| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 [20] 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 |
381. My Dust world turned upside down... - in General Discussions [original thread]
VAHZZ wrote: I came into DUST at the end of Closed Beta, I have been here a while. And I have yet to see anyone near as good as those legends. AP is one of the reasons why I detest tanks with a burning passion... Where on the doll did the bi...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2015.03.08 02:50:00
|
382. My Dust world turned upside down... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Big Burns wrote: I've been back for about 2 months now. I've seen a lot of new faces. It's like comparing Kobe Bryant to Michael Jordan. When I left Dust last year, FunkMaster Whale was the best Forge-Gunner in the game. Guys like Regnum, Kal...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2015.03.07 18:46:00
|
383. Hotfix Echo - Top 3 Jumpers (with maths!) - in General Discussions [original thread]
John Psi wrote: jumping in the tactical shooter is disgusting nonsense lol this isn't tactical.
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2015.03.07 18:31:00
|
384. Assault HMG viable AV? - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Sad how rifles and machine guns do damage to tanks.
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2015.03.07 16:59:00
|
385. making the madrugar viable??? really? - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Pokey Dravon wrote: No he's serious. "Because I'm better at using a Madrugar than I am a Gunnlogi, clearly it's the superior tank." Because people get a hard on for anecdotal evidence. You have a hard on for the word "anecdotal."
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2015.03.07 16:57:00
|
386. Sticky:[Data Insights] Simple Planetary Conquest Kill Analysis plus Raw... - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Nerfs incoming due to data from PC, where everybody uses their best gear and brings their A-game?
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2015.03.07 15:52:00
|
387. Does 85% seem like a bit much? - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
No, the side sprinting while shooting, literally running a circle around me while all I can do is essentially spin in place to try to keep up, needs to end. You can't move backwards as fast as you can forwards. It's simple human physiology.
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2015.03.07 14:58:00
|
388. HAV operation BEFORE changes happend - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Regular suit operation is 4x, why is it being bumped up to 8x? What will the destroyers and ultras be, 12x? 15x? This is ridiculous.
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2015.03.06 15:40:00
|
389. Sticky:[Feedback] Normalization of AV Damage Profiles - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Breakin Stuff wrote: Ghost Kaisar wrote: Sgt Kirk wrote: CCP Rattati wrote: So you would want to swap to a shield swarm and back to an armor swarm as AV infantry? Example: A corp mate of mine, who is very good and very intellige...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2015.03.05 20:48:00
|
390. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV and SHAV Progression - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
CCP Rattati wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: Alena Ventrallis wrote: CCP Rattati wrote: No PG/CPU upgrade debuff Huh? An upgrade debuff? Hopefully it means they won't cost a ton the other way. They basically nullify each other, making ...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2015.03.05 06:15:00
|
391. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV and SHAV Progression - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Alena Ventrallis wrote: CCP Rattati wrote: No PG/CPU upgrade debuff Huh? An upgrade debuff? Hopefully it means they won't cost a ton the other way. They basically nullify each other, making them both useless: you need PG for something,...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2015.03.05 05:40:00
|
392. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV and SHAV Progression - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
CCP Rattati wrote: No single hardener rule No PG/CPU upgrade debuff (increased fitting costs as previously discussed) stay posted Good news everyone.
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2015.03.05 05:37:00
|
393. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV and SHAV Progression - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Godin Thekiller wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: Tanks were fine during Chrome. Not really, seeing as Rails 3 shotted them. Oh wait, I forgot, you're fine with shitting damage. When have I said I want the Chrome turret damage back? I've re...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2015.03.05 05:18:00
|
394. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV and SHAV Progression - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Tesfa Alem wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: Tanks were fine during Chrome. CCP Rattati wrote: Now go forth and fit them and demonstrate why we should, or should not make changes. Please post ProtoFit links whenever possible! You're on...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2015.03.05 05:17:00
|
395. I should have known better. - in General Discussions [original thread]
RemingtonBeaver wrote: First day of the event. Nothing but full proto squads running ambush all day. "Because we kill faster"~ Scrubby McScrub Scrub No, it's because you don't want to lose a suit and you're a ****. This is why we can'...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2015.03.04 20:21:00
|
396. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV and SHAV Progression - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Tanks were fine during Chrome.
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2015.03.04 20:14:00
|
397. [Request] Reduce rail turret and forge efficiency against infantry. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
KA24DERT wrote: I think it's time we admit that Rails and Forges are too effective at sniping infantry. I can't think of any other AV weapon in the game that doubles as an AI weapon in a MORE deadly capacity than it's AV role. The current bala...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2015.03.04 17:46:00
|
398. Sticky:[Feedback] Transporters - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
They'll be camped regardless of efforts to prevent. I think it's a bad idea that can't, not won't be implemented properly. It will be abused.
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2015.03.04 17:24:00
|
399. (CPM/DEVS) Missions and why we don't bother - in General Discussions [original thread]
1200 AUR to activate it 3 times vs 100 AUR to reroll it. Rerolling wins.
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2015.03.04 13:53:00
|
400. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV and SHAV Progression - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Breakin Stuff wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: Breakin Stuff wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: Breakin Stuff wrote: Doom Then stop treating us as if we were hostages. You two aren't hostages. You are unwilling to compromise on any point for ...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2015.03.03 18:34:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 [20] 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |