| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 |
2781. Purposed Active Scanner Adjustments - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ok, well I don't agree with the drawback personally, it completely undoes the scanners main positive. Instead I propose that instead you only get tag data while the scanner is equipped. This stops it being by KDR chasers and makes more squad base...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2013.12.25 13:45:00
|
2782. Jihad jeeps or LAVbombs - in General Discussions [original thread]
Cpl Foster USMC wrote: I prefer "Jihad Jeep" myself... tried it once but it didn't blow on impact..?...instead the tank felt me slam into his backside and backed up, got stuck on top of my LAV, so I jumped out and hit my RE's and blew him to h...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2013.12.25 13:28:00
|
2783. I really am baffled by blue dots sometimes - in General Discussions [original thread]
I was in a match once and one of our points was getting hacked, I get there just in time to see a blueberry waiting behind the red. As soon as the red finished the blue began counter hacking, only to meet the business end of red's shotgun.
- by Monkey MAC - at 2013.12.24 23:39:00
|
2784. Dedicated AV - in General Discussions [original thread]
DJINN Nukem wrote: I got a guy in my corp that hunts tanks with LVL 1 PLASMA CANNON. yeah no bull ****, I watched him take out 2 SOMAS with a lvl 1 PLASMA CANNON ith no help. Ahem, Picks or it didn't happen.
- by Monkey MAC - at 2013.12.24 23:31:00
|
2785. the redline - in General Discussions [original thread]
I think in Public Matches, killing someone from the redline should result in CONCORD tactical Nuking your arse. In Factional Warfare, killing someone from the redline should be tracked as friendly fire. In Planetary Conquest, remove ghe redline EN...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2013.12.24 11:15:00
|
2786. Killing your self 30+ times in FW is ok by CCP - in General Discussions [original thread]
'Awoxing' - Deal with it.
- by Monkey MAC - at 2013.12.24 11:06:00
|
2787. Thoughts on a disruptor grenade - in General Discussions [original thread]
While its cool idea, its throughly impractical, your suggested values wouldn't be enough, but to make them effective would make them op. In terms of Vehicle hampering grenades we could have: Dilation Grenades - Slows down tanks, turrets speed, pr...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2013.12.24 00:46:00
|
2788. Not saying the HMG is OP but... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Simple way of fixing this, add animations for getting in out vehicles, you cant use that tactic if you get shot in the arse while you get out.
- by Monkey MAC - at 2013.12.24 00:38:00
|
2789. newberries allowed to play fw yay or nay - in General Discussions [original thread]
Mortedeamor wrote: I PROPOSE that there be multiple ways of unlocking fw...5 mill sp 100,000 wp or 2000 kills now i draw these numbers for wp and kills from this..a good logi always makes 1000wp per match..so 100 matches bam u can play fw..les...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2013.12.24 00:35:00
|
2790. newberries allowed to play fw yay or nay - in General Discussions [original thread]
KING CHECKMATE wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: KING CHECKMATE wrote: Mortedeamor wrote: KING CHECKMATE wrote: NO. Newberries should stick to Public matches. +1 i love how all the veterans agree that new players should not be allow...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2013.12.24 00:16:00
|
2791. newberries allowed to play fw yay or nay - in General Discussions [original thread]
KING CHECKMATE wrote: Mortedeamor wrote: KING CHECKMATE wrote: NO. Newberries should stick to Public matches. +1 i love how all the veterans agree that new players should not be allowed in fw but all the new players try and argu...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2013.12.23 23:48:00
|
2792. newberries allowed to play fw yay or nay - in General Discussions [original thread]
Depends on what you class as a newberry. I personally think we need to obtain security clearances, a little like EVE. You should have to obtain an average performance rating before you get the next clearance. Each one will probably be the same w...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2013.12.23 22:41:00
|
2793. Stop blowing up your own **** morons - in General Discussions [original thread]
The thing is, these installations are weak, easy to hit and harder to capture. Until we get installations that we can deploy oursleves the will be worth nothing more than few extra warpoints. Better 100 WP for you then 100 for them.
- by Monkey MAC - at 2013.12.23 22:14:00
|
2794. There is no "Dust Community" - in General Discussions [original thread]
There are people who no matter what you say will be hostile, others who will turn hostile when they loose, other like you say start non hostile. I personally try tomstay non hostile as much as possible, but at the same time my hostility towards a...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2013.12.23 12:59:00
|
2795. In-game Dev channel: DevHangout - in General Discussions [original thread]
Heh heh heh, nice. You do realise your just gonna end up being bombarded with enane questions about development, don't you?
- by Monkey MAC - at 2013.12.23 12:45:00
|
2796. A 70k ISK tank should be as effective as a 70k ISK suit - in General Discussions [original thread]
True Adamance wrote: Jadek Menaheim wrote: On principal alone, it makes sense to me that a body costs the same or relatively more than a vehicle to produce. Really seems to me the body would be cheaper to make than a compact internal veh...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2013.12.23 11:03:00
|
2797. A 70k ISK tank should be as effective as a 70k ISK suit - in General Discussions [original thread]
Mordecai Sanguine wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: Guildo Crow wrote: how about a 70k ISK tank should be as effective as a 70k ISK tank? A tank and a dropsuit are not the same thing. You want to kill that tank... bring a tank. AV is supplementa...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2013.12.23 01:26:00
|
2798. A 70k ISK tank should be as effective as a 70k ISK suit - in General Discussions [original thread]
Mordecai Sanguine wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: Mordecai Sanguine wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: Mordecai Sanguine wrote: No. That's a Tank that's different. Tank is supposed to be more effective than 5 Players don't care about their ISK pric...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2013.12.23 01:22:00
|
2799. A 70k ISK tank should be as effective as a 70k ISK suit - in General Discussions [original thread]
Guildo Crow wrote: how about a 70k ISK tank should be as effective as a 70k ISK tank? A tank and a dropsuit are not the same thing. You want to kill that tank... bring a tank. AV is supplementary. When it comes down to the basics, only a vehi...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2013.12.23 01:14:00
|
2800. A 70k ISK tank should be as effective as a 70k ISK suit - in General Discussions [original thread]
Mordecai Sanguine wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: Mordecai Sanguine wrote: Cat Merc wrote: A 70k ISK tank should be as effective as a 70k ISK suit. That is all. No. That's a Tank that's different. Tank is supposed to be more effective tha...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2013.12.23 01:04:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |