| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 |
2721. Dear Soma/Sica scrubs - in General Discussions [original thread]
How is there nothing wrong with 'REAL' tanks? The only way 'REAL' tanks could be balanced by comparison to there WEAKER counterparts is if you consider tank spam a problem. Which poses a lot of questions. What's wrong with plenty of tanks? It'...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2013.12.31 15:58:00
|
2722. Active scanners - in General Discussions [original thread]
hgghyujh wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: If you are complaining about the duvolle focused, please stop. It's a scout catcher, it is designed to catch scouts. Instead discuss the actual problems with scanners, the unparalleled data given at incredib...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2013.12.31 01:18:00
|
2723. Let's fix Recall vehicle feature - in General Discussions [original thread]
1) You cannot have more than 1 vehicle active on the battlefield per person at a time, so you cannot call in a new tank while one you own is already on the field. 2) Recall is canceled if your vehicle recieves more than 10% damage, stops recall d...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2013.12.31 01:07:00
|
2724. Active scanners - in General Discussions [original thread]
Aizen Intiki wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: If you are complaining about the duvolle focused, please stop. It's a scout catcher, it is designed to catch scouts. Instead discuss the actual problems with scanners, the unparalleled data given at incr...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2013.12.31 00:43:00
|
2725. a quetion for the new AV - in General Discussions [original thread]
Void Echo wrote: are you guys just shooting at tanks when their hardeners are up? if you are thats your problem, your too stupid to learn how to do new things. but seriously, this is what I have in mind for making the balance more perfect. s...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2013.12.31 00:16:00
|
2726. Active scanners - in General Discussions [original thread]
If you are complaining about the duvolle focused, please stop. It's a scout catcher, it is designed to catch scouts. Instead discuss the actual problems with scanners, the unparalleled data given at incredibly long ranges for ridiculous amounts of...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2013.12.30 23:48:00
|
2727. AV according to half of the redberries - in General Discussions [original thread]
Diversionary tactic mostly! Ooh look free kills SshBoom, SshBoom Kaboom Bollocks Enemy tank roles through the wreckage.
- by Monkey MAC - at 2013.12.30 22:10:00
|
2728. why tanks are cheap. - in General Discussions [original thread]
N1ck Comeau wrote: if tanks are cheap people will spam them. increase cost to basically limit tankers to 1 a game or they lose some serious isk. or buff AV. Question to pose, whats wrong with 'tank spam'? What's wrong with people using more...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2013.12.30 21:57:00
|
2729. If Heavies had an Equipment Slot - in General Discussions [original thread]
Master Jaraiya wrote: I could set nice vehicle traps by placing REs, Proxies or the soon to be added Webifiers in the retreat path of enemy vehicles, then Pop them with my FG to get them to run into my trap. I could defend points easier by usi...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2013.12.30 21:47:00
|
2730. lolmines - in General Discussions [original thread]
Repe Susi wrote: Darken-Sol wrote: Jason Pearson wrote: Learn to use them you bads, I'm demoing tanks right now with proxies. All BPO fit costs 22k and let's me destroy tanks with ease, especially the ones that like to chase me while I'm...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2013.12.30 10:35:00
|
2731. anyone who hasnt started to put AV nades on all their suits cant complain - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ghosts Chance wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: Ghosts Chance wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: So you are saying you are happy with this scenario. To counter threat A we have counter B - Brilliant Threat A has been buffed, counter B has been nerfed ...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2013.12.30 02:59:00
|
2732. anyone who hasnt started to put AV nades on all their suits cant complain - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ghosts Chance wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: So you are saying you are happy with this scenario. To counter threat A we have counter B - Brilliant Threat A has been buffed, counter B has been nerfed - Ok is there a counter C? No there is only c...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2013.12.30 02:50:00
|
2733. anyone who hasnt started to put AV nades on all their suits cant complain - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ghosts Chance wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: Ghosts Chance wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: Thats the entirety of your response? I had been gearing up for an interseting intellectual battle and that is all you can reply with? Alot of people are usi...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2013.12.30 02:24:00
|
2734. anyone who hasnt started to put AV nades on all their suits cant complain - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ghosts Chance wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: Thats the entirety of your response? I had been gearing up for an interseting intellectual battle and that is all you can reply with? Alot of people are using that argument lately. Im right your wron...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2013.12.30 01:57:00
|
2735. Tanks - Help me understand them! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Point 1. Yes I agree, the vantage point can be advantageous. But how does a tanker know where he can fit if he can't see his tank. However there is a zoomed in or turret view by pressing R3 if you prefer. Point 2) Its rather hard to balance munit...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2013.12.30 01:41:00
|
2736. AV had changed - in General Discussions [original thread]
Now thats fine and Im happy it works. But something for you to consider, why do you think the mobile version (LAV bomb) is more popular?
- by Monkey MAC - at 2013.12.30 01:35:00
|
2737. The Brooklyn Project. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Like the name. What is this in aid of? Bet it still won't blow up a hardened tank!
- by Monkey MAC - at 2013.12.30 01:30:00
|
2738. anyone who hasnt started to put AV nades on all their suits cant complain - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ghosts Chance wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: Ghosts Chance wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: Ghosts Chance wrote: seriously guys when murder taxis were all the rage everyone and their uncle used those things, nobody used any other granade. you m...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2013.12.30 01:26:00
|
2739. anyone who hasnt started to put AV nades on all their suits cant complain - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ghosts Chance wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: Ghosts Chance wrote: seriously guys when murder taxis were all the rage everyone and their uncle used those things, nobody used any other granade. you may say "but AV nades are useless!" and alone ...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2013.12.30 01:19:00
|
2740. anyone who hasnt started to put AV nades on all their suits cant complain - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ghosts Chance wrote: seriously guys when murder taxis were all the rage everyone and their uncle used those things, nobody used any other granade. you may say "but AV nades are useless!" and alone you may be kinda sorta getting close to the t...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2013.12.30 00:55:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |