| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 |
1221. Nobody wants it in the wrong slot. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Rynoceros wrote: REs and Proxies should be moved to the Grenade slot. Another nerf to AV, great. NO Reppers, Rechargers, Energizers should be opposite of their counterpart. No, regulators should be the same as their counterpart Should the...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2014.04.23 00:37:00
|
1222. I just got enhanced shield energizers... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Louis Domi wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: DozersMouse XIII wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: No as it stands a proto plate is worth 2 proto extenders, which is just plain wrong. Instead Imwould suggest 3:2 ratio. Such that 3 extenders will match 2 ...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2014.04.23 00:33:00
|
1223. Sniper rifles need buff... - in General Discussions [original thread]
keno trader wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: "1) You're probably winning already . . . " this is not excuse for your opponent to snipe from the redline. 2 and 3 apply the majority of the time you get sniped not just from the redline, which is basic...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2014.04.23 00:24:00
|
1224. Pilot Suits - in General Discussions [original thread]
EternalRMG wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: I wouldn't say ADV/PRO as restriction. Instead if the cockpit is closed it requires the use of a pilot suit. Then provide a mlt version (the only suit specialisation to do so) With no bonuses with the mlt...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2014.04.22 23:31:00
|
1225. Question to the AV community about triple rep Madrugars - in General Discussions [original thread]
Benjamin Ciscko wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: Atiim wrote: MarasdF Loron wrote: That is the only fit you can make if you are not allowed to stack anything. I was crying tears of sadness the moment CCP announced 1.7 vehicle changes, so hard...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2014.04.22 23:25:00
|
1226. I just got enhanced shield energizers... - in General Discussions [original thread]
DozersMouse XIII wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: Tectonic Fusion wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: It would be better to ask for a general buff to Shields, heavies are likely to loose 190 EHP at the current rate, this will however effect shield heavie...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2014.04.22 23:19:00
|
1227. I just got enhanced shield energizers... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Tectonic Fusion wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: It would be better to ask for a general buff to Shields, heavies are likely to loose 190 EHP at the current rate, this will however effect shield heavies the most. Yeah. I don't think a basic armor ...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2014.04.22 22:59:00
|
1228. Pilot Suits - in General Discussions [original thread]
I wouldn't say ADV/PRO as restriction. Instead if the cockpit is closed it requires the use of a pilot suit. Then provide a mlt version (the only suit specialisation to do so) With no bonuses with the mlt variant. Class Bonus: -2% Active Module ...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2014.04.22 22:52:00
|
1229. Question to the AV community about triple rep Madrugars - in General Discussions [original thread]
Shinobi MumyoSakanagare ZaShigurui wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: Ahem, whats that sentinel running? 5 armour plates, 5 armour plates, 5 armour plates What do you expect tankers like heavies are more concerned about themselves than helping their...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2014.04.22 22:34:00
|
1230. Question to the AV community about triple rep Madrugars - in General Discussions [original thread]
Atiim wrote: MarasdF Loron wrote: That is the only fit you can make if you are not allowed to stack anything. I was crying tears of sadness the moment CCP announced 1.7 vehicle changes, so hard actually that I had to quit for a while. I sti...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2014.04.22 22:31:00
|
1231. Question to the AV community about triple rep Madrugars - in General Discussions [original thread]
MarasdF Loron wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: MarasdF Loron wrote: DUST Fiend wrote: Passive reps need a nerf in general, either through straight efficiency or through a hefty stacking penalty. Then give us back activated reps. Activated reps...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2014.04.22 22:27:00
|
1232. I want an equipment... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Webifiers that bog down tanks to 0.5% of their maximum speed. Stays until destroyed by infantry.
- by Monkey MAC - at 2014.04.22 17:23:00
|
1233. Recieved some hate mail yesterday.. - in General Discussions [original thread]
If you were 1) Facing off against tonnes of blaster tanks 2) Actually had light turrets 3) Actually had people im these turrets 4) using a tank like a tank and not a 1 man KDR padding machine Well then it's those who sent you the hate mail who w...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2014.04.22 17:20:00
|
1234. Question to the AV community about triple rep Madrugars - in General Discussions [original thread]
MarasdF Loron wrote: DUST Fiend wrote: Passive reps need a nerf in general, either through straight efficiency or through a hefty stacking penalty. Then give us back activated reps. Activated reps at least take a tiny degree of thought and s...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2014.04.22 16:14:00
|
1235. Question to the AV community about triple rep Madrugars - in General Discussions [original thread]
Harpyja wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: How about 1x Plate 1x Repper 1x Hardner On an armour tank that's enough EHP to survive a whole magazine volley of swarms passively, a hardner will allow you to sponge 2 before requiring a retreat and the r...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2014.04.22 14:50:00
|
1236. Question to the AV community about triple rep Madrugars - in General Discussions [original thread]
How about 1x Plate 1x Repper 1x Hardner On an armour tank that's enough EHP to survive a whole magazine volley of swarms passively, a hardner will allow you to sponge 2 before requiring a retreat and the repers mean you don't need to recall it ...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2014.04.22 14:23:00
|
1237. My thoughts on swarms. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Nothing Certain wrote: True Adamance wrote: Mojo XXXIII wrote: Alena Ventrallis wrote: Atiim wrote: Would you happen to have a quote from a DEV stating this? I'm pretty sure there isn't one. Swarms should be good at AV, but they ...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2014.04.22 14:02:00
|
1238. My thoughts on swarms. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Personally when it comes to AV the main problem is the tiers, swarm launchers have the highest gain per tier, while tanks have the lowest gain per tier as such a std swarm can't take on a std tank anymore than it could a proto mod tank. I like yo...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2014.04.22 13:49:00
|
1239. dust has too much customisation. - in General Discussions [original thread]
ADAM-OF-EVE wrote: it occurs to me that dust now has way too much customisation where its far easier to just change your fittings to fill a role than it is to actually use a suit designed for that role. now my math may be a little out because ...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2014.04.22 11:39:00
|
1240. Cyrius Li Moody Ion Pistol review - in General Discussions [original thread]
Dexter307 wrote: The ion pistol should have the highest dps of the pistols For single shots either remove the firecap or increase the damage to 65 at standard For the charged shot either remove overheating or increase damage to 500 Remove th...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2014.04.22 11:20:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |