| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 |
1341. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV and SHAV Progression - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Everything you just posted is opinion. And bluntly I'm not interested in taking Red star opinions seriously when all you guys do is repeat spkr4thedead's usual not-points. And in what deluded post has anyone in any of the latest HAV threads seri...
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.02.27 16:08:00
|
1342. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV and SHAV Progression - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Takahiro Kashuken wrote: You buff AV then you kill the LAV You buff AV you kill the DS You buff AV you kill the ADS You buff AV you kill the DHAV Any which way you buff AV you kill something else and completely take it off the field and out o...
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.02.27 15:37:00
|
1343. [Suggestion] Adapting SKIN idea for Moods - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
DA RED WUNZ GO FASTA!!!!!
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.02.27 10:56:00
|
1344. More ways to get paid. LP in FW - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Actually I can see an enlist option providing better benefits yhan you would get by simply running FW as a merc Who will fight for anyone.
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.02.27 10:52:00
|
1345. [Suggestion] Pub Match Payout - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
abdullah muzaffar wrote: No. Unless its +25000 for every hundred wp, no matter if you lose/win. Your current proposal does not reward new players. Also, 450k for top is pretty low I believe it should be based on assets lost by you +isk/wp 450...
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.02.27 00:16:00
|
1346. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV and SHAV Progression - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Tebu Gan wrote: Anyways, I always feel like a douche when I get out and gun down that AV. Fun yes, but it's just not right. You know how some people get massively butthurt about the Bolt Pistol? I'm that guy with the bolt pistol. But on ...
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.02.26 23:46:00
|
1347. Incentive to win Dom - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Imp Smash wrote: Breakin Stuff wrote: Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Nothing will change in dom if proto stomping isn't fixed. The fact is we have 80mil SP players going against 10mil SP players and they simply cannot compete, add in a squad a...
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.02.26 23:32:00
|
1348. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV and SHAV Progression - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
I've had some inspiration from a few people. I'm basically designing weapons based on the idea that heavy weapons should be AV/AI capable rather than being locked to one or the other. That way you can actually balance them vs. infantry without st...
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.02.26 23:15:00
|
1349. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV and SHAV Progression - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
True Adamance wrote: Interesting theory. Btw what is your scrambler lance like? I've been thinking of suggestions for the Large and Small Laser Turrets if they ever are to appear and how they might function. Normally I hate the idea of anot...
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.02.26 23:05:00
|
1350. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV and SHAV Progression - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
True Adamance wrote: Breakin Stuff wrote: True Adamance wrote: LudiKure ninda wrote: cal UHAV- 3 resistance to hybrid railgun and hybrid blaster damage per lvl Gal UHAV-3 resistance to projectile damage per lvl So much fail right ...
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.02.26 23:00:00
|
1351. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV and SHAV Progression - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
True Adamance wrote: LudiKure ninda wrote: cal UHAV- 3 resistance to hybrid railgun and hybrid blaster damage per lvl Gal UHAV-3 resistance to projectile damage per lvl So much fail right here. I believe the simplest thing would be t...
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.02.26 22:53:00
|
1352. Sticky:[Feedback] Planetary Conquest Revisited - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
el OPERATOR wrote: Breakin Stuff wrote: el OPERATOR wrote: Point me please to the corp of 20 who has "indefinitely" held 10 districts? NyainSan, iirc, is MH oldest landholder and they've historically been a large group AND have had thei...
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.02.26 22:49:00
|
1353. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV and SHAV Progression - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
LudiKure ninda wrote: and NO av dont need to be buffed, maybe plasma cannon but swarms are overkill on min comando allerady.. FG...well it need some love,breach especialy. I've already said multiple times that swarms need to not be buffed v...
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.02.26 22:46:00
|
1354. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV and SHAV Progression - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
True Adamance wrote: Breakin Stuff wrote: True Adamance wrote: Are UHAV getting defensive module bonuses or something else entirely? If the winds are blowing the way the aught, they'll be getting a direct resistance to Infantry AV. W...
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.02.26 22:40:00
|
1355. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV and SHAV Progression - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Tebu Gan wrote: I wasn't going to ask, but I will ask if you think DHAV need to be soloed by AV? Tanks that aren't even built around killing infantry. Another note, AV may need some minor tweaks upwards, but the biggest change needs to come ...
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.02.26 22:39:00
|
1356. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV and SHAV Progression - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
True Adamance wrote: Are UHAV getting defensive module bonuses or something else entirely? If the winds are blowing the way the aught, they'll be getting a direct resistance to Infantry AV. Which will not apply to heavy turrets. that's re...
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.02.26 22:15:00
|
1357. Sticky:[Feedback] Planetary Conquest Revisited - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
el OPERATOR wrote: Point me please to the corp of 20 who has "indefinitely" held 10 districts? NyainSan, iirc, is MH oldest landholder and they've historically been a large group AND have had their territory counts fluctuate relative to the w...
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.02.26 21:50:00
|
1358. Sticky:[Feedback] Planetary Conquest Revisited - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
el OPERATOR wrote: Passing off yet another pubqueue as "raiding" and a PC "overhaul" is a fantastic scheme, btw. If the PC overhaul is just raiding I might throw up in my mouth a little. It'd be horridly disappointing.
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.02.26 21:46:00
|
1359. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV and SHAV Progression - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Tebu Gan wrote: Breakin Stuff wrote: no passive resists unless by module. Ummm, duh? I'm sorry, when I say passive resists I mean like we had pre 1.6. Sorry I'm a long time tanker and forget to clarify, I simply assume everyone knows what...
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.02.26 21:43:00
|
1360. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV and SHAV Progression - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
no passive resists unless by module.
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.02.26 21:17:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |