| Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 |
61. Tanks are meant to wreck you. - in General Discussions [original thread]
dogmanpig wrote: Shijima Kuraimaru wrote: Your siganture "Teamwork for thee, but no teamwork for me, such is the motto of the anti vehicle infantry." is blatantly false as HAVs have never required teamwork to be effective. when vehicle...
- by Shijima Kuraimaru - at 2013.12.13 10:53:00
|
62. Tanks are meant to wreck you. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Vesperz wrote: Shijima Kuraimaru wrote: Vesperz wrote: Ahem. Just destroyed two tanks yesterday using nothing but sticky RE's. Snuck up behind while it was busy shooting my team mates. Big explosions and kill points while running away gig...
- by Shijima Kuraimaru - at 2013.12.13 10:49:00
|
63. Tanks are meant to wreck you. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Spkr4theDead wrote: Jack McReady wrote: Himiko Kuronaga wrote: GET ATMESON wrote: Himiko Kuronaga wrote: Otherwise they wouldn't cost so much. No, you are not entitled to be able to fight back 1v1. That would make the entire risk vs...
- by Shijima Kuraimaru - at 2013.12.13 10:42:00
|
64. Tanks are meant to wreck you. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Vesperz wrote: Ahem. Just destroyed two tanks yesterday using nothing but sticky RE's. Snuck up behind while it was busy shooting my team mates. Big explosions and kill points while running away giggling. Number two? Dropped atop of a tank and ...
- by Shijima Kuraimaru - at 2013.12.13 10:15:00
|
65. It's time to add a reinforcement timer to Faction Warfare - in General Discussions [original thread]
Aero Yassavi wrote: I'm sorry, but battle after battle on the same district where each battle instantly decides who owns the district makes no sense and will never make sense. If you want EVE players to love us, keep us in the general location,...
- by Shijima Kuraimaru - at 2013.12.13 09:55:00
|
66. Tanks are meant to wreck you. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Sir Petersen wrote: Are there people out there who think the tanks are not OP? lol how is it possible to be so blind? Or is it ignorance that prevents some of you to see the obvious? Well they see it, but those who prefer easy kills with l...
- by Shijima Kuraimaru - at 2013.12.13 09:46:00
|
67. Tanks are meant to wreck you. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Himiko Kuronaga wrote: Krom Ganesh wrote: stuff The US military does not like our armor to get chinked. Scratches the paint job and annoys us. If the RPG threat was truly high to tanks, there would be some evidence of it in actual comba...
- by Shijima Kuraimaru - at 2013.12.13 09:18:00
|
68. Tanks are meant to wreck you. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Tanks? What tanks? Read my signature.
- by Shijima Kuraimaru - at 2013.12.13 09:18:00
|
69. It's time to add a reinforcement timer to Faction Warfare - in General Discussions [original thread]
Aero Yassavi wrote: Shijima Kuraimaru wrote: Just remember that right now, Dust provides a small contribution to faction warfare. Having one hundred times the mercs we currently have wouldn't change that right now. The majority of the impac...
- by Shijima Kuraimaru - at 2013.12.12 22:53:00
|
70. Tanks are meant to wreck you. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Himiko Kuronaga wrote: Korvin Lomont wrote: Himiko Kuronaga wrote: No, its meant to repel them. Tanks are supposed to be able to withstand the punishment to a degree. Hence the term tank. If they could not perform their job, nobody woul...
- by Shijima Kuraimaru - at 2013.12.12 22:21:00
|
71. THE TRUTH! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Got one HAV last night because it decided to try for two extra infantry kills after it's hardener when down. Other than that, every HAV I saw didn't turn on hardeners till it took an AV hit. Stuck around for a bit while hardeners were on stomping ...
- by Shijima Kuraimaru - at 2013.12.12 22:07:00
|
72. It's time to add a reinforcement timer to Faction Warfare - in General Discussions [original thread]
Just remember that right now, Dust provides a small contribution to faction warfare. Having one hundred times the mercs we currently have wouldn't change that right now. The majority of the impact in faction warfare is still made by the capsuleer...
- by Shijima Kuraimaru - at 2013.12.12 21:57:00
|
73. An honest call for reason. - in General Discussions [original thread]
You know, I keep looking at the market place and I still can't find a tank. All I can find are those HAVs. Just because it looks like a tank doesn't mean it is one. For example... The BTR-T Heavy Armored Personnel Carrier. (Yes, I know the HAV i...
- by Shijima Kuraimaru - at 2013.12.12 21:51:00
|
74. Redline Snipers and Tighter Maps? - in General Discussions [original thread]
My take on Redline snipers. I have an alt that I switch between Scout/ScR and Scout/sniper. I don't consider myself a good sniper by any means but I have my good days and my bad days. However, the only time I don't mind redline sniping is in Domi...
- by Shijima Kuraimaru - at 2013.12.12 21:26:00
|
75. Announcement:Uprising 1.7 Patch Notes - in General Discussions [original thread]
Edcas wrote: No one have noticed the orbital strikes nerfings?? Now they're more hard to make on faction wars,.. Someone have discovered the way to call'em again on faction contracts???? Please tell us!! The new gauss and combat weapons aren't...
- by Shijima Kuraimaru - at 2013.12.11 06:10:00
|
76. Proof Scrambler Pistols are OP - in General Discussions [original thread]
FAKIR REDETTa wrote: Cyrius Li-Moody wrote: CrotchGrab 360 wrote: calvin b wrote: If you think everyone is going to rush out and skill into the Scrambler Piston you are sadly mistaken. Before you say how great the weapon is try and use...
- by Shijima Kuraimaru - at 2013.12.09 04:21:00
|
77. Announcement:Uprising 1.7 Patch Notes - in General Discussions [original thread]
Fristname Family name wrote: Shijima Kuraimaru wrote: [ What I'm trying to say is that sure, vehicles are supposed to have some advantages. LAVs have speed, dropships have flight and troop carrying capacity, and HAVs have large turrets. All...
- by Shijima Kuraimaru - at 2013.12.08 14:07:00
|
78. Announcement:Uprising 1.7 Patch Notes - in General Discussions [original thread]
IAmDuncanIdaho II wrote: Shijima Kuraimaru wrote: I see your manipulation attempt. I could agree with you if all weapons were a legitimate threat to vehicles. However, part of your vehicle advantage is that all weapons, except the few AV we...
- by Shijima Kuraimaru - at 2013.12.08 11:01:00
|
79. Announcement:Uprising 1.7 Patch Notes - in General Discussions [original thread]
GENERAL FCF wrote: Really happy with the swarm nerf and much needed AR/SR range nerf but not happy with the Forge nerfs! Come on, we heavies are neglected as it is and only have two freaking weapons to choose from:/ At least fix the HMG and giv...
- by Shijima Kuraimaru - at 2013.12.07 21:15:00
|
80. Announcement:Uprising 1.7 Patch Notes - in General Discussions [original thread]
IAmDuncanIdaho II wrote: Viktor Vikrizi wrote: No new equipment.. dang It's gonna be in the new loyalty store Shijima Kuraimaru wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: Quote: [ bunch of stuff about infantry should be able to solo vehi...
- by Shijima Kuraimaru - at 2013.12.07 21:12:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |