| Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 |
41. I have a doubt... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Apothecary Za'ki wrote: Cavani1EE7 wrote: Planteray Conquest servers are in US right? nowp. all ccp servers are in iceland i believe. TQ is the shared server both EVE and DUST players are on and is actually located in London I believe. ...
- by Bendtner92 - at 2014.11.09 14:45:00
|
42. [PSA] HOW TO USE OFFICER WEAPONS WITHOUT LOSING THEM - in General Discussions [original thread]
castba wrote: Would that not mean that just quitting dust towards the end of any battle would have the same outcome? The server still saves your progress in that case. With downtime it basically deletes the match.
- by Bendtner92 - at 2014.11.09 13:25:00
|
43. Scrutinizing the Long-Term of CCP Shanghai - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ronan Elsword wrote: Also Aeon, the fact that you're still asking the hard questions after months of silence is remarkable. However I doubt the community can see past these short term goals anymore. Most of the people who cared either moved on ...
- by Bendtner92 - at 2014.11.09 07:43:00
|
44. So I get the answers to my interview questions in a couple of hours - in General Discussions [original thread]
TechMechMeds wrote: I'll gladly see your sources though. According to you CCP told us about the meaning of 514 16 months ago, yet 14 months ago they said they wouldn't tell us. Kinda funny if they had already told us I think. Also, this f...
- by Bendtner92 - at 2014.11.07 10:33:00
|
45. So I get the answers to my interview questions in a couple of hours - in General Discussions [original thread]
TechMechMeds wrote: And you can gladly dig through about a year and a halfs worth of forum posts. I'll gladly see your sources though. Well, you're the one making the claims, so I'm still waiting. It's five-one-four (and not five-fourteen),...
- by Bendtner92 - at 2014.11.07 09:53:00
|
46. So I get the answers to my interview questions in a couple of hours - in General Discussions [original thread]
TechMechMeds wrote: Bendtner92 wrote: TechMechMeds wrote: We were already told that 514 is because the game was released on 5/14 We were told this. Again, WE WERE TOLD THIS ALREADY! False. For you maybe. For everyone. CCP has nev...
- by Bendtner92 - at 2014.11.07 09:24:00
|
47. So I get the answers to my interview questions in a couple of hours - in General Discussions [original thread]
TechMechMeds wrote: We were already told that 514 is because the game was released on 5/14 We were told this. Again, WE WERE TOLD THIS ALREADY! False.
- by Bendtner92 - at 2014.11.07 08:42:00
|
48. Announcement - Skill Cap Clarification - in General Discussions [original thread]
Breakin Stuff wrote: The original cap was voted on and passed by people who were used to seeing 20k+ SP per match, so no-lifing was a legit concern. No one realized CCP was gonna hack 75% of match rewards off the top. False I believe. We vot...
- by Bendtner92 - at 2014.11.06 15:29:00
|
49. Now you listen here, dammit - in General Discussions [original thread]
Zatara Rought wrote: I think the main thing here is that CCP is not backtracking and taking away the cap increase. Rather they simply failed to communicate better the needed clarity that when they said "increase weekly cap to 750k" they inten...
- by Bendtner92 - at 2014.11.05 17:38:00
|
50. incase you're wondering why there is no 750k SP cap - in General Discussions [original thread]
Jynx'D wrote: Quote: I think the main thing here is that CCP is not backtracking and taking away the cap increase. Rather they simply failed to communicate better the needed clarity that when they said "increase weekly cap to 750k" they in...
- by Bendtner92 - at 2014.11.05 17:25:00
|
51. Now you listen here, dammit - in General Discussions [original thread]
Zatara Rought wrote: I think the main thing here is that CCP is not backtracking and taking away the cap increase. Rather they simply failed to communicate better the needed clarity that when they said "increase weekly cap to 750k" they inten...
- by Bendtner92 - at 2014.11.05 17:19:00
|
52. CCP Trying to Backtrack on 750k SP Cap - in General Discussions [original thread]
Xocoyol Zaraoul wrote: Where have they exactly said this was a removed feature? Until they explicitly say so, I'll assume that this is yet another bug ina long list typical of patch days, like the last hotfix being accidently deleted. Editing...
- by Bendtner92 - at 2014.11.05 15:49:00
|
53. CCP Trying to Backtrack on 750k SP Cap - in General Discussions [original thread]
Nirwanda Vaughns wrote: i got a copy/paste of it from when i mailed a corp mate too thankfully. i can't believ they snekily edited the devblog/patchnotes thinking we wouldn't know hahaha thats really bad dev/player relations there Sounds like...
- by Bendtner92 - at 2014.11.05 15:25:00
|
54. Mobile CRU = Tanker bonus NOT Pilot bonus - in General Discussions [original thread]
Tesfa Alem wrote: Well here, CCP Bednter92, for contexual purposes we are seperating your interpretation of what CCP calls vehicle operators and are using the more common vernacular of Tank driver = Tanker, Dropship Pilot = Pilot. As evidenced...
- by Bendtner92 - at 2014.10.28 11:32:00
|
55. Mobile CRU = Tanker bonus NOT Pilot bonus - in General Discussions [original thread]
Tesfa Alem wrote: FC: ''Quick i need a Pilot for a PC, what do you fly?" Blueberry: "I'm a pilot!'' FC: ''Python or Incubus'' Blueberry: ''LAVs, duh. Just because I'm a Pilot doesn't mean I can fly '' That doesn't change the fact that ...
- by Bendtner92 - at 2014.10.28 11:15:00
|
56. Mobile CRU = Tanker bonus NOT Pilot bonus - in General Discussions [original thread]
Tesfa Alem wrote: CCP Rattati wrote: mCRU + LAV, wait until LAV is close to objective, stop, spawn 2 on it, flee when danger, repeat No harm in letting everybody get WP for a mobile Cru, but then we should treating it lke it is. We should...
- by Bendtner92 - at 2014.10.28 11:05:00
|
57. Announcement:Dev Blog: DUST 514 Dev Update - in General Discussions [original thread]
Spectral Clone wrote: CCP wrote: WeGÇÿre very happy to see that our player base remains both stable and active. In fact, we are currently seeing the highest engagement numbers in over a year, averaging around 300.000 Monthly Active (unique) ...
- by Bendtner92 - at 2014.10.17 10:16:00
|
58. Announcement:Dev Blog: DUST 514 Dev Update - in General Discussions [original thread]
jpmannu wrote: Ok. so my first thoughts go to those fools who biomassed their clones once project Legion was announced .... Maybe those people don't care about neither Dust or Legion? Edit: I also still don't believe CCP would actually give...
- by Bendtner92 - at 2014.10.16 15:14:00
|
59. Announcement:Dev Blog: DUST 514 Dev Update - in General Discussions [original thread]
Kevall Longstride wrote: Anyone want to say Dust is dying? I do.
- by Bendtner92 - at 2014.10.16 10:48:00
|
60. So, if Project Legion dies... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Thor Odinson42 wrote: I think it will be next to impossible for any person that's ever been under Dust's spell to NOT get a PC to play Legion. You think wrong then.
- by Bendtner92 - at 2014.10.15 06:04:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |