Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
The Black Jackal
The Southern Legion
302
|
Posted - 2013.02.12 03:25:00 -
[31] - Quote
Updated the OP with an expanded platfoirm outline.
Hopefully this will bring to light more of what I intend to represent for the DUST Community if I'm elected.
A vote for me, is a vote for a Larger Universe! |
Mavado V Noriega
SyNergy Gaming
2283
|
Posted - 2013.02.12 03:31:00 -
[32] - Quote
The Black Jackal wrote:I disagrre wholeheartedly that DUST needs it's own CSM... We need to be represented as a single Universe.
One War / One Universe.
CCP goals, full steam ahead. We may be separate games, but it's not the GAME itself that the CSM represents. It's the universe, and we co-exist with the Capsuleers in New Eden.
thats why u need 2 seperate CSMs u cant have 1-2 ppl on the current CSM make ALL the say for the entire DUST community thats ********.
U have to have them seperate to benefit DUST the most and when u have to discuss anything regarding the link between the 2 games that would affect each other u have both sit down and discuss it. |
The Black Jackal
The Southern Legion
302
|
Posted - 2013.02.12 04:05:00 -
[33] - Quote
Mavado V Noriega wrote:The Black Jackal wrote:I disagrre wholeheartedly that DUST needs it's own CSM... We need to be represented as a single Universe.
One War / One Universe.
CCP goals, full steam ahead. We may be separate games, but it's not the GAME itself that the CSM represents. It's the universe, and we co-exist with the Capsuleers in New Eden. thats why u need 2 seperate CSMs u cant have 1-2 ppl on the current CSM make ALL the say for the entire DUST community thats ********. U have to have them seperate to benefit DUST the most and when u have to discuss anything regarding the link between the 2 games that would affect each other u have both sit down and discuss it.
Why not?
The CSM represents the Universe we inhabit. New Eden, not just EVE. That's been pointed out. In addition., You generally have 1 or 2 candidates for Nullsec, 1 for Wormholes, 1 for Mission Runners, 1 for Faction Warfare... DUST is no different. The ideal is that those people represent the majority of the people in that sector.
Common saying goes that you cannot please everyone.
New Eden needs representation of DUST 514. Creating our own council would ONLY further the gap between DUST and EVE. Whereas we want to bring the two games closer. Sharing that Council will help that. |
Free Beers
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
1040
|
Posted - 2013.02.12 04:14:00 -
[34] - Quote
I'm not trying to troll/bash/harass/belitte/insult/etc I am just trying to save you the time and effort. Unless you can rep a specific part of EvE in addition Dust you will have a hard time finding support from either.
As someone who has assembled voting blocks for CSM candidates i can say you have almsot no chance.
I respect how you have put forth a platform and stood up to the challenge. It's honest and genuine. |
Vermaak 'Fatal' Kuvakei
Osmon Surveillance Caldari State
151
|
Posted - 2013.02.12 04:22:00 -
[35] - Quote
You're not the same guy going for a physically larger new Eden right? |
The Black Jackal
The Southern Legion
302
|
Posted - 2013.02.12 04:38:00 -
[36] - Quote
Free Beers wrote:I'm not trying to troll/bash/harass/belitte/insult/etc I am just trying to save you the time and effort. Unless you can rep a specific part of EvE in addition Dust you will have a hard time finding support from either.
As someone who has assembled voting blocks for CSM candidates i can say you have almsot no chance.
I respect how you have put forth a platform and stood up to the challenge. It's honest and genuine.
I am pushing to represent parts of EVE as well as DUST.
My Platform is DUST / EVE Integration. At the moment, that is Faction Warfare.
I have secondary platforms that influence other spheres, and also have a radical idea to bring Politics to DUST 514 with the CSM via the AURUM 'Citizen's Package' that allows DUST Soldiers to Vote AND Run for CSM... as well as a bonus 30 day booster for around the price of a Month's SUbscription to EVE.
(Roughly 20,000 AURUM)
Quote:In addition to the platform stated above, I intend to gain Voting rights for DUST 514 players through an AURUM Purchase. One per Account, equalling (roughly) a month's subscription to EVE-Online. This 'Citizen's Package' would also include a Month XP Booster, as well as the right to Vote and Run for CSM Election. |
The Black Jackal
The Southern Legion
302
|
Posted - 2013.02.12 04:40:00 -
[37] - Quote
Vermaak 'Fatal' Kuvakei wrote:You're not the same guy going for a physically larger new Eden right?
No, I'm not going for a physically larger New Eden. I'm talking 'A Larger Universe' by integration and building within what CCP has already created. (Though 'larger physically' could be an interesting future expansion.)
I'm talking planets, moons, developing interactions, integrating the DUST community INTO the New Eden world in a way that allows us, as DUST mercs, to be a weapon for EVE Pilots, and vice versa if you chose, but both games can exist independantly of each other as well.
|
Vermaak 'Fatal' Kuvakei
Osmon Surveillance Caldari State
151
|
Posted - 2013.02.12 05:06:00 -
[38] - Quote
The Black Jackal wrote:Vermaak 'Fatal' Kuvakei wrote:You're not the same guy going for a physically larger new Eden right? No, I'm not going for a physically larger New Eden. I'm talking 'A Larger Universe' by integration and building within what CCP has already created. (Though 'larger physically' could be an interesting future expansion.) I'm talking planets, moons, developing interactions, integrating the DUST community INTO the New Eden world in a way that allows us, as DUST mercs, to be a weapon for EVE Pilots, and vice versa if you chose, but both games can exist independantly of each other as well. Thank goodness for this clarification, because I found that to be an idiotic idea. |
Iron Wolf Saber
BetaMax.
2867
|
Posted - 2013.02.12 13:05:00 -
[39] - Quote
Does he know that there is a Dust CSM 0... |
Kain Spero
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
906
|
Posted - 2013.02.12 13:33:00 -
[40] - Quote
The Black Jackal wrote:I disagrre wholeheartedly that DUST needs it's own CSM... We need to be represented as a single Universe.
One War / One Universe.
CCP goals, full steam ahead. We may be separate games, but it's not the GAME itself that the CSM represents. It's the universe, and we co-exist with the Capsuleers in New Eden.
I disagree completely. Moving forward Dust will need its own CSM or Council of Planetary Management if you will.
Yes, it is one universe, but these are two games that need to be able to exist and stand on there own two feet as separate entities while the connection between them grows over time. This will take time and needs to be done with careful but bold steps to ensure that both games benefit from their interaction.
There needs to be an Eve CSM and a DUST CPM.
The CSM is a stakeholder and a key part in the development process and there are unique development teams for each game. I don't think anyone wants a bunch of Eve voters able to push their own agenda on to Dust just as I sure as hell wouldn't want a flood of Dust voters who will likely outnumber EVERY Eve pilot picking all of the CSM positions. That is a recipe for disaster. One of the CSM's main goals is to ensure that developer resources are being put to what the Eve community wants because through their subscriptions they have invested and become partners in Eve's future.
The CSM is the guardian of serious internet spaceship business and there needs to be a Dust equivalent that doesn't have it's community voice watered down by votes from Eve. |
|
Iron Wolf Saber
BetaMax.
2867
|
Posted - 2013.02.12 13:39:00 -
[41] - Quote
^ This guy among others are part of the 0 group, its not elected though all voulenteer work.
While some on the board so far are eve players, most of them identify themselves more as dust 514 player than their former. |
Captain-Awesome
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
349
|
Posted - 2013.02.12 13:42:00 -
[42] - Quote
hello, if you are serious about your candidacy, please read this - it will be of great use to you :)
https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=545858&post545858 |
Mavado V Noriega
SyNergy Gaming
2283
|
Posted - 2013.02.12 14:01:00 -
[43] - Quote
Kain Spero wrote:The Black Jackal wrote:I disagrre wholeheartedly that DUST needs it's own CSM... We need to be represented as a single Universe.
One War / One Universe.
CCP goals, full steam ahead. We may be separate games, but it's not the GAME itself that the CSM represents. It's the universe, and we co-exist with the Capsuleers in New Eden. I disagree completely. Moving forward Dust will need its own CSM or Council of Planetary Management if you will. Yes, it is one universe, but these are two games that need to be able to exist and stand on there own two feet as separate entities while the connection between them grows over time. This will take time and needs to be done with careful but bold steps to ensure that both games benefit from their interaction. There needs to be an Eve CSM and a DUST CPM. The CSM is a stakeholder and a key part in the development process and there are unique development teams for each game. I don't think anyone wants a bunch of Eve voters able to push their own agenda on to Dust just as I sure as hell wouldn't want a flood of Dust voters who will likely outnumber EVERY Eve pilot picking all of the CSM positions. That is a recipe for disaster. One of the CSM's main goals is to ensure that developer resources are being put to what the Eve community wants because through their subscriptions they have invested and become partners in Eve's future. The CSM is the guardian of serious internet spaceship business and there needs to be a Dust equivalent that doesn't have it's community voice watered down by votes from Eve.
ty for expanding on my point kain. didnt feel like typing out an essay
|
The Black Jackal
The Southern Legion
302
|
Posted - 2013.02.12 15:24:00 -
[44] - Quote
Kain Spero wrote:Yes, it is one universe, but these are two games that need to be able to exist and stand on there own two feet as separate entities while the connection between them grows over time. This will take time and needs to be done with careful but bold steps to ensure that both games benefit from their interaction.
The CSM represents the playerbase of New Eden. Not the singular EVE-side. The only reason it is viewed as such, is that EVE players have been (up until now) the SOLE inhabitants of New Eden.
The Integration, as stated in my platform, is a process that requires a SINGLE voice. A unified Council. The CSM is already established, and already has direct contcat with CCP, and the integration of DUST was discussed at the summit meetings, and over Skype in great debates. With no DUST representatives taking part.
The reason this game IS so unique is that it interacts directly with the established world of EVE Online and New Eden. If you 'limit' that interaction by creating a separate council that ONLY interacts with the EVE CSM on integration, you'll have 3 series of debates that will not align. A SINGLE vision is the way of the future., Bringing the games closer together will ensure that DUST gets the attention it Deserves, the impact on New Eden it Deserves, as well as EVE having those same impacts on DUST. Yet having these impacts as 'optional' for the majority of the playerbase so as not to make each dependant on the other. but rather an additional asset to be used.
Forming our own council seems like a great idea, and IF it were able to gain us equality to the EVE CSM, I would be all for it. But if the CSM is left to represent New Eden's 'paying' customers... they will win in the EVE Vs. DUST debates.
Having a Representative on the CSM will ensure that Interaction is tempered, and comprimised with EVE players on their levels. |
Iron Wolf Saber
BetaMax.
2867
|
Posted - 2013.02.12 15:30:00 -
[45] - Quote
The Black Jackal wrote:Kain Spero wrote:Yes, it is one universe, but these are two games that need to be able to exist and stand on there own two feet as separate entities while the connection between them grows over time. This will take time and needs to be done with careful but bold steps to ensure that both games benefit from their interaction.
The CSM represents the playerbase of New Eden. Not the singular EVE-side. The only reason it is viewed as such, is that EVE players have been (up until now) the SOLE inhabitants of New Eden. The Integration, as stated in my platform, is a process that requires a SINGLE voice. A unified Council. The CSM is already established, and already has direct contcat with CCP, and the integration of DUST was discussed at the summit meetings, and over Skype in great debates. With no DUST representatives taking part. The reason this game IS so unique is that it interacts directly with the established world of EVE Online and New Eden. If you 'limit' that interaction by creating a separate council that ONLY interacts with the EVE CSM on integration, you'll have 3 series of debates that will not align. A SINGLE vision is the way of the future., Bringing the games closer together will ensure that DUST gets the attention it Deserves, the impact on New Eden it Deserves, as well as EVE having those same impacts on DUST. Yet having these impacts as 'optional' for the majority of the playerbase so as not to make each dependant on the other. but rather an additional asset to be used. Forming our own council seems like a great idea, and IF it were able to gain us equality to the EVE CSM, I would be all for it. But if the CSM is left to represent New Eden's 'paying' customers... they will win in the EVE Vs. DUST debates. Having a Representative on the CSM will ensure that Interaction is tempered, and comprimised with EVE players on their levels.
I, among many, refuse to yield to the spaceship internet overlords.
Dust's 'council of planetary management' would if are more likely to fly to shanghai and not ice land to meet with the developers. We need players to represent dust players, who are dust players and are very much fps/mmorpg players.
You see the difference between 'our' best elected csm representative, Hans, and you is that he is more of an ambassador. He knows our game enough and shares our frustration that if we had to choose a guy to fly from the csm to fly to shanghai and not Iceland he'd be it. You can stay in Iceland we don't want you, you rub off the very wrong way.
The other reason why so many here are not taking you seriously is lack of clout. This is literally the first day anyone has heard of you in a major way. You have yet to build any verses some one like myself, who is among probably the closest thing to the current 'CSM' Dust 514 has. There are other influential out there that browse the forums, stalk twitter and Facebook, do all the pod casts. Taking as many player concerns as possible and present them to the developers when possible allowed during interviews, short breaks, or highly well constructed posts.
Also run spell checker at least to reduce message loss.
'CPM 0' is already in session BTW stop missing the meetings if you're that serious. |
Preacher Death 2
IMPSwarm Negative-Feedback
20
|
Posted - 2013.02.12 16:30:00 -
[46] - Quote
The Black Jackal wrote:More variety in PvE in DUST 514 and EVE Online - DUST-side Missions similar to Campaign-modes (miniaturized) in other games. With diverging outcomes based on actions. More EVE-side mission varieties, with new types such as 'escort'.
I'll vote for you if you push for some Sansha zombie missions. |
Iron Wolf Saber
BetaMax.
2867
|
Posted - 2013.02.12 16:49:00 -
[47] - Quote
Preacher Death 2 wrote:The Black Jackal wrote:More variety in PvE in DUST 514 and EVE Online - DUST-side Missions similar to Campaign-modes (miniaturized) in other games. With diverging outcomes based on actions. More EVE-side mission varieties, with new types such as 'escort'. I'll vote for you if you push for some Sansha zombie missions.
CSM really does not work like that. Read all the previous csm minutes you'll see why running like this does every little.
While I have my own platforms I will not be posting them here, that's already more disrespectful than me already trying to cut him off at the legs. |
Nova Knife
Seituoda Taskforce Command Caldari State
788
|
Posted - 2013.02.12 18:00:00 -
[48] - Quote
Same thing as Kain said.
Don't run for Eve CSM. Join others in pushing for Dust to get its own body.
The Eve CSM is there for eve related issues. Having a split council is silly and detracts from the entire point of it. A body for each game ensures each game is represented properly to the separate studios making the games, as opposed to trying to bunch together people for both games on one council and having valuable viewpoints on either side lost or skewed as a result.
Let the Eve CSM go to Iceland to talk about Eve and batphone the dust group on Lync if subjects regarding the link are being discussed, and vice versa.
It may be One Universe//One War, but we're still Two Games//Two balls of wax.
|
Maximus Stryker
Villore Sec Ops Gallente Federation
393
|
Posted - 2013.02.12 18:14:00 -
[49] - Quote
What about having two separate bodies with each body nominating one of its members to simultaneously serve on the other body to represent that body's opinions...ie CSM & CPM with one person from CSM serving on the CPM board and one person from the CPM serving on the CSM board.
|
Iron Wolf Saber
BetaMax.
2867
|
Posted - 2013.02.12 18:30:00 -
[50] - Quote
Maximus Stryker wrote:What about having two separate bodies with each body nominating one of its members to simultaneously serve on the other body to represent that body's opinions...ie CSM & CPM with one person from CSM serving on the CPM board and one person from the CPM serving on the CSM board.
Aye, we discussed having amabassadors, one dust cpm flies to iceland one csm flies to shanghai. and whatever cycle of meets between the two groups would be frequent. |
|
Captain-Awesome
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
349
|
Posted - 2013.02.12 18:36:00 -
[51] - Quote
www.dustCPM.tk people. |
Iron Wolf Saber
BetaMax.
2867
|
Posted - 2013.02.12 21:44:00 -
[52] - Quote
https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=53977
Jackal Read Heed and Consider |
The Black Jackal
The Southern Legion
302
|
Posted - 2013.02.13 00:11:00 -
[53] - Quote
I respect what you guys are doing with the unofficial CPM, I really do.
But I will contune my assertation that as a single Universe, as CCP has stated (A Single Universe viewed through 2 windows.) REQUIRES a single Entity to represent the players. Such as to bring the two communities together under a single banner, rather than segregate them further. A secondary council is segreating the communities, making it "DUST 514 or EVE Online", whereas I'm trying to make it "DUST 514 AND EVE Online".
On the note of gaining the 'respect' of CCP and the playerbase. You highlight the struggles of establishing the first CSM, the fact that players didn't take it seriously, and that slowly over time, they've finally attained the status of a true stakeholder in New Eden. Would you really want to go and create another structure and repeat history again? Not to mention that with the framework already in place, it's better to work within the existing system than create a new one that will likely end up subordinate to the older more 'established' system.
The CSM represents the playerbase... Just look at the December Minutes... though not published as yet, there is a whole 2 part section on DUST / EVE Integration. With no true DUST representative there, how do you think the ideas were portayed? In favour of DUST? Or EVE?
That is what I want to represent on behalf of the DUST Community. I want to help guide the development of DUST / EVE Link via a position on the CSM so that BOTH parties are happy with the outcome, and the integration is not one sided, depite DUST 514 being a free-to-play game.
Utilising existing infrastructure means we can gain that communication straight away.
Bringing THIS community into the greater community of New Eden will ensure that we exceed the so-called 'shelf-like' of most FPS games. Alienating ourselves from the greater community will ensure this great game swiftly follows the demise of MAG, and so many other great FPS games as 'just another shooter'.
|
Mavado V Noriega
SyNergy Gaming
2283
|
Posted - 2013.02.13 00:30:00 -
[54] - Quote
lol ur pretty stubborn tbh i already said when matters for the EVE//DUST link needs to be discussed CCP should sit down with BOTH CSMs to discuss the matter not leave it up to one or 2 ppl to talk for the ENTIRE community of DUST players
YES we are one universe BUT there are two SEPERATE games why cant u see that there are 2 dev teams working on the 2 games.
Not everything discussed by the CSM is always gonna be about the link. Game balance, expansions etc etc will be discussed so sorry but ur not really posing a strong claim to having one.
Also on top of being stubborn about ppls suggestions u also do not have a strong presence within the community. I honestly never see u posting feedback on topics to better the game for us DUST mercs yet the CSM voting thing comes along and i see this thread on why WE as a community should throw their support behind someone who has done almost nothing really when it comes to providing CCP with feedback and ideas to BETTER the game for the community of DUST mercs. |
The Black Jackal
The Southern Legion
302
|
Posted - 2013.02.13 00:45:00 -
[55] - Quote
Mavado V Noriega wrote:lol ur pretty stubborn tbh i already said when matters for the EVE//DUST link needs to be discussed CCP should sit down with BOTH CSMs to discuss the matter not leave it up to one or 2 ppl to talk for the ENTIRE community of DUST players
YES we are one universe BUT there are two SEPERATE games why cant u see that there are 2 dev teams working on the 2 games.
Not everything discussed by the CSM is always gonna be about the link. Game balance, expansions etc etc will be discussed so sorry but ur not really posing a strong claim to having one.
Also on top of being stubborn about ppls suggestions u also do not have a strong presence within the community. I honestly never see u posting feedback on topics to better the game for us DUST mercs yet the CSM voting thing comes along and i see this thread on why WE as a community should throw their support behind someone who has done almost nothing really when it comes to providing CCP with feedback and ideas to BETTER the game for the community of DUST mercs.
My platform is my feedback, it's what I want to accomplish. And if providing feedback is respnding to hundreds of 'this is OP' claims that are then argued into oblivion, or buggy game mechanics that I have never experienced (despite efforts to duplicate them during my own games) what can I say but.
"Oh, I can't get the game to bug out on me like that..."
Reposting issues that have been posted scores of times does nothing but break CCPs Forums rules, and using the Search Function I've read opinions, fixes, bug reports a tonne on anything my Corp Mates have experienced, or simply people in Local.
I've established an Academy to get people from DUST who want to try EVE in a friendly, informative environment without the hassle of Faction Warfare hanging over them, teaching them how to play EVE, as well and how to integrate (OBs).
Read my platform, my 'feedback and requests' are contained in there. Some refinement may be nessesary, but It's there.
When you discuss the 'meetings' between the CSM and alleged CPM, who do you honestly think will come out on top in these discussions? CCP is a business, and respectfully, they would have to come down on the side of their subscribers whom, over the past decade, have been their income.
Also, in point of fact, voting in a DUST-based system without some restriction of Real Money Investment, is just a excercise in futility. As stated in one of my threads, creating new PSN accounts is as easy as making a new E-Mail, so theoretically hundreds of votes could be cast by a single person if there is no CCP implemented control, and 'appointing' people to this CPM is just as bad, as these 'appointed people' were not nominated, no nominee list I have seen yet. I have seen "^ This is a member of the CPM 0", and "Stop missing the meetings", but when, where are these meetings? IRC? During times that I, in UTC +11 Time zones cannot attend due to work / family commitments?
No vote and nomination = no true representation, and no voting can be considered fair if you can vote for 'free'. |
ZiwZih
Tritan-Industries Legacy Rising
54
|
Posted - 2013.02.13 03:43:00 -
[56] - Quote
While having a DUST representative in CSM 8 might be all well and nice, by your replys I think you definately should not be ours.
You, for reasons that suit you, keep insisting on DUST/EVE relation being the question of all questions. You even give us example of how is EVE represented in CSM by sectors like 0.0, WH, FW, etc. and treat DUST as one of these which should then take one or two places on the board, not caring for the fact that DUST, while shares same physical space, has (will have) its own gameplay in those mentioned sectors.
Also your personality is a bit problematic, as here comes notorious question 'Who are you?' Beside nice wishes and common places written in platform I am clueless (and I guess many other) on what and who you stand for. You forget that this game is young and we do not have 10 years old community with all developed social connections to easy track someone even if we never heard about him -- this also means that insisting on voting as a must for first few CPMs is not really necessary -- those who work most with and for community will come up and be part of it (even if it is un/semiofficial, it is good enough to communicate with the Shanghai team.)
CPM after all doesn't have to be simple replica of CSM.
Etc, etc. Lastly, after these three pages I can conclude your lack of 'ears' for the community and I would rather have none than such representative. Otherwise wish you all the best. |
The Black Jackal
The Southern Legion
302
|
Posted - 2013.02.13 04:47:00 -
[57] - Quote
ZiwZih wrote:While having a DUST representative in CSM 8 might be all well and nice, by your replys I think you definately should not be ours.
You, for reasons that suit you, keep insisting on DUST/EVE relation being the question of all questions. You even give us example of how is EVE represented in CSM by sectors like 0.0, WH, FW, etc. and treat DUST as one of these which should then take one or two places on the board, not caring for the fact that DUST, while shares same physical space, has (will have) its own gameplay in those mentioned sectors.
Also your personality is a bit problematic, as here comes notorious question 'Who are you?' Beside nice wishes and common places written in platform I am clueless (and I guess many other) on what and who you stand for. You forget that this game is young and we do not have 10 years old community with all developed social connections to easy track someone even if we never heard about him -- this also means that insisting on voting as a must for first few CPMs is not really necessary -- those who work most with and for community will come up and be part of it (even if it is un/semiofficial, it is good enough to communicate with the Shanghai team.)
CPM after all doesn't have to be simple replica of CSM.
Etc, etc. Lastly, after these three pages I can conclude your lack of 'ears' for the community and I would rather have none than such representative. Otherwise wish you all the best.
I'd like to know what 'reasons that suit me' you hold up there. I'm pushing for integration for the community. Do you want an active say in what happens to this game in an official capacity? The community, becasue it shares the same universe in Real Time, should be more integrated. These, while benefiting me (because I am also a part of the community) cannot be discounted as benefitting the entire community. More integration = more community staying power = better chance of game's survival and not dwindling to a few fanatical players (likely myself included) who deperately hang onto a game that the community abandoned because it was not 'included'.
"Who am I?" Well if you looked at my platform, previous posts, etc. You'd know what I stand for. By my replies in this very thread, you'd know what I stand for. I'm known to alot of people in-game, as well and some of the greater New Eden Community. I've co-hosted on Podside multiple times now, and love doing so. Discussing EVE, DUST and their Integration and CSM news.
Inclusion in the existing framework is one of many ways this game will survive. The self-appointed CPM is doing a great job of bringing gameplay issues to light, and I commend them, and continue to commend them for doing that. But it doesn't bring the two communities together. CCPs vision for DUST has always been One Universe // One War, and that includes one community, one voice. It's just two different ways of looking at, and interacting with this great universe we have. |
zeek1227 zeek1227
Blitzkrieg Co.
146
|
Posted - 2013.02.13 05:01:00 -
[58] - Quote
The Black Jackal wrote:ZiwZih wrote:While having a DUST representative in CSM 8 might be all well and nice, by your replys I think you definately should not be ours.
You, for reasons that suit you, keep insisting on DUST/EVE relation being the question of all questions. You even give us example of how is EVE represented in CSM by sectors like 0.0, WH, FW, etc. and treat DUST as one of these which should then take one or two places on the board, not caring for the fact that DUST, while shares same physical space, has (will have) its own gameplay in those mentioned sectors.
Also your personality is a bit problematic, as here comes notorious question 'Who are you?' Beside nice wishes and common places written in platform I am clueless (and I guess many other) on what and who you stand for. You forget that this game is young and we do not have 10 years old community with all developed social connections to easy track someone even if we never heard about him -- this also means that insisting on voting as a must for first few CPMs is not really necessary -- those who work most with and for community will come up and be part of it (even if it is un/semiofficial, it is good enough to communicate with the Shanghai team.)
CPM after all doesn't have to be simple replica of CSM.
Etc, etc. Lastly, after these three pages I can conclude your lack of 'ears' for the community and I would rather have none than such representative. Otherwise wish you all the best. I'd like to know what 'reasons that suit me' you hold up there. I'm pushing for integration for the community. Do you want an active say in what happens to this game in an official capacity? The community, becasue it shares the same universe in Real Time, should be more integrated. These, while benefiting me (because I am also a part of the community) cannot be discounted as benefitting the entire community. More integration = more community staying power = better chance of game's survival and not dwindling to a few fanatical players (likely myself included) who deperately hang onto a game that the community abandoned because it was not 'included'. "Who am I?" Well if you looked at my platform, previous posts, etc. You'd know what I stand for. By my replies in this very thread, you'd know what I stand for. I'm known to alot of people in-game, as well and some of the greater New Eden Community. I've co-hosted on Podside multiple times now, and love doing so. Discussing EVE, DUST and their Integration and CSM news. Inclusion in the existing framework is one of many ways this game will survive. The self-appointed CPM is doing a great job of bringing gameplay issues to light, and I commend them, and continue to commend them for doing that. But it doesn't bring the two communities together. CCPs vision for DUST has always been One Universe // One War, and that includes one community, one voice. It's just two different ways of looking at, and interacting with this great universe we have. Ive been playing since the beginning of closed beta and don't know who u are. This is the only post ive seen you on and I don't believe we've played together. U r also in a Corp I do not recognize. I'm not saying this would make you a bad candidate hut you need to get involved a bit more imho
Edit : again not saying u would be bad just I don't know you so maybe campaign elsewhere too so people like me recognize you and want you to represent us |
Tectonious Falcon
The Southern Legion
395
|
Posted - 2013.02.13 05:03:00 -
[59] - Quote
zeek1227 zeek1227 wrote:The Black Jackal wrote:ZiwZih wrote:While having a DUST representative in CSM 8 might be all well and nice, by your replys I think you definately should not be ours.
You, for reasons that suit you, keep insisting on DUST/EVE relation being the question of all questions. You even give us example of how is EVE represented in CSM by sectors like 0.0, WH, FW, etc. and treat DUST as one of these which should then take one or two places on the board, not caring for the fact that DUST, while shares same physical space, has (will have) its own gameplay in those mentioned sectors.
Also your personality is a bit problematic, as here comes notorious question 'Who are you?' Beside nice wishes and common places written in platform I am clueless (and I guess many other) on what and who you stand for. You forget that this game is young and we do not have 10 years old community with all developed social connections to easy track someone even if we never heard about him -- this also means that insisting on voting as a must for first few CPMs is not really necessary -- those who work most with and for community will come up and be part of it (even if it is un/semiofficial, it is good enough to communicate with the Shanghai team.)
CPM after all doesn't have to be simple replica of CSM.
Etc, etc. Lastly, after these three pages I can conclude your lack of 'ears' for the community and I would rather have none than such representative. Otherwise wish you all the best. I'd like to know what 'reasons that suit me' you hold up there. I'm pushing for integration for the community. Do you want an active say in what happens to this game in an official capacity? The community, becasue it shares the same universe in Real Time, should be more integrated. These, while benefiting me (because I am also a part of the community) cannot be discounted as benefitting the entire community. More integration = more community staying power = better chance of game's survival and not dwindling to a few fanatical players (likely myself included) who deperately hang onto a game that the community abandoned because it was not 'included'. "Who am I?" Well if you looked at my platform, previous posts, etc. You'd know what I stand for. By my replies in this very thread, you'd know what I stand for. I'm known to alot of people in-game, as well and some of the greater New Eden Community. I've co-hosted on Podside multiple times now, and love doing so. Discussing EVE, DUST and their Integration and CSM news. Inclusion in the existing framework is one of many ways this game will survive. The self-appointed CPM is doing a great job of bringing gameplay issues to light, and I commend them, and continue to commend them for doing that. But it doesn't bring the two communities together. CCPs vision for DUST has always been One Universe // One War, and that includes one community, one voice. It's just two different ways of looking at, and interacting with this great universe we have. Ive been playing since the beginning of closed beta and don't know who u are. This is the only post ive seen you on and I don't believe we've played together. U r also in a Corp I do not recognize. I'm not saying this would make you a bad candidate hut you need to get involved a bit more imho
I have no opinion on what's happening TBH, but you haven't seen him because he's Australian and if you'd been playing closed beta you would probably recognise our corp.
|
zeek1227 zeek1227
Blitzkrieg Co.
146
|
Posted - 2013.02.13 05:11:00 -
[60] - Quote
Tectonious Falcon wrote:
I have no opinion on what's happening TBH, but you haven't seen him because he's Australian and if you'd been playing closed beta you would probably recognise our corp.
I honestly do not reccognize it and I did play closed so yeah sorry |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |