenders of the Helghast Dream"
|
|
Squagga
The State Protectorate
34
|
Posted - 2014.01.22 20:15:00 -
[101] - Quote
I want in on this. I also want one on one matches. I also want skirmish 1.0 while we're asking for old things
Reloading, the silent killer.
|
843-BANE
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
449
|
Posted - 2014.01.22 20:16:00 -
[102] - Quote
Squagga wrote:I want in on this. I also want one on one matches. I also want skirmish 1.0 while we're asking for old things
Omg Squagga O_O
What's up dude, long time no see, geez!
BRING BACK CORP BATTLES
SIGN THE PEITION HERE
|
Gelhad Thremyr
Quebec United The CORVOS
13
|
Posted - 2014.01.22 20:29:00 -
[103] - Quote
bump ! |
843-BANE
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
453
|
Posted - 2014.01.22 20:31:00 -
[104] - Quote
Bump once more!
BRING BACK CORP BATTLES
SIGN THE PEITION HERE
|
843-BANE
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
453
|
Posted - 2014.01.22 20:38:00 -
[105] - Quote
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAND again.
BRING BACK CORP BATTLES
SIGN THE PEITION HERE
|
Killar-12
The Corporate Raiders Top Men.
2053
|
Posted - 2014.01.22 20:39:00 -
[106] - Quote
Here here for CB's!
A-Teams win Battles B-Teams win Campaigns C-Teams win Wars
|
CYRAX SERVIUS
Death Firm. Canis Eliminatus Operatives
574
|
Posted - 2014.01.22 20:46:00 -
[107] - Quote
Semper Fi!!!!
CEO
Invictus Maneo~ "I remain unvanquished"
|
Squagga
The State Protectorate
38
|
Posted - 2014.01.22 20:49:00 -
[108] - Quote
843-BANE wrote:Squagga wrote:I want in on this. I also want one on one matches. I also want skirmish 1.0 while we're asking for old things Omg Squagga O_O What's up dude, long time no see, geez!
Hey good seein ya bro! I heard they had Caldari weapons and I just had ta come represent!
Reloading, the silent killer.
|
Hobo on Fire
Goonfeet Special Planetary Emergency Response Group
110
|
Posted - 2014.01.22 20:53:00 -
[109] - Quote
+1
I've wanted these back for a while, if for nothing more than to organize a training ground for new players or test out weapons. |
Squagga
The State Protectorate
38
|
Posted - 2014.01.22 20:58:00 -
[110] - Quote
Hobo on Fire wrote:+1
I've wanted these back for a while, if for nothing more than to organize a training ground for new players or test out weapons. The new weapons are great. I think that more time could have been better spend on expanding the game in other areas, but yeah I love my rail rifle and am very excited about the two new Caldari pistol and sub machine gun. I am gonna be one cold lookkin mofo takin out people execution style with my Bolt pistol. Gem Cutter is back too! He said he saw Wheels last night
Reloading, the silent killer.
|
|
Jebus McKing
Molon Labe. Public Disorder.
271
|
Posted - 2014.01.22 21:02:00 -
[111] - Quote
/signed
@JebusMcKing // Rifle stats comparison spreadsheet.
ò_Ô
|
Marad''er
Ancient Exiles. Renegade Alliance
521
|
Posted - 2014.01.22 21:03:00 -
[112] - Quote
Back to the top
GôÉGô¥GôÿGô£Gôö > GôÉGô¢Gô¢
Gÿà¿When will dust get better?Gÿà
Forum Warrior LV. 4 | pâÅpéñpâápü»tºüpü«µëôµÆâpéÆF¦ápüúpüªpüäpéï | PSN: I-NINJA-ALL-DAY
|
843-BANE
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
455
|
Posted - 2014.01.22 21:03:00 -
[113] - Quote
Marad''er wrote:Back to the top
Need to talk to you in game when you're next on
BRING BACK CORP BATTLES
SIGN THE PEITION HERE
|
Marad''er
Ancient Exiles. Renegade Alliance
521
|
Posted - 2014.01.22 21:06:00 -
[114] - Quote
843-BANE wrote:Marad''er wrote:Back to the top Need to talk to you in game when you're next on Why?
GôÉGô¥GôÿGô£Gôö > GôÉGô¢Gô¢
Gÿà¿When will dust get better?Gÿà
Forum Warrior LV. 4 | pâÅpéñpâápü»tºüpü«µëôµÆâpéÆF¦ápüúpüªpüäpéï | PSN: I-NINJA-ALL-DAY
|
843-BANE
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
455
|
Posted - 2014.01.22 21:07:00 -
[115] - Quote
Marad''er wrote:843-BANE wrote:Marad''er wrote:Back to the top Need to talk to you in game when you're next on Why?
Favour to ask :D
BRING BACK CORP BATTLES
SIGN THE PEITION HERE
|
BIind Shot
Capital Acquisitions LLC Public Disorder.
68
|
Posted - 2014.01.22 21:09:00 -
[116] - Quote
My name's Blind Shot and I approve this message. +1 |
Marad''er
Ancient Exiles. Renegade Alliance
521
|
Posted - 2014.01.22 21:09:00 -
[117] - Quote
843-BANE wrote:Marad''er wrote:843-BANE wrote:Marad''er wrote:Back to the top Need to talk to you in game when you're next on Why? Favour to ask :D Want me to ring?
That's all I can do. If you want directors though you gotta talk to zaria, mj, or doc
GôÉGô¥GôÿGô£Gôö > GôÉGô¢Gô¢
Gÿà¿When will dust get better?Gÿà
Forum Warrior LV. 4 | pâÅpéñpâápü»tºüpü«µëôµÆâpéÆF¦ápüúpüªpüäpéï | PSN: I-NINJA-ALL-DAY
|
843-BANE
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
456
|
Posted - 2014.01.22 21:09:00 -
[118] - Quote
Marad''er wrote:843-BANE wrote:Marad''er wrote:843-BANE wrote:Marad''er wrote:Back to the top Need to talk to you in game when you're next on Why? Favour to ask :D Want me to ring? That's all I can do. If you want directors though you gotta talk to zaria, mj, or doc
No no, there's no rush. I'll see ya when I see ya.
BRING BACK CORP BATTLES
SIGN THE PEITION HERE
|
Killar-12
The Corporate Raiders Top Men.
2053
|
Posted - 2014.01.22 21:14:00 -
[119] - Quote
Marad''er wrote:843-BANE wrote:Marad''er wrote:843-BANE wrote:Marad''er wrote:Back to the top Need to talk to you in game when you're next on Why? Favour to ask :D Want me to ring? That's all I can do. If you want directors though you gotta talk to zaria, mj, or doc Hmm I've got a favor but I'll get Zaria and Get Ramp as I need something that AE (well Renegade in general...) has... in exchange for something we have.. not what you'd expect same deal with 843 and the other PD corps
A-Teams win Battles B-Teams win Campaigns C-Teams win Wars
|
Abbie NORML
Molon Labe. Public Disorder.
9
|
Posted - 2014.01.22 21:15:00 -
[120] - Quote
/signed
Corp battles caused the greatest heights of fun and hilarity I ever experienced in this game. |
|
843-BANE
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
456
|
Posted - 2014.01.22 21:15:00 -
[121] - Quote
What are you talking about? I just want to talk to him about something to do with this thread, leave anything else outta this thread man that's all this is about.
BUMP
BRING BACK CORP BATTLES
SIGN THE PEITION HERE
|
Killar-12
The Corporate Raiders Top Men.
2053
|
Posted - 2014.01.22 21:20:00 -
[122] - Quote
843-BANE wrote:
What are you talking about? I just want to talk to him about something to do with this thread, leave anything else outta this thread man that's all this is about.
BUMP
Sorry neither of you use IRC and I don't know either of your skypes... I prefer to keep this stuff private, it's not above top secret but I don't like the Trolls here... I'll be available Saturday or Sunday or in the late night Thursday and Friday. I guess I does relate to getting CBs back just in-case it doesn't come next patch... and many other things.
A-Teams win Battles B-Teams win Campaigns C-Teams win Wars
|
843-BANE
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
456
|
Posted - 2014.01.22 21:23:00 -
[123] - Quote
Killar-12 wrote:843-BANE wrote:
What are you talking about? I just want to talk to him about something to do with this thread, leave anything else outta this thread man that's all this is about.
BUMP
Sorry neither of you use IRC and I don't know either of your skypes... I prefer to keep this stuff private, it's not above top secret but I don't like the Trolls here... I'll be available Saturday or Sunday or in the late night Thursday and Friday. I guess I does relate to getting CBs back just in-case it doesn't come next patch... and many other things.
If you ever need to talk to me, come to www.843.enjin.com and I'll be there :)
BRING BACK CORP BATTLES
SIGN THE PEITION HERE
|
Killar-12
The Corporate Raiders Top Men.
2053
|
Posted - 2014.01.22 21:25:00 -
[124] - Quote
843-BANE wrote:Killar-12 wrote:843-BANE wrote:
What are you talking about? I just want to talk to him about something to do with this thread, leave anything else outta this thread man that's all this is about.
BUMP
Sorry neither of you use IRC and I don't know either of your skypes... I prefer to keep this stuff private, it's not above top secret but I don't like the Trolls here... I'll be available Saturday or Sunday or in the late night Thursday and Friday. I guess I does relate to getting CBs back just in-case it doesn't come next patch... and many other things. If you ever need to talk to me, come to www.843.enjin.com and I'll be there :) Oh? if it's private then great, I've got class in 36 mins and have to get to campus, I'll be back in 3 hours and 15-20 mins
A-Teams win Battles B-Teams win Campaigns C-Teams win Wars
|
843-BANE
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
456
|
Posted - 2014.01.22 21:30:00 -
[125] - Quote
Killar-12 wrote:843-BANE wrote:Killar-12 wrote:843-BANE wrote:
What are you talking about? I just want to talk to him about something to do with this thread, leave anything else outta this thread man that's all this is about.
BUMP
Sorry neither of you use IRC and I don't know either of your skypes... I prefer to keep this stuff private, it's not above top secret but I don't like the Trolls here... I'll be available Saturday or Sunday or in the late night Thursday and Friday. I guess I does relate to getting CBs back just in-case it doesn't come next patch... and many other things. If you ever need to talk to me, come to www.843.enjin.com and I'll be there :) Oh? if it's private then great, I've got class in 36 mins and have to get to campus, I'll be back in 3 hours and 15-20 mins
Unlikely I'll still be awake but, just register on the site and say that you're a friend of 843, you'll get ally tags and we can chat in private yea
BRING BACK CORP BATTLES
SIGN THE PEITION HERE
|
843-BANE
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
456
|
Posted - 2014.01.22 21:31:00 -
[126] - Quote
Bump.
Don't let up guys, this is only the beginning.
Do you hear the community, CCP? Do you hear your paying customers? Do you hear you fanbase that you supposedly adore? Do you?
BRING BACK CORP BATTLES
SIGN THE PEITION HERE
|
Marad''er
Ancient Exiles. Renegade Alliance
522
|
Posted - 2014.01.22 21:35:00 -
[127] - Quote
843-BANE wrote:
No no, there's no rush. I'll see ya when I see ya.
Ok :)
GôÉGô¥GôÿGô£Gôö > GôÉGô¢Gô¢
Gÿà¿When will dust get better?Gÿà
Forum Warrior LV. 4 | pâÅpéñpâápü»tºüpü«µëôµÆâpéÆF¦ápüúpüªpüäpéï | PSN: I-NINJA-ALL-DAY
|
843-BANE
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
456
|
Posted - 2014.01.22 21:47:00 -
[128] - Quote
Bump
BRING BACK CORP BATTLES
SIGN THE PEITION HERE
|
843-BANE
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
457
|
Posted - 2014.01.22 23:28:00 -
[129] - Quote
Back to the top you go.
BRING BACK CORP BATTLES
SIGN THE PEITION HERE
|
Ulysses Knapse
Knapse and Co. Mercenary Firm
1103
|
Posted - 2014.01.22 23:30:00 -
[130] - Quote
If capsuleers can bet on which horse they think will win, I could agree with this.
Oh, I'm sorry, I meant corporation, not horse. I didn't mean to offend the horses.
What's the difference between an immobile Minmatar ship and a pile of garbage?
The pile of garbage is more lethal.
|
|
843-Vika
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
6
|
Posted - 2014.01.22 23:39:00 -
[131] - Quote
bump this **** to the top and let CCP know we the consumer have spoken. |
Dunkel Hoffnung Mk3
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
6
|
Posted - 2014.01.23 00:40:00 -
[132] - Quote
Bump!
When life gives you lemons....BLOOD FOR THE BLOOD GOD!
|
Trenix Keltron
Onuoto Uakan Huogaatsu
34
|
Posted - 2014.01.23 03:22:00 -
[133] - Quote
I support
OUKH corporation recruitment active. Initiate enlistment protocols. The future is now
|
Numinacer
KNIGHTZ OF THE ROUND Legacy Rising
8
|
Posted - 2014.01.23 03:41:00 -
[134] - Quote
Killar-12 wrote:Darken-Soul wrote:Everyone wants this except CCP. why not? Because Corp battles will hurt PC if not kill it outright because PC is a horrible Idea that either needs removed or radically reworked requiring activity or action to make ISK but they need returned... badly I don't see how this would kill, or even put a dent into p/c battles. If anything it would strengthen it. Now you have to train your guys in public matches, which isn't always a good idea. Once corps trained their guys in this attacks would happen more often with a better faith in your team seen in these battles. I say DO IT CCP FOR THE DUSTERS SAKE!!! +1 |
Killar-12
The Corporate Raiders Top Men.
2054
|
Posted - 2014.01.23 03:44:00 -
[135] - Quote
Numinacer wrote:Killar-12 wrote:Darken-Soul wrote:Everyone wants this except CCP. why not? Because Corp battles will hurt PC if not kill it outright because PC is a horrible Idea that either needs removed or radically reworked requiring activity or action to make ISK but they need returned... badly I don't see how this would kill, or even put a dent into p/c battles. If anything it would strengthen it. Now you have to train your guys in public matches, which isn't always a good idea. Once corps trained their guys in this attacks would happen more often with a better faith in your team seen in these battles. I say DO IT CCP FOR THE DUSTERS SAKE!!! +1 I'll guarentee I can make a profit doing CBs, PC is an meaningless broken game mode in which the only 2 ways to make ISK are to Hire Ringers or lock districts...
A-Teams win Battles B-Teams win Campaigns C-Teams win Wars
|
Numinacer
KNIGHTZ OF THE ROUND Legacy Rising
9
|
Posted - 2014.01.23 03:56:00 -
[136] - Quote
Killar-12 wrote:Numinacer wrote:Killar-12 wrote:Darken-Soul wrote:Everyone wants this except CCP. why not? Because Corp battles will hurt PC if not kill it outright because PC is a horrible Idea that either needs removed or radically reworked requiring activity or action to make ISK but they need returned... badly I don't see how this would kill, or even put a dent into p/c battles. If anything it would strengthen it. Now you have to train your guys in public matches, which isn't always a good idea. Once corps trained their guys in this attacks would happen more often with a better faith in your team seen in these battles. I say DO IT CCP FOR THE DUSTERS SAKE!!! +1 I'll guarentee I can make a profit doing CBs, PC is an meaningless broken game mode in which the only 2 ways to make ISK are to Hire Ringers or lock districts... I feel like everyone who hates pc either A. constantly loses or B. Their corp won't let them do them. I'm not saying that's why you hate them killar, but whatever reason you want corp battles back I agree with it. |
Killar-12
The Corporate Raiders Top Men.
2054
|
Posted - 2014.01.23 03:57:00 -
[137] - Quote
Numinacer wrote:Killar-12 wrote:Numinacer wrote:Killar-12 wrote:Darken-Soul wrote:Everyone wants this except CCP. why not? Because Corp battles will hurt PC if not kill it outright because PC is a horrible Idea that either needs removed or radically reworked requiring activity or action to make ISK but they need returned... badly I don't see how this would kill, or even put a dent into p/c battles. If anything it would strengthen it. Now you have to train your guys in public matches, which isn't always a good idea. Once corps trained their guys in this attacks would happen more often with a better faith in your team seen in these battles. I say DO IT CCP FOR THE DUSTERS SAKE!!! +1 I'll guarentee I can make a profit doing CBs, PC is an meaningless broken game mode in which the only 2 ways to make ISK are to Hire Ringers or lock districts... I feel like everyone who hates pc either A. constantly loses or B. Their corp won't let them do them. I'm not saying that's why you hate them killar, but whatever reason you want corp battles back I agree with it. Then a toast... to corp battles an a bump...
A-Teams win Battles B-Teams win Campaigns C-Teams win Wars
|
Numinacer
KNIGHTZ OF THE ROUND Legacy Rising
10
|
Posted - 2014.01.23 04:02:00 -
[138] - Quote
Agreed, a toast. |
deepfried salad gilliam
Sanguine Knights
388
|
Posted - 2014.01.23 04:36:00 -
[139] - Quote
Numinacer wrote:Killar-12 wrote:Numinacer wrote:Killar-12 wrote:Darken-Soul wrote:Everyone wants this except CCP. why not? Because Corp battles will hurt PC if not kill it outright because PC is a horrible Idea that either needs removed or radically reworked requiring activity or action to make ISK but they need returned... badly I don't see how this would kill, or even put a dent into p/c battles. If anything it would strengthen it. Now you have to train your guys in public matches, which isn't always a good idea. Once corps trained their guys in this attacks would happen more often with a better faith in your team seen in these battles. I say DO IT CCP FOR THE DUSTERS SAKE!!! +1 I'll guarentee I can make a profit doing CBs, PC is an meaningless broken game mode in which the only 2 ways to make ISK are to Hire Ringers or lock districts... I feel like everyone who hates pc either A. constantly loses or B. Their corp won't let them do them. I'm not saying that's why you hate them killar, but whatever reason you want corp battles back I agree with it. or it could be the fact that pc is an extremely broken isk farm that a small portion of the player base gets a peice of and the fact that it just makes large amounts of isk out of nothing will completly screw p2p market but you know its cool
Proud Christian
one of the most essential parts of eve is left out of dust: freedom, exploration, open-world gameplay.
|
Soraya Xel
The Corporate Raiders Top Men.
1198
|
Posted - 2014.01.23 06:50:00 -
[140] - Quote
Definitely supported.
There are parts that'd need redesign, namely that the old corp battles was FacWar, and that it'd be nice to have some rudimentary options for the match like game mode and maybe, someday, a map choice. I'd rather refer to them as Custom Matches or some such, rather than Corp Battles. And I think it'd need to omit counting towards SP or stats or anything, to prevent exploitative farming.
I'd like to be your CPM1 candidate
|
|
Moorian Flav
Ectype Inc.
121
|
Posted - 2014.01.23 07:46:00 -
[141] - Quote
I think corp battles should come back and PC should be removed until properly fixed. After all, how many "PC is broken" threads are out there now? Too long have too few corps benefited (and often exploited) the broken game mode that is called PC.
I don't troll; I tell the truth.
|
843-BANE
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
464
|
Posted - 2014.01.23 12:06:00 -
[142] - Quote
100% of people agree so far CCP!
BRING BACK CORP BATTLES
SIGN THE PEITION HERE
|
Patrick57
Fatal Absolution Covert Intervention
4186
|
Posted - 2014.01.23 13:27:00 -
[143] - Quote
Keep this at the TOP.
Winner of at least 10 King ThunderBolt hate videos :D
|
NAV HIV
The Generals General Tso's Alliance
852
|
Posted - 2014.01.23 13:28:00 -
[144] - Quote
Charge me AUR, I'll Pay.. Just bring back This tool please |
843-BANE
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
465
|
Posted - 2014.01.23 13:33:00 -
[145] - Quote
Hell yeah
BRING BACK CORP BATTLES
SIGN THE PEITION HERE
|
Roman837
Dem Durrty Boyz Renegade Alliance
90
|
Posted - 2014.01.23 13:40:00 -
[146] - Quote
Signed, Bump
EX STB Director(Diplomat and PC/FC dude) Also a Maple Syrup Drinking Canadian
|
843-BANE
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
466
|
Posted - 2014.01.23 16:44:00 -
[147] - Quote
Roman837 wrote:Signed, Bump
Thanks man!
BRING BACK CORP BATTLES
SIGN THE PEITION HERE
|
NextDark Knight
Hellstorm Inc League of Infamy
143
|
Posted - 2014.01.23 17:27:00 -
[148] - Quote
You know, Return corp battles if we have to buy the clone from PFC districts. Plus add the wager back on top of that should make for fun.
Forge Changes needed Officer Splash 3.0, Proto 2.7 Advanced 2.5 Standard 2.1.
Original ROF needs to return!
|
DANJA DOM
FREE AGENTS LP
5
|
Posted - 2014.01.23 17:54:00 -
[149] - Quote
+1
"Rules were made to be broken"
|
843-BANE
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
467
|
Posted - 2014.01.23 17:59:00 -
[150] - Quote
Bump.
I'm not letting this go CCP :D
BRING BACK CORP BATTLES
SIGN THE PEITION HERE
|
|
EuroTraining
Capital Acquisitions LLC Public Disorder.
5
|
Posted - 2014.01.23 18:02:00 -
[151] - Quote
+1 |
Arkena Wyrnspire
Fatal Absolution Covert Intervention
8283
|
Posted - 2014.01.23 18:13:00 -
[152] - Quote
NEVER LET THE DREAM DIE
Level 8 Forum Warrior
Lenin of the glorious armoured revolution
|
843-BANE
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
469
|
Posted - 2014.01.23 18:14:00 -
[153] - Quote
Arkena Wyrnspire wrote:NEVER LET THE DREAM DIE
They can never stop me!!!
BRING BACK CORP BATTLES
SIGN THE PEITION HERE
|
Fox Gaden
Immortal Guides
2228
|
Posted - 2014.01.23 18:18:00 -
[154] - Quote
As the CEO of a training Corp and a founding member of the Learning Coalition I support this proposal.
I would hope that current PC match entry mechanics would apply though, so members of the Corp could bring in squad members from other Corps. This would make Dropship Flight School a whole lot more viable.
Fox Gaden: DUST Wall of Fame, 2014
|
Thor Odinson42
Molon Labe. Public Disorder.
2569
|
Posted - 2014.01.23 18:25:00 -
[155] - Quote
Fox Gaden wrote:As the CEO of a training Corp and a founding member of the Learning Coalition I support this proposal.
I would hope that current PC match entry mechanics would apply though, so members of the Corp could bring in squad members from other Corps. This would make Dropship Flight School a whole lot more viable.
Well I'd say the introduction of a Team Deploy UI to allow squad members to build their squads from within the team would save headaches on a level not understood by many.
Logistics of PC are one of the biggest causes of burnout.
ML Director
Eve Toon - Raylan Scott
|
843-BANE
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
470
|
Posted - 2014.01.23 18:31:00 -
[156] - Quote
Bump
BRING BACK CORP BATTLES
SIGN THE PEITION HERE
|
shaman oga
Nexus Balusa Horizon
1373
|
Posted - 2014.01.23 18:52:00 -
[157] - Quote
Signed
1.8 it's so secret that nobody know what will be in it, even after patch notes...
|
Arkena Wyrnspire
Fatal Absolution Covert Intervention
8292
|
Posted - 2014.01.23 19:09:00 -
[158] - Quote
Ten minutes is too long for this to go without a BUMP.
Level 8 Forum Warrior
Lenin of the glorious armoured revolution
|
843-BANE
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
472
|
Posted - 2014.01.23 19:23:00 -
[159] - Quote
Yes it is! Bump!
BRING BACK CORP BATTLES
SIGN THE PEITION HERE
|
CLONE117
planetary retaliation organisation ACME Holding Conglomerate
593
|
Posted - 2014.01.23 19:28:00 -
[160] - Quote
this is needed.. |
|
Aramis Madrigal
SVER True Blood Public Disorder.
104
|
Posted - 2014.01.23 19:36:00 -
[161] - Quote
This needs to happen sooner rather than later as it gives the community a tool to create sandbox gameplay experiences. It allows us to create the game modes that we want on our terms. It would go a long way towards making it more feasible for smaller corps to practice for PC (if that is their end goal.) Further, imagine the crazy tactics that could be developed by top tier corps if you could deploy a team for both sides. You would have time to explore the map at your leisure, try out different squad and vehicle compositions, practice optimum positioning and movement for sweeping/clearing compounds, etc. The possibilities are endless. The most frustrating thing is that this game mode once existed. The amount of time and resources to get this game mode up and running again pale in comparison to the positive effect in would have on the game.
-Aramis
|
843-BANE
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
473
|
Posted - 2014.01.23 19:41:00 -
[162] - Quote
Aramis Madrigal wrote:This needs to happen sooner rather than later as it gives the community a tool to create sandbox gameplay experiences. It allows us to create the game modes that we want on our terms. It would go a long way towards making it more feasible for smaller corps to practice for PC (if that is their end goal.) Further, imagine the crazy tactics that could be developed by top tier corps if you could deploy a team for both sides. You would have time to explore the map at your leisure, try out different squad and vehicle compositions, practice optimum positioning and movement for sweeping/clearing compounds, etc. The possibilities are endless. The most frustrating thing is that this game mode once existed. The amount of time and resources to get this game mode up and running again pale in comparison to the positive effect in would have on the game.
-Aramis
This. +100
BRING BACK CORP BATTLES
SIGN THE PEITION HERE
|
Marad''er
Ancient Exiles. Renegade Alliance
539
|
Posted - 2014.01.23 20:46:00 -
[163] - Quote
Back to the top
GôÉGô¥GôÿGô£Gôö > GôÉGô¢Gô¢
Gÿà¿When will dust get better?Gÿà
Forum Warrior LV. 4 | pâÅpéñpâápü»tºüpü«µëôµÆâpéÆF¦ápüúpüªpüäpéï | PSN: I-NINJA-ALL-DAY
|
Aramis Madrigal
SVER True Blood Public Disorder.
105
|
Posted - 2014.01.23 21:09:00 -
[164] - Quote
Bump. Why can't we be let out on the playground with a bunch of guns and allowed to make up our own games, like in grade school?
-Aramis
P.S. I feel like a kid who received a bunch of presents but just wants to play in the empty box. Why? Because it can be anything! Even a box! (Corp battles are the empty box in this ill-conceived metaphorGǪ) |
Patrick57
Fatal Absolution Covert Intervention
4200
|
Posted - 2014.01.23 21:24:00 -
[165] - Quote
Don't stop believing!!!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KCy7lLQwToI
Winner of at least 10 King ThunderBolt hate videos :D
|
843-BANE
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
476
|
Posted - 2014.01.23 22:52:00 -
[166] - Quote
Hold on to that feeling!
BRING BACK CORP BATTLES
SIGN THE PEITION HERE
|
Cpt Merdock
The Exemplars Top Men.
179
|
Posted - 2014.01.23 23:09:00 -
[167] - Quote
....looking just to find emotion...
Bump. I support this. |
843-BANE
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
478
|
Posted - 2014.01.23 23:52:00 -
[168] - Quote
bump
BRING BACK CORP BATTLES
SIGN THE PEITION HERE
|
Marad''er
Ancient Exiles. Renegade Alliance
548
|
Posted - 2014.01.24 00:13:00 -
[169] - Quote
Ala bump
GôÉGô¥GôÿGô£Gôö > GôÉGô¢Gô¢
Gÿà¿When will dust get better?Gÿà
Forum Warrior LV. 4 | pâÅpéñpâápü»tºüpü«µëôµÆâpéÆF¦ápüúpüªpüäpéï | PSN: I-NINJA-ALL-DAY
|
The-Errorist
486
|
Posted - 2014.01.24 01:22:00 -
[170] - Quote
+1 |
|
Dalmont Legrand
252
|
Posted - 2014.01.24 04:20:00 -
[171] - Quote
THERE ARE 69 LIKES NOW SO DON'T TOUCH IT
You want to make it shallow - bring contracts back. Corporation contracts are nothing else but ISK-Time wasting on getting notion of who is the best.
The only reason why it calls attention is lack of patience for PC battles and impossibility to organize in existing matters,(tech side also); you want to bring back old stuff unless waiting for improvement of existing or new ones? You want an instant battle, any good reasons?
People, you can't resist massive alliance landholdings in Molden because you don't want and can't organize, now tell me about instant battles. Is corporation contract easy enough for you to organize people? Well it is. Now remember, hardcore is difficulty in every aspect of something so let it stay hardcore.
Maybe a future thought on PVP like in EVE is what you want? We have it. It calls public matches.
This and a "pushed-to-like" topics make it less reasonable. Find another way and then break through.
*No mental harm intended in this comment - political correctness - hate it...
Liked the original topic though Like #69
Of something nothing is everything.
|
Marad''er
Ancient Exiles. Renegade Alliance
550
|
Posted - 2014.01.24 07:35:00 -
[172] - Quote
Back to the top
GôÉGô¥GôÿGô£Gôö > GôÉGô¢Gô¢
Gÿà¿When will dust get better?Gÿà
Forum Warrior LV. 4 | pâÅpéñpâápü»tºüpü«µëôµÆâpéÆF¦ápüúpüªpüäpéï | PSN: I-NINJA-ALL-DAY
|
843-BANE
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
483
|
Posted - 2014.01.24 10:36:00 -
[173] - Quote
Dalmont Legrand wrote:THERE ARE 69 LIKES NOW SO DON'T TOUCH IT You want to make it shallow - bring contracts back. Corporation contracts are nothing else but ISK-Time wasting on getting notion of who is the best. The only reason why it calls attention is lack of patience for PC battles and impossibility to organize in existing matters,(tech side also); you want to bring back old stuff unless waiting for improvement of existing or new ones? You want an instant battle, any good reasons? People, you can't resist massive alliance landholdings in Molden because you don't want and can't organize, now tell me about instant battles. Is corporation contract easy enough for you to organize people? Well it is. Now remember, hardcore is difficulty in every aspect of something so let it stay hardcore. Maybe a future thought on PVP like in EVE is what you want? We have it. It calls public matches. This and a "pushed-to-like" topics make it less reasonable. Find another way and then break through. *No mental harm intended in this comment - political correctness - hate it... Liked the original topic though Like #69
PC is breaking the game and breaking people. I couldn't begin to name the sheer amount of people who have left dust, the amount of corporations and alliances that have crumbled because of PC. That's not because we "can't handle" it, persay, more that CCP is prioritising bullshit EVE interaction over our actual gameplay experience. We all had way more fun in corp battles, no matter how 'shallow' they may seem, they were fun. We could fight when we want, who we want, for how much, no politics, no stigmas, no worrying "Oh but if I attack them they might take my stuff", no restrictions on what kids can play in the sandpit and there was no spam or glitches because people just wanted to fight fair and win fair. PC has taken that away from us.
Bumping this back up to the top.
BRING BACK CORP BATTLES
SIGN THE PEITION HERE
|
843-BANE
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
485
|
Posted - 2014.01.24 11:02:00 -
[174] - Quote
Bump
BRING BACK CORP BATTLES
SIGN THE PEITION HERE
|
843-BANE
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
485
|
Posted - 2014.01.24 11:17:00 -
[175] - Quote
Just think about the possibilities of corp battles returning!!
Imagine the humongous contrscts that could be set by behemoth corporations like AE vs.. say.. Nyain San?! TeamPlayers vs AE Round 2? Billions of ISK on the line? All with a fair fight and no spam? I'd hope corporation battles could bring back this kind of excitement.
Remember when Pink fluffies intercepted ContraBan's 300 Million (correct me if figure is wrong) ISK and it was one of the biggest moments for everyone back then?
I MISS those days.
BRING BACK CORP BATTLES
SIGN THE PEITION HERE
|
Judas Iscariot666
SVER True Blood Public Disorder.
59
|
Posted - 2014.01.24 12:50:00 -
[176] - Quote
Transgender Scrub Scout bump... With bacon!!!
Director of Public Relations // Scrub Scout // All around nice guy
|
Bear D'Grassi
Forsaken Immortals Top Men.
42
|
Posted - 2014.01.24 13:44:00 -
[177] - Quote
Such an obvious move, perhaps this is why it has been overlooked.
|
Sum1ne Else
WASTELAND JUNK REMOVAL Top Men.
854
|
Posted - 2014.01.24 14:56:00 -
[178] - Quote
CCP need to blue tag this. Anyone want to blow up their twitter accounts with a link?
Public Relations WJR
Its a leopleuradon Charlie a magical leoplueradon, its gunna guide our way to candy mountain!
|
843-BANE
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
496
|
Posted - 2014.01.24 16:11:00 -
[179] - Quote
Sum1ne Else wrote:CCP need to blue tag this. Anyone want to blow up their twitter accounts with a link?
Uh, yes?!
BRING BACK CORP BATTLES
SIGN THE PEITION HERE
|
Aramis Madrigal
SVER True Blood Public Disorder.
111
|
Posted - 2014.01.24 16:35:00 -
[180] - Quote
Dalmont Legrand wrote:THERE ARE 69 LIKES NOW SO DON'T TOUCH IT You want to make it shallow - bring contracts back. Corporation contracts are nothing else but ISK-Time wasting on getting notion of who is the best. The only reason why it calls attention is lack of patience for PC battles and impossibility to organize in existing matters,(tech side also); you want to bring back old stuff unless waiting for improvement of existing or new ones? You want an instant battle, any good reasons? People, you can't resist massive alliance landholdings in Molden because you don't want and can't organize, now tell me about instant battles. Is corporation contract easy enough for you to organize people? Well it is. Now remember, hardcore is difficulty in every aspect of something so let it stay hardcore. Maybe a future thought on PVP like in EVE is what you want? We have it. It calls public matches. This and a "pushed-to-like" topics make it less reasonable. Find another way and then break through. *No mental harm intended in this comment - political correctness - hate it... Liked the original topic though Like #69
I think you may be missing the possibilities that corporate battles present with regards to training and unique game modes. A lot of what makes EVE interesting is that you have room to define how you want to play the game. The return of corporate battles would give the community a tool to do some of the same things in DUST. I donGÇÖt want Corp battles as an alternative to PC. Rather, Corp battles open up new possibilities and could actually make PC better. Right now itGÇÖs a pain to organize thunder dome type events, death races and other crazy match formats. Corp battles could provide a place for these types of games. Full team deployment requires queue syncing and still doesnGÇÖt provide the kind of opportunity for deliberate training that Corp battles allow.
-Aramis
|
|
DraC0X
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
26
|
Posted - 2014.01.24 17:23:00 -
[181] - Quote
Sanctuary!!!! Sanctuary!!!! Sanctuary!!!!
Hmmm diferent movie...
In Any case Bring Back the Corp Battles!!!
|
843-BANE
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
497
|
Posted - 2014.01.24 17:25:00 -
[182] - Quote
DraC0X wrote:Sanctuary!!!! Sanctuary!!!! Sanctuary!!!!
Hmmm diferent movie...
In Any case Bring Back the Corp Battles!!!
Lmfao
BRING BACK CORP BATTLES
SIGN THE PEITION HERE
|
Vell0cet
SVER True Blood Public Disorder.
830
|
Posted - 2014.01.24 17:49:00 -
[183] - Quote
+1
No ISK/SP though or it could be abused to farm ISK/SP.
Quick/Dirty Test Range Idea
|
843-BANE
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
497
|
Posted - 2014.01.24 18:32:00 -
[184] - Quote
Bump
BRING BACK CORP BATTLES
SIGN THE PEITION HERE
|
Marad''er
Ancient Exiles. Renegade Alliance
573
|
Posted - 2014.01.24 19:02:00 -
[185] - Quote
Bump
GôÉGô¥GôÿGô£Gôö > GôÉGô¢Gô¢
Gÿà¿When will dust get better?Gÿà
Forum Warrior LV. 4 | pâÅpéñpâápü»tºüpü«µëôµÆâpéÆF¦ápüúpüªpüäpéï | PSN: I-NINJA-ALL-DAY
|
843-BANE
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
550
|
Posted - 2014.01.24 19:11:00 -
[186] - Quote
Bump
BRING BACK CORP BATTLES
SIGN THE PEITION HERE
|
Cooper Eudaemon
DUST University Ivy League
139
|
Posted - 2014.01.24 19:11:00 -
[187] - Quote
Training corporations need this so badly!
I need a break from Dust! I'll just go hop on the forums...
I need a break from the forums! I'll just go hop on Dust...
|
NextDark Knight
Hellstorm Inc League of Infamy
154
|
Posted - 2014.01.24 19:12:00 -
[188] - Quote
Hmm.. 400 and 400 clone ambush with no timer. Winning corp take 30 Billion POT, Mercs get payout from Genolution Biomass.
Forge Changes needed Officer Splash 3.0, Proto 2.7 Advanced 2.5 Standard 2.1.
Original ROF needs to return!
|
KenKaniff69
Fatal Absolution Covert Intervention
1939
|
Posted - 2014.01.24 19:14:00 -
[189] - Quote
Why no blue tag?
So about those vehicle locks...
|
NextDark Knight
Hellstorm Inc League of Infamy
156
|
Posted - 2014.01.24 19:22:00 -
[190] - Quote
Vell0cet wrote:+1
No ISK/SP though or it could be abused to farm ISK/SP.
If they buy the clones then ISK/SP is ok.
Forge Changes needed Officer Splash 3.0, Proto 2.7 Advanced 2.5 Standard 2.1.
Original ROF needs to return!
|
|
843-BANE
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
550
|
Posted - 2014.01.24 19:24:00 -
[191] - Quote
KenKaniff69 wrote:Why no blue tag?
They REALLY don't want to acknowledge this. The CPM also refuse to comment directly.
BRING BACK CORP BATTLES
SIGN THE PEITION HERE
|
843-BANE
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
550
|
Posted - 2014.01.24 19:44:00 -
[192] - Quote
Bump.
BRING BACK CORP BATTLES
SIGN THE PEITION HERE
|
John Mocahn
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
342
|
Posted - 2014.01.24 19:52:00 -
[193] - Quote
With all this support........and then some, CCP will have egg on their face if its not done.
Bump, keep it going guys!
843 Recruitment Officer
Proto Heavy // Prof.5 HMG // Prof. 4 Forge
BurgezzE.T.F
|
Heimdallr69
Ancient Exiles. Renegade Alliance
1462
|
Posted - 2014.01.24 19:58:00 -
[194] - Quote
Hmm Bump.
Removed inappropriate content - CCP Logibro
|
8213
BIG BAD W0LVES
1452
|
Posted - 2014.01.24 20:11:00 -
[195] - Quote
I spy with my little eye, something blue...
Oh wait, nevermind
Fish in a bucket!
|
843-BANE
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
551
|
Posted - 2014.01.24 20:13:00 -
[196] - Quote
What is with this, CCP?!
BRING BACK CORP BATTLES
SIGN THE PEITION HERE
|
Killar-12
The Corporate Raiders Top Men.
2074
|
Posted - 2014.01.24 20:14:00 -
[197] - Quote
843-BANE wrote:KenKaniff69 wrote:Why no blue tag? They REALLY don't want to acknowledge this. The CPM also refuse to comment directly. Sometimes it's better to NOT comment and not stir up anything even good news can be better kept quiet.
A-Teams win Battles B-Teams win Campaigns C-Teams win Wars
|
843-BANE
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
551
|
Posted - 2014.01.24 20:18:00 -
[198] - Quote
Killar-12 wrote:843-BANE wrote:KenKaniff69 wrote:Why no blue tag? They REALLY don't want to acknowledge this. The CPM also refuse to comment directly. Sometimes it's better to NOT comment and not stir up anything even good news can be better kept quiet.
Yes, but this is CCP :P
BRING BACK CORP BATTLES
SIGN THE PEITION HERE
|
843-BANE
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
551
|
Posted - 2014.01.24 20:51:00 -
[199] - Quote
Bump
BRING BACK CORP BATTLES
SIGN THE PEITION HERE
|
Heimdallr69
Ancient Exiles. Renegade Alliance
1464
|
Posted - 2014.01.24 21:31:00 -
[200] - Quote
Yo Logibro, we want it back.
Removed inappropriate content - CCP Logibro
|
|
843-BANE
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
551
|
Posted - 2014.01.24 21:46:00 -
[201] - Quote
Where are you CCP
BRING BACK CORP BATTLES
SIGN THE PEITION HERE
|
Jenova Rhapsodos
Fatal Absolution Covert Intervention
116
|
Posted - 2014.01.24 22:11:00 -
[202] - Quote
843-BANE wrote:Where are you CCP
Yeah man! Where's the blue tag |
843-BANE
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
552
|
Posted - 2014.01.24 22:52:00 -
[203] - Quote
WHEEEEEEEEEEEERE
BRING BACK CORP BATTLES
SIGN THE PEITION HERE
|
Cpt Merdock
The Exemplars Top Men.
183
|
Posted - 2014.01.24 23:03:00 -
[204] - Quote
Im sure they have read it.
My theory is they took them out, although I think they should have stayed, to make us do exclusively PC to avoid having only a few corps to own most of M.H. because other corps would just do the Corp battles. Yet now we still have that situation and we dont even have corp battles to make up for the Flop that is PC. They should put them back in, and then work on PC to make it worth doing. I think corp battles need to stay regardless, its better for training and there is hardly any ISK involved..so less room for scams and corruption. |
Atiim
Living Like Larry Schwag
3897
|
Posted - 2014.01.24 23:05:00 -
[205] - Quote
If I report this thread, then I know it will get CCP's attention.
But knowing CCP, they'd probably lock this thread for bumping as opposed to replying to the topic at hand.
Next On To-Do List:
Particle Cannons
|
Text Grant
Death Firm. Canis Eliminatus Operatives
319
|
Posted - 2014.01.24 23:05:00 -
[206] - Quote
+1 |
843-BANE
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
554
|
Posted - 2014.01.24 23:41:00 -
[207] - Quote
Bump
BRING BACK CORP BATTLES
SIGN THE PEITION HERE
|
Arkena Wyrnspire
Fatal Absolution Covert Intervention
8341
|
Posted - 2014.01.25 00:05:00 -
[208] - Quote
40 minutes without a bump? I've slacked off.
Level 5 Proficiency 3 Forum Warrior
Lenin of the glorious armoured revolution
|
843-BANE
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
554
|
Posted - 2014.01.25 00:33:00 -
[209] - Quote
Not good enough my friend ;-)
BRING BACK CORP BATTLES
SIGN THE PEITION HERE
|
Reign Omega
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
111
|
Posted - 2014.01.25 02:48:00 -
[210] - Quote
Hear hear! Free beer! The old addage less is more does not apply here. More game modes, more fun. This was a great way to practice, set battle as, and blow off steam between corps. Settle a dispute? Make a wager? Everybody wins... bring it back!!!! |
|
Gelhad Thremyr
Quebec United The CORVOS
14
|
Posted - 2014.01.25 03:02:00 -
[211] - Quote
One two tree four, give me a bump for more ... |
P14GU3
The Southern Legion The Umbra Combine
514
|
Posted - 2014.01.25 05:00:00 -
[212] - Quote
Meh too lazy to supply info on site, but
/signed |
843-BANE
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
561
|
Posted - 2014.01.25 10:50:00 -
[213] - Quote
There are so many corporations out there I KNOW that struggle to afford 1 PC a week because they're members have to grind everytime to pay for it. With corp battles back everyone could be have as many fights as they like every night!!
BRING BACK CORP BATTLES
SIGN THE PEITION HERE
|
X7 lion
Swamp Tempo Canis Eliminatus Operatives
81
|
Posted - 2014.01.25 15:49:00 -
[214] - Quote
why not. |
843-BANE
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
563
|
Posted - 2014.01.25 15:53:00 -
[215] - Quote
Bump
BRING BACK CORP BATTLES
SIGN THE PEITION HERE
|
843-BANE
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
563
|
Posted - 2014.01.25 16:23:00 -
[216] - Quote
Bump
BRING BACK CORP BATTLES
SIGN THE PEITION HERE
|
Benjamin Ciscko
The Generals General Tso's Alliance
1346
|
Posted - 2014.01.25 16:28:00 -
[217] - Quote
What about different modes 6vs.6, 8vs.8, 12vs.12, 16vs.16 that way small corps who may only have 10 players on at peek time can train while bringing up their numbers and even big corps can focus on squad build up/ cohesion. Corps can also focus on holding two points without being over whelmed by a 5 point map.
Caldari Tanker/Minmatar Assault
Forum warrior lvl 1
|
843-BANE
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
563
|
Posted - 2014.01.25 16:38:00 -
[218] - Quote
Benjamin Ciscko wrote:What about different modes 6vs.6, 8vs.8, 12vs.12, 16vs.16 that way small corps who may only have 10 players on at peek time can train while bringing up their numbers and even big corps can focus on squad build up/ cohesion. Corps can also focus on holding two points without being over whelmed by a 5 point map.
Another great idea!! Might be a little complex for CCP to handle setting up a toggle option, but it's a good idea!
Come on CCP, seriously.
BRING BACK CORP BATTLES
SIGN THE PEITION HERE
|
Text Grant
Death Firm. Canis Eliminatus Operatives
320
|
Posted - 2014.01.25 17:11:00 -
[219] - Quote
843-BANE wrote:Benjamin Ciscko wrote:What about different modes 6vs.6, 8vs.8, 12vs.12, 16vs.16 that way small corps who may only have 10 players on at peek time can train while bringing up their numbers and even big corps can focus on squad build up/ cohesion. Corps can also focus on holding two points without being over whelmed by a 5 point map. Another great idea!! Might be a little complex for CCP to handle setting up a toggle option, but it's a good idea! Come on CCP, seriously. Sounds good. I'm all for a mode with only militia and basic gear only and no vehicles too |
Haerr
Molon Labe. Public Disorder.
194
|
Posted - 2014.01.25 17:19:00 -
[220] - Quote
+1
@CCP: Is the Cloaking Fields and Profile Dampeners reduction to Scan Profile stacking penalized when added together?
|
|
843-BANE
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
566
|
Posted - 2014.01.25 17:19:00 -
[221] - Quote
Bump
BRING BACK CORP BATTLES
SIGN THE PEITION HERE
|
GVGMODE
WorstPlayersEver
118
|
Posted - 2014.01.25 17:34:00 -
[222] - Quote
Let's be honest if we want to help small corps train a 16vs16 it would be very difficult for them to field them and on top of that many corporations would not want to field their 16 against randoms.
Therefore, it would be important for CCP to allow the contract issuer to set size on their own terms (8vs8 and 16vs16). |
Killar-12
The Corporate Raiders Top Men.
2082
|
Posted - 2014.01.25 20:38:00 -
[223] - Quote
GVGMODE wrote:Let's be honest if we want to help small corps train a 16vs16 it would be very difficult for them to field them and on top of that many corporations would not want to field their 16 against randoms.
Therefore, it would be important for CCP to allow the contract issuer to set size on their own terms (8vs8 and 16vs16). Maybe gamemode and some other things too..
A-Teams win Battles B-Teams win Campaigns C-Teams win Wars
|
843-BANE
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
569
|
Posted - 2014.01.25 22:02:00 -
[224] - Quote
Bump! Don't slack on the bumps D:
BRING BACK CORP BATTLES
SIGN THE PEITION HERE
|
Benjamin Ciscko
The Generals General Tso's Alliance
1355
|
Posted - 2014.01.25 22:25:00 -
[225] - Quote
843-BANE wrote:Bump! Don't slack on the bumps D: Your going to get it locked.
Caldari Tanker/Minmatar Assault
Forum warrior lvl 1
|
843-BANE
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
569
|
Posted - 2014.01.25 22:26:00 -
[226] - Quote
Benjamin Ciscko wrote:843-BANE wrote:Bump! Don't slack on the bumps D: Your going to get it locked.
Bring it on
BRING BACK CORP BATTLES
SIGN THE PEITION HERE
|
843-BANE
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
569
|
Posted - 2014.01.25 22:38:00 -
[227] - Quote
Bump.
BRING BACK CORP BATTLES
SIGN THE PEITION HERE
|
Reign Omega
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
112
|
Posted - 2014.01.25 23:10:00 -
[228] - Quote
It would be nice to be able to select game mode, size, friendly fire, even maps/sockets....I know the first step is simply, bringing the mode itself back and then fine tuning it, but from there many options present themselves. |
843-BANE
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
570
|
Posted - 2014.01.26 00:24:00 -
[229] - Quote
Bump
BRING BACK CORP BATTLES
SIGN THE PEITION HERE
|
KenKaniff69
Fatal Absolution Covert Intervention
1946
|
Posted - 2014.01.26 01:23:00 -
[230] - Quote
I see no reason why there shouldn't be a blue post on this.
So about those vehicle locks...
|
|
843-BANE
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
572
|
Posted - 2014.01.26 01:32:00 -
[231] - Quote
KenKaniff69 wrote:I see no reason why there shouldn't be a blue post on this.
Exactly. Me neither.
BRING BACK CORP BATTLES
SIGN THE PEITION HERE
|
Yokal Bob
G.R.A.V.E INTERGALACTIC WARPIGS
302
|
Posted - 2014.01.26 01:44:00 -
[232] - Quote
Here is the question, if corp battles were returned, who here would still partake in PC? Im all for corp battles as i hope it enhances the activity in planetary conquest.
CPM1 candidate
|
NoxMort3m
D.A.R.K L.E.G.I.O.N D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E
303
|
Posted - 2014.01.26 03:59:00 -
[233] - Quote
I agree with everything except the individual mercs payout, loot and isk for the individual should be around 60% of what pc battles are like. Corp battles get Beast,i miss the fun
Director:
Diplomat
Search DL514 to apply, include some character details
|
843-BANE
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
574
|
Posted - 2014.01.26 10:16:00 -
[234] - Quote
More and more people agree
BRING BACK CORP BATTLES
SIGN THE PEITION HERE
|
843-BANE
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
574
|
Posted - 2014.01.26 11:53:00 -
[235] - Quote
CCP?
BRING BACK CORP BATTLES
SIGN THE PEITION HERE
|
843-BANE
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
576
|
Posted - 2014.01.26 15:06:00 -
[236] - Quote
CCP where are you?
BRING BACK CORP BATTLES
SIGN THE PEITION HERE
|
RemingtonBeaver
Molon Labe. Public Disorder.
69
|
Posted - 2014.01.26 15:18:00 -
[237] - Quote
Wow , I didn't know this was a thing. Thanks for the bimpity bump. I agree with Bane here. This needs to be a thing. Smaller corps need to fight.
CCP could make it an ISK sink if it'll quantify it. Make the two teams pay in and say the payout is 80% to the winners and 20% goes to the New Eden Parks and Recreation Department. It'd be worth it to the winners and excellent experience to the losers. And anyone willing to put up the ISK could toss the gauntlet at whomever they'd like to.
FUN FUN FUN FUN FUN!
We can pickle that.
|
843-BANE
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
578
|
Posted - 2014.01.26 16:02:00 -
[238] - Quote
RemingtonBeaver wrote:Wow , I didn't know this was a thing. Thanks for the bimpity bump. I agree with Bane here. This needs to be a thing. Smaller corps need to fight.
CCP could make it an ISK sink if it'll quantify it. Make the two teams pay in and say the payout is 80% to the winners and 20% goes to the New Eden Parks and Recreation Department. It'd be worth it to the winners and excellent experience to the losers. And anyone willing to put up the ISK could toss the gauntlet at whomever they'd like to.
FUN FUN FUN FUN FUN!
Yeah that is the key word of the day for this thread: Fun.
Corp battles were fun CCP. PCs can be fun, but very rarely. It's usually just lag/spam.
BRING BACK CORP BATTLES
SIGN THE PEITION HERE
|
Patrick57
Fatal Absolution Covert Intervention
4269
|
Posted - 2014.01.26 16:21:00 -
[239] - Quote
Why is there no blue tag yet?!?!
Sad panda is sad
Winner of at least 11 King ThunderBolt hate videos :D
|
Gelhad Thremyr
Quebec United The CORVOS
16
|
Posted - 2014.01.26 16:27:00 -
[240] - Quote
Bump |
|
843-BANE
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
581
|
Posted - 2014.01.26 16:29:00 -
[241] - Quote
Day 5:
Still no blue tag
BRING BACK CORP BATTLES
SIGN THE PEITION HERE
|
Jenova Rhapsodos
Fatal Absolution Covert Intervention
134
|
Posted - 2014.01.26 16:38:00 -
[242] - Quote
Yokal Bob wrote:Here is the question, if corp battles were returned, who here would still partake in PC? Im all for corp battles as i hope it enhances the activity in planetary conquest.
People who are in it for the ISK and bragging rights probably. I don't think it would die completely. |
843-BANE
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
581
|
Posted - 2014.01.26 16:46:00 -
[243] - Quote
Jenova Rhapsodos wrote:Yokal Bob wrote:Here is the question, if corp battles were returned, who here would still partake in PC? Im all for corp battles as i hope it enhances the activity in planetary conquest. People who are in it for the ISK and bragging rights probably. I don't think it would die completely.
If it dies that says more about the PC system than anything else.
BRING BACK CORP BATTLES
SIGN THE PEITION HERE
|
843-BANE
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
581
|
Posted - 2014.01.26 17:15:00 -
[244] - Quote
bump
BRING BACK CORP BATTLES
SIGN THE PEITION HERE
|
Marad''er
Ancient Exiles. Renegade Alliance
649
|
Posted - 2014.01.26 18:34:00 -
[245] - Quote
Back to the top
GôÉGô¥GôÿGô£Gôö > GôÉGô¢Gô¢
Gÿà¿When will dust get better?Gÿà
Forum Warrior LV. 4 | pâÅpéñpâápü»tºüpü«µëôµÆâpéÆF¦ápüúpüªpüäpéï | PSN: I-NINJA-ALL-DAY
|
843-BANE
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
582
|
Posted - 2014.01.26 19:00:00 -
[246] - Quote
Annnnd again.
Will CCP reply? Will they lock the thread? Will they just ignore us? Find out SOONtm
BRING BACK CORP BATTLES
SIGN THE PEITION HERE
|
GVGMODE
WorstPlayersEver
122
|
Posted - 2014.01.26 20:06:00 -
[247] - Quote
If anything competition might spur in PC as new corporations start to improve, assuming that they are hungry to prove themselves and earn good ISK. |
843-BANE
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
584
|
Posted - 2014.01.26 20:20:00 -
[248] - Quote
And 1 more bump
BRING BACK CORP BATTLES
SIGN THE PEITION HERE
|
843-BANE
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
584
|
Posted - 2014.01.26 21:21:00 -
[249] - Quote
Bump
BRING BACK CORP BATTLES
SIGN THE PEITION HERE
|
Marad''er
Ancient Exiles. Renegade Alliance
661
|
Posted - 2014.01.27 02:01:00 -
[250] - Quote
Back to the top
GôÉGô¥GôÿGô£Gôö > GôÉGô¢Gô¢
Gÿà¿When will dust get better?Gÿà
Forum Warrior LV. 4 | pâÅpéñpâápü»tºüpü«µëôµÆâpéÆF¦ápüúpüªpüäpéï | PSN: I-NINJA-ALL-DAY
|
|
Bad Cheetah
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
11
|
Posted - 2014.01.27 05:20:00 -
[251] - Quote
I'm ashamed at the Devs here. You know this thread has been read, you know they have to read it to check for anything inappropriate. A simple reply that says it's been brought to the higher ups, it's in the works, whatever, would be GREATLY appreciated and rewarding to both yourselves and your business. As it stands now, it seems like the cries from your paying customers are not being responded to. Shame on you CCP, if the people that matter actually speak enough English to read this.
Let's see if that last comment gets a little reply ;) |
843-BANE
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
588
|
Posted - 2014.01.27 10:41:00 -
[252] - Quote
Bump
BRING BACK CORP BATTLES
SIGN THE PEITION HERE
|
843-BANE
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
589
|
Posted - 2014.01.27 13:36:00 -
[253] - Quote
Bump
BRING BACK CORP BATTLES
SIGN THE PEITION HERE
|
Killar-12
The Corporate Raiders Top Men.
2102
|
Posted - 2014.01.27 15:19:00 -
[254] - Quote
Bad Cheetah wrote:I'm ashamed at the Devs here. You know this thread has been read, you know they have to read it to check for anything inappropriate. A simple reply that says it's been brought to the higher ups, it's in the works, whatever, would be GREATLY appreciated and rewarding to both yourselves and your business. As it stands now, it seems like the cries from your paying customers are not being responded to. Shame on you CCP, if the people that matter actually speak enough English to read this.
Let's see if that last comment gets a little reply ;) Look at the armor thread it never got a dev response but look at the changes it caused.
A-Teams win Battles B-Teams win Campaigns C-Teams win Wars
|
Sum1ne Else
WASTELAND JUNK REMOVAL Top Men.
862
|
Posted - 2014.01.27 16:00:00 -
[255] - Quote
You are the dancing queen, young and sweet, only 17 ...thats still legal in my country
Public Relations WJR
Its a leopleuradon Charlie a magical leoplueradon, its gunna guide our way to candy mountain!
|
843-BANE
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
590
|
Posted - 2014.01.27 16:25:00 -
[256] - Quote
Killar-12 wrote:Bad Cheetah wrote:I'm ashamed at the Devs here. You know this thread has been read, you know they have to read it to check for anything inappropriate. A simple reply that says it's been brought to the higher ups, it's in the works, whatever, would be GREATLY appreciated and rewarding to both yourselves and your business. As it stands now, it seems like the cries from your paying customers are not being responded to. Shame on you CCP, if the people that matter actually speak enough English to read this.
Let's see if that last comment gets a little reply ;) Look at the armor thread it never got a dev response but look at the changes it caused.
All the more reason to keep pushing!
BRING BACK CORP BATTLES
SIGN THE PEITION HERE
|
Spectral Clone
Dust2Dust. Top Men.
1097
|
Posted - 2014.01.27 17:03:00 -
[257] - Quote
I like turtles.
Prepare for 1.8: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pPhISgw3I2w
|
843-BANE
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
596
|
Posted - 2014.01.27 19:19:00 -
[258] - Quote
Bump
BRING BACK CORP BATTLES
SIGN THE PEITION HERE
|
Arkena Wyrnspire
Fatal Absolution Covert Intervention
8575
|
Posted - 2014.01.27 20:27:00 -
[259] - Quote
Killar-12 wrote:Bad Cheetah wrote:I'm ashamed at the Devs here. You know this thread has been read, you know they have to read it to check for anything inappropriate. A simple reply that says it's been brought to the higher ups, it's in the works, whatever, would be GREATLY appreciated and rewarding to both yourselves and your business. As it stands now, it seems like the cries from your paying customers are not being responded to. Shame on you CCP, if the people that matter actually speak enough English to read this.
Let's see if that last comment gets a little reply ;) Look at the armor thread it never got a dev response but look at the changes it caused.
It was about half a year until anything came of that though. And that was a simple stat change.
Level 5 Proficiency 3 Forum Warrior
Lenin of the glorious armoured revolution
MAG Raven
|
843-BANE
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
598
|
Posted - 2014.01.27 20:48:00 -
[260] - Quote
Arkena Wyrnspire wrote:Killar-12 wrote:Bad Cheetah wrote:I'm ashamed at the Devs here. You know this thread has been read, you know they have to read it to check for anything inappropriate. A simple reply that says it's been brought to the higher ups, it's in the works, whatever, would be GREATLY appreciated and rewarding to both yourselves and your business. As it stands now, it seems like the cries from your paying customers are not being responded to. Shame on you CCP, if the people that matter actually speak enough English to read this.
Let's see if that last comment gets a little reply ;) Look at the armor thread it never got a dev response but look at the changes it caused. It was about half a year until anything came of that though. And that was a simple stat change.
I will never let this thread die. Don't underestimate my resilience CCP!
BRING BACK CORP BATTLES
SIGN THE PEITION HERE
|
|
Arkena Wyrnspire
Fatal Absolution Covert Intervention
8603
|
Posted - 2014.01.27 22:25:00 -
[261] - Quote
Yo. CCP. I know you have an irritating habit of being completely silent when you really should actually SAY SOMETHING to a thread massively supported by your few players.
But can we put it aside for a moment? Seriously. You've seen this. All you need to do is post 'Sounds like a good idea, we'll be on it!' or 'No, here's why:'. That's all.
ZATARA CARRIES US ALL
Lenin of the glorious armoured revolution
MAG Raven
|
Marad''er
Ancient Exiles. Renegade Alliance
712
|
Posted - 2014.01.27 22:25:00 -
[262] - Quote
843-BANE wrote:Arkena Wyrnspire wrote:Killar-12 wrote:Bad Cheetah wrote:I'm ashamed at the Devs here. You know this thread has been read, you know they have to read it to check for anything inappropriate. A simple reply that says it's been brought to the higher ups, it's in the works, whatever, would be GREATLY appreciated and rewarding to both yourselves and your business. As it stands now, it seems like the cries from your paying customers are not being responded to. Shame on you CCP, if the people that matter actually speak enough English to read this.
Let's see if that last comment gets a little reply ;) Look at the armor thread it never got a dev response but look at the changes it caused. It was about half a year until anything came of that though. And that was a simple stat change. I will never let this thread die. Don't underestimate my resilience CCP! Neither will I!
GôÉGô¥GôÿGô£Gôö > GôÉGô¢Gô¢
Gÿà¿When will dust get better?Gÿà
Forum Warrior LV. 4 | pâÅpéñpâápü»tºüpü«µëôµÆâpéÆF¦ápüúpüªpüäpéï | PSN: I-NINJA-ALL-DAY
|
Salviatino Maiano
Eternal Beings Proficiency V.
111
|
Posted - 2014.01.27 23:12:00 -
[263] - Quote
+8999 + previous +1's make's this post over 9000.
bump
I'm right behind you...
|
843-BANE
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
600
|
Posted - 2014.01.27 23:41:00 -
[264] - Quote
Bumping again, we got this guys.
BRING BACK CORP BATTLES
SIGN THE PEITION HERE
|
Benjamin Ciscko
The Generals General Tso's Alliance
1405
|
Posted - 2014.01.27 23:45:00 -
[265] - Quote
Would be cool if a corp could host a tourney w/ betting and such through Corp Battles perhaps even a mode with that effect.
Caldari Tanker/Minmatar Assault
Forum warrior lvl 1
|
843-BANE
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
602
|
Posted - 2014.01.28 00:16:00 -
[266] - Quote
Benjamin Ciscko wrote:Would be cool if a corp could host a tourney w/ betting and such through Corp Battles perhaps even a mode with that effect.
We did have tournaments with corp battles, they were awesome I remember fighting in them.
BRING BACK CORP BATTLES
SIGN THE PEITION HERE
|
Gavr1lo Pr1nc1p
TRA1LBLAZERS
307
|
Posted - 2014.01.28 01:43:00 -
[267] - Quote
do it CCP!!! and make it viable for newish corps like mine so i can see how i square off against corps like AE or STB. Me wants it
Yes, I did kill Archduke Ferdinand. I used my nova knives.
https://dust514.com/recruit/k3vMnb/
|
Killar-12
The Corporate Raiders Top Men.
2109
|
Posted - 2014.01.28 06:06:00 -
[268] - Quote
843-BANE wrote:Benjamin Ciscko wrote:Would be cool if a corp could host a tourney w/ betting and such through Corp Battles perhaps even a mode with that effect. We did have tournaments with corp battles, they were awesome I remember fighting in them. I'll hold Thunderdome if I don't have to fight the logistical nightmare that is PC
Also I might be interested in running a tourney I've got a decent amount of ISK
A-Teams win Battles B-Teams win Campaigns C-Teams win Wars
|
Marad''er
Ancient Exiles. Renegade Alliance
715
|
Posted - 2014.01.28 07:11:00 -
[269] - Quote
Bump
GôÉGô¥GôÿGô£Gôö > GôÉGô¢Gô¢
Gÿà¿When will dust get better?Gÿà
Forum Warrior LV. 4 | pâÅpéñpâápü»tºüpü«µëôµÆâpéÆF¦ápüúpüªpüäpéï | PSN: I-NINJA-ALL-DAY
|
843-BANE
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
605
|
Posted - 2014.01.28 07:40:00 -
[270] - Quote
Bump
BRING BACK CORP BATTLES
SIGN THE PEITION HERE
|
|
843-BANE
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
605
|
Posted - 2014.01.28 08:57:00 -
[271] - Quote
Another!
BRING BACK CORP BATTLES
SIGN THE PEITION HERE
|
843-BANE
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
606
|
Posted - 2014.01.28 16:25:00 -
[272] - Quote
Aaaaaaaaand another
BRING BACK CORP BATTLES
SIGN THE PEITION HERE
|
843-BANE
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
606
|
Posted - 2014.01.28 17:26:00 -
[273] - Quote
http://i1.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/newsfeed/000/019/267/BUMP-2.jpg
BRING BACK CORP BATTLES
SIGN THE PEITION HERE
|
Derrith Erador
Fatal Absolution Covert Intervention
737
|
Posted - 2014.01.28 17:32:00 -
[274] - Quote
Only 40 signed? Come on people, make alts and sign it already!
beatin' slaves and whippin' knaves All in a days work for an Amarrican!
|
ExtremeG0ggins
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
0
|
Posted - 2014.01.28 17:35:00 -
[275] - Quote
Signed o7 |
843-BANE
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
607
|
Posted - 2014.01.28 17:44:00 -
[276] - Quote
Thanks boys!
BRING BACK CORP BATTLES
SIGN THE PEITION HERE
|
843-BANE
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
607
|
Posted - 2014.01.28 17:44:00 -
[277] - Quote
Derrith Erador wrote:Only 40 signed? Come on people, make alts and sign it already!
Lmao, well the 88 likes on the OP speak even louder tbh.
BRING BACK CORP BATTLES
SIGN THE PEITION HERE
|
Jenova Rhapsodos
Fatal Absolution Covert Intervention
143
|
Posted - 2014.01.28 18:36:00 -
[278] - Quote
843-BANE wrote:Thanks boys!
Hey man, I'm sure at least one of your likes is from ladyfolk. |
843-BANE
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
607
|
Posted - 2014.01.28 18:38:00 -
[279] - Quote
Jenova Rhapsodos wrote:843-BANE wrote:Thanks boys! Hey man, I'm sure at least one of your likes is from ladyfolk.
I meant thanks for the last two bumps, however in light of that:
Many thanks to all the supporting ladyfolk \o/
BRING BACK CORP BATTLES
SIGN THE PEITION HERE
|
Derrith Erador
Fatal Absolution Covert Intervention
740
|
Posted - 2014.01.28 19:38:00 -
[280] - Quote
843-BANE wrote:Jenova Rhapsodos wrote:843-BANE wrote:Thanks boys! Hey man, I'm sure at least one of your likes is from ladyfolk. I meant thanks for the last two bumps, however in light of that: Many thanks to all the supporting ladyfolk \o/ Yeah, you're supposed to be euro, which means all the women should love you
beatin' slaves and whippin' knaves All in a days work for an Amarrican!
|
|
Embry Laughton
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
9
|
Posted - 2014.01.28 19:57:00 -
[281] - Quote
Signed for hodor |
843-BANE
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
608
|
Posted - 2014.01.28 20:17:00 -
[282] - Quote
Derrith Erador wrote:843-BANE wrote:Jenova Rhapsodos wrote:843-BANE wrote:Thanks boys! Hey man, I'm sure at least one of your likes is from ladyfolk. I meant thanks for the last two bumps, however in light of that: Many thanks to all the supporting ladyfolk \o/ Yeah, you're supposed to be euro, which means all the women should love you
Yeeeeeeeeeeah buddy. ._.
BRING BACK CORP BATTLES
SIGN THE PEITION HERE
|
843-BANE
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
610
|
Posted - 2014.01.28 23:53:00 -
[283] - Quote
Bump :)))))
BRING BACK CORP BATTLES
SIGN THE PEITION HERE
|
Marad''er
Ancient Exiles. Renegade Alliance
722
|
Posted - 2014.01.29 00:00:00 -
[284] - Quote
Bumpity
GôÉGô¥GôÿGô£Gôö > GôÉGô¢Gô¢
Gÿà¿When will dust get better?Gÿà
Forum Warrior LV. 4 | pâÅpéñpâápü»tºüpü«µëôµÆâpéÆF¦ápüúpüªpüäpéï | PSN: I-NINJA-ALL-DAY
|
safura trotsky
Kill Mode Activated Public Disorder.
1
|
Posted - 2014.01.29 00:25:00 -
[285] - Quote
Signed :) |
Numinacer
KNIGHTZ OF THE ROUND Legacy Rising
21
|
Posted - 2014.01.29 01:05:00 -
[286] - Quote
Bimitty minny bump. Bummidy bumpy bip. |
Marad''er
Ancient Exiles. Renegade Alliance
727
|
Posted - 2014.01.29 05:27:00 -
[287] - Quote
Bump
GôÉGô¥GôÿGô£Gôö > GôÉGô¢Gô¢
Gÿà¿When will dust get better?Gÿà
Forum Warrior LV. 4 | pâÅpéñpâápü»tºüpü«µëôµÆâpéÆF¦ápüúpüªpüäpéï | PSN: I-NINJA-ALL-DAY
|
843-BANE
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
613
|
Posted - 2014.01.29 07:57:00 -
[288] - Quote
Bomp
BRING BACK CORP BATTLES
SIGN THE PEITION HERE
|
Iron Wolf Saber
Den of Swords
12755
|
Posted - 2014.01.29 08:54:00 -
[289] - Quote
Darken-Soul wrote:Everyone wants this except CCP. why not?
The old system spun up battles that were for the most part empty and this costs money. Now having both sides agree would cut down on it maybe, there is no guarantee you can get or force one side to show up at all.
To quote goonswarm tactics
"Make the other guy lose the will to fight."
In the most trolltastic way would be to issue a bunch of 'friendly matches and just not show up.
CPM 0 Secretary
Omni-Soldier, Forum Warrior, Annoying Artist
\\= Advanced Caldari Assault // Unlocked
|
843-BANE
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
613
|
Posted - 2014.01.29 13:07:00 -
[290] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Darken-Soul wrote:Everyone wants this except CCP. why not? The old system spun up battles that were for the most part empty and this costs money. Now having both sides agree would cut down on it maybe, there is no guarantee you can get or force one side to show up at all. To quote goonswarm tactics "Make the other guy lose the will to fight." In the most trolltastic way would be to issue a bunch of 'friendly matches and just not show up.
What?? I'm sorry I'm sure you're making sense but I am utterly confused.
People no show for PCs. People lock districts and glitch themselves ISK in PC. PC disables our ability to select when we want to fight. PC disables small corporations from competitive gameplay. PC disables corporations ability to have 'friendly' battles that aren't costly unless both are land owners PC ENABLES corporations to abuse mechanics such as timers (Nyain San) to hold inordinate amounts of land with no arguments, gaining unfathomable amounts of ISK. PC encourages players to abuse mechanics in-game (Arirana and the melee glitch, love you though Ari <3) in order to gain land and ISK.
And on top of that, PC is heavily laggy and is ripe with disconnections. It burns out players and has cost CCP hundreds upon hundreds of customers because the only form of competitive gameplay is utterly broken and soul crushing. Sure, it's good for a few. But that's just it, a few.
CCP I'm sure is aware of their broken system and I'm SURE is fast trying to fix it. But regardless if it gets fixed or not players NEED an alternative so they can actually have fun, god forbid.
I know most corporations can't even afford 1 PC a week, and when they do they'll get smashed by the 400 or so clones that the enemy hold.
I appreciate a CPM finally replying, but I very much doubt you can deny corp battles do not need to return. They were fun, easy, simple and competitive. Corporations would HONESTLY fight eachother because it was all about the ego and who's better, not who can farm the most god damn virtual money. Corp battles were fun and were really a drive to be better. PC just crushes the soul of low, and even intermediate corporations. Take BurgezzE.T.F for example, we REFUSE to lock districts, we REFUSE to break the mechanics and we REFUSE to glitch ISK, however we are punished for that because we get spammed by corporations like Nyain San (respect to them) who are tactically more rehearsed and servers between us create game-breaking lag.
I won't stand for anything less than a real answer from CCP. No excuses.
NB: Any corporations or people used as examples please take no offence, I merely need to prove point via evidence.
BRING BACK CORP BATTLES
SIGN THE PEITION HERE
|
|
Jenova Rhapsodos
Fatal Absolution Covert Intervention
143
|
Posted - 2014.01.29 13:40:00 -
[291] - Quote
You tell 'em Bane! |
Imp Smash
Black Phoenix Mercenaries Legacy Rising
201
|
Posted - 2014.01.29 14:36:00 -
[292] - Quote
Signed.
I don't think it'll kill PC. I think, if anything, it'll promote PC. |
NAV HIV
The Generals General Tso's Alliance
919
|
Posted - 2014.01.29 15:27:00 -
[293] - Quote
BUMP ! |
843-BANE
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
615
|
Posted - 2014.01.29 15:30:00 -
[294] - Quote
YEAH
BRING BACK CORP BATTLES
SIGN THE PEITION HERE
|
RydogV
Shadow Company HQ
651
|
Posted - 2014.01.29 15:32:00 -
[295] - Quote
I would like to see this. I am pretty sure there was talk of Arena fighting coming back at some point. Like everything now in Dust it is just a matter of when.
In addition, I would also like to see smaller Corps get the opportunity to participate in PC. With smaller Districts and 8v8 matches. Don't get me wrong, I want the bigger Corps to get their bigger battles too, whatever those end up being. I am just saying, EVE Online has a lot of variety for a lot of different organizations, big or small. We should to. |
843-BANE
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
615
|
Posted - 2014.01.29 15:42:00 -
[296] - Quote
RydogV wrote:I would like to see this. I am pretty sure there was talk of Arena fighting coming back at some point. Like everything now in Dust it is just a matter of when.
In addition, I would also like to see smaller Corps get the opportunity to participate in PC. With smaller Districts and 8v8 matches. Don't get me wrong, I want the bigger Corps to get their bigger battles too, whatever those end up being. I am just saying, EVE Online has a lot of variety for a lot of different organizations, big or small. We should to.
That's exactly why I don't want any 'Road map' crap. CCP has hundreds of awesome ideas but THIS right here is possible in the now. They have the data for it, it's already existed for god's sake.
BRING BACK CORP BATTLES
SIGN THE PEITION HERE
|
John Demonsbane
Unorganized Ninja Infantry Tactics League of Infamy
1764
|
Posted - 2014.01.29 15:58:00 -
[297] - Quote
Signed.
To IWS: Why not make some sort of "wager" or "pot" for the battle, I know some corps have so much isk they wouldn't care, but it might at least try to eliminate skipped matches. Plus, for us smaller corps that have talented players but limited resources and zero chance of actually holding a district, it gives us a competitive outlet where we can take on the "big boys" without having the poor quality of the blueberries actually decide the outcome of the match.
(sorry if any of this has been mentioned before, 15 pages is a lot to read)
"The line between disorder and order lies in logistics" -Sun Tzu
Forum Warrior lv.1
Amarr victor!
|
Varjac Theobroma Montenegro
Omega Elite Mercs INC.
95
|
Posted - 2014.01.29 16:00:00 -
[298] - Quote
Signed +1
FAME
|
Draxus Prime
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
2797
|
Posted - 2014.01.29 16:18:00 -
[299] - Quote
a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Give Corp Battles a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ Giv...
"The human brain named itself... :o" -Draxus Prime
Closed Beta Vet
Nova Knife Proficeiney 5 \o/
|
Draxus Prime
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
2797
|
Posted - 2014.01.29 16:19:00 -
[300] - Quote
like my art?
"The human brain named itself... :o" -Draxus Prime
Closed Beta Vet
Nova Knife Proficeiney 5 \o/
|
|
843-BANE
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
632
|
Posted - 2014.01.29 17:30:00 -
[301] - Quote
Bump
BRING BACK CORP BATTLES
SIGN THE PEITION HERE
|
Patrick57
Fatal Absolution Covert Intervention
4401
|
Posted - 2014.01.29 17:41:00 -
[302] - Quote
bump
bump
bump
bump
Winner of at least 11 King ThunderBolt hate videos :D
|
843-BANE
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
632
|
Posted - 2014.01.29 17:42:00 -
[303] - Quote
Interesting debate going on here regarding corp battles https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=1778767#post1778767
BRING BACK CORP BATTLES
SIGN THE PEITION HERE
|
843-BANE
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
632
|
Posted - 2014.01.29 18:13:00 -
[304] - Quote
Bump
BRING BACK CORP BATTLES
SIGN THE PEITION HERE
|
Levithunder
152
|
Posted - 2014.01.29 18:50:00 -
[305] - Quote
We will R.A.P.E ccp until they give us what we demand. GÇóRally GÇóAggressively GÇóPressure GÇóEnabled
(-í° -£-û -í°) against my adversaries.
|
Zene Ren
Bullet Cluster Legacy Rising
44
|
Posted - 2014.01.29 18:59:00 -
[306] - Quote
just reposting this from my reply in general and a bump ofc!
+1 for corp battles +1 for ISK free no reward corp battles with the only reward being the corp standings and +1 for Eve/Dust deeper integration
Balance is the key to achieve knowledge and understanding
|
Levithunder
152
|
Posted - 2014.01.29 19:02:00 -
[307] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Darken-Soul wrote:Everyone wants this except CCP. why not? The old system spun up battles that were for the most part empty and this costs money. Now having both sides agree would cut down on it maybe, there is no guarantee you can get or force one side to show up at all. To quote goonswarm tactics "Make the other guy lose the will to fight." In the most trolltastic way would be to issue a bunch of 'friendly matches and just not show up. So what does ccp do? They replaced the old game mode with a broken new one? They could've fixed corperate contracts simply by if no one accepted your contract you would get your isk back and the contract had to be accepted in a hour, PROBLEM SOLVED who made you CPM instead of fixing problems you throw them out and make new problems then you give the community headaches.
(-í° -£-û -í°) against my adversaries.
|
Levithunder
155
|
Posted - 2014.01.29 19:10:00 -
[308] - Quote
Btw ccp you owe me a cookie! I was promised a cookie after open beta ! I will have my revenge!
(-í° -£-û -í°) against my adversaries.
|
CrotchGrab 360
The Men In The Mirror
1409
|
Posted - 2014.01.29 19:11:00 -
[309] - Quote
No blue tag huh?
I might create another corp and fight each other on 2 PS3s, then I get to run around an empty map... oh wait!
DUST VIDEOS
|
843-BANE
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
636
|
Posted - 2014.01.29 19:14:00 -
[310] - Quote
More and more people agreeing each and every day.
DAY 8: Still no word from CCP.
BRING BACK CORP BATTLES
SIGN THE PEITION HERE
|
|
Levithunder
155
|
Posted - 2014.01.29 19:17:00 -
[311] - Quote
Nothing Certain wrote:Levithunder wrote:CCP you have two choices:
-bring back corp battles
Or
-fix PC to we're its like 5,000,000 isk for a clone pack and a district only generates 1,000,000isk daily Make it so bigger corps are like "hey we don't constantly wan't to defend all these districs because its not worth alot " So people "share" and if the income daily was reduced by 90% it would stil be high stakes battles if you loose you don't get anything:)
**everyday you wait ccp the more money you let flow into dust and eventally all that money will break the game** PS WE ARE TALKING HUNDREDS OF BILLIONS NOT MILLIONS! CCP learned economics from Zimbabwe, we have hyperinflation and perverse incentives. I like the idea of corp battles, bring them back. Oh, and END THE FED They learned economics from a hamster ? I had my calculator out the first day of PC saw that there was 250 districts times about 10 million a day made by molden and was like "OH DEAR GOD LOOK AT ALL THOSE ZEROS!" Folks that's what happens when a hamster is doing the math, no wonder eve took so long to become a decent game the hamsters had to evolve hands instead of having paws.
(-í° -£-û -í°) against my adversaries.
|
843-BANE
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
641
|
Posted - 2014.01.29 19:49:00 -
[312] - Quote
Fun fact:
Out of 250 (I think) districts in Molden Heath, guess how many are online.
200? No
100? No
50? No
25? No
... 10? No
8. 8 districts. Wow. Bring back corp battles.
This is excluding PFC
BRING BACK CORP BATTLES
SIGN THE PEITION HERE
|
Arkena Wyrnspire
Fatal Absolution Covert Intervention
8663
|
Posted - 2014.01.29 19:58:00 -
[313] - Quote
843-BANE wrote:Fun fact:
Out of 250 (I think) districts in Molden Heath, guess how many are online.
200? No
100? No
50? No
25? No
... 10? No
8. 8 districts. Wow. Bring back corp battles.
This is excluding PFC
GG CCP, GG
ZATARA CARRIES US ALL
Lenin of the glorious armoured revolution
MAG Raven
|
843-BANE
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
642
|
Posted - 2014.01.29 20:14:00 -
[314] - Quote
CCP HAVE COMMENTED. WITNESS.
https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=1779432#post1779432
THIS.
All I get is a locked thread.
BRING BACK CORP BATTLES
SIGN THE PEITION HERE
|
Hawkin P
Molon Labe. Public Disorder.
320
|
Posted - 2014.01.29 20:29:00 -
[315] - Quote
I want corp battles back. I believe one of the CPM's made me a promise, in the forums last summer, that they would return. Still waiting. |
Iron Wolf Saber
Den of Swords
12763
|
Posted - 2014.01.29 20:30:00 -
[316] - Quote
Trust me you're entirely on the wrong way going about this, I am surprised they haven't banned you yet for spamming and cross posting. Its a bad way to get on my radar too. 20 threads on the same subject linking to this one not only does it speak of desperation but a general lack of anything but a bias which for the most part I have come to find out is NOT a community voice at all; instead its the will of one person trying to get his agenda no matter how well educated or uneducated on the subject is pressed through and making him to look like the big hero.
I do recall though that seemingly everyone forgets the largest complaint of the old systems WAS empty matches. We all know that humans are ultimately risk averse creatures at times.
As someone else pointed out all but 8 districts where self locked today. Imagine 200 battle invites going out today and a similar number of fights only had those 8 show up; changing the methods of which people avoid attacks will not change will never change and as long as people have the ability to not log on you're not going to be able to enforce anything. Massive Fee? Transfer isk... Territory loss? Don't have any. One thing you should take note of players is that the larger players are FAR more intelligent than you give them credit for.
The other issue that lead to our current system was burn out. How many big corps dropped entirely off the radar before pc got implemented? quite a few back in those days and lot of these folks don't play; or don't even bother with PC anymore.
As for the feature itself.
Don't expect it to 'come back' as it cannot co-exist with current system. Thus a new system (arena mode as some folks mentioned here) would be needed and quite frankly we're not in a position for that feature yet. Its on the todo list for sure but its lower on the list versus a crap ton of other things that must get done and quite frankly I cannot be bothered to bring this back now I got a new fire to put out.
CPM 0 Secretary
Omni-Soldier, Forum Warrior, Annoying Artist
\\= Advanced Caldari Assault // Unlocked
|
843-BANE
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
645
|
Posted - 2014.01.29 20:43:00 -
[317] - Quote
Quote:Trust me you're entirely on the wrong way going about this, I am surprised they haven't banned you yet for spamming and cross posting. Its a bad way to get on my radar too. 20 threads on the same subject linking to this one not only does it speak of desperation but a general lack of anything but a bias which for the most part I have come to find out is NOT a community voice at all; instead its the will of one person trying to get his agenda no matter how well educated or uneducated on the subject is pressed through and making him to look like the big hero.
Gone the entirely wrong way about it? Yep. I've been a troll, a cross-spammer and whatever else you might wish to label me with. CLEARLY that is what it takes to squeeze a god damn real answer out of you, the CPM or CCP. My bias is sourced from evidence and fact, not least of which is that a clear amount of people thinking along the same wavelength. You say I'm uneducated on the subject, perhaps I am? So why don't you or CCP EDUCATE me and everyone else so that we don't have to resort to this kind of thing to get some kind of god damn answer.
Quote:I do recall though that seemingly everyone forgets the largest complaint of the old systems WAS empty matches. We all know that humans are ultimately risk averse creatures at times.
I, personally, don't recall that. And you bring that up as if it is a far larger issue than it is now? There are still no-shows (Believe that or not) coupled with a multitude of other issues that I'd take a good old corp battle over.
Quote:As someone else pointed out all but 8 districts where self locked today. Imagine 200 battle invites going out today and a similar number of fights only had those 8 show up; changing the methods of which people avoid attacks will not change will never change and as long as people have the ability to not log on you're not going to be able to enforce anything. Massive Fee? Transfer isk... Territory loss? Don't have any. One thing you should take note of players is that the larger players are FAR more intelligent than you give them credit for.
Have the ability to not log on... what? What are you even talking about? You do realise people aren't locking district for the lulz they're doing it to save their land and save their ISK. You realise that in Corporation battles between corporations that's not a problem because there isn't an inordinate amount to lose?
Quote: The other issue that lead to our current system was burn out. How many big corps dropped entirely off the radar before pc got implemented? quite a few back in those days and lot of these folks don't play; or don't even bother with PC anymore.
As for the feature itself.
Many people backed out before PC, this is true. However almost all of those people (That I knew) came back for PC and not soon after packed their bags. Top that off with a whole new rosters of people who leave.
Quote:Don't expect it to 'come back' as it cannot co-exist with current system. Thus a new system (arena mode as some folks mentioned here) would be needed and quite frankly we're not in a position for that feature yet. Its on the todo list for sure but its lower on the list versus a crap ton of other things that must get done and quite frankly I cannot be bothered to bring this back now I got a new fire to put out.
You tell me MY attitude is wrong, you talk down to me. Perhaps your attitude is wrong, IWS, as it often is. You talk to me as if I've done the unthinkable when all I've done reality is gone to the length to get the information I and the rest of the community want. Is that such a crime?
FYI: I don't give a damn about getting on your radar the 'bad way'.
BRING BACK CORP BATTLES
SIGN THE PEITION HERE
|
BobThe 844-1 CakeMan
Murder Cakes Of Doom
1559
|
Posted - 2014.01.29 20:57:00 -
[318] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Trust me you're entirely on the wrong way going about this, I am surprised they haven't banned you yet for spamming and cross posting. Its a bad way to get on my radar too. 20 threads on the same subject linking to this one not only does it speak of desperation but a general lack of anything but a bias which for the most part I have come to find out is NOT a community voice at all; instead its the will of one person trying to get his agenda no matter how well educated or uneducated on the subject is pressed through and making him to look like the big hero. I do recall though that seemingly everyone forgets the largest complaint of the old systems WAS empty matches. We all know that humans are ultimately risk averse creatures at times. As someone else pointed out all but 8 districts where self locked today. Imagine 200 battle invites going out today and a similar number of fights only had those 8 show up; changing the methods of which people avoid attacks will not change will never change and as long as people have the ability to not log on you're not going to be able to enforce anything. Massive Fee? Transfer isk... Territory loss? Don't have any. One thing you should take note of players is that the larger players are FAR more intelligent than you give them credit for. The other issue that lead to our current system was burn out. How many big corps dropped entirely off the radar before pc got implemented? quite a few back in those days and lot of these folks don't play; or don't even bother with PC anymore. As for the feature itself. Don't expect it to 'come back' as it cannot co-exist with current system. Thus a new system (arena mode as some folks mentioned here) would be needed and quite frankly we're not in a position for that feature yet. Its on the todo list for sure but its lower on the list versus a crap ton of other things that must get done and quite frankly I cannot be bothered to bring this back now I got a new fire to put out. I am not saying you're a bad person or the intention is bad or the feature wanted is bad. What I am saying though there are better ways to build up an case, argument, or platform, present it, and make it very hard for ccp to deny its existence of need for it or a change closer to it. Shotgunning it from the hip wont give you the best results, gotta aim for the heart in one strike. O i see but spaming and petitions work. it's a proven fact. If your entire community doesn't like something and want something changed it will happen or else they will leave.
Plus it took spaming the carp out of threads to change anything in this game. And i mean anything. Flaylocks, Missiles, Contact nades. all of these things were OP and took months of spamming threads to get them changed.
Main - BobThe843CakeMan
Ringing for PC for a price, msg for details.
Prices are based on who ur facing and how i feel.
|
Terram Nenokal
Molon Labe. Public Disorder.
297
|
Posted - 2014.01.29 21:02:00 -
[319] - Quote
IWS, your posts seem to imply you rarely play the game, at least at a level where your opinions as a player are applicable. Nothing you've said makes any sense in the context of corp battles or PC.
A "no show" isn't an issue with corp battles, since they are consensual fights with zero rewards. A "no show" might have been an issue when all we had was corp battles, but now we have other game modes.
It's simply an option to initiate a private fight with no effect on the game's systems besides sinking ISK, which is always a good thing. There a lot of great reasons to bring it back:
-Training -Video making -Thunderdomes -Racing -Exploring maps/sockets -Tournaments -Testing features and bugs
So yeah, +1 from me. Bring it back.
Loving to hate and hating to love Dust 514 since May 2012
|
Arkena Wyrnspire
Fatal Absolution Covert Intervention
8667
|
Posted - 2014.01.29 21:10:00 -
[320] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:I do recall though that seemingly everyone forgets the largest complaint of the old systems WAS empty matches. We all know that humans are ultimately risk averse creatures at times. As someone else pointed out all but 8 districts where self locked today. Imagine 200 battle invites going out today and a similar number of fights only had those 8 show up; changing the methods of which people avoid attacks will not change will never change and as long as people have the ability to not log on you're not going to be able to enforce anything. Massive Fee? Transfer isk... Territory loss? Don't have any. One thing you should take note of players is that the larger players are FAR more intelligent than you give them credit for. Those districts are presently locked out of protest at the terrible system that is currently implemented. Additionally, the risk factor in PC is vastly higher than in corp battles - nobody gives a damn about a few hundred thousand ISK. People do care about tens/hundreds of millions of isk.
This is not a massive, super complex system. This is not about territory or financial gain. This is about people being able to have fun matches where both sides simply want to have fun. This is not suggested as a replacement PC - this is suggested as a simple mechanism by which people can have low-risk fights.
Iron Wolf Saber wrote: Don't expect it to 'come back' as it cannot co-exist with current system. Thus a new system (arena mode as some folks mentioned here) would be needed and quite frankly we're not in a position for that feature yet. Its on the todo list for sure but its lower on the list versus a crap ton of other things that must get done and quite frankly I cannot be bothered to bring this back now I got a new fire to put out.
Why can't it co-exist with the current system? Why aren't we in a position for an arena mode? Dust is desperately in need of actual content.
Iron Wolf Saber wrote: Trust me you're entirely on the wrong way going about this, I am surprised they haven't banned you yet for spamming and cross posting. Its a bad way to get on my radar too. 20 threads on the same subject linking to this one not only does it speak of desperation but a general lack of anything but a bias which for the most part I have come to find out is NOT a community voice at all; instead its the will of one person trying to get his agenda no matter how well educated or uneducated on the subject is pressed through and making him to look like the big hero.
Frankly, if 843-BANE was banned for this I would walk away from an apparently hopeless company and never look back. That it could even be a possibility that someone would get banned for championing a well-supported cause for no reason other than 'They posted a bit too much' is disgusting and I'm appalled that this is apparently even a possibility.
And what exactly would he get out of 'looking like a big hero'? Forum likes? You know as well as I do how worthless those are. This is not about Bane looking like a 'hero'. This is about a feature that was removed that never should have been, which offered a bridge between PC and pubs/FW and most importantly fun.
He's pushing an agenda. Yes. This is obvious. This is an agenda for fun. There are huge numbers of people in corps who can't play PC but who would love to participate in some solid fights. Remember the squad cup? There were so many people who didn't expect to win, but as I went through channels they were humming with interest. Not because they wanted to win shinies and bragging rights, but because they wanted to have competitive fights without having to drop vast sums of ISK on the broken feature that is PC.
The very existence of the squad cup tells me that it would not take much effort to implement an arena mode. This is not something buried in ancient, broken code. This is something that was brought up a couple of months ago.
I would be unsurprised if Bane took offence at this post. A popular request, one which many people would love - and you come here and say things like:
Iron Wolf Saber wrote: I am surprised they haven't banned you yet for spamming and cross posting. Its a bad way to get on my radar too.
Players look to you for guidance and information because you have a special role as a go-between for CCP and the players, as CCP barely say a word on these forums. To me, it's astonishing that you wander into threads and post this kind of thing. Absolutely astonishing.
ZATARA CARRIES US ALL
Lenin of the glorious armoured revolution
MAG Raven
|
|
Sole Fenychs
Sinq Laison Gendarmes Gallente Federation
129
|
Posted - 2014.01.29 21:11:00 -
[321] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote: -Snip-
Wait, are you really arguing that the ability for corps to do competitive play with no strings attached would somehow cause them to burn out?
The ability for friendly matches and to mess around with allied corps is something that would strengthen the community.
I don't know about PC, as I'm not involved with that stuff, but generally this would be one of the most basic features to have in an FPS... Well, at least it was about ten years ago.
Imagine the possibilities. Allied corps could work together on 0 ISK matches to create flight school training camps for their new players. All the lost dropships would be ISK sinks. People could be testing the changes of new patches in a controlled environment, research bugs on their own and set up awesome scenarios. What is there not to like? The kind of nonsense scenarios that this opens up are perfect for players that feel burnt out on DUST. It adds a sense of community and reduces frustration with the game.
Edit: I also forgot to mention the obvious thing. Tournaments |
Cat Merc
Ahrendee Mercenaries EoN.
6062
|
Posted - 2014.01.29 21:16:00 -
[322] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Trust me you're entirely on the wrong way going about this, I am surprised they haven't banned you yet for spamming and cross posting. Its a bad way to get on my radar too. 20 threads on the same subject linking to this one not only does it speak of desperation but a general lack of anything but a bias which for the most part I have come to find out is NOT a community voice at all; instead its the will of one person trying to get his agenda no matter how well educated or uneducated on the subject is pressed through and making him to look like the big hero. I do recall though that seemingly everyone forgets the largest complaint of the old systems WAS empty matches. We all know that humans are ultimately risk averse creatures at times. As someone else pointed out all but 8 districts where self locked today. Imagine 200 battle invites going out today and a similar number of fights only had those 8 show up; changing the methods of which people avoid attacks will not change will never change and as long as people have the ability to not log on you're not going to be able to enforce anything. Massive Fee? Transfer isk... Territory loss? Don't have any. One thing you should take note of players is that the larger players are FAR more intelligent than you give them credit for. The other issue that lead to our current system was burn out. How many big corps dropped entirely off the radar before pc got implemented? quite a few back in those days and lot of these folks don't play; or don't even bother with PC anymore. As for the feature itself. Don't expect it to 'come back' as it cannot co-exist with current system. Thus a new system (arena mode as some folks mentioned here) would be needed and quite frankly we're not in a position for that feature yet. Its on the todo list for sure but its lower on the list versus a crap ton of other things that must get done and quite frankly I cannot be bothered to bring this back now I got a new fire to put out. I am not saying you're a bad person or the intention is bad or the feature wanted is bad. What I am saying though there are better ways to build up an case, argument, or platform, present it, and make it very hard for ccp to deny its existence of need for it or a change closer to it. Shotgunning it from the hip wont give you the best results, gotta aim for the heart in one strike. I have discovered a bad IWS post.
Huzzah
Shield regeneration bonus for Gallente Assault is about as useful as Sharpshooter for Nova Knives.
Tuna > Tacos
|
Iron Wolf Saber
Den of Swords
12762
|
Posted - 2014.01.29 21:25:00 -
[323] - Quote
Sole Fenychs wrote:Iron Wolf Saber wrote: -Snip-
Wait, are you really arguing that the ability for corps to do competitive play with no strings attached would somehow cause them to burn out?
Learn to read.
CPM 0 Secretary
Omni-Soldier, Forum Warrior, Annoying Artist
\\= Advanced Caldari Assault // Unlocked
|
843-BANE
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
657
|
Posted - 2014.01.29 21:26:00 -
[324] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Sole Fenychs wrote:Iron Wolf Saber wrote: -Snip-
Wait, are you really arguing that the ability for corps to do competitive play with no strings attached would somehow cause them to burn out? Learn to read.
Our CPM everyone. Round of applause.
BRING BACK CORP BATTLES
SIGN THE PEITION HERE
|
Iron Wolf Saber
Den of Swords
12762
|
Posted - 2014.01.29 21:28:00 -
[325] - Quote
Terram Nenokal wrote:IWS, your posts seem to imply you rarely play the game, at least at a level where your opinions as a player are applicable. Nothing you've said makes any sense in the context of corp battles or PC.
A "no show" isn't an issue with corp battles, since they are consensual fights with zero rewards. A "no show" might have been an issue when all we had was corp battles, but now we have other game modes.
It's simply an option to initiate a private fight with no effect on the game's systems besides sinking ISK, which is always a good thing. There a lot of great reasons to bring it back:
-Training -Video making -Thunderdomes -Racing -Exploring maps/sockets -Tournaments -Testing features and bugs
So yeah, +1 from me. Bring it back.
I have participated in all of those actions though. We don't need the OLD system back we need a NEW system instead.
CPM 0 Secretary
Omni-Soldier, Forum Warrior, Annoying Artist
\\= Advanced Caldari Assault // Unlocked
|
Arkena Wyrnspire
Fatal Absolution Covert Intervention
8670
|
Posted - 2014.01.29 21:30:00 -
[326] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Terram Nenokal wrote:IWS, your posts seem to imply you rarely play the game, at least at a level where your opinions as a player are applicable. Nothing you've said makes any sense in the context of corp battles or PC.
A "no show" isn't an issue with corp battles, since they are consensual fights with zero rewards. A "no show" might have been an issue when all we had was corp battles, but now we have other game modes.
It's simply an option to initiate a private fight with no effect on the game's systems besides sinking ISK, which is always a good thing. There a lot of great reasons to bring it back:
-Training -Video making -Thunderdomes -Racing -Exploring maps/sockets -Tournaments -Testing features and bugs
So yeah, +1 from me. Bring it back. I have participated in all of those actions though. We don't need the OLD system back we need a NEW system instead.
Sure, you've participated in that. Maybe you didn't like something. But there are a hell of a lot of people who haven't, a hell of a lot of whom would very much like to have the ability to do these things.
ZATARA CARRIES US ALL
Lenin of the glorious armoured revolution
MAG Raven
|
843-BANE
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
658
|
Posted - 2014.01.29 21:39:00 -
[327] - Quote
Arkena Wyrnspire wrote:Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Terram Nenokal wrote:IWS, your posts seem to imply you rarely play the game, at least at a level where your opinions as a player are applicable. Nothing you've said makes any sense in the context of corp battles or PC.
A "no show" isn't an issue with corp battles, since they are consensual fights with zero rewards. A "no show" might have been an issue when all we had was corp battles, but now we have other game modes.
It's simply an option to initiate a private fight with no effect on the game's systems besides sinking ISK, which is always a good thing. There a lot of great reasons to bring it back:
-Training -Video making -Thunderdomes -Racing -Exploring maps/sockets -Tournaments -Testing features and bugs
So yeah, +1 from me. Bring it back. I have participated in all of those actions though. We don't need the OLD system back we need a NEW system instead. Sure, you've participated in that. Maybe you didn't like something. But there are a hell of a lot of people who haven't, a hell of a lot of whom would very much like to have the ability to do these things.
It's very easy for us all to talk about 'Fixing PC' but even if fixed, I doubt very much it'll enable the little guys to fight competitively.
BRING BACK CORP BATTLES
SIGN THE PEITION HERE
|
843-BANE
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
662
|
Posted - 2014.01.29 22:02:00 -
[328] - Quote
I just noticed IWS decided to edit his post, in order to save himself from his aggressive approach. I know I may seem like an ass picking apart everything you say, IWS, and perhaps I am. However I do believe this also deserves a comment.
Quote:I am not saying you're a bad person or the intention is bad or the feature wanted is bad.
What I am saying though there are better ways to build up an case, argument, or platform, present it, and make it very hard for ccp to deny its existence of need for it or a change closer to it. Shotgunning it from the hip wont give you the best results, gotta aim for the heart in one strike.
There are better ways to build up a case? Hang on, let me check something.
...
Yep, this is the Feedback/requests forum. This is the area designed by CCP for us to contribute feedback, and hence this is where the thread is.
Make it very hard for CCP to deny? Isn't that what I've been doing? Bumping with several others relentlessly for over a week? I'd say that's us making it impeccably hard to deny.
"Shotgunning it from the hip". Nice phrase. Too bad it doesn't make any sense. My OP is calm collected, and provides evidence, data and suggestion with both quantitative (less so my OP, more following comments) and qualitative information. How am I shotgunning this? Because I created a petition? Because I posted a thread in the feedback section? Because I rallied together a portion of the community?
Perhaps you're now realising that what you said I 'should do' is exactly what I have done, and it's lead to you describing me as 'bias', 'uneducated', and claiming that I've insinuated my peers are unintelligent, which I have not. Does my post warrant such an approach?
BRING BACK CORP BATTLES
SIGN THE PEITION HERE
|
Arkena Wyrnspire
Fatal Absolution Covert Intervention
8673
|
Posted - 2014.01.29 22:08:00 -
[329] - Quote
843-BANE wrote:I just noticed IWS decided to edit his post, in order to save himself from his aggressive approach. I know I may seem like an ass picking apart everything you say, IWS, and perhaps I am. However I do believe this also deserves a comment. Quote:I am not saying you're a bad person or the intention is bad or the feature wanted is bad.
What I am saying though there are better ways to build up an case, argument, or platform, present it, and make it very hard for ccp to deny its existence of need for it or a change closer to it. Shotgunning it from the hip wont give you the best results, gotta aim for the heart in one strike. There are better ways to build up a case? Hang on, let me check something. ... Yep, this is the Feedback/requests forum. This is the area designed by CCP for us to contribute feedback, and hence this is where the thread is. Make it very hard for CCP to deny? Isn't that what I've been doing? Bumping with several others relentlessly for over a week? I'd say that's us making it impeccably hard to deny. "Shotgunning it from the hip". Nice phrase. Too bad it doesn't make any sense. My OP is calm collected, and provides evidence, data and suggestion with both quantitative (less so my OP, more following comments) and qualitative information. How am I shotgunning this? Because I created a petition? Because I posted a thread in the feedback section? Because I rallied together a portion of the community? Perhaps you're now realising that what you said I 'should do' is exactly what I have done, and it's lead to you describing me as 'bias', 'uneducated', and claiming that I've insinuated my peers are unintelligent, which I have not. Does my post warrant such an approach?
You have to be an absolute paragon of virtue, reason and good posting to get a response from CCP on a feedback thread. There are more responses to troll posts in GD than there are to excellent posts in F&R.
Oh, and I must wonder what it takes to get a dev response on a feedback thread. I keep a certain link in my sig because every time I look at it I remember huge community support being met with silence. Over, and over, and over.
ZATARA CARRIES US ALL
Lenin of the glorious armoured revolution
MAG Raven
|
843-BANE
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
663
|
Posted - 2014.01.29 22:19:00 -
[330] - Quote
Arkena Wyrnspire wrote:843-BANE wrote:I just noticed IWS decided to edit his post, in order to save himself from his aggressive approach. I know I may seem like an ass picking apart everything you say, IWS, and perhaps I am. However I do believe this also deserves a comment. Quote:I am not saying you're a bad person or the intention is bad or the feature wanted is bad.
What I am saying though there are better ways to build up an case, argument, or platform, present it, and make it very hard for ccp to deny its existence of need for it or a change closer to it. Shotgunning it from the hip wont give you the best results, gotta aim for the heart in one strike. There are better ways to build up a case? Hang on, let me check something. ... Yep, this is the Feedback/requests forum. This is the area designed by CCP for us to contribute feedback, and hence this is where the thread is. Make it very hard for CCP to deny? Isn't that what I've been doing? Bumping with several others relentlessly for over a week? I'd say that's us making it impeccably hard to deny. "Shotgunning it from the hip". Nice phrase. Too bad it doesn't make any sense. My OP is calm collected, and provides evidence, data and suggestion with both quantitative (less so my OP, more following comments) and qualitative information. How am I shotgunning this? Because I created a petition? Because I posted a thread in the feedback section? Because I rallied together a portion of the community? Perhaps you're now realising that what you said I 'should do' is exactly what I have done, and it's lead to you describing me as 'bias', 'uneducated', and claiming that I've insinuated my peers are unintelligent, which I have not. Does my post warrant such an approach? You have to be an absolute paragon of virtue, reason and good posting to get a response from CCP on a feedback thread. There are more responses to troll posts in GD than there are to excellent posts in F&R. Oh, and I must wonder what it takes to get a dev response on a feedback thread. I keep a certain link in my sig because every time I look at it I remember huge community support being met with silence. Over, and over, and over.
Indeed! We get slated for trying to incur a response, only being told thereafter to follow the appropriate channels in which to do so EVEN though that has already been done. Mind boggling.
BRING BACK CORP BATTLES
SIGN THE PEITION HERE
|
|
KenKaniff69
Fatal Absolution Covert Intervention
1985
|
Posted - 2014.01.29 22:20:00 -
[331] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Darken-Soul wrote:Everyone wants this except CCP. why not? The old system spun up battles that were for the most part empty and this costs money. Now having both sides agree would cut down on it maybe, there is no guarantee you can get or force one side to show up at all. To quote goonswarm tactics "Make the other guy lose the will to fight." In the most trolltastic way would be to issue a bunch of 'friendly matches and just not show up. GTFO with that crap.
This was the funnest thing ever in dust.
No strings attached, simple, complete battles.
The freedom was endless.
Give me a good reason.
We all know you hate the competitive community, so proceed.
So about those vehicle locks...
|
843-BANE
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
663
|
Posted - 2014.01.29 22:54:00 -
[332] - Quote
Bump.
This movement doesn't end here, it doesn't end with the mass PC protest lock, we keep going.
BRING BACK CORP BATTLES
SIGN THE PEITION HERE
|
John Demonsbane
Unorganized Ninja Infantry Tactics League of Infamy
1765
|
Posted - 2014.01.29 23:08:00 -
[333] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote: I have participated in all of those actions though. We don't need the OLD system back we need a NEW system instead.
That argument is pointless, but I'll go with it: Ok, then don't give us the "old" corp battles back, give us the "New and improved corp battle 3000-inator". The point is that the code exists for the old ones so theres no "no, sorry guys would take too long to code, so soonGäó for you" it was used in the old corp battles and the squad cup, so it's there.
So put it in! Give us a simple system where we set up a battle with another corp/alliance, put a wager on it. Don't want to give us any other customization for now? Fine, don't, we can work it out ourselves. Like always, give us the tools and we'll do something with them.
What would be the point of people ducking out? There's nothing to gain by doing so, all the PC districts are locked anyway so it's not like someone is going to pull some brilliant diversion tactic of setting up a corp battle and amazingly take over entire planets while people are sitting in the empty battle. As you said, the big corps are too smart for that. Plus, they have PC anyway, this is for midrange corps to have a competitive outlet!
"The line between disorder and order lies in logistics" -Sun Tzu
Forum Warrior lv.1
Amarr victor!
|
Iron Wolf Saber
Den of Swords
12764
|
Posted - 2014.01.29 23:33:00 -
[334] - Quote
I don't see the point in biting my hand though.
I explained why old system is flawed and lack of admission on your end, unwillingness to work to move forward (where as you want to go backwards) and the type of folks you're attracting to this thread has instantly disarmed my ability to promote bringing this back in front of ccp; so thanks alot.
This case is nearly as dead as trying to bring back skirmish 1.0 back as it was.
Which is why that conversation is now called skirmish 3.0 instead.
CPM 0 Secretary
Omni-Soldier, Forum Warrior, Annoying Artist
\\= Advanced Caldari Assault // Unlocked
|
843-BANE
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
664
|
Posted - 2014.01.29 23:35:00 -
[335] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:I don't see the point in biting my hand though.
I explained why old system is flawed and lack of admission on your end, unwillingness to work to move forward (where as you want to go backwards) and the type of folks you're attracting to this thread has instantly disarmed my ability to promote bringing this back in front of ccp; so thanks alot.
"The types of folks you're attracting to this thread". What, the hell, does that mean? Are you serious? Are you legitimately a CPM? I can't even believe this.
BRING BACK CORP BATTLES
SIGN THE PEITION HERE
|
843-BANE
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
664
|
Posted - 2014.01.29 23:36:00 -
[336] - Quote
Oh and well done, trying to make it look like I'M the reason we won't get corporation battles now, what are you? 7 years old? Jesus H Christ can we get a real CPM to comment please?
BRING BACK CORP BATTLES
SIGN THE PEITION HERE
|
Iron Wolf Saber
Den of Swords
12765
|
Posted - 2014.01.29 23:40:00 -
[337] - Quote
843-BANE wrote:Oh and well done, trying to make it look like I'M the reason we won't get corporation battles now, what are you? 7 years old? Jesus H Christ can we get a real CPM to comment please?
I am certainly not advocating the return of consented challenges on your behalf. If anything it be for the T-Dome guys and CPM Kane and CPM Hans is their champion when it comes to things like that.
CPM 0 Secretary
Omni-Soldier, Forum Warrior, Annoying Artist
\\= Advanced Caldari Assault // Unlocked
|
843-BANE
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
665
|
Posted - 2014.01.29 23:43:00 -
[338] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:843-BANE wrote:Oh and well done, trying to make it look like I'M the reason we won't get corporation battles now, what are you? 7 years old? Jesus H Christ can we get a real CPM to comment please? I am certainly not advocating the return of consented challenges on your behalf. If anything it be for the T-Dome guys and CPM Kane and CPM Hans is their champion when it comes to things like that.
I don't care about you consenting anything on my behalf, you've met my concerns with childish responses and attacks on both me and my peers. Not only have I reported you, but I regard any further comment from you useless and meaningless. Thanks for wasting everyone's time.
BRING BACK CORP BATTLES
SIGN THE PEITION HERE
|
843-BANE
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
665
|
Posted - 2014.01.29 23:49:00 -
[339] - Quote
And with that, I bid everyone goodnight.
Keep fighting the good fight ladies and gentlemen o7
BRING BACK CORP BATTLES
SIGN THE PEITION HERE
|
Iron Wolf Saber
Den of Swords
12765
|
Posted - 2014.01.29 23:51:00 -
[340] - Quote
843-BANE wrote:Iron Wolf Saber wrote:843-BANE wrote:Oh and well done, trying to make it look like I'M the reason we won't get corporation battles now, what are you? 7 years old? Jesus H Christ can we get a real CPM to comment please? I am certainly not advocating the return of consented challenges on your behalf. If anything it be for the T-Dome guys and CPM Kane and CPM Hans is their champion when it comes to things like that. I don't care about you consenting anything on my behalf, you've met my concerns with childish responses and attacks on both me and my peers. Not only have I reported you, but I regard any further comment from you useless and meaningless. Thanks for wasting everyone's time.
And you outright attacked me and I have a pretty good feeling CCP as well if they had responded, the large number of threads you dedicated to this thread indicates such.
Placing yourself on a high chair does not make you immune to me. I mean I find it ironic you played the 'edit' attack card on a post you edited. Flacking your innocence in all the while evading thread locks by the community team.
What next? martyrdom? Purposely getting banned to bring this agenda forward is not exactly the most mature thing to do.
CPM 0 Secretary
Omni-Soldier, Forum Warrior, Annoying Artist
\\= Advanced Caldari Assault // Unlocked
|
|
Jenova Rhapsodos
Fatal Absolution Covert Intervention
147
|
Posted - 2014.01.29 23:52:00 -
[341] - Quote
Bump |
Reign Omega
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
116
|
Posted - 2014.01.30 00:13:00 -
[342] - Quote
I'll start my disorganized post by saying, has it been a year since the CPM was voted in yet? I have seen many occasions where the cpm talks down to the players in nonstandard impersonal topics, it may be time for a change, no offense.
Secondly, you haven't really explained anything regarding the specifics behind why corporate contracts wouldn't work alongside the pc system. Server space/ workload? I don't see how user initiated code is any different than being able to select match types in pub matches, so feel free to enlighten us if you could.
In an environment where player input is the median say in how things are implemented in game, how is it bad for someone to maintain diligence in making sure the issue that had well over 200 responses is brought to the eyes in the sky? I know ccp and the cpm are only human, but when something garners as much positive support as this more should be extended than "stop whining". I see mostly veteran respected players here, marking the mood of your core fans, with a suggestion that is simultaneously a way to keep things fresh, and fair..and also giving smaller corps a chance to taste the spotlight.
In closing, all we are really looking for is at least acknowledgement that this is possible, as it is obviously something wanted. Ccp comments on the most mundane hocus pocus but can't shoot a nod in for this? |
Heinrich Jagerblitzen
D3LTA FORC3
1492
|
Posted - 2014.01.30 00:33:00 -
[343] - Quote
843-BANE wrote:Oh and well done, trying to make it look like I'M the reason we won't get corporation battles now, what are you? 7 years old? Jesus H Christ can we get a real CPM to comment please?
First off, IWS is absolutely a "real CPM" and one of our workhorses on the team, disrespecting him isn't going to impress me, or CCP, or anyone else for that matter. If you're going to lecture about maturity, make sure you're exuding it yourself. Also - I'm not sure how long you've been around these forums, but while IWS has been blessed with the urge to post prolifically, eloquence has never been his strong suit. This is a classic case of players having an absolute meltdown over a series of extremely rational (and truthful) comments about the issue.
The bottom line is this, no one (not the CPM, not CCP) is putting some foot down and refusing to deliver Corp Battles. This whole approachj of "GRAB THE TORCHES, FIRE UP THE PETITION, LETS HAVE A REVOLUTION" is a huge mistaken waste of effort, just as IWS previously said.
Here are the unadulterated facts, scrubbed of hyperbole and emotion:
1.) CCP does not respond to petitions. They have never been a recognized form of getting a feature or change pushed, They're not about to be, and signing and spamming one carries zero weight in terms of actually accomplishing what you want to accomplish.
2.) There is no need to convince either the CPM or CCP that there is plenty broken with PC, and plenty of merit in having pitched battles between corporation. I've personally brainstormed ideas with devs directly and seen interest in offering this type of gameplay in the future, the lack of them coming out and promising to work on this feature tomorrow does not mean that anyone's saying "corp battles will never happen in the future".
3.) CCP is undergoing some heavy internal examination under the leadership of the new EP, they're not ready to discuss the future of Dust at this time, but they will in the not-too-distant future. No, we cannot give you an ETA.
4.) The long-term planning taking place under the new EP will have a lot to do with what major features like this get worked on and in what order.
5.) CCP is working on dropsuits and weapons and balancing in the meantime, because work must continue, and this is low-hanging fruit they can manage without needing the long-term plans finalized yet. Work on dropsuits and balances does NOT indicate that this is the most important aspect of the game, only one that is manageable independent of the larger picture, which is still being painted.
6.) Pretending that there's some battle here between the will of the players and the will of CCP or the CPM is pointless and harmful, it wastes other community member's energy by leading them into a confrontation that is both unnecessary and only going to lessen your credibility as someone trying to make positive change.
So by all means, continue to berate IWS for sharing the truth, which is that Corp Contracts are not going to magically appear in 1.8 because you made a petition and got a bunch of people angry at a perceived slight. Corp contracts will also not return in their previous form, certainly not tied to Faction Warfare and certainly not without some of the design issues addressed in the process. Will they return in some form, some day? I certainly hope so, as do all of the rest of the CPM. No one's fighting the -idea- of corp contracts, all IWS is trying to explain is that stamping our feet and bumping threads is not going to be the way this gets implemented.
If any of MY statement above is factually untrue (such as devs EXPLICITLY declaring they will not be re-implementing a corp contract system or providing corps freedom to create their own content at districts) , feel free to correct me here. Otherwise, I'm more than happy to dowse the torches and send everyone home from the riot party with the comfortable knowledge that there's no need to obnoxiously bump threads and lead a faux revolution just to "be heard". You've been heard by the CPM, you've been heard by CCP, everyone knows PC is broke and corp contracts were more fun, and all there is left to do is to chill for a bit until the new EP can share with you his plan for the future.
....and THAN you can go grab your pitchforks again if don't hear what you're looking for. Fair enough? |
Killar-12
The Corporate Raiders Top Men.
2123
|
Posted - 2014.01.30 00:43:00 -
[344] - Quote
Bravo to hans... might be the cold meds but you toss us any two of these in the next build and you'll get a great response
PvE CBs Heavily Reworked academy/tutorial A plan (nothing concrete but at the pace we're going that plan will look badass) EWAR Racial Vehicles (and Turrets) Racial Heavy Weapons Promise of Release on PS4 in 2014-2015 (hell even 2016 if we get a year)
A-Teams win Battles B-Teams win Campaigns C-Teams win Wars
|
Heinrich Jagerblitzen
D3LTA FORC3
1493
|
Posted - 2014.01.30 00:57:00 -
[345] - Quote
Reign Omega wrote:In closing, all we are really looking for is at least acknowledgement that this is possible, as it is obviously something wanted. Ccp comments on the most mundane hocus pocus but can't shoot a nod in for this?
It's possible, It's wanted, and it's something the CPM will continue to encourage CCP to consider when examining Dust 514's content lineup.
The reason you're not going to hear much from CCP right now is that they are the middle of a very high-level, long-term planning process, and its clear to me that new EP recognizes that in the past promises have been made and features discussed that were never delivered up (or took ages to deliver). This only results in more player rage, and so its absolutely crucial that long-term goals and major feature overhauls are planned out and discussed with the community only after a sober vetting process that prevents the mistakes of the past (overpromise, underdeliver) from happening all over again under the new boss.
What the majority of petitioners want in this thread right now is for CCP to come out and say "this is great, we'll do this next".....which would be about as irresponsible as getting on stage at FanFest and making a bunch of claims about what was coming in the year that was in no way realistic or deliverable based on the rate the studio was able to churn out content. I think its completely healthy for CCP to reserve comment on a feature or its future until they've discussed it internally, assessed what it would take to implement, and had a realistic idea of if/when it could be delivered.* I'm certainly not going to ask them to go back to those days, and I don't really believe that anyone here does either.
Frankly, this is one of those cases where the Shanghai studio is maturing in the way they handle discussion of future work, and it should be commended, not condemned.
|
Reign Omega
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
118
|
Posted - 2014.01.30 00:59:00 -
[346] - Quote
Heinrich Jagerblitzen wrote:Reign Omega wrote:In closing, all we are really looking for is at least acknowledgement that this is possible, as it is obviously something wanted. Ccp comments on the most mundane hocus pocus but can't shoot a nod in for this? It's possible, It's wanted, and it's something the CPM will continue to encourage CCP to consider when examining Dust 514's content lineup. The reason you're not going to hear much from CCP right now is that they are the middle of a very high-level, long-term planning process, and its clear to me that new EP recognizes that in the past promises have been made and features discussed that were never delivered up (or took ages to deliver). This only results in more player rage, and so its absolutely crucial that long-term goals and major feature overhauls are planned out and discussed with the community only after a sober vetting process that prevents the mistakes of the past (overpromise, underdeliver) from happening all over again under the new boss. What the majority of petitioners want in this thread right now is for CCP to come out and say "this is great, we'll do this next".....which would be about as irresponsible as getting on stage at FanFest and making a bunch of claims about what was coming in the year that was in no way realistic or deliverable based on the rate the studio was able to churn out content. I think its completely healthy for CCP to reserve comment on a feature or its future until they've discussed it internally, assessed what it would take to implement, and had a realistic idea of if/when it could be delivered.* I'm certainly not going to ask them to go back to those days, and I don't really believe that anyone here does either. Frankly, this is one of those cases where the Shanghai studio is maturing in the way they handle discussion of future work, and it should be commended, not condemned.
Thank you for the timely informative level headed post. I will now put my torch back in its holder and my pitchfork in its bale of hay.
|
Heinrich Jagerblitzen
D3LTA FORC3
1496
|
Posted - 2014.01.30 01:03:00 -
[347] - Quote
Reign Omega wrote: Thank you for the timely informative level headed post. I will now put my torch back in its holder and my pitchfork in its bale of hay.
You're very welcome. Glad I could be of some help.
o7
|
Ghost Kaisar
Titans of Phoenix Legacy Rising
2451
|
Posted - 2014.01.30 01:29:00 -
[348] - Quote
Heinrich Jagerblitzen wrote:
....and THAN you can go grab your pitchforks again if don't hear what you're looking for. Fair enough?
That was a really great post. +1
But you still need to fix something in that second to last sentence.....
Nothing says "F**K YOU!" like a direct Flaylock to the face.
Minmatar. In Rust we trust.
|
Heinrich Jagerblitzen
D3LTA FORC3
1501
|
Posted - 2014.01.30 01:52:00 -
[349] - Quote
Ghost Kaisar wrote:
That was a really great post. +1
But you still need to fix something in that second to last sentence.....
Heinrich Jagerblitzen wrote:
....and THAN you can go grab your pitchforks again if you don't hear what you're looking for. Fair enough?
I was missing the bolded word. Apologies for the grammar mistake. |
Draco Cerberus
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
734
|
Posted - 2014.01.30 04:53:00 -
[350] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote: Learn to read.
Have you ever in your life considered that an illiterate lunatic most likely has made more sense in this thread that your ridiculous posts thus far IWS, if you were a goon you would give them a bad name.
LogiGod earns his pips
|
|
Draco Cerberus
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
735
|
Posted - 2014.01.30 05:11:00 -
[351] - Quote
Heinrich Jagerblitzen wrote:843-BANE wrote:Oh and well done, trying to make it look like I'M the reason we won't get corporation battles now, what are you? 7 years old? Jesus H Christ can we get a real CPM to comment please? First off, IWS is absolutely a "real CPM" and one of our workhorses on the team, disrespecting him isn't going to impress me, or CCP, or anyone else for that matter. If you're going to lecture about maturity, make sure you're exuding it yourself. Also - I'm not sure how long you've been around these forums, but while IWS has been blessed with the urge to post prolifically, eloquence has never been his strong suit. This is a classic case of players having an absolute meltdown over a series of extremely rational (and truthful) comments about the issue. Look, it may seem like people don't respect IWS because he has given us no reason to return the respect. Respect is earned, not something handed out like candy at Halloween. With the bad attitude towards CPM constituents there is a good reason for a lack of respect towards Iron Wolf Sabre. Something my mother told me one time was Mother wrote:If you can't say anything nice, don't say anything at all.
I think in this case it applies. Iron Wolf should grow up.
LogiGod earns his pips
|
843 nerfnut96
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
205
|
Posted - 2014.01.30 06:39:00 -
[352] - Quote
BURGEZZ LISTEN UP!
I don't want any more hostility here. We can discus our views and opinions about what went on here on our own site. You may by all means continue to support and reply to this thread but do not continue this argument, arguing with the devs won't change anything for the better.
The next member of burgezz to attack or disrespect the CPM or CCP on this thread or any other will be disciplined.
Capt. Nerfnut96 // Ranking Officer // War Director // Burgezz ETF
|
Iron Wolf Saber
Den of Swords
12778
|
Posted - 2014.01.30 07:03:00 -
[353] - Quote
843 nerfnut96 wrote:BURGEZZ LISTEN UP!I don't want any more hostility here. We can discus our views and opinions about what went on here on our own site. You may by all means continue to support and reply to this thread but do not continue this argument, arguing with the devs won't change anything for the better. The next member of burgezz to attack or disrespect the CPM or CCP on this thread or any other will be disciplined.
Thank you,
Moving forward we have to recognize that this will be calling for a new feature not an old one.
So taking that opportunity to start "with a clean slate" on how to make this feature fun how would you go about it?
The 'if you could design it' sort of thinking here and we'll try to work out issues as we imagine them.
CPM 0 Secretary
Omni-Soldier, Forum Warrior, Annoying Artist
\\= Advanced Caldari Assault // Unlocked
|
843-BANE
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
678
|
Posted - 2014.01.30 07:42:00 -
[354] - Quote
Heinrich Jagerblitzen wrote:843-BANE wrote:Oh and well done, trying to make it look like I'M the reason we won't get corporation battles now, what are you? 7 years old? Jesus H Christ can we get a real CPM to comment please? First off, IWS is absolutely a "real CPM" and one of our workhorses on the team, disrespecting him isn't going to impress me, or CCP, or anyone else for that matter. If you're going to lecture about maturity, make sure you're exuding it yourself. Also - I'm not sure how long you've been around these forums, but while IWS has been blessed with the urge to post prolifically, eloquence has never been his strong suit. This is a classic case of players having an absolute meltdown over a series of extremely rational (and truthful) comments about the issue. The bottom line is this, no one (not the CPM, not CCP) is putting some foot down and refusing to deliver Corp Battles. This whole approachj of "GRAB THE TORCHES, FIRE UP THE PETITION, LETS HAVE A REVOLUTION" is a huge mistaken waste of effort, just as IWS previously said. Here are the unadulterated facts, scrubbed of hyperbole and emotion: 1.) CCP does not respond to petitions. They have never been a recognized form of getting a feature or change pushed, They're not about to be, and signing and spamming one carries zero weight in terms of actually accomplishing what you want to accomplish. 2.) There is no need to convince either the CPM or CCP that there is plenty broken with PC, and plenty of merit in having pitched battles between corporation. I've personally brainstormed ideas with devs directly and seen interest in offering this type of gameplay in the future, the lack of them coming out and promising to work on this feature tomorrow does not mean that anyone's saying "corp battles will never happen in the future". 3.) CCP is undergoing some heavy internal examination under the leadership of the new EP, they're not ready to discuss the future of Dust at this time, but they will in the not-too-distant future. No, we cannot give you an ETA. 4.) The long-term planning taking place under the new EP will have a lot to do with what major features like this get worked on and in what order. 5.) CCP is working on dropsuits and weapons and balancing in the meantime, because work must continue, and this is low-hanging fruit they can manage without needing the long-term plans finalized yet. Work on dropsuits and balances does NOT indicate that this is the most important aspect of the game, only one that is manageable independent of the larger picture, which is still being painted. 6.) Pretending that there's some battle here between the will of the players and the will of CCP or the CPM is pointless and harmful, it wastes other community member's energy by leading them into a confrontation that is both unnecessary and only going to lessen your credibility as someone trying to make positive change. So by all means, continue to berate IWS for sharing the truth, which is that Corp Contracts are not going to magically appear in 1.8 because you made a petition and got a bunch of people angry at a perceived slight. Corp contracts will also not return in their previous form, certainly not tied to Faction Warfare and certainly not without some of the design issues addressed in the process. Will they return in some form, some day? I certainly hope so, as do all of the rest of the CPM. No one's fighting the -idea- of corp contracts, all IWS is trying to explain is that stamping our feet and bumping threads is not going to be the way this gets implemented. If any of MY statement above is factually untrue (such as devs EXPLICITLY declaring they will not be re-implementing a corp contract system or providing corps freedom to create their own content at districts) , feel free to correct me here. Otherwise, I'm more than happy to dowse the torches and send everyone home from the riot party with the comfortable knowledge that there's no need to obnoxiously bump threads and lead a faux revolution just to "be heard". You've been heard by the CPM, you've been heard by CCP, everyone knows PC is broke and corp contracts were more fun, and all there is left to do is to chill for a bit until the new EP can share with you his plan for the future. ....and THAN you can go grab your pitchforks again if don't hear what you're looking for. Fair enough?
Thank you Hans, that is an awesome answer and exactly what I believe everyone here has been looking for. I never wanted anything more or less than that, I believe that answer for now will suffice what I have been looking for. I know nothing of the mechanics, why the two systems can't interact or why any of this couldn't happen anyway. You've explained that to me, and I thank you for it.
I apoligise for hostility towards you IWS, but perhaps you owe me a similar apology.
Much appreciated Hans. This is all we were asking for.
BRING BACK CORP BATTLES
SIGN THE PEITION HERE
|
Marad''er
Ancient Exiles. Renegade Alliance
755
|
Posted - 2014.01.30 08:00:00 -
[355] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:843 nerfnut96 wrote:BURGEZZ LISTEN UP!I don't want any more hostility here. We can discus our views and opinions about what went on here on our own site. You may by all means continue to support and reply to this thread but do not continue this argument, arguing with the devs won't change anything for the better. The next member of burgezz to attack or disrespect the CPM or CCP on this thread or any other will be disciplined. Thank you, Moving forward we have to recognize that this will be calling for a new feature not an old one. So taking that opportunity to start "with a clean slate" on how to make this feature fun how would you go about it? The 'if you could design it' sort of thinking here and we'll try to work out issues as we imagine them. Tbh, I don't think there was anything bad with the "old feature"
There was no "no showing" as it would be pointless to accept the contract if you were going to no show. Both sides made a bet. Winner took the pot. It was pretty good.
Only problem now looking back at it, I don't think their should be eve support. As eve support should be for PC. I also think there should be a hard cap of how much isk can be bet. Also, I think you should be able to choose how many players can be in the battle. A sort of slider maybe?
I also believe that no isk should be made to individuals in the battle. Only the corp should receive the isk amount that both sides put in first.
GôÉGô¥GôÿGô£Gôö > GôÉGô¢Gô¢
Gÿà¿When will dust get better?Gÿà
Forum Warrior LV. 4 | pâÅpéñpâápü»tºüpü«µëôµÆâpéÆF¦ápüúpüªpüäpéï | PSN: I-NINJA-ALL-DAY
|
Iron Wolf Saber
Den of Swords
12779
|
Posted - 2014.01.30 09:12:00 -
[356] - Quote
843-BANE wrote:Heinrich Jagerblitzen wrote:843-BANE wrote:Oh and well done, trying to make it look like I'M the reason we won't get corporation battles now, what are you? 7 years old? Jesus H Christ can we get a real CPM to comment please? First off, IWS is absolutely a "real CPM" and one of our workhorses on the team, disrespecting him isn't going to impress me, or CCP, or anyone else for that matter. If you're going to lecture about maturity, make sure you're exuding it yourself. Also - I'm not sure how long you've been around these forums, but while IWS has been blessed with the urge to post prolifically, eloquence has never been his strong suit. This is a classic case of players having an absolute meltdown over a series of extremely rational (and truthful) comments about the issue. The bottom line is this, no one (not the CPM, not CCP) is putting some foot down and refusing to deliver Corp Battles. This whole approachj of "GRAB THE TORCHES, FIRE UP THE PETITION, LETS HAVE A REVOLUTION" is a huge mistaken waste of effort, just as IWS previously said. Here are the unadulterated facts, scrubbed of hyperbole and emotion: 1.) CCP does not respond to petitions. They have never been a recognized form of getting a feature or change pushed, They're not about to be, and signing and spamming one carries zero weight in terms of actually accomplishing what you want to accomplish. 2.) There is no need to convince either the CPM or CCP that there is plenty broken with PC, and plenty of merit in having pitched battles between corporation. I've personally brainstormed ideas with devs directly and seen interest in offering this type of gameplay in the future, the lack of them coming out and promising to work on this feature tomorrow does not mean that anyone's saying "corp battles will never happen in the future". 3.) CCP is undergoing some heavy internal examination under the leadership of the new EP, they're not ready to discuss the future of Dust at this time, but they will in the not-too-distant future. No, we cannot give you an ETA. 4.) The long-term planning taking place under the new EP will have a lot to do with what major features like this get worked on and in what order. 5.) CCP is working on dropsuits and weapons and balancing in the meantime, because work must continue, and this is low-hanging fruit they can manage without needing the long-term plans finalized yet. Work on dropsuits and balances does NOT indicate that this is the most important aspect of the game, only one that is manageable independent of the larger picture, which is still being painted. 6.) Pretending that there's some battle here between the will of the players and the will of CCP or the CPM is pointless and harmful, it wastes other community member's energy by leading them into a confrontation that is both unnecessary and only going to lessen your credibility as someone trying to make positive change. So by all means, continue to berate IWS for sharing the truth, which is that Corp Contracts are not going to magically appear in 1.8 because you made a petition and got a bunch of people angry at a perceived slight. Corp contracts will also not return in their previous form, certainly not tied to Faction Warfare and certainly not without some of the design issues addressed in the process. Will they return in some form, some day? I certainly hope so, as do all of the rest of the CPM. No one's fighting the -idea- of corp contracts, all IWS is trying to explain is that stamping our feet and bumping threads is not going to be the way this gets implemented. If any of MY statement above is factually untrue (such as devs EXPLICITLY declaring they will not be re-implementing a corp contract system or providing corps freedom to create their own content at districts) , feel free to correct me here. Otherwise, I'm more than happy to dowse the torches and send everyone home from the riot party with the comfortable knowledge that there's no need to obnoxiously bump threads and lead a faux revolution just to "be heard". You've been heard by the CPM, you've been heard by CCP, everyone knows PC is broke and corp contracts were more fun, and all there is left to do is to chill for a bit until the new EP can share with you his plan for the future. ....and THAN you can go grab your pitchforks again if don't hear what you're looking for. Fair enough? Thank you Hans, that is an awesome answer and exactly what I believe everyone here has been looking for. I never wanted anything more or less than that, I believe that answer for now will suffice what I have been looking for. I know nothing of the mechanics, why the two systems can't interact or why any of this couldn't happen anyway. You've explained that to me, and I thank you for it. I apoligise for hostility towards you IWS, but perhaps you owe me a similar apology. Much appreciated Hans. This is all we were asking for.
Sorry for being a military hard ass, sometimes notion of boot ramming up someone's posterior to the point they're tasting leather gets the better of me at times.
CPM 0 Secretary
Omni-Soldier, Forum Warrior, Annoying Artist
\\= Advanced Caldari Assault // Unlocked
|
Draco Cerberus
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
735
|
Posted - 2014.01.30 09:31:00 -
[357] - Quote
I agree that there should be some form of choice to battle size as well Marauder. I also think that there should be an option to join theses battles and set them as a squad or corp, make them publicly available to whomever want to accept them, with the option to also set them with a certain person or squad. Squad bets X isk, squad splits with winnings. The bet coming equally out of each member's wallets divided by the number of players in each team.
LogiGod earns his pips
|
Sole Fenychs
Sinq Laison Gendarmes Gallente Federation
132
|
Posted - 2014.01.30 09:50:00 -
[358] - Quote
Heinrich Jagerblitzen wrote:So by all means, continue to berate IWS for sharing the truth, which is that Corp Contracts are not going to magically appear in 1.8 because you made a petition and got a bunch of people angry at a perceived slight. Corp contracts will also not return in their previous form, certainly not tied to Faction Warfare and certainly not without some of the design issues addressed in the process. Will they return in some form, some day? I certainly hope so, as do all of the rest of the CPM. No one's fighting the -idea- of corp contracts, all IWS is trying to explain is that stamping our feet and bumping threads is not going to be the way this gets implemented.
If any of MY statement above is factually untrue (such as devs EXPLICITLY declaring they will not be re-implementing a corp contract system or providing corps freedom to create their own content at districts) , feel free to correct me here. Otherwise, I'm more than happy to dowse the torches and send everyone home from the riot party with the comfortable knowledge that there's no need to obnoxiously bump threads and lead a faux revolution just to "be heard". You've been heard by the CPM, you've been heard by CCP, everyone knows PC is broke and corp contracts were more fun, and all there is left to do is to chill for a bit until the new EP can share with you his plan for the future.
....and THAN you can go grab your pitchforks again if don't hear what you're looking for. Fair enough? Why not like this right from the beginning?
Your post is wonderfully informative, in contrast to the very... political way that IWS tends to express himself with. Reminds me of that thread about pre-nerfing cloaks that he masked by claiming that he is eager to see cloaks.
This kind of answer is exactly what I'm browsing the forum for. |
843-BANE
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
684
|
Posted - 2014.01.30 09:52:00 -
[359] - Quote
Quote:
Sorry for being a military hard ass, sometimes notion of boot ramming up someone's posterior to the point they're tasting leather gets the better of me at times.
No worries, we all get a big hot-headed in the heat of something, especially when there's someone like me stirring **** up. But you know, as stated I think now we've all got each-other's attention perhaps this is a time to discuss ways of implementation.
As we can see from the PC protest people are demanding a hot-fix, I don't think that is likely possible as I think it would have been done if possible. PC repair will likely take some time, and I'm sure step by step that will be completed.
Arena battles are something that has been mentioned by others here and by CCP, is there any more information on what to expect from such a mode? The main thing I would like to achieve is that idea of an 'alternative' for those who can't afford (monetarily and literally) Planetary conquest, as I believe rightly so that pond is reserved for the big fish. Perhaps (as also mentioned by CCP) something similar to what MAG accomplished in the sense of 'Team Deploy' or 'Corp Deploy'. This would however present the potential problem of stomping to a new level, especially if introduced in FW.
A seperate mode seems to make sense. If it somehow would tie in with PC, but maybe not be directly linked or as costly? That would be awesome. Maybe have no land aquisition involved, but make the fights still as impactful. Someone else here wrote about an idea where (in lore) a rich space-entrepreneur purchases a planet/system, and we could have an official fight club, that would be awesome.
BRING BACK CORP BATTLES
SIGN THE PEITION HERE
|
Marad''er
Ancient Exiles. Renegade Alliance
758
|
Posted - 2014.01.30 17:08:00 -
[360] - Quote
Marad''er wrote:Iron Wolf Saber wrote:843 nerfnut96 wrote:BURGEZZ LISTEN UP!I don't want any more hostility here. We can discus our views and opinions about what went on here on our own site. You may by all means continue to support and reply to this thread but do not continue this argument, arguing with the devs won't change anything for the better. The next member of burgezz to attack or disrespect the CPM or CCP on this thread or any other will be disciplined. Thank you, Moving forward we have to recognize that this will be calling for a new feature not an old one. So taking that opportunity to start "with a clean slate" on how to make this feature fun how would you go about it? The 'if you could design it' sort of thinking here and we'll try to work out issues as we imagine them. Tbh, I don't think there was anything bad with the "old feature" There was no "no showing" as it would be pointless to accept the contract if you were going to no show. Both sides made a bet. Winner took the pot. It was pretty good. Only problem now looking back at it, I don't think their should be eve support. As eve support should be for PC. I also think there should be a hard cap of how much isk can be bet. Also, I think you should be able to choose how many players can be in the battle. A sort of slider maybe? I also believe that no isk should be made to individuals in the battle. Only the corp should receive the isk amount that both sides put in first.
GôÉGô¥GôÿGô£Gôö > GôÉGô¢Gô¢
Gÿà¿When will dust get better?Gÿà
Forum Warrior LV. 4 | pâÅpéñpâápü»tºüpü«µëôµÆâpéÆF¦ápüúpüªpüäpéï | PSN: I-NINJA-ALL-DAY
|
|
noob cavman
Tickle My Null-Sac
503
|
Posted - 2014.01.30 17:21:00 -
[361] - Quote
Also corp battles would be amzing to fight your own corp again. Some of my fondest memories of chrome were training battles were we would only fight for one point. 1 hour mass murder brawls
I want to be a caveman!
Ccp: DENIED YOU DRUNK
British ninja cowboy
scout, logi, heavy
|
elric the enchanter
xCosmic Voidx Partners of Industrial Service and Salvage
326
|
Posted - 2014.01.30 20:18:00 -
[362] - Quote
From the perspective of a medium sized corp formed near the beginning of open beta, we would love to see the return of corp battles in some shape or form - primarily to prevent boredom and burnout.
We have dabbled in PC (districts and alliance ringing) but the time pressures put a large number of us off very quickly. We are a casual corp, who really enjoy the game, and want to have fun when real life permits - not be dictated to by the game.
To prevent the grind to cap becoming too tedious we have begun such events as our own 'heavy nova knifing' matches for laughs, but it's rather tricky when it's a pub match and the opposing team are all sporting kalakiota rail rifles!!! The return of a match-type where we could pre-agree the rules/weapons/vehicles etc against corps we knew wanted similar fun would be awesome.
Wouldn't mind mind if there was no payout (the old contract system worked well), although salvage would be a nice touch.
Tried being CEO of Cosmic Void once...
...but it's in safe hands now!
|
Killar-12
The Corporate Raiders Top Men.
2125
|
Posted - 2014.01.30 21:18:00 -
[363] - Quote
Marad''er wrote:Iron Wolf Saber wrote:843 nerfnut96 wrote:BURGEZZ LISTEN UP!I don't want any more hostility here. We can discus our views and opinions about what went on here on our own site. You may by all means continue to support and reply to this thread but do not continue this argument, arguing with the devs won't change anything for the better. The next member of burgezz to attack or disrespect the CPM or CCP on this thread or any other will be disciplined. Thank you, Moving forward we have to recognize that this will be calling for a new feature not an old one. So taking that opportunity to start "with a clean slate" on how to make this feature fun how would you go about it? The 'if you could design it' sort of thinking here and we'll try to work out issues as we imagine them. Tbh, I don't think there was anything bad with the "old feature" There was no "no showing" as it would be pointless to accept the contract if you were going to no show. Both sides made a bet. Winner took the pot. It was pretty good. Only problem now looking back at it, I don't think their should be eve support. As eve support should be for PC. I also think there should be a hard cap of how much isk can be bet. Also, I think you should be able to choose how many players can be in the battle. A sort of slider maybe? I also believe that no isk should be made to individuals in the battle. Only the corp should receive the isk amount that both sides put in first. tbqh I remeber fondly PRO vs PFBHz and if FWA vs whomever happens I'll be happy. seriously say if Kujo fucks up and AE's corp wallet's on the line I'll hire N-F to get that ISK into the TCR pot and a decent chunk to find it's way back to N-F
A-Teams win Battles B-Teams win Campaigns C-Teams win Wars
|
October SnowFox
Vacuum Cleaner. LLC
183
|
Posted - 2014.01.30 21:34:00 -
[364] - Quote
+ 1 from Russians also share this info with my friends
-ö-¦-é-ü-¦-+-¦ -+-¦-ç-é-+-¦ -Ç-¦-+-î-ê-¦ -¦-ï-+ - -¦-+-ü-+-+-+-¦-¦-é.
-ó-¦-+-¦-Ç-î -+-¦ -¦-+-+-¦-+-ï-à -+-+-+-¦-¦-à - Doom -+ Warcraft...
|
Aellir Dae
LUX AETERNA DIS
8
|
Posted - 2014.01.30 21:43:00 -
[365] - Quote
I support Topic Starter as a head of largest russian-based DUST514 community. We need this feature back. Remastered and refitted with new functions.
PC is broken. Everyone knows it. |
ANON Cerberus
Tiny Toons
231
|
Posted - 2014.01.30 21:50:00 -
[366] - Quote
Why they ever removed this feature is beyond me. +1.
All I can think is that CCP really dont have a solid plan for this game and just make things up as they go. |
Marad''er
Ancient Exiles. Renegade Alliance
766
|
Posted - 2014.01.31 04:52:00 -
[367] - Quote
Killar-12 wrote:Marad''er wrote:Iron Wolf Saber wrote:843 nerfnut96 wrote:BURGEZZ LISTEN UP!I don't want any more hostility here. We can discus our views and opinions about what went on here on our own site. You may by all means continue to support and reply to this thread but do not continue this argument, arguing with the devs won't change anything for the better. The next member of burgezz to attack or disrespect the CPM or CCP on this thread or any other will be disciplined. Thank you, Moving forward we have to recognize that this will be calling for a new feature not an old one. So taking that opportunity to start "with a clean slate" on how to make this feature fun how would you go about it? The 'if you could design it' sort of thinking here and we'll try to work out issues as we imagine them. Tbh, I don't think there was anything bad with the "old feature" There was no "no showing" as it would be pointless to accept the contract if you were going to no show. Both sides made a bet. Winner took the pot. It was pretty good. Only problem now looking back at it, I don't think their should be eve support. As eve support should be for PC. I also think there should be a hard cap of how much isk can be bet. Also, I think you should be able to choose how many players can be in the battle. A sort of slider maybe? I also believe that no isk should be made to individuals in the battle. Only the corp should receive the isk amount that both sides put in first. tbqh I remeber fondly PRO vs PFBHz and if FWA vs whomever happens I'll be happy. seriously say if Kujo fucks up and AE's corp wallet's on the line I'll hire N-F to get that ISK into the TCR pot and a decent chunk to find it's way back to N-F Our corp wallets empty... Kujo steals most of it every week after pay checks :P
(Bump)
GôÉGô¥GôÿGô£Gôö > GôÉGô¢Gô¢
Gÿà¿When will dust get better?Gÿà
Forum Warrior LV. 4 | Banishment this World! | PSN: I-NINJA-ALL-DAY
|
Night 5talker 514
Freek Coalition Freek Alliance
155
|
Posted - 2014.01.31 11:48:00 -
[368] - Quote
As a smaller growing corp we would really like to have corp battles back as they used to be! |
Repe Susi
Rautaleijona Top Men.
989
|
Posted - 2014.01.31 11:52:00 -
[369] - Quote
Night 5talker 514 wrote:As a smaller growing corp we would really like to have corp battles back as they used to be!
Saame here!
Bring back the Corporation Battles!
Life is pleasant. Death is peaceful. It's the transition that's troublesome. ~ Isaac Asimov
|
Squagga
The State Protectorate
102
|
Posted - 2014.01.31 14:17:00 -
[370] - Quote
I'm glad this is one it's 19th page! Hopefully CCP will listen
Reloading, the silent killer.
|
|
Dagon Greyjoy
GRIM MARCH D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E
0
|
Posted - 2014.01.31 14:39:00 -
[371] - Quote
I'd love to see this too, but I'll tell you right now that CCP won't like it, and if they do there'll be a ****-ton of restrictions. The issue is that there's a low player count as it is. If people start spending a lot of time off the existing matches because they'd rather play with friends, it's going to make the already-obnoxious wait times for stuff like FW even longer. And when they finally make Scotty stop failing at life and do actual match-making, the same issue will pop up for pub matches as well.
If it comes to pass, expect there to be a sizable entrance fee as a straight isk-sink to dis-incentivize over use, as well as a timer or quota system so people don't spend more than a few matches a week on this.
Honestly until they figure out a way to get the player numbers back up, I doubt you'll even get that much. They need to really work on making the game easier for the average gamer to pick up and actually WANT to keep playing, revamping battle academy, offing some kind of interactive training sessions or simulators/target ranges, SOMETHING to get people to stay long enough to get commited.
All the same, I wish you luck with this petition. Getting corps more ways to learn how to work as a unit, and giving people more chances to innovate strategies, these are noble goals. |
Al the destroyer
NECROM0NGERS The CORVOS
52
|
Posted - 2014.01.31 15:21:00 -
[372] - Quote
+1 love the idea |
Soldier Sorajord
Subsonic Synthesis RISE of LEGION
40
|
Posted - 2014.01.31 16:14:00 -
[373] - Quote
843-BANE wrote:CCP. Don't just breeze through this. You need to hear the players. LISTEN TO US. WE ARE YOUR CUSTOMERS. Anyway, Corp battles. Would it be so hard to bring them back, seriously? I'm talking old school contract battles. Why bring them back? - Two teams who CHOOSE to fight eachother - Two teams that can fight WHEN they want to fight - Two teams that can specify rules and ISK loss/gain - No political/meta stigma - A chance for newer corps to integrate In the current climate, CCP, how can you possibly expect younger corporations or specialised corporations to compete on their own terms? Not only will it cost them 36 million ISK to start a weak attack (Chump change for you and me, riches for some) but they have so many factors that limit their targets such as the forced time frames, people locking districts, and skill level itself. With PC there is ONE way for newer corporations to gain competitive experience, and that is through Planet Fight Club. Don't get me wrong, PFC is fantastic however there are only so many districts, only so many corporations that can participate and it just isn't fair on many players. PC just isn't an option for so many corporations out there, and I feel awful for them. Corp battles allow teams (both new and old) to organise battles of whatever magnitude they may like on their own terms. I would suggest some limitations be put in place however to prevent forms of boosting or cheating: - No affect on statistics such as K/D. W/L or any leaderboard stats - No ISK gain OTHER than the contract issued. - No SP gain (perhaps 1000 SP Max if it seems unfair, as if they had capped) I honestly cannot fathom why this cannot be implemented. It is not new tech, it is not untested, we USED to have this and it was fantastic. It meant corporations could say this:"Hey, you guys want to have a fight? Maybe get some new strategies down?" "Yeah sounds great" "Awesome, be ready in 5 mins" At the moment corps have to do this:"Hey, you guys want to have a fight? Maybe get some new strategies down?" "Yeah sounds great" "Ok, in 1 day and 14 hours when you may or may not be available, we will be attacking this corporation. However it's costing us 36 million so you damn well better be there". So please, CCP. Reply to this. Give the corporations out there not ready for PC some sort of hope. Hell, it'd be good for EVERY corporation anyway! Fights as and when you want, friendlies, fun matches, etc. Imagine how much easier thunderdome would be! You know that thing you made a Dev post about? Imagine how much easier it would be for Judge Radamanthus to test out Dropships and teach the community! Imagine how much easier it would be to have xXGhazbaranXx show us some awesome trick shots. Opening corp battles opens up a huge potential for change and progression in Dust, and I think we need to address this NOW. None of this 'Road map' stuff, I believe I'm not the only one who'll want an answer. In addition, I've started a Petition to make the numbers of signers a little more evident. https://www.change.org/petitions/ccp-add-corp-battles-back-to-dustI don't know how useful or easy it is to sign with that site, I'm hoping it will be a visual representation to CCP of how crucial this is. Thank you. I expect the usual trolling/QQ/Whatever but I will continue to bump this until I receive a productive response from CCP. PLEASE SIGN THE PETITION TO HELP THE CAUSE, THANK YOUhttps://www.change.org/petitions/ccp-add-corp-battles-back-to-dust i'd actually like the ability to fight another corporation without the need of DISTRICTS. it'd be fun to have friendly matches of only two corporations fighting each other and not have it be over something that makes us greedy like DISTRICTS. Like cmon. Corporational Ambushes? That'd be awesome!
Sora's the name. Gallente is my game.
Yup! Gallente Specialist Here :)
Subsonic.
|
Draco Cerberus
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
740
|
Posted - 2014.01.31 19:18:00 -
[374] - Quote
Marad''er wrote: Our corp wallets empty... Kujo steals most of it every week after pay checks :P
Wow...still?
LogiGod earns his pips
|
Draco Cerberus
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
740
|
Posted - 2014.01.31 19:23:00 -
[375] - Quote
Dagon Greyjoy wrote:I'd love to see this too, but I'll tell you right now that CCP won't like it, and if they do there'll be a ****-ton of restrictions. The issue is that there's a low player count as it is. If people start spending a lot of time off the existing matches because they'd rather play with friends, it's going to make the already-obnoxious wait times for stuff like FW even longer. And when they finally make Scotty stop failing at life and do actual match-making, the same issue will pop up for pub matches as well.
Maybe an Open World solution would benefit us at this point, with an introduction of PVE to add to the already diminished PVP content we may be able to see some of our old friends and competition return to the field. This addition of an arena would certainly help train troops, I love the fact that it doesn't require a district.
LogiGod earns his pips
|
Killar-12
The Corporate Raiders Top Men.
2133
|
Posted - 2014.01.31 20:16:00 -
[376] - Quote
Marad''er wrote:Killar-12 wrote:Marad''er wrote:Iron Wolf Saber wrote:843 nerfnut96 wrote:BURGEZZ LISTEN UP!I don't want any more hostility here. We can discus our views and opinions about what went on here on our own site. You may by all means continue to support and reply to this thread but do not continue this argument, arguing with the devs won't change anything for the better. The next member of burgezz to attack or disrespect the CPM or CCP on this thread or any other will be disciplined. Thank you, Moving forward we have to recognize that this will be calling for a new feature not an old one. So taking that opportunity to start "with a clean slate" on how to make this feature fun how would you go about it? The 'if you could design it' sort of thinking here and we'll try to work out issues as we imagine them. Tbh, I don't think there was anything bad with the "old feature" There was no "no showing" as it would be pointless to accept the contract if you were going to no show. Both sides made a bet. Winner took the pot. It was pretty good. Only problem now looking back at it, I don't think their should be eve support. As eve support should be for PC. I also think there should be a hard cap of how much isk can be bet. Also, I think you should be able to choose how many players can be in the battle. A sort of slider maybe? I also believe that no isk should be made to individuals in the battle. Only the corp should receive the isk amount that both sides put in first. tbqh I remeber fondly PRO vs PFBHz and if FWA vs whomever happens I'll be happy. seriously say if Kujo fucks up and AE's corp wallet's on the line I'll hire N-F to get that ISK into the TCR pot and a decent chunk to find it's way back to N-F Our corp wallets empty... Kujo steals most of it every week after pay checks :P (Bump) looks at Nyain well that's always 2 in the morning...
A-Teams win Battles B-Teams win Campaigns C-Teams win Wars
|
Squagga
The State Protectorate
111
|
Posted - 2014.01.31 20:29:00 -
[377] - Quote
Customers is a loose term
Reloading, the silent killer.
|
Sole Fenychs
Sinq Laison Gendarmes Gallente Federation
144
|
Posted - 2014.01.31 20:38:00 -
[378] - Quote
Squagga wrote:Customers is a loose term Reminds me of a phrase: "The person not paying is what's on sale" |
843-BANE
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
719
|
Posted - 2014.02.01 10:57:00 -
[379] - Quote
Squagga wrote:Customers is a loose term
Indeed!
Director // Major // BurgezzE.T.F
Challenge me to Thunderdome.
|
Draco Cerberus
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
744
|
Posted - 2014.02.01 16:08:00 -
[380] - Quote
Well, although Dust 514 is a Free-to-play game, anyone who uses it is still a potential if not already existing customer. While I agree that it is questionable at this point in time if anyone feels paying for items or aurum is worthwhile, I would still like to point out that I myself have been a customer of CCP's for quite some time, going back to before the time Dust existed. I know I am not the only one.
LogiGod earns his pips
|
|
Sole Fenychs
Sinq Laison Gendarmes Gallente Federation
158
|
Posted - 2014.02.01 16:14:00 -
[381] - Quote
Draco Cerberus wrote:Well, although Dust 514 is a Free-to-play game, anyone who uses it is still a potential if not already existing customer. While I agree that it is questionable at this point in time if anyone feels paying for items or aurum is worthwhile, I would still like to point out that I myself have been a customer of CCP's for quite some time, going back to before the time Dust existed. I know I am not the only one. You are the product as long as you don't pay. You are intended to give the customers reason to play the game and invest even more money. You become a customer once you invest money.
Basically, non-paying players are very smart and emotional bots. |
Kilo Shells
G.L.O.R.Y
30
|
Posted - 2014.02.02 18:11:00 -
[382] - Quote
+1
Caldari Assault
|
Turtle Hermit Roshi
D.A.R.K L.E.G.I.O.N D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E
70
|
Posted - 2014.02.02 20:17:00 -
[383] - Quote
Turrtle Hermit Roshi -signed
yes i scream KA-ME-HA-MEHAAAAAA when i forge muthafuckas
the Turtle Hermit: Professional Heavy
|
xXCleopatra FlippantXx
Red Star. EoN.
35
|
Posted - 2014.02.02 20:32:00 -
[384] - Quote
sign it sign it sign it buggerballs, just sigh it plox. This would be very good for corps indeed |
Vinny Gar
H.A.R.V.E.S.T. Legacy Rising
1
|
Posted - 2014.02.02 23:18:00 -
[385] - Quote
+1 |
John Mocahn
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
356
|
Posted - 2014.02.04 23:52:00 -
[386] - Quote
bump
843 Dust Commander
Proto Heavy // Prof.5 HMG // Prof. 4 Forge
BurgezzE.T.F
|
Joel II X
Dah Gods O Bacon
824
|
Posted - 2014.02.05 00:46:00 -
[387] - Quote
Would be cool. |
Killar-12
The Corporate Raiders Top Men.
2210
|
Posted - 2014.02.05 02:19:00 -
[388] - Quote
Bumpski
Listen
I'll change the song every week
|
Sum1ne Else
WASTELAND JUNK REMOVAL Top Men.
874
|
Posted - 2014.02.05 16:11:00 -
[389] - Quote
"Nothing is impossible, the word itself says 'I'm possible'!" Audrey Hepburn
Public Relations WJR
Its a leopleuradon Charlie a magical leoplueradon, its gunna guide our way to candy mountain!
|
itsmebj turtle
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
3
|
Posted - 2014.02.08 17:29:00 -
[390] - Quote
as a new player this would allow my corp to set up a training time to help me improve my game. right now there is no where to learn. this is my 1st fps lost a lot of clones to just learning to shoot. corp battle would give an opportunity to learn without a lot of loss. |
|
TechMechMeds
Swamp Tempo Canis Eliminatus Operatives
2609
|
Posted - 2014.02.08 18:48:00 -
[391] - Quote
Random noises.corp battles please, etc.
Level 2 forum warrior.
Swamp iz on dat welevant flex fam
I sold my family to the Amarr for isk, its a valid tactic
|
Ku Shala
Onuoto Uakan Huogaatsu
836
|
Posted - 2014.02.08 18:58:00 -
[392] - Quote
CCP I think the people have spoken!
For what is right. For what is ours, Onuoto Uakan Huogaatsu Join us today!
The States Necromancer
For The State!
|
Levithunder
Butt Hurt Try Hards Primus Federation
160
|
Posted - 2014.02.08 20:53:00 -
[393] - Quote
20 pages and still no blue tag reply? Really sad ccp.
(-í° -£-û -í°) against my adversaries.
|
I-Shayz-I
I-----I
2220
|
Posted - 2014.02.08 23:53:00 -
[394] - Quote
bumping this.
Links:
List of Most Important Threads
I make logistics videos!
|
safura trotsky
Kill Mode Activated
2
|
Posted - 2014.02.09 23:36:00 -
[395] - Quote
bamp |
Varjac Theobroma Montenegro
Omega Elite Mercs INC.
125
|
Posted - 2014.02.10 03:49:00 -
[396] - Quote
Cough ( bump ) cough
FAME
|
I do SUCK
RETR0 PR0 GAMERS INTERGALACTIC WARPIGS
39
|
Posted - 2014.02.18 00:57:00 -
[397] - Quote
Yes +1
Scouts
May we forever live in infamy
And find our way into the darkness
no matter how difficult the road
-Matticus monk
|
Sum1ne Else
WASTELAND JUNK REMOVAL Top Men.
908
|
Posted - 2014.02.18 09:17:00 -
[398] - Quote
Lets play a game...
3 Word Story: copy and paste the last 3 words, then add 3 of your own...go!
They were all
Public Relations WJR
Its a leopleuradon Charlie a magical leoplueradon, its gunna guide our way to candy mountain!
|
KatanaPT
Tech Guard RISE of LEGION
455
|
Posted - 2014.02.18 11:19:00 -
[399] - Quote
+1 (i really want to kill my corpm8s on private matches...)
Tech Guard Recruiting Spot
|
Sum1ne Else
WASTELAND JUNK REMOVAL Top Men.
914
|
Posted - 2014.02.18 23:32:00 -
[400] - Quote
Public Relations WJR
Its a leopleuradon Charlie a magical leoplueradon, its gunna guide our way to candy mountain!
|
|
Draco Cerberus
BurgezzE.T.F General Tso's Alliance
846
|
Posted - 2014.02.19 00:20:00 -
[401] - Quote
This is turning into a very long list, CCP time to start looking into returning to something similar to Corp battles, maybe with the option to set up the battles in something similar to squad finder, but with a certain number of variables allow, ie sniper rifles only or tanks only to name a few, also perhaps larger and smaller team sizes and optional installations and objectives. Custom Battle and squad join options. Basically the arena you said you were thinking about and working on.
LogiGod earns his pips
|
843 Epidemic
BurgezzE.T.F General Tso's Alliance
740
|
Posted - 2014.03.31 20:26:00 -
[402] - Quote
Bump
*runs*
Twin brother of 843-BANE
|
Killar-12
OLDSPICE. Top Men.
2529
|
Posted - 2014.03.31 20:27:00 -
[403] - Quote
In light of Current Events this needs revisited...
Thunderdome is postponed until corp battles return please stop sending mails to me. QQ at CCP, not at me.
|
843 Epidemic
BurgezzE.T.F General Tso's Alliance
743
|
Posted - 2014.03.31 20:31:00 -
[404] - Quote
Killar-12 wrote:In light of Current Events this needs revisited...
Well we can hope that CCP is haaaard at work creating something that allllllll these players would love. Good thing we've got some research done in this thread for 'em, eh?
REVISIT THIS OLD GEM!
|
Derrith Erador
Arrogance.
1432
|
Posted - 2014.03.31 20:34:00 -
[405] - Quote
bump
The lone monk who traverses the treacherous worlds of New Eden in search of panty dropper songs.
Amarrican to the core.
|
Maximus Tarashara
Red Star. EoN.
37
|
Posted - 2014.04.01 18:48:00 -
[406] - Quote
mega dump
Also known as the pet shop owner of Red Star.
|
elric the enchanter
xCosmic Voidx Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
364
|
Posted - 2014.04.06 22:40:00 -
[407] - Quote
Thought I'd bump this because, as the director of corp containing a great bunch of 'casuals', I really feel we need the return of corp battles in some guise, to give us part-timers something more entertaining than public matches.
For example, our alliance had begun to participate in PFC... just before... well you know!
A few of our players got to play some great matches as part of the alliance, but we couldn't hope to go full-on into PC due to lives outside video gaming & can't be tied down by timers etc. So it's back to pub matches.
What I'm getting at is, a few of us 'vets' who remember playing corp battles still reminisce around the fireside, about how much fun it was, arranging matches with other corps we'd met in open beta & wanted to test ourselves against. Hell, we lost every time, but we had FUN!
I've seen several talented players drift away due to becoming tired of the same maps/game modes etc, yet who couldn't commit to a 'PC corp' due to only being casual players.
I believe the return of a player/corp organised contract where we could stipulate pre-agreed rules (for laughs), set our own contract amount and decide on times to better suit all concerned, would actually help to make the game entertaining for some of us again.
Let the elites fight over ficticious planets, let us fight against friends with dual plasma cannon wielding commandos!
(sorry for the novel!)
Cosmic Void Minister of Silly Weapons
Heinz Guderian predicted Tank514
|
843 Epidemic
BurgezzE.T.F General Tso's Alliance
1172
|
Posted - 2014.05.12 17:17:00 -
[408] - Quote
Ok CCP, I'm bringing this back.
Before after a long haul of this and that and spam and begging we finally got an answer from Hanz regarding this idea which temporarily made us go quiet. HOWEVER. In light of the recent news of Legion's release, I can hardly see why this would be a problem anymore.
These are the NEW reasons we need corp battles back:
- Dust's economy is obsolete now - Might as well, it's what we want and would not be difficult to incorporate at all. - It is already built, just need to re-implement it. - Allows corps to do something, may retain a portion of the player base - PC is broken, the economy is broken. As part of the PC 'fix' that has been promised, this would not be such a bad idea.
Brb, sister needs the TV
|
Ambiuris Zinum
EL Azteca Empire Amenaza Inminente
35
|
Posted - 2014.05.13 22:40:00 -
[409] - Quote
All the Latin corporations would also like to have corp battles back. It's part of what made this game fun for us in 1.0. Most of us are console players. We still like the game. Thank you CCP. |
Ambiuris Zinum
EL Azteca Empire Amenaza Inminente
35
|
Posted - 2014.05.28 20:17:00 -
[410] - Quote
What's up CCP. No Answer to this request yet ?? |
|
843 Epidemic
BurgezzE.T.F General Tso's Alliance
1458
|
Posted - 2014.07.15 15:28:00 -
[411] - Quote
Bump
PSN: Mudluck
843 HQ: www.843.enjin.com
Eat the Nephew
|
Anarchide
Greedy Bastards
2334
|
Posted - 2014.07.15 15:29:00 -
[412] - Quote
YOLO
CPM1 Underdog
Greedy Bastards
|
501st Headstrong
G0DS AM0NG MEN General Tso's Alliance
288
|
Posted - 2014.07.15 16:19:00 -
[413] - Quote
GODS AM0NG MEN would like to have Corp Battles back. I didn't even experience them when they first came around, I didn't have the game. We ring now mostly in PC, but it'd be nice to face off against some corps, and settle the stakes with others. Please consider this thread again. 07
From the Clone Wars I came. Here, I am a man among tamed beasts, and a god...among men.
CEO of G0DS AM0NG MEN
|
shaman oga
Nexus Balusa Horizon
2470
|
Posted - 2014.07.15 16:26:00 -
[414] - Quote
This post still alive? Of course bump.
PSN: ogamega
"Dust is full of communist who despise people with enough isk to buy expensive items"
|
Indy Strizer
Like A Moth To A Flame
151
|
Posted - 2014.07.15 19:35:00 -
[415] - Quote
I would like corp battles to return too. |
NoxMort3m
D.A.R.K L.E.G.I.O.N D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E
487
|
Posted - 2014.07.15 20:16:00 -
[416] - Quote
Bump
Director:Diplomat
Search DL514 to apply
|
JUDASisMYhomeboy
xCosmic Voidx Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
48
|
Posted - 2014.07.16 01:31:00 -
[417] - Quote
Ambiuris Zinum wrote:What's up CCP. No Answer to this request yet ?? I find the lack of a blue tag disturbing |
Gavr1lo Pr1nc1p
Fatal Absolution General Tso's Alliance
1397
|
Posted - 2014.07.16 02:11:00 -
[418] - Quote
Signed, and i am liking every post on here that supports your idea...got a long way to go
"Minmitar Scout" and "Masochist" are synonyms.
Kills-Archduke Ferd1nand
|
501st Headstrong
G0DS AM0NG MEN General Tso's Alliance
297
|
Posted - 2014.07.16 03:22:00 -
[419] - Quote
I did that this morning. Took me 34 minutes.
From the Clone Wars I came. Here, I am a man among tamed beasts, and a god...among men.
CEO of G0DS AM0NG MEN
|
I-Shayz-I
I----------I
4111
|
Posted - 2014.07.16 04:41:00 -
[420] - Quote
Just keep bumping
just keep bumping bumping bumping
7162 wp with a Repair Tool!
List of Legion Feedback Threads!
|
|
Dauth Jenkins
Merc-0107
552
|
Posted - 2014.07.16 05:57:00 -
[421] - Quote
Bump and signed
-Sincerely
--The Dual Swarm Commando
|
843 Epidemic
BurgezzE.T.F General Tso's Alliance
1471
|
Posted - 2014.07.16 11:23:00 -
[422] - Quote
Don't let the dream die, guys! <3
PSN: Mudluck
843 HQ: www.843.enjin.com
Eat the Nephew
|
Killar-12
The Exemplars Top Men.
2971
|
Posted - 2014.07.16 18:44:00 -
[423] - Quote
843 Epidemic wrote:Don't let the dream die, guys! <3 https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=2263775#post2263775 I won't try to.
I am an Idiot, and so are you!
|
Arkena Wyrnspire
Fatal Absolution
17626
|
Posted - 2014.09.10 19:44:00 -
[424] - Quote
Never let the dream die. /o/
Flying to new horizons.
|
TechMechMeds
KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION
5542
|
Posted - 2014.09.10 20:02:00 -
[425] - Quote
This would be so good to have back,
People could create actual teams and play without all the time consuming stuff that comes with pc.
My hometown beat Manchester united.
Git gud man utd.
4-0
|
Killar-12
The Corporate Raiders Top Men.
3290
|
Posted - 2014.09.10 20:52:00 -
[426] - Quote
Removing ISK from PC is the closest we'd get, and I'd enjoy to see it...
http://evil-guide.tripod.com/
|
843 Epidemic
BurgezzE.T.F General Tso's Alliance
1521
|
Posted - 2014.09.10 22:19:00 -
[427] - Quote
Keep going strong boys
PSN: Mudluck
843 HQ: www.843.enjin.com
Highest ever Thunderdome Win/Loss Title holder - 18-1
|
ACT1ON BASTARD
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
137
|
Posted - 2014.09.11 06:37:00 -
[428] - Quote
Wow the devs are trying their damndest to ignore this thread. There should be a forum rule 150 posts or likes = ccp has to respond. |
Killar-12
The Corporate Raiders Top Men.
3291
|
Posted - 2014.09.11 07:17:00 -
[429] - Quote
ACT1ON BASTARD wrote:Wow the devs are trying their damndest to ignore this thread. There should be a forum rule 150 posts or likes = ccp has to respond. 150 likes to the OP, maybe but those are usually like farming threads...
http://evil-guide.tripod.com/
|
Engelbert Plattfuss
United Pwnage Service RISE of LEGION
0
|
Posted - 2014.09.11 07:24:00 -
[430] - Quote
+1 keep it up. They-¦ll respond
2nd place in EU Squad Cup
UPS website http://www.ups-raven.com
|
|
g li2
Grupo de Asalto Chacal RISE of LEGION
145
|
Posted - 2014.09.11 07:39:00 -
[431] - Quote
I like it.
Only for training and fun
CHACALES
¡¡¡HONOR!!!
|
Ronan Elsword
Opus Arcana Covert Intervention
294
|
Posted - 2014.09.11 07:54:00 -
[432] - Quote
Would like it but doubt it will come anytime soon because I'm pretty sure it would need a client side update. Which CCP is avoiding at all cost.
Ode to the days before AA Hipfire was better than ads
|
ACT1ON BASTARD
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
137
|
Posted - 2014.09.11 08:07:00 -
[433] - Quote
Killar-12 wrote:ACT1ON BASTARD wrote:Wow the devs are trying their damndest to ignore this thread. There should be a forum rule 150 posts or likes = ccp has to respond. 150 likes to the OP, maybe but those are usually like farming threads... Doesnt matter make it 300. The devs gotta say something about corp battles already. Pcs stress me out, you stay at 1 point in 1 fit the whole match and if you lose youre losing millions and all that effort is just ridiculous. I just want a fun match where i can do my thing and not worry about losing an imaginary crop of land. I swear pc makes this game like a fukn job, you have to be on time, its not worth the effort to own a district unless youre 1 of those big corps with lots of pc ready players on. |
843 Epidemic
BurgezzE.T.F General Tso's Alliance
1521
|
Posted - 2014.09.11 10:06:00 -
[434] - Quote
ACT1ON BASTARD wrote:Killar-12 wrote:ACT1ON BASTARD wrote:Wow the devs are trying their damndest to ignore this thread. There should be a forum rule 150 posts or likes = ccp has to respond. 150 likes to the OP, maybe but those are usually like farming threads... Doesnt matter make it 300. The devs gotta say something about corp battles already. Pcs stress me out, you stay at 1 point in 1 fit the whole match and if you lose youre losing millions and all that effort is just ridiculous. I just want a fun match where i can do my thing and not worry about losing an imaginary crop of land. I swear pc makes this game like a fukn job, you have to be on time, its not worth the effort to own a district unless youre 1 of those big corps with lots of pc ready players on.
PC in a nutshell ^
PSN: Mudluck
843 HQ: www.843.enjin.com
Highest ever Thunderdome Win/Loss Title holder - 18-1
|
843 Epidemic
BurgezzE.T.F General Tso's Alliance
1521
|
Posted - 2014.09.11 10:07:00 -
[435] - Quote
CCP take this game very seriously (what I mean by this is Lore/logic > fun) and that's alright to an extent, but there's comes a point where it's like... guys, come on. It's a Playstation 3 game. Get over yourselves.
PSN: Mudluck
843 HQ: www.843.enjin.com
Highest ever Thunderdome Win/Loss Title holder - 18-1
|
Scar Scrilla
405
|
Posted - 2014.09.11 10:28:00 -
[436] - Quote
Why were Corp battles removed in first place? Nobody seems to know that. And CCP ignoring a thread like this is disrespectful, stubborn and unprofessional. I mean, this thread is several months old, has 22 pages, lots of likes but no blue tags...just plain stupid customer relations, as usual.
"Si tacuisses, philosophus mansisses"
" ... or grab a shotgun and REs." - UN1TE
|
Philox DuPont
EUROPEAN UN1ON
10
|
Posted - 2014.09.11 10:36:00 -
[437] - Quote
The Euopean Union officially supports the petition to reintroduce Corp battles. |
steadyhand amarr
shadows of 514
3295
|
Posted - 2014.09.11 11:11:00 -
[438] - Quote
Won't happen to introduce Corp battles would require a client side realease ccp has openly stated many times this will not happen. The dust 514 u have now is all you're getting
You can never have to many chaples
-Templar True adamance
|
Cavani1EE7
mmmh... ha
233
|
Posted - 2014.09.11 11:29:00 -
[439] - Quote
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEED. |
Jebus McKing
Legio DXIV
606
|
Posted - 2014.09.11 13:48:00 -
[440] - Quote
I think I've signed this already but I'm too lazy to find out for sure, so..
signed
I like everything about DUST514, except playing it. // @JebusMcKing
|
|
Alabastor 'TheBlaster' Alcar
Silver Bullet Solutions DARKSTAR ARMY
792
|
Posted - 2014.09.11 15:46:00 -
[441] - Quote
X |
843 Epidemic
BurgezzE.T.F General Tso's Alliance
1524
|
Posted - 2014.09.11 16:00:00 -
[442] - Quote
It of course is very unlikely - 99.9% unlikely - that corp battles will never be introduced back into Dust 514. BUT, this post should serve as a CONSTANT reminder that the community wants FUN. Maybe they'll remember this thread when creating and amending features in Legion.
Let's stop being serious CCP and let's be realistic instead. Your community wants a game they can enjoy, not a game that is a job. Not a game which prohibts them from having fun if they are not part of the 'elite'.
PSN: Mudluck
843 HQ: www.843.enjin.com
Highest ever Thunderdome Win/Loss Title holder - 18-1
|
Haerr
Legio DXIV
1372
|
Posted - 2014.09.13 14:42:00 -
[443] - Quote
Cavani1EE7 wrote:AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEED. +1 |
|
CCP Rattati
C C P C C P Alliance
7012
|
Posted - 2014.09.13 14:44:00 -
[444] - Quote
I can ask around.
"As well as stupid, Rattati is incredibly slow and accident-prone, and cannot even swim"
|
|
Himiko Kuronaga
Fatal Absolution General Tso's Alliance
4840
|
Posted - 2014.09.13 14:52:00 -
[445] - Quote
CCP puts corp battles back in the game and wastes all their manpower re-implementing this crap, and I guarantee you guys won't even use it beyond a month. |
Cat Merc
Onslaught Inc RISE of LEGION
12167
|
Posted - 2014.09.13 14:58:00 -
[446] - Quote
CCP Rattati wrote:I can ask around. And it only took 23 pages of a thread to get a reply
Feline overlord of all humans - CAT MERC
|
Shadow of War88
0uter.Heaven
450
|
Posted - 2014.09.13 14:59:00 -
[447] - Quote
+1
& justice for all
|
Shooter Somewhere
Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance
108
|
Posted - 2014.09.13 17:58:00 -
[448] - Quote
lolz
HEADSHOT! HEADSHOT!! HEADSHOT!!! HEADSHOT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=earCbU6vgAo
|
zzZaXxx
Vengeance Unbound
507
|
Posted - 2014.09.13 18:42:00 -
[449] - Quote
+1,000,000 |
a brackers
Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance
46
|
Posted - 2014.09.13 22:16:00 -
[450] - Quote
+1. It took 23 pages to get a single dust dev in here
Proto dropship pilot
The sandbox shooter
|
|
Ryme Intrinseca
Fatal Absolution General Tso's Alliance
1814
|
Posted - 2014.09.13 22:19:00 -
[451] - Quote
a brackers wrote:+1. It took 23 pages to get a single dust dev in here To be fair, that is 50% of the dev team |
NoExsplosionsMgee
Rebels New Republic INTERGALACTIC WARPIGS
258
|
Posted - 2014.09.14 03:53:00 -
[452] - Quote
+1 and signed!
PRAISE THE SUN!! \ |Gö¼|' /
|
Apocalyptic Destroyer
Sebiestor Field Sappers Minmatar Republic
127
|
Posted - 2014.09.14 05:35:00 -
[453] - Quote
+100000 This is great stuff.
~R1P
|
deezy dabest
IMPERIAL SPECIAL FORCES GROUP
986
|
Posted - 2014.09.14 09:00:00 -
[454] - Quote
Have a look at my thread proposing a system for Corp Battles.
https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=2220924#post2220924 |
Sequal Rise
Les Desanusseurs
41
|
Posted - 2014.09.14 10:31:00 -
[455] - Quote
Probably the best suggestion here! +100000 Male this happen ccp!
Sorry for my bad english ^^
|
Gorton's Fisherman
D3ATH C4RD
0
|
Posted - 2014.09.14 11:03:00 -
[456] - Quote
+1 |
843 Epidemic
BurgezzE.T.F General Tso's Alliance
1532
|
Posted - 2014.09.14 11:27:00 -
[457] - Quote
CCP Rattati wrote:I can ask around.
Awesome man, thank you for the response.
This is why everyone in the community loves you.
PSN: Mudluck
843 HQ: www.843.enjin.com
Highest ever Thunderdome Win/Loss Title holder - 18-1
|
Zeke Dunevent
Meeeow.
14
|
Posted - 2014.09.14 16:08:00 -
[458] - Quote
+1 bump
MEEEOW are sauce bosses!!!
I can run just about anything.
|
Dust User
KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION
618
|
Posted - 2014.09.14 17:40:00 -
[459] - Quote
Himiko Kuronaga wrote:CCP puts corp battles back in the game and wastes all their manpower re-implementing this crap, and I guarantee you guys won't even use it beyond a month.
Agreed. |
843 Epidemic
BurgezzE.T.F General Tso's Alliance
1535
|
Posted - 2014.09.14 18:19:00 -
[460] - Quote
Dust User wrote:Himiko Kuronaga wrote:CCP puts corp battles back in the game and wastes all their manpower re-implementing this crap, and I guarantee you guys won't even use it beyond a month. Agreed.
You're talking as if Dust has any kind of future regardless of this element of the game.
PSN: Mudluck
843 HQ: www.843.enjin.com
Highest ever Thunderdome Win/Loss Title holder - 18-1
|
|
Himiko Kuronaga
Fatal Absolution General Tso's Alliance
4846
|
Posted - 2014.09.14 18:26:00 -
[461] - Quote
843 Epidemic wrote:Dust User wrote:Himiko Kuronaga wrote:CCP puts corp battles back in the game and wastes all their manpower re-implementing this crap, and I guarantee you guys won't even use it beyond a month. Agreed. You're talking as if Dust has any kind of future regardless of this element of the game.
Oh, you're right. It doesn't.
This is more of a slam to the player base for wanting such a stupid feature they are just going to ignore. I mean realistically you guys are just wasting some employee's time he could be spending on stuff that would actually get more use. Or Legion stuff. |
Maiden selena MORTIMOR
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
178
|
Posted - 2014.09.15 01:09:00 -
[462] - Quote
Obviously +100000000Gé¬00Gé¬000Gé¬Gé¬00Gé¬0
no im not a mortedeamor alt..im her slave
When my master is banned I represent her wishes and that of the Mortimor famil
|
Alabastor 'TheBlaster' Alcar
Silver Bullet Solutions DARKSTAR ARMY
793
|
Posted - 2014.09.15 02:29:00 -
[463] - Quote
we want wager battles based off the old corp battles system, it could be put under the other contracts window in the battle finder since we never get to use that anyway. planetary conquest is way to exclusive for new or small groups to participate, with wager battles gear usage will depend on the amount wagered by each corp, winner takes all minus taxes to ccp |
843 Epidemic
BurgezzE.T.F General Tso's Alliance
1535
|
Posted - 2014.09.15 10:34:00 -
[464] - Quote
Himiko Kuronaga wrote:843 Epidemic wrote:Dust User wrote:Himiko Kuronaga wrote:CCP puts corp battles back in the game and wastes all their manpower re-implementing this crap, and I guarantee you guys won't even use it beyond a month. Agreed. You're talking as if Dust has any kind of future regardless of this element of the game. Oh, you're right. It doesn't. This is more of a slam to the player base for wanting such a stupid feature they are just going to ignore. I mean realistically you guys are just wasting some employee's time he could be spending on stuff that would actually get more use. Or Legion stuff.
It no longer affects me if this is or isn't implemented, I made this thread a long time ago before Dust was announced as obsolete. If people are still demanding something they've always wanted, good for them. I don't even play anymore, for god's sake
PSN: Mudluck
843 HQ: www.843.enjin.com
Highest ever Thunderdome Win/Loss Title holder - 18-1
|
BlastaMasta89
ICE-9 PROJECT
12
|
Posted - 2014.09.15 11:11:00 -
[465] - Quote
+signed
Director of ICE-9 PROJECT
|
Dust User
KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION
625
|
Posted - 2014.09.15 23:28:00 -
[466] - Quote
Alabastor 'TheBlaster' Alcar wrote:planetary conquest is way to exclusive for new or small groups to participate
Not anymore. It's hard to even give a district away these days. |
tripsykon
Academy Inferno E-R-A
36
|
Posted - 2014.09.16 08:01:00 -
[467] - Quote
Arkena Wyrnspire wrote:Yes, yes, yes, and also yes. Also, yes yes and yes.
I say yes too! 100500 times! Bring it back!
|
Breakin Stuff
Goonfeet Special Planetary Emergency Response Group
2789
|
Posted - 2014.09.16 09:51:00 -
[468] - Quote
Can we get team matches WITHOUT the idiotic buy-in mechanic?
Seriously we want to kill each other. Paying for the privilege is asinine. |
Killar-12
The Corporate Raiders Top Men.
3295
|
Posted - 2014.09.16 18:12:00 -
[469] - Quote
CCP Rattati wrote:I can ask around. pull ISK from PC, much less Dev time much more end result...
http://evil-guide.tripod.com/
|
Sylwester Dziewiecki
Interregnum.
365
|
Posted - 2014.09.16 22:15:00 -
[470] - Quote
+1
Gallente Speed Scout.
EVE side of me: Nosum Hseebnrido
|
|
Zeke Dunevent
Meeeow.
15
|
Posted - 2014.09.17 03:17:00 -
[471] - Quote
843 Epidemic wrote:Dust User wrote:Himiko Kuronaga wrote:CCP puts corp battles back in the game and wastes all their manpower re-implementing this crap, and I guarantee you guys won't even use it beyond a month. Agreed. You're talking as if Dust has any kind of future regardless of this element of the game.
Don't say that. Despite all of its faults Dust has still managed to be my favorite FPS, and I'm hoping that eventually there will be a resurgence in the players that left! It may be a daft notion but hey I can hope. (Plus there's always the possibility that Project Legion will eventually come to the PS4. Fingers-crossed!)
MEEEOW are sauce bosses!!!
I can run just about anything.
|
Killar-12
The Corporate Raiders Top Men.
3297
|
Posted - 2014.09.17 03:57:00 -
[472] - Quote
What Himiko Said is dead nuts on... but who am I to say anything... Then again when has he been wrong... seriously find me an instance when he doesn't make an excelent point.
http://evil-guide.tripod.com/
|
jace silencerww
Inner.Hell
47
|
Posted - 2014.09.17 04:25:00 -
[473] - Quote
YAY! great idea I loved corp battles so much fun and easy to plan. |
843 Epidemic
BurgezzE.T.F General Tso's Alliance
1535
|
Posted - 2014.09.17 09:12:00 -
[474] - Quote
Killar-12 wrote:What Himiko Said is dead nuts on... but who am I to say anything... Then again when has he been wrong... seriously find me an instance when he doesn't make an excelent point.
Of course he makes an excellent point, but two things:
1) On a personal level idc what happens anymore, I don't play seriously like I used to. On twice a week at most.
2) Maybe this will act as a signal to the Legion developers. Who knows?
Either way, we know that at the end of the day CCP will do whatever they want to do, and they're not as dumb all the time as people make out, they'll make a good decision.
For now we can just continue, because why not?
PSN: Mudluck
843 HQ: www.843.enjin.com
Highest ever Thunderdome Win/Loss Title holder - 18-1
|
Jebus McKing
Legio DXIV
658
|
Posted - 2014.09.21 23:04:00 -
[475] - Quote
Damn, I keep forgetting if I signed this already or not...
...anyway
/signed
You have to post numbers and math to be taken seriously. // @JebusMcKing
|
Joan Reguera
Inmortales LLC Dark Taboo
17
|
Posted - 2014.10.01 14:55:00 -
[476] - Quote
Excellent idea... +1
So I dub the Unforgiven
|
shaman oga
The Dunwich Horror
2979
|
Posted - 2014.11.03 10:56:00 -
[477] - Quote
Bumpity bump
With my friend FOTM Duke
|
Spectral Clone
Abandoned Privilege Top Men.
3003
|
Posted - 2014.11.03 11:34:00 -
[478] - Quote
Necro thread alive.
EVE: Legion, also known as: Schroedinger's Game, EVE: Limbo, or just "Not-a-game-yet".
|
Draco Cerberus
BurgezzE.T.F General Tso's Alliance
918
|
Posted - 2015.01.24 23:33:00 -
[479] - Quote
Corp battles were fun especially for us necros
Can we have an ETA on Legion please, don't want to buy a computer till I know what I need to run this
|
emm kay
Direct Action Resources
238
|
Posted - 2015.01.25 00:11:00 -
[480] - Quote
+1
There is a reason you never see me in battle.
it's because I see you first.
|
|
shaman oga
Dead Man's Game
4148
|
Posted - 2015.01.25 00:20:00 -
[481] - Quote
I guess raiding will be a good option. Let's see what we are going to get on February.
This does't mean stop necromancy.
Pimp my Barge
|
843-BANE
BurgezzE.T.F General Tso's Alliance
1408
|
Posted - 2015.03.13 06:51:00 -
[482] - Quote
Still alive? Dayum
Director // BurgezzE.T.F // 843
Remember, there might be some momentary discomfort.
|
Reign Omega
T.H.I.R.D R.O.C.K RISE of LEGION
1304
|
Posted - 2015.03.13 06:57:00 -
[483] - Quote
843-BANE wrote:Still alive? Dayum
You shut your dirty mouth! Lol how ya been man? Bout time for you to come back yeah?
Mark a$$ tricks, and bags of dicks....
|
843-BANE
BurgezzE.T.F General Tso's Alliance
1408
|
Posted - 2015.03.13 06:58:00 -
[484] - Quote
Reign Omega wrote:843-BANE wrote:Still alive? Dayum You shut your dirty mouth! Lol how ya been man? Bout time for you to come back yeah?
Haha I've been good bro returned from my travels just yesterday! How are you, what's new??
Director // BurgezzE.T.F // 843
Remember, there might be some momentary discomfort.
|
Reign Omega
T.H.I.R.D R.O.C.K RISE of LEGION
1304
|
Posted - 2015.03.13 07:02:00 -
[485] - Quote
843-BANE wrote:Reign Omega wrote:843-BANE wrote:Still alive? Dayum You shut your dirty mouth! Lol how ya been man? Bout time for you to come back yeah? Haha I've been good bro returned from my travels just yesterday! How are you, what's new??
Right on! Getting all worldly and that? Same old cranky reign over here. Playing when I can, working a lot, and still wondering why this feature hasn't been implemented. TR just got into PCs about a month ago so I'm trying to get down with more of those, but scheduling. ...
Mark a$$ tricks, and bags of dicks....
|
843-BANE
BurgezzE.T.F General Tso's Alliance
1410
|
Posted - 2015.03.13 16:49:00 -
[486] - Quote
Reign Omega wrote:843-BANE wrote:Reign Omega wrote:843-BANE wrote:Still alive? Dayum You shut your dirty mouth! Lol how ya been man? Bout time for you to come back yeah? Haha I've been good bro returned from my travels just yesterday! How are you, what's new?? Right on! Getting all worldly and that? Same old cranky reign over here. Playing when I can, working a lot, and still wondering why this feature hasn't been implemented. TR just got into PCs about a month ago so I'm trying to get down with more of those, but scheduling. ...
Good to hear you're alright man, hope your clan is treating you well. Certainly a little more worldly than I was ;)
Thought I'd check out the old forums to see if anyone's still kicking!
Director // BurgezzE.T.F // 843
Remember, there might be some momentary discomfort.
|
7 Djin
The Hundred Acre Hood RISE of LEGION
54
|
Posted - 2015.03.13 16:58:00 -
[487] - Quote
Signed in agreement |
John Mocahn
BurgezzE.T.F General Tso's Alliance
457
|
Posted - 2015.03.18 22:38:00 -
[488] - Quote
Reign Omega wrote:843-BANE wrote:Reign Omega wrote:843-BANE wrote:Still alive? Dayum You shut your dirty mouth! Lol how ya been man? Bout time for you to come back yeah? Haha I've been good bro returned from my travels just yesterday! How are you, what's new?? Right on! Getting all worldly and that? Same old cranky reign over here. Playing when I can, working a lot, and still wondering why this feature hasn't been implemented. TR just got into PCs about a month ago so I'm trying to get down with more of those, but scheduling. ... Reign....you suck <3
843 Sergeant
Alts: Coram Iudice (Gal Assault) , Zer0-Zer0 (Tank)
BurgezzE.T.F
|
Reign Omega
T.H.I.R.D R.O.C.K
1321
|
Posted - 2015.03.19 01:02:00 -
[489] - Quote
John Mocahn wrote:Reign Omega wrote:843-BANE wrote:Reign Omega wrote:843-BANE wrote:Still alive? Dayum You shut your dirty mouth! Lol how ya been man? Bout time for you to come back yeah? Haha I've been good bro returned from my travels just yesterday! How are you, what's new?? Right on! Getting all worldly and that? Same old cranky reign over here. Playing when I can, working a lot, and still wondering why this feature hasn't been implemented. TR just got into PCs about a month ago so I'm trying to get down with more of those, but scheduling. ... Reign....you suck <3
Johnny Depp! /(**)
Mark a$$ tricks, and bags of dicks....
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 :: [one page] |