| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 |
681. Damage Resistance on Vehicles - in General Discussions [original thread]
ladwar wrote: LLAVs have base 30% resistance! We know. LLAVs are dumb.
- by Bendtner92 - at 2013.07.29 15:14:00
|
682. MAG population? - in General Discussions [original thread]
KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf wrote: I'm a 7x MAG vet. Dust is kind of dissapointing in game modes compared to MAG... well actually VERY disappointing. The entire game is disappointing compared to MAG.
- by Bendtner92 - at 2013.07.29 15:06:00
|
683. Aren't vehicles earned? - in General Discussions [original thread]
8213 wrote: I factored in everything. Yeah, no. Try factoring in CPU/PG.
- by Bendtner92 - at 2013.07.28 15:33:00
|
684. 10 months since a simple feature was promised: abandoned by CCP - in General Discussions [original thread]
It's actually funny reading through that thread. Just look at the OP for example. "WP for mCRU" use", where is that?
- by Bendtner92 - at 2013.07.27 14:21:00
|
685. Interesting thing about heavies/HMG - in General Discussions [original thread]
DJINN leukoplast wrote: Perhaps stronger vs AR's/SMG's, but my goodness they are a PITA to take out with mass drivers. Which should be the thing that kills them the fastest/most effectively. Seriously just stop being a bad player trying to ...
- by Bendtner92 - at 2013.07.27 11:52:00
|
686. Tournament rewards are simply not good enough. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Alldin Kan wrote: Even if damage is lower, you can't deny that it's great to show it off on the killfeed and get constant mails sent to you. I still have all that Officer stuff, so I can still bring it out
- by Bendtner92 - at 2013.07.26 18:23:00
|
687. Tournament rewards are simply not good enough. - in General Discussions [original thread]
King Kobrah wrote: Black ops LAV BPO by itself is better than the booster or the 40 crap tanks. The 50x of all dfiferent officer weapons and officer suits is ungodly, i've never gotten 50 balac's total in my merc career. i'd rather see 70m i...
- by Bendtner92 - at 2013.07.26 18:16:00
|
688. Tournament rewards are simply not good enough. - in General Discussions [original thread]
The Attorney General wrote: Is that where the Balacs SMG came from? I remember seeing Alldin running one once. Yeah, the three weapons were Balac's. The SMG was slightly worse than the Cala's I think, but they were still okay.
- by Bendtner92 - at 2013.07.26 18:12:00
|
689. Tournament rewards are simply not good enough. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Wait closed beta tourney had awesome rewards? 250 million ISK to the corp - fair enough, this was kind of big back then I would guess, although from what I heard when we finally got it they placed it in our EVE side wallet, and we didn't get it b...
- by Bendtner92 - at 2013.07.26 18:07:00
|
690. Thanks to CCP for fixing PC! (from the ANZACs) - in General Discussions [original thread]
Parson Atreides wrote: I think in the devblog a few weeks back, FoxFour said the average clone loss was about 80 per battle per side. I'll take a guess here and say that they didn't factor in no-shows and steamrolls in general. This screws up...
- by Bendtner92 - at 2013.07.26 13:11:00
|
691. Thanks to CCP for fixing PC! (from the ANZACs) - in General Discussions [original thread]
Parson Atreides wrote: When two good corps are going at it, 100 clones is going to be tough to win with, but not impossible. If SI, WTF and GAC hit you with a solid 16, you need to field a solid 16 to fight them off. If the clones amount was 13...
- by Bendtner92 - at 2013.07.26 12:45:00
|
692. Thanks to CCP for fixing PC! (from the ANZACs) - in General Discussions [original thread]
Parson Atreides wrote: CCP FoxFour wrote: Glad you are enjoying it! Have you been using clone starter packs? If so how do you feel about the 100 clone size? Price is too low for any corp that has a decently-sized wallet. During the LoI v...
- by Bendtner92 - at 2013.07.26 12:32:00
|
693. Passive SP should be on for all characters - in General Discussions [original thread]
We asked about this when they removed passive SP from all your characters, but they didn't give any reason at all for it. I especially requested it back, but there were no response on that.
- by Bendtner92 - at 2013.07.26 12:11:00
|
694. Thanks to CCP for fixing PC! (from the ANZACs) - in General Discussions [original thread]
CCP FoxFour wrote: Glad you are enjoying it! Have you been using clone starter packs? If so how do you feel about the 100 clone size? I know you didn't ask me, but I think they should be raised to 120-130 clones
- by Bendtner92 - at 2013.07.26 12:00:00
|
695. smexy gorillarape goes 377/1 with 18,890 WP. I smell boosting!!!!! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Deluxe Edition wrote: what game mode has 377 clones even available?I would take 3 to do this.... someone rezzing the alt over and ver and over again. You don't lose clones if you get revived.
- by Bendtner92 - at 2013.07.24 18:15:00
|
696. -Practice what you preach - in General Discussions [original thread]
Deluxe Edition wrote: I love how the HTFU crowd are the people who can't manage to take a single point in PC matches, or spend most of their time in the negative side of k/d ratios in pubs. They obviously understand game mechanics.
- by Bendtner92 - at 2013.07.24 18:11:00
|
697. An argument for a re-spec (From someone who has his stuff in the right place) - in General Discussions [original thread]
PsychoLogiKal PsyDrei wrote: It says 1.4 AND 1.5 for vehicle updates read again. So i stand corrected as in its ALSO in 1.5 not JUST 1.4 Also in your quote i Like how you left out the preceeding line that stated they would be in 1.4 as well.....
- by Bendtner92 - at 2013.07.24 10:10:00
|
698. 1.3 patch notes are up - in General Discussions [original thread]
CCP Wolfman wrote: The updated collision system will push infantry to the side of the vehicle rather than just pushing them along in front of it. The vehicle will be able to carry on going. Now you will have to be going very fast to do serious ...
- by Bendtner92 - at 2013.07.24 10:07:00
|
699. An argument for a re-spec (From someone who has his stuff in the right place) - in General Discussions [original thread]
PsychoLogiKal PsyDrei wrote: Aero Yassavi wrote: That said, the wording of the vehicle overhaul they are doing around Uprising 1.5 does sound like it is going to warrant another optional respec. You are the second person today I've had t...
- by Bendtner92 - at 2013.07.24 10:04:00
|
700. The respec issue - in General Discussions [original thread]
Malkai Inos wrote: Bendtner92 wrote: Yay for respecs. Signed by someone pretty satisfied with what he's skilled into. Yay for reading the OP to realize that this is against respecs. I know the OP is against respecs? I'm just saying th...
- by Bendtner92 - at 2013.07.24 10:01:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |