| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
3081. shield logi anyone? - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
I think rep tools should start shield recharge once you begin repping.
- by Alena Ventrallis - at 2013.12.21 05:42:00
|
3082. I hate to be so final but Rail Tanks are COMPLETELY BROKEN - in General Discussions [original thread]
I think if rails couldn't look higher than 20 degrees, then drop ships have the ability to stay out of their reach. At least tanks and LAVs can find cover. Dropships are just screwed.
- by Alena Ventrallis - at 2013.12.21 05:38:00
|
3083. What was in the last hotfix? - in General Discussions [original thread]
HMG got fixed. Works wonders now.
- by Alena Ventrallis - at 2013.12.21 01:52:00
|
3084. Discussion on balancing red line rail tanks - in General Discussions [original thread]
Pvt Numnutz wrote: Alena Ventrallis wrote: Suppose we only allowed the rail turrets to look up at a 20 degree angle? Think rail tanks should be able to engage a dropship on a fair fight, however the fight isn't fair when I can't get above...
- by Alena Ventrallis - at 2013.12.21 01:31:00
|
3085. laser rifle and 1.7 - in General Discussions [original thread]
What about getting rid of the wonky-ass damage profile, and removing the heat up mechanic?
- by Alena Ventrallis - at 2013.12.21 01:29:00
|
3086. Discussion on balancing red line rail tanks - in General Discussions [original thread]
Suppose we only allowed the rail turrets to look up at a 20 degree angle?
- by Alena Ventrallis - at 2013.12.21 00:41:00
|
3087. Swarms dont stop shields from recharging - in General Discussions [original thread]
To get back on topic: Suppose instead of having a certain damage stop the Regan, being hit by certain weapons stops regen? So only swarms and forge guns can stop regen, but they stop Regan regardless of damage? I think Thats a bit excessive, perh...
- by Alena Ventrallis - at 2013.12.20 15:40:00
|
3088. Swarms dont stop shields from recharging - in General Discussions [original thread]
Spkr4theDead wrote: [quote=Alena Ventrallis]LOL Bugger off with this one hardener BS. We're able to fit our tanks any way we want. Get the heck out of here and distribute your ISK. If any of us are to accept that, we need to accept some seriou...
- by Alena Ventrallis - at 2013.12.20 09:16:00
|
3089. [Request] Tiercide & specifics on how to implement it - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
I like OPs idea. Makes specializing so much better. Suppose we also do it like Eve does, and have a general Logistics suit skill? Meaning that if you unlock the logistics suit skill, and take minmatar suits to 5, you can use minmatar logi suits. ...
- by Alena Ventrallis - at 2013.12.20 08:39:00
|
3090. The Caldari Logistics suit - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Again, reducing proto's low slots by 1 (because proto CalLogis where the problem) and buff CPU on all models. Caldari have the highest CPU out of everyone, save on their logistics suit, where they are the lowest. And their method of tanking is CPU...
- by Alena Ventrallis - at 2013.12.20 08:27:00
|
3091. Swarms dont stop shields from recharging - in General Discussions [original thread]
The dark cloud wrote: So we have a weapon which does pathetic damage while a hardener is running and no im not talking about 2 or 3 hardeners its just 1. We are getting to a point where the passive recharge is greater then the inflicted damage ...
- by Alena Ventrallis - at 2013.12.20 08:25:00
|
3092. Active scanners: The worst thing to happen to dust? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Suppose we remove the "Scan Complete, Some margin of error" message completely? you scan, you see red dots appear on your radar, that's the end of it? Now dampened scouts can easily remain unknown, since you have no idea if there was margin of err...
- by Alena Ventrallis - at 2013.12.20 08:12:00
|
3093. The Caldari Logistics suit - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
jordy mack wrote: Alena Ventrallis wrote: I too think that 4 lows is over the top for a shield tanker. I think 3 lows is plenty for them. I just want to have my advanced CalLogi be able to fit more than just standard items. I can barely fit ...
- by Alena Ventrallis - at 2013.12.20 08:06:00
|
3094. Tanks for listening - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Math time. Sica has 2650 shield and 1500 armor. Proto swarms have 220 damage with 6 missiles, for a total of 1320 damage. add in sica's 20% resistance to missiles, we get 1056 total damage. x3 swarms is 3168 damage. that's assuming the 20% res...
- by Alena Ventrallis - at 2013.12.20 08:02:00
|
3095. The Caldari Logistics suit - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
I too think that 4 lows is over the top for a shield tanker. I think 3 lows is plenty for them. I just want to have my advanced CalLogi be able to fit more than just standard items. I can barely fit on advanced anything, and I have level 4 in all ...
- by Alena Ventrallis - at 2013.12.20 07:46:00
|
3096. Yes, more tank QQ (copy & pasted from War Room) - in General Discussions [original thread]
Were hardeners up? Yeah, he should survive.
- by Alena Ventrallis - at 2013.12.20 07:45:00
|
3097. The Caldari Logistics suit - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
But to make any decent fit requires a low slot be used on a CPU upgrade. Suppose we return its values to all tiers, and proto tier gives up a low slot in return?
- by Alena Ventrallis - at 2013.12.20 07:35:00
|
3098. The Caldari Logistics suit - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Now that shield tanking is no longer OP, and armor with damage mods is FOTM, what does the community think of returning CalLogis CPU to it? I think it can't hurt. Anything below proto is near impossible to fit well, and even if we don't take it ...
- by Alena Ventrallis - at 2013.12.20 07:21:00
|
3099. Active scanners: The worst thing to happen to dust? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Simply stop all character movement when a scan is initiated. Not that hard.
- by Alena Ventrallis - at 2013.12.20 02:52:00
|
3100. Helpless little infantry - in General Discussions [original thread]
I think the problem is not tanks, but the number of them that can be deployed at once. AV dealing with two tanks is manageable. 5-6, not so much. The price increase makes spamming then much less profitable, and those who do spam them will quickly...
- by Alena Ventrallis - at 2013.12.19 17:40:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |