Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
The Black Jackal
The Southern Legion
302
|
Posted - 2013.02.18 10:09:00 -
[211] - Quote
SquaggaTCT wrote:Noc Tempre wrote:SoTa PoP wrote:Deadeyes Anterie wrote:Woah has Internal Error mellowed you out Sota Pop?
I like this kumbaya attitude. This is actually me. I've just been trolling a bit too much and forget to show my sexy side. Even if you're not perfect for the job Jackal's - you're the only one pushing with even a slight chance. Since I don't see a way a poor CSM could actually harm us over not having one at all - I'm all for you lol A poor CSM hurts us more than no representative. Whelp we do need a CSM, one that would benefit us all. We need ot have a voice spoken for the mercs. Obviously not everyone is going to be able to agree on one person, however we do need one. I think it should be put to a poular vote.
If there were multiple candidates running for the CSM, I discussed this with a few people (including some of the hosts of Podside (a podcast on which I occasionally guest), and should there be multiple candidates who want to put themselves on the line for running for a position on the CSM for DUST 514, I would gladly call a 'Primary' Vote. Whereby everyone who has a vote (unfortunetly only people with EVE Accounts at this stage) would do an informal 'vote' for a candidate of their choice. Whomever was elected from those would stand for CSM, and everyone's vote would go to them to ensure we get our best chance to have a representative on the CSM.
As I have shown with my campaign so far, EVE Players ARE open to the idea, some have even encouraged candidates to step up.
I have pushed for this position, and now I am starting to work with others on the CPM about improving DUST 514's outlook to competetive gaming groups, as well as getting involved in oprganizing some of Kain's excellent OB Events (discussions still in the works).
I have come to admit, that sometimes I can be as stubborn as most, and I still stand by my conviction that a CSM representative is needed for the future of this game. And I believe that my passion for this game, and knowledge of both this game, and EVE Online gives me a good chance to gain us representation on the CSM.
I already have an EVE-side Voter Bloc or two on my side, and hopefully, them, combined with any support we can muster from DUST-side, we can be represented. If that is the only thing I achieve from running for CSM, that we get a representative for this game, and become a true part of New Eden, I'll be happy.
Of course, I'd like to do more, but that will be up to your support, and your votes. |
Iron Wolf Saber
BetaMax.
2867
|
Posted - 2013.02.18 13:10:00 -
[212] - Quote
Noc Tempre wrote:SoTa PoP wrote:Deadeyes Anterie wrote:Woah has Internal Error mellowed you out Sota Pop?
I like this kumbaya attitude. This is actually me. I've just been trolling a bit too much and forget to show my sexy side. Even if you're not perfect for the job Jackal's - you're the only one pushing with even a slight chance. Since I don't see a way a poor CSM could actually harm us over not having one at all - I'm all for you lol A poor CSM hurts us more than no representative.
I will have to side with this, because it its far easier to have a random non csm walk in here and tap community shoulder's when they don't know things about dust and have time to sit and listen and talk with us.
Just right now the situation is well... dictator by default there is not a secondary candidate two pick between and if I had to vote I have to roll it into the faction warfare person since they are going to be dealing with us the most.
The reason why I say this is that with no dedicated csm representative we're more likely to get heard in one form or another. IE forcing CSM randoms to having to camp out with us to study observe and blend in even. Verses appointing just one guy that mishandles our message, becomes 'the face' of dust 514 that I think is part of the reason why so many eve pilots would like to see the game fail and does not relay our community that well. |
Captain-Awesome
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
349
|
Posted - 2013.02.18 13:22:00 -
[213] - Quote
I have 2 issues.
1. No Dust representative should be on the EVE CSM without EVE as their primary objective and only dust integration as their second objective.
2. You've only come to the CPM channel once, and don't even attend the #dust514 channel at all.
So 2 things. I appreciate that you are trying to take a proactive approach to structuring the community, and hope you keep running.
But I think your current efforts are shallow, unconstructed and wholly unworkable.
if you want to be taken seriously you need to go above and beyond a regular forum poster, this means:
Attend IRC on a regular basis Help the community grow (via events, promotion, news feeding and more) Create worthwhile contacts within the community to back you up (political / influential / well known users) Use the tools you are provided to help the community get input (cpm.newEden.co, create a website or something!)
I've not witnessed any of the above, apparently you came into the cpm chat room once when I was away... but that's it, would like to see you in there more often to see you talk about what you want to do, and how you listen to other peoples opinion, but until then, you have given no action to the community, which is ultimately what counts.
|
Iron Wolf Saber
BetaMax.
2867
|
Posted - 2013.02.18 13:28:00 -
[214] - Quote
Captain-Awesome wrote:I have 2 issues.
1. No Dust representative should be on the EVE CSM without EVE as their primary objective and only dust integration as their second objective.
2. You've only come to the CPM channel once, and don't even attend the #dust514 channel at all.
So 2 things. I appreciate that you are trying to take a proactive approach to structuring the community, and hope you keep running.
But I think your current efforts are shallow, unconstructed and wholly unworkable.
if you want to be taken seriously you need to go above and beyond a regular forum poster, this means:
Attend IRC on a regular basis Help the community grow (via events, promotion, news feeding and more) Create worthwhile contacts within the community to back you up (political / influential / well known users) Use the tools you are provided to help the community get input (cpm.newEden.co, create a website or something!)
I've not witnessed any of the above, apparently you came into the cpm chat room once when I was away... but that's it, would like to see you in there more often to see you talk about what you want to do, and how you listen to other peoples opinion, but until then, you have given no action to the community, which is ultimately what counts.
When I say clout, this is what I mean. People with higher levels of clout can sway more voices, looks, and directions than people with low clout. Which is why a simple accusation from a low clout person like myself is effective against someone with almost no clout at all.
I have energy invested into it, and its mostly into the forums, the whole reason why you probably mislabeled me, there are others with bigger better plans in motion that I am unable to stop, and would be a stupid idea to stop. It's not my job to go round curb stomping people anyways, but rather improve community quality overall which is a very tough task having to deal with console kiddy cryers every day to the 'whats a beta' folks. Results are varied but some of them have managed to turn into semi-proper dust players after being informed that this shooter is not their typical shooter at all.
And although I would love to cough up the logs I am in a situation where I cannot generate, however if you had enough clout, my accusation could have been made baseless as someone else would have willingly provided them. People are still risk adverse for sticking their necks out for others.
Ultimately this is your biggest hurdle, to most people who visit the forums regularly they still don't know you at all, nobody knows the person behind the csm mask which in my opinion should not put on, just be your damn self for once and stop reading from a telepromter.
I mean just hang out in the dust 514 public for a while get a generalized feel for what people deal with every day in the game. |
Noc Tempre
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
1170
|
Posted - 2013.02.18 18:38:00 -
[215] - Quote
The Black Jackal wrote:SquaggaTCT wrote:Noc Tempre wrote:SoTa PoP wrote:Deadeyes Anterie wrote:Woah has Internal Error mellowed you out Sota Pop?
I like this kumbaya attitude. This is actually me. I've just been trolling a bit too much and forget to show my sexy side. Even if you're not perfect for the job Jackal's - you're the only one pushing with even a slight chance. Since I don't see a way a poor CSM could actually harm us over not having one at all - I'm all for you lol A poor CSM hurts us more than no representative. Whelp we do need a CSM, one that would benefit us all. We need ot have a voice spoken for the mercs. Obviously not everyone is going to be able to agree on one person, however we do need one. I think it should be put to a poular vote. If there were multiple candidates running for the CSM, I discussed this with a few people (including some of the hosts of Podside (a podcast on which I occasionally guest), and should there be multiple candidates who want to put themselves on the line for running for a position on the CSM for DUST 514, I would gladly call a 'Primary' Vote. Whereby everyone who has a vote (unfortunetly only people with EVE Accounts at this stage) would do an informal 'vote' for a candidate of their choice. Whomever was elected from those would stand for CSM, and everyone's vote would go to them to ensure we get our best chance to have a representative on the CSM. As I have shown with my campaign so far, EVE Players ARE open to the idea, some have even encouraged candidates to step up. I have pushed for this position, and now I am starting to work with others on the CPM about improving DUST 514's outlook to competetive gaming groups, as well as getting involved in oprganizing some of Kain's excellent OB Events (discussions still in the works). I have come to admit, that sometimes I can be as stubborn as most, and I still stand by my conviction that a CSM representative is needed for the future of this game. And I believe that my passion for this game, and knowledge of both this game, and EVE Online gives me a good chance to gain us representation on the CSM. I already have an EVE-side Voter Bloc or two on my side, and hopefully, them, combined with any support we can muster from DUST-side, we can be represented. If that is the only thing I achieve from running for CSM, that we get a representative for this game, and become a true part of New Eden, I'll be happy. Of course, I'd like to do more, but that will be up to your support, and your votes.
Actions should proceed words.
You don't need any votes to do more right now. Maybe after you've done something for the community we can judge if you are fit for CSM. The best of a field of one does not mean seating you would be a good choice. There is a reason more qualified people have not stepped up, and that is because it is premature. |
The Black Jackal
The Southern Legion
302
|
Posted - 2013.02.23 11:26:00 -
[216] - Quote
I'm currently working on an Idea for making an on-going League-style competition with the CPM (namely mentioned to Kane and Captain Awesome), I'm also recording hours of footage with my eagerly anticipated Capture Station (been waiting on back order for months) to make some Tutorial Videos...
The videos will cover everything from The UI, Neocom, to issuing Squad Leader Command from the Map AND from the Command Wheel.
I know nothing is produced yet, but I am trying to show my passion for this game that pre-dates it's release in Closed Beta.
But in spite of this, sometimes words precede actions. In this case, I am trying to find a medium. Compromise. I have spoken out against the formation of the CPM I the past, at least as a completely Independent entity. Despite this, I have often said they have done great things for this community.
Now I'm working alongside the CPM, if not becoming directly involved in it, as a form of compromise. I'm not giving up my stance that a CSM Representative is required for DUST now, but I'm willing to come back from denouncing the CPM and work with them to improve this game and market it not only to EVE players, or develop it as an Advertisement for EVE, but as a platform for Online Competitive Gaming, and bring it to equality with EVE Online. |
xAckie
Ahrendee Mercenaries Legacy Rising
125
|
Posted - 2013.02.23 11:39:00 -
[217] - Quote
Captain-Awesome wrote:
Attend IRC on a regular basis
I dont see how an atypical group of the community (those on IRC) should be seen as a pre-requisite for a CSM.
I have no idea how CSM elections are usually done but if we vote then I will look at a persons platform. What they stand for and what they have done.
|
The Black Jackal
The Southern Legion
302
|
Posted - 2013.02.28 11:24:00 -
[218] - Quote
Coming so close to Officially lodging my candidacy for CSM8 on behalf of DUST 514 and EVE Online Integration. I'm reposting here to bring my candidacy to the fore, and remind everyone that I am still running.
I may have had many differences with some members of the community, and though our views differ in many respects, I believe that we all are working for the same goals. To make this game the best it can be, and to ensure CCP gives us the Core Components of the game, such as great gameplay, persistent game world, and meaningful (but not compulsory) impact on the universe of New Eden.
I have recently been endeavouring to work with the volunteer association of the CPM in creating a more community-based game, as well as inspiring the competitive nature of the game in the form of Tournaments and Leagues.
This is a simple re-iteration of the fact that I will be running for CSM, and that I will endeavour to do my best to represent the ideals of DUST and EVE Integration into the massive, deep, and long-standing universe of New Eden.
The Black Jackal aka. Hunter Blake |
Cyn Bruin
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
663
|
Posted - 2013.02.28 13:53:00 -
[219] - Quote
The Black Jackal wrote:Coming so close to Officially lodging my candidacy for CSM8 on behalf of DUST 514 and EVE Online Integration. I'm reposting here to bring my candidacy to the fore, and remind everyone that I am still running.
Are you sure you don't want to back out? It's the popular thing to do right now...
|
Kain Spero
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
932
|
Posted - 2013.02.28 14:33:00 -
[220] - Quote
The Black Jackal wrote:Coming so close to Officially lodging my candidacy for CSM8 on behalf of DUST 514 and EVE Online Integration. I'm reposting here to bring my candidacy to the fore, and remind everyone that I am still running.
I may have had many differences with some members of the community, and though our views differ in many respects, I believe that we all are working for the same goals. To make this game the best it can be, and to ensure CCP gives us the Core Components of the game, such as great gameplay, persistent game world, and meaningful (but not compulsory) impact on the universe of New Eden.
I have recently been endeavouring to work with the volunteer association of the CPM in creating a more community-based game, as well as inspiring the competitive nature of the game in the form of Tournaments and Leagues.
This is a simple re-iteration of the fact that I will be running for CSM, and that I will endeavour to do my best to represent the ideals of DUST and EVE Integration into the massive, deep, and long-standing universe of New Eden.
The Black Jackal aka. Hunter Blake
The fact that you have stopped by and talked to the CPM volunteers is greatly appreciated. I know that you and I disagree in some very key areas, but anyone who is willing to set disagreements and in-game politics aside and discuss things for the betterment of the community will always be welcomed. I still think it's too early for a CSM with their main platform being Dust.
I still really don't like some of your ideas like the safe dock for super-capitals and your ideas of redistributing and homogenizing Null-sec resources "to make things more fluid". Have you discussed any of these ideas with leaders in the Null Sec community?
What specifically would you do for low sec?
What are your opinions on the recent development and statements by CCP regarding the economics and mechanics of future Dust SOV/Faction Warfare?
Do you still feel that Dust should not have it's own localized representation and do you still feel Dusters should vote directly for the CSM? |
|
slystylz vassar
Military Gamers
8
|
Posted - 2013.02.28 17:20:00 -
[221] - Quote
Let's say you don't get elected to CSM8; are you planning on working for a Dust514 MCC (Merc Command Council) or planetary Council, to develop a voice to game feature development independent of the CSM system and it's original purpose? Which is to provide Eve Online game development feedback for CCP. |
Iron Wolf Saber
BetaMax.
2891
|
Posted - 2013.02.28 17:21:00 -
[222] - Quote
well if jackal loses the election and unloads the platforms a bit I can see jackal being a more useful ambassador between the two groups. |
The Black Jackal
The Southern Legion
302
|
Posted - 2013.02.28 22:55:00 -
[223] - Quote
Kain Spero wrote: The fact that you have stopped by and talked to the CPM volunteers is greatly appreciated. I know that you and I disagree in some very key areas, but anyone who is willing to set disagreements and in-game politics aside and discuss things for the betterment of the community will always be welcomed. I still think it's too early for a CSM with their main platform being Dust.
I still really don't like some of your ideas like the safe dock for super-capitals and your ideas of redistributing and homogenizing Null-sec resources "to make things more fluid". Have you discussed any of these ideas with leaders in the Null Sec community?
What specifically would you do for low sec?
What are your opinions on the recent development and statements by CCP regarding the economics and mechanics of future Dust SOV/Faction Warfare?
Do you still feel that Dust should not have it's own localized representation and do you still feel Dusters should vote directly for the CSM?
On your first point, I personally believe it isn't too early for a CSM representative for DUST 514. Even if we are in BETA now, we are already impacting (albeit in only a small measure currently) on the Universe of New Eden. Orbital conflicts are starting to become more common as people try to support DUST soldiers.
The impact of % speed modifier on System Capture / Defence is being measured by many Faction Warfare Corporations, and found to be quite valuable if a co-ordinated effort is made on particular systems.
I agree that some of my nullsec ideas may not be exactly what are needed, but they are ideas aimed at inciting conflict in Nullsec. Some leaders I did discuss it with were amicable to the idea, some were steadfast against the ideas. Some have greatly supported the idea of integrating DUST into nullsec via the Station Capture / Destruction options.
DUST having it's own representative council of 'elected' bodies, I believe, would still segregate the communities. That's not to say that an organisation like the CPM can possibly be a bad thing, but the CSM should represent New Eden as a whole. Up until now, that has included only EVE Capsuleers, but now we are the new residents of New Eden, and we deserve to have a voice on how we interact with the rest of the Universe on the body that has represented New Eden for so many years.
slystylz vassar wrote:Let's say you don't get elected to CSM8; are you planning on working for a Dust514 MCC (Merc Command Council) or planetary Council, to develop a voice to game feature development independent of the CSM system and it's original purpose? Which is to provide Eve Online game development feedback for CCP.
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:well if jackal loses the election and unloads the platforms a bit I can see jackal being a more useful ambassador between the two groups.
Here I will agree with Iron Wolf Saber. Should I lose the election, I will still actively encourage representation on the CSM (for next term) but I will continue to work with the current CPM to make it a stronger, more active body in the community, and could easily be an ambassador between the CPM and CSM.
I will still hold onto my ideal situation where DUST is represented on the CSM, but it will not repclude me from being active in the community, working with the stellar volunteers of the CPM, and trying my best to aid the integration of this game. |
The Black Jackal
The Southern Legion
302
|
Posted - 2013.03.03 13:14:00 -
[224] - Quote
These are some things I've decided to elaborate on. Ideas that I'm putting forward, not as part of my CSM Campaign, but as visions for the future of this game, EVE, New Eden, and beyond! I hope to share these visions with you, in the hopes that you can see where I want to lead the community, the game, and it's true potential.
DUST / EVE Integration
I stand for our desire to be a part of the New Eden Community. A part of their world. A part, in such a way, that we are to them, as they are to each other. We play a different game, but these games exist, side-by-side in a grand universe, in real-time, with the ability to affect each other in profound, and meaningful ways.
This begins in Faction Warfare. With the ability to fire at, and call in fire from EVE Capsuleers in orbit. A functionality that is already half in effect. Such a link, magnificent in the making, deserves nourishment, and expansion, into planetary blockades, defence satellites, truly immersive gameplay.
DUST Immersion and Expansion
Here, I will make a statement, and hope that DUST players and EVE players alike don't crucify me before I can clarify my position. DUST needs more of EVE's framework built into it.
We've all been in the 'Instant Battles' that resemble nothing more than the stale, old style of First Person Shooters we either love or hate. But it's the same thing. DUST has the potential to be so much more. To me, and the overlay of an EVE-style structure on the premise of an MMO FPS like DUST would give it a level of immersion beyond the scope of anything out there, save EVE itself.
Each DISTRICT would become as a System in EVE, with multiple controllable sections, building lots, and truly customizable templates (Player-owned Bases) that can serve as manufacturing, gathering, and defence installations. Each DISTRICT then has points, similar to Stargates, that link it to other Districts across a Planet's Surface. These points are neutral (CONCORD Controlled), and allow travel to other DISTRICTs for people, vehicles, and aircraft. This gives the ability for Planetary Warfare to span multiple DISTRICTs at a tme, and develop overall strategy. Also grants Planets equivalency to Constellations in EVE.
Each Planet can also have multiple 'Starports' for lack of a better term to allow inter-planetary travel between 'linked' Planets in a System. Thus System-wide Warfare can be extended.
Now, some of your may ask, where do MCCs and Warbarges fit into this? It's a great question, one I'm happy to provide an answer to. Warbarges are where your vehicles are stored, your deployable installations, and other forms of non-carriable equipment belong, waiting to be called down. So if your Warbarge is in orbit, you gain access to your deployable equipment, Precision Strikes, and so on. The MCC is required to 'dock' at certain facitilities to assume control. This 'ship' is controlled by the Commander, and holds firepower enough to damage another MCC, or large ground installations. It also doubles as a mobile Base, able to carry HAVs, LAVs, and Dropships beyond the zone of influence of your Warbarge. (Think Airborne Carrier).
Travelling beyond the influence of your MCC disconnects you from it's CRU, and you then rely on deployed or captured CRUs. Moving beyond the Influence of your Warbarge, means you lack the ability to call in your support vehicles, and / or installations. These ideas, based within the framework of New Eden, will bring new depth to this grand, expansive MMO FPS and take it beyond anything developed.
Some have asked one question, "If DUST and EVE are unable to grief each other, has the link failed?" This was raised during a conversation with volunteers working for the CPM in fact, a meeting I was fortunate enough to be a part of for a time. And overwhelmingly, the answer was YES. Even from the EVE Players in attendance.
The above ideas give the framework for deep, involved interaction that will bring these two communities together in such a way that there will be no DUST 514, and no EVE Online, but New Eden, and two ways to see the Universe.
One Universe // One War |
Cerebral Wolf Jr
Immobile Infantry
760
|
Posted - 2013.03.03 14:13:00 -
[225] - Quote
This whole things stupid on such a huge scale and people are way too egotistical to see it. I'm a big EVE player, i'm involved in politics more now than i've ever been but now is not the time for a Dust rep on the CSM nor do we need our own god damn council.
It's such a stupid and egotistical thing right now, the Dust community does not need multiple people on some CPM to represent it. Dust does not have the depth of EVE right now where it needs multiple people on multiple platforms to make sure that each individual aspect gets dealt with correctly for god sake.
EVE and Dust do not need some idiot representing both games either who thinks that walking in stations needs to be a priority for CCP or that destructible stations will fix nullsec for small corps, your crossing Zebras interview was pretty damn shocking and you're not going to get much support from the EVE based community, i'm surprised you didn't get laughed out of the CZ Podcast to be quite frank. There's not even any Dust based election process or support right now either so you're not going to get any votes from there.
Do you really, honestly, deep down think that you stand ANY chance at all of getting on the CSM this year? |
The Black Jackal
The Southern Legion
303
|
Posted - 2013.03.03 14:20:00 -
[226] - Quote
Cerebral Wolf Jr wrote:This whole things stupid on such a huge scale and people are way too egotistical to see it. I'm a big EVE player, i'm involved in politics more now than i've ever been but now is not the time for a Dust rep on the CSM nor do we need our own god damn council.
It's such a stupid and egotistical thing right now, the Dust community does not need multiple people on some CPM to represent it. Dust does not have the depth of EVE right now where it needs multiple people on multiple platforms to make sure that each individual aspect gets dealt with correctly for god sake.
EVE and Dust do not need some idiot representing both games either who thinks that walking in stations needs to be a priority for CCP or that destructible stations will fix nullsec for small corps, your crossing Zebras interview was pretty damn shocking and you're not going to get much support from the EVE based community, i'm surprised you didn't get laughed out of the CZ Podcast to be quite frank. There's not even any Dust based election process or support right now either so you're not going to get any votes from there.
Do you really, honestly, deep down think that you stand ANY chance at all of getting on the CSM this year?
I do, and I also believe that now is exactly the time to be running for CSM8.
If I didn't believe that, I wouldn't be running.
And for that matter, the purpose of me running is to get DUST that depth for those willing to delve into it. I don't want, and nor do many others, to see this turn into a gimmick for EVE Online, or just another cookie cutter FPS. |
Cerebral Wolf Jr
Immobile Infantry
760
|
Posted - 2013.03.03 14:22:00 -
[227] - Quote
So your reply is simply "yes"?
There's no further explanation as to why you think now is the right time or why you think you stand a chance?
I've been heavily involved with all the podcasts and CSM stuff over the last month or so and to be quite frank, i think you're the weakest candidate right now. Even below Darius III. |
The Black Jackal
The Southern Legion
303
|
Posted - 2013.03.03 14:25:00 -
[228] - Quote
Cerebral Wolf Jr wrote:So your reply is simply "yes"?
There's no further explanation as to why you think now is the right time or why you think you stand a chance?
I've been heavily involved with all the podcasts and CSM stuff over the last month or so and to be quite frank, i think you're the weakest candidate right now. Even below Darius III.
If you'd read any of this thread at all, you'd know the reasons behind my choice, my conviction, and my stances.
Some have changed, such as my stance on the CPM, but I suggest you read before you post questions like you did. I answered your question, assuming that you had at least read the majority of my posts in this self-same thread. |
Cerebral Wolf Jr
Immobile Infantry
761
|
Posted - 2013.03.03 14:38:00 -
[229] - Quote
No i've not read the whole thread nor do i intend to, if you can't answer my questions directly what does that say of your commitment to the community?
If by some miracle you got elected and had to be the peoples voice you'll have to communicate with people on a one on one basis on a very regular occurrence. Hans has been amazing as has Two-Step and Trebor in answering and an all questions i've ever put to them, as has Mynnna who will be the chair of CSM8 and i speak with Mynnna on a very regular basis, Mynnna has always made the attempt to answer my Dust questions and he has never even played the damn game but at least he has a good idea of what the community wants.
Are you saying that every time someone messages you on skype or in game you're reply is going to be "I've already answered this question in this forum thread, or on this podcast so you need to go there and read it?..
Come on, get your **** together and convince me. |
The Black Jackal
The Southern Legion
303
|
Posted - 2013.03.03 14:46:00 -
[230] - Quote
Cerebral Wolf Jr wrote:No i've not read the whole thread nor do i intend to, if you can't answer my questions directly what does that say of your commitment to the community?
If by some miracle you got elected and had to be the peoples voice you'll have to communicate with people on a one on one basis on a very regular occurrence. Hans has been amazing as has Two-Step and Trebor in answering and an all questions i've ever put to them, as has Mynnna who will be the chair of CSM8 and i speak with Mynnna on a very regular basis, Mynnna has always made the attempt to answer my Dust questions and he has never even played the damn game but at least he has a good idea of what the community wants.
Are you saying that every time someone messages you on skype or in game you're reply is going to be "I've already answered this question in this forum thread, or on this podcast so you need to go there and read it?..
Come on, get your **** together and convince me.
Firstly, I'm disinclined to answer your question directly due to the fact that your opening statement was derogatory, accusatory, and had no respect for anyone else's opinions but you own. Had you asked for an answer to your question without such antagonistic remarks, either to myself or to the VOLUNTEERS working for the community, I would have been inclined to be more forthcoming.
On that front, however, I'm not one to shirk a challenge, and will answer your question thusly.
I believe that this is the right time for a CSM Representative for DUST 514 because we are now, even in Open Beta, a Part of New Eden, and though our influence is currently quite small, it is present, and growing, even without additional features introduced by CCP Developers. Short of some disastrous turn of events, DUST 514 is likely slated to be released sometime during this CSMs term (estimated) and we need representation as a part of New Eden upon release, not years down the track after we've been sidelined.
In addition, as CSM representative, I can help guide, with the help of the community and volunteers, such as those forming the CPM, our integration with the major elements of EVE Online, and become another facet of New Eden, as much as Wormholes, Nullsec, and Faction Warfare. Able to have an impact, and be impacted on, each and every aspect of New Eden in some measure.
|
|
Cerebral Wolf Jr
Immobile Infantry
763
|
Posted - 2013.03.03 15:08:00 -
[231] - Quote
First of all, if you got elected you'd have to deal with a lot of people who don't give a **** about you being disinclined to answer anything for what ever reason but would still be expecting a reply so you need to learn to deal with it and your initial reaction says to me that you're just not ready to be dealing with the community. Hunter Blake as an EVE pod pilot should know this was going to come and should have prepared himself to deal with correctly when the time comes rather than attempting to belittle someone for wanting answers and not being interested enough to read your entire thread.
You should be trying to convince me to give you a vote rather than playing forum warrior right now because it's not just me you're talking to right now, every single member of the community can read your replys and will judge you based on what you put in that reply.
Why do you think now is the right time for CSM representation? There's simply not enough content in the game to warrant a seat on the CSM and yes i think that we'll see release during CSM8's tenure, i also believe that there's nothing at all someone on the CSM can do right now. CCP have their own roadmap right now, they have core gameplay mechanics to pin down and finalise in addition to getting the content that they need into the game, what can you possibly do to make that better that CCP can't do by coming to the forums and posting a thread for input themselves? This community is not big enough or diverse enough right now for that.
Not only that but in your above post you say that Dust needs representation upon release, not years down the line. What's stopping CCP from giving us a voice upon release rather than years down the line? You have to concede that you're thinking long term here which i appreciate and agree with but right now there's very little you can do Dust side, correct?..
Part of what you're saying i agree with, the CPM is a stupid idea run by a bunch of people with Ego's too buy to be actually interested in what the community needs but i have severe concerns about your ability to represent the community too, some of your ideas are shockingly bad, you say you've spoken to several high level nullsec entitys about the ideas you've had EVE side such as redistribution of minerals and destructible stations, who are they and what specifically did they say so that i can confirm you have actually spoken to people and they have agreed with some of your stuff because it's important that you're telling the truth and not simply making **** up to attempt to get more votes.
You don't need to bea CSM rep to help guide the community and volunteers, you don't need to be on the CSM to help the CPM, you're probably better off keeping your distance from them personally. You don't need to be on the CSM to help integration with major EVE Elements, the major EVE community elements you're talking about are all here already and doing their own thing and don't need your help so what else can you offer?
|
The Black Jackal
The Southern Legion
303
|
Posted - 2013.03.03 15:21:00 -
[232] - Quote
Cerebral Wolf Jr wrote:First of all, if you got elected you'd have to deal with a lot of people who don't give a **** about you being disinclined to answer anything for what ever reason but would still be expecting a reply so you need to learn to deal with it and your initial reaction says to me that you're just not ready to be dealing with the community. Hunter Blake as an EVE pod pilot should know this was going to come and should have prepared himself to deal with correctly when the time comes rather than attempting to belittle someone for wanting answers and not being interested enough to read your entire thread.
You should be trying to convince me to give you a vote rather than playing forum warrior right now because it's not just me you're talking to right now, every single member of the community can read your replys and will judge you based on what you put in that reply.
Why do you think now is the right time for CSM representation? There's simply not enough content in the game to warrant a seat on the CSM and yes i think that we'll see release during CSM8's tenure, i also believe that there's nothing at all someone on the CSM can do right now. CCP have their own roadmap right now, they have core gameplay mechanics to pin down and finalise in addition to getting the content that they need into the game, what can you possibly do to make that better that CCP can't do by coming to the forums and posting a thread for input themselves? This community is not big enough or diverse enough right now for that.
Not only that but in your above post you say that Dust needs representation upon release, not years down the line. What's stopping CCP from giving us a voice upon release rather than years down the line? You have to concede that you're thinking long term here which i appreciate and agree with but right now there's very little you can do Dust side, correct?..
Part of what you're saying i agree with, the CPM is a stupid idea run by a bunch of people with Ego's too buy to be actually interested in what the community needs but i have severe concerns about your ability to represent the community too, some of your ideas are shockingly bad, you say you've spoken to several high level nullsec entitys about the ideas you've had EVE side such as redistribution of minerals and destructible stations, who are they and what specifically did they say so that i can confirm you have actually spoken to people and they have agreed with some of your stuff because it's important that you're telling the truth and not simply making **** up to attempt to get more votes.
You don't need to bea CSM rep to help guide the community and volunteers, you don't need to be on the CSM to help the CPM, you're probably better off keeping your distance from them personally. You don't need to be on the CSM to help integration with major EVE Elements, the major EVE community elements you're talking about are all here already and doing their own thing and don't need your help so what else can you offer?
I wont rehash that top point. I didn't say I was disinclined to answer you outright, I was disinclined to answer you based on your opening abusive statement.
You say there isn't enough content to warrant a seat on the CSM. All told, most people might say that because Wormholes aren't as large a part of EVE as Null, they don't need a representative, or Faction Warfare. The fact is that each facet of NEW EDEN is represented by the CSM, and each FACET influences another. And DUST, though new to New Eden, is yet another Facet. CCP itself has quoted they want New Eden to be a universe 'viewable through two windows' when referring to the DUST / EVE link. And even have the motto, One Universe // One War.
If CCP has this roadmap for integration, as they've had roadmaps for EVE's development, and DUST development, why have a player-elected body at all? Why have a CSM if their vision is set in stone by their roadmap. Answer, it's not set in stone. They see where they want to go, as do I, but it's according to player representation that they determine how to get there together, in a respectable timeframe, and keep as many people happy as they do so.
This is was the CSM represents, and what I'm fighting for a right to be a part of.
As to the CPM. They are simply a volunteer group, building the community, through the community. Of course they want to take on an official capacity. Much like the CSM did so many years ago, and it's worthy goal to strive for. They do great work, even if our personal ideas about the future of this game conflict, I will support their endeavours to introduce E-Sports (Which was done in the recent OB Tournament on EVE-Bet) and other activities and bolster the DUST 514 Community itself.
You say, also, that the DUST 514 Community isn't large enough to warrant representation. DUST 514 has over One Million ACTIVE players. I believe it may be closer to 1.5 now (not entirely sure on the figure as it's going up constantly). Now if you're saying that a population of active accounts, that is roughly Three Times the Active Subscriber base of EVE Online doesn't deserve representation on the Player-elected Governing Body of New Eden, then what DOES constitute such a community? |
Cerebral Wolf Jr
Immobile Infantry
763
|
Posted - 2013.03.03 16:00:00 -
[233] - Quote
My opening statement wasn't abusive at all, just a simple, personal opinion. People on this forum, yourself included no doubt have seen me being abusive before that was certainly not it.
Yes, i'm aware of the motto and CCP wanting New Eden to be able to be viewed between two lenses, i get that and i think it's a great idea. Having said that i simply don't see Dust having enough content right now for someone to represent us. I agree that next year we WILL need someone on the CSM, the same as Wormholes and FW have because we'll be rolling at full steam by that point all being well but right now i can't see anyone running for CSM on a Dust platform for any other reason than their own ego or the fact that this will be one of the easiest CSM's to get a seat on and they just want to see if they can do it.
Prior to this thread, many people had no idea who the hell you was in either Dust or EVE and you should be politically active and promoting the community BEFORE you run for CSM not when you decide its what you want to do. You should have been getting people on your side and to trust you and vote for you 6 months ago not right now.
I see where you're coming from with your talk about the roadmap etc but i really do not see the point this early in the game. 12 months is not a long time to wait before we put someone up for the CSM next year, some of us have already been here over 12 months now and we've not needed anyone on the CSM to voice our issues to CCP so far so why should that change any time in the next 2-3 months?... Next year when we're in release, when we have more interaction between the games and more content and a much larger player base? YES! We'll need someone but not right now, you've been tore to pieces in pretty much every single place you've attempted to voice this, on podcasts, on either forum in your threads etc... That is the voice of the community telling you that we don't think the time is right for this. You're all ready showing the community that you don't listen or represent us because we've said time and time again that we don't want representation right now.
I'm all for some of the stuff that's been done by this "CPM", Kain Spero's done an amazing job with all the work he's put in and i can't praise the guy enough but he's the other end of the spectrum to you, what have you done other than attempt to run for CSM? Nothing to what i can see.
E-Sports in Dust is something i fully support, i think it's a great idea for certain parts of the community and thats what they are here for in the first place, ZionShad's done a great job with trying to get E-Sports into Dust but that don't mean we need a CPM or a CSM to get it done.
Dust does not have over one million ACTIVE MEMBERS, it has 1.5 million characters in game and considering we get 3 characters per account and most people will have 3 characters ready on their accounts at any time that's 500k but we'll be generous and say 750k at most, even then how many of them have just signed up for simple quick games ala COD and Battlefield players?... How many of them have zero interation with the greater community or even know we're here? I'd say maybe 100k people at the very most. That's not a large community at all.
As much as i've ragged on MAG players in the past, the ones that are here and making the effort are the type of people we want more of and who have gained my respect in the last 6 months, not the COD/BF3 console kids who log in for a few quick games, don't give a **** about the over all direction of the community or even have any clue what the CSM or CPM are so don't spout numbers at me as if i'm suddenly going to roll over and admit that 1.5m characters in Dust is a reason to back down and change my opinions because that's not going to happen at all.
Hardly any of those numbers give a **** about what you're trying to achieve, so i stand by my comment
|
The Black Jackal
The Southern Legion
303
|
Posted - 2013.03.03 23:55:00 -
[234] - Quote
The question is not 'do we have enough content to warrant a CSM Rep' it is, do we have enough people. Even if what you say is true, and we take you 100k figure of a community. How many EVE Players have multiple accounts? I know plenty who have 2, many who have 3, and some who have 5 or more. We'll average that at 3 Accounts per player. So in essence, the 500k 'Active' Subscriptions for EVE Online boils down to roughly 125,000 People actually playing.
Now break it down further and say that 50% of them live in Nullsec, thats 62,500 people who have a candidate or multiples. 25% live in High sec, 31,250 who have a candidate or 2. 15% live in Wormholes, 10% in Faction Warfare. (NOTE: THese are not real values.)
You're SMALLEST community by these numbers is 12,500 Players... and THEY have a Representative on the CSM. We have a large amount of content coming for release. And beyond that, we will impact (we already are to a small degree) New Eden. The size of our community, and the fact we are now (even in Beta) a part of the community shows us that we need representation now.
It may not be 'required' but nor is a nullsec candidate, faction warfare candidate, nor a CSM in general. But it's there to provide feedback, community views, and opinions to CCP developers, so that they can tailor the next series of updates, expansions, and gameplay elements to suit the people more, and keep factions within the game happy. I'm well aware of DUSTs inability to vote, but they still need representation within the Universe that is EVE Online. |
Dexter Peabody
Immobile Infantry
3
|
Posted - 2013.03.04 00:05:00 -
[235] - Quote
The Black Jackal wrote:The question is not 'do we have enough content to warrant a CSM Rep' it is, do we have enough people. Even if what you say is true, and we take you 100k figure of a community. How many EVE Players have multiple accounts? I know plenty who have 2, many who have 3, and some who have 5 or more. We'll average that at 3 Accounts per player. So in essence, the 500k 'Active' Subscriptions for EVE Online boils down to roughly 125,000 People actually playing.
Now break it down further and say that 50% of them live in Nullsec, thats 62,500 people who have a candidate or multiples. 25% live in High sec, 31,250 who have a candidate or 2. 15% live in Wormholes, 10% in Faction Warfare. (NOTE: THese are not real values.)
You're SMALLEST community by these numbers is 12,500 Players... and THEY have a Representative on the CSM. We have a large amount of content coming for release. And beyond that, we will impact (we already are to a small degree) New Eden. The size of our community, and the fact we are now (even in Beta) a part of the community shows us that we need representation now.
It may not be 'required' but nor is a nullsec candidate, faction warfare candidate, nor a CSM in general. But it's there to provide feedback, community views, and opinions to CCP developers, so that they can tailor the next series of updates, expansions, and gameplay elements to suit the people more, and keep factions within the game happy. I'm well aware of DUSTs inability to vote, but they still need representation within the Universe that is EVE Online. I, too, completely make up numbers on the fly to support a bad argument.
The only purpose a DUST rep would have on the CSM is to develop the EVE-Dust link on the EVE side. Your interaction with CCP on Dust development would be extremely minimal, and your voice on EVE issues (which would be the overwhelming majority of time spent) would be better utilized by subject experts who do a specific thing.
You do have a voice on the EVE Universe, it's called the forums. The nature of the CSM and what they deal with are exclusive from DUST. If CCP wants to form an advisory board for us, that's an entirely different issue.
|
The Black Jackal
The Southern Legion
303
|
Posted - 2013.03.04 00:15:00 -
[236] - Quote
Dexter Peabody wrote:The Black Jackal wrote:The question is not 'do we have enough content to warrant a CSM Rep' it is, do we have enough people. Even if what you say is true, and we take you 100k figure of a community. How many EVE Players have multiple accounts? I know plenty who have 2, many who have 3, and some who have 5 or more. We'll average that at 3 Accounts per player. So in essence, the 500k 'Active' Subscriptions for EVE Online boils down to roughly 125,000 People actually playing.
Now break it down further and say that 50% of them live in Nullsec, thats 62,500 people who have a candidate or multiples. 25% live in High sec, 31,250 who have a candidate or 2. 15% live in Wormholes, 10% in Faction Warfare. (NOTE: THese are not real values.)
You're SMALLEST community by these numbers is 12,500 Players... and THEY have a Representative on the CSM. We have a large amount of content coming for release. And beyond that, we will impact (we already are to a small degree) New Eden. The size of our community, and the fact we are now (even in Beta) a part of the community shows us that we need representation now.
It may not be 'required' but nor is a nullsec candidate, faction warfare candidate, nor a CSM in general. But it's there to provide feedback, community views, and opinions to CCP developers, so that they can tailor the next series of updates, expansions, and gameplay elements to suit the people more, and keep factions within the game happy. I'm well aware of DUSTs inability to vote, but they still need representation within the Universe that is EVE Online. I, too, completely make up numbers on the fly to support a bad argument. The only purpose a DUST rep would have on the CSM is to develop the EVE-Dust link on the EVE side. Your interaction with CCP on Dust development would be extremely minimal, and your voice on EVE issues (which would be the overwhelming majority of time spent) would be better utilized by subject experts who do a specific thing. You do have a voice on the EVE Universe, it's called the forums. The nature of the CSM and what they deal with are exclusive from DUST. If CCP wants to form an advisory board for us, that's an entirely different issue.
I reiterated his figures that were 'made up' and used the same math he did as rough outline. The ideal is still the same. The CSM doesn't always deal with Wormholes, but they have a Representative, nor always with Faction Warfare.
I play EVE, I have a fair amount of knowledge pertaining to EVE, as CSM candidates are aware of the areas beyond their 'specialist' fields. By choosing to represent DUST 514, I have chosen a facet of NEW EDEN in the same way a wormhole candidate has done so, or a action Warfare Candidate has done so.
As to the link issue, this is a MAJOR part of DUST 514. The link is the basis around which this entire game was formed. It is a FPS MMO that LINKS with EVE Online. That was, and still is, one of the major selling points this game holds central. So having someone there, on the CSM, who wants to represent THAT LINK, is more important during this period of development because of that central focus. |
Dexter Peabody
Immobile Infantry
3
|
Posted - 2013.03.04 00:23:00 -
[237] - Quote
The Black Jackal wrote:Dexter Peabody wrote:The Black Jackal wrote:The question is not 'do we have enough content to warrant a CSM Rep' it is, do we have enough people. Even if what you say is true, and we take you 100k figure of a community. How many EVE Players have multiple accounts? I know plenty who have 2, many who have 3, and some who have 5 or more. We'll average that at 3 Accounts per player. So in essence, the 500k 'Active' Subscriptions for EVE Online boils down to roughly 125,000 People actually playing.
Now break it down further and say that 50% of them live in Nullsec, thats 62,500 people who have a candidate or multiples. 25% live in High sec, 31,250 who have a candidate or 2. 15% live in Wormholes, 10% in Faction Warfare. (NOTE: THese are not real values.)
You're SMALLEST community by these numbers is 12,500 Players... and THEY have a Representative on the CSM. We have a large amount of content coming for release. And beyond that, we will impact (we already are to a small degree) New Eden. The size of our community, and the fact we are now (even in Beta) a part of the community shows us that we need representation now.
It may not be 'required' but nor is a nullsec candidate, faction warfare candidate, nor a CSM in general. But it's there to provide feedback, community views, and opinions to CCP developers, so that they can tailor the next series of updates, expansions, and gameplay elements to suit the people more, and keep factions within the game happy. I'm well aware of DUSTs inability to vote, but they still need representation within the Universe that is EVE Online. I, too, completely make up numbers on the fly to support a bad argument. The only purpose a DUST rep would have on the CSM is to develop the EVE-Dust link on the EVE side. Your interaction with CCP on Dust development would be extremely minimal, and your voice on EVE issues (which would be the overwhelming majority of time spent) would be better utilized by subject experts who do a specific thing. You do have a voice on the EVE Universe, it's called the forums. The nature of the CSM and what they deal with are exclusive from DUST. If CCP wants to form an advisory board for us, that's an entirely different issue. I reiterated his figures that were 'made up' and used the same math he did as rough outline. The ideal is still the same. The CSM doesn't always deal with Wormholes, but they have a Representative, nor always with Faction Warfare. I play EVE, I have a fair amount of knowledge pertaining to EVE, as CSM candidates are aware of the areas beyond their 'specialist' fields. By choosing to represent DUST 514, I have chosen a facet of NEW EDEN in the same way a wormhole candidate has done so, or a action Warfare Candidate has done so. As to the link issue, this is a MAJOR part of DUST 514. The link is the basis around which this entire game was formed. It is a FPS MMO that LINKS with EVE Online. That was, and still is, one of the major selling points this game holds central. So having someone there, on the CSM, who wants to represent THAT LINK, is more important during this period of development because of that central focus. No, it's not a major element. It's a selling point. They need to finish developing the game because the majority of the Dust framework does not have a link to EVE and that's the stuff they need to work on before they add any more meaningful links. Blasting nerds from orbit is cool, but they don't really need a dude from Dust to say that.
|
The Black Jackal
The Southern Legion
303
|
Posted - 2013.03.04 00:34:00 -
[238] - Quote
What about shared market? Planetary Control? Faction Warfare influence? These are all integration elements. It's not just a matter of 'blasting' people from space. And it wont be. The link is key to more features in this game that raise it above and beyond the scope of CoD, Battlefield, and even MAG.
That's what we need represented.
Gameplay issues will never be satisfied. This is evidenced even by the EVE FOrums. The bugs, the patches, the fixes. But the core of the game needs to take priority at some stage, and we need to be there, represented, when it does. And it will happen prior to release, and DUST is closer to release this CSM term than before. |
Cerebral Wolf Jr
Immobile Infantry
770
|
Posted - 2013.03.04 12:57:00 -
[239] - Quote
You're still wrong and I will educate you on why when I get home from work. |
Cerebral Wolf Jr
Immobile Infantry
773
|
Posted - 2013.03.04 21:00:00 -
[240] - Quote
The Black Jackal wrote:What about shared market? Planetary Control? Faction Warfare influence? These are all integration elements. It's not just a matter of 'blasting' people from space. And it wont be. The link is key to more features in this game that raise it above and beyond the scope of CoD, Battlefield, and even MAG.
That's what we need represented.
Gameplay issues will never be satisfied. This is evidenced even by the EVE FOrums. The bugs, the patches, the fixes. But the core of the game needs to take priority at some stage, and we need to be there, represented, when it does. And it will happen prior to release, and DUST is closer to release this CSM term than before.
Why does the community need someone to sit on the CSM and tell CCP how the put in the things they are already planning to put into the game?
In fact, why don't you tell me exactly how you'd like to see them put into the game so we as a community can discuss and see if we think you deserve the job and are putting the interests of the community before your own?...
How should Dust impact Nullsec and why?...
How should the market be put in to interact with both games?...
What should the tax rates be on isk transfers between each game and why?
How should Dust side Lowsec work?
How will Concord interact with Dust?
How should OB's work in Lowsec and in Nullsec in comparison to Hisec and FW space?
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |