| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
1441. [Suggestion] Add wallet balance to Matchmaking - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
If ISK is to be taken account into matchmaking, it should be based on ISK-efficiency. I had about 150 million refunded with 1.7 and I've been going slightly negative. Basing it solely off of your assets and liquid ISK will only lead to further imb...
- by Harpyja - at 2014.02.23 18:27:00
|
1442. Assault LAV... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Spademan wrote: I could get behind the idea. Stupid name though. Assault Light Assault Vehicle? Nah. Assault Light Armored Vehicle then? As Lorhak suggested in some other post And why does assault have to be a prefix? Can't it be Light Armor...
- by Harpyja - at 2014.02.23 18:21:00
|
1443. Tankers can do it - in General Discussions [original thread]
Lorhak Gannarsein wrote: You can have a LAV with a pilot-controlled gun if my Amarr HAV hovers. Because future, that's why. Because f*** gravity But I'm personally against having "anti-gravity" hover systems in Dust; doesn't fit in New Ed...
- by Harpyja - at 2014.02.23 15:29:00
|
1444. Playing without scanners? - in General Discussions [original thread]
INFINITE DIVERSITY IDIC wrote: Rei Shepard wrote: Qwak Qwak wrote: So apparently there are people who don't use scanners? My main skilled into scanner early and uses them all the time, they are very helpful and i believe them to be someth...
- by Harpyja - at 2014.02.23 15:20:00
|
1445. Playing without scanners? - in General Discussions [original thread]
In my humble opinion, I think scanners shouldn't exist in the first place (at least handheld scanners). At the least anyone using a scanner should light up to the enemy for an equivalent duration of time, reduced only by that player's suit dB. ...
- by Harpyja - at 2014.02.23 03:45:00
|
1446. [Idea] Possible Tracking Disruption Implementation - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
+1 As far as delivery, I think it should be like the repair tool on infantry. For vehicle based tracking disruptors, they should be like the remote reps before 1.7: requires lock-on but remains active for a some duration and allows the vehicle t...
- by Harpyja - at 2014.02.22 15:16:00
|
1447. Lets put Swarms on Lavs - in General Discussions [original thread]
Do it CCP
- by Harpyja - at 2014.02.21 14:36:00
|
1448. If we removed all vehicles from ambush.... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Patrick57 wrote: Quote: If we removed all vehicles from ambush.... The tankers would only cry more for an all vehicle mode. Naw, I'll cry for the removal of AV in Skirmish! No wait, I want to see more infantry AV trying to take me out th...
- by Harpyja - at 2014.02.21 02:25:00
|
1449. Tanks - More tank talk - in General Discussions [original thread]
Kaughst wrote: Tanks are going to get some kind of nerf. Even in the least a movement speed or turn speed reduction. You look at the Flaylock and you compare the two situations where you hear a large mass of people upset. If by nerf, you mean...
- by Harpyja - at 2014.02.20 19:03:00
|
1450. Tinfoil Hat Conspiracy: ALL Pilots are FoTM Scrubs - in General Discussions [original thread]
Darken-Soul wrote: Harpyja wrote: Atiim wrote: *Dons Tinfoil Hat* The term "FoTM Scrub" refers to people who SP // XP into an item that grants an unbalanced advantage over people who don't use the same gear. The term "FoTM" (Flavor of...
- by Harpyja - at 2014.02.20 18:47:00
|
1451. Tinfoil Hat Conspiracy: ALL Pilots are FoTM Scrubs - in General Discussions [original thread]
Flix Keptick wrote: Just stay away from tanks and ambush, if a tank manages to sneak up on you you just suck. I'm surprised at how many ridgeline snipers I snuck up on with my Gunnlogi. I must've been as close as 5m in some cases and spent a ...
- by Harpyja - at 2014.02.20 18:40:00
|
1452. Tinfoil Hat Conspiracy: ALL Pilots are FoTM Scrubs - in General Discussions [original thread]
Atiim wrote: *Dons Tinfoil Hat* The term "FoTM Scrub" refers to people who SP // XP into an item that grants an unbalanced advantage over people who don't use the same gear. The term "FoTM" (Flavor of The Month); refers to gear that is spam...
- by Harpyja - at 2014.02.20 18:34:00
|
1453. Remove WP for destroying yellow installation - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Skihids wrote: Unguarded/abandoned material is best destroyed rather than left to be captured by the enemy and used against your forces. It's an ancient doctrine of warfare. Turrets qualify as abandoned material 99.9% of the time. Hacking WP...
- by Harpyja - at 2014.02.20 14:35:00
|
1454. Vehicle Quota - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Problem with making different vehicle caps is that if some scrubs hit the quota, that leaves me with a 400k SP dropsuit which is considerably worse than my ~13mil SP Gunnlogi. It wouldn't be fair for infantry either if you had limits to certain s...
- by Harpyja - at 2014.02.20 01:05:00
|
1455. Shield tanks passive shield rep - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
So hardened shields are able to recharge while being damaged by anti-armor weapons, but stop recharging when damaged by anti-shield weapons. Where's the problem?
- by Harpyja - at 2014.02.20 00:55:00
|
1456. Forum Peps I've Meet In-Game - in General Discussions [original thread]
PO0KY wrote: I always get all excited whenever I see any of those people. Then it makes me sad when I realize I'm insignificant. Then I lie down and cry a lot Haha yes! I also get excited when I see someone in-game from the forums. And I sup...
- by Harpyja - at 2014.02.19 19:37:00
|
1457. True Av'ers take on AV vs Vehicles Situation - in General Discussions [original thread]
Atiim wrote: Harpyja wrote: Berserker007 wrote: Auris Lionesse wrote: Agreed but I don't see the point in plasma cannon. Just use forge. much faster and more accurate. Unless plasma wants to start at 2500 it'll still be worthless for W...
- by Harpyja - at 2014.02.19 15:27:00
|
1458. True Av'ers take on AV vs Vehicles Situation - in General Discussions [original thread]
Berserker007 wrote: Auris Lionesse wrote: Agreed but I don't see the point in plasma cannon. Just use forge. much faster and more accurate. Unless plasma wants to start at 2500 it'll still be worthless for WTF damage against tanks. PLC i...
- by Harpyja - at 2014.02.19 15:01:00
|
1459. Remove WP for destroying yellow installation - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Liquid Big Boss wrote: Harpyja wrote: This has been discussed already multiple times. A decent tanker will always destroy turret installations because they are liabilities. It can't suck any more than retreating after winning a tank battle w...
- by Harpyja - at 2014.02.19 14:52:00
|
1460. Tankers Please Read - in General Discussions [original thread]
Sounds like a bad tanker to me. Not surprised because the removal of the SP gap has brought an influx of stupid tankers using tanks as "glorified assault suits." My role as a missile Gunnlogi is crystal clear: neutralize enemy vehicles at close p...
- by Harpyja - at 2014.02.19 02:03:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |