| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 |
201. Pokey's Workshop - EWAR - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Llast 326 wrote: Adipem Nothi wrote: Breakin Stuff wrote: Adipem Nothi wrote: Llast 326 wrote: I believe WP by type can be limited with a cap. Intel assists for spotting could be limited to prevent mass accrual in Blob scenarios. A...
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2015.08.27 20:32:00
|
202. Distinguish between EVE Online Pilots and Dust 514 mercenaries - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
www.eve-offline.net
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2015.08.27 20:21:00
|
203. Pokey's Workshop - EWAR - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Thaddeus Reynolds wrote: Adipem Nothi wrote: Breakin Stuff wrote: Also adipem, if you successfully hit your target let the target ping. So that plus your aim down sight statement. 1. Scoping a target is a premeditated and precise tactic...
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2015.08.27 20:13:00
|
204. Pokey's Workshop - EWAR - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Breakin Stuff wrote: Adipem Nothi wrote: Llast 326 wrote: I believe WP by type can be limited with a cap. Intel assists for spotting could be limited to prevent mass accrual in Blob scenarios. Assuming I am correct that they can be cappe...
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2015.08.27 20:06:00
|
205. Pokey's Workshop - EWAR - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Llast 326 wrote: I believe WP by type can be limited with a cap. Intel assists for spotting could be limited to prevent mass accrual in Blob scenarios. Assuming I am correct that they can be capped. No telling. But I definitely wouldn't wan...
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2015.08.27 18:53:00
|
206. Pokey's Workshop - EWAR - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Alena Ventrallis wrote: I made a thread about active scanners here complete with spreadsheet. Basic idea is to make them active and work similar to a cloak. Reads almost exactly like what I wrote up the other day: Active Scans: Beam Scanni...
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2015.08.27 18:05:00
|
207. Pokey's Workshop - EWAR - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Breakin Stuff wrote: Also adipem, if you successfully hit your target let the target ping. So that plus your aim down sight statement. 1. "Scoping" one's target is a premeditated and precise tactical action. Spinning and spraying after gettin...
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2015.08.27 17:05:00
|
208. So , command points ? - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Shinobi MumyoSakanagare ZaShigurui wrote: So this is just nothing for me to even think about ? I'll just leave it alone then ... I thought that command points were important , I guess to the corp and not the individual then . I mean I unders...
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2015.08.27 16:12:00
|
209. So , command points ? - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Basic Idea: Complete Daily Missions. Earn Command Points for your Corp. Corp leadership spends Command Points on PC-related stuff.
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2015.08.27 14:56:00
|
210. Pokey's Workshop - EWAR - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Somewhat random thought and recommendation: Line-of-Sight target intel is not presently shared. If I recall correctly, it used to be, back in early Uprising and looking at Rattati's new EWAR grid, seems like it might be reinstated down the road. ...
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2015.08.27 14:26:00
|
211. Radius linked to ISK and SP pay-outs (Domination) - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Interesting idea. Any way it could backfire and exacerbate the "leave battle" problem?
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2015.08.26 15:56:00
|
212. Pokey's Workshop - EWAR - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Breakin Stuff wrote: I don't know how to describe how useless the radar is on a fatsuit. Perhaps when solo. Logi passives are incredibly strong and are shared throughout the squad. Tell your repslave to run a Precision Enhancer or three. Bet...
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2015.08.26 15:49:00
|
213. Pokey's Workshop - EWAR - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
CeeJ Mantis wrote: -Basic active scans aren't very good as they only scan heavies and basic equipment. Perhaps make it 42 instead of 46 so medium suits without dampening can be scanned, but ones with it can hide. Agreed 100% on this point. T...
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2015.08.26 13:21:00
|
214. [Suggestion] Scouts & Electronic Warfare - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
o/ Park! You make some good points, but if you want my opinion, I think we're all shooting blindly at a moving target. Changes and tweaks which might work well with present EWAR mechanics might not work well at all with future EWAR mechanics. Ye...
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2015.08.26 12:49:00
|
215. Pokey's Workshop - EWAR - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
haerr wrote: i thought further dust ewar changes would require ccp to rework code that they did not want to put the resources into reworking can someone confirm that ccp has changed their collective mind about this? Indeed! Rattati has a pos...
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2015.08.26 11:40:00
|
216. What should I work on next? - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
el OPERATOR wrote: "What stats/game conditions garnered the largest playerbase" is likely a topic of discourse at many game development companies the world over. I'd just like to see DUST's. And The Pokester wants a project. For those devel...
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2015.08.25 22:26:00
|
217. What should I work on next? - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
el OPERATOR wrote: I'd like to see a spreadsheet of playerbase numbers, actual players (IPs?) not just new alts, and their correlating update periods since from what I've seen these last two years is the more tinkering that gets done with base ...
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2015.08.25 21:51:00
|
218. What should I work on next? - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Breakin Stuff wrote: A lot of cruise missiles don't get detected on a lot of radar systems bexause their speed is below most system "missile warning" thresholds. Errr. I was under the impression that cruise missiles averted detection by clos...
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2015.08.25 15:20:00
|
219. What should I work on next? - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Sgt Kirk wrote: Maybe we could take this chance to dial back the Gallente Logistic Bonus as well as active scanners. Question is if people would want that and or which bonus part should go in favor of having a dampening affect while scanning. ...
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2015.08.25 12:56:00
|
220. What should I work on next? - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Breakin Stuff wrote: Adipem I cannot see any logical reason why being in shadow would assist ewar, which is not visual based Makes as much sense as crouching. Also, there are different types of scans involved: passive, active and line-of-sl...
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2015.08.25 12:11:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |