|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Rorek IronBlood
ZionTCD Legacy Rising
746
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 15:25:00 -
[1] - Quote
EnglishSnake wrote:This thread is just 1 clusterfuck with no constructive anything in it
Should let it die tbh
That sums up what the forums have been like all morning. Nothing, but trolls, circle jerking, and other ignorant fools ranting, raging, and clogging up the forums.
Stupidity this morning is rampant. |
Rorek IronBlood
ZionTCD Legacy Rising
746
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 15:33:00 -
[2] - Quote
ReGnUm DEl wrote:Rorek IronBlood wrote:EnglishSnake wrote:This thread is just 1 clusterfuck with no constructive anything in it
Should let it die tbh That sums up what the forums have been like all morning. Nothing, but trolls, circle jerking, and other ignorant fools ranting, raging, and clogging up the forums. Stupidity this morning is rampant. HeZ HAz no gun game so all he do is type on ForumZ
Uh-huh. Okay troll. Say what you want. All I see is some pathetic tween with no life outside of what self gratification and validation he can get from flaunting, and stroking e-peen.
Your move, ma'am. |
Rorek IronBlood
ZionTCD Legacy Rising
746
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 19:54:00 -
[3] - Quote
Abron Garr wrote:Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Add module activation on vehicles to that list
none the less I am going to wait until august patch before I slap down another 101 things that annoy me in dust 514. There really needs to be a thread of known issues and complaints that is updated often and stickied at the top of both GPD and Bug/TS sub forums. No offense to the CR staff here at CCP, but trying to wade through all the posts of the last few days just to find your issue is annoying, even with the search button. It would also probably alleviate some of the nerd rage if people knew the CCP devs were aware of even the most trivial problems.
Agreed. CCP does need to afford the time to upload some form of documentation. Many of us have stated as such before. |
Rorek IronBlood
ZionTCD Legacy Rising
746
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 20:20:00 -
[4] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Rorek IronBlood wrote:Abron Garr wrote:Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Add module activation on vehicles to that list
none the less I am going to wait until august patch before I slap down another 101 things that annoy me in dust 514. There really needs to be a thread of known issues and complaints that is updated often and stickied at the top of both GPD and Bug/TS sub forums. No offense to the CR staff here at CCP, but trying to wade through all the posts of the last few days just to find your issue is annoying, even with the search button. It would also probably alleviate some of the nerd rage if people knew the CCP devs were aware of even the most trivial problems. Agreed. CCP does need to afford the time to upload some form of documentation. Many of us have stated as such before. I think ccp is a bit more busy getting the game up and going, I mean seriously if you look at 'dev' posts between eve and dust 514, you see more GMs posting here answering questions about game development than the devs are posting. I wonder how they're indrontinating ex-Dice people at CCP to listen to players and possibly talk to them? BTW Eve online getting software updated on august 8th it wouldnt surprise me if dust 514 does it the same day while everyone is upped up on energy drinks in prepration for patchday gone wrong.
Good eye on the EVE Online side. That would be neat to see if they happen to release both updates around or on the same date. However in terms of GM to DEV -- Usually they are both under the same roof. Just different departments. What needs to happen in this case is internal communication so that GM (General Managment) can cordinate, talk, and respond to us. Communication is always an essential and intregal part, or form. We the players could use some communication. It would at the very least help relieve some stress within the community. |
Rorek IronBlood
ZionTCD Legacy Rising
746
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 20:34:00 -
[5] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Major Assitch wrote:Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Major Assitch wrote:Fivetimes Infinity wrote:They have months left to work on the game. It's supposed to release "sometime 2012". You're high if you think the state of the game now is a clear indication of how it'll be at release. People always say this in betas but in my experience with betas (and its extensive), they are actually a pretty good indicator of the final product. The release is usually more polished and refined but basic gameplay is the same. Yet there are always people in beta forums spouting how the final will be so much better...they fool themselves. Did you beta eve online? This isnt EVE online...its a PS3 fps. And its terrible! Maybe u EvE players are happy with boring...I prefer action and excitement in my shooters. Yet eve online's beta wasnt like any other pc's betas either for an mmo. There was only 2 factions and like 90 star sytems. Hell there was a ship in it that like never made it in that I acutally liked (it looked like a sunfish) Heck Null sec didnt exit, tutorials didnt exist (well after launch) lots and lots of things in eve didnt exist back then, like battleships. The thing is the beta from eve looks a hell lot like dust 514s in terms of progress, how things work, how updates are made, how feedback is treated and how the much of the game shaped by the testers.
Off topic, but was wondering if you happened to be a Stargate fan or a fan of another Sci-fi series? Loved the Alteran ships.
Edit:
Iron Wolf Saber, Sadly as I have reported I have never been able to afford the luxury funds, to play EVE Online. Though I know someone who does personally, and I have always been a fan of Gallente (I love the Talos Fast Attack Ship.) Still thank you, for the info. |
Rorek IronBlood
ZionTCD Legacy Rising
746
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 20:47:00 -
[6] - Quote
Battlestar: Gallactica was too much of a soap to me, but then again at times so was Star Trek at times. I enjoyed though a number of the series you listed. Not all of them due to either not having gotten to them, or another reason. Ha-ha. Still I agree with you on terms of CCP and Dust514. They should be able to pound out most issues before launch.
Well here is to hope I suppose.
Things do need patching, and tweeking. However we'll just have to see what CCP has done first come this upcoming thursday? Atleast I would hope soon for the next build. I have no honest official date. Could certainly hope for thursday though? Ha-ha. |
Rorek IronBlood
ZionTCD Legacy Rising
746
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 20:52:00 -
[7] - Quote
Abron Garr wrote:Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Rorek IronBlood wrote:
Off topic, but was wondering if you happened to be a Stargate fan or a fan of another Sci-fi series? Loved the Alteran ships.
Enjoyed the following: Bablyon 5 first few seasons, Battlestar Galactia - TNS but season 3 was boring, Star Trek Next Gen, Voyager, Enterprise. Robotech/Macross, Macross +, Macross 2, Macross Zero, Macross Frontier, Adromeda, Martian Successor Nedesco, Slowly getting into Starblazers but its really dated and hard to appreciate. Bookwise only appreciated Honor Harrigton Series lately. On that note Star Trek is a love/hate relationship : I applaud thier social interactions a bit, I boo thier military (or lack therfore of) mindedness. I got hopes for dust, I just fear not everyone has the paitence to deal with ccp's pacing at times and thier odd knack for pushing back features to make room another feature made it in right. I do see ccp focusing on at least getting the following down by launch as its thier crieteria Hammering out gun play Hammering out controls Hammering out phsyics Getting Factional Wafare Functional Getting Social and Corproate Functional From there they have a bare bones launch game and from there they can keep adding stuff in. That's why DS9 was my favorite. Sisko wasn't afraid to get dirty to save the Federation.
A lot of fans of Star Trek dislikes how gritty, and dark Star Trek: Deep Space Nine was, but I loved it! Netflix allowed me to finally watch all episodes start to finish, and it was even better. Also (The) Sisco, disliked Picard greatly. More so then anything for what he did as a borg (Lacutest of Borg). Still after going back and watching every series I enjoyed it the most next to Star Trek: The Original Series. The military aspect of Star Trek was also best in those two series. I loved the stories though, and as pointed out before the character dialogue and progression. |
Rorek IronBlood
ZionTCD Legacy Rising
746
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 22:02:00 -
[8] - Quote
Mobius Wyvern wrote:How far off topic can this thread go? We are placing bets. 1 million ISK says this thread is locked for off-topic by 1200 GMT tomorrow.
I'll admit I was off topic for a number of posts. I somewhat apologise for it, but really the conversation was much better anyway then what this thread was trying to do -- stir and rile and vex the people. Even if the original poster's intentions were genuine and meant for a better they nonetheless came off as someone just offering nothing more then insults towards the game, and the developers. I saw very little constructive criticism in way of conversation towards the topic at hand.
We all understand the game is far from complete, or perfect. The divide however is in how people seem to act. We're not fanboys, or blind to the problems. Some of us are just more patient, and understanding. Willing to wait and see as we fulfill our duty as [beta] testers as best we can. By being civil and calmly voicing our concerns and opinions in a rational manner. This thread was anything, but that. However it only got worse from there on both sides. Especially in terms of name calling, judging, and throwing accusations at one another.
Calling someone a fanboy is childish. The problem there is that I believe both sides want to better the game just going about in two very different ways. One side is about being as loud and obnoxious as possible while being unable to wait, and then you have us who come off (maybe) as if we are blind to the situation, but we're not. we do say what we want, and what we feel is wrong. We're just more calm about it. This however does account for everyone on either side. Some people are trying troll the forums as best to their ability, and do not care for the game's well being, and some are blind to the problem. Not because, they are a fanboy or anything, but more likely because, they may feel it's not so bad or not worth noting at the very least.
Anyway.... Sorr for babling somewhat, but I just figured I'd throw some input out there on the matter of communication problems. Though as I stated in the past it would help to see some proper documentation from GM, or the DEV's. Even just enough to lessen the tension on here. |
Rorek IronBlood
ZionTCD Legacy Rising
746
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 22:51:00 -
[9] - Quote
Abron Garr wrote:Rorek IronBlood wrote:Mobius Wyvern wrote:How far off topic can this thread go? We are placing bets. 1 million ISK says this thread is locked for off-topic by 1200 GMT tomorrow. I'll admit I was off topic for a number of posts. I somewhat apologise for it, but really the conversation was much better anyway then what this thread was trying to do -- stir and rile and vex the people. Even if the original poster's intentions were genuine and meant for a better they nonetheless came off as someone just offering nothing more then insults towards the game, and the developers. I saw very little constructive criticism in way of conversation towards the topic at hand. We all understand the game is far from complete, or perfect. The divide however is in how people seem to act. We're not fanboys, or blind to the problems. Some of us are just more patient, and understanding. Willing to wait and see as we fulfill our duty as [beta] testers as best we can. By being civil and calmly voicing our concerns and opinions in a rational manner. This thread was anything, but that. However it only got worse from there on both sides. Especially in terms of name calling, judging, and throwing accusations at one another. Calling someone a fanboy is childish. The problem there is that I believe both sides want to better the game just going about in two very different ways. One side is about being as loud and obnoxious as possible while being unable to wait, and then you have us who come off (maybe) as if we are blind to the situation, but we're not. we do say what we want, and what we feel is wrong. We're just more calm about it. This however does account for everyone on either side. Some people are trying troll the forums as best to their ability, and do not care for the game's well being, and some are blind to the problem. Not because, they are a fanboy or anything, but more likely because, they may feel it's not so bad or not worth noting at the very least. Anyway.... Sorr for babling somewhat, but I just figured I'd throw some input out there on the matter of communication problems. Though as I stated in the past it would help to see some proper documentation from GM, or the DEV's. Even just enough to lessen the tension on here. Don't apologize to these assholes. This thread's OP was about as far from constructive as it could possibly be. It might as well be full of Fantasy Football picks from 3 seasons ago.
I really was not so much apologising other then being slightly off topic when I started talking about Sci-fi, and whatnot. Just trying to offer an opinon on why the community is divided as such. I cannot and do not speak for all though as I pointed out. There will always be variables outside the norm, or known that are harder to pin down. I did mention the original posting being a bit harsh though, and offering very little constructiveness to the game.
It's okay though. I mean people have an opinion. I know at times I fly off the handle myself, make stupid comments, or attack back when prevoked. I'm human just as much as everyone else here. I know people that include myself we just get to a point where you cannot take the same sort of posting or thread anymore. They get tired of being reminded it's a [beta], and some of us get tired of the negativity. It happens. I'm guilty of going off a couple of times on such matters. |
|
|
|