| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 |
1061. My opinion after playing it: - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
if you wanna see way too small text fonts, you should've seen it 2 or 3 builds ago. Got headaches if I tried reading the font.
- by Scheneighnay McBob - at 2012.11.16 22:25:00
|
1062. My proposition to balance vehicles, turrets, and AV - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Tiel Syysch wrote: Scheneighnay McBob wrote: after actually reading more, my main argument is that this would make vehicle vs vehicle very very slow- possibly making it next to impossible for vehicles to destroy eachother if the drivers know...
- by Scheneighnay McBob - at 2012.11.16 03:08:00
|
1063. My proposition to balance vehicles, turrets, and AV - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
after actually reading more, my main argument is that this would make vehicle vs vehicle very very slow- possibly making it next to impossible for vehicles to destroy eachother if the drivers know what they're doing.
- by Scheneighnay McBob - at 2012.11.16 02:29:00
|
1064. My proposition to balance vehicles, turrets, and AV - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Tiel Syysch wrote: Scheneighnay McBob wrote: I stopped reading when you said it should take a tank-mounted anti-tank weapon to one shot a heavy. The idea is that there shouldn't be oneshots existing anywhere, but the nature of the railgun...
- by Scheneighnay McBob - at 2012.11.16 02:07:00
|
1065. My proposition to balance vehicles, turrets, and AV - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
I stopped reading when you said it should take a tank-mounted anti-tank weapon to one shot a heavy.
- by Scheneighnay McBob - at 2012.11.15 22:49:00
|
1066. Mass drivers and where they are going - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Not to mention the amount of ammo (total, not clip size) is terrible. On another note- last build, I was a scout with a mass driver- once you get it down (and when the shots don't bug), it's more effective than a scout with a shotgun.
- by Scheneighnay McBob - at 2012.11.15 22:47:00
|
1067. Turret installation AI configuration! - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Each to his own, I guess. Although I believe you're overestimating turret AI- they still will be smarter than a random blueberry, but not as smart as your average red dot.
- by Scheneighnay McBob - at 2012.11.15 22:25:00
|
1068. Turret installation AI configuration! - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Fivetimes Infinity wrote: I hope they never add AI beyond the most rudimentary for turrets, and that if you want the thing to shoot at vehicles instead of infantry you put a player inside of it and tell him to aim that way. What's wrong with ...
- by Scheneighnay McBob - at 2012.11.15 01:45:00
|
1069. [Request] ACTIVE dropsuit modules (similar to "superpowers") - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
CCP Wolfman wrote: Hi guys, Just thought IGÇÖd let you know that we do have plans to add some of the functionality youGÇÖre discussing here in future updates. Exactly which ones will remain shrouded in mystery for now. Some of the functionali...
- by Scheneighnay McBob - at 2012.11.15 00:16:00
|
1070. Turret installation AI configuration! - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Garrett Blacknova wrote: Just to be clear, when you say the "track X" options can be toggled, you mean that they'll ALL be active at once if you turn them all on, right? Also, a follow-up suggestion: Hacked turrets keep their settings, so the ...
- by Scheneighnay McBob - at 2012.11.15 00:12:00
|
1071. Turret installation AI configuration! - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
I just wanted to share an idea I came up with- what if we could manually configure how unmanned turret installations aim? This could be done by first operating a turret, holding R2 (or any other variants of the control to select active modules),...
- by Scheneighnay McBob - at 2012.11.14 03:03:00
|
1072. How to prevent a Goonswarm situation in Dust 514, in my opinion. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
ugg reset wrote: how would subdivisions prevent people from working together? Instead on one big monster we will have a hoard of little monsters working togeather. I'm here to play in a space sand box not to kitten and moan about politice. as...
- by Scheneighnay McBob - at 2012.11.13 22:19:00
|
1073. Take shield regeneration off tanks CCP... - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
ugg reset wrote: Keep the shield regen and give me a weapon that can tear through shield, deal decent damage on armor and is a viable option for vehicles and Infantry. soo. give you a proto laser rifle?
- by Scheneighnay McBob - at 2012.11.13 22:17:00
|
1074. I don't know IF I even want to play this anymore. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
xxwhitedevilxx M wrote: pew pew youredead wrote: Captain-Awesome wrote: if only ccp had made a "leave match" button, you wouldn't need to QQ about the pewpew. actually there is one I think it was sarcastic....you know those guys who ...
- by Scheneighnay McBob - at 2012.11.13 14:34:00
|
1075. Swarm Launcher - REAL Variants - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
I like it- I also have something similar here https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=43677&find=unread
- by Scheneighnay McBob - at 2012.11.13 14:14:00
|
1076. [Request] Change the Redline for hisec/lowsec - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
It should also be one-way; once you're out of the spawn area, you can't get back in.
- by Scheneighnay McBob - at 2012.11.13 13:46:00
|
1077. Take shield regeneration off tanks CCP... - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
xMarauder wrote: Scheneighnay McBob wrote: Only if we take infantry shield regen away with it- then everything will equally make no sense. There's no reason a HEAVY ASSAULT vehicle manned by 3 people should be easily destroyed by 1 person w...
- by Scheneighnay McBob - at 2012.11.13 13:36:00
|
1078. Take shield regeneration off tanks CCP... - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Only if we take infantry shield regen away with it- then everything will equally make no sense. There's no reason a HEAVY ASSAULT vehicle manned by 3 people should be easily destroyed by 1 person with AV gear at a fraction of the cost. Not to men...
- by Scheneighnay McBob - at 2012.11.13 02:59:00
|
1079. Multi-part plan to balance AV, and vehicles - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Aardwolf Pneumatic wrote: Missiles in general are the main issue. Splash damage and direct damage is excessive considering it out-ranges a railgun. Combined with shield tanks (which have active 30% damage reduction hardeners, none for armour ta...
- by Scheneighnay McBob - at 2012.11.12 23:05:00
|
1080. more dakka for blasters - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
fire rate isn't the problem- it's range/accuracy
- by Scheneighnay McBob - at 2012.11.10 22:57:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |