| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
461. CCP Falcon, other CCPs, and lore gurus: some clone questions - in General Discussions [original thread]
Aero Yassavi wrote: Skihids wrote: Aero Yassavi wrote: Skihids wrote: They are all stock clones. How could they be anything else when you can clone jump anywhere in the galaxy? Think about it. The game ignores clone cost in all but P...
- by Skihids - at 2014.03.01 06:00:00
|
462. "Next major evolution of Dust 514 of Fanfest 2014" - in General Discussions [original thread]
Could it be the dynamic map building system detailed at the Fanfest talk "Seeding the Universe" that we were promised a year ago? No probably not.
- by Skihids - at 2014.03.01 05:55:00
|
463. CCP Falcon, other CCPs, and lore gurus: some clone questions - in General Discussions [original thread]
Aero Yassavi wrote: Skihids wrote: They are all stock clones. How could they be anything else when you can clone jump anywhere in the galaxy? Think about it. The game ignores clone cost in all but PC because it would bankrupt players other...
- by Skihids - at 2014.03.01 05:51:00
|
464. CCP Falcon, other CCPs, and lore gurus: some clone questions - in General Discussions [original thread]
Cody Sietz wrote: I will find the link, but first, I will answer the questions. We use stock clones. Female clones were recently manufactured because when a women use a male clone, the mental toll was high. I thought you were going to bed.
- by Skihids - at 2014.03.01 05:48:00
|
465. CCP Falcon, other CCPs, and lore gurus: some clone questions - in General Discussions [original thread]
They are all stock clones. How could they be anything else when you can clone jump anywhere in the galaxy? Think about it. The game ignores clone cost in all but PC because it would bankrupt players otherwise. Yes, your fitting is free, but you ...
- by Skihids - at 2014.03.01 05:41:00
|
466. The basic HAV goal - in General Discussions [original thread]
Godin Thekiller wrote: Skihids wrote: Third person view is there in EVE because its the only way to enjoy the pretty spaceship you bought and there is no real need for the immersion of first person. Navigation is all point and click. Magic d...
- by Skihids - at 2014.03.01 05:12:00
|
467. The basic HAV goal - in General Discussions [original thread]
Third person view is there in EVE because its the only way to enjoy the pretty spaceship you bought and there is no real need for the immersion of first person. Navigation is all point and click. Magic drone cameras are a convenient explanation th...
- by Skihids - at 2014.03.01 02:02:00
|
468. The basic HAV goal - in General Discussions [original thread]
It's simple. You can't balance tanks as long as their role is AI and still have them recognizable as tanks. They can be used solo as AI, so they have to be just as vulnerable as any other player in a one-on-one fight or they have a clear advanta...
- by Skihids - at 2014.03.01 00:39:00
|
469. Planetary Conquest is a wash!! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Patrick57 wrote: Alabastor 'TheBlaster' Alcar wrote: PC needs to be shut down Do you know how many people would quit because of this? PC is the only fun thing about this game, unless you consider stomping noobs left and right "fun". Lol...
- by Skihids - at 2014.03.01 00:27:00
|
470. Vehicles need to compliment infantry, not compete with them - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Skihids wrote: You don't really give up your tank bashing ability with blasters. You can still fight tanks as well as infantry. Plenty of people manage it as the blaster tank can take advantage of its turret speed to...
- by Skihids - at 2014.02.28 23:41:00
|
471. Why CCP is in no hurry to move over to PS4. - in General Discussions [original thread]
low genius wrote: Sir Petersen wrote: "OVER 90% OF GAMERS DO NOT OWN A GÇÿNEXT-GENGÇÖ CONSOLE" http://videogamedebate.com/2014/02/27/how-many-people-have-ps4-xbox-one/ and because occulus rift is going to make 'next gen consoles' irrel...
- by Skihids - at 2014.02.28 22:41:00
|
472. Is the reduced speed when hit a bug, or is it intended? - in General Discussions [original thread]
It's really frustrating when the rounds are pounding your back and acting like a tractor beam rather than a push. It completely hoses speed tanking and induces rage. I feel the hand of CCP holding me in place to be killed and it makes me want to ...
- by Skihids - at 2014.02.28 22:34:00
|
473. Having a low k/d ratio doesn't make you a logi or scout. - in General Discussions [original thread]
WonLon Tong wrote: It's insulting to REAL scouts and logis using their class as an excuse to be bad. I'm not "bad" even if I have a less than even KDR. My worth is not measured in KDR. That's a myopia suffered by the slayer class.
- by Skihids - at 2014.02.28 21:32:00
|
474. Your Dev Blogs are a Joke - in General Discussions [original thread]
I'm ok with Dev Blogs on "soft" topics, but make them worth my time. This one was phoned in. You can make them interesting. You can make me care about the person in the "spotlight". You can at least act as if you tried. This one failed in all r...
- by Skihids - at 2014.02.28 21:29:00
|
475. Why are the rich so Rich & the poor so Poor?! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Allowing a few to become billionaires and throw proto gear around like it was militia for months makes me question CCP's will to make this economy work. Meanwhile they fret about the virtual "losses" they incur as a result of selling BPOs for real...
- by Skihids - at 2014.02.28 21:14:00
|
476. 80GJ weapons... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Charlotte O'Dell wrote: Did you know that you can dig a small trench under the barrel of an m2.50 just by firing it because the shockwave is just that crazy? And that's in hard packed dirt. My railgun should kill the whole map. It's kind of...
- by Skihids - at 2014.02.28 20:30:00
|
477. 80GJ weapons... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Fraceska wrote: 7 kilometers per second, damn that's fast. Whatever it hits is done for. There should be no survival from these weapons. Even a glancing it is going to create a pressure wave that is going to tear you apart. "Shields" is only go...
- by Skihids - at 2014.02.28 20:23:00
|
478. Vehicles need to compliment infantry, not compete with them - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
And that's the issue. One man is great at murdering all infantry, both those who gimp themselves to fight them and those with no ability to hurt them. It's great that rails can hunt blasters, but that simply throws your hands up in the air and g...
- by Skihids - at 2014.02.28 19:53:00
|
479. Vehicles need to compliment infantry, not compete with them - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Spkr4theDead wrote: Skihids wrote: You don't really give up your tank bashing ability with blasters. You can still fight tanks as well as infantry. Plenty of people manage it as the blaster tank can take advantage of its turret speed to danc...
- by Skihids - at 2014.02.28 19:41:00
|
480. Rollover SP - in General Discussions [original thread]
There is no need for complicated expiration systems for active SP. Really. It simply accumulates. Active SP boosters would be sold not by "time", but by "SP amount". A weekly active booster would morph into a 194,000 SP booster. It boosts that ...
- by Skihids - at 2014.02.28 19:36:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |