| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 |
1121. AA flak gun - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Ops Fox wrote: vehicle turret that fires proximity AA rounds would be a powerful AA tool I was thinking of suggesting this myself- it could be a minmatar-made weapon (although minmatar are already getting autocannons and artillery for turrets).
- by Scheneighnay McBob - at 2012.10.28 16:49:00
|
1122. Lightly buff light railguns - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
STB Vermaak Doe wrote: Blasters also need more love more range/accuracy at least
- by Scheneighnay McBob - at 2012.10.28 16:31:00
|
1123. I don't get Laser Rifles - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Until AR recoil is fixed, ARs will be better. Since I'm using an advanced LR now, I can say that LRs get significantly better than ARs at long range when you use the higher-tier ones. My advanced LR can keep dishing out great damage (to shields) f...
- by Scheneighnay McBob - at 2012.10.27 17:05:00
|
1124. Lightly buff light railguns - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Average Joe81 wrote: Scheneighnay McBob wrote: As part of an Anti-Aircraft experiment, I fitted an LAV with a light railgun this weekend (standard, and with hybrid turret operation at II before people start talking about using militia) Firs...
- by Scheneighnay McBob - at 2012.10.27 16:51:00
|
1125. Ambush Isn't Really An Ambush (and it's spawning tends to screw you) - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
STB Vermaak Doe wrote: Maybe a real ambush mode could function like the old skirmish, attacking and defending a single MCC Hmm. maybe call the old skirmish assault?
- by Scheneighnay McBob - at 2012.10.25 23:05:00
|
1126. Lightly buff light railguns - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Average Joe81 wrote: Scheneighnay McBob wrote: As part of an Anti-Aircraft experiment, I fitted an LAV with a light railgun this weekend (standard, and with hybrid turret operation at II before people start talking about using militia) Firs...
- by Scheneighnay McBob - at 2012.10.25 22:55:00
|
1127. Why play against a 50-0 K/D ratio? - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Necrodermis wrote: IPA Maximus wrote: In match today I had an opponent go 50-0 using the "Gensnes Missile Launcher" the whole time. The top two players were him at 50/0 (3230 WP) and his corp member at 0/0 (1935 WP). While I'm all in favor ...
- by Scheneighnay McBob - at 2012.10.24 23:54:00
|
1128. [REQUEST] Scan Assists - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
The Robot Devil wrote: Something like a +1 Scanner Assist, enough to let people know you are doing your job, I like to lead while being in a logistics suit. I have all my scanning skills at level 3 and it does help. The active scanner only work...
- by Scheneighnay McBob - at 2012.10.24 23:28:00
|
1129. Burning Armor needs to be removed - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Zero Harpuia wrote: I agree with Noc. It's one of the many stupid advantages shields have over armor with no real equivalent drawback. Shield has boosters, Armor has reppers Shield has resist modules, Armor has active plates Shield has extende...
- by Scheneighnay McBob - at 2012.10.23 21:46:00
|
1130. [REQUEST] Scan Assists - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Eskel Bondfree wrote: Lead Squall wrote: Then again, right now I'd be happy with some more info on how the damn scanners work. For that, I'd like to point you to a post I made earlier in this thread. well, that completely ruins most o...
- by Scheneighnay McBob - at 2012.10.23 21:43:00
|
1131. Lightly buff light railguns - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Chunky Munkey wrote: I agree. They should be a viable long range AV option. They already have the long range going for them, but the dps really leaves a lot to be desired. I disagree about them rocking the target though. Explosives have that ab...
- by Scheneighnay McBob - at 2012.10.23 21:39:00
|
1132. [REQUESTING DEV feedback] active scanner-infantry equipment - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Abraham Lincolnbot wrote: I think this needs to be fixed the active scanner dosent seem to work good. it should be directional but should pick up soldiers. possibly there could be variations.
- by Scheneighnay McBob - at 2012.10.23 00:09:00
|
1133. [REQUEST] Scan Assists - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Hopefully there will also be active scanners for vehicles- Part of the reason I made this thread is because when fighters are released, I want to try fitting a bunch of scanning modules on a fighter to make a kind of "spy plane"
- by Scheneighnay McBob - at 2012.10.23 00:04:00
|
1134. ANTI-ARMOR... WHERE? - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
cody-p wrote: Ive been playing this beta since feb-march. and for the last few builds there has been a problem that goes unnoticed at least to me seems unnoticed. ive been in countless games where ppl call in dropships and out run the rockets t...
- by Scheneighnay McBob - at 2012.10.22 13:04:00
|
1135. Lightly buff light railguns - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
ugg reset wrote: Railgun's are ok. Their real selling point is that they can be used for long distance engagements where missiles are impractical due to slow speeds and can be avoided at range. Even the accelerated missile launcher is a little ...
- by Scheneighnay McBob - at 2012.10.22 13:00:00
|
1136. GET RID OF DUST/FOG EFFECTS - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Tony Calif wrote: I can't agree enough. **** graphics. **** the totally pointless water effects at the acid vats on biomass. GIVE ME GAMEPLAY (everyone should include an all caps message). This. I would rather play a game with great gamepla...
- by Scheneighnay McBob - at 2012.10.22 01:56:00
|
1137. Request: Active scanners Paint AV equipment. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
There could be a variety of active scanners that does this, while being less effective at actually scanning. Just like the repair nanohives (because of the additional use, they're less effective at being a nanohive)
- by Scheneighnay McBob - at 2012.10.22 01:52:00
|
1138. [REQUEST] Scan Assists - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Anybody ever try using a prototype active scanner? I hope what the description says about giving you a massive tactical advantage is true.
- by Scheneighnay McBob - at 2012.10.22 01:33:00
|
1139. Lightly buff light railguns - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
As part of an Anti-Aircraft experiment, I fitted an LAV with a light railgun this weekend (standard, and with hybrid turret operation at II before people start talking about using militia) First, I would like to say that it takes a good deal of p...
- by Scheneighnay McBob - at 2012.10.22 01:26:00
|
1140. [Feedback] Vehicle Balancing - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Mavado V Noriega wrote: GIZMO2606 wrote: Regardless what others might say, there needs to be some balance among vehicle and infantry. Right now it takes about a squad and a half sometimes two squads to take out a well fitted tank and takes a...
- by Scheneighnay McBob - at 2012.10.21 21:13:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |