| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 [60] 70 80 90 100 200 300 |
1181. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Thaddeus Reynolds wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: True Adamance wrote: I always die with my HAV. I run a scout suit inside with a rep tool. That depends Spkr I've fought against pretty much all the big names of my time as a tanker I can't spe...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2015.01.04 19:47:00
|
1182. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Text Grant wrote: While we are changing vehicles, I hope that you at least consider changes to the large blaster turret. A blaster tank is very effective vs infantry, and fairly effective vs enemy tanks. Because of this, it is easily the go to ...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2015.01.04 19:46:00
|
1183. Why are tanks here? - in General Discussions [original thread]
JARREL THOMAS wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: JARREL THOMAS wrote: I mean really why are they even here if infrantry don't want to be killed even suppressed by them. They want tanks to be AV? You guys already have arguably op av. Theres nothin...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2015.01.04 19:41:00
|
1184. Why are tanks here? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Nothing Certain wrote: Same bad arguments about needing multiple players to kill 1 player. ISK should give you an advantage. A Proto weapon costs 40X what a STD one does and does between 10-20% more damage. A well fitted tank costs 4-5 times a ...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2015.01.04 19:39:00
|
1185. Why are tanks here? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Buwaro Draemon wrote: Also we need prototype vehicles. You guys see what STD swarms do to a well fitted STD hull tank? Yeah, well that's how it is going to be when it becomes Proto tank vs Proto AV Maybe even more on the tanks favor becaus...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2015.01.04 19:37:00
|
1186. Why are tanks here? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Buwaro Draemon wrote: Infantry is nothing but hypocrites nowadays. They live the game by double standards. The only time I get mad at a tank is when the tanker decides to camp our redline. Other than that, they are fine on my book. So I s...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2015.01.04 19:35:00
|
1187. Why are tanks here? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Piraten Hovnoret wrote: My average suit cost 220k isk bud. ( with 300-600hp ) a militia suit can f-u-c-k me up any day and that is as it should be. You just want easy/God mode. So your scrubby tank that cost 400+k is not expensive. I don'...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2015.01.04 19:32:00
|
1188. Why are tanks here? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Racro 01 Arifistan wrote: my soma only costs me base its base price of 56k. AND. its fully fitted. millita heavy shield extender BP. 2x millita heavy armour repair BP's millita 80gj blaster. at only 56k isk I can give AV and annoying ass t...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2015.01.04 19:25:00
|
1189. Why are tanks here? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Alaika Arbosa wrote: I am all for coming to a sensible balance, IDK how true that is for you though.... There is no "sensible balance" when infantry has been dictating the direction of vehicles since the beta was available on weekends.
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2015.01.04 19:24:00
|
1190. Why are tanks here? - in General Discussions [original thread]
H0riz0n Unlimit wrote: I m a 30+ milion vehiculist and the only match i enjoy are the ones in which i fight against duna and his brothers or delboy...for the rest is only a waste of isk Guess you haven't gone against me then.
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2015.01.04 19:22:00
|
1191. Why are tanks here? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Piraten Hovnoret wrote: So tankers want to go back how it was a cupule of builds ago ? That was when almost a hole team could fire on a tank and he just sat there out reping everything. Yeah right From the bottom of my hart Go **** your s...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2015.01.04 19:19:00
|
1192. Why are tanks here? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Acturus Galaxy wrote: If rail would get splash everyone would use rails and snipe all other installations, infantry and vehicles from far away. Rails used to have splash. Then it got removed because infantry complained that we had good aim. ...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2015.01.04 19:15:00
|
1193. Why are tanks here? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Draden Brohiem wrote: JARREL THOMAS wrote: True Adamance wrote: Lolworthy thread is lolworthy. Then what is our role? Scenery lol! In all seriousness though, I'm a tanker. It sucks?! I'm almost happy to see another tanker on the en...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2015.01.04 19:09:00
|
1194. Why are tanks here? - in General Discussions [original thread]
JARREL THOMAS wrote: I mean really why are they even here if infrantry don't want to be killed even suppressed by them. They want tanks to be AV? You guys already have arguably op av. Theres nothing good for us here but to be killed by each oth...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2015.01.04 19:05:00
|
1195. STOP PLACING UPLINKS IN CONFINED SPACES!!! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Research CLONE54344 wrote: Please! Please! I beg you clone! No More! Certainly stop this practice in ambush. It creates an ambush when we have to spawn into a shooting gallery operated by the opposing team......i don't even like carnivals. Pl...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2015.01.04 19:04:00
|
1196. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
True Adamance wrote: I always die with my HAV. I run a scout suit inside with a rep tool. That depends Spkr I've fought against pretty much all the big names of my time as a tanker I can't speak for before them since I was not a tanker but I t...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2015.01.04 07:27:00
|
1197. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
True Adamance wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: Pokey Dravon wrote: I want to be part of the battle as a whole , not just the vehicle fight. Blame infantry for that. But you can't. lolwut. ALL THEY DID for 3 years is complain about veh...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2015.01.04 04:40:00
|
1198. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
True Adamance wrote: I'm actually for mandatory Small Turrets. I though it was a very nuanced aspect to the balancing of HAV fitting that was more or less a necessity. No, because again, there was no way to get some giant idiot of a blue dot ...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2015.01.04 04:24:00
|
1199. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Pokey Dravon wrote: I want to be part of the battle as a whole , not just the vehicle fight. Blame infantry for that.
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2015.01.04 04:17:00
|
1200. To whole those calling Tanks Glass Cannons - in General Discussions [original thread]
True Adamance wrote: Tanks are not glass cannons, nor should they be IMO, however there are very clear imbalances in terms of the HAV right now. The Shield HAV IS OVERPOWERED. No, armor tanks are incredibly weak right now. Why nerf shield ...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2015.01.04 04:09:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 [60] 70 80 90 100 200 300 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |