| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
1921. Module Discussion Return of the 180mm Reinforced Armour Plate - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Fizzer XCIV wrote: Part of the reason Shield Vehicles are so much better right now is that there isn't an Amarrian AV weapon, and Plasma Cannons are still not that good against vehicles, especially Dropships, but also HAVs, even Gunnlogis and S...
- by Pokey Dravon - at 2014.12.17 21:24:00
|
1922. Module Discussion Return of the 180mm Reinforced Armour Plate - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
If memory serves, the 180mm HP values were just 50% greater than 120mm yeah?
- by Pokey Dravon - at 2014.12.17 21:16:00
|
1923. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Sir Dukey wrote: Are we getting a repec? Please, it's only fair. When you introduced new suits in 1.8 you gave everyone a respec and since the whole system is being reworked I demand a FREE respec. Um....why? Any specialty HAVs would be bui...
- by Pokey Dravon - at 2014.12.17 21:11:00
|
1924. New sentinels..... again! - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Lady MDK wrote: Pokey Dravon wrote: Lady MDK wrote: One of the things i don't really get about heavies is how the sentinel reads like an anti vehicle platform, yet one of the currently available weapons it pretty much useless against vehi...
- by Pokey Dravon - at 2014.12.17 19:35:00
|
1925. Revamp missions to be role specific - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
When we interviewed Rattati on the Biomassed Podcast, he implied that something like this is on the roadmap. The missions we currently have are a base level that they used to roll out the system and make it accessible to a wide range of people. He...
- by Pokey Dravon - at 2014.12.17 19:08:00
|
1926. [Request]How Swarms should work - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Grimmiers wrote: Fox Gaden wrote: Actually if there was some player skill based way of causing Swarms to lose lock during flight, that would be an interesting AV dynamic. It would have to rely on good timing or some other player skill based...
- by Pokey Dravon - at 2014.12.17 18:50:00
|
1927. CRU love? - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Using CRUs as entry/exit points on the map?....I'm a little annoyed I had not thought of that earlier. I really like it.
- by Pokey Dravon - at 2014.12.17 18:13:00
|
1928. Plasma cannon/pilot dropsuit - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
I think it's a ridiculous idea that you have to be a pilot to pilot a vehicle. I shouldn't have to switch to a pilot suit just to get into an LAV to drive from point A to B, then switch back out. It doesn't take specialized equipment to drive a ca...
- by Pokey Dravon - at 2014.12.17 17:57:00
|
1929. What If? - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
TheD1CK wrote: Raid team balancing 12 Defenders Vs 16-18 Attackers Giving the Defending side an instant disadvantage. Not too sure on numbers but something like this could be possible, without being impossible Well if the District can't ...
- by Pokey Dravon - at 2014.12.17 17:33:00
|
1930. New sentinels..... again! - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Lady MDK wrote: One of the things i don't really get about heavies is how the sentinel reads like an anti vehicle platform, yet one of the currently available weapons it pretty much useless against vehicles but mows down infantry (HMG) and the ...
- by Pokey Dravon - at 2014.12.17 17:23:00
|
1931. What If? - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
I hope you don't think Im trying to rip your idea apart, the idea of public attack contracts has crossed my mind in the past too but obvious issues made me drop the idea to work on other avenues. Regardless if you want to discuss it that's fine. ...
- by Pokey Dravon - at 2014.12.17 17:18:00
|
1932. What If? - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
You understand my concern though? 95%-100% of the time the attacking team has zero chance of winning, so you have 2 options. 1. Payouts are similar to pubs - People would be better off fighting a pub match where they have a chance to win, rather ...
- by Pokey Dravon - at 2014.12.17 17:11:00
|
1933. What If? - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
TheD1CK wrote: Pokey Dravon wrote: The problem is that, while yes it gets randoms into PC, people will quickly realize that their team of randoms will *never* win against a trained, fitted, and coordinated Corporate PC team. It won't take lo...
- by Pokey Dravon - at 2014.12.17 17:01:00
|
1934. What If? - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
The problem is that, while yes it gets randoms into PC, people will quickly realize that their team of randoms will *never* win against a trained, fitted, and coordinated Corporate PC team. It won't take long for people to say "Why bother? I have ...
- by Pokey Dravon - at 2014.12.17 16:40:00
|
1935. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
DarthJT5 wrote: Pokey Dravon wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: Dergle wrote: There needs to be a vehicle for taking out infantry, otherwise there is no real point for vehicles. We had them, but we got punished for having good aim. Thus, th...
- by Pokey Dravon - at 2014.12.17 16:14:00
|
1936. New sentinels..... again! - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
I guarantee you that most Caldari Sentinels do not use armor plates. But yes, I could see a decrease to HMG damage and an increase to survivability. The issue with this of course is the Forge Gun, since Forge Guns are rarely used against infantry...
- by Pokey Dravon - at 2014.12.17 16:11:00
|
1937. New sentinels..... again! - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
To be fair, not all Sentinels will be affected by the changes to armor plates.
- by Pokey Dravon - at 2014.12.17 15:56:00
|
1938. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Spkr4theDead wrote: Dergle wrote: There needs to be a vehicle for taking out infantry, otherwise there is no real point for vehicles. We had them, but we got punished for having good aim. Thus, the blaster was nerfed. Blame infantry L...
- by Pokey Dravon - at 2014.12.17 15:53:00
|
1939. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
DeathwindRising wrote: what? how are you calculating damage reduction? You misunderstand, I was responding to a previous suggestion that Caldari Enforcer should get +2 to missile magazine capacity/lvl which would increase the incoming dam...
- by Pokey Dravon - at 2014.12.17 15:44:00
|
1940. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Breakin Stuff wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: Breakin Stuff wrote: I fully support this initiative and will provide likely TTK feedback for on foot AV based on current. My first thought is that we need to be careful with the things. We're at ...
- by Pokey Dravon - at 2014.12.17 07:25:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |