| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 |
1821. E-E-EPIC DUST KILLS HISTORYY!!! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Dimitri Rascolovitch wrote: OI Rattati we need this back, i want to pancake noobs in my sentinel suit I as well think this is still in game. There are some good things about the unreal engine!
- by KEROSIINI-TERO - at 2014.09.22 11:37:00
|
1822. what will you do with SP from clone challenge? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Let it stack up in unallocated.
- by KEROSIINI-TERO - at 2014.09.22 11:33:00
|
1823. MCC Complete Stretch reached - in General Discussions [original thread]
Dang. I was hoping we would NOT reach it.
- by KEROSIINI-TERO - at 2014.09.22 11:32:00
|
1824. What if we got rid of the red chevron? - in General Discussions [original thread]
I am inclined to like this like this possible direction of EWAR design. Getting rid of red chevrons would minimise 'wallhack' and would also open the door for new stronger ewar effects - without being too strong by itself.
- by KEROSIINI-TERO - at 2014.09.21 23:46:00
|
1825. E-E-EPIC DUST KILLS HISTORYY!!! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Time to give homage to the Most Awesome Dust kill of History! http://youtu.be/q3Ftii629bk?t=1m4s Super Mario style!
- by KEROSIINI-TERO - at 2014.09.21 23:35:00
|
1826. Poland is new World Champion in Volleyball!! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Locker room over there --> https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=topics&f=900
- by KEROSIINI-TERO - at 2014.09.21 23:02:00
|
1827. Are RE's OP? - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Confiming that the only problem is still the too short activation delay. The slight increase in some previous fix was far too little.
- by KEROSIINI-TERO - at 2014.09.21 13:27:00
|
1828. Buff the Breach Shotgun - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Nah while it's useless there's no need to work it.
- by KEROSIINI-TERO - at 2014.09.19 00:33:00
|
1829. Matchmaking not working to well? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Newbs With Bewbs wrote: Because the player base is too small they were the only players searching for battle at that time. Player base is too small for any kind of match making unless you're willing to wait for games (I'm not) Lets do abit...
- by KEROSIINI-TERO - at 2014.09.18 23:36:00
|
1830. Buff the Breach Shotgun - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Agreed. The breach SG has always been subpar to other shotties. The only 'benefit' is questionable as well.
- by KEROSIINI-TERO - at 2014.09.18 21:39:00
|
1831. [FEEDBACK]: Mu and afk farming - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Even though I am the one who brought up thye subject, I do now realise that Mu has some self correcting abilities. Meaning, if you constantly play those 'easier' games then your kdr is likely to get up. Some self correcting abilities. Not full...
- by KEROSIINI-TERO - at 2014.09.18 12:12:00
|
1832. [FEEDBACK]: Mu and afk farming - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Ryme Intrinseca wrote: CCP Rattati wrote: couldn't agree more So what to do about it? Let's say me and Kero are equally good players. But I never AFK and he AFKs, say, half his games. His Mu will be radically lower than mine, so he'll get...
- by KEROSIINI-TERO - at 2014.09.17 20:34:00
|
1833. BONUS SP - in General Discussions [original thread]
james selim brownstein wrote: When is CCP going to get their act together and give us more bonus sp per week. 180,000 sp per week is not enough for people who play dust 24/7.FIX IT CCP!!! That is just the correct amount - because of existen...
- by KEROSIINI-TERO - at 2014.09.17 19:45:00
|
1834. [FEEDBACK]: Mu and afk farming - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Hmm. There's a lot of false assumptions on how afk farmers get their benefits and what are their motivations. But this thread is about how afk farming affects the matchmaking.
- by KEROSIINI-TERO - at 2014.09.17 19:43:00
|
1835. Alright tankers lets get serious. What do we want? [Feedback] AV gtf... - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
No - new tank tiers (marauders of old) meaning by all counts better models as they would create obsolete hulls no one would use out their sp training time. Yes - to new tank variations in the future. Not yet, though, no need to rush.
- by KEROSIINI-TERO - at 2014.09.17 10:58:00
|
1836. Alright tankers lets get serious. What do we want? [Feedback] AV gtf... - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
True, no need for new large turrets. Small tweaks still to current ones please.
- by KEROSIINI-TERO - at 2014.09.17 10:56:00
|
1837. Alright tankers lets get serious. What do we want? [Feedback] AV gtf... - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Jihads in. They are really a no issue and add flavor to game and - most importantly - are nowhere near OP.
- by KEROSIINI-TERO - at 2014.09.17 10:55:00
|
1838. Fluxes and RE's - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Agreed. It would make fluxes more interesting to use, they are a little bit too limited IMO. Besides, it would even make sense.
- by KEROSIINI-TERO - at 2014.09.17 10:52:00
|
1839. Rattati, Small Blasters as Main Turret for HAVs? - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
On a more serios note, a tank with single small turret might not be too OP vs infantry. That could be the real infantry support vehicle in current meta.
- by KEROSIINI-TERO - at 2014.09.17 10:50:00
|
1840. Rattati, Small Blasters as Main Turret for HAVs? - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
I would say BIG YES for "small turret as main turret" -tanks Only if it wouldn't mess up the PG/CPU balance of tanks. A tank with only a small turret would have full complex rack in highs and lows. ...Oh wait, shield tanks can already have almo...
- by KEROSIINI-TERO - at 2014.09.17 10:49:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |