| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
481. Vehicles need to compliment infantry, not compete with them - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
You don't really give up your tank bashing ability with blasters. You can still fight tanks as well as infantry. Plenty of people manage it as the blaster tank can take advantage of its turret speed to dance around a rail tank and stay away from i...
- by Skihids - at 2014.02.28 19:21:00
|
482. Help for a new ADS pilot - in General Discussions [original thread]
You only need the basic afterburner because it lasts long enough to get you out of danger and recovers faster than your shields or armor will. Don't waste the fitting and ISK on anything higher. I run a basic heavy armor rep and it saves my bacon...
- by Skihids - at 2014.02.28 18:35:00
|
483. Vehicles need to compliment infantry, not compete with them - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Let's see what CCP does when they deploy PvE. What happens when they are on the other side and we bring in seven blaster tanks? Can we tell them to "Get Good" when we mow down rank after rank of drones who are unable to scratch our armor, while ...
- by Skihids - at 2014.02.28 18:27:00
|
484. Vehicles need to compliment infantry, not compete with them - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
If multi-level cities solve everything we can eliminate vehicle caps and everything will be fine because nothing will be so demonstrably better that everyone will want to use it. But no, most levels are dominated by open ground. Tanks as they ar...
- by Skihids - at 2014.02.28 17:42:00
|
485. I have discovered a new found hate for the spawn on point mechanic - in General Discussions [original thread]
Spawn on objective is a game crippling mechanic. What the hell are CRUs supposed to be for when you can simply teleport sans uplink? Why bother with uplinks when you own the point? It removes what little strategy there is in the game and reduces...
- by Skihids - at 2014.02.28 17:26:00
|
486. Vehicles need to compliment infantry, not compete with them - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
You can still run a small logistics role that doesn't depend on shooting faces by concentrating on equipment deployment, but it will be harder in 1.8 with the equipment nerfs and the need to skill into multiple races, half of which are unsuited to...
- by Skihids - at 2014.02.28 17:16:00
|
487. Vehicles need to compliment infantry, not compete with them - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
You simply can't have one class of infantry killing suit that splits its opponents into two classes, one that can't touch it, and the other that can, but now at a big disadvantage to defending itself against other infantry. That split magnifies i...
- by Skihids - at 2014.02.28 16:43:00
|
488. Hands on with DUST 514's "next major evolution" at Fan... - in General Discussions [original thread]
calisk galern wrote: they are creating occulus rift controls for dust. The PS3 is incapable of driving the Oculus Rift, and even the PS4 probably won't have the power. Now Sony is working on a headset that probably won't be as god but will...
- by Skihids - at 2014.02.28 15:02:00
|
489. Tanks are NOT OP - in General Discussions [original thread]
What's up with these presentations which are really rambling audios with a completely unrelated match video for background? The video content serves only to distract from the fact that you can't make your point clearly and succinctly. I kept wait...
- by Skihids - at 2014.02.28 14:02:00
|
490. Hands on with DUST 514's "next major evolution" at Fan... - in General Discussions [original thread]
The announcement promises "hands on", so one would assume there will be at least a beta build of this "new evolution". Therefore it can't all be pie in the sky promises (though there is sure to be plenty of that as well). My money is on PvE. They...
- by Skihids - at 2014.02.28 13:19:00
|
491. radar and vehicles fix? - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
We've got TCAS in the real world today, you'd think an advanced technology would have something similar.
- by Skihids - at 2014.02.27 18:49:00
|
492. Vehicles need to compliment infantry, not compete with them - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
I wasn't advocating or suggesting most folks were advocating for ADV and PRO tiers of vehicles. I was using it as a way to compare it to the dropsuit. If the MLT version of the HAV was better than the PRO version of the suit, imagine what the PRO ...
- by Skihids - at 2014.02.27 18:05:00
|
493. Dear CCP Please top my torture!!! - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Thanks for the tip. I'm getting random gun firing and reloading on sprinting after spawning and I'll bet this is the cause.
- by Skihids - at 2014.02.27 06:00:00
|
494. Vehicles need to compliment infantry, not compete with them - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
There is no way to balance vehicles when they compete for the same role as a dropsuit. All versions of a role need to be equally powerful or you need to use the best one to be competitive. Right now blaster tanks are the best fitting for slaying i...
- by Skihids - at 2014.02.26 22:48:00
|
495. Would you be willing to wait? - in General Discussions [original thread]
I won't biomass, I've got far too much time and money spent. I also like a quick match so I wouldn't disappear or long stretches, but if we don't get my game modes beyond TDM and vehicles still compete directly with infantry for infantry kills I...
- by Skihids - at 2014.02.26 18:43:00
|
496. Tanks - Real Tanks to our Imaginary tanks - in General Discussions [original thread]
Vehicles need to compliment infantry, not compete with them. It's not only required, it's a good idea. There is no way to balance vehicles when they compete for the same role as a dropsuit. All versions of a role need to be equally powerful or yo...
- by Skihids - at 2014.02.26 13:46:00
|
497. The basic HAV goal - in General Discussions [original thread]
HAVs need a purpose is what they need. They need a role of their own, not to compete with infantry to slay infantry one at a time. As long as they compete directly with infantry they will need to be just as vulnerable. Give them a different rol...
- by Skihids - at 2014.02.26 03:49:00
|
498. TankBush - in General Discussions [original thread]
TheD1CK wrote: I repeat..... HAV limits 2 in Ambush 3 in Domination 4 in Skirmish Until enough people agree and push CCP to do this, Enjoy the Tank spam !!!! Artificial caps on otherwise OP suits is not the way. Tanks need to be given a...
- by Skihids - at 2014.02.25 20:18:00
|
499. TankBush - in General Discussions [original thread]
What's happening is that players are choosing the more appropriate suit for the task at hand. The task is to slay infantry and there is one suit that does so far better than all the rest. It has far more eHP, DPS, and speed than every other suit...
- by Skihids - at 2014.02.25 20:12:00
|
500. New Dev blog Up! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Heathen Bastard wrote: Obodiah Garro wrote: A satellite launcher huh. Woop Woop. This is going to change everything guys get hyped! Seriously though, instead of making new buildings, take what you got and make it look not so much ass? Good...
- by Skihids - at 2014.02.25 19:20:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |