Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 :: [one page] |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Frank Devine
ZionTCD Legacy Rising
118
|
Posted - 2013.03.24 23:32:00 -
[1] - Quote
When I got the merc pack everything was to be refunded when this game came out if beta, since then I have also spent another 60.00 on AUR and I want it back as promises and I want my 3 day head start that I am suppose to get. |
Himiko Kuronaga
SyNergy Gaming
75
|
Posted - 2013.03.24 23:33:00 -
[2] - Quote
People in Hell want ice water. |
Buster Friently
Rosen Association
171
|
Posted - 2013.03.24 23:34:00 -
[3] - Quote
Frank Devine wrote:When I got the merc pack everything was to be refunded when this game came out if beta, since then I have also spent another 60.00 on AUR and I want it back as promises and I want my 3 day head start that I am suppose to get. lol
|
Mithridates VI
The Southern Legion
455
|
Posted - 2013.03.24 23:35:00 -
[4] - Quote
Frank Devine wrote:When I got the merc pack everything was to be refunded when this game came out if beta, since then I have also spent another 60.00 on AUR and I want it back as promises and I want my 3 day head start that I am suppose to get.
1: The game is not yet "commercially released" which was the wording used in the merc park terms. 2: Please provide evidence that the AUR you purchased had terms which specified that it would be refunded. 3: What three day head start? |
Thog A Kuma
Planetary Response Organisation Test Friends Please Ignore
45
|
Posted - 2013.03.24 23:36:00 -
[5] - Quote
aren't we still in beta?
|
Kleanur Guy
SyNergy Gaming
177
|
Posted - 2013.03.24 23:37:00 -
[6] - Quote
Frank Devine wrote:When I got the merc pack everything was to be refunded when this game came out if beta, since then I have also spent another 60.00 on AUR and I want it back as promises and I want my 3 day head start that I am suppose to get.
It was refunded with the new build, no more refunds. With the release of the new build you got a 1 week headstart on the new peeps, not to mention a free 1million SP for an event. That's more than you asked for isn't it? |
Corn In TheSkidmark
Expert Intervention Caldari State
48
|
Posted - 2013.03.24 23:38:00 -
[7] - Quote
Frank Devine wrote:When I got the merc pack everything was to be refunded when this game came out if beta, since then I have also spent another 60.00 on AUR and I want it back as promises and I want my 3 day head start that I am suppose to get.
Go out to your mailbox and wait, I sent everything you requested |
Mithridates VI
The Southern Legion
456
|
Posted - 2013.03.24 23:39:00 -
[8] - Quote
Originally, the Mercenary Pack stated: IMPORTANT NOTICE: During beta periods, CCP may need to reset characters, skills and other items included in the DUST 514-« Mercenary Pack. DUST 514-« Mercenary Pack will be credited in full to your in-game DUST 514-« account after each character reset and for the commercial release. CCP cannot guarantee all items will be identical and reserves the right to substitute items of similar value. No other form of refund is permitted.
In response to a petition I filed, CCP has clarified that we are not commercially released.
In response to a follow-up, seeking clarification on this issue, I've been told that the matter of Mercenary Pack refunds is under investigation, that it make take some time for a resolution and that once this resolution is found, CCP will publicly comment on the situation.
|
Laheon
Osmon Surveillance Caldari State
235
|
Posted - 2013.03.24 23:39:00 -
[9] - Quote
By "refund", do you mean the money you spent on it given back?
That was never promised. You were promised the Aurum you spent back, but not the money. |
Baal Roo
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
987
|
Posted - 2013.03.24 23:42:00 -
[10] - Quote
Yup, I still fully expect CCP to honor the conditions they set when they sold me the merc pack. If they don't, I expect a full refund. |
|
Mithridates VI
The Southern Legion
456
|
Posted - 2013.03.24 23:42:00 -
[11] - Quote
I'd like to see evidence that any form of aurum purchase other than the merc pack had terms promising redistribution after character reset. |
Three Double-A Batteries
Fraternity of St. Venefice Amarr Empire
85
|
Posted - 2013.03.24 23:46:00 -
[12] - Quote
Frank Devine wrote:When I got the merc pack everything was to be refunded when this game came out if beta, since then I have also spent another 60.00 on AUR and I want it back as promises and I want my 3 day head start that I am suppose to get. Go and do a charge back on your credit card. Problem solved. |
Baal Roo
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
988
|
Posted - 2013.03.24 23:51:00 -
[13] - Quote
Three Double-A Batteries wrote:Frank Devine wrote:When I got the merc pack everything was to be refunded when this game came out if beta, since then I have also spent another 60.00 on AUR and I want it back as promises and I want my 3 day head start that I am suppose to get. Go and do a charge back on your credit card. Problem solved.
I'm not sure, but I think most banks have a time limit on charge backs. Besides, it would be awfully scummy of CCP to make us resort to that sort of thing. |
Frank Devine
ZionTCD Legacy Rising
120
|
Posted - 2013.03.24 23:53:00 -
[14] - Quote
Let me clarify, I don't mean right now, I mean when it comes out of beta, just like I want to see the skills reset. My concern is that they are just going to keep rolling the way they are now kinda like how PlayStation home is still in beta and its been like that for several years. |
Three Double-A Batteries
Fraternity of St. Venefice Amarr Empire
86
|
Posted - 2013.03.24 23:59:00 -
[15] - Quote
Baal Roo wrote:Three Double-A Batteries wrote:Frank Devine wrote:When I got the merc pack everything was to be refunded when this game came out if beta, since then I have also spent another 60.00 on AUR and I want it back as promises and I want my 3 day head start that I am suppose to get. Go and do a charge back on your credit card. Problem solved. I'm not sure, but I think most banks have a time limit on charge backs. Besides, it would be awfully scummy of CCP to make us resort to that sort of thing. People will if they don't stop jerking people around. |
Winscar Shinobi
Better Hide R Die
108
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 00:02:00 -
[16] - Quote
I don't expect them to give a refund, nor give us 3 days exclusive access to the servers once the game moves out of beta.
I think they will use the "substitute items of equal value" clause they have, but then how do you value 3 days? And how do you value in game items?
I mean they can probably just give out BPOs equal to 40,000 aur, but then again when I bought a merc pack, BPOs were a few hundred each, now they are a few thousand. How can you give something of equal value back when you control the prices? They could easily make a 40,000 aur BPO item and give us that.
If anyone ever needs it here is a pic of the terms: http://i1215.photobucket.com/albums/cc518/Malcolm_Nolasco/8920F49B-3EC9-4313-A7C4-97A16380C9BD-926-000000B323B4CA47.jpg
I also am friends with sonys head of digital platforms, he has a copy as well and until the "commercial release" happens he can only monitor the situation. (Can't yell at someone for doing something that hasn't happened yet)
All in all. Calm your **** and wait it out. |
Mithridates VI
The Southern Legion
457
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 00:07:00 -
[17] - Quote
Why do CCP owe anyone three days exclusive access? |
Baal Roo
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
988
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 00:09:00 -
[18] - Quote
Mithridates VI wrote:Why do CCP owe anyone three days exclusive access?
As far as I can tell, they don't. They are contractually obligated to refund us 40,000 AUR at commercial release. |
Drake435
SVER True Blood Unclaimed.
25
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 00:12:00 -
[19] - Quote
I'm confused about this topic. Why should aurum be refunded? You paid for them and you used them. So whats the refund for? |
Mithridates VI
The Southern Legion
462
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 00:12:00 -
[20] - Quote
Baal Roo wrote:Mithridates VI wrote:Why do CCP owe anyone three days exclusive access? As far as I can tell, they don't. They are contractually obligated to refund us 40,000 AUR at commercial release. Yeah, this part, I understand. I'm pretty sure I didn't even buy the merc pack under these terms, but I'm still pretty determined to see this dealt with properly by CCP.
The part I'm not following is "refund all my AUR" and "give me a three day head start", because I don't see that in those terms, nor have I seen evidence that the same terms applied to AUR purchases outside of the merc pack. |
|
Winscar Shinobi
Better Hide R Die
109
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 00:12:00 -
[21] - Quote
Mithridates VI wrote:Why do CCP owe anyone three days exclusive access?
Back when the merc pack first came out "3 days early access to the commercial release" was listed on it. Meaning when the game went full release that merc pack purchasers would get 3 days exclusive access to the game.
Ccp made the promises and now they're backing our of it.
Hell when it was first announced that we wouldn't get anything I made a comment about it and got flamed because people didn't want to not have access to the game for 3 days while us merc packers did. |
Noc Tempre
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
1267
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 00:13:00 -
[22] - Quote
Mithridates VI wrote:Frank Devine wrote:When I got the merc pack everything was to be refunded when this game came out if beta, since then I have also spent another 60.00 on AUR and I want it back as promises and I want my 3 day head start that I am suppose to get. 1: The game is not yet "commercially released" which was the wording used in the merc park terms. 2: Please provide evidence that the AUR you purchased had terms which specified that it would be refunded. 3: What three day head start?
Wrong it is commercially released. That release was Jan 10, 2013. |
Noc Tempre
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
1267
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 00:13:00 -
[23] - Quote
Thog A Kuma wrote:aren't we still in beta?
Beta is a marketing label. But we are released. |
Mithridates VI
The Southern Legion
462
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 00:14:00 -
[24] - Quote
Drake435 wrote:I'm confused about this topic. Why should aurum be refunded? You paid for them and you used them. So whats the refund for? The refund is because the purchase of the merc pack amounts to entering into an agreement which CCP in which they promise to credit accounts with a new merc pack when the game is released. That's all of the relevant information, here. |
Altina McAlterson
TRUE TEA BAGGERS
413
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 00:15:00 -
[25] - Quote
I'm not really sure how I feel about this whole thing, honestly. Just about the only right a customer actually has is they must receive the goods as they were defined at the time of sale. So there's a very good possibility you will be getting free stuff. Be interesting to see how this goes.
Unfortunately even though I purchased one of the offending merc packs I also paid attention to announcements from the DEVS so I knew there wasn't going to be another wipe. It's not like they came to your house and told you about it so it's probably reasonable that someone wouldn't know about. Then again maybe not. Maybe you should pay be paying attention to things said by the DEV's for the game you're testing. Like I said, I really don't know how to feel about this one. |
Mithridates VI
The Southern Legion
462
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 00:15:00 -
[26] - Quote
Noc Tempre wrote:Mithridates VI wrote:Frank Devine wrote:When I got the merc pack everything was to be refunded when this game came out if beta, since then I have also spent another 60.00 on AUR and I want it back as promises and I want my 3 day head start that I am suppose to get. 1: The game is not yet "commercially released" which was the wording used in the merc park terms. 2: Please provide evidence that the AUR you purchased had terms which specified that it would be refunded. 3: What three day head start? Wrong it is commercially released. That release was Jan 10, 2013.
So you say, and I've explaiend in my petition that mixed messages about "commercial release" are part of the issue... but have been assured that "commercially released" is not a label which can be applied to this game.
|
Baal Roo
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
988
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 00:16:00 -
[27] - Quote
Noc Tempre wrote:Mithridates VI wrote:Frank Devine wrote:When I got the merc pack everything was to be refunded when this game came out of beta, since then I have also spent another 60.00 on AUR and I want it back as promises and I want my 3 day head start that I am suppose to get. 1: The game is not yet "commercially released" which was the wording used in the merc park terms. 2: Please provide evidence that the AUR you purchased had terms which specified that it would be refunded. 3: What three day head start? Wrong it is commercially released. That release was Jan 10, 2013.
It can't be both a Beta and commercial release, and multiple CCP representatives have stated in writing, in very clear non-ambigous language, that the game has NOT commercially released. |
Noc Tempre
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
1267
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 00:17:00 -
[28] - Quote
Altina McAlterson wrote:I'm not really sure how I feel about this whole thing, honestly. Just about the only right a customer actually has is they must receive the goods as they were defined at the time of sale. So there's a very good possibility you will be getting free stuff. Be interesting to see how this goes.
Unfortunately even though I purchased one of the offending merc packs I also paid attention to announcements from the DEVS so I knew there wasn't going to be another wipe. It's not like they came to your house and told you about it so it's probably reasonable that someone wouldn't know about. Then again maybe not. Maybe you should pay be paying attention to things said by the DEV's for the game you're testing. Like I said, I really don't know how to feel about this one.
They can't change the terms of sale after the fact. They can change future sales.
Unfortunately they weaseled out of this. The commercial release was Jan 10, 2013. They were sleezy and did not publicly acknowledge this fact but anyone who contact support about this issue got the same answer, consistent with information gleaned from talking to devs. |
Mithridates VI
The Southern Legion
462
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 00:17:00 -
[29] - Quote
Altina McAlterson wrote:announcements from the DEVS so I knew there wasn't going to be another wipe. It's not like they came to your house and told you about it so it's probably reasonable that someone wouldn't know about. Then again maybe not. Maybe you should pay be paying attention to things said by the DEV's for the game you're testing.
My feeling is that no forum announcement, public news bulletin, personal phone call from the devs, etc, overrules the terms of the purchase at the time of purchase.
|
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
589
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 00:17:00 -
[30] - Quote
Frank Devine wrote:Let me clarify, I don't mean right now, I mean when it comes out of beta, just like I want to see the skills reset. My concern is that they are just going to keep rolling the way they are now kinda like how PlayStation home is still in beta and its been like that for several years. At least you're not one of those guys who wants their aurum back, but also wants to keep their Sp. Those guys make me laugh |
|
Noc Tempre
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
1267
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 00:18:00 -
[31] - Quote
Baal Roo wrote:Noc Tempre wrote:Mithridates VI wrote:Frank Devine wrote:When I got the merc pack everything was to be refunded when this game came out of beta, since then I have also spent another 60.00 on AUR and I want it back as promises and I want my 3 day head start that I am suppose to get. 1: The game is not yet "commercially released" which was the wording used in the merc park terms. 2: Please provide evidence that the AUR you purchased had terms which specified that it would be refunded. 3: What three day head start? Wrong it is commercially released. That release was Jan 10, 2013. It can't be both a Beta and commercial release, and multiple CCP representatives have stated in writing, in very clear non-ambigous language, that the game has NOT commercially released.
Yes, it really can be beta and commercially released. Where is your proof we are not? I have my proof we are. |
Mithridates VI
The Southern Legion
462
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 00:18:00 -
[32] - Quote
Noc Tempre wrote:anyone who contact support about this issue got the same answer, consistent with information gleaned from talking to devs.
This is incorrect. I've already explained why.
|
Noc Tempre
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
1267
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 00:20:00 -
[33] - Quote
Mithridates VI wrote:Noc Tempre wrote:anyone who contact support about this issue got the same answer, consistent with information gleaned from talking to devs. This is incorrect. I've already explained why.
Meet me on IRC and we'll trade logs. |
Mithridates VI
The Southern Legion
462
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 00:22:00 -
[34] - Quote
Noc Tempre wrote:Mithridates VI wrote:Noc Tempre wrote:anyone who contact support about this issue got the same answer, consistent with information gleaned from talking to devs. This is incorrect. I've already explained why. Meet me on IRC and we'll trade logs. I'm not going to post petition results verbatim, but I asked a very clear "Are we commercially released, some players have been told we are" and received a direct denial of this as the game's status.
I've also raised issues in the petition that, apparently, Sony have said the game is commercially released, and have stressed that these mixed messages need to be cleared up. |
Noc Tempre
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
1267
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 00:26:00 -
[35] - Quote
Mithridates VI wrote:Noc Tempre wrote:Mithridates VI wrote:Noc Tempre wrote:anyone who contact support about this issue got the same answer, consistent with information gleaned from talking to devs. This is incorrect. I've already explained why. Meet me on IRC and we'll trade logs. I'm not going to post petition results verbatim, but I asked a very clear "Are we commercially released, some players have been told we are" and received a direct denial of this as the game's status. I've also raised issues in the petition that, apparently, Sony have said the game is commercially released, and have stressed that these mixed messages need to be cleared up.
Who gave you this denial? Was it a lead GM or higher? If Sony says it's so, Lead GM says it's so, then I think it's a duck. |
Mithridates VI
The Southern Legion
463
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 00:30:00 -
[36] - Quote
Lol, a lead GM said it was commercially released?
That makes it a little more of a clusterkitten. Here's hoping that the "public comment" I've been told is coming clears things up a little more. The petition I've filed was also focusing on explaining that different responses in different contexts can seem dishonest and is pretty troubling. Hopefully they get that. |
Winscar Shinobi
Better Hide R Die
109
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 00:31:00 -
[37] - Quote
I have to agree with NOC on this. When jan 10th rolled around some devs said "open beta" while others said "commercial release"
Which is why they removed the "get stuff back on commercial release" stuff, they said it no longer applied. |
Altina McAlterson
TRUE TEA BAGGERS
413
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 00:33:00 -
[38] - Quote
This is one of those things where what it is and what it's called are not the same thing. CCP says it was not a commercial release. You can have all the evidence in the world that it was but until you have a ruling from a court of law of a sovereign country with sufficient jurisdiction to try the case your statements that the game is commercially released are wrong.
I'm not saying you are wrong, I'm not saying your evidence is wrong. I'm just saying it isn't a commercial release until CCP or a judge says it is. You're only going to confuse people if you keep this up. |
Noc Tempre
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
1267
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 00:34:00 -
[39] - Quote
Also major flub on my part, commercial release was Jan 22, not Jan 10. |
Noc Tempre
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
1267
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 00:34:00 -
[40] - Quote
Altina McAlterson wrote:This is one of those things where what it is and what it's called are not the same thing. CCP says it was not a commercial release. You can have all the evidence in the world that it was but until you have a ruling from a court of law of sovereign country with sufficient jurisdiction to try the case your statements that the game is commercially released are wrong.
I'm not saying you are wrong, I'm not saying your evidence it wrong. I'm just saying it isn't a commercial release until CCP or a judge says it is. You're only going to confuse people if you keep this up.
CCP did say it was a commercial release though... |
|
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
589
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 00:36:00 -
[41] - Quote
All this talk about whether it's been commercially released and what not... you guys realize that a commercial release just means that it's available to the general public right? So yes, we are in beta, and it is also a commercial release. |
Noc Tempre
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
1267
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 00:37:00 -
[42] - Quote
Sloth9230 wrote:All this talk about whether it's been commercially released and what not... you guys realize that a commercial release just means that it's available to the general public right? So yes, we are in beta, and it is also a commercial release.
True. It's just so sleazy that CCP is trying to hide this fact. Namely because they still want to emphasize it's a beta to shield them from reviews. |
Altina McAlterson
TRUE TEA BAGGERS
413
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 00:41:00 -
[43] - Quote
Noc Tempre wrote:Altina McAlterson wrote:This is one of those things where what it is and what it's called are not the same thing. CCP says it was not a commercial release. You can have all the evidence in the world that it was but until you have a ruling from a court of law of sovereign country with sufficient jurisdiction to try the case your statements that the game is commercially released are wrong.
I'm not saying you are wrong, I'm not saying your evidence it wrong. I'm just saying it isn't a commercial release until CCP or a judge says it is. You're only going to confuse people if you keep this up.
CCP did say it was a commercial release though... No they didn't. Representatives might have said that. But the official statement is there has not been a commercial release.
I'm not trying to argue the merits of your case. Look, when the cops find you sitting on top of a dead body with the murder weapon in one hand and a digital recording of you killing the person in 1080P with surround sound you are still the "alleged murder" until a ruling is reached at your trial.
So your statement that there was a commercial release on such and such date is incorrect because you lack the authority to make any official statements on behalf of CCP. You saying it doesn't change anything and will only further obfuscate the issue for people reading the thread. |
Winscar Shinobi
Better Hide R Die
109
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 00:41:00 -
[44] - Quote
https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=52274
^ there is the thread that ccp said they were removing merc pack refunds. It's a good read. Page 3 is the post from ccp. |
Mithridates VI
The Southern Legion
463
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 00:46:00 -
[45] - Quote
Winscar Shinobi wrote:https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=52274
^ there is the thread that ccp said they were removing merc pack refunds. It's a good read. Page 3 is the post from ccp.
Yeah, and the criticisms of that post remain valid. |
Noc Tempre
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
1267
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 00:47:00 -
[46] - Quote
Altina McAlterson wrote:Noc Tempre wrote:Altina McAlterson wrote:This is one of those things where what it is and what it's called are not the same thing. CCP says it was not a commercial release. You can have all the evidence in the world that it was but until you have a ruling from a court of law of sovereign country with sufficient jurisdiction to try the case your statements that the game is commercially released are wrong.
I'm not saying you are wrong, I'm not saying your evidence it wrong. I'm just saying it isn't a commercial release until CCP or a judge says it is. You're only going to confuse people if you keep this up.
CCP did say it was a commercial release though... No they didn't. Representatives might have said that. But the official statement is there has not been a commercial release. I'm not trying to argue the merits of your case. Look, when the cops find you sitting on top of a dead body with the murder weapon in one hand and a digital recording of you killing the person in 1080P with surround sound you are still the "alleged murder" until a ruling is reached at your trial. So your statement that there was a commercial release on such and such date is incorrect because you lack the authority to make any official statements on behalf of CCP. You saying it doesn't change anything and will only further obfuscate the issue for people reading the thread.
Good. They've purposely been avoiding a straight answer publicly and I demand to know why. The fact remains that Sony, Customer Support, and CCP devs have all independently supported "commercial release" and no public statement has explicitly denied it. |
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
589
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 00:47:00 -
[47] - Quote
Altina McAlterson wrote:Noc Tempre wrote:Altina McAlterson wrote:This is one of those things where what it is and what it's called are not the same thing. CCP says it was not a commercial release. You can have all the evidence in the world that it was but until you have a ruling from a court of law of sovereign country with sufficient jurisdiction to try the case your statements that the game is commercially released are wrong.
I'm not saying you are wrong, I'm not saying your evidence it wrong. I'm just saying it isn't a commercial release until CCP or a judge says it is. You're only going to confuse people if you keep this up.
CCP did say it was a commercial release though... No they didn't. Representatives might have said that. But the official statement is there has not been a commercial release. I'm not trying to argue the merits of your case. Look, when the cops find you sitting on top of a dead body with the murder weapon in one hand and a digital recording of you killing the person in 1080P with surround sound you are still the "alleged murder" until a ruling is reached at your trial. So your statement that there was a commercial release on such and such date is incorrect because you lack the authority to make any official statements on behalf of CCP. You saying it doesn't change anything and will only further obfuscate the issue for people reading the thread. If I stab someone, then I stabbed someone, regardless of what I or others say. This became a commercial release the instant it became available to the general public, regardless of what some court somewhere in who knows where says. |
Altina McAlterson
TRUE TEA BAGGERS
413
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 00:48:00 -
[48] - Quote
Again, until an official statement is released confirming commercial release of the game then there hasn't been a commercial release. Really not that hard of a concept. |
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
589
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 00:52:00 -
[49] - Quote
Altina McAlterson wrote:Again, until an official statement is released confirming commercial release of the game then there hasn't been a commercial release. Really not that hard of a concept. So if I bribe the judge into saying I didn't stab the guy, then I didn't actually stab the guy because it's not "official" right? Sorry, but this is a commercial release, that's a fact. |
Noc Tempre
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
1268
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 00:53:00 -
[50] - Quote
Altina McAlterson wrote:Again, until an official statement is released confirming commercial release of the game then there hasn't been an admittance of commercial release. Really not that hard of a concept.
Fixed for you. Strangely enough, they apparently don't have to tell us when they've fulfilled the terms of the sale. |
|
Altina McAlterson
TRUE TEA BAGGERS
413
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 00:53:00 -
[51] - Quote
Sloth9230 wrote: If I stab someone, then I stabbed someone, regardless of what I or others say. Whether the court finds me guilty or not doesn't change the fact that I am guilty. This became a commercial release the instant it became available to the general public, regardless of what some court somewhere in who knows where says.
You have that completely backwards and you're missing the point entirely. If you are found not guilty you are not punished. It doesn't matter whether you did it or not.
CCP didn't make an official statement that the game was released commercially. So until CCP or a court of law say otherwise they don't have to do anything. That's what I'm getting at. |
Mithridates VI
The Southern Legion
463
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 00:54:00 -
[52] - Quote
Altina McAlterson wrote:Again, until an official statement is released confirming commercial release of the game then there hasn't been a commercial release. Really not that hard of a concept.
That official statement is only the word of a CCP representative. |
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
589
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 00:57:00 -
[53] - Quote
Altina McAlterson wrote:So until CCP or a court of law say otherwise they don't have to do anything. You're ignoring the fact that they did in fact release the game commercially.
|
ImperfectFan514
IMPSwarm Negative-Feedback
105
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 01:02:00 -
[54] - Quote
I want my AUR refunded for ever BS death i've ever had because CCP has been taking pointers for their spawn system from infinity ward, and have some how found a way to make even worse spawns than the ones found in MW3. |
Three Double-A Batteries
Fraternity of St. Venefice Amarr Empire
86
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 01:05:00 -
[55] - Quote
Noc Tempre wrote:Sloth9230 wrote:All this talk about whether it's been commercially released and what not... you guys realize that a commercial release just means that it's available to the general public right? So yes, we are in beta, and it is also a commercial release. True. It's just so sleazy that CCP is trying to hide this fact. Namely because they still want to emphasize it's a beta to shield them from reviews. You've got it in one.
Weasel words from CCP to protect themselves from reviews.
So are we in a beta or are we not? How can CCP take money for a product and not call it a commercial release?
How can still be internally reviewing their own T&Cs unless it is just to try to find legal loopholes to avoid doing what they stated?
Will they do what they committed to?
All of this is beginning to get the whiff or dodgy behaviour to be honest. |
Altina McAlterson
TRUE TEA BAGGERS
413
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 01:06:00 -
[56] - Quote
I swear to god are you all f*cking with me? Is this really that hard of a concept?
You can point to this and that all damn day and argue about whether or not you can bribe a judge to unstab somebody but the simple fact is that until you take this shite to trial and get a signed court order then the game is in whatever stage CCP says it is and they don't have to do a damn thing if they don't want to do it. |
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
589
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 01:09:00 -
[57] - Quote
Altina McAlterson wrote:I swear to god are you all f*cking with me? Is this really that hard of a concept?
You can point to this and that all damn day and argue about whether or not you can bribe a judge to unstab somebody but the simple fact is that until you take this shite to trial and get a signed court order then the game is in whatever stage CCP says it is and they don't have to do a damn thing if they don't want to do it. This isn't about the law, this is about people's trust in CCP.
Yes, "they don't have to do anything", but it would be nice if they kept their word. All they have to do is admit that this is a Commercial Release, that's all.
If I tell you I'm going to give you 5$, do I have to give them to you? No, but would you trust me if I didn't? |
Altina McAlterson
TRUE TEA BAGGERS
413
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 01:13:00 -
[58] - Quote
Sloth9230 wrote:Altina McAlterson wrote:I swear to god are you all f*cking with me? Is this really that hard of a concept?
You can point to this and that all damn day and argue about whether or not you can bribe a judge to unstab somebody but the simple fact is that until you take this shite to trial and get a signed court order then the game is in whatever stage CCP says it is and they don't have to do a damn thing if they don't want to do it. This isn't about the law, this is about people's trust in CCP. Yes, "they don't have to do anything", but it would be nice if they kept their word. All they have to do is admit that this is a Commercial Release, that's all. If I tell you I'm going to give you 5$, do I have to give them to you? No, but would you trust me if I didn't? No, actually this is about Noc making statements that are going to do nothing but confuse people. |
Maken Tosch
Planetary Response Organisation Test Friends Please Ignore
1751
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 01:17:00 -
[59] - Quote
You know what, threads like this are getting annoying. CCP, once this game is "commercially released", just refund the AUR and be done with it so that we won't have to deal with this kitten anymore. |
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
589
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 01:17:00 -
[60] - Quote
Altina McAlterson wrote: No, actually this is about Noc making statements that are going to do nothing but confuse people.
But what he says is true, whether CCP admits to it or not. |
|
Noc Tempre
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
1268
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 01:17:00 -
[61] - Quote
Altina McAlterson wrote:Sloth9230 wrote:Altina McAlterson wrote:I swear to god are you all f*cking with me? Is this really that hard of a concept?
You can point to this and that all damn day and argue about whether or not you can bribe a judge to unstab somebody but the simple fact is that until you take this shite to trial and get a signed court order then the game is in whatever stage CCP says it is and they don't have to do a damn thing if they don't want to do it. This isn't about the law, this is about people's trust in CCP. Yes, "they don't have to do anything", but it would be nice if they kept their word. All they have to do is admit that this is a Commercial Release, that's all. If I tell you I'm going to give you 5$, do I have to give them to you? No, but would you trust me if I didn't? No, actually this is about Noc making statements that are going to do nothing but confuse people.
If anyone is confused it is CCP's fault. They went into commercial release without making a clear, concise public announcement. Why they chose to do that is a debate in-of-itself. |
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
589
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 01:18:00 -
[62] - Quote
Maken Tosch wrote:You know what, threads like this are getting annoying. CCP, once this game is "commercially released", just refund the AUR and be done with it so that we won't have to deal with this kitten anymore. If it doesn't come with a skill reset then no, that would be giving away free boosters.
Buy your boosters now everybody, 2 for the price of 1! |
Mithridates VI
The Southern Legion
465
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 01:23:00 -
[63] - Quote
Altina McAlterson wrote:CCP didn't make an official statement that the game was released commercially. So until CCP or a court of law say otherwise they don't have to do anything. That's what I'm getting at.
Now I'm not saying "CCP can be legally compelled to redistribute merc pack contents".
What I'm saying is: If CCP made an agreement with their players to redistribute the merc pack contents on commercial release AND appear to internally view their game to be commercially released AND have communicated this to Sony AND have representatives who are willing to communicate this information with the playerbase... then they are obliged to give some acknowledgement of this. It is my feeling that this acknowledgement should take the form of the promised material rewards or a denial of the commercial release.
They're contractually and morally obliged, not to mention the fact that it's in their best interests when it comes to PR... which is different from being legally compelled. Your argument seems to be "if they want to be dishonest about it, they have the power and you can't do anything about it". A thread expressing dissatisfaction with this viewpoint IS doing something about it.
Altina McAlterson wrote:I just don't want people getting confused and thinking they're entitled to this or that or whatever. If they bought the merc pack under the original terms, they're entitled to have it credited to their account on commercial release, whether CCP acknowledge and honour that or not. |
Mithridates VI
The Southern Legion
466
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 01:29:00 -
[64] - Quote
And if CCP view commercial release to have already occurred at the time of a previous reset, they need to make some official mention of this fact and train their customer response/GM team in communicating this to players. |
Maken Tosch
Planetary Response Organisation Test Friends Please Ignore
1751
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 01:34:00 -
[65] - Quote
Sloth9230 wrote:Maken Tosch wrote:You know what, threads like this are getting annoying. CCP, once this game is "commercially released", just refund the AUR and be done with it so that we won't have to deal with this kitten anymore. If it doesn't come with a skill reset then no, that would be giving away free boosters. Buy your boosters now everybody, 2 for the price of 1!
Tough luck then. CCP said there will be no SP resets. However, I believe CCP Frame mentioned the possibility of an SP reimbursement but it's still an idea on the table. |
Gunner Nightingale
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
386
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 01:36:00 -
[66] - Quote
Here is the conundrum
*IMPORTANT NOTICE: During beta periods, CCP may need to reset characters, skills and other items included in the DUST 514-« GameStop Mercenary Pack. DUST 514-« GameStop Mercenary Pack will be credited in full to your in-game DUST 514-« account after each character reset and for the commercial release. CCP cannot guarantee all items will be identical and reserves the right to substitute items of similar value. No other form of refund is permitted.
Purchase or use of this item is subject to the PlayStation-«Network Terms of Service and User Agreement and this item's use restrictions. This item has been sublicensed to you by Sony Computer Entertainment America. One-time license fee for downloads to up to 2 console systems that are associated with the purchasing account. Please refer to the DUST 514-« EULA for full terms and conditions on deletion of characters and in-game items upon completion of the beta phase.
-¬2012 CCP hf. All rights reserved. 'CCP', 'DUST 514' and 'EVE Online' are trademarks or registered trademarks of CCP hf in the United States and other jurisdictions. The ESRB ratings icon is a registered trademark of the Entertainment Software Association. All other trademarks and trade names are the properties of their respective owners.
PlayStation-«Move features require PlayStation-«Move motion controller and PlayStation-«Eye (sold separately).
Pulled that from gamestop.com regarding their sale of the Merc pack from today. If the terms clearly state i am to get a refund of my AURUM to my character account during each reset and for the commercial release. Those who say we are in commercial release would argue that our AURUM was refunded to us during the wipe prior to open beta and that open beta was commercial release and should have gotten a AURUM refund back to character for COMMERCIAL RELEASE.
The conundrum, CCP has clearly laid the line that there will be no more SP resets. https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=619126#post619126
However for everyone maintaining this is still a Beta and not Commercial release the sticky reality is then CCP needs to refund us our AURUM and to do that without SP reset (as they maintain they WILL NOT DO) means lots more SP boosters bought and a wider SP gap.
So either 1/22/13 was commercial release(beta-work in progress is a tagline) and CCP has fullfilled their obligations of the commericial release language was met(though debatable still) or it is not commercial release and CCP finds themselves in a curious pickle..
/thread. |
Maken Tosch
Planetary Response Organisation Test Friends Please Ignore
1751
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 01:36:00 -
[67] - Quote
Mithridates VI wrote:And if CCP view commercial release to have already occurred at the time of a previous reset, they need to make some official mention of this fact and train their customer response/GM team in communicating this to players.
This I agree. |
Mithridates VI
The Southern Legion
467
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 01:38:00 -
[68] - Quote
I imagine that the fact that CCP have both stated "no SP resets" and "you will be credited these items again on commercial release" may be in some part responsible for the trouble they're having in addressing this issue.
I just wish they would acknowledge that, if it's the case. I want them to say, "hey, this is a difficult situation and we're trying to find a way through it which doesn't needlessly disadvantage the players, while still keeping true to the promises we made them, bear with us as we do what we can to resolve this".
Instead, we are getting conflicting advice and boilerplate responses to put petitions querying the matter on hold.
EDIT: Or pretty much what Gunner said. |
Maken Tosch
Planetary Response Organisation Test Friends Please Ignore
1751
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 01:42:00 -
[69] - Quote
Gunner Nightingale wrote:Here is the conundrum *IMPORTANT NOTICE: During beta periods, CCP may need to reset characters, skills and other items included in the DUST 514-« GameStop Mercenary Pack. DUST 514-« GameStop Mercenary Pack will be credited in full to your in-game DUST 514-« account after each character reset and for the commercial release. CCP cannot guarantee all items will be identical and reserves the right to substitute items of similar value. No other form of refund is permitted. Purchase or use of this item is subject to the PlayStation-«Network Terms of Service and User Agreement and this item's use restrictions. This item has been sublicensed to you by Sony Computer Entertainment America. One-time license fee for downloads to up to 2 console systems that are associated with the purchasing account. Please refer to the DUST 514-« EULA for full terms and conditions on deletion of characters and in-game items upon completion of the beta phase. -¬2012 CCP hf. All rights reserved. 'CCP', 'DUST 514' and 'EVE Online' are trademarks or registered trademarks of CCP hf in the United States and other jurisdictions. The ESRB ratings icon is a registered trademark of the Entertainment Software Association. All other trademarks and trade names are the properties of their respective owners. PlayStation-«Move features require PlayStation-«Move motion controller and PlayStation-«Eye (sold separately). Pulled that from gamestop.com regarding their sale of the Merc pack from today. If the terms clearly state i am to get a refund of my AURUM to my character account during each reset and for the commercial release. Those who say we are in commercial release would argue that our AURUM was refunded to us during the wipe prior to open beta and that open beta was commercial release and should have gotten a AURUM refund back to character for COMMERCIAL RELEASE. The conundrum, CCP has clearly laid the line that there will be no more SP resets. https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=619126#post619126However for everyone maintaining this is still a Beta and not Commercial release the sticky reality is then CCP needs to refund us our AURUM and to do that without SP reset (as they maintain they WILL NOT DO) means lots more SP boosters bought and a wider SP gap. So either 1/22/13 was commercial release(beta-work in progress is a tagline) and CCP has fullfilled their obligations of the commericial release language was met(though debatable still) or it is not commercial release and CCP finds themselves in a curious pickle.. /thread.
Very logical reply. Now that someone put it this way, I can see now how this is a very sticky situation. But CCP didn't dismiss the idea of an SP reimbursement and to be honest there are probably not that many players who bought the merc packs since open beta. So reimbursing the AUR spent back to their characters may not be such a big deal since Dust is just getting started. |
Gunner Nightingale
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
386
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 01:54:00 -
[70] - Quote
Maken Tosch wrote:[quote=Gunner Nightingale]Here is the conundrum
Very logical reply. Now that someone put it this way, I can see now how this is a very sticky situation. But CCP didn't dismiss the idea of an SP reimbursement and to be honest there are probably not that many players who bought the merc packs since open beta. So reimbursing the AUR spent back to their characters may not be such a big deal since Dust is just getting started.
Yes but the SP reimbursement language refers more to getting back SP back for things like dropsuits or other skill sets where they introduce new content into similar to what they do EVE side.
Even then still the issue becomes it creates a scenario where every individual that has since closed beta to date and more so all merc pack purchases made up to the date of "comercial release" would get aurum refunded and will have reaped the benefits of AURUM bought boosters twice if there isnt a requisite SP wipe to balance it.
While this would be an awesome "beta tester reward" (which if the marketing dept is smart will spin this as and save face) it creates it still comes at some sort of cost to the player base because they are getting double their moneys worth out of a single paid item. |
|
Rasatsu
Much Crying Old Experts
552
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 02:32:00 -
[71] - Quote
This thread...
Fine, I support the position of the guys who want refunded the AUR and merc pack items on commercial release. They should also get all their salvage and SP reset.
The rest of us will keep our characters as-is. |
Mithridates VI
The Southern Legion
467
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 02:35:00 -
[72] - Quote
Rasatsu wrote:This thread...
Fine, I support the position of the guys who want refunded the AUR and merc pack items on commercial release. They should also get all their salvage and SP reset.
The rest of us will keep our characters as-is. So your position is basically that people who want CCP to honour a purchase agreement that they made with those players, should be penalised for that? |
Rasatsu
Much Crying Old Experts
552
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 02:37:00 -
[73] - Quote
Mithridates VI wrote:Rasatsu wrote:This thread...
Fine, I support the position of the guys who want refunded the AUR and merc pack items on commercial release. They should also get all their salvage and SP reset.
The rest of us will keep our characters as-is. So your position is basically that people who want CCP to honour a purchase agreement that they made with those players, should be penalised for that? No, it's not a penalty, it's exactly what you asked for.
The refund was intended for the reset on commercial release and CCP decided to change the timing of the reset. Why would you think you'd get to skip the reset and just have the refund?
Be careful what you ask for, you might actually get it. |
Maken Tosch
Planetary Response Organisation Test Friends Please Ignore
1756
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 02:37:00 -
[74] - Quote
Gunner Nightingale wrote:Maken Tosch wrote:[quote=Gunner Nightingale]Here is the conundrum
Very logical reply. Now that someone put it this way, I can see now how this is a very sticky situation. But CCP didn't dismiss the idea of an SP reimbursement and to be honest there are probably not that many players who bought the merc packs since open beta. So reimbursing the AUR spent back to their characters may not be such a big deal since Dust is just getting started. Yes but the SP reimbursement language refers more to getting back SP back for things like dropsuits or other skill sets where they introduce new content into similar to what they do EVE side. Even then still the issue becomes it creates a scenario where every individual that has since closed beta to date and more so all merc pack purchases made up to the date of "comercial release" would get aurum refunded and will have reaped the benefits of AURUM bought boosters twice if there isnt a requisite SP wipe to balance it. While this would be an awesome "beta tester reward" (which if the marketing dept is smart will spin this as and save face) it creates it still comes at some sort of cost to the player base because they are getting double their moneys worth out of a single paid item.
In that case, take away the AUR-bought BPOs as well but let us keep the event-related items like the 'Quafe' suits and 'skinweaves'. |
Maken Tosch
Planetary Response Organisation Test Friends Please Ignore
1757
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 02:39:00 -
[75] - Quote
Rasatsu wrote:This thread...
Fine, I support the position of the guys who want refunded the AUR and merc pack items on commercial release. They should also get all their salvage and SP reset.
The rest of us will keep our characters as-is.
1. Salvage has nothing to do with AUR. 2. CCP already confirmed there will be no more SP resets. But again, SP reimbursements are still an idea being considered. |
Mithridates VI
The Southern Legion
467
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 02:40:00 -
[76] - Quote
Rasatsu wrote:Mithridates VI wrote:Rasatsu wrote:This thread...
Fine, I support the position of the guys who want refunded the AUR and merc pack items on commercial release. They should also get all their salvage and SP reset.
The rest of us will keep our characters as-is. So your position is basically that people who want CCP to honour a purchase agreement that they made with those players, should be penalised for that? No, it's not a penalty, it's exactly what you asked for. The refund was intended for the reset on commercial release and CCP decided to change the timing of the reset. Why would you think you'd get to skip the reset and just have the refund? Be careful what you ask for, you might actually get it.
It's a penalty because it disadvantages players who bought the merc pack. The product CCP sold to them was "a merc pack and also a merc pack on resets and on commercial release".
Honouring that agreement should have no bearing on their SP in comparison to that of their peers.
Your description of what the refund was intended for is speculation and stating that CCP decided to change the terms should have no impact on those who entered into the agreement with CCP before those terms were changed. |
Rasatsu
Much Crying Old Experts
552
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 02:45:00 -
[77] - Quote
Maken Tosch wrote:Rasatsu wrote:This thread...
Fine, I support the position of the guys who want refunded the AUR and merc pack items on commercial release. They should also get all their salvage and SP reset.
The rest of us will keep our characters as-is. 1. Salvage has nothing to do with AUR. 2. CCP already confirmed there will be no more SP resets. But again, SP reimbursements are still an idea being considered. Salvage has everything to do with AUR in that AUR has everything to do with a character reset. Why should anything be passed on through a character reset?
You get your AUR / merc items plus event items, the rest is reset.
That CCP won't reset again was a promise made after the commercial release part of the merc pack, and we all know commercial release means reset of the characters (hence the clause). I think it's going to require some twisting of the term 'commercial release', but I'm sure CCP can be flexible enough to give players who want refund their own personal 'commercial release'.
Problem solved. |
Sylvana Nightwind
Expert Intervention Caldari State
139
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 02:47:00 -
[78] - Quote
Mithridates VI wrote:Originally, the Mercenary Pack stated: IMPORTANT NOTICE: During beta periods, CCP may need to reset characters, skills and other items included in the DUST 514-« Mercenary Pack. DUST 514-« Mercenary Pack will be credited in full to your in-game DUST 514-« account after each character reset and for the commercial release. CCP cannot guarantee all items will be identical and reserves the right to substitute items of similar value. No other form of refund is permitted.
Merc pack does not say that anymore. You got your AUR reset in Chromosome build. |
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
589
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 02:48:00 -
[79] - Quote
Mithridates VI wrote:Rasatsu wrote:Mithridates VI wrote:Rasatsu wrote:This thread...
Fine, I support the position of the guys who want refunded the AUR and merc pack items on commercial release. They should also get all their salvage and SP reset.
The rest of us will keep our characters as-is. So your position is basically that people who want CCP to honour a purchase agreement that they made with those players, should be penalised for that? No, it's not a penalty, it's exactly what you asked for. The refund was intended for the reset on commercial release and CCP decided to change the timing of the reset. Why would you think you'd get to skip the reset and just have the refund? Be careful what you ask for, you might actually get it. It's a penalty because it disadvantages players who bought the merc pack. The product CCP sold to them was "a merc pack and also a merc pack on resets and on commercial release". Honouring that agreement should have no bearing on their SP in comparison to that of their peers. Your description of what the refund was intended for is speculation and stating that CCP decided to change the terms should have no impact on those who entered into the agreement with CCP before those terms were changed. He's treating Open Beta as a commercial release, which he's right to do, in which case then CCP has already honored their part of the agreement. They just have to admit that this is a commercial release now.... Honestly, all this confusion stems from CCP not wanting to admit that this is a CR. |
lowratehitman
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
417
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 02:48:00 -
[80] - Quote
I always wonder when I see these posts like this why "Big Brother" just does not come out from the shadows and settle this stuff straight. I am sure SOMEBODY is watching and reading every thread..... |
|
Mithridates VI
The Southern Legion
467
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 02:51:00 -
[81] - Quote
Sylvana Nightwind wrote:Mithridates VI wrote:Originally, the Mercenary Pack stated: IMPORTANT NOTICE: During beta periods, CCP may need to reset characters, skills and other items included in the DUST 514-« Mercenary Pack. DUST 514-« Mercenary Pack will be credited in full to your in-game DUST 514-« account after each character reset and for the commercial release. CCP cannot guarantee all items will be identical and reserves the right to substitute items of similar value. No other form of refund is permitted.
Merc pack does not say that anymore. You got your AUR reset in Chromosome build.
1. I understand that the merc pack doesn't say that anymore. That's why I opened with "Originally, the Mercenary Pack stated". 2. I didn't get any AUR reset as I'm personally unaffected by this issue. 3. The AUR reset in Chromosome build could easily be the result of either a: reset due to character reset or b: reset due to commercial release. That CCP (sometimes) denies that the game is commercially released suggests the former, leaving a future merc pack redistribution required on commercial release, as per the terms of this agreement. |
Mithridates VI
The Southern Legion
467
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 02:53:00 -
[82] - Quote
Sloth9230 wrote: He's treating Open Beta as a commercial release, which he's right to do, in which case then CCP has already honored their part of the agreement. They just have to admit that this is a commercial release now.... Honestly, all this confusion stems from CCP not wanting to admit that this is a CR.
Yeah, if the game is commercially released, the terms of the original merc pack sales are satisfied... but the denial that we are commercially released makes things troublesome. |
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
589
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 02:56:00 -
[83] - Quote
Mithridates VI wrote: 3. The AUR reset in Chromosome build could easily be the result of either a: reset due to character reset or b: reset due to commercial release. That CCP (sometimes) denies that the game is commercially released suggests the former, leaving a future merc pack redistribution required on commercial release, as per the terms of this agreement.
Nope, Open Beta is a commercial release, or is the game not available to the General public? Because that's what a commercial release is, not when CCP decides it is. |
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
589
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 02:57:00 -
[84] - Quote
Mithridates VI wrote:Sloth9230 wrote: He's treating Open Beta as a commercial release, which he's right to do, in which case then CCP has already honored their part of the agreement. They just have to admit that this is a commercial release now.... Honestly, all this confusion stems from CCP not wanting to admit that this is a CR.
Yeah, if the game is commercially released, the terms of the original merc pack sales are satisfied... but the denial that we are commercially released makes things troublesome. Again, I can stab a guy and deny I stabbed him, that doesn't mean I didn't stab him. |
Mithridates VI
The Southern Legion
467
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 03:01:00 -
[85] - Quote
Sloth9230 wrote:Open Beta is a commercial release, or is the game not available to the General public? Because that's what a commercial release is, not when CCP decides it is.
Can you link me to where "commercial release" has a universally agreed upon definition in legal agreements? Otherwise, I think someone writing a contract can define things however they choose... CCP just failed to define it at all.
|
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
589
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 03:10:00 -
[86] - Quote
Mithridates VI wrote: Can you link me to where "commercial release" has a universally agreed upon definition in legal agreements?
Nope, I couldn't find a legal definition, but relying on a loophole is a pretty sketchy thing to do. They could very well claim CR 7 years from now if that's the case.
Generally speaking though, software is considered "commercially" released once it's available to the public. |
Mithridates VI
The Southern Legion
467
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 03:13:00 -
[87] - Quote
Sloth9230 wrote:Mithridates VI wrote: Can you link me to where "commercial release" has a universally agreed upon definition in legal agreements?
Nope, I couldn't find a legal definition, but relying on a loophole is a pretty sketchy thing to do. They could very well claim CR 7 years from now if that's the case. Generally speaking though, software is considered "commercially" released once it's available to the public.
I'm not going to touch that, because with the time I have to invest in this conversation, all I've got is a wiki link which says otherwise.
Your description of "commercial release" is not my experience with the concept.
EDIT: And they could claim commercial release seven years from now. That's how open beta works. |
Gunner Nightingale
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
387
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 03:14:00 -
[88] - Quote
Sylvana Nightwind wrote:Mithridates VI wrote:Originally, the Mercenary Pack stated: IMPORTANT NOTICE: During beta periods, CCP may need to reset characters, skills and other items included in the DUST 514-« Mercenary Pack. DUST 514-« Mercenary Pack will be credited in full to your in-game DUST 514-« account after each character reset and for the commercial release. CCP cannot guarantee all items will be identical and reserves the right to substitute items of similar value. No other form of refund is permitted.
Merc pack does not say that anymore. You got your AUR reset in Chromosome build.
I wont post the actual wording again just look a few posts up. And here is the link the terms are still the same at Gamestop so what they're are selling an item under two DIFFERENT set of terms and conditions at the same time. That only makes it worse.
http://www.gamestop.com/ps3/dlc/dust-514-gamestop-mercenary-pack/106107 |
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
589
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 03:21:00 -
[89] - Quote
Mithridates VI wrote:Sloth9230 wrote:Mithridates VI wrote: Can you link me to where "commercial release" has a universally agreed upon definition in legal agreements?
Nope, I couldn't find a legal definition, but relying on a loophole is a pretty sketchy thing to do. They could very well claim CR 7 years from now if that's the case. Generally speaking though, software is considered "commercially" released once it's available to the public. I'm not going to touch that, because with the time I have to invest in this conversation, all I've got is a wiki link which says otherwise. Your description of "commercial release" is not my experience with the concept. EDIT: And they could claim commercial release seven years from now. That's how open beta works. Commercial Release, also known as GA.
Look at the Open Beta part, notice how it says "potential consumers", yeah, at this point you are a no longer a "potential" consumer, you/we are consumers. |
Mithridates VI
The Southern Legion
467
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 03:25:00 -
[90] - Quote
The game's release status is at the discretion of the people behind it.
Monetising a beta doesn't require a change of release status. And, again, CCP are not following a typical release schedule. |
|
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
589
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 03:30:00 -
[91] - Quote
CCP can say w/e they want, but there will be no character resets, therefore to me and a lot of other people this game is considered "live" or "commercially released".
If CCP does Refund Aurum, then it should exclude any that was spent on boosters.
Edit: It may be an incomplete product, but it's an incomplete product that they are selling. |
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
589
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 03:54:00 -
[92] - Quote
Something just occurred to me...
Say Dust 514 never goes into commercial release, CCP decides to stay in beta indefinitely. So with no character resets, and no commercial release, does that mean that CCP doesn't ever have to refund Aurum?
GG CCP, seriously though, somebody call a lawyer lol |
Dr Debo Galaxy
GunFall Mobilization Covert Intervention
277
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 03:57:00 -
[93] - Quote
The way I see it would be like me saying. I will give you a million dollars on the best day of my life. Then i get married, have kids, get promotions at work, win awards,etc. The catch here is I determine the best day of my life not you. You could say the day your kid was born was the best day of your life but if I don't say it is, then it is not. They determine when the "commercial release" is not us. We can say we determine it but we don't/ And according to the laws in america if you are proven innocent then you are innocent. Look at Cassie Anthony, everyone believe she is guilty, but a jury of her peers said the state did not give sufficiant enough evidence to show she killed her daughter. So we must respect that. If we do not then the whole judicial system comes into question and we are back at mob mentality and we would just go around saying people are guilty without a trial, because you believe they are. Then what if you didn't do something wrong but the public thinks you did and you are sent to jail or the chair for something you didn't do. And it would go on and on and on.
Also we are arguing something that may not even happen. Come june they could say it's full release time and refund all of our aur. and reset the skills. We don't know. They may they may not. we will just have to see. |
Baal Roo
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
990
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 04:13:00 -
[94] - Quote
Rasatsu wrote:Mithridates VI wrote:Rasatsu wrote:This thread...
Fine, I support the position of the guys who want refunded the AUR and merc pack items on commercial release. They should also get all their salvage and SP reset.
The rest of us will keep our characters as-is. So your position is basically that people who want CCP to honour a purchase agreement that they made with those players, should be penalised for that? No, it's not a penalty, it's exactly what you asked for. The refund was intended for the reset on commercial release and CCP decided to change the timing of the reset. Why would you think you'd get to skip the reset and just have the refund? Be careful what you ask for, you might actually get it.
this would be a disgusting way to approach this and I would never touch another CCP product again if they went this route. CCP needs to honor the agreement they made with their paying customers without intentionally screwing us out of spite. |
Baal Roo
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
990
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 04:16:00 -
[95] - Quote
Sloth9230 wrote:Mithridates VI wrote: 3. The AUR reset in Chromosome build could easily be the result of either a: reset due to character reset or b: reset due to commercial release. That CCP (sometimes) denies that the game is commercially released suggests the former, leaving a future merc pack redistribution required on commercial release, as per the terms of this agreement.
Nope, Open Beta is a commercial release, or is the game not available to the General public? Because that's what a commercial release is, not when CCP decides it is.
CCP have stated, in writing, that we are not yet in commercial release. Look back through the dev posts to around the time the other thread about this (linked a page or two back) and see for yourself if you want. In fact, they were actually quite rude and dismissive about the idea that anyone would even consider the beta "commercial release". |
Aighun
Zumari Force Projection Caldari State
680
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 04:19:00 -
[96] - Quote
Frank Devine wrote:Let me clarify, I don't mean right now, I mean when it comes out of beta, just like I want to see the skills reset. My concern is that they are just going to keep rolling the way they are now kinda like how PlayStation home is still in beta and its been like that for several years.
I think you are finally getting to understand DUST 514. Seems about likely this is what will happen. You may get something back for the merc pack if the beta ever does end. But will the beta ever end? |
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
591
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 04:21:00 -
[97] - Quote
Baal Roo wrote:
CCP have stated, in writing, that we are not yet in commercial release. Look back through the dev posts to around the time the other thread about this (linked a page or two back) and see for yourself if you want. In fact, they were actually quite rude and dismissive about the idea that anyone would even consider the beta "commercial release".
Like I said, I could deny kicking a puppy, but if you see me do it...
You get to keep your SP, and I'm assuming all your gear, and anyone with a PS3 and an internet connection can download this game. Someone explain to me how this game isn't released, because CCP said so doesn't count. |
Maken Tosch
Planetary Response Organisation Test Friends Please Ignore
1759
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 04:21:00 -
[98] - Quote
Rasatsu wrote:Maken Tosch wrote:Rasatsu wrote:This thread...
Fine, I support the position of the guys who want refunded the AUR and merc pack items on commercial release. They should also get all their salvage and SP reset.
The rest of us will keep our characters as-is. 1. Salvage has nothing to do with AUR. 2. CCP already confirmed there will be no more SP resets. But again, SP reimbursements are still an idea being considered. Salvage has everything to do with AUR in that AUR has everything to do with a character reset.
How so? Have you received any AUR items via the salvage mechanic? If so, which ones? |
Aighun
Zumari Force Projection Caldari State
680
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 04:26:00 -
[99] - Quote
Gunner Nightingale wrote:Sylvana Nightwind wrote:Mithridates VI wrote:Originally, the Mercenary Pack stated: IMPORTANT NOTICE: During beta periods, CCP may need to reset characters, skills and other items included in the DUST 514-« Mercenary Pack. DUST 514-« Mercenary Pack will be credited in full to your in-game DUST 514-« account after each character reset and for the commercial release. CCP cannot guarantee all items will be identical and reserves the right to substitute items of similar value. No other form of refund is permitted.
Merc pack does not say that anymore. You got your AUR reset in Chromosome build. I wont post the actual wording again just look a few posts up. And here is the link the terms are still the same at Gamestop so what they're are selling an item under two DIFFERENT set of terms and conditions at the same time. That only makes it worse. http://www.gamestop.com/ps3/dlc/dust-514-gamestop-mercenary-pack/106107
Gamestop merc pack is Gamestop Mercenary Pack. Different item. But if you buy that and the game ever goes to commercial release you should get the items back, or items of similar value. Just like it says. |
XeroTheBigBoss
Pink Fluffy Bounty Hunterz
62
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 04:32:00 -
[100] - Quote
My Corp has helped me seen this is a BETA. Until the main person in charge comes out and says we are officially released! It will be BETA. There is no time limit on BETA. The game can forever call itself BETA if it is free and not charging they have NO obligation to commercial release. They can keep grabbing money from people willing to buy AUR, they have no obligation to give nothing back until they are ready to do so IF they are ever ready to do so. THE END. |
|
Winscar Shinobi
Better Hide R Die
109
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 05:03:00 -
[101] - Quote
Yeah ccp messed up big time on this one.
They haven't said anything about it because they probably don't know what to say. Only time will tell. But as it stands on commercial release (whenever that is) they have to refund all merc packs bought before jan 22nd and currently any merc packs bought from GameStop.
Note**** the last reset was January 10th 2013, 12 days before the open beta, on January 22nd 2013. Meaning if they consider open beta commercial release then they did not fulfill the refund on commercial release promise stated in the merc pack terms. Something to think about.
Note**** also know that laws in the USA mandate that when you purchase an item with terms you agree to that set of terms, if the terms change at a later date you are not obligated to them, you are obligated to the terms at time of purchase. |
Gunner Nightingale
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
391
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 05:13:00 -
[102] - Quote
Aighun wrote:Gunner Nightingale wrote:Sylvana Nightwind wrote:Mithridates VI wrote:Originally, the Mercenary Pack stated: IMPORTANT NOTICE: During beta periods, CCP may need to reset characters, skills and other items included in the DUST 514-« Mercenary Pack. DUST 514-« Mercenary Pack will be credited in full to your in-game DUST 514-« account after each character reset and for the commercial release. CCP cannot guarantee all items will be identical and reserves the right to substitute items of similar value. No other form of refund is permitted.
Merc pack does not say that anymore. You got your AUR reset in Chromosome build. I wont post the actual wording again just look a few posts up. And here is the link the terms are still the same at Gamestop so what they're are selling an item under two DIFFERENT set of terms and conditions at the same time. That only makes it worse. http://www.gamestop.com/ps3/dlc/dust-514-gamestop-mercenary-pack/106107 Gamestop merc pack is Gamestop Mercenary Pack. Different item. But if you buy that and the game ever goes to commercial release you should get the items back, or items of similar value. Just like it says.
So you agree they are operating under TWO sets of T&A for the same product(oh and giving me two toxins instead of one is not enough to warrant a separate product and putting the "gamestop" preceding it is simply indicating the vendor) so again this only makes the situation worse.
Still all of these merc packs are subject to EULA and whatever language is in there can be argued to supercede the "contract" that is being agreed upon at point of purchase. |
Three Double-A Batteries
Fraternity of St. Venefice Amarr Empire
89
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 06:04:00 -
[103] - Quote
Winscar Shinobi wrote:Yeah ccp messed up big time on this one.
They haven't said anything about it because they probably don't know what to say. You said it.
I'll bet it's solely in the hands of lawyers and spin doctors. You will be screwed over or they would have fixed it by now.
|
Rasatsu
Much Crying Old Experts
553
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 06:33:00 -
[104] - Quote
Winscar Shinobi wrote:Yeah ccp messed up big time on this one.
They haven't said anything about it because they probably don't know what to say. Only time will tell. But as it stands on commercial release (whenever that is) they have to refund all merc packs bought before jan 22nd and currently any merc packs bought from GameStop. No, they don't need to refund my merc pack, in fact I insist they don't.
Since I don't want to have all my SP reset I'll just let them keep what I've spent, while the rest of you whiners can go insist having your characters' SP reset for the refund. |
usrevenge2
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
74
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 06:36:00 -
[105] - Quote
huh? though it's "open beta" the game is basically out now, just with many more updates and patches to come. |
Mithridates VI
The Southern Legion
481
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 06:38:00 -
[106] - Quote
Rasatsu wrote:Winscar Shinobi wrote:Yeah ccp messed up big time on this one.
They haven't said anything about it because they probably don't know what to say. Only time will tell. But as it stands on commercial release (whenever that is) they have to refund all merc packs bought before jan 22nd and currently any merc packs bought from GameStop. No, they don't need to refund my merc pack, in fact I insist they don't. Since I don't want to have all my SP reset I'll just let them keep what I've spent, while the rest of you whiners can go insist having your characters' SP reset for the refund.
Working on your earlier assumption that an AUR refund requires a character reset, I suppose that makes sense. |
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
593
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 06:50:00 -
[107] - Quote
Mithridates VI wrote:Rasatsu wrote:Winscar Shinobi wrote:Yeah ccp messed up big time on this one.
They haven't said anything about it because they probably don't know what to say. Only time will tell. But as it stands on commercial release (whenever that is) they have to refund all merc packs bought before jan 22nd and currently any merc packs bought from GameStop. No, they don't need to refund my merc pack, in fact I insist they don't. Since I don't want to have all my SP reset I'll just let them keep what I've spent, while the rest of you whiners can go insist having your characters' SP reset for the refund. Working on your earlier (unsubstantiated) assumption that an AUR refund requires a character reset, I suppose that makes sense. It does if that refund includes any Aurum spent on boosters. |
KalOfTheRathi
CowTek IT Infotech
267
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 07:00:00 -
[108] - Quote
Baal Roo wrote:Yup, I still fully expect CCP to honor the conditions they set when they sold me the merc pack. If they don't, I expect a full refund. You can blow it out any available orifice, Kitten.
Try and get a refund from Activision or EA. Even when they completely puke out a turd of a product or completely screw the launch, release or server support a refund for anything from a game company is not gonna happen.
You spent a reasonably small amount of money and you got more than a reasonable amount of game play out of it. It is certainly more than the 8 to 10 hours the has become the standard for video games.
Your sense of entitlement is even worse when compared to your lack of common sense. |
Mithridates VI
The Southern Legion
481
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 07:04:00 -
[109] - Quote
KalOfTheRathi wrote:Baal Roo wrote:Yup, I still fully expect CCP to honor the conditions they set when they sold me the merc pack. If they don't, I expect a full refund. You can blow it out any available orifice, Kitten. Try and get a refund from Activision or EA. Even when they completely puke out a turd of a product or completely screw the launch, release or server support a refund for anything from a game company is not gonna happen. You spent a reasonably small amount of money and you got more than a reasonable amount of game play out of it. It is certainly more than the 8 to 10 hours the has become the standard for video games. Your sense of entitlement is even worse when compared to your lack of common sense.
You are responding as if he said "I'm not satisfied with the product and I want a refund."
Bringing value for money into the conversation is irrelevant. Expecting someone you entered into a legal agreement with to honour their end of the deal isn't an unreasonable sense of entitlement. |
XeroTheBigBoss
Pink Fluffy Bounty Hunterz
62
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 07:32:00 -
[110] - Quote
Apparently you all didn't read my post on page5...I said THE END at the end of it meaning this discussion is over! It is in BETA! THE END!!! Devs please lock this up!
THE END!!! |
|
Rasatsu
Much Crying Old Experts
553
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 07:53:00 -
[111] - Quote
XeroTheBigBoss wrote:Apparently you all didn't read my post on page5...I said THE END at the end of it meaning this discussion is over! It is in BETA! THE END!!! Devs please lock this up!
THE END!!! Too late, you can't stop a bad thread from turning to a worst thread. |
Baal Roo
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
990
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 08:04:00 -
[112] - Quote
KalOfTheRathi wrote:Baal Roo wrote:Yup, I still fully expect CCP to honor the conditions they set when they sold me the merc pack. If they don't, I expect a full refund. You can blow it out any available orifice, Kitten. Try and get a refund from Activision or EA. Even when they completely puke out a turd of a product or completely screw the launch, release or server support a refund for anything from a game company is not gonna happen. You spent a reasonably small amount of money and you got more than a reasonable amount of game play out of it. It is certainly more than the 8 to 10 hours the has become the standard for video games. Your sense of entitlement is even worse when compared to your lack of common sense.
Let me put this in terms you might better understand:
You go to Walmart, pick out two 24 packs of Mountain Dew and two family size bags of Cheetos. You get up to the register and the lady behind the counter runs it all over the scanner and charges you $24 for the whole kit and kaboodle. Then she takes one 24 pack and one bag of Cheetos and sets it behind the counter, and hands you one 24 pack and one bag of chips and says "have a nice day".
I'm you.
CCP is the cashier.
You're the next guy in line that says "Come on pal, why are you complaining? You got some mountain dew and some Cheetos, ain't that good enough? Why does it matter if you only get half of what you paid for, you're holding up the line here." |
The dark cloud
Seraphim Initiative. CRONOS.
1170
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 09:25:00 -
[113] - Quote
CCP can dodge your request by never going to full release. They just simply state that the open beta never ends and you are screwed. After all there is no timestamp on a "official release". Its that simple to be honest. Funny how nobody even remotely thought about it. And because they can state that this game is in open beta they can add/tweak the gameplay however they want. This goes aswell for additional content like maps or new weapons and so on. They just throw it in and say "hey guys we have something new to test for you". I think this is the same way how eve works out. |
Three Double-A Batteries
Fraternity of St. Venefice Amarr Empire
89
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 09:45:00 -
[114] - Quote
Here's about where it will be.
CCP Legal and PR will be working on two things:
- Ensuring screwing you over doesn't trip any commercial laws in BIG markets that mean they could find themselves answering to people just filing a complaint online to a local Government body. I imagine if this happened the burden of paperwork for CCP would be a lesson in itself. This would mainly be legislation in the US and EU. If they can't in a way that is unambiguous (e.g. a long freaking bow) this will shape the next item.
- Working on some spin for gaming news websites, people raising petitions and the inevitable Dev Blog that explains why reneging on T&Cs is only fair and just for all. This may even involve throwing a bone or two.
If they can get the exposure down to a level where people would only be able to ping them on a civil level - i.e. who would you? It will be a risk management position they will accept.
Face it, this will be another bottom line issue of CCP saying something in public and doing something very different in private.
It's just been harder for them to do it this time. |
Rasatsu
Much Crying Old Experts
553
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 09:47:00 -
[115] - Quote
Go to the gaming press, tell them about how CCP is screwing you guys by not doing another reset. |
Mithridates VI
The Southern Legion
483
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 09:51:00 -
[116] - Quote
The dark cloud wrote:CCP can dodge your request by never going to full release. They just simply state that the open beta never ends and you are screwed. After all there is no timestamp on a "official release". Its that simple to be honest. Funny how nobody even remotely thought about it..
They did think about it and they mentioned so earlier in the thread.
They certainly can do that but I don't think they really want to alienate all of their players like that. |
Kaze Eyrou
ROGUE SPADES
63
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 09:53:00 -
[117] - Quote
In before lock....
Again....
*rolls eyes* |
Captain-Awesome
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
364
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 09:54:00 -
[118] - Quote
Reads some posts.....
shakes head.....
backs out slowly....
|
Calgoth Reborn
United Front LLC
178
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 09:58:00 -
[119] - Quote
My take on the whole thing is that the wording was a contingence for character reset on release as every other reset my Aurum and items got refunded. If there Is no further character reset's than I wouldn't need a refund if there was I would fully expect a refund on my aurum and item's |
boba's fetta
Thukker Tribe Holdings Inc. Gathering Of Nomadic Explorers
19
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 10:46:00 -
[120] - Quote
"Hello guys,
Just a quick clarification: there will be no more resets of any kind since we fully moved to Tranquility. The description that you see on AUR items in the marketplace right now will be removed during todayGÇÖs Open Beta downtime to reflect this.
Thank you."
i see a lot of you fail to read. so let me break this down for you. he is saying that merc packs sold once the game has its last reset, people buying merc packs will not be refunded. if they bought them before this date then the old terms still apply.
if you know ccp then you will understand something has most likly gone wrong and there working on a fix.
as for the exculsive days you have already had them same as me and so did anyone in the closed beta. you had several days from the last reset till the server opened to anyonne to just download..
|
|
BASSMEANT
ZionTCD Legacy Rising
174
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 11:51:00 -
[121] - Quote
lol
op got ganked by the devs
Peace B |
calisk galern
BurgezzE.T.F Orion Empire
46
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 13:22:00 -
[122] - Quote
yay...these ass hats are going to force a server wipe...thanks for that >.> |
Noc Tempre
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
1270
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 14:40:00 -
[123] - Quote
calisk galern wrote:yay...these ass hats are going to force a server wipe...thanks for that >.>
I couldn't care less if everyone got 10M SP or 0 SP. If it leads to a better game and a more honest CCP it is the best course of action. |
Gunner Nightingale
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
391
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 15:25:00 -
[124] - Quote
calisk galern wrote:yay...these ass hats are going to force a server wipe...thanks for that >.>
Yay and ass hat over here prefers to bury their head in the sand rather then acknowledge CCP screwed up.
https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=642189#post642189
Not everyone here is clamoring for an AUR refund. I sure as hell dont want one because i know what it inevitably would mean for them to do it. Point is CCP keeps going in circles and STILL has the original language of the TC at a different vendor. Add to this their continued commitement to no SP reset, only possible SP reimbursements in skill subsections affected by a content update and everything else this puts CCP in seriously murky water.
Compound this with the TC make references to the EULA (a agreement that they can change at will and by us simply logging we tacitly agree to that agreement which they could but like WON'T ever use to wiggle out of this conundrum) and you have the makings of something that could utterly railroad and derail their project.
Pretending that this is not a problem or dismissing players as ignorant, stupid or entitled makes you look even worse and clearly demonstrates your ignorance at the larger issue. The bury your head in the sand and hope(lock it until) it goes away doesnt solve the issue and will only get worse as time moves forward.
1. CCP needs to address the language of wheter this is or is not Commercial release
2. If it is still a beta CCP needs Gamestop to remove or update that disclaimer (as many of you claim its still beta)
3. If it is still a beta and there are no AURUM resets problem becomes they took money for an unfinished product.
4. You arguing that a person is stupid for spending money on an unfinished product and expecting reimbursement of IN GAME funds not ACTUAL REFUND OF MONEY clearly dont understand Consumer product law, you acting like this isn't an issue for CCP to worry about displays remarkable ignorance.
|
Flamesea
Shadow Company HQ
4
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 13:57:00 -
[125] - Quote
Good post Nightingale +1 |
Big Popa Smurff
Seraphim Initiative. CRONOS.
119
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 14:31:00 -
[126] - Quote
No to Aur reset, all those Aur milita bpo's bought cheap before open beta will be lost |
Flamesea
Shadow Company HQ
4
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 14:43:00 -
[127] - Quote
would like to have 30day active boosters from Merc pack's back (+aur) :) |
tribal wyvern
ZionTCD Legacy Rising
706
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 15:56:00 -
[128] - Quote
Frank Devine wrote:When I got the merc pack everything was to be refunded when this game came out if beta, since then I have also spent another 60.00 on AUR and I want it back as promises and I want my 3 day head start that I am suppose to get.
You are no different than the rest of us who bought aurum, you get no special treatment you self entitled snob. |
Noc Tempre
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
1283
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 15:58:00 -
[129] - Quote
tribal wyvern wrote:Frank Devine wrote:When I got the merc pack everything was to be refunded when this game came out if beta, since then I have also spent another 60.00 on AUR and I want it back as promises and I want my 3 day head start that I am suppose to get. You are no different than the rest of us who bought aurum, you get no special treatment you self entitled snob.
You willingly giving up your rights does not mean he is a snob for not. CCP chose to make the language that way, and they have not even suggested the language was faulty when that would satisfy a majority of us disgruntled early adopters. |
Winscar Shinobi
Better Hide R Die
110
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 16:47:00 -
[130] - Quote
You know the only reason we don't get anymore resets is because the sp snobs don't know what a ******* beta is and were QQing that they kept having their SP reset to test the game, you know the point of a beta. So if you think about it, it's an argument between 2 sides that both believe they are entitled, except one side has a legally binding contract on their side.
And people please stfu with the "reset their sp if they want a aur refund" your logic is flawed but you're too far into self defense mode for your sp to realize it. |
|
Baal Roo
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
997
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 20:50:00 -
[131] - Quote
tribal wyvern wrote:Frank Devine wrote:When I got the merc pack everything was to be refunded when this game came out if beta, since then I have also spent another 60.00 on AUR and I want it back as promises and I want my 3 day head start that I am suppose to get. You are no different than the rest of us who bought aurum, you get no special treatment you self entitled snob. People were warned in advance by dev posts that the move to TQ would also be the last aurum reset and that all spent aurum would not be refunded.
First of all, this is absolutely a matter of "entitlement". A paying customer is entitled to recieve the product advertised. There's nothing "snobbish" about expecting CCP to actually honor the purchase agreement.
Furthermore, just because a developer made a post on a website about SP resets doesn't mean anyone should assume that their previous purchase agreements are now null-and-void. With all the trash that gets posted here, you really think a vaguely worded post that doesn't even MENTION the Merc Pack is enough to negate the terms of purchase at time of sale?
If I sell you a 12 pack of mountain dew I can't wait until after you've paid and then say "I am now going to remove 6 cans from this box", proceed to remove 6 cans, and then say "well, I TOLD YOU I was removing 6 cans". That's absolutely ridiculous and the fact that you're arguing for the validity of such a transaction just shows you haven't bothered to actually think about what you're posting. |
Laheon
Osmon Surveillance Caldari State
290
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 20:55:00 -
[132] - Quote
Oh. I thought this was the other thread, in which a kid cried about hitting his SP cap with a cap booster. Oh well. I was looking for a cheap laugh and didn't get it :( |
EnIgMa99
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
247
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 20:55:00 -
[133] - Quote
Isnt this subject to change under by CCP ? |
Winscar Shinobi
Better Hide R Die
112
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 20:59:00 -
[134] - Quote
EnIgMa99 wrote:Isnt this subject to change by CCP ?
Yes however in the terms ccp has to give something equal to what was in the merc pack. Ergo they have to give players something big, equivalent to what's in the pack. |
Mithridates VI
Circle of Huskarl Minmatar Republic
509
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 21:02:00 -
[135] - Quote
Winscar Shinobi wrote:EnIgMa99 wrote:Isnt this subject to change by CCP ? Yes however in the terms ccp has to give something equal to what was in the merc pack. Ergo they have to give players something big, equivalent to what's in the pack. A MONOCLE. |
Baal Roo
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
999
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 21:13:00 -
[136] - Quote
EnIgMa99 wrote:Isnt this subject to change by CCP ?
Sure, they can give out items "of equal value" to the merc pack items at launch. Heck, they can probably twist and worm their way out of doing much of anything about it, but I don't think that's the sort of reputation they are trying to build with console gamers is it? One in which they sell you a product and then screw you out of part of the purchase afterwards with technicalities? It doesn't really hurt them to actually honor the agreement that THEY SET THE TERMS FOR.
It's not like we're trying to trick anyone or screw CCP out of anything, we are just asking that they give us ALL of the products we purchased within the spirit of the terms they set rather than them deciding POST-SALE that they no longer want to honor HALF of the freakin' deal.
I don't see why in the hell that's too much to ask or why people are getting their panties in a wad over such a request. |
Mithridates VI
Circle of Huskarl Minmatar Republic
509
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 21:16:00 -
[137] - Quote
Baal Roo wrote:I don't see why in the hell that's too much to ask or why people are getting their panties in a wad over such a request.
Because they totally fail to actually understand the issue or put any time into considering it and think you want free AUR that you aren't entitled to for purely greedy reasons. |
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
631
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 21:20:00 -
[138] - Quote
Baal Roo wrote: It's not like we're trying to trick anyone or screw CCP out of anything, we are just asking that they give us ALL of the products we purchased within the spirit of the terms they set rather than them deciding POST-SALE that they no longer want to honor HALF of the freakin' deal that we (their PAYING customers) purchased.
I don't see why in the hell that's too much to ask or why people are getting their panties in a wad over such a request.
Because you already received the benefits of the initial purchase. Did you use the 30 day booster that came with the merc pack? If so, give back any SP that you received thanks to boosters ( is there a way of tracking that? ), then we can talk refunds. At the moment it just sounds like closed beta testers want a 2 for 1 deal. |
Sete Clifton
PSU GHOST SYNDICATE
76
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 21:20:00 -
[139] - Quote
Baal Roo wrote:EnIgMa99 wrote:Isnt this subject to change by CCP ? Sure, they can give out items "of equal value" to the merc pack items at launch. Heck, they can probably twist and worm their way out of doing much of anything about it, but I don't think that's the sort of reputation they are trying to build with console gamers is it? One in which they sell you a product and then screw you out of part of the purchase afterwards with technicalities? It doesn't really hurt them to actually honor the agreement that THEY SET THE TERMS FOR. It's not like we're trying to trick anyone or screw CCP out of anything, we are just asking that they give us ALL of the products we purchased within the spirit of the terms they set rather than them deciding POST-SALE that they no longer want to honor HALF of the freakin' deal that we (their PAYING customers) purchased. I don't see why in the hell that's too much to ask or why people are getting their panties in a wad over such a request.
I think it's just that the community see's this in two different ways. Such as myself, where I personally don't see CCP not giving a refund as screwing us over or tricking us. While technically/legally they are obligated to do something, to me I was well under the impression that everything in terms of characters/items was final when moving into the open beta. I realize they're statements about that on the forums aren't legally binding, and technically you're right, but I just feel like I was well enough informed and I planned accordingly. So personally, I don't mind if I don't get anything in terms of a refund or even an equal valued item. I understand why you and others feel the way you do, but I think a lot of people also feel as I do and don't really blame CCP in any way. And we'd rather not risk losing our SP, items, or ISK for a refund of something we believe we spent knowing it was final. |
Mithridates VI
Circle of Huskarl Minmatar Republic
510
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 21:23:00 -
[140] - Quote
Sloth9230 wrote:Because you already received the benefits of the initial purchase. Did you use the 30 day booster that came with the merc pack? Give back any SP that you received thanks to boosters ( is their a way of tracking that? ), then we can talk refunds. At the moment it just sounds like closed beta testers want a 2 for 1 deal.
The initial purchase was 1 x Mercenary Pack + these items credited to the account for each character reset and for commercial release.
That's what was purchased. That's what the purchase agreement said and what people were told they were paying for. Treating this like the initial items were the purchase is missing the point. |
|
Sete Clifton
PSU GHOST SYNDICATE
76
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 21:33:00 -
[141] - Quote
Mithridates VI wrote:Sloth9230 wrote:Because you already received the benefits of the initial purchase. Did you use the 30 day booster that came with the merc pack? Give back any SP that you received thanks to boosters ( is their a way of tracking that? ), then we can talk refunds. At the moment it just sounds like closed beta testers want a 2 for 1 deal. The initial purchase was 1 x Mercenary Pack + these items credited to the account for each character reset and for commercial release. That's what was purchased. That's what the purchase agreement said and what people were told they were paying for. Treating this like the initial items were the purchase is missing the point.
I don't agree that treating it as the items is missing the point.
Let's be reasonable and realistic here. No one bought a merc pack thinking they were going to be getting a second set (applicable to their final characters) of what was in them. It was assumed there would be a reset before launch and that we'd get one of every item. Yes, CCP messed up with their wording, there's no doubt to that. But we still all got the items we paid for and they have been applied to characters that will continue into the released build. While legally you are all correct, I don't see how anyone can't admit that they would in the end be getting twice what they paid for by getting a refund. An apology by CCP would be sufficient in my opinion. Although I don't personally want one. |
Dr Stabwounds
Planetary Response Organisation Test Friends Please Ignore
29
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 21:35:00 -
[142] - Quote
OP and similar OP's are too entitled. There is nothing good that can come of this. Gonna sue over some virtual items that you already used over some poor language and in the process screw at least some portion of the community. There seems to be no way to not screw the community over if you people get your refund (especially the non-Aur users). Kitten off, you pieces of kitten. I'm hoping there is some language in the ToU that can get them out of it.
And yes I've spent $ on this, but I would really like it if they didn't have to refund/reset anything. |
Baal Roo
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
999
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 21:39:00 -
[143] - Quote
Mithridates VI wrote:Sloth9230 wrote:Because you already received the benefits of the initial purchase. Did you use the 30 day booster that came with the merc pack? Give back any SP that you received thanks to boosters ( is their a way of tracking that? ), then we can talk refunds. At the moment it just sounds like closed beta testers want a 2 for 1 deal. The initial purchase was 1 x Mercenary Pack + these items credited to the account for each character reset and for commercial release. That's what was purchased. That's what the purchase agreement said and what people were told they were paying for. Treating this like the initial items were the purchase is missing the point.
Exactly. Basically, it seems like Sloth is arguing that the Merc Pack was "too good of a deal" and that we shouldn't care that we are not GETTING the deal that the merc pack offered because recieving HALF of the deal is GOOD ENOUGH.
Sorry Sloth, but that's CCP's fault, not mine. I bought the Merc Pack because I knew that once the Beta was OVER and all of the awesome LAUNCH stuff was in the game that I would get my AUR back and get another booster. That's what CCP offered and that's what I purchased.
If it you believe it was an overly generous offer on their part, then take it up with CCP, but don't act like I'm being a **** for wanting them to honor the purchase that I made with my real world dollars. That's just ridiculous.
They offered a "2 for 1 deal" not me, I bought the deal that THEY offered. It's not my fault they realized post-facto that they shouldn't have sold me what they sold me, they don't get to just remove half the deal after the fact. |
Knarf Black
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
521
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 21:42:00 -
[144] - Quote
Clearly they thought 'Commercial Release' and the final character wipe were going to happen simultaneously when they wrote the initial language.
Legally you guys are absolutely right, though I feel that CCP's intentions with the merc pack were quite obvious from the get-go. You bought it, got to use it in previous builds, and had everything in it reset along with the character wipes. The belief that they intended to just give everyone who bought it another 40K AUR when the game crossed an arbitrary 'commercial release' threshold was naive wishful thinking. That the wording indicates otherwise is clearly just a screw-up on CCP's part. (A screw up that's possibly legally binding.)
Essentially, everyone is simultaneously wrong. |
Baal Roo
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
999
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 21:43:00 -
[145] - Quote
Sete Clifton wrote:Mithridates VI wrote:Sloth9230 wrote:Because you already received the benefits of the initial purchase. Did you use the 30 day booster that came with the merc pack? Give back any SP that you received thanks to boosters ( is their a way of tracking that? ), then we can talk refunds. At the moment it just sounds like closed beta testers want a 2 for 1 deal. The initial purchase was 1 x Mercenary Pack + these items credited to the account for each character reset and for commercial release. That's what was purchased. That's what the purchase agreement said and what people were told they were paying for. Treating this like the initial items were the purchase is missing the point. I don't agree that treating it as the items is missing the point. Let's be reasonable and realistic here. No one bought a merc pack thinking they were going to be getting a second set (applicable to their final characters) of what was in them. It was assumed there would be a reset before launch and that we'd get one of every item. Yes, CCP messed up with their wording, there's no doubt to that. But we still all got the items we paid for and they have been applied to characters that will continue into the released build. While legally you are all correct, I don't see how anyone can't admit that they would in the end be getting twice what they paid for by getting a refund. An apology by CCP would be sufficient in my opinion. Although I don't personally want one.
CCP are the ones who decided to move forward in this way, not the people who purchased the Merc Pack. I had no way at the time of purchasing the merc pack of knowing exactly how all this would proceed. The only thing I knew FOR SURE was that I was purchasing A HEAD START and 40,000 AUR plus a bunch of cool items that I would get AT LAUNCH to use with a completed non-beta product.
When the Merc Pack was originally being sold, it was pushed as being a "prepurchase" for awesome stuff to use at launch, and the fact that we could use the stuff over and over again in the beta was irrelevant. The point of the Merc Pack at the time was to get all of this cool stuff AT LAUNCH when we were finally going to be playing a "full product". |
Baal Roo
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
999
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 21:46:00 -
[146] - Quote
also, just to clarify:
CCP Eterne wrote: We are not in Commercial Release. Any statements of such from a GM was inaccurate.
posted TODAY |
Mithridates VI
Circle of Huskarl Minmatar Republic
511
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 21:51:00 -
[147] - Quote
A player could reasonably have used their merc pack items and AUR for beta testing purposes with the reasonable assumption (based on CCP's word) that the items would be refunded.
It is reasonable to assume that they also believed that a reset would occur at this time.
That CCP decided to declare that a reset would NOT occur at this time was an unpredictable development for the players making this purchase. If that declaration also meant to suggest that these items would not be refunded, it's breaching the terms of the purchase agreement.
It's not reasonable to not give them anything back because it was sold with a promise of future rewards.
It's not reasonable to give their their items back and reset their characters because this is penalising only the people who bought merc packs by excessively disadvantaging them by removing their non-boosted SP, which is an acknowledgement of the time they have invested in their character.
CCP now have the difficult task of reconciling a promise not to reset characters with a promise to give items of equal value to the mercenary pack to some of these players. I understand that it's not ideal but the players requesting this are not at fault for it and shouldn't be disadvantaged for expecting the company to honour their agreements.
Disclaimer: I bought the merc pack under the updated terms and gain nothing from this.
|
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
632
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 22:13:00 -
[148] - Quote
All items purchased are under Sony's TOS, Sony reserves the right to change their TOS at their discretion at any time, you agree to those terms every time you use their first party services, last I checked that includes PSN. So... guess what? The terms on the Merc pack changed, tough luck.
You could always try getting a lawyer though, good luck. |
Winscar Shinobi
Better Hide R Die
115
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 22:21:00 -
[149] - Quote
When it comes down to it the only people to blame is CCP. They not only made a promise, they made it a legally binding contract.
The people who want their aur are rightfully allowed to want it, and ccp is legally obligated to give it to them when the time comes.
Just the same as people who don't want their aur are entitled to not want it.
Honestly when it comes down to it, if I promised, and signed a contract to give someone something, I would give it to them. Simply because I have pride in my word. Maybe ccp should too. |
Winscar Shinobi
Better Hide R Die
115
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 22:24:00 -
[150] - Quote
Sloth9230 wrote:All items purchased are under Sony's TOS, Sony reserves the right to change their TOS at their discretion at any time, you agree to those terms every time you use their first party services, last I checked that includes PSN. So... guess what? The terms on the Merc pack changed, tough luck.
You could always try getting a lawyer though, good luck.
Yes, but when purchasing an item you agree to those terms at point of purchase. A term change only effects future purchases.
An if it comes down to lawyers then I just have to say, it's pathetic that people would go so far to get out of something they agreed to. |
|
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
632
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 22:36:00 -
[151] - Quote
Winscar Shinobi wrote:Sloth9230 wrote:All items purchased are under Sony's TOS, Sony reserves the right to change their TOS at their discretion at any time, you agree to those terms every time you use their first party services, last I checked that includes PSN. So... guess what? The terms on the Merc pack changed, tough luck.
You could always try getting a lawyer though, good luck. Yes, but when purchasing an item you agree to those terms at point of purchase. A term change only effects future purchases. Yeah, and one of the terms they agreed to was the fact that the terms are subject to change. |
Winscar Shinobi
Better Hide R Die
115
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 22:39:00 -
[152] - Quote
Sloth9230 wrote:Winscar Shinobi wrote:Sloth9230 wrote:All items purchased are under Sony's TOS, Sony reserves the right to change their TOS at their discretion at any time, you agree to those terms every time you use their first party services, last I checked that includes PSN. So... guess what? The terms on the Merc pack changed, tough luck.
You could always try getting a lawyer though, good luck. Yes, but when purchasing an item you agree to those terms at point of purchase. A term change only effects future purchases. Yeah, and one of the terms they agreed to was the fact that the terms are subject to change.
You don't understand laws well do you? |
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
632
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 22:44:00 -
[153] - Quote
Winscar Shinobi wrote:Sloth9230 wrote:Winscar Shinobi wrote:Sloth9230 wrote:All items purchased are under Sony's TOS, Sony reserves the right to change their TOS at their discretion at any time, you agree to those terms every time you use their first party services, last I checked that includes PSN. So... guess what? The terms on the Merc pack changed, tough luck.
You could always try getting a lawyer though, good luck. Yes, but when purchasing an item you agree to those terms at point of purchase. A term change only effects future purchases. Yeah, and one of the terms they agreed to was the fact that the terms are subject to change. You don't understand laws well do you? Nope |
Winscar Shinobi
Better Hide R Die
115
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 22:52:00 -
[154] - Quote
Then why are you trying to argue something that you don't have a good knowledge of?
Oh wait I forgot this is the Internet XD |
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
632
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 22:54:00 -
[155] - Quote
Winscar Shinobi wrote:Then why are you trying to argue something that you don't have a good knowledge of?
Oh wait I forgot this is the Internet XD Because I was bored, duh. |
Commercially Released
Sanmatar Kelkoons Minmatar Republic
1
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 22:58:00 -
[156] - Quote
Baal Roo wrote:Mithridates VI wrote:Sloth9230 wrote:Because you already received the benefits of the initial purchase. Did you use the 30 day booster that came with the merc pack? Give back any SP that you received thanks to boosters ( is their a way of tracking that? ), then we can talk refunds. At the moment it just sounds like closed beta testers want a 2 for 1 deal. The initial purchase was 1 x Mercenary Pack + these items credited to the account for each character reset and for commercial release. That's what was purchased. That's what the purchase agreement said and what people were told they were paying for. Treating this like the initial items were the purchase is missing the point. Exactly. Basically, it seems like Sloth is arguing that the Merc Pack was "too good of a deal" and that we shouldn't care that we are not GETTING the deal that the merc pack offered because recieving HALF of the deal is GOOD ENOUGH. Sorry Sloth, but that's CCP's fault, not mine. I bought the Merc Pack because I knew that once the Beta was OVER and all of the awesome LAUNCH stuff was in the game that I would get my AUR back and get another booster. That's what CCP offered and that's what I purchased. If it you believe it was an overly generous offer on their part, then take it up with CCP, but don't act like I'm being a **** for wanting them to honor the purchase that I made with my real world dollars. That's just ridiculous. They offered a "2 for 1 deal" not me, I bought the deal that THEY offered. It's not my fault they realized post-facto that they shouldn't have sold me what they sold me, they don't get to just remove half the deal after the fact.
This man gets it. |
Commercially Released
Sanmatar Kelkoons Minmatar Republic
1
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 23:00:00 -
[157] - Quote
Baal Roo wrote:also, just to clarify: CCP Eterne wrote: We are not in Commercial Release. Any statements of such from a GM was inaccurate.
posted TODAY
These words have been posted before. CCP Etene is just as likely to know the truth as the Lead GM, both answer to the same legal and marketing team. What I do know is the GM checked before answering, while Etene gave the impression this was his first investigation into the matter. |
Bogon Vdemotch
Expert Intervention Caldari State
13
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 23:01:00 -
[158] - Quote
Gunner Nightingale wrote:calisk galern wrote:yay...these ass hats are going to force a server wipe...thanks for that >.> Yay and ass hat over here prefers to bury their head in the sand rather then acknowledge CCP screwed up. https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=642189#post642189Not everyone here is clamoring for an AUR refund. I sure as hell dont want one because i know what it inevitably would mean for them to do it. Point is CCP keeps going in circles and STILL has the original language of the TC at a different vendor. Add to this their continued commitement to no SP reset, only possible SP reimbursements in skill subsections affected by a content update and everything else this puts CCP in seriously murky water. Compound this with the TC make references to the EULA (a agreement that they can change at will and by us simply logging we tacitly agree to that agreement which they could but like WON'T ever use to wiggle out of this conundrum) and you have the makings of something that could utterly railroad and derail their project. Pretending that this is not a problem or dismissing players as ignorant, stupid or entitled makes you look even worse and clearly demonstrates your ignorance at the larger issue. The bury your head in the sand and hope(lock it until) it goes away doesnt solve the issue and will only get worse as time moves forward. 1. CCP needs to address the language of wheter this is or is not Commercial release 2. If it is still a beta CCP needs Gamestop to remove or update that disclaimer (as many of you claim its still beta) 3. If it is still a beta and there are no AURUM resets problem becomes they took money for an unfinished product. 4. You arguing that a person is stupid for spending money on an unfinished product and expecting reimbursement of IN GAME funds not ACTUAL REFUND OF MONEY clearly dont understand Consumer product law, you acting like this isn't an issue for CCP to worry about displays remarkable ignorance. Lastly demanding the RIGHTS i enjoy as a CONSUMER does indeed make me "entitled" what it doesnt make me is privileged or spoiled which is the word i think you're really looking for.
+40,000.
PROTIP: Hire a PR guy, CCP. You need one. Its amazing how fast these endless semantic boondoggles have alienated me from any trust in CCP.
|
Marston VC
SVER True Blood Unclaimed.
135
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 23:02:00 -
[159] - Quote
The thing about refunding is that theoretically they would be giving away a LOT of free stuff. The raven assault suits.... the militia bpo's.... anything somebody bought using AUR after the price increase would essentially be given away if they refund the SP. So somebody might think, "ok so why dont they just take away what they bought using the AUR" but the problem with that is that it would be a huge mess with every closed beta tester ATM. The reason for that being is that part of our reward for being closed beta testers was the ability to buy the AUR items dirt cheap before they increased the prices on them. This and the fact that they cant revert "boosted" SP from the player makes it a really difficult decision as far as refunds go.
At the end of the day CCP is a business, and as any business i expect them to make whatever choice is more likely to make them/ save them more money in the end. |
Commercially Released
Sanmatar Kelkoons Minmatar Republic
1
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 23:13:00 -
[160] - Quote
Marston VC wrote:The thing about refunding is that theoretically they would be giving away a LOT of free stuff. The raven assault suits.... the militia bpo's.... anything somebody bought using AUR after the price increase would essentially be given away if they refund the SP. So somebody might think, "ok so why dont they just take away what they bought using the AUR" but the problem with that is that it would be a huge mess with every closed beta tester ATM. The reason for that being is that part of our reward for being closed beta testers was the ability to buy the AUR items dirt cheap before they increased the prices on them. This and the fact that they cant revert "boosted" SP from the player makes it a really difficult decision as far as refunds go.
At the end of the day CCP is a business, and as any business i expect them to make whatever choice is more likely to make them/ save them more money in the end.
The issue at stake is how much $ is spent to get the same in game advantage; people could and did buy more AUR, including under the new terms. So proponents of full wipes to keep things "fair" are pretty much demanding a pay to win system be enforced. |
|
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
632
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 23:25:00 -
[161] - Quote
Winscar Shinobi wrote: You don't understand laws well do you?
Anyway, how about you enlighten me as to why that's not legal?
Yes, the terms that apply are the ones that were in place when you made the purchase. One of those terms was that the terms themselves could change, and people agreed to it buy purchasing it anyway, they continued to agree to them everytime they logged in to PSN. |
Baal Roo
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
1001
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 23:40:00 -
[162] - Quote
Sloth9230 wrote:Winscar Shinobi wrote: You don't understand laws well do you?
Anyway, how about you enlighten me as to why that's not legal? Yes, the terms that apply are the ones that were in place when you made the purchase. One of those terms was that the terms themselves could change, and people agreed to it buy purchasing it anyway, they continued to agree to them everytime they logged in to PSN.
In the U.S. the term that "these terms can change" is not legally binding/recognized. Otherwise, every legally binding contract would simply include this term and no seller would ever be held liable for anything. Such a term inherently negates the premise of having terms in the first place. |
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
632
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 23:42:00 -
[163] - Quote
Baal Roo wrote: In the U.S. the term that "these terms can change" is not legally binding/recognized.
Oh okay, I was not aware of that. |
Baal Roo
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
1002
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 23:49:00 -
[164] - Quote
Sloth9230 wrote:Baal Roo wrote: In the U.S. the term that "these terms can change" is not legally binding/recognized.
Oh okay, I was not aware of that.
to clarify, when this particular term is in an agreement, it means that people who purchase a product AFTER the terms have changed are not legally entitled to the earlier terms. It does not apply to purchases made before the terms changed, all purchased made prior to said change are bound to the previous terms.
Basically, Joe Public who buys the Merc Pack after they changed the terms can't say "Well, those people got different terms, you OWE me the same deal that they got". A more specific example would be the extra dropsuits that some players received in the Merc Pack. I didn't get them because I bought the Merc Pack too soon, and players who buy the Merc Pack now don't get them because that bonus is now over. We have no legal claim to those suits because the agreement clearly states the terms may change. However, anyone who bought it while those dropsuits were offered are legally entitled to them, even though they are no longer available to others.
make sense now? |
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
632
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 23:51:00 -
[165] - Quote
Baal Roo wrote:Sloth9230 wrote:Baal Roo wrote: In the U.S. the term that "these terms can change" is not legally binding/recognized.
Oh okay, I was not aware of that. to clarify, when this particular term is in an agreement, it means that people who purchase a product AFTER the terms have changed are not legally entitled to the earlier terms. It does not apply to purchases made before the terms changed, all purchased made prior to said change are bound to the previous terms. Basically, Joe Public who buys the Merc Pack after they changed the terms can't say "Well, those people got different terms, you OWE me the same deal that they got". A more specific example would be the extra dropsuits that some players received in the Merc Pack. I didn't get them because I bought the Merc Pack too soon, and players who buy the Merc Pack now don't get them because that bonus is now over. We have no legal claim to those suits because the agreement clearly states the terms may change. However, anyone who bought it while those dropsuits were offered are legally entitled to them, even though they are no longer available to others. make sense now? Yeah. |
snipper doo
Osmon Surveillance Caldari State
4
|
Posted - 2013.04.06 01:40:00 -
[166] - Quote
Bump |
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 :: [one page] |