| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 |
501. Logi Question - in General Discussions [original thread]
Speedy McFaster wrote: How do you handle the multitasking? Repping people, revives, enemies that get too close, how you handle it? Its a lot, which is way I like the role. I have basic cal logi, with rep and needle and RR i'm not afraid to use....
- by Korvin Lomont - at 2014.03.11 09:11:00
|
502. Why the Heavy Will Not Be OP in 1.8 Part II - in General Discussions [original thread]
God Hates Lags wrote: So the last of these posts generated a fair amount of controversy, but the overwhelming opinion seemed to be that it wasn't the heavy suits themselves that were OP, but the fact that the HMG wasn't getting nerfed along wit...
- by Korvin Lomont - at 2014.03.11 09:01:00
|
503. Wait....are they nerfing tanks in 1.8? - in General Discussions [original thread]
darkiller240 wrote: please confirm they are Nope they are nerfing AV, tanking is still too difficult....on occasion HAVs get still destroyed by infantry
- by Korvin Lomont - at 2014.03.11 08:42:00
|
504. Well, I hate to admit it, but I was completely wrong. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Cody Sietz wrote: The next event ends in the 17th so there is no way we will get the update on the 14th(I didn't care that it wasn't a Tuesday) So yes, I was wrong and will now take your hate in lettered form. So the update will either be on ...
- by Korvin Lomont - at 2014.03.10 18:40:00
|
505. Instead of crap damage mods . . . - in General Discussions [original thread]
Sgt Buttscratch wrote: I'd sooner have different looking weapons.. aethetics are pleasing in games, My duvolle is a black militia AR..no difference. Lazy lazy development Not only that but even the iron sight wepons share the same model with...
- by Korvin Lomont - at 2014.03.10 18:35:00
|
506. I wonder if CCP realises.. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Tallen Ellecon wrote: The only thing keeping tanks off the field is more tanks. The food chain is, Infantry > Blaster tank > Rail tank > Proto Rail tank. Infantry can only go outside now because rail tanks are less effective against in...
- by Korvin Lomont - at 2014.03.10 18:32:00
|
507. I'M CALLING IT NOW! - NO RESPEC FOR 1.8! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Arkena Wyrnspire wrote: ReGnYuM wrote: I am confused Does no respec mean no reallocation of dropsuit command Presumably. I would be unsurprised if CCP saw this event as an excuse to not give out respecs, despite claiming that it won...
- by Korvin Lomont - at 2014.03.10 18:26:00
|
508. Sticky:The Respec Discussion Thread - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Tallen Ellecon wrote: The only time CCP even hinted there might be another respec was at EVE Vegas. They said if they did they'd only do one more. 1.8 isn't a big enough change to warrant it, and all the SP events since their announcements indi...
- by Korvin Lomont - at 2014.03.10 18:16:00
|
509. Request:Buff logistics suits in 1.8 - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Vespasian Andendare wrote: Korvin Lomont wrote: I would rather give logis more speed, honestly support players need speed to get where they are needed...and to keep up with all the front line grunts (assaults)... The problem with giving log...
- by Korvin Lomont - at 2014.03.10 18:13:00
|
510. ALL PLAYERS READ! IMPORTANT* CODE BLACK PRIOITY - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ripley Riley wrote: I will continue to run mostly STD fits like I always do... exactly ...
- by Korvin Lomont - at 2014.03.10 14:59:00
|
511. Request:Buff logistics suits in 1.8 - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Meee One wrote: Korvin Lomont wrote: Bendtner92 wrote: Really? Logis already have the most slots (and those extra slots means the lower health than Assaults is nullified) and are even getting buffed in 1.8 If anything they need to h...
- by Korvin Lomont - at 2014.03.10 14:42:00
|
512. Request:Buff logistics suits in 1.8 - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Bendtner92 wrote: Really? Logis already have the most slots (and those extra slots means the lower health than Assaults is nullified) and are even getting buffed in 1.8 If anything they need to have the same amount of high and low slots a...
- by Korvin Lomont - at 2014.03.10 14:27:00
|
513. Request:Buff logistics suits in 1.8 - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Meee One wrote: Korvin Lomont wrote: I would rather give logis more speed, honestly support players need speed to get where they are needed...and to keep up with all the front line grunts (assaults)... I would have 0 problems with this. ...
- by Korvin Lomont - at 2014.03.10 14:23:00
|
514. AV Weapons in 1.8 - in General Discussions [original thread]
Justicar Karnellia wrote: Although CCP (and everyone else) agree there is an imbalance in the eternal HAV vs AV design space, the only thing that's been hinted as so far is giving war points for damaging, and not destroying HAV's. This of cours...
- by Korvin Lomont - at 2014.03.10 14:08:00
|
515. Crd-9 Assault scrambler rifle - in General Discussions [original thread]
TechMechMeds wrote: Another easy mode nub fit, any scout with re's and a shotgun. People claim that this is hard mode. In fact it couldn't get much easier provided you have at least some brain cells to rub together. Hard mode scouts use knive...
- by Korvin Lomont - at 2014.03.10 13:35:00
|
516. Request:Buff logistics suits in 1.8 - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
I would rather give logis more speed, honestly support players need speed to get where they are needed...and to keep up with all the front line grunts (assaults)...
- by Korvin Lomont - at 2014.03.10 13:30:00
|
517. AV Weapons in 1.8 - in General Discussions [original thread]
Bormir1r wrote: Clearly the Swarms are UP, only Packed AV nades work and Forge Guns are viable up to a certain point, but even then Tanks can take on anything without dying. In addition to their powerful modules their speed makes it easier for ...
- by Korvin Lomont - at 2014.03.10 12:47:00
|
518. 1.8 scheduled for April 1st - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ripley Riley wrote: We are a third of the way through March and CCP still can't commit to a date for 1.8. Our community managers can only provide a month, which is like asking when dinner will be ready and being told, "Today sometime probably."...
- by Korvin Lomont - at 2014.03.10 12:13:00
|
519. Let's talk dust : Should scout really be called scout? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Monkey MAC wrote: Korvin Lomont wrote: Sinboto Simmons wrote: Honestly I don't think that scouts are much of their namesake many 'scouts' don't even carry scanners, myself included and I have proto, mostly due to logis being better for th...
- by Korvin Lomont - at 2014.03.10 12:03:00
|
520. Let's talk dust : Should scout really be called scout? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Sinboto Simmons wrote: Honestly I don't think that scouts are much of their namesake many 'scouts' don't even carry scanners, myself included and I have proto, mostly due to logis being better for the role period(gallogi even getting a bonus so...
- by Korvin Lomont - at 2014.03.10 11:26:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |