Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 :: [one page] |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Vicx V
Circle of Huskarl Minmatar Republic
26
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 14:03:00 -
[1] - Quote
I was SO excited about this for months, I thought it would combine MAG and Battlefield into one epic game, best of all it would be free so there'd never be a lack of players.. but after a few hours of really trying to like this game, it fails miserably. I LOVE the depth of the dropsuit customization system, the market place and all the other details that allow you to customize your character to your needs, the MMO influence from Eve Online really shows in this regard.. but at the end of the day it's the gameplay that completely and utterly ******* SUCKS! It feels like an extremely budget version of MAG and Section 8 Prejudice combined, except it feels even MORE cheap and budget (in fact I feel like getting back into both of those games right now) The incredibly BLAND graphics, the lag, the multitude of weapons that all end up being small variations of eachother and all look and feel pretty much the same with minor RoF and damage attributes.. I could go on, but my point is, regardless of all the attention to detail in the customization, the game itself just simply licks the sweat off a dead donkey's dry salty ballsack.
It's no wonder they're charging $20 for the Mercenary Pack, because that's the most money they'll be able to extract from people who've yet to play the game. A majority of people will end up disgusted and only a small minority, even smaller than the niche gamers in MAG and S8P will stick with this game simply due to it being a free game and possibly out of pure boredom. Once the final product releases on PSN, people will download, try it out and most will never touch it again. That's the single biggest reason they released the Mercenary pack, to milk all the eager and optimistic and people who like me, think this game has huge potential.
Unless the gameplay is seriously overhalled FROM SCRATCH, this game will fail within months of release. The ONLY thing that'll keep this game alive in the long term is the fact that it's free, which will entice the players with the absolute lowest of standards and that market alone.
I sincerely wanted this game to conquer and succeed, but the fact is the gameplay just ain't fun.. although it has the scope and potential to be, it SO does! that's why I'm so genuinely disappointed.
So from me, goodbye and good riddance. |
ReGnUm DEl
Doomheim
622
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 14:07:00 -
[2] - Quote
Vicx V wrote:I was SO excited about this for months, I thought it would combine MAG and Battlefield into one epic game, best of all it would be free so there'd never be a lack of players.. but after a few hours of really trying to like this game, it fails miserably. I LOVE the depth of the dropsuit customization system, the market place and all the other details that allow you to customize your character to your needs, the MMO influence from Eve Online really shows in this regard.. but at the end of the day it's the gameplay that completely and utterly ******* SUCKS! It feels like an extremely budget version of MAG and Section 8 Prejudice combined, except it feels even MORE cheap and budget (in fact I feel like getting back into both of those games right now) The incredibly BLAND graphics, the lag, the multitude of weapons that all end up being small variations of eachother and all look and feel pretty much the same with minor RoF and damage attributes.. I could go on, but my point is, regardless of all the attention to detail in the customization, the game itself just simply licks the sweat off a dead donkey's dry salty ballsack.
It's no wonder they're charging $20 for the Mercenary Pack, because that's the most money they'll be able to extract from people who've yet to play the game. A majority of people will end up disgusted and only a small minority, even smaller than the niche gamers in MAG and S8P will stick with this game simply due to it being a free game and possibly out of pure boredom.
Unless the gameplay is seriously overhalled FROM SCRATCH, this game will fail within months of release. The ONLY thing that'll keep this game alive in the long term is the fact that it's free, which will entice the players with the absolute lowest of standards and that market alone.
I sincerely wanted this game to conquer and succeed, but the fact is the gameplay just ain't fun.. although it has the scope and potential to be, it SO does! that's why I'm so genuinely disappointed.
So from me, goodbye and good riddance.
THIS
ReGnUm APPROVED |
michael McG
Doomheim
28
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 14:09:00 -
[3] - Quote
you do realize that what you have played is only a fraction of the game. this is not the finished game. they are getting the fighting part of the game fixed. there is PVE and all sorts of othere parts that they are saving till the end. trust me i have been playing from the first beta were they only had biomass for the skirmish match. just come back when the game releases. plus ccp is not going under like MAGs did so you will still get content and if there are any problems let them know. The graphics art the last thing there worried about. I dont know if you have already done it but look at eve and the graphics will be thesame |
Gelan Corbaine
BetaMax.
103
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 14:09:00 -
[4] - Quote
/facepalm Seriously what do you people think the whole point of testing is ?!!!!! |
Garrett Blacknova
Codex Troopers
1849
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 14:16:00 -
[5] - Quote
You're right!
There's no way this OBVIOUS AND CLEARLY LABELED WORK IN PROGRESS can compete with AAA titles in its current state!
If I didn't know better, I'd almost suspect we're not playing the final release version of the game... OH WAIT. |
Obama DAT
Doomheim
389
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 14:18:00 -
[6] - Quote
WORK IN PROGRESS CLAP ClAP CLAP |
Sha Kharn Clone
Seraphim Initiative. CRONOS.
1087
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 14:21:00 -
[7] - Quote
This makes me sadface
Its the only FPS I gotz so I have nothing to compare it too but I'm loving it and cant wait till we have those long running skirmish maps that roll on from one objective to the next.
Tho this build does suck massive male chicken gibblets ...it will get better come back ...come back |
EnglishSnake
Zumari Force Projection Caldari State
1012
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 14:21:00 -
[8] - Quote
Graphics make a game good? lolno look at BF3 and that pile of shite which is constantly getting patched and made worse where its a twitch shooter to the max and everything else is made of paper
Also BETA WIP moron |
Vicx V
Circle of Huskarl Minmatar Republic
26
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 14:29:00 -
[9] - Quote
Gelan Corbaine wrote: /facepalm Seriously what do you people think the whole point of testing is ?!!!!! Garrett Blacknova wrote:You're right!
There's no way this OBVIOUS AND CLEARLY LABELED WORK IN PROGRESS can compete with AAA titles in its current state!
If I didn't know better, I'd almost suspect we're not playing the final release version of the game... OH WAIT. Obama DAT wrote:WORK IN PROGRESS CLAP ClAP CLAP YES! 'clap clap clap' yourselves for reacting emotionally like butthurt fanboys and ignoring my point, instead jumping straight to the "but it's still in testing derp!" response.
Even BEFORE you get to the beta testing stage, the seriously terrible gameplay would've been ringing alarm bells in ANYONE who had any decent experience with FPSs in the alpha stage. I know what beta is, and by the beta stage they know exactly what they're doing, so to see such terrible gameplay mechanics at this stage of development either means they either have no faith in their product or they'll just slaving away to break into the FPS market to supplement their EVE universe. It honestly makes no sense how it can be this bad at this later stage of development.
EnglishSnake wrote:Graphics make a game good? lolno look at BF3 and that pile of shite which is constantly getting patched and made worse where its a twitch shooter to the max and everything else is made of paper Yes BF3 does have a shitload of problems, but despite that at least the gameplay overall is SOLID and performs well, both on an infantry and vehicle aspect.
Sha Kharn Clone wrote:Its the only FPS I gotz so I have nothing to compare it too but I'm loving it and cant wait till we have those long running skirmish maps that roll on from one objective to the next. THIS is a perfect example of how I said in my first post that only the players with the absolute lowest of standards will be the ones still playing this in the long term, because they simply wouldn't know any better or just don't have any standards.
Seriously, stop taking this offensively, listen objectively, I'm trying to make a valid point that if taken seriously might improve the game. I'm not here to hurl random insults and mindless abuse, I do not troll. |
Tony Calif
Seraphim Initiative. CRONOS.
2002
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 14:29:00 -
[10] - Quote
This is the general consensus. I'm just happy the OP has bothered to come here, and post for our benefit before putting on something better. And all the fanboys say "wip, beta, not finished" How many people bothered to post before going to play other games instead. Atleast 9000 didnt |
|
Templar Two
Villore Sec Ops Gallente Federation
459
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 14:29:00 -
[11] - Quote
Work in progress or not there are things that can't be changed. After the alpha state what you can do is add, polish but not make the game anew! You can build over the foundation of VG but not change them; change them and you make another game entirely.
Re-designing the gameplay from scratch, as Vix says is probably impossible now. |
Renzo Kuken
Seraphim Initiative. CRONOS.
369
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 14:30:00 -
[12] - Quote
Vicx V wrote:I was SO excited about this for months, I thought it would combine MAG and Battlefield into one epic game, best of all it would be free so there'd never be a lack of players.. but after a few hours of really trying to like this game, it fails miserably. I LOVE the depth of the dropsuit customization system, the market place and all the other details that allow you to customize your character to your needs, the MMO influence from Eve Online really shows in this regard.. but at the end of the day it's the gameplay that completely and utterly ******* SUCKS! It feels like an extremely budget version of MAG and Section 8 Prejudice combined, except it feels even MORE cheap and budget (in fact I feel like getting back into both of those games right now) The incredibly BLAND graphics, the lag, the multitude of weapons that all end up being small variations of eachother and all look and feel pretty much the same with minor RoF and damage attributes.. I could go on, but my point is, regardless of all the attention to detail in the customization, the game itself just simply licks the sweat off a dead donkey's dry salty ballsack.
It's no wonder they're charging $20 for the Mercenary Pack, because that's the most money they'll be able to extract from people who've yet to play the game. A majority of people will end up disgusted and only a small minority, even smaller than the niche gamers in MAG and S8P will stick with this game simply due to it being a free game and possibly out of pure boredom. Once the final product releases on PSN, people will download, try it out and most will never touch it again. That's the single biggest reason they released the Mercenary pack, to milk all the eager and optimistic and people who like me, think this game has huge potential.
Unless the gameplay is seriously overhalled FROM SCRATCH, this game will fail within months of release. The ONLY thing that'll keep this game alive in the long term is the fact that it's free, which will entice the players with the absolute lowest of standards and that market alone.
I sincerely wanted this game to conquer and succeed, but the fact is the gameplay just ain't fun.. although it has the scope and potential to be, it SO does! that's why I'm so genuinely disappointed.
So from me, goodbye and good riddance. hey moron the game is in its second build...what part of work in progress do you not understand??? |
Sojuro Ryo
Zumari Force Projection Caldari State
189
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 14:33:00 -
[13] - Quote
The less whinny kids there are the better the gaming will be. |
Grizl Takus
13
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 14:33:00 -
[14] - Quote
Well first of all it's a closed beta not even open yet, the graphics have been downsized so that there is not a lot more to download, they have said that there would be different looking guns and actually I bought the Merc Pack after I played the beta weekend because I wanted to keep playing because I loved this game so much. If you don't like the game that's fine, your're entitled to your opinion but how about you save it until the game is actually done and finished. Okay? Thank you. |
EnglishSnake
Zumari Force Projection Caldari State
1012
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 14:34:00 -
[15] - Quote
'Yes BF3 does have a shitload of problems, but despite that at least the gameplay overall is SOLID and performs well, both on an infantry and vehicle aspect.'
How is BF3 solid gameplay its a twitch shooter with every gun having a stupid amount of recoil and patches which add recoil when you add a foregrip
Also vehicles suck since they are made out of paper and are useless after 1 hit by an RPG |
Marluk Visconti
Wormhole Exploration Crew R.E.P.O.
6
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 14:35:00 -
[16] - Quote
What, specifically, is wrong with the gameplay, in your opinion?
How could it be "overhauled"?
What constructive changes could be made to the existing game environment? |
Benjamin Hellios
Villore Sec Ops Gallente Federation
259
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 14:37:00 -
[17] - Quote
Vicx V wrote: the game itself just simply licks the sweat off a dead donkey's dry salty ballsack.
Wonderful, absolutely wonderful.
I still have high hopes for this game however recently I saw Alpha footage of another game, which looked heaps better than this beta so I'm beginning to wonder. I'm just curious if they're going to able to improve on pretty much everything we see now or if they're just going to keep adding more stuff to the, pardon me, mediocrity.
Will the physics really change all that much? How much will the textures and graphics be improved? Will the things we saw in the 2009 footage still be in this game? It's already been proven that you can indeed polish a turd but it takes a lot of hard work and dedication to make it smooth and shiny. I know there's people from DICE working on this game, but so far their presence hasn't really been noticed in the actual gun mechanics.
Like I said, I still have high hopes for this game, I'm just genuinely curious if they'll be able to pull it off. |
Sojuro Ryo
Zumari Force Projection Caldari State
189
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 14:38:00 -
[18] - Quote
Vicx V wrote: THIS is a perfect example of how I said in my first post that only the players with the absolute lowest of standards will be the ones still playing this in the long term, because they simply wouldn't know any better or just don't have any standards.
Seriously, stop taking this offensively, listen objectively, I'm trying to make a valid point that if taken seriously might improve the game. I'm not here to hurl random insults and mindless abuse, I do not troll.
You can go back to playing CoD with the other little kids and let the grownups play the real games. No one is being offensive except for you. You're complaining like this is a finished game but yet...it's not. |
JaZZa01
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
81
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 14:38:00 -
[19] - Quote
Lmao, look at all these fanboys. When somebody says something bad, it's like a child responding with their hands over their ears, "NO NO, BETA, LA LA LA, DUST IS PERFECT."
+1 to OP. Game won't change. Release will just have more skills and items. Gameplay overhaul as Templar stated, is impossible. Partly because CCP don't know what they're doing, but mostly the moronic fanbase that enjoys half-assed mechanics already has a foothold. |
Alkai Chromision
Circle of Huskarl Minmatar Republic
7
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 14:40:00 -
[20] - Quote
Unfortunately I have to agree with the original poster. An excellent idea and very ambitious project that I have to commend the developers for attempting ultimately falls very short. I desperately wanted to like this game as well. I was looking very forward to it and even willing to buy the "aesthetic" purchase items that were supposed to give me a different look like I was made to believe initially, not make me overpowered.
On top of the things mentioned by the OP, here are a FEW more things i've noted (but by no means all):
This will be pay to win despite the claims that it won't be. People who pay will have distinct and notable advantages that will inherently discourage other players.
The market "consume one of everything every time you spawn" model is broken. It's frustrating to instantly lose tons of equipment through spawn trapping that can occur or any other reason. Typically you don't live very long. Maybe use use a time based system. You have said items for 30mins or an hour in game time and then it expires.
Spawn traps at beacons....
In my experience the damage model seems to be taken from the worst of COD.
Drop ships are overpowered.
Missle spam from any and everything that can shoot missles.
People always say do you realize your playing a beta? Yes. Do you realize how complete a beta actually is?
Definition: A trial of machinery, software, or other products, in the final stages of its development, carried out by a party unconnected with its development.
Typically the last test, final test, etc of a commercial product. Betas are by and large what you see is what you get. Minor changes will be made afterwards. In definition and in my experiences. There will be no magical 180 degree change into the right direction, this is all there is. The only option would be to do as Final Fantasy 14 has done and go back into development (for ps3 anyway) and push the release back a few years. It's a sad, unpolished unenjoyable game at the end of the day that i've deleted and will not be supporting any further. A nice waste of $20.
|
|
Templar Two
Villore Sec Ops Gallente Federation
459
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 14:41:00 -
[21] - Quote
Benjamin Hellios wrote: ..I saw Alpha footage of another game, which looked heaps better than this beta...
I believe I know what is the game you are talking about. |
Mo Gallas Gentralde
Crux Special Tasks Group Gallente Federation
178
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 14:43:00 -
[22] - Quote
Vicx V wrote: The incredibly BLAND graphics, the lag, the multitude of weapons that all end up being small variations of eachother and all look and feel pretty much the same with minor RoF and damage attributes.. I could go on, but my point is, regardless of all the attention to detail in the customization, the game itself just simply licks the sweat off a dead donkey's dry salty ballsack.
Dude... if all you want is "shiny graphics" go watch the demos... again...and again...and again. I'd take a game with deep complexity any day over a Vapid game made only for VISUALS.
So many gamers are simply towed around by their eyeballs like a donkey after that Carrot-On-A-Stick. As soon as it take a little bit for them to stop and think about something, suddenly they're scared witless because the shiny graphics can't save them anymore...
Vicx V wrote:
It's no wonder they're charging $20 for the Mercenary Pack, because that's the most money they'll be able to extract from people who've yet to play the game. A majority of people will end up disgusted and only a small minority, even smaller than the niche gamers in MAG and S8P will stick with this game simply due to it being a free game and possibly out of pure boredom. Once the final product releases on PSN, people will download, try it out and most will never touch it again. That's the single biggest reason they released the Mercenary pack, to milk all the eager and optimistic and people who like me, think this game has huge potential.
Unless the gameplay is seriously overhalled FROM SCRATCH, this game will fail within months of release. The ONLY thing that'll keep this game alive in the long term is the fact that it's free, which will entice the players with the absolute lowest of standards and that market alone.
Its a Beta.. meaning ITS ALWAYS BEING OVERHAULED FROM SCRATCH. Of course some people don't like to think, as documented in prior quote. Not to mention this segment again:
Vicx V wrote: this game will fail within months of release. The ONLY thing that'll keep this game alive in the long term is the fact that it's free You just said "This game will fail, because it will succeed." If a game stays alive, it's economically sound. If a game is economically sound, that means it has succeeded.
Vicx V wrote:I was SO excited about this for months, I thought it would combine MAG and Battlefield into one epic game, best of all it would be free so there'd never be a lack of players.. but after a few hours of really trying to like this game, it fails miserably. I LOVE the depth of the dropsuit customization system, the market place and all the other details that allow you to customize your character to your needs, the MMO influence from Eve Online really shows in this regard.. but at the end of the day it's the gameplay that completely and utterly ******* SUCKS! It feels like an extremely budget version of MAG and Section 8 Prejudice combined, except it feels even MORE cheap and budget (in fact I feel like getting back into both of those games right now)
I sincerely wanted this game to conquer and succeed, but the fact is the gameplay just ain't fun.. although it has the scope and potential to be, it SO does! that's why I'm so genuinely disappointed.
So from me, goodbye and good riddance.
Definition of BETA: You ask other people to test things REPETITIVELY so you can figure out what is broken or needs to be changed.
You're basically telling everyone here that you came and "didn't want to test things repetitively". Why in the world did you sign up for a BETA then? Seriously? You're complaining that YOU chose to do something. We are not being given everything at once, because they need a good quantity of data on the items they give us before they drop a new one on the field. That means we're going to be doing the same things over... and over... and over again.
It's kind of like volunteering to work at a Zoo, then breaking down hysterically because there are too many people around you pointing at animals. |
Sojuro Ryo
Zumari Force Projection Caldari State
189
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 14:45:00 -
[23] - Quote
JaZZa01 wrote:Lmao, look at all these fanboys. When somebody says something bad, it's like a child responding with their hands over their ears, "NO NO, BETA, LA LA LA, DUST IS PERFECT."
+1 to OP. Game won't change. Release will just have more skills and items. Gameplay overhaul as Templar stated, is impossible. Partly because CCP don't know what they're doing, but mostly the moronic fanbase that enjoys half-assed mechanics already has a foothold.
No one is saying it's perfect. We're just saying don't complain about it as if it were released. If you truly thin the way you do then why are you here wasting our space? Just leave and be done with it. Constructive criticism is good but whining is childish. CCP didn't put up a sub-forum called Feedback/Requests for nothing. |
Vicx V
Circle of Huskarl Minmatar Republic
26
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 14:46:00 -
[24] - Quote
Renzo Kuken wrote:hey moron the game is in its second build...what part of work in progress do you not understand??? Read my 2nd post this time. Being in it's second build gives me even less faith, it shows that they're fully aware of what they've created. At this rate it'll take many MANY builds before this game is up to par.
Grizl Takus wrote:Well first of all it's a closed beta not even open yet, the graphics have been downsized so that there is not a lot more to download, they have said that there would be different looking guns and actually I bought the Merc Pack after I played the beta weekend because I wanted to keep playing because I loved this game so much. If you don't like the game that's fine, your're entitled to your opinion but how about you save it until the game is actually done and finished. Okay? Thank you. Thanks Captain Obvious. It's not just an opinion, it's called constructive criticism, I think 90% of the people here don't understand that. I'm raising these points now BEFORE it is done because by then it'll be too late to overhaul the seriously flawed state it's in now.
Sojuro Ryo wrote:You can go back to playing CoD with the other little kids and let the grownups play the real games. No one is being offensive except for you. You're complaining like this is a finished game but yet...it's not. LOL no one is being offensive? read all these posts, even YOU are calling me a "little kid." This is the mentality of people who cannot look at themselves honestly and acknowledge ANY form of constructive criticism, instead taking it way too personally.. sigh. |
Alkai Chromision
Circle of Huskarl Minmatar Republic
7
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 14:47:00 -
[25] - Quote
JaZZa01 wrote:Lmao, look at all these fanboys. When somebody says something bad, it's like a child responding with their hands over their ears, "NO NO, BETA, LA LA LA, DUST IS PERFECT."
+1 to OP. Game won't change. Release will just have more skills and items. Gameplay overhaul as Templar stated, is impossible. Partly because CCP don't know what they're doing, but mostly the moronic fanbase that enjoys half-assed mechanics already has a foothold.
Well said. As well as the OP. You people are taking everything offensively when this should be more of a collaborative effort to identify flaws and attempt to improve a lackluster game into what it could have and should have been. |
Grizl Takus
13
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 14:49:00 -
[26] - Quote
Vicx V wrote: the game itself just simply licks the sweat off a dead donkey's dry salty ballsack.
I
That's constructive?
|
Sojuro Ryo
Zumari Force Projection Caldari State
189
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 14:51:00 -
[27] - Quote
Vicx V wrote:Renzo Kuken wrote:hey moron the game is in its second build...what part of work in progress do you not understand??? Read my 2nd post this time. Being in it's second build gives me even less faith, it shows that they're fully aware of what they've created. At this rate it'll take many MANY builds before this game is up to par. Grizl Takus wrote:Well first of all it's a closed beta not even open yet, the graphics have been downsized so that there is not a lot more to download, they have said that there would be different looking guns and actually I bought the Merc Pack after I played the beta weekend because I wanted to keep playing because I loved this game so much. If you don't like the game that's fine, your're entitled to your opinion but how about you save it until the game is actually done and finished. Okay? Thank you. Thanks Captain Obvious. It's not just an opinion, it's called constructive criticism, I think 90% of the people here don't understand that. I'm raising these points now BEFORE it is done because by then it'll be too late to overhaul the seriously flawed state it's in now. Sojuro Ryo wrote:You can go back to playing CoD with the other little kids and let the grownups play the real games. No one is being offensive except for you. You're complaining like this is a finished game but yet...it's not. LOL no one is being offensive? read all these posts, even YOU are calling me a "little kid." This is the mentality of people who cannot look at themselves honestly and acknowledge ANY form of constructive criticism, instead taking it way too personally.. sigh.
I'm calling a you little kid because you're whining about a game that's in closed testing like it's live. You should do a little research on how game testing is done before attempting to do another beta test. |
Templar Two
Villore Sec Ops Gallente Federation
459
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 14:52:00 -
[28] - Quote
I made threads with consecutive criticism, proposing and detailing solutions but I was insulted and ignored nonetheless! |
Darky SI
232
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 14:53:00 -
[29] - Quote
The current shooting mechanics sucks there is no doubt but since we are in a beta there is hope it would be fixed and nailed |
ALM1GHTY STATIUS
138
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 14:53:00 -
[30] - Quote
ReGnUm DEl wrote:Vicx V wrote:I was SO excited about this for months, I thought it would combine MAG and Battlefield into one epic game, best of all it would be free so there'd never be a lack of players.. but after a few hours of really trying to like this game, it fails miserably. I LOVE the depth of the dropsuit customization system, the market place and all the other details that allow you to customize your character to your needs, the MMO influence from Eve Online really shows in this regard.. but at the end of the day it's the gameplay that completely and utterly ******* SUCKS! It feels like an extremely budget version of MAG and Section 8 Prejudice combined, except it feels even MORE cheap and budget (in fact I feel like getting back into both of those games right now) The incredibly BLAND graphics, the lag, the multitude of weapons that all end up being small variations of eachother and all look and feel pretty much the same with minor RoF and damage attributes.. I could go on, but my point is, regardless of all the attention to detail in the customization, the game itself just simply licks the sweat off a dead donkey's dry salty ballsack.
It's no wonder they're charging $20 for the Mercenary Pack, because that's the most money they'll be able to extract from people who've yet to play the game. A majority of people will end up disgusted and only a small minority, even smaller than the niche gamers in MAG and S8P will stick with this game simply due to it being a free game and possibly out of pure boredom.
Unless the gameplay is seriously overhalled FROM SCRATCH, this game will fail within months of release. The ONLY thing that'll keep this game alive in the long term is the fact that it's free, which will entice the players with the absolute lowest of standards and that market alone.
I sincerely wanted this game to conquer and succeed, but the fact is the gameplay just ain't fun.. although it has the scope and potential to be, it SO does! that's why I'm so genuinely disappointed.
So from me, goodbye and good riddance. THIS ReGnUm APPROVED
THIS
ALM1GHTY APPROVED |
|
ReGnUm DEl
Doomheim
622
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 14:54:00 -
[31] - Quote
Renzo Kuken wrote:Vicx V wrote:I was SO excited about this for months, I thought it would combine MAG and Battlefield into one epic game, best of all it would be free so there'd never be a lack of players.. but after a few hours of really trying to like this game, it fails miserably. I LOVE the depth of the dropsuit customization system, the market place and all the other details that allow you to customize your character to your needs, the MMO influence from Eve Online really shows in this regard.. but at the end of the day it's the gameplay that completely and utterly ******* SUCKS! It feels like an extremely budget version of MAG and Section 8 Prejudice combined, except it feels even MORE cheap and budget (in fact I feel like getting back into both of those games right now) The incredibly BLAND graphics, the lag, the multitude of weapons that all end up being small variations of eachother and all look and feel pretty much the same with minor RoF and damage attributes.. I could go on, but my point is, regardless of all the attention to detail in the customization, the game itself just simply licks the sweat off a dead donkey's dry salty ballsack.
It's no wonder they're charging $20 for the Mercenary Pack, because that's the most money they'll be able to extract from people who've yet to play the game. A majority of people will end up disgusted and only a small minority, even smaller than the niche gamers in MAG and S8P will stick with this game simply due to it being a free game and possibly out of pure boredom. Once the final product releases on PSN, people will download, try it out and most will never touch it again. That's the single biggest reason they released the Mercenary pack, to milk all the eager and optimistic and people who like me, think this game has huge potential.
Unless the gameplay is seriously overhalled FROM SCRATCH, this game will fail within months of release. The ONLY thing that'll keep this game alive in the long term is the fact that it's free, which will entice the players with the absolute lowest of standards and that market alone.
I sincerely wanted this game to conquer and succeed, but the fact is the gameplay just ain't fun.. although it has the scope and potential to be, it SO does! that's why I'm so genuinely disappointed.
So from me, goodbye and good riddance. hey moron the game is in its second build...what part of work in progress do you not understand???
third actually |
Iceyburnz
316
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 14:57:00 -
[32] - Quote
Vicx V wrote:I was SO excited about this for months...[stuff] So from me, goodbye and good riddance.
So instead of offering concise and construct ways to make the game better. You chose to offer non-sensical comparatives and throw your dummy out of the pram.
They really should have some kind of test before they let 'these people' onto the internet.
|
Grizl Takus
13
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 14:59:00 -
[33] - Quote
For those of you that want to make "constructive" posts how about you do so without saying how the game is destined to fail because when you say things like that it tends to make people who don't feel that way want to cuss you out and drive you off instead why don't you go post in the Feedback forum or do that little survey that CCP has up and then at the end type your concerns and feedback there in a polite way no: "This game is like licking a dead donkey's salty ball sack." Instead of saying stupid crap like that actually make a constructive post that someone will actually want to read and respond well too. |
Chihiro Itto
66
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 15:04:00 -
[34] - Quote
People who say they dislike a game then spend their time on that game's forums instead of doing something else with their lives make me larf. |
Garrett Blacknova
Codex Troopers
1849
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 15:04:00 -
[35] - Quote
ReGnUm DEl wrote:Renzo Kuken wrote:hey moron the game is in its second build...what part of work in progress do you not understand??? third actually And that's only counting beta builds, not pre-alpha builds or the first wave of in-house testing. |
Vicx V
Circle of Huskarl Minmatar Republic
26
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 15:09:00 -
[36] - Quote
Mo Gallas Gentralde wrote:Vicx V wrote: this game will fail within months of release. The ONLY thing that'll keep this game alive in the long term is the fact that it's free You just said "This game will fail, because it will succeed." If a game stays alive, it's economically sound. If a game is economically sound, that means it has succeeded. Vicx V wrote:I was SO excited about this for months, I thought it would combine MAG and Battlefield into one epic game, best of all it would be free so there'd never be a lack of players.. but after a few hours of really trying to like this game, it fails miserably. I LOVE the depth of the dropsuit customization system, the market place and all the other details that allow you to customize your character to your needs, the MMO influence from Eve Online really shows in this regard.. but at the end of the day it's the gameplay that completely and utterly ******* SUCKS! It feels like an extremely budget version of MAG and Section 8 Prejudice combined, except it feels even MORE cheap and budget (in fact I feel like getting back into both of those games right now)
I sincerely wanted this game to conquer and succeed, but the fact is the gameplay just ain't fun.. although it has the scope and potential to be, it SO does! that's why I'm so genuinely disappointed.
So from me, goodbye and good riddance. Definition of BETA: You ask other people to test things REPETITIVELY so you can figure out what is broken or needs to be changed. You're basically telling everyone here that you came and "didn't want to test things repetitively". Why in the world did you sign up for a BETA then? Seriously? You're complaining that YOU chose to do something. We are not being given everything at once, because they need a good quantity of data on the items they give us before they drop a new one on the field. That means we're going to be doing the same things over... and over... and over again.
It's kind of like volunteering to work at a Zoo, then breaking down hysterically because there are too many people around you pointing at animals.
wow, completely missing the point yet again. Yes you're right about the definition of a Beta, and I applaud anyone who has tortured themselves to keep putting themselves through this bs. I know it's a beta and that there are bugs and problems to find and solve, my point was I was highlighting the terrible gameplay mechanics, that go far beyond any minor bugs that need to be identified and ironed out. Is it really that hard to see where I'm coming from?
and by staying alive, I meant it will be because the absolute bottom end of the market with zero standards will be the ones playing this which there is an abundance of. But WHY settle for mediocrity? WHY settle for the lowest end of the market when you have a game with SO MUCH potential to rival even paid-for games like BF3 and MW3.. why sell your product short with all this potential?
Iceyburnz wrote:Vicx V wrote:I was SO excited about this for months...[stuff] So from me, goodbye and good riddance. So instead of offering concise and construct ways to make the game better. You chose to offer non-sensical comparatives and throw your dummy out of the pram. There's no need to be concise, I've made it clear it's the overall gameplay and shooting mechanics, the bulk of the game that needs addressing. And according to these other posts, others have already pointed out specifics but have been ignored.
Alright I've made my point, I'm simply just repeating myself now. As long as CCP acknowledge these points this thread will have served it's purpose. Good luck.
|
crazy space
ZionTCD Legacy Rising
879
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 15:10:00 -
[37] - Quote
Go play the massively still popular warhawk, then play the dust beta again.
Also how is the forge gun, pistol, rifle, sniper , and grenade launchers anything like each other? |
Templar Two
Villore Sec Ops Gallente Federation
459
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 15:10:00 -
[38] - Quote
Dust 514 has been in developement for more then 3 years. Expecting more solidity is really that foolish?! |
Vicx V
Circle of Huskarl Minmatar Republic
26
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 15:10:00 -
[39] - Quote
Chihiro Itto wrote:People who say they dislike a game then spend their time on that game's forums instead of doing something else with their lives make me larf.
Read my 2nd post in this thread, it's called caring about a game enough to come back and provide constructive criticism, something you've obviously never heard of or even considered. |
Rasatsu
Much Crying Old Experts
437
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 15:13:00 -
[40] - Quote
The OP seems to have intimate knowledge on the subject of interspecies ball licking, I wonder how? |
|
ReGnUm DEl
Doomheim
622
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 15:14:00 -
[41] - Quote
crazy space wrote:Go play the massively still popular warhawk, then play the dust beta again.
Also how is the forge gun, pistol, rifle, sniper , and grenade launchers anything like each other?
Go play any AAA shooter and then come back to DUST |
Rasatsu
Much Crying Old Experts
437
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 15:16:00 -
[42] - Quote
ReGnUm DEl wrote:crazy space wrote:Go play the massively still popular warhawk, then play the dust beta again.
Also how is the forge gun, pistol, rifle, sniper , and grenade launchers anything like each other? Go play any AAA shooter and then come back to DUST Naah, just go play any AAA shooter and don't come back at all.
Also can I have your stuff? |
Templar Two
Villore Sec Ops Gallente Federation
459
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 15:16:00 -
[43] - Quote
I have been saying that Dust 514 needs to match the standard of other FPS and I was insulted as if being as good as the best FPS on the market is something to despise. |
ReGnUm DEl
Doomheim
622
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 15:17:00 -
[44] - Quote
Rasatsu wrote:ReGnUm DEl wrote:crazy space wrote:Go play the massively still popular warhawk, then play the dust beta again.
Also how is the forge gun, pistol, rifle, sniper , and grenade launchers anything like each other? Go play any AAA shooter and then come back to DUST Naah, just go play any AAA shooter and don't come back at all. Also can I have your stuff?
stroke me hard baby |
Rasatsu
Much Crying Old Experts
437
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 15:20:00 -
[45] - Quote
ReGnUm DEl wrote:Rasatsu wrote:ReGnUm DEl wrote:crazy space wrote:Go play the massively still popular warhawk, then play the dust beta again.
Also how is the forge gun, pistol, rifle, sniper , and grenade launchers anything like each other? Go play any AAA shooter and then come back to DUST Naah, just go play any AAA shooter and don't come back at all. Also can I have your stuff? stroke me hard baby As long as you understand who's alpha and who's beta in this relationship. |
Garrett Blacknova
Codex Troopers
1849
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 15:21:00 -
[46] - Quote
Templar Two wrote:I have been saying that Dust 514 needs to match the standard of other FPS and I was insulted as if being as good as the best FPS on the market is something to despise. People aren't saying that DUST shouldn't match the quality of other games.
We're saying it shouldn't try to BE the other games, and we're saying that it's stupid to expect something that's still blatantly a work in progress to be at that level already when it's still in closed beta. |
EnglishSnake
Zumari Force Projection Caldari State
1012
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 15:23:00 -
[47] - Quote
This thread is just 1 clusterfuck with no constructive anything in it
Should let it die tbh |
Bresker Veyne
Algintal Core Gallente Federation
152
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 15:24:00 -
[48] - Quote
The majority of the people in beta don't go to these forums (thank god for that). They wanna play the game, see what it's all about and maybe have a little fun.
So, what do you experience when you first enter the game: instant death by all those with better gear and unclear tutorials about how the fitting and market system works. As a new player you are forced to run behind your team mates like a little lapdog or pray for a tank or decent fitted dropship to come by so you can become a gunner.
Basically, new players aren't allowed to have fun in this build. So ofcourse a lot of players decided to drop the game! The vast majority of the people who use this forum already have the sp to be able to kill people, and there are a lot of people who are too stupid to realise how frustrating it is for a newer player to get to this point!
Not only the big skill point gap, but the clunky gameplay and hit detection failing is a big turn off. I realise that this is a beta, but the game seriously needs to be a lot smoother when it comes out. I'm amazed that this game already has fanboys, but they're useless when it comes to giving feedback for the game.
So I hope CCP will keep this game in beta as long as possible untill the gameplay feels smooth and responsive. Releasing it in it's current state would be a death sentence. |
Iceyburnz
316
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 15:25:00 -
[49] - Quote
Vicx V wrote: There's no need to be concise, I've made it clear it's the overall gameplay and shooting mechanics, the bulk of the game that needs addressing. And according to these other posts, others have already pointed out specifics but have been ignored.
Because CCP devs don't answer every single post does not mean they have been ignored. Testing the game and providing constructive feed back is an obligation we have as players while participating in the BETA.
You did not provide constructive feedback, instead you adopted the "angry consumer" persona. In your post you even identify how your where "mis-sold" the product stating that the product itself is merely a knock off of other similar products. It seems to me you undertook play testing in the completely wrong mind set. Let me clarify; are not a consumer where Dust 514 is concerned. You are a "participant", bound by a civil agreement you chose to accept.
You only have yourself to blame for your disappointment.
|
Rorek IronBlood
ZionTCD Legacy Rising
746
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 15:25:00 -
[50] - Quote
EnglishSnake wrote:This thread is just 1 clusterfuck with no constructive anything in it
Should let it die tbh
That sums up what the forums have been like all morning. Nothing, but trolls, circle jerking, and other ignorant fools ranting, raging, and clogging up the forums.
Stupidity this morning is rampant. |
|
ReGnUm DEl
Doomheim
622
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 15:28:00 -
[51] - Quote
Rasatsu wrote:ReGnUm DEl wrote:Rasatsu wrote:ReGnUm DEl wrote:crazy space wrote:Go play the massively still popular warhawk, then play the dust beta again.
Also how is the forge gun, pistol, rifle, sniper , and grenade launchers anything like each other? Go play any AAA shooter and then come back to DUST Naah, just go play any AAA shooter and don't come back at all. Also can I have your stuff? stroke me hard baby As long as you understand who's alpha and who's beta in this relationship.
all be Beta but we have to let Delta in as well... pretty please |
ReGnUm DEl
Doomheim
622
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 15:30:00 -
[52] - Quote
Rorek IronBlood wrote:EnglishSnake wrote:This thread is just 1 clusterfuck with no constructive anything in it
Should let it die tbh That sums up what the forums have been like all morning. Nothing, but trolls, circle jerking, and other ignorant fools ranting, raging, and clogging up the forums. Stupidity this morning is rampant.
HeZ HAz no gun game so all he do is type on ForumZ |
Benjamin Hellios
Villore Sec Ops Gallente Federation
259
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 15:31:00 -
[53] - Quote
It is strange how people get chastised on these forums for pointing out flaws or dislikings with the game, regardless of being in beta or not. It's safe to assume we all want this game to succeed. Some are just less convinced that the game will actually be good unless some drastic changes are made, which is a perfectly valid opinion considering a 2012 release was stated, as far as i know the game has been in development since 2009, if this is the result of 4 years of development, that's more than a little concerning. |
Rorek IronBlood
ZionTCD Legacy Rising
746
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 15:33:00 -
[54] - Quote
ReGnUm DEl wrote:Rorek IronBlood wrote:EnglishSnake wrote:This thread is just 1 clusterfuck with no constructive anything in it
Should let it die tbh That sums up what the forums have been like all morning. Nothing, but trolls, circle jerking, and other ignorant fools ranting, raging, and clogging up the forums. Stupidity this morning is rampant. HeZ HAz no gun game so all he do is type on ForumZ
Uh-huh. Okay troll. Say what you want. All I see is some pathetic tween with no life outside of what self gratification and validation he can get from flaunting, and stroking e-peen.
Your move, ma'am. |
JaZZa01
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
81
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 15:36:00 -
[55] - Quote
Sojuro Ryo wrote:JaZZa01 wrote:Lmao, look at all these fanboys. When somebody says something bad, it's like a child responding with their hands over their ears, "NO NO, BETA, LA LA LA, DUST IS PERFECT."
+1 to OP. Game won't change. Release will just have more skills and items. Gameplay overhaul as Templar stated, is impossible. Partly because CCP don't know what they're doing, but mostly the moronic fanbase that enjoys half-assed mechanics already has a foothold. No one is saying it's perfect. We're just saying don't complain about it as if it were released. If you truly thin the way you do then why are you here wasting our space? Just leave and be done with it. Constructive criticism is good but whining is childish. CCP didn't put up a sub-forum called Feedback/Requests for nothing. And therein lies the problem. People can be constructive all they want, but the vocal players that already have an appreciation for inferiority will always reject criticism as invalid. |
Tony Calif
Seraphim Initiative. CRONOS.
2002
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 15:38:00 -
[56] - Quote
JaZZa01 wrote:Lmao, look at all these fanboys. When somebody says something bad, it's like a child responding with their hands over their ears, "NO NO, BETA, LA LA LA, DUST IS PERFECT."
+1 to OP. Game won't change. Release will just have more skills and items. Gameplay overhaul as Templar stated, is impossible. Partly because CCP don't know what they're doing, but mostly the moronic fanbase that enjoys half-assed mechanics already has a foothold.
This |
Grizl Takus
13
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 15:40:00 -
[57] - Quote
JaZZa01 wrote:Sojuro Ryo wrote:JaZZa01 wrote:Lmao, look at all these fanboys. When somebody says something bad, it's like a child responding with their hands over their ears, "NO NO, BETA, LA LA LA, DUST IS PERFECT."
+1 to OP. Game won't change. Release will just have more skills and items. Gameplay overhaul as Templar stated, is impossible. Partly because CCP don't know what they're doing, but mostly the moronic fanbase that enjoys half-assed mechanics already has a foothold. No one is saying it's perfect. We're just saying don't complain about it as if it were released. If you truly thin the way you do then why are you here wasting our space? Just leave and be done with it. Constructive criticism is good but whining is childish. CCP didn't put up a sub-forum called Feedback/Requests for nothing. And therein lies the problem. People can be constructive all they want, but the vocal players that already have an appreciation for inferiority will always reject criticism as invalid.
No It's rejected when all it is in name calling and premonitions of fail which is all the OP's post is. |
Darky SI
232
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 15:42:00 -
[58] - Quote
Bresker Veyne wrote:The majority of the people in beta don't go to these forums (thank god for that). They wanna play the game, see what it's all about and maybe have a little fun.
So, what do you experience when you first enter the game: instant death by all those with better gear and unclear tutorials about how the fitting and market system works. As a new player you are forced to run behind your team mates like a little lapdog or pray for a tank or decent fitted dropship to come by so you can become a gunner.
Basically, new players aren't allowed to have fun in this build. So ofcourse a lot of players decided to drop the game! The vast majority of the people who use this forum already have the sp to be able to kill people, and there are a lot of people who are too stupid to realise how frustrating it is for a newer player to get to this point!
Not only the big skill point gap, but the clunky gameplay and hit detection failing is a big turn off. I realise that this is a beta, but the game seriously needs to be a lot smoother when it comes out. I'm amazed that this game already has fanboys, but they're useless when it comes to giving feedback for the game.
So I hope CCP will keep this game in beta as long as possible untill the gameplay feels smooth and responsive. Releasing it in it's current state would be a death sentence. You want constructive criticism CCP, This^^ |
Rorek IronBIood
11
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 15:45:00 -
[59] - Quote
Rorek IronBlood wrote:ReGnUm DEl wrote:Rorek IronBlood wrote:EnglishSnake wrote:This thread is just 1 clusterfuck with no constructive anything in it
Should let it die tbh That sums up what the forums have been like all morning. Nothing, but trolls, circle jerking, and other ignorant fools ranting, raging, and clogging up the forums. Stupidity this morning is rampant. HeZ HAz no gun game so all he do is type on ForumZ Uh-huh. Okay troll. Say what you want. All I see is some pathetic tween with no life outside of what self gratification and validation he can get from flaunting, and stroking e-peen. Your move, ma'am.
your very ignorant |
Templar Two
Villore Sec Ops Gallente Federation
459
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 15:46:00 -
[60] - Quote
Benjamin Hellios wrote:It is strange how people get chastised on these forums for pointing out flaws or dislikings with the game, regardless of being in beta or not. It's safe to assume we all want this game to succeed. Some are just less convinced that the game will actually be good unless some drastic changes are made, which is a perfectly valid opinion considering a 2012 release was stated, as far as i know the game has been in development since 2009, if this is the result of 4 years of development, that's more than a little concerning.
That's me. Still when I say it I am regarded as a fool.
|
|
JaZZa01
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
81
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 15:52:00 -
[61] - Quote
Grizl Takus wrote:JaZZa01 wrote:Sojuro Ryo wrote:JaZZa01 wrote:Lmao, look at all these fanboys. When somebody says something bad, it's like a child responding with their hands over their ears, "NO NO, BETA, LA LA LA, DUST IS PERFECT."
+1 to OP. Game won't change. Release will just have more skills and items. Gameplay overhaul as Templar stated, is impossible. Partly because CCP don't know what they're doing, but mostly the moronic fanbase that enjoys half-assed mechanics already has a foothold. No one is saying it's perfect. We're just saying don't complain about it as if it were released. If you truly thin the way you do then why are you here wasting our space? Just leave and be done with it. Constructive criticism is good but whining is childish. CCP didn't put up a sub-forum called Feedback/Requests for nothing. And therein lies the problem. People can be constructive all they want, but the vocal players that already have an appreciation for inferiority will always reject criticism as invalid. No It's rejected when all it is in name calling and premonitions of fail which is all the OP's post is. I promise you there are hundreds of threads with legitimate criticism and ideas to fix the game, that are buried 50 pages back. All the developers will read is the first few pages, full of "DUST APPRECIATION", "GREAT JOB CCP, LOOKIN FORWARD TO IT" threads, which the silly players continue to reinforce, overlooking the big problems. |
Iron Wolf Saber
BetaMax.
2867
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 15:52:00 -
[62] - Quote
Look at all these spoiled brats that think that beta=early demo/balance stage.
First off this is CCP, its not a real beta, its an alpha. Beta starts on launch day (no seriously it does with the way ccp does things)
Secondly Dust 514 will never stop improving even after launch so even if its not perfect gun play you can still expect improvments.
Bottom line we're only about 5% of possible launch features online, August release is probably going to turn alot of things on that just bug the hell out of the game. Right now it seems they're focusin on foundationing making sure things work and turning more stuff on and getting background server magic to work as well. |
Chihiro Itto
66
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 15:53:00 -
[63] - Quote
Vicx V wrote:Read my 2nd post in this thread, it's called caring about a game enough to come back and provide constructive criticism, something you've obviously never heard of or even considered. That might be a fair point, but I'd hardly call this:
Quote:This is the worst online FPS ever, seriously. this:
Quote:the gameplay that completely and utterly ******* SUCKS! or this:
Quote: the game itself just simply licks the sweat off a dead donkey's dry salty ballsack. ...constructive. A less emotional rant might have headed in that direction, no? You did close more reasonably:
Quote:I sincerely wanted this game to conquer and succeed, but the fact is the gameplay just ain't fun.. although it has the scope and potential to be, it SO does! that's why I'm so genuinely disappointed.
...but after the previous rant it's a less than convincing statement. I actually believe that part, and my initial statement was only partially aimed at this thread, but if you want people to reply to your views - positive or negative - maybe you should temper your outbursts with a little objectivity huh?
For example, any game running on console that desires to pack in infantry and vehicle combat with high player numbers in very large environments is unlikely to be pushing the graphical envelope in any way. I'm disappointed in the graphics myself, at present at least, but having played the game I can live with it. If you can't, fair enough, but at least realise some of the constraints behind the elements you object to. |
EnglishSnake
Zumari Force Projection Caldari State
1012
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 15:56:00 -
[64] - Quote
Yes because crying like a ***** will make the developers take notice in general discussion of all places where most of the threads are generally shite tbh and its just for trolling
|
Aeon Amadi
Maverick Conflict Solutions
1003
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 16:17:00 -
[65] - Quote
Vicx V wrote:I was SO excited about this for months, I thought it would combine MAG and Battlefield into one epic game, best of all it would be free so there'd never be a lack of players.. but after a few hours of really trying to like this game, it fails miserably. I LOVE the depth of the dropsuit customization system, the market place and all the other details that allow you to customize your character to your needs, the MMO influence from Eve Online really shows in this regard.. but at the end of the day it's the gameplay that completely and utterly ******* SUCKS! It feels like an extremely budget version of MAG and Section 8 Prejudice combined, except it feels even MORE cheap and budget (in fact I feel like getting back into both of those games right now) The incredibly BLAND graphics, the lag, the multitude of weapons that all end up being small variations of eachother and all look and feel pretty much the same with minor RoF and damage attributes.. I could go on, but my point is, regardless of all the attention to detail in the customization, the game itself just simply licks the sweat off a dead donkey's dry salty ballsack.
It's no wonder they're charging $20 for the Mercenary Pack, because that's the most money they'll be able to extract from people who've yet to play the game. A majority of people will end up disgusted and only a small minority, even smaller than the niche gamers in MAG and S8P will stick with this game simply due to it being a free game and possibly out of pure boredom. Once the final product releases on PSN, people will download, try it out and most will never touch it again. That's the single biggest reason they released the Mercenary pack, to milk all the eager and optimistic and people who like me, think this game has huge potential.
Unless the gameplay is seriously overhalled FROM SCRATCH, this game will fail within months of release. The ONLY thing that'll keep this game alive in the long term is the fact that it's free, which will entice the players with the absolute lowest of standards and that market alone.
I sincerely wanted this game to conquer and succeed, but the fact is the gameplay just ain't fun.. although it has the scope and potential to be, it SO does! that's why I'm so genuinely disappointed.
So from me, goodbye and good riddance.
Bai *****, won't need you on the battlefield to win our wars anyway. Quit crying and man up you superficial ****.
|
Antilles Maximus
ZionTCD Legacy Rising
80
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 16:25:00 -
[66] - Quote
CCP must not work weekends. How long is this ridiculous thread going to go before it's locked? |
Dewie Cheecham
Villore Sec Ops Gallente Federation
677
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 16:27:00 -
[67] - Quote
Vicx V wrote:*** Long Rant ***
Some of what you said are probably valid grievances. Had this been a final release.
I feel I have to say this though: This is... |
Tony Calif
Seraphim Initiative. CRONOS.
2002
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 16:36:00 -
[68] - Quote
So because it's a beta just assume everything will be fine. Because Dust will be the only MMOFPS.... Oh wait.... There's about 5 really good ones comming? Choices choices. Dust is the obvious choice if you play EvE. Which is very few ps3 owners. |
Benjamin Hellios
Villore Sec Ops Gallente Federation
259
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 16:38:00 -
[69] - Quote
Antilles Maximus wrote:CCP must not work weekends. How long is this ridiculous thread going to go before it's locked?
There's a few "I aM tHe BeSt PlAyEr In dUsT EvUhR" threads that didn't get locked so I doubt this one will since it has some valid points in it, somewhere, hidden in the cesspool of retardation and hatred. |
Brandon Madullier2
ZionTCD Legacy Rising
2
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 16:39:00 -
[70] - Quote
let me redirect you to a good post that explains what CCP does https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=28858&find=unread |
|
Dewie Cheecham
Villore Sec Ops Gallente Federation
677
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 16:39:00 -
[71] - Quote
JaZZa01 wrote:I promise you there are hundreds of threads with legitimate criticism and ideas to fix the game, that are buried 50 pages back. All the developers will read is the first few pages, full of "DUST APPRECIATION", "GREAT JOB CCP, LOOKIN FORWARD TO IT" threads, which the silly players continue to reinforce, overlooking the big problems.
There is a difference you are forgetting.
The appreciative comments are the ones applauding progress. And there have been a lot of that. But criticism comes in many forms, and the threads that want DUST to be more like other, old games, are generally not to be taken seriously at all. Not that DUST can't learn from their successes and failures, it should, but the entire foundation of DUST is just too alien for it to be like CoD, BF, Halo or other existing games.
DUST is the first FPS that have made me laugh, smile, frown and rage. Inside a minute.
I was bored with CoD after an hour. An hour of really trying. |
Alkai Chromision
Circle of Huskarl Minmatar Republic
7
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 16:40:00 -
[72] - Quote
Chihiro Itto wrote:[ETC.....] For example, any game running on console that desires to pack in infantry and vehicle combat with high player numbers in very large environments is unlikely to be pushing the graphical envelope in any way. I'm disappointed in the graphics myself, at present at least, but having played the game I can live with it. If you can't, fair enough, but at least realise some of the constraints behind the elements you object to.
Nicely put. Good points and true. Despite that, the OP does have some valid points. Humans are emotional. It happens. Rather than discern the focus of the topic and discuss valid constructivism, the "supporters" only want to post about their blind love for this software, offering nothing to enrich the topic, only immaturity to degrade it. Here i'm contributing nothing as well, but wanted to commend a respectable post. More of which is needed to make some progress, for or against the game. |
Benjamin Hellios
Villore Sec Ops Gallente Federation
259
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 16:42:00 -
[73] - Quote
Brandon Madullier2 wrote:
From that same thread:
Quote:If you want to help out however keep leaving feedback on the things that are broken
Calling everything shite falls in that category somewhat |
Knarf Black
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
397
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 16:44:00 -
[74] - Quote
Lay off your panic buttons, folks. This is still the E3 build we're playing, and it was a radical improvement in both graphics and gameplay over the previous version. If the final version is even half as much of an improvement over this, the game should be plenty competitive with other shooters. (Not that I'm expecting it to be the best looking or smoothest controlling shooter on the market.)
I don't understand these threads at all. Nobody is putting a gun to your head and forcing you to play this beta. Go play something else if you hate it so much. |
Dewie Cheecham
Villore Sec Ops Gallente Federation
677
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 16:48:00 -
[75] - Quote
Tony Calif wrote:So because it's a beta just assume everything will be fine. Because Dust will be the only MMOFPS.... Oh wait.... There's about 5 really good ones comming? Choices choices. Dust is the obvious choice if you play EvE. Which is very few ps3 owners.
Who said that?
I know, no one did.
DUST is in BETA, and CCP relies on people playing it, testing it, doing great things, and outright stupid things in it. And the rely on the testers to report the good, and the bad. DUST will be fine, only if testers do their JOB. Yes, I said JOB. You are allowed in to an early beta test, a beta that as far as I know are unlike anything previously seen on a console, namely something that is a lot further away from release than most other console "betas" I've heard of. For that privilege, you are expected to give feedback and criticism, and in return for that, you may influence the final direction of the game.
Knowing CCP, for good and bad alike, I currently give them the benefit of the doubt, believing that DUST will be great. Great for people who are willing to spend more than a few minutes setting up their gear and can live with never knowing or being able to do everything in the game. I also think there are more players like that than most think there are. |
Alkai Chromision
Circle of Huskarl Minmatar Republic
7
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 16:50:00 -
[76] - Quote
Dewie Cheecham wrote:JaZZa01 wrote:I promise you there are hundreds of threads with legitimate criticism and ideas to fix the game, that are buried 50 pages back. All the developers will read is the first few pages, full of "DUST APPRECIATION", "GREAT JOB CCP, LOOKIN FORWARD TO IT" threads, which the silly players continue to reinforce, overlooking the big problems. There is a difference you are forgetting. The appreciative comments are the ones applauding progress. And there have been a lot of that. But criticism comes in many forms, and the threads that want DUST to be more like other, old games, are generally not to be taken seriously at all. Not that DUST can't learn from their successes and failures, it should, but the entire foundation of DUST is just too alien for it to be like CoD, BF, Halo or other existing games. DUST is the first FPS that have made me laugh, smile, frown and rage. Inside a minute. I was bored with CoD after an hour. An hour of really trying.
Not all criticisms want a game to be like CoD or BF, or MoH, or any others. I wanted to like this game because it was different. I'm great at CoD, good at BF3, was great a Homefront..... I wanted this game because it was different and I wanted it to be. We don't need more of the same. There will be more CoD and more BF no question. My qualms with the game are all gameplay related. Not graphics, not because there's no throwing knives or killstreaks, or anything else. There are valid points for and against the game, for me the pros don't outweigh the cons. And these forums are for those who have tested this product to voice their opinions. Not to voice there opinions on a finished product but to voice their opinions on a beta. So then why are people upset because other people have an opinion on a beta? |
Chihiro Itto
66
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 16:51:00 -
[77] - Quote
Alkai Chromision wrote:Nicely put. Good points and true. Despite that, the OP does have some valid points. Humans are emotional. It happens. Rather than discern the focus of the topic and discuss valid constructivism, the "supporters" only want to post about their blind love for this software, offering nothing to enrich the topic, only immaturity to degrade it. Here i'm contributing nothing as well, but wanted to commend a respectable post. More of which is needed to make some progress, for or against the game.
Thank you. I did agree with at least one of the OP's points, but also pointed out why it might not be one that much could be done about in reality. I have plenty of criticisms myself, but probably most or all have been already been brought up by others. At this point I'm just waiting for the next build.
CCP do need to be more communicative with the community on what issues/suggestions they do and don't intend to work on, and they have said as much, although we also need to realise that this can't be an entirely transparent process.
|
Kazeno Rannaa
Seraphim Initiative. CRONOS.
145
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 16:52:00 -
[78] - Quote
If I didn't know better, I'd almost suspect we're not playing the final release version of the game... OH WAIT.[/quote]Obama DAT wrote:WORK IN PROGRESS CLAP ClAP CLAP YES! 'clap clap clap' yourselves for reacting emotionally like butthurt fanboys and ignoring my point, instead jumping straight to the "but it's still in testing derp!" response.
Even BEFORE you get to the beta testing stage, the seriously terrible gameplay would've been ringing alarm bells in ANYONE who had any decent experience with FPSs in the alpha stage. I know what beta is, and by the beta stage they know exactly what they're doing, so to see such terrible gameplay mechanics at this stage of development either means they either have no faith in their product or they'll just slaving away to break into the FPS market to supplement their EVE universe. It honestly makes no sense how it can be this bad at this later stage of development.
EnglishSnake wrote:Graphics make a game good? lolno look at BF3 and that pile of shite which is constantly getting patched and made worse where its a twitch shooter to the max and everything else is made of paper Yes BF3 does have a shitload of problems, but despite that at least the gameplay overall is SOLID and performs well, both on an infantry and vehicle aspect.
Sha Kharn Clone wrote:Its the only FPS I gotz so I have nothing to compare it too but I'm loving it and cant wait till we have those long running skirmish maps that roll on from one objective to the next. THIS is a perfect example of how I said in my first post that only the players with the absolute lowest of standards will be the ones still playing this in the long term, because they simply wouldn't know any better or just don't have any standards.
Seriously, stop taking this offensively, listen objectively, I'm trying to make a valid point that if taken seriously might improve the game. I'm not here to hurl random insults and mindless abuse, I do not troll.[/quote]
@ Vikx : Your last sentence seems contradictory to the actual message that is being hurled by you. Funny. Do you ever listen to yourself with out having a bunch of "yes-men" around you stroking your pecker?
If you don't like what is being presented, then why do you persist in 1) playing the beta if it is SO BAD, 2) even continue to post on the forums, 3) continue to annoy those of us that actually enjoy the game, its complexity, and the available life span that it is so clearly displaying to us. Freedom of choice ids an amazing thing. You can CHOOSE to be apart of it, or you can CHOOSE NOT TO. So make a choice.
Personally, I have my issues with the game play, and I am no rooky to FPS's. I have been playing them probably before you were even born, beginning with the original Doom and Wolfenstein (circa 1986-1988). I have more hours logged into FPS's than I did in the military (5 years in the Army). I will not disagree with the fact that the game is not perfect, YET. Then again , from my conversations with EVE players, neither was EVE in it's infancy. Yet, unlike BF3, BFBC2, COD, or any of those other money pits, this will have a life span of several years, if not decades, due to CCP's drive to continuously evolve, grow, and improve their products along with the experience that is being provided to their communities. This is very different than the mentality behind Activision, Electronic Arts, and every other developer out there that is just trying to sell a single run game, minimize support, and maximize profits (i.e., they don't give a sh*t about their communities except for pillaging them).
AGAIN, if you don't like it, get off our NUTS. IF you want to be a constructive member of this community, be exactly that, constructive.
Expectations are very much like assumptions: they are those actions that become the birthing place of all f*ckups and issues. Or as my grand mother and father would say, they are like opinions; they are like as*holes, everyone has one and they ALL STINK> Every time you have an expectation or you assume anything, you are bound to be disappointed. So try hard not to do either. It would be better for the heart.
I should know because even I continue to have my hopes about this game and it's mechanics (expectations and assumptions) and I have moments that I am very disappointed (MY OWN FAULT, not just the sole fault of CCP). This is their first FPS, and I have to say they are doing a great job considering this fact and the idea that they want to produce a lasting experience that is part of an even larger universe.
That is sure as sh*t a hell of a lot more than the previously mentioned developers have ever tried to do, let alone accomplish.
|
Entruv
Tronhadar Free Guard Minmatar Republic
32
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 16:56:00 -
[79] - Quote
I did not read all the comments but it's a ******* beta bro chill out. Those are the last things to be implemented.
Oh ya thanks for leaving. |
Ire's thug
GunFall Mobilization Covert Intervention
272
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 17:03:00 -
[80] - Quote
/lock Troll filled Troll thread?
Edit: A Very articulate troll thread... but Stiiiilll a troll thread. |
|
Iron Wolf Saber
BetaMax.
2867
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 17:12:00 -
[81] - Quote
They need to make a new term for fake betas. Delta Builds! Where its more of a demo than a beta. |
UnclS2
Deadly Blue Dots RISE of LEGION
6
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 17:16:00 -
[82] - Quote
Just on a side note, did anyone play the BF3 open beta???
What a bloody mess that was, no comms, horrable lag and players constantly falling through the map or glitching under it.
At launch..........comms so bad they were useless
The improvments made in DUST from the last build to this one are encouraging. After all we have solid ground to walk on and working chat I agree that work still needs to be done but at the same time it's a work in progress so there you have it.
Looking forward to the next build |
Josh Bennett
Crux Special Tasks Group Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 17:26:00 -
[83] - Quote
I don't think even this Beta stage is the worst FPS ever. A bit generic maybe, but there is still a lot of fun to be had. The fact that it is still a Beta means there is work yet to be done. I love Battlefield 3 right now, but the Beta version of that game I played was terrible! The final product was worlds better than the Beta, and even convinced friends of mine that wrote off the game because the Beta was bad. Since the game is going to be free, I would suggest holding off judgement until you can at least try the finished game, for free. |
Templar Two
Villore Sec Ops Gallente Federation
459
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 17:37:00 -
[84] - Quote
I have a question for you guys: what makes you think that Dust will become a completely different game without any of the issues we have now? What is that you see that we "Dust 514 perplexed" don't? |
des polo
Villore Sec Ops Gallente Federation
22
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 17:41:00 -
[85] - Quote
Templar Two wrote:I have a question: what makes you think guys that Dust 54 2ill become a completely different game without any of the issues we have now? Dude look at eve the Very first build looks nothing like its current one, so chances are Dust will be the same. |
Iron Wolf Saber
BetaMax.
2867
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 17:42:00 -
[86] - Quote
Case in point http://cdn1.eveonline.com/EVEHistory/2000.06_Orion.jpg eve's first build.
Eve's current build http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kED11aGobUk |
StormForce64
11
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 17:46:00 -
[87] - Quote
You all have too much time on you hands and are repeating yourselves and others. The game has flaws and highlights. We all know this. It makes no sense predicting its failure or success. Just write about what you think is a plus or minus and leave it to the developers to fix. It is their game, their vision. It is nether good nor bad. No need to rage or defend. I've written about flaws and I still play. Not because I think it's the best or going to be the best, but it's fun to help something improve. I beta tested BF3 and that had serious flaws (falling "through" the map was particularly annoying). I and others commented. The game came out and still had issues. So, I didn't play it. I moved on to another game. Dust beta is better than the BF3 beta, to me; but still have problems including it is unmatched, unballanced, unfair to newer players, too many weapon variations , etc.; but it will be free with a background history, details and customization, and interact with the Eve Universe, which is unprecedented. So let us get off our high horses and either get back into the game or move on. Either way, I will Play! |
Thick McRun Fast
Crux Special Tasks Group Gallente Federation
177
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 17:49:00 -
[88] - Quote
Templar Two wrote:I have a question: what makes you think Dust 54 2ill become a completely different game without any of the issues we have now? We will have issues. Its pretty ignorant to think it wont. BUT. Unlike other main stream shooters that may get a few purchasable download contents and a few bug fixes. Dust will receive full content patches roughly twice a year of its existence not including tweaks and bug patches being available as often as necessary. It may not be a completely different game at release, but every year we can expect big changes to evolve it. Specially as it starts to interact with EvE more. |
Benjamin Hellios
Villore Sec Ops Gallente Federation
259
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 17:51:00 -
[89] - Quote
des polo wrote:Templar Two wrote:I have a question: what makes you think guys that Dust 54 2ill become a completely different game without any of the issues we have now? Dude look at eve the Very first build looks nothing like its current one, so chances are Dust will be the same.
That's true, this game is gonna be HUGE...10 years from now. |
Lurchasaurus
SVER True Blood Unclaimed.
808
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 17:53:00 -
[90] - Quote
Thick McRun Fast wrote:Templar Two wrote:I have a question: what makes you think Dust 54 2ill become a completely different game without any of the issues we have now? We will have issues. Its pretty ignorant to think it wont. BUT. Unlike other main stream shooters that may get a few purchasable download contents and a few bug fixes. Dust will receive full content patches roughly twice a year of its existence not including tweaks and bug patches being available as often as necessary. It may not be a completely different game at release, but every year we can expect big changes to evolve it. Specially as it starts to interact with EvE more.
exactly, but you can only keep telling these people that cause they come from a COD or BF background where they havent experienced the awesomeness of regular updates instead of a **** company trying to squeeze every last penny out of your pocket
You guys dont know it yet, but your blessed that CCP is the dev team behind this game... |
|
Lurchasaurus
SVER True Blood Unclaimed.
808
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 17:54:00 -
[91] - Quote
Benjamin Hellios wrote:des polo wrote:Templar Two wrote:I have a question: what makes you think guys that Dust 54 2ill become a completely different game without any of the issues we have now? Dude look at eve the Very first build looks nothing like its current one, so chances are Dust will be the same. That's true, this game is gonna be HUGE...10 years from now.
you joke, but yeah it will still be around by then probs, unlike your fav BF or COD which cant last more than a few months
edit: and i should watch my tone, i have nothing against those games, i love em and play em too |
Benjamin Hellios
Villore Sec Ops Gallente Federation
259
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 17:59:00 -
[92] - Quote
Lurchasaurus wrote:Benjamin Hellios wrote:des polo wrote:Templar Two wrote:I have a question: what makes you think guys that Dust 54 2ill become a completely different game without any of the issues we have now? Dude look at eve the Very first build looks nothing like its current one, so chances are Dust will be the same. That's true, this game is gonna be HUGE...10 years from now. you joke, but yeah it will still be around by then probs, unlike your fav BF or COD which cant last more than a few months edit: and i should watch my tone, i have nothing against those games, i love em and play em too
I do the last ones I enjoyed were the first MW and BC2, after that it all started blending together somehow. But it's true, I joke, I'm actually looking forward to this game but like others I have an ungrounded worry that's it's not gonna get better, I don't know where that comes from. |
Iron Wolf Saber
BetaMax.
2867
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 18:01:00 -
[93] - Quote
There shouldnt be so much worry unless sony decides they pull the plug, then again I think its sony's fault for not showcasing dust 514 at the e3 last year.
CCP is probably going to stubbornly keep this game alive. |
Templar Two
Villore Sec Ops Gallente Federation
459
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 18:07:00 -
[94] - Quote
Dust 514 is not Sony, it's a PS3 exclusive like Final Fantasy XIV but it's not a Sony developed game like Uncharted or God of War. CCP is both the developer and the publisher. Sony has no control whatsoever on Dust 514 beside patches and PSN integration. |
EnglishSnake
Zumari Force Projection Caldari State
1012
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 18:07:00 -
[95] - Quote
Sony doesnt have control over patches
They dont have to go through Q&A
Its all CCP control |
Mavado V Noriega
SyNergy Gaming
2283
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 18:12:00 -
[96] - Quote
EnglishSnake wrote:'Yes BF3 does have a shitload of problems, but despite that at least the gameplay overall is SOLID and performs well, both on an infantry and vehicle aspect.'
How is BF3 solid gameplay its a twitch shooter with every gun having a stupid amount of recoil and patches which add recoil when you add a foregrip
Also vehicles suck since they are made out of paper and are useless after 1 hit by an RPG
dont forget u can destroy a tank faster with a repair tool than 2 ppl reppin it can fix it LOL |
Hehaw Jimbo
Bragian Order Amarr Empire
46
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 18:16:00 -
[97] - Quote
Honestly, this game has a lot of problems (potential too, but I'm getting less and less optimistic that it will come close to being realized), and the "ITS BETA!" excuse really can't be held onto. The game was already supposed to be out (was announced for spring/summer 2012) , and it plays like an alpha build.
The gunplay is sloppy, newbs/people that don't have time to farm a lot get hardcore stomped due to how much better higher level gear/skills are, vehicle spam is extremely dull. On top of that, most of the promised features (like, any link with EVE whatsoever) is totally non-existent at this point in time, and we STILL don't even have concrete details on how the link is going to work/what it is going to affect. All we have are still vague promises, almost like they don't know how they're going to handle it still.
For a game that should have been out already, this game needs WAY too much work, and with the tame changes between builds so far, I really don't think it is going to happen. I hope they surprise me, but the people still hiding behind "ITS A BETA" are likely going to be in for some serious disappointment at launch. CCP already takes forever to fix the most basic of things in their other game (EVE), with iterations on broken mechanics often taking YEARS to be semi-fixed, and a lot of times they're just bandaids. I'm sorry, but expecting them to pull a complete 180 on this game that's already been in development for years and should be out soon doesn't seem very realistic.
They aren't really comparable, though. EVE has had effectively no competition for what it does (space-based sandbox MMO), is on the PC, and has been funded by a monthly subscription. I have played EVE since the beginning and still do, but I honestly believe if they had any real competition for the first few years, the game never would have survived CCP's long long iteration procress and horrible bugs (google eve boot.ini issue for some lawls).
Dust, on the other hand, is on a single console only (arguably the least popular one), has a crazy amount of competition (esp an unnamed upcoming true MMOFPS sequel...), and its only funding is banking on the game being good enough for people to keep it alive through microtransactions. After the EVE Incarna fiasco that caused tons of layoffs and put World of Darkness on the back burner, I don't think CCP can afford to have the game flop and still keep it alive for years before it gets good, because they have tons of competition that EVE did not. |
Ad ski
IMPSwarm Negative-Feedback
209
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 18:17:00 -
[98] - Quote
I actually like this game lol. |
Lurchasaurus
SVER True Blood Unclaimed.
808
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 18:18:00 -
[99] - Quote
yeah dude, CCP makes so much money from EVE they dont need to worry about the success of Dust....which will be successful.
One of the biggest complaints from people coming from other shooters is that the game *SHOCKING* isnt like COD or BF, so therefore theres no way it can be successful, therefore it will flop unless they nerf this that and do this....
CCP does things their way and have been successful at it for YEARS. Dust is going to be so tied into EVE that it CANT flop.
Also, about Dust being different....DUH. CCP doesnt do balance, they do perfect imbalace. While skillz in game are nice, money makes the EVE universe go round.
You come at me with your crazy gun game and ill fall on the ground laughing as some corp throws so much money at you you cant wipe your ass. Im talking orital strikes on you by your own employer just cause they think its funny |
Hehaw Jimbo
Bragian Order Amarr Empire
46
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 18:31:00 -
[100] - Quote
Lurchasaurus wrote:y CCP does things their way and have been successful at it for YEARS. Dust is going to be so tied into EVE that it CANT flop.
We don't know that. They've been very careful to not give solid details on the links of DUST and EVE, but they have said in the past that they are designing it so that if one fails, the other will not automatically fail. If this is the case, I have a feeling the "eve-dust link" is going to be more of a gimmick than anything. From what they've said it looks like it will involve Eve's PI (Planetary Interaction) which...wasn't exactly a huge success when it was introduced in EVE. Most people I know completely ignore PI as is because it is a boring clickfest that is of questionable worth unless you do it in null, and have a logistics chain that makes getting the product to market actually worthwhile. |
|
Abron Garr
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
256
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 18:31:00 -
[101] - Quote
During the last build I was really worried about the future of Dust. The shooting mechanics were absolute garbage. If you don't think the current build is a marked improvement over the last, then you're full of sh*t. CCP appears to at least improve gun mechanics with each iteration. I'm pretty sure we're just seeing the bare minimum. The flavor details and fluff we're accustomed to in other shooters isn't present.
Look at the Dust 514 keynote. The AR actually sounds pretty good in that video and the shooting looks a little more crisp than what we're seeing now. There was even friendly fire. I just wish we could see what CCP is currently working on so we could gauge a better feel for how the game is improving.
|
KingBlade82
Crux Special Tasks Group Gallente Federation
56
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 18:34:00 -
[102] - Quote
im so lost whats so bad about gameplay ik everything i thought was wrong they promised to fix in next build i love the game idk why all of u complain about stuff and dont mention what u think is wrong and all this 180 talk confuses me cause the games not even close to bad enough to ever consider that and i own MW3 and BF3 and played plenty more shooters on the ps3 my trophy rank is lvl 20 and most come from shooters so ive had plenty of experience with judging gameplay and such |
Abron Garr
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
256
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 18:40:00 -
[103] - Quote
KingBlade82 wrote:im so lost whats so bad about gameplay ik everything i thought was wrong they promised to fix in next build i love the game idk why all of u complain about stuff and dont mention what u think is wrong and all this 180 talk confuses me cause the games not even close to bad enough to ever consider that and i own MW3 and BF3 and played plenty more shooters on the ps3 my trophy rank is lvl 20 and most come from shooters so ive had plenty of experience with judging gameplay and such
Hit detection still needs work. The game still feels "clunky" and some actions feel sluggish or non-responsive. |
Iron Wolf Saber
BetaMax.
2867
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 18:42:00 -
[104] - Quote
Hehaw Jimbo wrote: They aren't really comparable, though. EVE has had effectively no competition for what it does (space-based sandbox MMO), is on the PC, and has been funded by a monthly subscription. I have played EVE since the beginning and still do, but I honestly believe if they had any real competition for the first few years, the game never would have survived CCP's long long iteration procress and horrible bugs (google eve boot.ini issue for some lawls).
There been few of them all of which have died out since then. Most recent of which was Star Trek Online. Heck even The Old Republic Bolstered Eve's numbers oddly. There was another space based game Jumpgate which its prequel that came out near the same time has on average 25 people playing on its server its sequel however is seemingly a no show so far
Games like vendetta online are almost no shows nobody i talked seems to hear of it. Earth and Beyond another title was made by the ever so missed westwood studios and the plug was uncermoniously pulled when ea bought them out.
I havent heard any news of Black Prophetcy, Infiite space and scores of others competing against eve yet. There is also rumor EA is making thier own Sci Fi mmo to directly compete against eve and offering 'presistent' progression where they take your eve character data and use it turn you into instant veteran. |
Mobius Wyvern
BetaMax.
1216
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 18:43:00 -
[105] - Quote
Vicx V wrote:I was SO excited about this for months, I thought it would combine MAG and Battlefield into one epic game, best of all it would be free so there'd never be a lack of players.. but after a few hours of really trying to like this game, it fails miserably. I LOVE the depth of the dropsuit customization system, the market place and all the other details that allow you to customize your character to your needs, the MMO influence from Eve Online really shows in this regard.. but at the end of the day it's the gameplay that completely and utterly ******* SUCKS! It feels like an extremely budget version of MAG and Section 8 Prejudice combined, except it feels even MORE cheap and budget (in fact I feel like getting back into both of those games right now) The incredibly BLAND graphics, the lag, the multitude of weapons that all end up being small variations of eachother and all look and feel pretty much the same with minor RoF and damage attributes.. I could go on, but my point is, regardless of all the attention to detail in the customization, the game itself just simply licks the sweat off a dead donkey's dry salty ballsack.
It's no wonder they're charging $20 for the Mercenary Pack, because that's the most money they'll be able to extract from people who've yet to play the game. A majority of people will end up disgusted and only a small minority, even smaller than the niche gamers in MAG and S8P will stick with this game simply due to it being a free game and possibly out of pure boredom. Once the final product releases on PSN, people will download, try it out and most will never touch it again. That's the single biggest reason they released the Mercenary pack, to milk all the eager and optimistic and people who like me, think this game has huge potential.
Unless the gameplay is seriously overhalled FROM SCRATCH, this game will fail within months of release. The ONLY thing that'll keep this game alive in the long term is the fact that it's free, which will entice the players with the absolute lowest of standards and that market alone.
I sincerely wanted this game to conquer and succeed, but the fact is the gameplay just ain't fun.. although it has the scope and potential to be, it SO does! that's why I'm so genuinely disappointed.
So from me, goodbye and good riddance. Oh look, another impatient imbecile. |
xprotoman23
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
1452
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 18:44:00 -
[106] - Quote
Vicx V wrote:I was SO excited about this for months, I thought it would combine MAG and Battlefield into one epic game, best of all it would be free so there'd never be a lack of players.. but after a few hours of really trying to like this game, it fails miserably. I LOVE the depth of the dropsuit customization system, the market place and all the other details that allow you to customize your character to your needs, the MMO influence from Eve Online really shows in this regard.. but at the end of the day it's the gameplay that completely and utterly ******* SUCKS! It feels like an extremely budget version of MAG and Section 8 Prejudice combined, except it feels even MORE cheap and budget (in fact I feel like getting back into both of those games right now) The incredibly BLAND graphics, the lag, the multitude of weapons that all end up being small variations of eachother and all look and feel pretty much the same with minor RoF and damage attributes.. I could go on, but my point is, regardless of all the attention to detail in the customization, the game itself just simply licks the sweat off a dead donkey's dry salty ballsack.
It's no wonder they're charging $20 for the Mercenary Pack, because that's the most money they'll be able to extract from people who've yet to play the game. A majority of people will end up disgusted and only a small minority, even smaller than the niche gamers in MAG and S8P will stick with this game simply due to it being a free game and possibly out of pure boredom. Once the final product releases on PSN, people will download, try it out and most will never touch it again. That's the single biggest reason they released the Mercenary pack, to milk all the eager and optimistic and people who like me, think this game has huge potential.
Unless the gameplay is seriously overhalled FROM SCRATCH, this game will fail within months of release. The ONLY thing that'll keep this game alive in the long term is the fact that it's free, which will entice the players with the absolute lowest of standards and that market alone.
I sincerely wanted this game to conquer and succeed, but the fact is the gameplay just ain't fun.. although it has the scope and potential to be, it SO does! that's why I'm so genuinely disappointed.
So from me, goodbye and good riddance.
Thanks for your opinion OP I appreciate it.
lol at the fanboys.
|
Ima Leet
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
321
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 18:45:00 -
[107] - Quote
butthurt much? couldn't kill anyone? your KDR is -4?
this is a beta not the game. this beta does have a long way to go before being a game. so instead of QQ, post more about what you dont like and how you think it should be. the devs do read these forums |
TEBOW BAGGINS
FIREFLY ATLANTIS ENTERPRISES UNLIMITED TACNET
549
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 18:48:00 -
[108] - Quote
EnglishSnake wrote:Graphics make a game good? lolno look at BF3 and that pile of shite which is constantly getting patched and made worse where its a twitch shooter to the max and everything else is made of paper
Also BETA WIP moron
+1 |
Templar Two
Villore Sec Ops Gallente Federation
459
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 18:48:00 -
[109] - Quote
EnglishSnake wrote:Sony doesnt have control over patches
They dont have to go through Q&A
Its all CCP control
Wrong. Sony still have to give CCP certification. Confirmed by Eurogamer.
|
Xocoyol Zaraoul
Zumari Force Projection Caldari State
259
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 18:49:00 -
[110] - Quote
At the end of the day, you can't please everyone, and someone will dislike something.
Not sure why so many people are arguing. A surprising amount of time is spent on these forums from certain people, I'd much rather play something else then post so much on why the color orange is worse then purple. |
|
TEBOW BAGGINS
FIREFLY ATLANTIS ENTERPRISES UNLIMITED TACNET
549
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 18:53:00 -
[111] - Quote
op do you mean to say dud hand grenades the infamous hitbox and no sqaud support yet is not good?
free likes for every....
ah nvm.. |
pjster long
Doomheim
28
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 18:55:00 -
[112] - Quote
Vicx V wrote: YES! 'clap clap clap' yourselves for reacting emotionally like butthurt fanboys and ignoring my point, instead jumping straight to the "but it's still in testing derp!" response.
Even BEFORE you get to the beta testing stage, the seriously terrible gameplay would've been ringing alarm bells in ANYONE who had any decent experience with FPSs in the alpha stage. I know what beta is, and by the beta stage they know exactly what they're doing, so to see such terrible gameplay mechanics at this stage of development either means they either have no faith in their product or they'll just slaving away to break into the FPS market to supplement their EVE universe. It honestly makes no sense how it can be this bad at this later stage of development.
Just an FYI, even after the game is released, they will always update it with new builds and patches from now to eternity. Just like eve online, except the biggest difference is not only is it not subscription based IT IS FREE TO PLAY!!!! I understand that you are here to help make this a better game but you can try pitching some ideas or something to help. |
EnglishSnake
Zumari Force Projection Caldari State
1012
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 18:55:00 -
[113] - Quote
Templar Two wrote:EnglishSnake wrote:Sony doesnt have control over patches
They dont have to go through Q&A
Its all CCP control Wrong. Sony still have to give CCP certification. Confirmed by Eurogamer.
Ye id rarther take the word of ccp rarther than a mag tbh |
KingBlade82
Crux Special Tasks Group Gallente Federation
56
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 19:26:00 -
[114] - Quote
Abron Garr wrote:KingBlade82 wrote:im so lost whats so bad about gameplay ik everything i thought was wrong they promised to fix in next build i love the game idk why all of u complain about stuff and dont mention what u think is wrong and all this 180 talk confuses me cause the games not even close to bad enough to ever consider that and i own MW3 and BF3 and played plenty more shooters on the ps3 my trophy rank is lvl 20 and most come from shooters so ive had plenty of experience with judging gameplay and such Hit detection still needs work. The game still feels "clunky" and some actions feel sluggish or non-responsive.
can u explain deeper more specific examples
ik a few examples of things i dont like r the knives feel awful but im used to either them moving slow but one hit killing or fast so u can spam them but i really dont want a one hit kill knife unless its a melee weapon that specifically is used to destroy people like a giant hammer or sword or axe etc.
and crouching seems slow and un-crouching
|
TEBOW BAGGINS
FIREFLY ATLANTIS ENTERPRISES UNLIMITED TACNET
549
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 19:29:00 -
[115] - Quote
Vicx V wrote:
But WHY settle for mediocrity? WHY settle for the lowest end of the market when you have a game with SO MUCH potential to rival even paid-for games like BF3 and MW3.. why sell your product short with all this potential?
Because it's not worth getting worked up over.. they're gonna make a game and we're either gonna play it or not. it wont be perfect. most likely like all games it will fall short of it's hype.
a lot of us have already expressed the same concerns but have become tired of wondering if we're even being heard or not. many here just don't want to put up with a bunch of forum drama over sht we don't even know if we can change.
do i foresee dud grenades upon release? yes. will i still play the game? probably. not because my standards are lowered but because theyr aint sht else to play. and dont tell me some crap like BF3 or COD is a good game. I dont care how good the graphics are those are noob games that attract noobs.
i no longer care about the (s)hitbox, i no longer care about the stupid aim assist that should be a toggle which is a flagrant insult to anyone who's been already playing FPS without a fgt aim assist and a broken one at that..
instead of ranting more about the hitbox I dropped my Creo, picked up a Duvolle, skilled up an Eryx, and started kickng fkn ass despite the bad hitbox, despite the RE, now i have the advantage over many because i've learned to kill despite the flaws.
you on the other hand sound like you played 1 or 2 matches to come to your conlcusions, which bear merrit but could have been said in a less ranty way setting the negative tone for the whole thread
does the game/beta suck? kinda. but it doesnt suck bad enough for me to want to go back playing BF3, and that says a fkn lot..
I've had my crusade ranting in other game forums and have learned it's not really worth the effort whether it's constructive or a rant the game has it's own destiny despite the pre puppet show aka beta testing.. you either like it or not,
you're kinda the noob for having rose colored glasses before playing the beta- you should kno by now that all games get overhyped or perhaps you're new to gaming.. |
Boss Dirge
Sanmatar Kelkoons Minmatar Republic
71
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 19:34:00 -
[116] - Quote
Entruv wrote:I did not read all the comments but it's a ******* beta bro chill out. Those are the last things to be implemented.
Oh ya thanks for leaving.
Ever notice they never actually leave? They just complain like two year olds all day and keep coming back. If they actually left they might actually prove their point. |
Abron Garr
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
256
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 19:39:00 -
[117] - Quote
KingBlade82 wrote:Abron Garr wrote:KingBlade82 wrote:im so lost whats so bad about gameplay ik everything i thought was wrong they promised to fix in next build i love the game idk why all of u complain about stuff and dont mention what u think is wrong and all this 180 talk confuses me cause the games not even close to bad enough to ever consider that and i own MW3 and BF3 and played plenty more shooters on the ps3 my trophy rank is lvl 20 and most come from shooters so ive had plenty of experience with judging gameplay and such Hit detection still needs work. The game still feels "clunky" and some actions feel sluggish or non-responsive. can u explain deeper more specific examples ik a few examples of things i dont like r the knives feel awful but im used to either them moving slow but one hit killing or fast so u can spam them but i really dont want a one hit kill knife unless its a melee weapon that specifically is used to destroy people like a giant hammer or sword or axe etc. and crouching seems slow and un-crouching
Sometimes you'll unload a clip into someone and see their shields flashing but they take little or no damage. The reload mechanics need work. Knifing is clunky. Crouch and sprint mechanics need looking into. Weapon switching, tool switching is problematic. Some times you have to press L1 multiple times to get REs to go off. Grenades just not firing. The grenade throw arc is WAY TOO HIGH. Grenade physics are weird. Draw distance is pitiful. Running a tank into a light post damages the tank . Terrain is unrefined and certain areas around hills will cause the player to get stuck. Too easy to get stuck on corners and stairs. Spawn locations are bugged. Numerous quality of life improvements needed. These are just a few issues off the top of my head. Voice comms are bugged. Numerous issues with voice comms tbh. |
boiglios bacon
CAS 514
6
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 19:40:00 -
[118] - Quote
Vicx V wrote:Gelan Corbaine wrote: /facepalm Seriously what do you people think the whole point of testing is ?!!!!! [quote=Garrett Blacknova]You're right! Seriously, stop taking this offensively, listen objectively, I'm trying to make a valid point that if taken seriously might improve the game. I'm not here to hurl random insults and mindless abuse, I do not troll.
Actually..not taking it seriously...but you are since your the one who is ranting about - in your opinion only, how bad it is. And that is the point, it's only your opinion. The reason you can't understand why anyone would like this is because you don't play Eve...so in the end, you just don't get it, because you don't play Eve, or if you do, don't like Eve...but eve is a very different type of game and how it will mesh with dust...makes playing dust very engaging; but if your only a fps guy...you just won't get it. So it's not about being a "fanboy", it's about being able to see and envision how the two go together....which from my experience is superior to any other fps game out there....I guarantee you if I played your favorite fps, I would find it very bland and boring, why?....well cause it's just fps...yawn. |
Iron Wolf Saber
BetaMax.
2867
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 19:42:00 -
[119] - Quote
Add module activation on vehicles to that list
none the less I am going to wait until august patch before I slap down another 101 things that annoy me in dust 514. |
Abron Garr
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
256
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 19:50:00 -
[120] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Add module activation on vehicles to that list
none the less I am going to wait until august patch before I slap down another 101 things that annoy me in dust 514.
There really needs to be a thread of known issues and complaints that is updated often and stickied at the top of both GPD and Bug/TS sub forums. No offense to the CR staff here at CCP, but trying to wade through all the posts of the last few days just to find your issue is annoying, even with the search button. It would also probably alleviate some of the nerd rage if people knew the CCP devs were aware of even the most trivial problems. |
|
Major Assitch
Royal Uhlans Amarr Empire
103
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 19:52:00 -
[121] - Quote
Agree with op! This is pretty terrible even for a work in progress beta. No amount of polish can fix this disaster by release. Sorry to upset u fanboys but this is just awful...beta or not. |
KingBlade82
Crux Special Tasks Group Gallente Federation
56
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 19:53:00 -
[122] - Quote
Abron Garr wrote:KingBlade82 wrote:Abron Garr wrote:KingBlade82 wrote:im so lost whats so bad about gameplay ik everything i thought was wrong they promised to fix in next build i love the game idk why all of u complain about stuff and dont mention what u think is wrong and all this 180 talk confuses me cause the games not even close to bad enough to ever consider that and i own MW3 and BF3 and played plenty more shooters on the ps3 my trophy rank is lvl 20 and most come from shooters so ive had plenty of experience with judging gameplay and such Hit detection still needs work. The game still feels "clunky" and some actions feel sluggish or non-responsive. can u explain deeper more specific examples ik a few examples of things i dont like r the knives feel awful but im used to either them moving slow but one hit killing or fast so u can spam them but i really dont want a one hit kill knife unless its a melee weapon that specifically is used to destroy people like a giant hammer or sword or axe etc. and crouching seems slow and un-crouching Sometimes you'll unload a clip into someone and see their shields flashing but they take little or no damage. The reload mechanics need work. Knifing is clunky. Crouch and sprint mechanics need looking into. Weapon switching, tool switching is problematic. Some times you have to press L1 multiple times to get REs to go off. Grenades just not firing. The grenade throw arc is WAY TOO HIGH. Grenade physics are weird. Draw distance is pitiful. Running a tank into a light post damages the tank . Terrain is unrefined and certain areas around hills will cause the player to get stuck. Too easy to get stuck on corners and stairs. Spawn locations are bugged. Numerous quality of life improvements needed. These are just a few issues off the top of my head. Voice comms are bugged. Numerous issues with voice comms tbh.
some of these r gonna be fixed from what i heard in the next build and yeah grenade is odd even though i get kills with it and weapon switching also needs adjusted it also seems slow to go to secondary but im used to CoD saying switch to ur pistol its faster than reloading :P and if u r a logi u have to go through ur stupid nanohives and stuff to get to ur gun lol |
Iron Wolf Saber
BetaMax.
2867
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 19:53:00 -
[123] - Quote
Major Assitch wrote:Agree with op! This is pretty terrible even for a work in progress beta. No amount of polish can fix this disaster by release. Sorry to upset u fanboys but this is just awful...beta or not.
CCP doesnt use polish, they use jackhammers. You should have seen the amount of rage that happened when they redid the inventory system in eve and basically said, sorry we cant go back now. Also the amount of rage of people who where dropped from support for a video card that was about 12 years old. I felt sorry for the 1% of players with DX8 Cards with shadermodel 1. Then a year later Shader model 2 folks where dropped like a rock.
I can only imagine the amount of rage when CCP annouces they're going to stop support fo the PS3 and move onto the PS4 |
Rorek IronBlood
ZionTCD Legacy Rising
746
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 19:54:00 -
[124] - Quote
Abron Garr wrote:Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Add module activation on vehicles to that list
none the less I am going to wait until august patch before I slap down another 101 things that annoy me in dust 514. There really needs to be a thread of known issues and complaints that is updated often and stickied at the top of both GPD and Bug/TS sub forums. No offense to the CR staff here at CCP, but trying to wade through all the posts of the last few days just to find your issue is annoying, even with the search button. It would also probably alleviate some of the nerd rage if people knew the CCP devs were aware of even the most trivial problems.
Agreed. CCP does need to afford the time to upload some form of documentation. Many of us have stated as such before. |
Iron Wolf Saber
BetaMax.
2867
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 19:57:00 -
[125] - Quote
Rorek IronBlood wrote:Abron Garr wrote:Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Add module activation on vehicles to that list
none the less I am going to wait until august patch before I slap down another 101 things that annoy me in dust 514. There really needs to be a thread of known issues and complaints that is updated often and stickied at the top of both GPD and Bug/TS sub forums. No offense to the CR staff here at CCP, but trying to wade through all the posts of the last few days just to find your issue is annoying, even with the search button. It would also probably alleviate some of the nerd rage if people knew the CCP devs were aware of even the most trivial problems. Agreed. CCP does need to afford the time to upload some form of documentation. Many of us have stated as such before.
I think ccp is a bit more busy getting the game up and going, I mean seriously if you look at 'dev' posts between eve and dust 514, you see more GMs posting here answering questions about game development than the devs are posting. I wonder how they're indrontinating ex-Dice people at CCP to listen to players and possibly talk to them?
BTW Eve online getting software updated on august 8th it wouldnt surprise me if dust 514 does it the same day while everyone is upped up on energy drinks in prepration for patchday gone wrong. |
Fivetimes Infinity
Immobile Infantry
1086
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 20:00:00 -
[126] - Quote
They have months left to work on the game. It's supposed to release "sometime 2012". You're high if you think the state of the game now is a clear indication of how it'll be at release. |
Major Assitch
Royal Uhlans Amarr Empire
103
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 20:00:00 -
[127] - Quote
Oh, and...graphics has nothing to do with it. U just cant fix bad gameplay. |
Iron Wolf Saber
BetaMax.
2867
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 20:01:00 -
[128] - Quote
Major Assitch wrote:Oh, and...graphics has nothing to do with it. U just cant fix bad gameplay.
Actually you can, it involves tearing apart the engine and peicing it back together, or just scrapping it and throwing a newer one in. CCP has gone that far before to the dismay of people with 15 year old lap tops that were once able to run eve.
Hell wouldnt surpsie me if one day they decide to drop unreal engine 3 and go with 4. |
JAG ONE
97
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 20:01:00 -
[129] - Quote
Major Assitch wrote:Agree with op! This is pretty terrible even for a work in progress beta. No amount of polish can fix this disaster by release. Sorry to upset u fanboys but this is just awful...beta or not.
At the current pace of development with a new build every 6 weeks or so, we will probably see 4 more builds before this game gets launched. that's a lot of development effort to fix / polish things off. you guys just need to calm the F down. go play something else if the glitches/bugs annoy you that much. come back for the next build.
but hating on the game and developers and saying that this game will be failure is just LOL stupid..
|
Gauder Berwyck
Deadly Blue Dots RISE of LEGION
217
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 20:02:00 -
[130] - Quote
Haters need to realise that this is a beta, and they have time to fix things.
Fanboys need to realise there is a HELLUVA lot to fix... |
|
Iron Wolf Saber
BetaMax.
2867
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 20:03:00 -
[131] - Quote
Gauder Berwyck wrote:Haters need to realise that this is a beta, and they have time to fix things.
Fanboys need to realise there is a HELLUVA lot to fix...
Oh I know there is alot of fix I have a nice list called 101 bullets in feedback, I havent updated it because, welll... I havent found any new nunances.
Wait scratch that i got a new one, brb going to bump it and link it. |
Knight Of Valor
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
54
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 20:05:00 -
[132] - Quote
Ok, let's say this is a beta. That means they will never fix the game. It will take them 500 years to release the game at the rate they are doing. LOL |
Major Assitch
Royal Uhlans Amarr Empire
103
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 20:06:00 -
[133] - Quote
Fivetimes Infinity wrote:They have months left to work on the game. It's supposed to release "sometime 2012". You're high if you think the state of the game now is a clear indication of how it'll be at release. People always say this in betas but in my experience with betas (and its extensive), they are actually a pretty good indicator of the final product. The release is usually more polished and refined but basic gameplay is the same. Yet there are always people in beta forums spouting how the final will be so much better...they fool themselves. |
Iron Wolf Saber
BetaMax.
2867
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 20:07:00 -
[134] - Quote
https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=26144&find=unread here is my current list of complaints, I only expect a quater of these to be fixed mostly the more serious ones that are counter fun. |
Iron Wolf Saber
BetaMax.
2867
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 20:07:00 -
[135] - Quote
Major Assitch wrote:Fivetimes Infinity wrote:They have months left to work on the game. It's supposed to release "sometime 2012". You're high if you think the state of the game now is a clear indication of how it'll be at release. People always say this in betas but in my experience with betas (and its extensive), they are actually a pretty good indicator of the final product. The release is usually more polished and refined but basic gameplay is the same. Yet there are always people in beta forums spouting how the final will be so much better...they fool themselves.
Did you beta eve online? |
Garma QUDA
Zumari Force Projection Caldari State
468
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 20:12:00 -
[136] - Quote
******* new people. Please, go away so we can keep progressing with the beta. |
XxDreadknotxX
Algintal Core Gallente Federation
4
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 20:13:00 -
[137] - Quote
although sum cod and battlefield titles have shown great graphics and playability at one point they were all in the devolpmental stage...it's the testing that made the game better for it's playability and polishing of it's graphics...it's like cooking...u have to have a nice base to build on...making wild assumtions that the game sucks during it's closed testing phase is absolutly absurd... instead of slammin a game in development how about offering idea's to improve the game it's self.. |
Major Assitch
Royal Uhlans Amarr Empire
103
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 20:14:00 -
[138] - Quote
JAG ONE wrote:Major Assitch wrote:Agree with op! This is pretty terrible even for a work in progress beta. No amount of polish can fix this disaster by release. Sorry to upset u fanboys but this is just awful...beta or not. At the current pace of development with a new build every 6 weeks or so, we will probably see 4 more builds before this game gets launched. that's a lot of development effort to fix / polish things off. you guys just need to calm the F down. go play something else if the glitches/bugs annoy you that much. come back for the next build. but hating on the game and developers and saying that this game will be failure is just LOL stupid.. Its not glitches and bugs thats the problem. Those things are expected in beta. Its not the fact that it needs more polish its the core gameplay thats boring and just plain terrible...they c+ánt fix that without a complete rebuild.
Those of u waiting for some big spectacular changes by release are holding onto false hope. This is the core game and only minor improvements will be made by release. Polish and fixed bugs dont improve the core gameplay. The game is boring and thats not going to change...no matter how much we wish for it. |
Crimson MoonV
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
658
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 20:15:00 -
[139] - Quote
JaZZa01 wrote:Lmao, look at all these fanboys. When somebody says something bad, it's like a child responding with their hands over their ears, "NO NO, BETA, LA LA LA, DUST IS PERFECT."
LOL |
Garma QUDA
Zumari Force Projection Caldari State
468
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 20:15:00 -
[140] - Quote
Major Assitch wrote:JAG ONE wrote:Major Assitch wrote:Agree with op! This is pretty terrible even for a work in progress beta. No amount of polish can fix this disaster by release. Sorry to upset u fanboys but this is just awful...beta or not. At the current pace of development with a new build every 6 weeks or so, we will probably see 4 more builds before this game gets launched. that's a lot of development effort to fix / polish things off. you guys just need to calm the F down. go play something else if the glitches/bugs annoy you that much. come back for the next build. but hating on the game and developers and saying that this game will be failure is just LOL stupid.. Its not glitches and bugs thats the problem. Those things are expected in beta. Its not the fact that it needs more polish its the core gameplay thats boring and just plain terrible...they c+ánt fix that without a complete rebuild. Those of u waiting for some big spectacular changes by release are holding onto false hope. This is the core game and only minor improvements will be made by release. Polish and fixed bugs dont improve the core gameplay. The game is boring and thats not going to change...no matter how much we wish for it.
So when are you going away again? |
|
Major Assitch
Royal Uhlans Amarr Empire
103
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 20:18:00 -
[141] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Major Assitch wrote:Fivetimes Infinity wrote:They have months left to work on the game. It's supposed to release "sometime 2012". You're high if you think the state of the game now is a clear indication of how it'll be at release. People always say this in betas but in my experience with betas (and its extensive), they are actually a pretty good indicator of the final product. The release is usually more polished and refined but basic gameplay is the same. Yet there are always people in beta forums spouting how the final will be so much better...they fool themselves. Did you beta eve online? This isnt EVE online...its a PS3 fps. And its terrible! Maybe u EvE players are happy with boring...I prefer action and excitement in my shooters. |
Abron Garr
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
256
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 20:19:00 -
[142] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=26144&find=unread here is my current list of complaints, I only expect a quater of these to be fixed mostly the more serious ones that are counter fun.
Nice, hopefully we can get it stickied. |
Rorek IronBlood
ZionTCD Legacy Rising
746
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 20:20:00 -
[143] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Rorek IronBlood wrote:Abron Garr wrote:Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Add module activation on vehicles to that list
none the less I am going to wait until august patch before I slap down another 101 things that annoy me in dust 514. There really needs to be a thread of known issues and complaints that is updated often and stickied at the top of both GPD and Bug/TS sub forums. No offense to the CR staff here at CCP, but trying to wade through all the posts of the last few days just to find your issue is annoying, even with the search button. It would also probably alleviate some of the nerd rage if people knew the CCP devs were aware of even the most trivial problems. Agreed. CCP does need to afford the time to upload some form of documentation. Many of us have stated as such before. I think ccp is a bit more busy getting the game up and going, I mean seriously if you look at 'dev' posts between eve and dust 514, you see more GMs posting here answering questions about game development than the devs are posting. I wonder how they're indrontinating ex-Dice people at CCP to listen to players and possibly talk to them? BTW Eve online getting software updated on august 8th it wouldnt surprise me if dust 514 does it the same day while everyone is upped up on energy drinks in prepration for patchday gone wrong.
Good eye on the EVE Online side. That would be neat to see if they happen to release both updates around or on the same date. However in terms of GM to DEV -- Usually they are both under the same roof. Just different departments. What needs to happen in this case is internal communication so that GM (General Managment) can cordinate, talk, and respond to us. Communication is always an essential and intregal part, or form. We the players could use some communication. It would at the very least help relieve some stress within the community. |
Major Assitch
Royal Uhlans Amarr Empire
103
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 20:21:00 -
[144] - Quote
Crimson MoonV wrote:JaZZa01 wrote:Lmao, look at all these fanboys. When somebody says something bad, it's like a child responding with their hands over their ears, "NO NO, BETA, LA LA LA, DUST IS PERFECT."
LOL LOL...so true! |
Brahma El Indio
Bragian Order Amarr Empire
171
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 20:27:00 -
[145] - Quote
Face it, people, that if the game fails on ps3 its headed to PC where it won't fail.....CCP must have an out of exclusive clause with Sony which can be exercised after a period of time if numbers and revenue miss the projected targets.....
The game will go on, it may be that the game is too deep, mature and complex for console gamers....
The game play in this build can get boring, but I must say I have enjoyed my time on the Asian server so far. It is funny how when hit detection works and lag reduces, that the game becomes more playable despite the obvious issues on the current skirmish map.
|
Garma QUDA
Zumari Force Projection Caldari State
468
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 20:29:00 -
[146] - Quote
Brahma El Indio wrote:Face it, people, that if the game fails on ps3 its headed to PC where it won't fail.....CCP must have an out of exclusive clause with Sony which can be exercised after a period of time if numbers and revenue miss the projected targets.....
The game will go on, it may be that the game is too deep, mature and complex for console gamers....
The game play in this build can get boring, but I must say I have enjoyed my time on the Asian server so far. It is funny how when hit detection works and lag reduces, that the game becomes more playable despite the obvious issues on the current skirmish map.
Ok |
Iron Wolf Saber
BetaMax.
2867
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 20:30:00 -
[147] - Quote
Major Assitch wrote:Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Major Assitch wrote:Fivetimes Infinity wrote:They have months left to work on the game. It's supposed to release "sometime 2012". You're high if you think the state of the game now is a clear indication of how it'll be at release. People always say this in betas but in my experience with betas (and its extensive), they are actually a pretty good indicator of the final product. The release is usually more polished and refined but basic gameplay is the same. Yet there are always people in beta forums spouting how the final will be so much better...they fool themselves. Did you beta eve online? This isnt EVE online...its a PS3 fps. And its terrible! Maybe u EvE players are happy with boring...I prefer action and excitement in my shooters.
Yet eve online's beta wasnt like any other pc's betas either for an mmo. There was only 2 factions and like 90 star sytems. Hell there was a ship in it that like never made it in that I acutally liked (it looked like a sunfish) Heck Null sec didnt exit, tutorials didnt exist (well after launch) lots and lots of things in eve didnt exist back then, like battleships.
The thing is the beta from eve looks a hell lot like dust 514s in terms of progress, how things work, how updates are made, how feedback is treated and how the much of the game shaped by the testers. |
Iron Wolf Saber
BetaMax.
2867
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 20:33:00 -
[148] - Quote
Rorek IronBlood wrote: Good eye on the EVE Online side. That would be neat to see if they happen to release both updates around or on the same date. However in terms of GM to DEV -- Usually they are both under the same roof. Just different departments. What needs to happen in this case is internal communication so that GM (General Managment) can cordinate, talk, and respond to us. Communication is always an essential and intregal part, or form. We the players could use some communication. It would at the very least help relieve some stress within the community.
Honestly its not the first time eve online had longer than usual downtime because it was dust 514's fault. Its been happening a bit more lately. Current eve downtime averages about 15 minutes or less though daily so who knows.
As for the GMs I expect they're more of a support role still in this game just right now there isnt much of a community to watch over so they're being barrowed to help develop the game probably via tools feedback and are more involved than usual. I mean look at CCP Cmnd Wang even though hes community guy for dust 514 hes way over his head on being busy elsewhere. |
Rorek IronBlood
ZionTCD Legacy Rising
746
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 20:34:00 -
[149] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Major Assitch wrote:Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Major Assitch wrote:Fivetimes Infinity wrote:They have months left to work on the game. It's supposed to release "sometime 2012". You're high if you think the state of the game now is a clear indication of how it'll be at release. People always say this in betas but in my experience with betas (and its extensive), they are actually a pretty good indicator of the final product. The release is usually more polished and refined but basic gameplay is the same. Yet there are always people in beta forums spouting how the final will be so much better...they fool themselves. Did you beta eve online? This isnt EVE online...its a PS3 fps. And its terrible! Maybe u EvE players are happy with boring...I prefer action and excitement in my shooters. Yet eve online's beta wasnt like any other pc's betas either for an mmo. There was only 2 factions and like 90 star sytems. Hell there was a ship in it that like never made it in that I acutally liked (it looked like a sunfish) Heck Null sec didnt exit, tutorials didnt exist (well after launch) lots and lots of things in eve didnt exist back then, like battleships. The thing is the beta from eve looks a hell lot like dust 514s in terms of progress, how things work, how updates are made, how feedback is treated and how the much of the game shaped by the testers.
Off topic, but was wondering if you happened to be a Stargate fan or a fan of another Sci-fi series? Loved the Alteran ships.
Edit:
Iron Wolf Saber, Sadly as I have reported I have never been able to afford the luxury funds, to play EVE Online. Though I know someone who does personally, and I have always been a fan of Gallente (I love the Talos Fast Attack Ship.) Still thank you, for the info. |
JAG ONE
97
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 20:35:00 -
[150] - Quote
Major Assitch wrote:JAG ONE wrote:Major Assitch wrote:Agree with op! This is pretty terrible even for a work in progress beta. No amount of polish can fix this disaster by release. Sorry to upset u fanboys but this is just awful...beta or not. At the current pace of development with a new build every 6 weeks or so, we will probably see 4 more builds before this game gets launched. that's a lot of development effort to fix / polish things off. you guys just need to calm the F down. go play something else if the glitches/bugs annoy you that much. come back for the next build. but hating on the game and developers and saying that this game will be failure is just LOL stupid.. Its not glitches and bugs thats the problem. Those things are expected in beta. Its not the fact that it needs more polish its the core gameplay thats boring and just plain terrible...they c+ánt fix that without a complete rebuild. Those of u waiting for some big spectacular changes by release are holding onto false hope. This is the core game and only minor improvements will be made by release. Polish and fixed bugs dont improve the core gameplay. The game is boring and thats not going to change...no matter how much we wish for it.
So what is it about the game play that you dislike? seems to be pretty standard FPS stuff, shooting people, blowing stuff up. I'm a little confused about what you find boring.. please enlighten us all about exciting game play!
|
|
Iron Wolf Saber
BetaMax.
2867
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 20:41:00 -
[151] - Quote
Rorek IronBlood wrote:
Off topic, but was wondering if you happened to be a Stargate fan or a fan of another Sci-fi series? Loved the Alteran ships.
Enjoyed the following: Bablyon 5 first few seasons, Battlestar Galactia - TNS but season 3 was boring, Star Trek Next Gen, Voyager, Enterprise. Robotech/Macross, Macross +, Macross 2, Macross Zero, Macross Frontier, Adromeda, Martian Successor Nedesco, Slowly getting into Starblazers but its really dated and hard to appreciate. Bookwise only appreciated Honor Harrigton Series lately.
On that note Star Trek is a love/hate relationship : I applaud thier social interactions a bit, I boo thier military (or lack therfore of) mindedness.
I personally like the gallente myrmdon and hyperion designs. However Megathron holds a special 'omfg I am going to raep you' look to it.
I got hopes for dust, I just fear not everyone has the paitence to deal with ccp's pacing at times and thier odd knack for pushing back features to make room another feature made it in right.
I do see ccp focusing on at least getting the following down by launch as its thier crieteria
Hammering out gun play Hammering out controls Hammering out phsyics Getting Factional Wafare Functional Getting Social and Corproate Functional
From there they have a bare bones launch game and from there they can keep adding stuff in.
If i remember right caldari and amarr where the first two factions in eve online before the got the gallente and minmatar in from the beta era. By launch they had at least factional symetry something I dont see happening with dust 514 as they can get away with not everyone having a tank, dropsuit, or thier version of an assault rifle.
I do remember isk was printed out of thin air as much back then in new eden either and the first battleship ever destroyed in new eden can only afford to fit cruiser weapons on it. |
whoshotcha79
15
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 20:42:00 -
[152] - Quote
the gameplay is damn fun if you ask many of us andas for people who dont know any better I would nrt my last dollar I have way more fps experience than you and what part of the gameplay being not fun that's your opinion and as for weapons looking the same its not going to be that way in the final build so please by all means please leave you are not needed you dont understand the way this works its.testing gameplay right noww not if you like it or not good riddance to you and your kind sir ccp keep doing an amazing job the real gamers know this will be something truely special thank you |
Abron Garr
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
256
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 20:45:00 -
[153] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Rorek IronBlood wrote:
Off topic, but was wondering if you happened to be a Stargate fan or a fan of another Sci-fi series? Loved the Alteran ships.
Enjoyed the following: Bablyon 5 first few seasons, Battlestar Galactia - TNS but season 3 was boring, Star Trek Next Gen, Voyager, Enterprise. Robotech/Macross, Macross +, Macross 2, Macross Zero, Macross Frontier, Adromeda, Martian Successor Nedesco, Slowly getting into Starblazers but its really dated and hard to appreciate. Bookwise only appreciated Honor Harrigton Series lately. On that note Star Trek is a love/hate relationship : I applaud thier social interactions a bit, I boo thier military (or lack therfore of) mindedness. I got hopes for dust, I just fear not everyone has the paitence to deal with ccp's pacing at times and thier odd knack for pushing back features to make room another feature made it in right. I do see ccp focusing on at least getting the following down by launch as its thier crieteria Hammering out gun play Hammering out controls Hammering out phsyics Getting Factional Wafare Functional Getting Social and Corproate Functional From there they have a bare bones launch game and from there they can keep adding stuff in.
That's why DS9 was my favorite. Sisko wasn't afraid to get dirty to save the Federation. |
Rorek IronBlood
ZionTCD Legacy Rising
746
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 20:47:00 -
[154] - Quote
Battlestar: Gallactica was too much of a soap to me, but then again at times so was Star Trek at times. I enjoyed though a number of the series you listed. Not all of them due to either not having gotten to them, or another reason. Ha-ha. Still I agree with you on terms of CCP and Dust514. They should be able to pound out most issues before launch.
Well here is to hope I suppose.
Things do need patching, and tweeking. However we'll just have to see what CCP has done first come this upcoming thursday? Atleast I would hope soon for the next build. I have no honest official date. Could certainly hope for thursday though? Ha-ha. |
Rorek IronBlood
ZionTCD Legacy Rising
746
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 20:52:00 -
[155] - Quote
Abron Garr wrote:Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Rorek IronBlood wrote:
Off topic, but was wondering if you happened to be a Stargate fan or a fan of another Sci-fi series? Loved the Alteran ships.
Enjoyed the following: Bablyon 5 first few seasons, Battlestar Galactia - TNS but season 3 was boring, Star Trek Next Gen, Voyager, Enterprise. Robotech/Macross, Macross +, Macross 2, Macross Zero, Macross Frontier, Adromeda, Martian Successor Nedesco, Slowly getting into Starblazers but its really dated and hard to appreciate. Bookwise only appreciated Honor Harrigton Series lately. On that note Star Trek is a love/hate relationship : I applaud thier social interactions a bit, I boo thier military (or lack therfore of) mindedness. I got hopes for dust, I just fear not everyone has the paitence to deal with ccp's pacing at times and thier odd knack for pushing back features to make room another feature made it in right. I do see ccp focusing on at least getting the following down by launch as its thier crieteria Hammering out gun play Hammering out controls Hammering out phsyics Getting Factional Wafare Functional Getting Social and Corproate Functional From there they have a bare bones launch game and from there they can keep adding stuff in. That's why DS9 was my favorite. Sisko wasn't afraid to get dirty to save the Federation.
A lot of fans of Star Trek dislikes how gritty, and dark Star Trek: Deep Space Nine was, but I loved it! Netflix allowed me to finally watch all episodes start to finish, and it was even better. Also (The) Sisco, disliked Picard greatly. More so then anything for what he did as a borg (Lacutest of Borg). Still after going back and watching every series I enjoyed it the most next to Star Trek: The Original Series. The military aspect of Star Trek was also best in those two series. I loved the stories though, and as pointed out before the character dialogue and progression. |
L1BERT1NE X
Osmon Surveillance Caldari State
26
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 20:52:00 -
[156] - Quote
Chihiro Itto wrote:People who say they dislike a game then spend their time on that game's forums instead of doing something else with their lives make me larf.
Pretty much this. You said you were done. I understand your points. Now, show your sincerity by going away.
Dear OP,
I know you're playing other games. I'm OK with that. I've moved on. You should move on, too. I don't need you getting on me two weeks from now at 2am just because your drunk and you want to shoot something. You're just showing your lack of respect for both of us. Stop logging on and leaving me messages. You're better than that.
Stop interfering with my other relationships. Believe it or not some people do like to hang out with me and can do so without all the drama. I know I'm not perfect, but neither are you. The difference is, I'm trying to better myself, I want something more and I thought you did, too.
Maybe when you're not so hurt you might stop running around telling everyone how horrible I am.
And it's not about the size of your controller. Seriously, you're input was just fine.
I hope you'll be happy someday.
Love,
Dusty
*EDIT* Hey, I can post again! Good, I have all this pent up snarkiness... |
Iron Wolf Saber
BetaMax.
2867
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 20:59:00 -
[157] - Quote
its more like other people want to use the tv the ps3 is on. and that I ran out of isk to do collision testing wiht. |
Baal Roo
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
811
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 21:00:00 -
[158] - Quote
Alkai Chromision wrote:Dewie Cheecham wrote:JaZZa01 wrote:I promise you there are hundreds of threads with legitimate criticism and ideas to fix the game, that are buried 50 pages back. All the developers will read is the first few pages, full of "DUST APPRECIATION", "GREAT JOB CCP, LOOKIN FORWARD TO IT" threads, which the silly players continue to reinforce, overlooking the big problems. There is a difference you are forgetting. The appreciative comments are the ones applauding progress. And there have been a lot of that. But criticism comes in many forms, and the threads that want DUST to be more like other, old games, are generally not to be taken seriously at all. Not that DUST can't learn from their successes and failures, it should, but the entire foundation of DUST is just too alien for it to be like CoD, BF, Halo or other existing games. DUST is the first FPS that have made me laugh, smile, frown and rage. Inside a minute. I was bored with CoD after an hour. An hour of really trying. Not all criticisms want a game to be like CoD or BF, or MoH, or any others. I wanted to like this game because it was different. I'm great at CoD, good at BF3, was great a Homefront..... I wanted this game because it was different and I wanted it to be. We don't need more of the same. There will be more CoD and more BF no question. My qualms with the game are all gameplay related. Not graphics, not because there's no throwing knives or killstreaks, or anything else. There are valid points for and against the game, for me the pros don't outweigh the cons. And these forums are for those who have tested this product to voice their opinions. Not to voice there opinions on a finished product but to voice their opinions on a beta. So then why are people upset because other people have an opinion on a beta?
Well, the problem is that this beta still has the better part of a year's worth of development and improvements ahead of it, but people like the OP treat it likes it's a finished product. Just look at the basic gameplay improvements that we got from the last build to the current build, and then realize the developers are currently 2 or 3 builds out ahead of the one we are currently playing. We don't have proper spawn mechanics yet, probably less than half the gear, we've got 3 out of 7,000 maps, no corporations, no market, no grouping, no PvE, no player contracts, low res unfinished graphics and textures, unfinished optimization for draw distance, etc, etc. Anyone who thinks they can make judgements calls yet on whether or not this game will be "good" upon release is CLEARLY talking out of their ass.
That doesn't mean there aren't problems, there are TONS of problems, but that's the point of this beta. It's just "this game sucks, it's not as good as games A, B, or C that are all finished products" is a clear indicator that someone doesn't have a proper grasp on what they are talking about. It's like watching The Joy Of Painting for the first 10 minutes and saying "That doesn't look anything like a lake surrounded by trees with mountains in the background, Bob Ross sucks and that painting looks like gibberish and will never look like anything other than blobs of paint" and then changing the channel.
If you've got problems with how the beta plays then at least post in the feedback section. When someone comes into General Discussions and fills their thread with ignorant statements and incorrect assumptions, they shouldn't expect anyone to take the legitimate criticisms they sprinkle in seriously.
Also, I'm no fanboy. I've never played EVE, and frankly, I don't give a **** if Dust succeeds or fails. It's a free game, so if it sucks I simply won't play it, but at this point in the beta it's impossible to say how the final release will look. |
Abron Garr
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
256
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 21:30:00 -
[159] - Quote
Rorek IronBlood wrote:Abron Garr wrote:Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Rorek IronBlood wrote:
Off topic, but was wondering if you happened to be a Stargate fan or a fan of another Sci-fi series? Loved the Alteran ships.
Enjoyed the following: Bablyon 5 first few seasons, Battlestar Galactia - TNS but season 3 was boring, Star Trek Next Gen, Voyager, Enterprise. Robotech/Macross, Macross +, Macross 2, Macross Zero, Macross Frontier, Adromeda, Martian Successor Nedesco, Slowly getting into Starblazers but its really dated and hard to appreciate. Bookwise only appreciated Honor Harrigton Series lately. On that note Star Trek is a love/hate relationship : I applaud thier social interactions a bit, I boo thier military (or lack therfore of) mindedness. I got hopes for dust, I just fear not everyone has the paitence to deal with ccp's pacing at times and thier odd knack for pushing back features to make room another feature made it in right. I do see ccp focusing on at least getting the following down by launch as its thier crieteria Hammering out gun play Hammering out controls Hammering out phsyics Getting Factional Wafare Functional Getting Social and Corproate Functional From there they have a bare bones launch game and from there they can keep adding stuff in. That's why DS9 was my favorite. Sisko wasn't afraid to get dirty to save the Federation. A lot of fans of Star Trek dislikes how gritty, and dark Star Trek: Deep Space Nine was, but I loved it! Netflix allowed me to finally watch all episodes start to finish, and it was even better. Also (The) Sisco, disliked Picard greatly. More so then anything for what he did as a borg (Lacutest of Borg). Still after going back and watching every series I enjoyed it the most next to Star Trek: The Original Series. The military aspect of Star Trek was also best in those two series. I loved the stories though, and as pointed out before the character dialogue and progression.
The writing was exquisite. Episodes like In the Pale Moonlight, Paradise Lost, Inter Arma Enim Silent Leges (all the Section 31 episodes were badass), and Homefront are probably my top favorites. The writers were very prescient too. I remember re-watching Homefront/Paradise Lost a few years after 9/11 and just thinking..."Wow". |
DON RODIE II
Deep Space Republic
168
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 21:42:00 -
[160] - Quote
I like this game. It just feels super deep, which I perfer. I played bf3 beta and a lot of people said the game sucked. Sure battlefield 3 beta did sucked. But now its has to be the best first person shooter out right now. Battlefield 3 beta was horrible. It was worser then this beta. I will never forget swimming under the map and they would not let you aim your gun properly, yet along walk right. A lot people missing out on BF3 for that cod piece of shyt. I think a lot of people will miss out on this game if they can't accept that is in it's beta and not the final verison. |
|
Iron Wolf Saber
BetaMax.
2867
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 21:47:00 -
[161] - Quote
TBH I think the eve online dust fans are much harsher on dust 514 than cod hateboys are. |
Mobius Wyvern
BetaMax.
1216
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 21:47:00 -
[162] - Quote
How far off topic can this thread go? We are placing bets. 1 million ISK says this thread is locked for off-topic by 1200 GMT tomorrow. |
Mr Funless
Seituoda Taskforce Command Caldari State
191
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 21:50:00 -
[163] - Quote
The EVE stuff is great. I love the customization to it. Making the perfect setup, having limited funds, potential to hookup with EVE, etc. The actual game play (you know, shooting stuff) should be much better for a game 3 years into development. It's going to be at least a year after release till it's in a really playable state. |
Iron Wolf Saber
BetaMax.
2867
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 21:51:00 -
[164] - Quote
Who like Sonic the Hedghog? |
Iron Wolf Saber
BetaMax.
2867
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 21:52:00 -
[165] - Quote
Mr Funless wrote:The EVE stuff is great. I love the customization to it. Making the perfect setup, having limited funds, potential to hookup with EVE, etc. The actual game play (you know, shooting stuff) should be much better for a game 3 years into development. It's going to be at least a year after release till it's in a really playable state.
At least dust 514 better caters to the instant action folks like myself.
As ccp put it in a way, the ability to experince new eden from a not so boring angle. |
thereal herbzula
Sanmatar Kelkoons Minmatar Republic
62
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 21:57:00 -
[166] - Quote
Mobius Wyvern wrote:How far off topic can this thread go? We are placing bets. 1 million ISK says this thread is locked for off-topic by 1200 GMT tomorrow.
I dont understand y this thread is still up. People crying about a unfinished product...... How lame lol
Its like getting mad at McDonalds for not making your Big Mac the way you want it before you even order.
GTFO if you dont like it, save everyone the headace, your just wasting forum space that can be used for something constructive.
Oh, ill take that bet Mobius! |
thereal herbzula
Sanmatar Kelkoons Minmatar Republic
62
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 21:58:00 -
[167] - Quote
Weird double post somehow? |
thereal herbzula
Sanmatar Kelkoons Minmatar Republic
62
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 22:01:00 -
[168] - Quote
Mr Funless wrote:The EVE stuff is great. I love the customization to it. Making the perfect setup, having limited funds, potential to hookup with EVE, etc. The actual game play (you know, shooting stuff) should be much better for a game 3 years into development. It's going to be at least a year after release till it's in a really playable state.
We are playing it right now, so you are dumb. lol |
Rorek IronBlood
ZionTCD Legacy Rising
746
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 22:02:00 -
[169] - Quote
Mobius Wyvern wrote:How far off topic can this thread go? We are placing bets. 1 million ISK says this thread is locked for off-topic by 1200 GMT tomorrow.
I'll admit I was off topic for a number of posts. I somewhat apologise for it, but really the conversation was much better anyway then what this thread was trying to do -- stir and rile and vex the people. Even if the original poster's intentions were genuine and meant for a better they nonetheless came off as someone just offering nothing more then insults towards the game, and the developers. I saw very little constructive criticism in way of conversation towards the topic at hand.
We all understand the game is far from complete, or perfect. The divide however is in how people seem to act. We're not fanboys, or blind to the problems. Some of us are just more patient, and understanding. Willing to wait and see as we fulfill our duty as [beta] testers as best we can. By being civil and calmly voicing our concerns and opinions in a rational manner. This thread was anything, but that. However it only got worse from there on both sides. Especially in terms of name calling, judging, and throwing accusations at one another.
Calling someone a fanboy is childish. The problem there is that I believe both sides want to better the game just going about in two very different ways. One side is about being as loud and obnoxious as possible while being unable to wait, and then you have us who come off (maybe) as if we are blind to the situation, but we're not. we do say what we want, and what we feel is wrong. We're just more calm about it. This however does account for everyone on either side. Some people are trying troll the forums as best to their ability, and do not care for the game's well being, and some are blind to the problem. Not because, they are a fanboy or anything, but more likely because, they may feel it's not so bad or not worth noting at the very least.
Anyway.... Sorr for babling somewhat, but I just figured I'd throw some input out there on the matter of communication problems. Though as I stated in the past it would help to see some proper documentation from GM, or the DEV's. Even just enough to lessen the tension on here. |
KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf
Seraphim Initiative. CRONOS.
3064
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 22:06:00 -
[170] - Quote
To the OP: Your post is useless.
1_ You don't post feedback here, you post it there: https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=topics&f=730 2_ Be specific and throrough about what aspects of gameplay is flawed, how its flawed, and how it could be improved. 3_ As long as graphics are tolerable, it doesn't matter. |
|
Abron Garr
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
256
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 22:46:00 -
[171] - Quote
Rorek IronBlood wrote:Mobius Wyvern wrote:How far off topic can this thread go? We are placing bets. 1 million ISK says this thread is locked for off-topic by 1200 GMT tomorrow. I'll admit I was off topic for a number of posts. I somewhat apologise for it, but really the conversation was much better anyway then what this thread was trying to do -- stir and rile and vex the people. Even if the original poster's intentions were genuine and meant for a better they nonetheless came off as someone just offering nothing more then insults towards the game, and the developers. I saw very little constructive criticism in way of conversation towards the topic at hand. We all understand the game is far from complete, or perfect. The divide however is in how people seem to act. We're not fanboys, or blind to the problems. Some of us are just more patient, and understanding. Willing to wait and see as we fulfill our duty as [beta] testers as best we can. By being civil and calmly voicing our concerns and opinions in a rational manner. This thread was anything, but that. However it only got worse from there on both sides. Especially in terms of name calling, judging, and throwing accusations at one another. Calling someone a fanboy is childish. The problem there is that I believe both sides want to better the game just going about in two very different ways. One side is about being as loud and obnoxious as possible while being unable to wait, and then you have us who come off (maybe) as if we are blind to the situation, but we're not. we do say what we want, and what we feel is wrong. We're just more calm about it. This however does account for everyone on either side. Some people are trying troll the forums as best to their ability, and do not care for the game's well being, and some are blind to the problem. Not because, they are a fanboy or anything, but more likely because, they may feel it's not so bad or not worth noting at the very least. Anyway.... Sorr for babling somewhat, but I just figured I'd throw some input out there on the matter of communication problems. Though as I stated in the past it would help to see some proper documentation from GM, or the DEV's. Even just enough to lessen the tension on here.
Don't apologize to these assholes. This thread's OP was about as far from constructive as it could possibly be. It might as well be full of Fantasy Football picks from 3 seasons ago.
|
Kaeralli Sturmovos
KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION
117
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 22:48:00 -
[172] - Quote
another tester rushing opinions in a BETA |
Rorek IronBlood
ZionTCD Legacy Rising
746
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 22:51:00 -
[173] - Quote
Abron Garr wrote:Rorek IronBlood wrote:Mobius Wyvern wrote:How far off topic can this thread go? We are placing bets. 1 million ISK says this thread is locked for off-topic by 1200 GMT tomorrow. I'll admit I was off topic for a number of posts. I somewhat apologise for it, but really the conversation was much better anyway then what this thread was trying to do -- stir and rile and vex the people. Even if the original poster's intentions were genuine and meant for a better they nonetheless came off as someone just offering nothing more then insults towards the game, and the developers. I saw very little constructive criticism in way of conversation towards the topic at hand. We all understand the game is far from complete, or perfect. The divide however is in how people seem to act. We're not fanboys, or blind to the problems. Some of us are just more patient, and understanding. Willing to wait and see as we fulfill our duty as [beta] testers as best we can. By being civil and calmly voicing our concerns and opinions in a rational manner. This thread was anything, but that. However it only got worse from there on both sides. Especially in terms of name calling, judging, and throwing accusations at one another. Calling someone a fanboy is childish. The problem there is that I believe both sides want to better the game just going about in two very different ways. One side is about being as loud and obnoxious as possible while being unable to wait, and then you have us who come off (maybe) as if we are blind to the situation, but we're not. we do say what we want, and what we feel is wrong. We're just more calm about it. This however does account for everyone on either side. Some people are trying troll the forums as best to their ability, and do not care for the game's well being, and some are blind to the problem. Not because, they are a fanboy or anything, but more likely because, they may feel it's not so bad or not worth noting at the very least. Anyway.... Sorr for babling somewhat, but I just figured I'd throw some input out there on the matter of communication problems. Though as I stated in the past it would help to see some proper documentation from GM, or the DEV's. Even just enough to lessen the tension on here. Don't apologize to these assholes. This thread's OP was about as far from constructive as it could possibly be. It might as well be full of Fantasy Football picks from 3 seasons ago.
I really was not so much apologising other then being slightly off topic when I started talking about Sci-fi, and whatnot. Just trying to offer an opinon on why the community is divided as such. I cannot and do not speak for all though as I pointed out. There will always be variables outside the norm, or known that are harder to pin down. I did mention the original posting being a bit harsh though, and offering very little constructiveness to the game.
It's okay though. I mean people have an opinion. I know at times I fly off the handle myself, make stupid comments, or attack back when prevoked. I'm human just as much as everyone else here. I know people that include myself we just get to a point where you cannot take the same sort of posting or thread anymore. They get tired of being reminded it's a [beta], and some of us get tired of the negativity. It happens. I'm guilty of going off a couple of times on such matters. |
Fatal HeD
Osmon Surveillance Caldari State
2
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 23:24:00 -
[174] - Quote
I wish I could quote every idiot here but the OP takes the cake so to him and all like him:
- Please leave the game and come back later if you really believe that what you are playing is unacceptable (keeping in mind that you likely paid nothing to participate in a closed BETA)
- If you do not believe that CCP can and will majorly change things before the release of this game ask any EVE player who has participated in the test server before a major expansion release. The planetary mining system was basically scrapped and reworked months before its release and its not abnormal for them to re-work major parts of their games to get it right. I am not saying this will happen or even that it needs a major overhaul but it is more than possible.
- The maps and graphics you are seeing now most likely mean basically nothing please stop complaining about them. This is to include most talks of spawn camping at least until they implement installations. And as far as graphics goes if you have ever seen that shiny trailer with the orbital strike from the planet...the programming for that actually exists i.e. that is actual gameplay complete with real in-game graphics and effects. By and large CCP's trailers tend to be of actual gameplay the only difference being the camera angles they are able to capture the gameplay from so if you want a sample of what finalized graphics will look like please re-watch a DUST trailer with that in mind.
- Dust is far from perfect (in its current form its not even that good tbh) and CCP is very new at this that being said all feedback and criticism is good even if it really just amounts to non-sense and/or whining. But if would def be nice if posters could at least make it up to that level. If you feel the need to get on your computer, log on to these forums, and spend 10-30 mins typing just to complain about how mad you are about a GAME that hasn't even been completed yet regardless of how 'close' you may feel it is to completion. You should probably turn off your playstation, shut down your computer and smack yourself in the face as hard as you can and reflect on some life decisions. |
Raynor Ragna
266
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 23:27:00 -
[175] - Quote
It amazes me that people are trolling these forums. This is a Beta, we are here to help CCP. If you aren't helping, you guys should leave. |
Abron Garr
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
256
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 23:31:00 -
[176] - Quote
Raynor Ragna wrote:It amazes me that people are trolling these forums. This is a Beta, we are here to help CCP. If you aren't helping, you guys should leave.
I agree. |
Templar Two
Villore Sec Ops Gallente Federation
459
|
Posted - 2012.07.30 08:36:00 -
[177] - Quote
EnglishSnake wrote:
Ye id rarther take the word of ccp rarther than a mag tbh
So an interview with CCP on a VG site is not a reliable source! |
|
CCP Frame
Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire
351
|
Posted - 2012.07.30 08:45:00 -
[178] - Quote
For all your constructive criticism, feedback and suggestions head over to feedback forums. And please read the forum rules. Thank you. |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 :: [one page] |