|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Killar-12
The Corporate Raiders
Top Men.
2040
   |
Posted - 2014.01.21 21:54:00 -
[1] - Quote
Darken-Soul wrote:Everyone wants this except CCP. why not?
Because Corp battles will hurt PC if not kill it outright because PC is a horrible Idea that either needs removed or radically reworked requiring activity or action to make ISK
but they need returned... badly
A-Teams win Battles B-Teams win Campaigns C-Teams win Wars
|
Killar-12
The Corporate Raiders
Top Men.
2053
|
Posted - 2014.01.22 20:39:00 -
[2] - Quote
Here here for CB's!
A-Teams win Battles B-Teams win Campaigns C-Teams win Wars
|
Killar-12
The Corporate Raiders
Top Men.
2053
|
Posted - 2014.01.22 21:14:00 -
[3] - Quote
Marad''er wrote:843-BANE wrote:Marad''er wrote:843-BANE wrote:Marad''er wrote:Back to the top Need to talk to you in game when you're next on Why? Favour to ask :D Want me to ring? That's all I can do. If you want directors though you gotta talk to zaria, mj, or doc
Hmm I've got a favor but I'll get Zaria and Get Ramp as I need something that AE (well Renegade in general...) has... in exchange for something we have.. not what you'd expect same deal with 843 and the other PD corps
A-Teams win Battles B-Teams win Campaigns C-Teams win Wars
|
Killar-12
The Corporate Raiders
Top Men.
2053
|
Posted - 2014.01.22 21:20:00 -
[4] - Quote
843-BANE wrote:
What are you talking about? I just want to talk to him about something to do with this thread, leave anything else outta this thread man that's all this is about.
BUMP
Sorry neither of you use IRC and I don't know either of your skypes... I prefer to keep this stuff private, it's not above top secret but I don't like the Trolls here... I'll be available Saturday or Sunday or in the late night Thursday and Friday. I guess I does relate to getting CBs back just in-case it doesn't come next patch... and many other things.
A-Teams win Battles B-Teams win Campaigns C-Teams win Wars
|
Killar-12
The Corporate Raiders
Top Men.
2053
|
Posted - 2014.01.22 21:25:00 -
[5] - Quote
843-BANE wrote:Killar-12 wrote:843-BANE wrote:
What are you talking about? I just want to talk to him about something to do with this thread, leave anything else outta this thread man that's all this is about.
BUMP
Sorry neither of you use IRC and I don't know either of your skypes... I prefer to keep this stuff private, it's not above top secret but I don't like the Trolls here... I'll be available Saturday or Sunday or in the late night Thursday and Friday. I guess I does relate to getting CBs back just in-case it doesn't come next patch... and many other things. If you ever need to talk to me, come to www.843.enjin.com and I'll be there :)
Oh? if it's private then great, I've got class in 36 mins and have to get to campus, I'll be back in 3 hours and 15-20 mins
A-Teams win Battles B-Teams win Campaigns C-Teams win Wars
|
Killar-12
The Corporate Raiders
Top Men.
2054
|
Posted - 2014.01.23 03:44:00 -
[6] - Quote
Numinacer wrote:Killar-12 wrote:Darken-Soul wrote:Everyone wants this except CCP. why not? Because Corp battles will hurt PC if not kill it outright because PC is a horrible Idea that either needs removed or radically reworked requiring activity or action to make ISK but they need returned... badly I don't see how this would kill, or even put a dent into p/c battles. If anything it would strengthen it. Now you have to train your guys in public matches, which isn't always a good idea. Once corps trained their guys in this attacks would happen more often with a better faith in your team seen in these battles. I say DO IT CCP FOR THE DUSTERS SAKE!!! +1
I'll guarentee I can make a profit doing CBs, PC is an meaningless broken game mode in which the only 2 ways to make ISK are to Hire Ringers or lock districts...
A-Teams win Battles B-Teams win Campaigns C-Teams win Wars
|
Killar-12
The Corporate Raiders
Top Men.
2054
|
Posted - 2014.01.23 03:57:00 -
[7] - Quote
Numinacer wrote:Killar-12 wrote:Numinacer wrote:Killar-12 wrote:Darken-Soul wrote:Everyone wants this except CCP. why not? Because Corp battles will hurt PC if not kill it outright because PC is a horrible Idea that either needs removed or radically reworked requiring activity or action to make ISK but they need returned... badly I don't see how this would kill, or even put a dent into p/c battles. If anything it would strengthen it. Now you have to train your guys in public matches, which isn't always a good idea. Once corps trained their guys in this attacks would happen more often with a better faith in your team seen in these battles. I say DO IT CCP FOR THE DUSTERS SAKE!!! +1 I'll guarentee I can make a profit doing CBs, PC is an meaningless broken game mode in which the only 2 ways to make ISK are to Hire Ringers or lock districts... I feel like everyone who hates pc either A. constantly loses or B. Their corp won't let them do them. I'm not saying that's why you hate them killar, but whatever reason you want corp battles back I agree with it.
Then a toast... to corp battles an a bump...
A-Teams win Battles B-Teams win Campaigns C-Teams win Wars
|
Killar-12
The Corporate Raiders
Top Men.
2074
|
Posted - 2014.01.24 20:14:00 -
[8] - Quote
843-BANE wrote:KenKaniff69 wrote:Why no blue tag? They REALLY don't want to acknowledge this. The CPM also refuse to comment directly.
Sometimes it's better to NOT comment and not stir up anything even good news can be better kept quiet.
A-Teams win Battles B-Teams win Campaigns C-Teams win Wars
|
Killar-12
The Corporate Raiders
Top Men.
2082
|
Posted - 2014.01.25 20:38:00 -
[9] - Quote
GVGMODE wrote:Let's be honest if we want to help small corps train a 16vs16 it would be very difficult for them to field them and on top of that many corporations would not want to field their 16 against randoms.
Therefore, it would be important for CCP to allow the contract issuer to set size on their own terms (8vs8 and 16vs16).
Maybe gamemode and some other things too..
A-Teams win Battles B-Teams win Campaigns C-Teams win Wars
|
Killar-12
The Corporate Raiders
Top Men.
2102
|
Posted - 2014.01.27 15:19:00 -
[10] - Quote
Bad Cheetah wrote:I'm ashamed at the Devs here. You know this thread has been read, you know they have to read it to check for anything inappropriate. A simple reply that says it's been brought to the higher ups, it's in the works, whatever, would be GREATLY appreciated and rewarding to both yourselves and your business. As it stands now, it seems like the cries from your paying customers are not being responded to. Shame on you CCP, if the people that matter actually speak enough English to read this.
Let's see if that last comment gets a little reply ;)
Look at the armor thread it never got a dev response but look at the changes it caused.
A-Teams win Battles B-Teams win Campaigns C-Teams win Wars
|
|
|
Killar-12
The Corporate Raiders
Top Men.
2109
|
Posted - 2014.01.28 06:06:00 -
[11] - Quote
843-BANE wrote:Benjamin Ciscko wrote:Would be cool if a corp could host a tourney w/ betting and such through Corp Battles perhaps even a mode with that effect. We did have tournaments with corp battles, they were awesome I remember fighting in them.
I'll hold Thunderdome if I don't have to fight the logistical nightmare that is PC
Also I might be interested in running a tourney I've got a decent amount of ISK
A-Teams win Battles B-Teams win Campaigns C-Teams win Wars
|
Killar-12
The Corporate Raiders
Top Men.
2123
|
Posted - 2014.01.30 00:43:00 -
[12] - Quote
Bravo to hans... might be the cold meds but you toss us any two of these in the next build and you'll get a great response
PvE
CBs
Heavily Reworked academy/tutorial
A plan (nothing concrete but at the pace we're going that plan will look badass)
EWAR
Racial Vehicles (and Turrets)
Racial Heavy Weapons
Promise of Release on PS4 in 2014-2015 (hell even 2016 if we get a year)
A-Teams win Battles B-Teams win Campaigns C-Teams win Wars
|
Killar-12
The Corporate Raiders
Top Men.
2125
|
Posted - 2014.01.30 21:18:00 -
[13] - Quote
Marad''er wrote:Iron Wolf Saber wrote:843 nerfnut96 wrote: BURGEZZ LISTEN UP!I don't want any more hostility here. We can discus our views and opinions about what went on here on our own site. You may by all means continue to support and reply to this thread but do not continue this argument, arguing with the devs won't change anything for the better. The next member of burgezz to attack or disrespect the CPM or CCP on this thread or any other will be disciplined. Thank you, Moving forward we have to recognize that this will be calling for a new feature not an old one. So taking that opportunity to start "with a clean slate" on how to make this feature fun how would you go about it? The 'if you could design it' sort of thinking here and we'll try to work out issues as we imagine them. Tbh, I don't think there was anything bad with the "old feature" There was no "no showing" as it would be pointless to accept the contract if you were going to no show. Both sides made a bet. Winner took the pot. It was pretty good. Only problem now looking back at it, I don't think their should be eve support. As eve support should be for PC. I also think there should be a hard cap of how much isk can be bet. Also, I think you should be able to choose how many players can be in the battle. A sort of slider maybe? I also believe that no isk should be made to individuals in the battle. Only the corp should receive the isk amount that both sides put in first.
tbqh I remeber fondly PRO vs PFBHz and if FWA vs whomever happens I'll be happy. seriously say if Kujo fucks up and AE's corp wallet's on the line I'll hire N-F to get that ISK into the TCR pot and a decent chunk to find it's way back to N-F
A-Teams win Battles B-Teams win Campaigns C-Teams win Wars
|
Killar-12
The Corporate Raiders
Top Men.
2133
|
Posted - 2014.01.31 20:16:00 -
[14] - Quote
Marad''er wrote:Killar-12 wrote:Marad''er wrote:Iron Wolf Saber wrote:843 nerfnut96 wrote:BURGEZZ LISTEN UP!I don't want any more hostility here. We can discus our views and opinions about what went on here on our own site. You may by all means continue to support and reply to this thread but do not continue this argument, arguing with the devs won't change anything for the better. The next member of burgezz to attack or disrespect the CPM or CCP on this thread or any other will be disciplined. Thank you, Moving forward we have to recognize that this will be calling for a new feature not an old one. So taking that opportunity to start "with a clean slate" on how to make this feature fun how would you go about it? The 'if you could design it' sort of thinking here and we'll try to work out issues as we imagine them. Tbh, I don't think there was anything bad with the "old feature" There was no "no showing" as it would be pointless to accept the contract if you were going to no show. Both sides made a bet. Winner took the pot. It was pretty good. Only problem now looking back at it, I don't think their should be eve support. As eve support should be for PC. I also think there should be a hard cap of how much isk can be bet. Also, I think you should be able to choose how many players can be in the battle. A sort of slider maybe? I also believe that no isk should be made to individuals in the battle. Only the corp should receive the isk amount that both sides put in first. tbqh I remeber fondly PRO vs PFBHz and if FWA vs whomever happens I'll be happy. seriously say if Kujo fucks up and AE's corp wallet's on the line I'll hire N-F to get that ISK into the TCR pot and a decent chunk to find it's way back to N-F Our corp wallets empty... Kujo steals most of it every week after pay checks :P (Bump)
looks at Nyain well that's always 2 in the morning...
A-Teams win Battles B-Teams win Campaigns C-Teams win Wars
|
Killar-12
The Corporate Raiders
Top Men.
2210
|
Posted - 2014.02.05 02:19:00 -
[15] - Quote
Bumpski
Listen
I'll change the song every week
|
Killar-12
OLDSPICE.
Top Men.
2529
|
Posted - 2014.03.31 20:27:00 -
[16] - Quote
In light of Current Events this needs revisited...
Thunderdome is postponed until corp battles return please stop sending mails to me. QQ at CCP, not at me.
|
Killar-12
The Exemplars
Top Men.
2971
|
Posted - 2014.07.16 18:44:00 -
[17] - Quote
843 Epidemic wrote:Don't let the dream die, guys! <3
https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=2263775#post2263775
I won't try to.
I am an Idiot, and so are you!
|
Killar-12
The Corporate Raiders
Top Men.
3290
|
Posted - 2014.09.10 20:52:00 -
[18] - Quote
Removing ISK from PC is the closest we'd get, and I'd enjoy to see it...
http://evil-guide.tripod.com/
|
Killar-12
The Corporate Raiders
Top Men.
3291
|
Posted - 2014.09.11 07:17:00 -
[19] - Quote
ACT1ON BASTARD wrote:Wow the devs are trying their damndest to ignore this thread. There should be a forum rule 150 posts or likes = ccp has to respond.
150 likes to the OP, maybe but those are usually like farming threads...
http://evil-guide.tripod.com/
|
Killar-12
The Corporate Raiders
Top Men.
3295
|
Posted - 2014.09.16 18:12:00 -
[20] - Quote
CCP Rattati wrote:I can ask around.
pull ISK from PC, much less Dev time much more end result...
http://evil-guide.tripod.com/
|
|
|
Killar-12
The Corporate Raiders
Top Men.
3297
|
Posted - 2014.09.17 03:57:00 -
[21] - Quote
What Himiko Said is dead nuts on... but who am I to say anything... Then again when has he been wrong... seriously find me an instance when he doesn't make an excelent point.
http://evil-guide.tripod.com/
|
|
|
| |
|