| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 |
341. [REQUEST] Remove WP penalty for blue dots who die in my DS - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Daedric Lothar wrote: Or when you send it into a downward plunge at max speed. *Cough* *Cough* I'm a dedicated pilot so I don't grief my passengers, but you could just remove it for burning ships if that makes people happy.
- by Skihids - at 2013.04.02 19:31:00
|
342. You should not be able to join a match that's about to be finished - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
It's a real problem when one side has got a lock on the match either by clone count or MCC damage. Folks will bail from the losing side to avoid a recorded loss and most of their replacements will also bail. That leads to cycling dozens of mercs ...
- by Skihids - at 2013.04.02 19:27:00
|
343. [SUGGESTION] Remove AFK SP Retroactively - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
mollerz wrote: Skihids wrote: You have two options: 1) PreventAFK rewards in real time when you can and let the rest go 2) Prevent what you can in real time and get the rest after the fact The first option will lead to an arms race with CC...
- by Skihids - at 2013.04.02 19:20:00
|
344. [REQUEST] Remove WP penalty for blue dots who die in my DS - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
It's not my fault if they don't jump when my ship catches fire.
- by Skihids - at 2013.04.02 19:03:00
|
345. [SUGGESTION] Remove AFK SP Retroactively - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Cross Atu wrote: Option #3 - Don't have the primary source of SP awards be time spent in match. You had [u]zero]/u] AFK'ers until CCP introduced that mechanic. At minimum invert it so that WP earn 5 SP and seconds in match are on a 1:1 ratio. ...
- by Skihids - at 2013.04.02 18:53:00
|
346. [SUGGESTION] Remove AFK SP Retroactively - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Daedric Lothar wrote: You have a valid point, but good luck on any detector or enforcement. With rapid fire controllers, smart keyboards, just holding down the run button, shooting a few people then holding down the run button. There are alot o...
- by Skihids - at 2013.04.02 18:35:00
|
347. [SUGGESTION] Remove AFK SP Retroactively - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
I really don't care about the current farming, but that isn't up to me. I'm just suggesting to CCP that any detector should have the ability to post process battle logs to retroactively process battles in order to be an effective deterrent. We c...
- by Skihids - at 2013.04.02 17:43:00
|
348. [SUGGESTION] Remove AFK SP Retroactively - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Arkena Wyrnspire wrote: I'm against AFK SP farming, too, but how would CCP detect this? Don't assume they're wizards. This is a server based game, so every action you perform is sent to the Battle Server where it s recorded in a log. CCP can...
- by Skihids - at 2013.04.02 12:57:00
|
349. [SUGGESTION] Remove AFK SP Retroactively - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Announcing a date for retroactive AFK SP removal is fine. The point is any idle detector is going to have some holes, and CCP needs to be able to close them retroactively if it wants to have an effectve deterrent. Otherwise people will be constant...
- by Skihids - at 2013.04.02 12:45:00
|
350. [SUGGESTION] Remove AFK SP Retroactively - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Banjo Hero wrote: Skihids wrote: I'm not suggesting this out of spite, ... Didn't think you were, bud! I was referring solely to my own character flaws. I shall leave your bank-robbery analogy be, not because it is inapt, but rather for f...
- by Skihids - at 2013.04.02 00:53:00
|
351. Vehicle only battlefield - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Just make the battlefield large enough and you would discourage hiking.
- by Skihids - at 2013.04.01 21:22:00
|
352. [SUGGESTION] Remove AFK SP Retroactively - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
I'm not suggesting this out of spite, but rather as the only way an idle detector can be truly effective. If we let bank robbers keep the money if they made it out of the bank we would have far more attempts. The only thing that acts as an effect...
- by Skihids - at 2013.04.01 21:17:00
|
353. [SUGGESTION] Remove AFK SP Retroactively - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
You have two options: 1) PreventAFK rewards in real time when you can and let the rest go 2) Prevent what you can in real time and get the rest after the fact The first option will lead to an arms race with CCP constantly playing catch up to the...
- by Skihids - at 2013.04.01 20:50:00
|
354. Small Railguns: Very Broke! - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Missiles used to be great against infantry, but the nerf put an end to that so I skilled into hybrids like you to equip one blaster and one rail only to find that the blaster was every bit as good as the rail at AV. That was the second time I was ...
- by Skihids - at 2013.04.01 19:50:00
|
355. Backside camera for tanks - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Bojo The Mighty wrote: HAVs can't have everything...NO Reason: You guys get to drive a tank and shoot a big cannon at the same time. Us LAV drivers have the sole focus of piloting paper mache, so we get the extra features. Yeah, because ba...
- by Skihids - at 2013.04.01 19:27:00
|
356. Vehicle only battlefield - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
It could be a limited spawn ambush mode to keep costs down.
- by Skihids - at 2013.04.01 14:59:00
|
357. [Request] HAV Module: Guided Airburst Anti-Infantry Plasma Missiles - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
How about MD turrets? After all, if a scout can carry it there is no reason you can't mount it on a vehicle. It should also have more powerful rounds or a higher RoF for being mounted.
- by Skihids - at 2013.04.01 14:56:00
|
358. Dropship improvement - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
It's just allowing infantry to shoot their little hand held guns fom my ship, so what's the problem? It's not like we are asking for more of the much more powerful vehicle mounted weapons that let you shoot from behind the protection of the ships...
- by Skihids - at 2013.03.30 14:16:00
|
359. [ Proposal ] Gunship - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Dropships aren't all that complicated to fly, and not that difficult once you put in sufficient practice. I've flown aerobatic aircraft with a stick and rudder and it is quite intuitive. It's the way all early aircraft were controlled. I would l...
- by Skihids - at 2013.03.30 01:40:00
|
360. Mass Driver area denial..NOT - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Alan-Ibn-Xuan Al-Alasabe wrote: If you fire five rounds into five clustered people it averages out to one-shotting them. Y'know, in case that helps. If five people stand around in a knot while five MD rounds land at their feet it's called a ...
- by Skihids - at 2013.03.28 21:21:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |