Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Harpyja
DUST University Ivy League
82
|
Posted - 2013.06.06 22:23:00 -
[91] - Quote
slap26 wrote:Tankin Tarkus wrote:shield tanks still have the advantage when it comes to getting attacked by AV... the only things that do more damage to shield tanks than armor tanks are flux and orbitals everything else does the same or greater damage to armor Shield tanks have less EHP then armor tanks and therefore AV decimates shields much easier then armor. If you look to EVE, an actively tanked shield ship can often take a lot more punishment in a shorter amount of time than armor can.
I'm fine with giving armor more EHP, but shield should have stronger repping abilities.
It's beyond me why Dust is currently favoring armor tanks. |
Tankin Tarkus
Quafe Runners
29
|
Posted - 2013.06.06 22:27:00 -
[92] - Quote
slap26 wrote:Tankin Tarkus wrote:shield tanks still have the advantage when it comes to getting attacked by AV... the only things that do more damage to shield tanks than armor tanks are flux and orbitals everything else does the same or greater damage to armor Shield tanks have less EHP then armor tanks and therefore AV decimates shields much easier then armor. ya some dude was saying the same thing with his 5.5k shield tank compared to a 5.9k armor madrugar..... the only way for armor to get a significant hp increase over shield is to use a standard large missile and a 15% pg expansion and fit a 180mm plate.... blaster madrugars dont have enough PG to fit a 180mm without giving up all their damage resistance for PG expansions...
ladwar wrote:Tankin Tarkus wrote:shield tanks still have the advantage when it comes to getting attacked by AV... the only things that do more damage to shield tanks than armor tanks are flux and orbitals everything else does the same or greater damage to armor you forgot blasters(turrets) and plasma cannons. both blasters and plasma cannons are hybrid weapons they do the same damage to both shield and armor
|
ladwar
Dead Six Initiative Lokun Listamenn
586
|
Posted - 2013.06.06 22:35:00 -
[93] - Quote
Tankin Tarkus wrote:slap26 wrote:Tankin Tarkus wrote:shield tanks still have the advantage when it comes to getting attacked by AV... the only things that do more damage to shield tanks than armor tanks are flux and orbitals everything else does the same or greater damage to armor Shield tanks have less EHP then armor tanks and therefore AV decimates shields much easier then armor. ya some dude was saying the same thing with his 5.5k shield tank compared to a 5.9k armor madrugar..... the only way for armor to get a significant hp increase over shield is to use a standard large missile and a 15% pg expansion and fit a 180mm plate.... blaster madrugars dont have enough PG to fit a 180mm without giving up all their damage resistance for PG expansions... ladwar wrote:Tankin Tarkus wrote:shield tanks still have the advantage when it comes to getting attacked by AV... the only things that do more damage to shield tanks than armor tanks are flux and orbitals everything else does the same or greater damage to armor you forgot blasters(turrets) and plasma cannons. both blasters and plasma cannons are hybrid weapons they do the same damage to both shield and armor 110% on shields 94% on armor.. that equals the same where you come from? because it doesn't here. and I have seen and done the math, you can get a 180mm plate a blaster and heavy armor repairer with a single PG booster and still have the CPU to fit 2 armor hardeners. |
Tankin Tarkus
Quafe Runners
29
|
Posted - 2013.06.06 22:53:00 -
[94] - Quote
id like to know how u do it because im an armor tanker and i cant lemme guess basic/lowest costing version of everything?
|
Eurydice Itzhak
Militaires Sans Jeux
56
|
Posted - 2013.06.07 19:16:00 -
[95] - Quote
Tankin Tarkus wrote:shield tanks still have the advantage when it comes to getting attacked by AV... the only things that do more damage to shield tanks than armor tanks are flux and orbitals everything else does the same or greater damage to armor
Shield tanks take more damage from: Blasters, Railguns, Flux grenades, and Forge Guns. Armor tanks take more damage from: AV Grenades, Swarms.
If shield tanks weren't useless you'd see more people carrying flux grenades (seeing as they are great for infantry already.)
Also Orbitals doing more to shield tanks is a HUGE thing.
I'm lucky to survive an orbital this build. I've yet to see an armor tank go down to one.
I'd like to reiterate and bump.
Shield has no instance where they out perform armor. Shield has NOTHING it does better vs armor for vehicles. |
ladwar
Dead Six Initiative Lokun Listamenn
588
|
Posted - 2013.06.07 20:17:00 -
[96] - Quote
this is getting annoying. just so it is out there weapos/turrets that do 100% on both is forge guns, railguns, and orbitals (warbarge ones)(thats3 for people counting) ones that are more effective on armor are AV grenades, swarm launchers and missile turrets(that's 3 for people counting) ones that are more effective on shields are flux, plasma cannon and blaster turrets(that's also 3 for people counting) so everyone can see there are 3 for each. this does not count small arms fire because that's an infantry thing to worry about but I can add them if people want to argue over them. |
pegasis prime
The Shadow Cavalry Mercenaries DARKSTAR ARMY
251
|
Posted - 2013.06.07 20:38:00 -
[97] - Quote
ladwar wrote:this is getting annoying. just so it is out there weapos/turrets that do 100% on both is forge guns, railguns, and orbitals (warbarge ones)(thats3 for people counting) ones that are more effective on armor are AV grenades, swarm launchers and missile turrets(that's 3 for people counting) ones that are more effective on shields are flux, plasma cannon and blaster turrets(that's also 3 for people counting) so everyone can see there are 3 for each. this does not count small arms fire because that's an infantry thing to worry about but I can add them if people want to argue over them.
I was testing rail guns today and they do 89% dammage to armour and 109% dammage to shields so really its not that even as 20% more efficient against shields is quite a jump. Test it and see for yourself I didnt know the exact figure myself. Ill be testi g the efficiencys of all av against both shield and armour. Avnades excluded. |
ladwar
Dead Six Initiative Lokun Listamenn
589
|
Posted - 2013.06.07 20:51:00 -
[98] - Quote
pegasis prime wrote:ladwar wrote:this is getting annoying. just so it is out there weapos/turrets that do 100% on both is forge guns, railguns, and orbitals (warbarge ones)(thats3 for people counting) ones that are more effective on armor are AV grenades, swarm launchers and missile turrets(that's 3 for people counting) ones that are more effective on shields are flux, plasma cannon and blaster turrets(that's also 3 for people counting) so everyone can see there are 3 for each. this does not count small arms fire because that's an infantry thing to worry about but I can add them if people want to argue over them. I was testing rail guns today and they do 89% dammage to armour and 109% dammage to shields so really its not that even as 20% more efficient against shields is quite a jump. Test it and see for yourself I didnt know the exact figure myself. Ill be testi g the efficiencys of all av against both shield and armour. Avnades excluded. well I will test this clam but I won't believe it till I see it. |
Eurydice Itzhak
Militaires Sans Jeux
56
|
Posted - 2013.06.07 20:52:00 -
[99] - Quote
ladwar wrote:this is getting annoying. just so it is out there weapos/turrets that do 100% on both is forge guns, railguns, and orbitals (warbarge ones)(thats3 for people counting) ones that are more effective on armor are AV grenades, swarm launchers and missile turrets(that's 3 for people counting) ones that are more effective on shields are flux, plasma cannon and blaster turrets(that's also 3 for people counting) so everyone can see there are 3 for each. this does not count small arms fire because that's an infantry thing to worry about but I can add them if people want to argue over them.
Orbitals might be true but I'm nearly certain forge/rails have a higher efficiency rating when aiming at shields vs armor.
If I'm wrong I'll gladly concede but I'll need to log on and aim at shields/armor on a CRU.
If it is wrong it just that forge/rails/orbitals SEEM to do more damage because shield tanks have no way to heal through it while armor does. |
ladwar
Dead Six Initiative Lokun Listamenn
589
|
Posted - 2013.06.07 21:03:00 -
[100] - Quote
I stand corrected. rails do more to shields then armor, that needs to be fixed. this also effects forge guns. this needs to be fixed ASAP CCP. |
|
Eurydice Itzhak
Militaires Sans Jeux
56
|
Posted - 2013.06.07 21:29:00 -
[101] - Quote
ladwar wrote:I stand corrected. rails do more to shields then armor, that needs to be fixed. this also effects forge guns. this needs to be fixed ASAP CCP.
We'll be lucky if shield tanking gets any love at all. This "bug" has been in since chromosome. I try to keep threads like this bumped because its really ridiculous how behind shield tanking is for vehicles.
I'd say armor tanking for infantry is in a better spot and they get replies to their threads v.v |
pegasis prime
The Shadow Cavalry Mercenaries DARKSTAR ARMY
252
|
Posted - 2013.06.07 21:38:00 -
[102] - Quote
Yep its really not balanced at all. I dont thunk were asking for much really . We just want shield tanking to be a bit more viable. None of us want invulnerability we just want at least a chance against the new god mode madrugers. |
Amanososei
Paragon Fury Tactical Narcotics Team
3
|
Posted - 2013.06.08 02:40:00 -
[103] - Quote
I switched from Armor tanking to Shield tanking with the respec, and now have buyers remorse for the most part. I did this so that I could have more survivability against infantry. I do for the most part unless someone comes out with plasma cannon, forge gun, flux grenades. Then I drop extremely fast.
The resistance against explosives is nice though as most infantry use that. It does really suck though that if I see any armor tank hit the field, I have to try to run and flank them just to have a chance, or I have to put the dam thing away.
If I see a shield tank hit the field though.... I'm not nearly as scared. I can normally destroy a fellow shield tanker no problem.
After a while of trying to tinker with fittings and such to find something more efficient for me, in the end I feel like there really is only 1 way to go in shield tank to have any edge at all, as passive tanking is barely viable, and even active tanking I only get half my shields back, then have to sit around like an idiot behind a rock praying someone doesn't find me.
I agree with the majority of the people that say Armor > Shield tanks, and I normally don't like to choose sides in discussions like this. |
Eurydice Itzhak
Militaires Sans Jeux
57
|
Posted - 2013.06.08 03:34:00 -
[104] - Quote
Amanososei wrote:I switched from Armor tanking to Shield tanking with the respec, and now have buyers remorse for the most part. I did this so that I could have more survivability against infantry. I do for the most part unless someone comes out with plasma cannon, forge gun, flux grenades. Then I drop extremely fast.
The resistance against explosives is nice though as most infantry use that. It does really suck though that if I see any armor tank hit the field, I have to try to run and flank them just to have a chance, or I have to put the dam thing away.
If I see a shield tank hit the field though.... I'm not nearly as scared. I can normally destroy a fellow shield tanker no problem.
After a while of trying to tinker with fittings and such to find something more efficient for me, in the end I feel like there really is only 1 way to go in shield tank to have any edge at all, as passive tanking is barely viable, and even active tanking I only get half my shields back, then have to sit around like an idiot behind a rock praying someone doesn't find me.
I agree with the majority of the people that say Armor > Shield tanks, and I normally don't like to choose sides in discussions like this.
This is from the eyes of an armor to shield convert.
This is what shield tanking feels like. |
Heathen Bastard
Kang Lo Directorate Gallente Federation
319
|
Posted - 2013.06.08 05:47:00 -
[105] - Quote
actually, there is one upside to shield tanking.
those little pricks who run up, plop down a hive and spam every av nade in the entire game at you will blindly follow your tank as you back up and lure them a good 30 meters out while tanking those nades(seemingly they're only standard or something, because they do like nothing) then they realize they need more nades and on reflex run back, then you just pelt them with a couple missiles and lol.
also, tanked a LAV. it seriously just rammed me, full speed, exploded and didn't even do 1000 to my shields. KAMIKAZEEEEEEE-fail. |
ladwar
Dead Six Initiative Lokun Listamenn
595
|
Posted - 2013.06.08 14:16:00 -
[106] - Quote
they nerf crash damage from LAVs to HAVs |
pegasis prime
The Shadow Cavalry Mercenaries DARKSTAR ARMY
260
|
Posted - 2013.06.08 14:56:00 -
[107] - Quote
Also they nerfed the dammage that kamakazi dropships do to my tank . Allways makes me laugh when they get that desperate lol. Back on point maby if they bring out a heavy passive regen module that would increase the passive regen to ~80-90 costing 42 cpu and 200-300 pg for balance. ?? Thoughts and oppinions of shield tankers and av sprcialists welcome. |
ladwar
Dead Six Initiative Lokun Listamenn
595
|
Posted - 2013.06.08 17:24:00 -
[108] - Quote
something.. I surprised that no dev has posted anything, guess they think its balanced then.. |
Eurydice Itzhak
Militaires Sans Jeux
59
|
Posted - 2013.06.08 20:17:00 -
[109] - Quote
ladwar wrote:something.. I surprised that no dev has posted anything, guess they think its balanced then..
There's no way they think its balanced. If it goes around 2 months without anything on the subject I'll probably drop the game. Too deep into Caldari to turn around. |
Amanososei
Paragon Fury Tactical Narcotics Team
5
|
Posted - 2013.06.08 20:30:00 -
[110] - Quote
Eurydice Itzhak wrote:ladwar wrote:something.. I surprised that no dev has posted anything, guess they think its balanced then.. There's no way they think its balanced. If it goes around 2 months without anything on the subject I'll probably drop the game. Too deep into Caldari to turn around.
I actually just went ahead and bought my way back into Gallente tanks. It does suck feeling like I have "wasted" so much SP, but hopefully they will balance some things out later, and I can get some use out of the shield tank. It really does do better against explosives which helps. Might have to just be a bit situational.
Than again, being in armor again last night I kinda realized that it almost doesn't matter so long as I can turn on my repper and get ALL MY FRIGGIN HP BACK. Having played shields all month, and going back to armor is really making me see the HUGE difference.
Unless we get 1 more magical respec, I'll just deal with all the SP in shields. I like driving a caldari death taxi every now and then anyway. :) |
|
Yotta Guns
Molon Labe. League of Infamy
20
|
Posted - 2013.06.08 21:00:00 -
[111] - Quote
Amanososei wrote:Eurydice Itzhak wrote:ladwar wrote:something.. I surprised that no dev has posted anything, guess they think its balanced then.. There's no way they think its balanced. If it goes around 2 months without anything on the subject I'll probably drop the game. Too deep into Caldari to turn around. I actually just went ahead and bought my way back into Gallente tanks. It does suck feeling like I have "wasted" so much SP, but hopefully they will balance some things out later, and I can get some use out of the shield tank. It really does do better against explosives which helps. Might have to just be a bit situational. Than again, being in armor again last night I kinda realized that it almost doesn't matter so long as I can turn on my repper and get ALL MY FRIGGIN HP BACK. Having played shields all month, and going back to armor is really making me see the HUGE difference. Unless we get 1 more magical respec, I'll just deal with all the SP in shields. I like driving a caldari death taxi every now and then anyway. :) It's the reppers on the armor tanks that make them op... They're virtually invincible. I've snuck up on an about tank started hitting it with a scattered neutron blaster, and at just under half armor, turned its repper on and actually gained health back while I was still shooting it... I almost lost that battle too. Its very upsetting to see the difference in power... Ccp,, Nerf the reppers on the armor tank to be more equal to that of the Shields, and introduce a Shield rep tool for infantry and things will be better.. |
Eurydice Itzhak
Militaires Sans Jeux
59
|
Posted - 2013.06.08 21:06:00 -
[112] - Quote
Amanososei wrote:Eurydice Itzhak wrote:ladwar wrote:something.. I surprised that no dev has posted anything, guess they think its balanced then.. There's no way they think its balanced. If it goes around 2 months without anything on the subject I'll probably drop the game. Too deep into Caldari to turn around. I actually just went ahead and bought my way back into Gallente tanks. It does suck feeling like I have "wasted" so much SP, but hopefully they will balance some things out later, and I can get some use out of the shield tank. It really does do better against explosives which helps. Might have to just be a bit situational. Than again, being in armor again last night I kinda realized that it almost doesn't matter so long as I can turn on my repper and get ALL MY FRIGGIN HP BACK. Having played shields all month, and going back to armor is really making me see the HUGE difference. Unless we get 1 more magical respec, I'll just deal with all the SP in shields. I like driving a caldari death taxi every now and then anyway. :)
How deep are you into Caldari?
I dunno if I could just start dumping points into armor and not feel under powered. I suppose I've got proto hybrid which is good and I've got the core skills to 5, just no points into armor skills at all. |
Yotta Guns
Molon Labe. League of Infamy
20
|
Posted - 2013.06.08 21:12:00 -
[113] - Quote
Eurydice Itzhak wrote:Amanososei wrote:Eurydice Itzhak wrote:ladwar wrote:something.. I surprised that no dev has posted anything, guess they think its balanced then.. There's no way they think its balanced. If it goes around 2 months without anything on the subject I'll probably drop the game. Too deep into Caldari to turn around. I actually just went ahead and bought my way back into Gallente tanks. It does suck feeling like I have "wasted" so much SP, but hopefully they will balance some things out later, and I can get some use out of the shield tank. It really does do better against explosives which helps. Might have to just be a bit situational. Than again, being in armor again last night I kinda realized that it almost doesn't matter so long as I can turn on my repper and get ALL MY FRIGGIN HP BACK. Having played shields all month, and going back to armor is really making me see the HUGE difference. Unless we get 1 more magical respec, I'll just deal with all the SP in shields. I like driving a caldari death taxi every now and then anyway. :) How deep are you into Caldari? I dunno if I could just start dumping points into armor and not feel under powered. I suppose I've got proto hybrid which is good and I've got the core skills to 5, just no points into armor skills at all. I'm pretty deep myself .. When the launch came, I didn't think at all that they'd change anything about the balance of tanks cause there didn't seem to be anything wrong with em i'm the last build (as far as balance went anyway. :/ ) |
Eurydice Itzhak
Militaires Sans Jeux
59
|
Posted - 2013.06.08 21:26:00 -
[114] - Quote
Yotta Guns wrote: I'm pretty deep myself .. When the launch came, I didn't think at all that they'd change anything about the balance of tanks cause there didn't seem to be anything wrong with em i'm the last build (as far as balance went anyway. :/ )
I suppose after I finish up my last point into missles I'll start dumping points back into armor.
Sucks that 5M sp in the last build got me a fully fitted Sagaris and a good Madrugar and in this build 7.5m SP doesn't even get back to how good my Sagaris was, with 0 points into armor so far. |
Amanososei
Paragon Fury Tactical Narcotics Team
5
|
Posted - 2013.06.08 22:31:00 -
[115] - Quote
I actually only got enough to just jump into the armor tank. So only have what is needed to get Caldari HAV 1. Where most of my SP are spent that I would like back is in all the shield skills, but I'm sure they'll come in handy sooner or later.
It didn't take me long to get back into an armor tank. Just got back into it last night, but now I have to race in the armor tree to be able to sue much needed armor mods, so I am kind of gimped until then.
I do have the turret skills already though, as well as all the core vehicle skills. So it's not toooooo much of a loss. |
Eurydice Itzhak
Militaires Sans Jeux
60
|
Posted - 2013.06.08 23:31:00 -
[116] - Quote
Thread has devolved into how hard/easy it is to transfer over to armor tanking.
CCP pls.. |
Tactic Angel
GodsWolves
18
|
Posted - 2013.06.09 00:53:00 -
[117] - Quote
I would probably agree with the imbalance being pretty noticeable. I would tend to think that the answer is more adjusting the performance of the armored HAV downward than giving the shield HAV a huge boost. Armor tanks start off better, and I can stand behind one and feed it infinite HP as a logistics player. Granted, I don't get may points for doing this, usually, winning is more important.
Unless they are going to make 'energy transfer links' or something that recharge shields/armor.
|
ladwar
Dead Six Initiative Lokun Listamenn
598
|
Posted - 2013.06.09 06:38:00 -
[118] - Quote
I wonder how long they are going to ignore the issue..kindof like the TAR |
Eurydice Itzhak
Militaires Sans Jeux
60
|
Posted - 2013.06.09 07:38:00 -
[119] - Quote
I've equipped a Falcion with 3 damage mods and a proto railgun.
It's actually pretty nice.
If I had HP to actually compete with it I would be happy. |
pegasis prime
The Shadow Cavalry Mercenaries DARKSTAR ARMY
262
|
Posted - 2013.06.09 10:36:00 -
[120] - Quote
2 dammage mods and a local powergrid expansion should give you enough pg for more shields. |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |