DUST Search - Petition to Bring back Corp battles

All Channels

General Discussions

Petition to Bring back Corp battles

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 1 post(s)
Gelhad Thremyr Quebec United The CORVOS 14	Posted - 2014.01.25 03:02:00 - [211] - Quote One two tree four, give me a bump for more ...
P14GU3 The Southern Legion The Umbra Combine 514	Posted - 2014.01.25 05:00:00 - [212] - Quote Meh too lazy to supply info on site, but /signed
843-BANE BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder. 561	Posted - 2014.01.25 10:50:00 - [213] - Quote There are so many corporations out there I KNOW that struggle to afford 1 PC a week because they're members have to grind everytime to pay for it. With corp battles back everyone could be have as many fights as they like every night!! BRING BACK CORP BATTLES SIGN THE PEITION HERE
X7 lion Swamp Tempo Canis Eliminatus Operatives 81	Posted - 2014.01.25 15:49:00 - [214] - Quote why not.
843-BANE BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder. 563	Posted - 2014.01.25 15:53:00 - [215] - Quote Bump BRING BACK CORP BATTLES SIGN THE PEITION HERE
843-BANE BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder. 563	Posted - 2014.01.25 16:23:00 - [216] - Quote Bump BRING BACK CORP BATTLES SIGN THE PEITION HERE
Benjamin Ciscko The Generals General Tso's Alliance 1346	Posted - 2014.01.25 16:28:00 - [217] - Quote What about different modes 6vs.6, 8vs.8, 12vs.12, 16vs.16 that way small corps who may only have 10 players on at peek time can train while bringing up their numbers and even big corps can focus on squad build up/ cohesion. Corps can also focus on holding two points without being over whelmed by a 5 point map. Caldari Tanker/Minmatar Assault Forum warrior lvl 1
843-BANE BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder. 563	Posted - 2014.01.25 16:38:00 - [218] - Quote Benjamin Ciscko wrote: What about different modes 6vs.6, 8vs.8, 12vs.12, 16vs.16 that way small corps who may only have 10 players on at peek time can train while bringing up their numbers and even big corps can focus on squad build up/ cohesion. Corps can also focus on holding two points without being over whelmed by a 5 point map. Another great idea!! Might be a little complex for CCP to handle setting up a toggle option, but it's a good idea! Come on CCP, seriously. BRING BACK CORP BATTLES SIGN THE PEITION HERE
Text Grant Death Firm. Canis Eliminatus Operatives 320	Posted - 2014.01.25 17:11:00 - [219] - Quote 843-BANE wrote: Benjamin Ciscko wrote: What about different modes 6vs.6, 8vs.8, 12vs.12, 16vs.16 that way small corps who may only have 10 players on at peek time can train while bringing up their numbers and even big corps can focus on squad build up/ cohesion. Corps can also focus on holding two points without being over whelmed by a 5 point map. Another great idea!! Might be a little complex for CCP to handle setting up a toggle option, but it's a good idea! Come on CCP, seriously. Sounds good. I'm all for a mode with only militia and basic gear only and no vehicles too
Haerr Molon Labe. Public Disorder. 194	Posted - 2014.01.25 17:19:00 - [220] - Quote +1 @CCP: Is the Cloaking Fields and Profile Dampeners reduction to Scan Profile stacking penalized when added together?

843-BANE BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder. 566	Posted - 2014.01.25 17:19:00 - [221] - Quote Bump BRING BACK CORP BATTLES SIGN THE PEITION HERE
GVGMODE WorstPlayersEver 118	Posted - 2014.01.25 17:34:00 - [222] - Quote Let's be honest if we want to help small corps train a 16vs16 it would be very difficult for them to field them and on top of that many corporations would not want to field their 16 against randoms. Therefore, it would be important for CCP to allow the contract issuer to set size on their own terms (8vs8 and 16vs16).
Killar-12 The Corporate Raiders Top Men. 2082	Posted - 2014.01.25 20:38:00 - [223] - Quote GVGMODE wrote: Let's be honest if we want to help small corps train a 16vs16 it would be very difficult for them to field them and on top of that many corporations would not want to field their 16 against randoms. Therefore, it would be important for CCP to allow the contract issuer to set size on their own terms (8vs8 and 16vs16). Maybe gamemode and some other things too.. A-Teams win Battles B-Teams win Campaigns C-Teams win Wars
843-BANE BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder. 569	Posted - 2014.01.25 22:02:00 - [224] - Quote Bump! Don't slack on the bumps D: BRING BACK CORP BATTLES SIGN THE PEITION HERE
Benjamin Ciscko The Generals General Tso's Alliance 1355	Posted - 2014.01.25 22:25:00 - [225] - Quote 843-BANE wrote: Bump! Don't slack on the bumps D: Your going to get it locked. Caldari Tanker/Minmatar Assault Forum warrior lvl 1
843-BANE BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder. 569	Posted - 2014.01.25 22:26:00 - [226] - Quote Benjamin Ciscko wrote: 843-BANE wrote: Bump! Don't slack on the bumps D: Your going to get it locked. Bring it on BRING BACK CORP BATTLES SIGN THE PEITION HERE
843-BANE BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder. 569	Posted - 2014.01.25 22:38:00 - [227] - Quote Bump. BRING BACK CORP BATTLES SIGN THE PEITION HERE
Reign Omega BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder. 112	Posted - 2014.01.25 23:10:00 - [228] - Quote It would be nice to be able to select game mode, size, friendly fire, even maps/sockets....I know the first step is simply, bringing the mode itself back and then fine tuning it, but from there many options present themselves.
843-BANE BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder. 570	Posted - 2014.01.26 00:24:00 - [229] - Quote Bump BRING BACK CORP BATTLES SIGN THE PEITION HERE
KenKaniff69 Fatal Absolution Covert Intervention 1946	Posted - 2014.01.26 01:23:00 - [230] - Quote I see no reason why there shouldn't be a blue post on this. So about those vehicle locks...

843-BANE BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder. 572	Posted - 2014.01.26 01:32:00 - [231] - Quote KenKaniff69 wrote: I see no reason why there shouldn't be a blue post on this. Exactly. Me neither. BRING BACK CORP BATTLES SIGN THE PEITION HERE
Yokal Bob G.R.A.V.E INTERGALACTIC WARPIGS 302	Posted - 2014.01.26 01:44:00 - [232] - Quote Here is the question, if corp battles were returned, who here would still partake in PC? Im all for corp battles as i hope it enhances the activity in planetary conquest. CPM1 candidate
NoxMort3m D.A.R.K L.E.G.I.O.N D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E 303	Posted - 2014.01.26 03:59:00 - [233] - Quote I agree with everything except the individual mercs payout, loot and isk for the individual should be around 60% of what pc battles are like. Corp battles get Beast,i miss the fun Director: Diplomat Search DL514 to apply, include some character details
843-BANE BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder. 574	Posted - 2014.01.26 10:16:00 - [234] - Quote More and more people agree BRING BACK CORP BATTLES SIGN THE PEITION HERE
843-BANE BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder. 574	Posted - 2014.01.26 11:53:00 - [235] - Quote CCP? BRING BACK CORP BATTLES SIGN THE PEITION HERE
843-BANE BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder. 576	Posted - 2014.01.26 15:06:00 - [236] - Quote CCP where are you? BRING BACK CORP BATTLES SIGN THE PEITION HERE
RemingtonBeaver Molon Labe. Public Disorder. 69	Posted - 2014.01.26 15:18:00 - [237] - Quote Wow , I didn't know this was a thing. Thanks for the bimpity bump. I agree with Bane here. This needs to be a thing. Smaller corps need to fight. CCP could make it an ISK sink if it'll quantify it. Make the two teams pay in and say the payout is 80% to the winners and 20% goes to the New Eden Parks and Recreation Department. It'd be worth it to the winners and excellent experience to the losers. And anyone willing to put up the ISK could toss the gauntlet at whomever they'd like to. FUN FUN FUN FUN FUN! We can pickle that.
843-BANE BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder. 578	Posted - 2014.01.26 16:02:00 - [238] - Quote RemingtonBeaver wrote: Wow , I didn't know this was a thing. Thanks for the bimpity bump. I agree with Bane here. This needs to be a thing. Smaller corps need to fight. CCP could make it an ISK sink if it'll quantify it. Make the two teams pay in and say the payout is 80% to the winners and 20% goes to the New Eden Parks and Recreation Department. It'd be worth it to the winners and excellent experience to the losers. And anyone willing to put up the ISK could toss the gauntlet at whomever they'd like to. FUN FUN FUN FUN FUN! Yeah that is the key word of the day for this thread: Fun. Corp battles were fun CCP. PCs can be fun, but very rarely. It's usually just lag/spam. BRING BACK CORP BATTLES SIGN THE PEITION HERE
Patrick57 Fatal Absolution Covert Intervention 4269	Posted - 2014.01.26 16:21:00 - [239] - Quote Why is there no blue tag yet?!?! Sad panda is sad Winner of at least 11 King ThunderBolt hate videos :D
Gelhad Thremyr Quebec United The CORVOS 16	Posted - 2014.01.26 16:27:00 - [240] - Quote Bump



Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online/DUST514, the EVE/DUST514 logo, EVE/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to OMG Labs to use EVE Online/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, OMG Labs. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.