| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 |
741. The cloak - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
One Eyed King wrote: Lightning35 Delta514 wrote: Georgia Xavier wrote: Scouts do need a bit of help, what with sub par scanning and whatnot. The Amarr scout needs the most help,It's slower than min assault at base speeds. It's appearance ...
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2015.03.30 22:41:00
|
742. Balance ideas and suggestions - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
SalvadorSlX7 wrote: Please tell me if something wrong cause i would love some feedback Good on you for sticking it out and coming to the Forums with your grievances and ideas. o7 PS: Shotgun optimal range is presently < 5m; I suspect it...
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2015.03.27 18:53:00
|
743. Reduce Ambush Squad Cap to 4 Players - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Pokey Dravon wrote: Nearly every bad ambush I have doesn't even have squads in it, it's just a giant blob. It doesn't take a squad or even coms to know how to join in on the stampede. I don't think reducing or removing squads in Ambush will hav...
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2015.03.27 16:23:00
|
744. Reduce Ambush Squad Cap to 4 Players - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Agreed on every point.
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2015.03.27 12:16:00
|
745. 2 ideas to discourage dual tanking slightly - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
All Scouts are all about sneaking. A sig penalty would handicap Cal and Min Scouts.
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2015.03.24 22:37:00
|
746. tanks tested - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
In your testing, did you find that AV was too effective or too ineffective?
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2015.03.24 16:50:00
|
747. ACR/CR - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Kinyuhk Goluhh wrote: The Assault Combat Rifle has terrible recoil and the Combat Rifle has terrible damage. I tested these two over and over comparing it to the Assault Rifle and chose in favor of it instead. 3/10 (if you're serious, keep ...
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2015.03.22 03:47:00
|
748. scouts can fly turn invisible an throw c4, an have super speed, wth... - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
3/10
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2015.03.21 21:31:00
|
749. Best way to make sniping better. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Quote: Best way to make sniping better. * Improve Zoom Fidelity * Add inertia to character movement
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2015.03.21 05:35:00
|
750. Remote Explosives - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
I've seen fewer REs since Echo.
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2015.03.21 04:43:00
|
751. Logi Buff proposal - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
el OPERATOR wrote: Adipem Nothi wrote: Creodron Flux 0 seconds - Scanner 1 fires 12 seconds- Scanner 2 fires 24 seconds- Scanner 3 fires 30 seconds- Scanner 1 ready 36 seconds- Scanner 1 fires 42 seconds- Scanner 2 ready Look Ma! ...
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2015.03.20 21:12:00
|
752. Logi Buff proposal - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
el OPERATOR wrote: Stay focused, ScrubShineBear! el OPERATOR wrote: And whats the lowest possible profile of the suit using it (a fully skilled, full proto GalLogi)? We're just getting your ducks together still, then we'll line them ...
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2015.03.20 20:55:00
|
753. Logi Buff proposal - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Mister Goo wrote: Adipem Nothi wrote: The point is that buffing whatever Nyain's spamming can't be a good idea. I will give you that much There is also no need to nerf it because it doesn't effectively change the balance of play for a...
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2015.03.20 03:01:00
|
754. Logi Buff proposal - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
The point is that buffing whatever Nyain's spamming can't be a good idea.
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2015.03.20 02:45:00
|
755. Logi Buff proposal - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Doesn't make one 'bit of difference whether or not a Scout can dampen under overpowered scans. Scouts could dampen under pre-Charlie CA Scout scans. Scouts could dampen under post-Charlie CA and AM Scout scans.
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2015.03.20 02:18:00
|
756. Logi Buff proposal - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Juno Tristan wrote: This is why I didn't post in the cpm thread, both of you **** off Your idea's borderline reasonable; it'd be out-of-place in the CPM thread.
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2015.03.20 02:00:00
|
757. Logi Buff proposal - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
el OPERATOR wrote: Hey, real quick, what is the target illumination time and the cooldown time for that "21 db 200m permascanner"? Creodron Flux 0 seconds - Scanner 1 fires 12 seconds- Scanner 2 fires 24 seconds- Scanner 3 fires 30 seco...
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2015.03.20 01:45:00
|
758. Logi Buff proposal - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
el OPERATOR wrote: Adipem Nothi wrote: Lightning35 Delta514 wrote: Gallente- 5% more range, scan, and profile when using any of the ewar mods Community: "Wallhacks are bad" "EWAR Scouts are bad" "Let's nerf EWAR Scouts" "Let's buff E...
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2015.03.20 00:33:00
|
759. Logi Buff proposal - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Pokey Dravon wrote: Juno Tristan wrote: Without the penalty you could get the same ehp as an assault I'm not saying they'd be better than assaults, but due to bandwidth (and lackluster cal/gal assault bonuses) I'd pick a slayer logi over an...
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2015.03.20 00:32:00
|
760. Logi Buff proposal - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Lightning35 Delta514 wrote: Gallente- 5% more range, scan, and profile when using any of the ewar mods Community: "Wallhacks are bad" "EWAR Scouts are bad" "Let's nerf EWAR Scouts" "Let's ignore permascan" "Let's buff Logi EWAR" Lol @ Co...
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2015.03.19 23:03:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |