| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 |
121. Sticky:[Feedback] EWAR Concentric Circle Scan Falloff Design - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Zatara Rought wrote: as for the fitting cost of a scanner...it's 1/8 the map around you.....45 of 360 degrees. And 14 PG is 1/8 of your total fitting on the highest PG logi's. So much for the other 2-3 equip slots light weapon, nade, and 8 hi...
- by Zaria Min Deir - at 2014.12.01 19:24:00
|
122. Sticky:[Feedback] EWAR Concentric Circle Scan Falloff Design - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
CCP Rattati wrote: Amps decrease Precision Precision reduces range Both increase Profile Do damps decrease precision and range too?
- by Zaria Min Deir - at 2014.12.01 16:55:00
|
123. Sticky:[Feedback] EWAR Concentric Circle Scan Falloff Design - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Jebus McKing wrote: How about we give precision mods a penalty to range instead? This way you'd have to choose between good scans or good range without having to screw around with CAL/AM scout bonuses or having to make range amps high slot modu...
- by Zaria Min Deir - at 2014.12.01 16:50:00
|
124. Sticky:[Feedback] EWAR Concentric Circle Scan Falloff Design - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Ghost Kaisar wrote: No scout should be forced to run all of their lows to avoid scans. It's the point of the damn suit to be hidden, yet I can only BARELY do so when running the most sneaky suit possible. That isn't balance. So, a scou...
- by Zaria Min Deir - at 2014.12.01 15:42:00
|
125. eWar is the most unbalanced thing in this game - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Her Chosen wrote: ImIvan wrote: Apocalyptic Destroyer wrote: He's right, Nothing can get under a Gal's Damp. That's the way it's meant to be? I don't think it's OP, you sacrifice so much for it, I think it's logical that it's easier to...
- by Zaria Min Deir - at 2014.11.27 09:50:00
|
126. Sticky:[Feedback] EWAR Concentric Circle Scan Falloff Design - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
iWanderer wrote: Zaria Min Deir wrote: ...So, how does this help medium frame participation in EWAR? Well, I personally don't think medium frames can or should compete with scouts in stealth... Assaults can choose to dampen to try and hide...
- by Zaria Min Deir - at 2014.11.22 11:54:00
|
127. Sticky:[Feedback] EWAR Concentric Circle Scan Falloff Design - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
el OPERATOR wrote: Umm...you're an idiot? XD Thank you
- by Zaria Min Deir - at 2014.11.22 02:53:00
|
128. Sticky:[Feedback] EWAR Concentric Circle Scan Falloff Design - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Ok, in the last few days I have talked and thought about various ways we could try and make the EWAR system work. It really is hard to find a balance between scouts dedicating their fits to being properly stealthy getting rewarded for doing so and...
- by Zaria Min Deir - at 2014.11.22 01:26:00
|
129. [Feedback] Logi progression is awful - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Logistics slot progression is something I really can't forgive Rattati for dropping the ball on, he was already working on it to coincide with the assault slot layout retooling, and then just tossed it aside without another look when he got negati...
- by Zaria Min Deir - at 2014.11.20 18:20:00
|
130. CPM input request: Logistics & Support. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Cross Atu wrote: Cat Merc wrote: So with this idea in place, could you please increase STD and ADV logistics to their full PRO equipment count? There would still be a reason to skill up to PRO, but STD and ADV logis wouldn't be so limited i...
- by Zaria Min Deir - at 2014.11.18 19:03:00
|
131. equipment spam and my solution. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Iron Wolf Saber wrote: This doesn't solution doesn't even begin to solve tourist logis (logis that throw crap down then swap to something else like a heavy) or as mentioned above other classes from role stomping on logis. Now, my issue with ...
- by Zaria Min Deir - at 2014.11.18 18:40:00
|
132. Sticky:[Feedback] EWAR Concentric Circle Scan Falloff Design - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Ghost Kaisar wrote: \o/ We've been asking for this for awhile. This should mean that high precision high range scouts wont completely dominate the meta, and that assaults won't be blindsided by undamped scouts if they have a precision mod on ...
- by Zaria Min Deir - at 2014.11.17 15:25:00
|
133. Sticky:[Feedback] EWAR Concentric Circle Scan Falloff Design - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
I-Shayz-I wrote: I love this game, and I have been running complex dampeners on my logi/assault...heck even my sentinel sometimes even if it is a waste of a module when you do the math. I want this idea to work, but the current system is so co...
- by Zaria Min Deir - at 2014.11.17 15:10:00
|
134. Sticky:[Feedback] EWAR Concentric Circle Scan Falloff Design - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
CCP Rattati wrote: It can be quite frustrating to try and start a dialogue about the changes, and the majority of replies is: "wtf, so this is going to happen, that's terrible because I heard these numbers were, like, set in stone" "I have gr...
- by Zaria Min Deir - at 2014.11.17 14:42:00
|
135. Sticky:[Feedback] EWAR Concentric Circle Scan Falloff Design - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
WeapondigitX V7 wrote: Please make scouts be unscannable if they are beyond 45m ranges with 2 complex damps. (for enemies with ewar dedicated fittings) With 3 complex damps please make scouts unscannable within 15 meters of the enemy (if enemy...
- by Zaria Min Deir - at 2014.11.17 13:06:00
|
136. CPM input request: Logistics & Support. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Baal Omniscient wrote: Repair tools, like everything else in the game has done so far, needs an anti-point farming mechanic built in. We nerfed nano hives and uplinks because they were too easy to just continuously farm points with, despite th...
- by Zaria Min Deir - at 2014.11.16 10:22:00
|
137. CPM input request: Logistics & Support. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
el OPERATOR wrote: Meee One wrote: Meee One wrote: ... ... I still like this idea. I still hate this idea. Sorry dude. ^Seconded. Though not sorry about it.
- by Zaria Min Deir - at 2014.11.14 18:16:00
|
138. CPM input request: Logistics & Support. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Orion Sanjeet wrote: Y'all better stop trying to turn this into a "how shall we best nerf the logi" thread, otherwise, it just might happen. I think we all know it's coming either way. Hey, when it comes to CCP, might as as well expect the wo...
- by Zaria Min Deir - at 2014.11.14 17:28:00
|
139. CPM input request: Logistics & Support. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Meee One wrote: ResistanceGTA wrote: You know, a lot of information, can't process as I'm at 2 hours of sleep in the past 40 hours, but I would like to pop in this conversation at some point. But what's with this 'removing undocumented CPU ...
- by Zaria Min Deir - at 2014.11.11 07:28:00
|
140. [Request] ISK Payout changes - Current payouts cause risk aversion - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Pretty much stating the obvious there, but it's the kind of obvious that CCP has seen fit to ignore for too long. +1
- by Zaria Min Deir - at 2014.11.08 17:56:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |