DUST Search - JLAV's needs to go

All Channels

General Discussions

JLAV's needs to go

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 11 12 13 :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Godin Thekiller OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention 1764	Posted - 2014.02.24 20:50:00 - [181] - Quote Chuckles Brown wrote: All the scrub tankers came on to this thread it seems. The ones that couldn't survive in 1.6 because they lacked actual... S.K.I.L.L. Maybe, who knows why they want to troll and insult me. 'lights cigar' fuck with me, and I'll melt your face off. Gallente forever! Blup Blub Bloop. Translation: Die -_-
Godin Thekiller OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention 1764	Posted - 2014.02.24 20:53:00 - [182] - Quote Viktor Skirov wrote: Godin Thekiller wrote: Viktor Skirov wrote: Godin Thekiller wrote: Viktor Skirov wrote: Godin, I respect you, but I disagree with the removal of JLAVS, at least for now. Yes, i've done it, but you know?, i've only succeeded only 3 times of 17 i've tryed (I aim at MLT tanks only), and always or I'm at bad terrain, or I don't get enough speed, or I just simply hit them, but there's no BOOM, due to the impact not registering, and it's not just simply "Go ram ram!" it's or sacrificing a vehicle to distract the user, or sacrifice infantry. It's a cheap tactic, usually a "Crutchling" one, and as I said, I only use it when there are MLT tanks (Test subjects... Ya know...) And also, how is that you can't kill a driver with a large blaster, possibly a Ion Cannon, I don't know what fit you use, if I can kill drivers using a turret that has some hit detection issues (Screw tanks, i'll stay with my Methana with ADV railgun). Tell me what happens, because i've been exterminated by blasters several times on my LAV, WHILE USING NITRO. And all those, using a sentinel suit with 600 S and 894 A (Approximately, can't remenber correctly) It's probably hit detection, and you're just unlucky. Haven't shot anyone out the pilot's seat of a LAV since 1.6.. Weirdly, I've shot one out of the passenger's seat. Well, still not agree with you, but I'm not going to come with wah wah wah, I like that jihading, and actually the counters to tanks are a pain on the nut for someone who plays solo 24/7 (Im terribad at finding trustworthy people, plus voice server doesn't work for me), but yeah, being on a Jihhad needs to have someone thinking their route, and there are many places on the terrain that will negate your suicide attempt, and let the tanker know what's up, and personally I find pretty hard not be blown up (At least on the times i've tried jihhading) by infantry or impacting a wall due to a bounce. And well... Yeah... Let's say that my luck is good as the one of a cow on the slaughterhouse. planning? rough terrain ? If you are having these problems, you're doing it wrong. Out of the 25 times I tried this, I hit and killed the target every single time (normal testing anyways; I did 30 tests, but those 5 left over, the Re's failed to go off). Yes, planing, or its me the only one who stays on a hiding place for a moment until I see a window of opportunity and move directly to the route the tanker goes, wait for him, and then try to go at full speed. And yes, rough terrain, have you ever tried to catch a tank that is on irregular terrain?, like the areas outside the objective?. Sometimes the argument of the terrain cannot be applied, like for example on the map with the three objectives hmm... The one who kinda looks like a refinery and has thr towers where snipers and forge gunners tend to place themselves. Well, in that map there are few rough areas, but still, there are times that even if its a clean ways, the LAV tends to bounceand lose speed, and resulting on a impact not damaging enought to trigger the REs and put the tank to sleep, and LAVs are not unkillable jeeps exactly. That is, or I'm the most unfortunate Dust 514 player that exist. 1: That's just stalking the HAV down. Guess you have a different name for it to be all fancy lol. 2: no, I never have. And I tested this on all the maps. Maybe I'm so used to driving on the ****** terrain that it doesn't effect my skills........... 'lights cigar' fuck with me, and I'll melt your face off. Gallente forever! Blup Blub Bloop. Translation: Die -_-
Godin Thekiller OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention 1764	Posted - 2014.02.24 20:55:00 - [183] - Quote TheD1CK wrote: Godin Thekiller wrote: TheD1CK wrote: Godin, try not sitting still in your HAV, camping Run with a competent squad to warn of LAV location And stay on un-even terrain it stops them gaining speed You do realize the only HAV's bad enough to suffer from JLAVS are the guys to focused on camping a point rather than their survival.. Jihad jeeps have a really low sucess rate, unless the HAV driver deserves it I constantly move around and go place to place to help out my squads. And yes, they do tell me if they see a JlAV coming at me. like that'll stop one from ramming into me and killing me. yes, I shot at one moving away from it, couldn't kill it (this was straight firing for several seconds with a neutron blaster), yet it still rammed me. This has happened 6 times to me. twice in one game. What was that? The highlight of that guys evening on Dust It's not that hard to avoid, hopefully you will learn from mistakes It happened to me while I was testing how OP JLAV's were as well (when the one time the HAV actually saw me coming), and it looked as if it was hitting me square in the face, yetr no damage was delt. 'lights cigar' fuck with me, and I'll melt your face off. Gallente forever! Blup Blub Bloop. Translation: Die -_-
Godin Thekiller OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention 1764	Posted - 2014.02.24 20:56:00 - [184] - Quote Monkey MAC wrote: Tanks are balanced you need to find news ways to destroy us. Creates LAV bomb Thats not fair, I can't be expected to counter someone who has launched a large payload at my weakspot. You should be using tanks Uses Mlt Tanks with rails Thats not fair, rails overpowered because they blow me up, mlt tanks are solely responsible for tank spam, you should be using std tanks with blasters You told us to adapt we did, don't expect CCP to fix your overpowered ** anymore. They made RE sticky, therefore its fair game. If you don't like it, leave. HTFU adapt with AV, not find more broken stuff to use. And now you're trying to defend your OP/broken **. Cute. 'lights cigar' fuck with me, and I'll melt your face off. Gallente forever! Blup Blub Bloop. Translation: Die -_-
Godin Thekiller OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention 1765	Posted - 2014.02.24 21:00:00 - [185] - Quote Justicar Karnellia wrote: Sorry, there's no credibility here. The fact that jihad jeeps even exist is fuelled by the near incapacity of "traditional" AV to counter what they are supposed to counter - vehicles. This is one a multitude of threads with the same core issue, but if you've ever driven a LAV or even a tank, you'll know that their counter is touch and go, plus the fact that they are suiciding to kill you... you hit the slightest terrain deformation in your LAV and you go flipping end over end and are just target practice after that... I think what is working is that they are destroying HAV's... they do it well, and cheaply enough to make it viable. Once infantry AV is balanced again, you will see people gravitate away from JLAVs naturally. No you ******* won't, and if I field a 500k HAV, a damn well expect it to survive a hit from a LAV going ~67 MPH (I expect the LAV to survive a crash that slow) trying to ram me, and it only costing 50k. only way people will use AV over that if it becomes as bad or worse than before, and we are no going back to that. HAV's and several modules, as well as the turrets needs fixing. 'lights cigar' fuck with me, and I'll melt your face off. Gallente forever! Blup Blub Bloop. Translation: Die -_-
ER-Bullitt Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance 1104	Posted - 2014.02.24 21:21:00 - [186] - Quote I will make this easy for you. Before 1.7 dropped.. How many JLAV's did you see? How many JLAV QQ posts did you read on these forums? The answer is zero. The solution to your problem lies in this question "what changed in 1.7?" Vehicle > AV ... imbalance. Now think about your complaint. I doubt you are looking for sympathy from the rest of the posters here who are basically laughing at you. But you are literally crying about players who are so frustrated, so fed up, and so hopelessly outmatched by these ******* tanks that they willingly commit suicide to take you off the field for a minute. Think about that for a second, let it marinate. Now think about what you are campaigning for... use your energy to push for the right path. The rebalancing of AV versus Vehicle... and what will follow will be players no longer needing to resort to JLAV's to deal with OP tanks. You're welcome.
Omareth Nasadra The New Age Outlaws WINMATAR. 309	Posted - 2014.02.24 21:23:00 - [187] - Quote ER-Bullitt wrote: I will make this easy for you. Before 1.7 dropped.. How many JLAV's did you see? How many JLAV QQ posts did you read on these forums? The answer is zero. The solution to your problem lies in this question "what changed in 1.7?" Vehicle > AV ... imbalance. Now think about your complaint. I doubt you are looking for sympathy from the rest of the posters here who are basically laughing at you. But you are literally crying about players who are so frustrated, so fed up, and so hopelessly outmatched by these ******* tanks that they willingly commit suicide to take you off the field for a minute. Think about that for a second, let it marinate. Now think about what you are campaigning for... use your energy to push for the right path. The rebalancing of AV versus Vehicle... and what will follow will be players no longer needing to resort to JLAV's to deal with OP tanks. You're welcome. ^ this, nuff said Minmatar, In rust we trust!!! Omareth Nasadra/Erynyes
Crimson ShieId Psygod9 D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E 106	Posted - 2014.02.24 21:26:00 - [188] - Quote ER-Bullitt wrote: I will make this easy for you. Before 1.7 dropped.. How many JLAV's did you see? How many JLAV QQ posts did you read on these forums? The answer is zero. The solution to your problem lies in this question "what changed in 1.7?" Vehicle > AV ... imbalance. Now think about your complaint. I doubt you are looking for sympathy from the rest of the posters here who are basically laughing at you. But you are literally crying about players who are so frustrated, so fed up, and so hopelessly outmatched by these ******* tanks that they willingly commit suicide to take you off the field for a minute. Think about that for a second, let it marinate. Now think about what you are campaigning for... use your energy to push for the right path. The rebalancing of AV versus Vehicle... and what will follow will be players no longer needing to resort to JLAV's to deal with OP tanks. You're welcome. I like it, but there's only one problem... RE's weren't sticky before, so it wasn't physically possible to use a Jihad Lav. Probably would have seen quite a few if they were sticky, seeing as how such is an effective tactic in games like Battlefield. Sometimes I miss never seeing tanks in a battle... then I remember the mystical flying soma, and I can't help but smile.
Godin Thekiller OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention 1766	Posted - 2014.02.24 21:26:00 - [189] - Quote ER-Bullitt wrote: I will make this easy for you. Before 1.7 dropped.. How many JLAV's did you see? How many JLAV QQ posts did you read on these forums? The answer is zero. The solution to your problem lies in this question "what changed in 1.7?" Vehicle > AV ... imbalance. Now think about your complaint. I doubt you are looking for sympathy from the rest of the posters here who are basically laughing at you. But you are literally crying about players who are so frustrated, so fed up, and so hopelessly outmatched by these ***** tanks that they willingly commit suicide to take you off the field for a minute. Think about that for a second, let it marinate. Now think about what you are campaigning for... use your energy to push for the right path. The rebalancing of AV versus Vehicle... and what will follow will be players no longer needing to resort to JLAV's to deal with OP tanks. You're welcome. 1: None, because it was impossible;e 2: None, because it was impossible;e Yes, I realize that (even though I've given ways to easily take out HAV's with AV several times) that people for some reason or another can't take out the HAV's in their state. Yes, I've said that their broken and needs fixing. But you can't just let something broken stay like that. Also, I have, I I stated several other times already in this thread. maybe I should make that my sig, as people are quick to say that I only want unstoppable HAV's. Or maybe you sipshits just want to ***. Also, you really think I care for insults from idiots? LOL 'lights cigar' fuck with me, and I'll melt your face off. Gallente forever! Blup Blub Bloop. Translation: Die -_-
Godin Thekiller OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention 1766	Posted - 2014.02.24 21:27:00 - [190] - Quote Crimson ShieId wrote: ER-Bullitt wrote: I will make this easy for you. Before 1.7 dropped.. How many JLAV's did you see? How many JLAV QQ posts did you read on these forums? The answer is zero. The solution to your problem lies in this question "what changed in 1.7?" Vehicle > AV ... imbalance. Now think about your complaint. I doubt you are looking for sympathy from the rest of the posters here who are basically laughing at you. But you are literally crying about players who are so frustrated, so fed up, and so hopelessly outmatched by these ******* tanks that they willingly commit suicide to take you off the field for a minute. Think about that for a second, let it marinate. Now think about what you are campaigning for... use your energy to push for the right path. The rebalancing of AV versus Vehicle... and what will follow will be players no longer needing to resort to JLAV's to deal with OP tanks. You're welcome. I like it, but there's only one problem... RE's weren't sticky before, so it wasn't physically possible to use a Jihad Lav. Probably would have seen quite a few if they were sticky, seeing as how such is an effective tactic in games like Battlefield. Ah, someone else with a half logic. 'lights cigar' fuck with me, and I'll melt your face off. Gallente forever! Blup Blub Bloop. Translation: Die -_-

Crimson ShieId Psygod9 D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E 107	Posted - 2014.02.24 21:29:00 - [191] - Quote Hey! I have at least 2/3 logic! Sometimes I miss never seeing tanks in a battle... then I remember the mystical flying soma, and I can't help but smile.
ER-Bullitt Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance 1106	Posted - 2014.02.24 21:29:00 - [192] - Quote Silence!! you ruining the point I was trying to make with your logic. ________ I logged 1300 hours playing battlefield 3 Rest assured, jihad jeeping was not a tactic. It was solely used for trolling and lols. The reason I can say this with 100% certainty? Infantry and Vehicles were properly balanced in that game. It took a lot of time and effort on the devs part, rock/paper/scissor actually existed and worked in BF3 (well except maybe for a solid jet pilot, but we don't have to worry about those yet lol)
Zahle Undt Bullet Cluster Legacy Rising 751	Posted - 2014.02.24 21:31:00 - [193] - Quote Message to Godin: When tanks are brought into balance and/or infantry without heavy suits have some sort of effective Av option (I.E. swarms get fixed and buffed) then I will agree. Until then RE laden jeeps and militia tanks are all we have to thwart complete tank domination. And militia tanks are not even much an answer against skilled tankers (SP invested and much better at driving them than tank scrubs such as myself) Most tankers are like sand people. They frighten easily, but will quickly return...and in greater numbers.
ER-Bullitt Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance 1106	Posted - 2014.02.24 21:31:00 - [194] - Quote Godin.. The point is if AV were actually balanced with Vehicles nobody would be commiting suicide on purpose to deal with your annoying tank crutch. Except for a few trolls looking for lols. Just ask for this thread to be deleted would you? P.S. jihad jeeping will only get worse the longer CCP fails to balance tanks.. so you better take the advice given by the community and learn to play (theres an insult for you crybaby lol)
Crimson ShieId Psygod9 D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E 107	Posted - 2014.02.24 21:31:00 - [195] - Quote ER-Bullitt wrote: Silence!! you ruining the point I was trying to make with your logic. ________ I logged 1300 hours playing battlefield 3 Rest assured, jihad jeeping was not a tactic. It was solely used for trolling and lols. The reason I can say this with 100% certainty? Infantry and Vehicles were properly balanced in that game. It took a lot of time and effort on the devs part, rock/paper/scissor actually existed and worked in BF3 (well except maybe for a solid jet pilot, but we don't have to worry about those yet lol) ... D-did... did you unlock the bipod for your knife? And hey, I'll have you know I had a lot of fun blowing up tankers with that and... okay, so maybe it was more so for trolling, but it was still fun... though I suppose parachuting out of a jet and landing on top of a tank while dropping C4 was more fun... Sometimes I miss never seeing tanks in a battle... then I remember the mystical flying soma, and I can't help but smile.
Godin Thekiller OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention 1767	Posted - 2014.02.24 21:33:00 - [196] - Quote Crimson ShieId wrote: Hey! I have at least 2/3 logic! Fine, you gotz 2/3 lol. 'lights cigar' fuck with me, and I'll melt your face off. Gallente forever! Blup Blub Bloop. Translation: Die -_-
Godin Thekiller OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention 1767	Posted - 2014.02.24 21:35:00 - [197] - Quote Zahle Undt wrote: Message to Godin: When tanks are brought into balance and/or infantry without heavy suits have some sort of effective Av option (I.E. swarms get fixed and buffed) then I will agree. Until then RE laden jeeps and militia tanks are all we have to thwart complete tank domination. And militia tanks are not even much an answer against skilled tankers (SP invested and much better at driving them than tank scrubs such as myself) No ****; it would be done all at the same time. I'm saying it needs to happen soon. 'lights cigar' fuck with me, and I'll melt your face off. Gallente forever! Blup Blub Bloop. Translation: Die -_-
Godin Thekiller OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention 1767	Posted - 2014.02.24 21:36:00 - [198] - Quote ER-Bullitt wrote: Godin.. The point is if AV were actually balanced with Vehicles nobody would be commiting suicide on purpose to deal with your annoying tank crutch. Except for a few trolls looking for lols. Just ask for this thread to be deleted would you? P.S. jihad jeeping will only get worse the longer CCP fails to balance tanks.. so you better take the advice given by the community and learn to play (theres an insult for you crybaby lol) Your argument is childish and trolly. I don't argue with children. Try again. 'lights cigar' fuck with me, and I'll melt your face off. Gallente forever! Blup Blub Bloop. Translation: Die -_-
Godin Thekiller OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention 1767	Posted - 2014.02.24 21:37:00 - [199] - Quote ER-Bullitt wrote: Silence!! you ruining the point I was trying to make with your logic. ________ I logged 1300 hours playing battlefield 3 Rest assured, jihad jeeping was not a tactic. It was solely used for trolling and lols. The reason I can say this with 100% certainty? Infantry and Vehicles were properly balanced in that game. It took a lot of time and effort on the devs part, rock/paper/scissor actually existed and worked in BF3 (well except maybe for a solid jet pilot, but we don't have to worry about those yet lol) So you're saying that a game in which things do matter should be balanced like ones that don't? Logic is absent. 'lights cigar' fuck with me, and I'll melt your face off. Gallente forever! Blup Blub Bloop. Translation: Die -_-
Crimson ShieId Psygod9 D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E 108	Posted - 2014.02.24 21:50:00 - [200] - Quote Godin Thekiller wrote: ER-Bullitt wrote: Silence!! you ruining the point I was trying to make with your logic. ________ I logged 1300 hours playing battlefield 3 Rest assured, jihad jeeping was not a tactic. It was solely used for trolling and lols. The reason I can say this with 100% certainty? Infantry and Vehicles were properly balanced in that game. It took a lot of time and effort on the devs part, rock/paper/scissor actually existed and worked in BF3 (well except maybe for a solid jet pilot, but we don't have to worry about those yet lol) So you're saying that a game in which things do matter should be balanced like ones that don't? Logic is absent. But... things don't matter. At least not yet. There's no real interaction between Dust and Eve yet, winning or losing a battle doesn't make a big difference, there's not even an ISK payout difference for winning. Heck, you at least got a little bit extra in Battlefield for winning... well, I suppose PC and FW matter, but not to the point that we'd like them to. Sometimes I miss never seeing tanks in a battle... then I remember the mystical flying soma, and I can't help but smile.

Godin Thekiller OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention 1767	Posted - 2014.02.24 21:53:00 - [201] - Quote Crimson ShieId wrote: Godin Thekiller wrote: ER-Bullitt wrote: Silence!! you ruining the point I was trying to make with your logic. ________ I logged 1300 hours playing battlefield 3 Rest assured, jihad jeeping was not a tactic. It was solely used for trolling and lols. The reason I can say this with 100% certainty? Infantry and Vehicles were properly balanced in that game. It took a lot of time and effort on the devs part, rock/paper/scissor actually existed and worked in BF3 (well except maybe for a solid jet pilot, but we don't have to worry about those yet lol) So you're saying that a game in which things do matter should be balanced like ones that don't? Logic is absent. But... things don't matter. At least not yet. There's no real interaction between Dust and Eve yet, winning or losing a battle doesn't make a big difference, there's not even an ISK payout difference for winning. Heck, you at least got a little bit extra in Battlefield for winning... well, I suppose PC and FW matter, but not to the point that we'd like them to. ISK matters, and it always will (even if tQ shouts down, as it's Icelands name for its currency too lol). and FW and PC will matter SOONtm. There will be many other things that matters, but most of all, ISK matters. So yes, things in Dust do in fact matter. try again. 'lights cigar' fuck with me, and I'll melt your face off. Gallente forever! Blup Blub Bloop. Translation: Die -_-
ER-Bullitt Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance 1107	Posted - 2014.02.24 21:59:00 - [202] - Quote Haha godin, classic response. "Your logic is too sound.. you must be a child" I'm sorry if I tried to let you down softly and didn't LOL at your post the moment I read it (even though it is extremely lolworthy) I thought you might be open to reason and understanding that removing jihad jeeps should be the ******* LAST thing on CCPs list of "to-dos" But I digress, you are a tanker afterall and that says a lot.
Marc Rime 285	Posted - 2014.02.24 22:02:00 - [203] - Quote I think the "problem" of RE+LAV will automatically resolve itself when the real AV becomes viable again.
Crimson ShieId Psygod9 D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E 108	Posted - 2014.02.24 22:03:00 - [204] - Quote Godin Thekiller wrote: Crimson ShieId wrote: Godin Thekiller wrote: ER-Bullitt wrote: Silence!! you ruining the point I was trying to make with your logic. ________ I logged 1300 hours playing battlefield 3 Rest assured, jihad jeeping was not a tactic. It was solely used for trolling and lols. The reason I can say this with 100% certainty? Infantry and Vehicles were properly balanced in that game. It took a lot of time and effort on the devs part, rock/paper/scissor actually existed and worked in BF3 (well except maybe for a solid jet pilot, but we don't have to worry about those yet lol) So you're saying that a game in which things do matter should be balanced like ones that don't? Logic is absent. But... things don't matter. At least not yet. There's no real interaction between Dust and Eve yet, winning or losing a battle doesn't make a big difference, there's not even an ISK payout difference for winning. Heck, you at least got a little bit extra in Battlefield for winning... well, I suppose PC and FW matter, but not to the point that we'd like them to. ISK matters, and it always will (even if tQ shouts down, as it's Icelands name for its currency too lol). and FW and PC will matter SOONtm. There will be many other things that matters, but most of all, ISK matters. So yes, things in Dust do in fact matter. try again. But it doesn't. Unless you're determined to always run proto suits. If we weren't able to use cheaper fits, it might. If we weren't able to use blueprints, it might. It can't matter as is, because the player market doesn't exist. There's no rise and fall in stocks. You play a game, you get Isk. It doesn't matter if you win or lose, you get it. You can do nothing at all aside from equipment spam the entire game and get Isk. You can redline snipe and get Isk. Heck, Isk is more dependent on what the other team is using than what YOU do. If things eventually get fixed with PC and we get a player market, perhaps Isk will matter, but it doesn't right now. A player can do well with a militia, basic, or advanced suit, just the same as they can with proto gear, especially if they're in a competent squad. The same thing can be said of tanks. I can buy three or four militia tanks right now and do very well for that meager investment and even manage to make it all back in one game. And no, I don't have 200 million Isk, so I'm not saying all this just because I've got plenty to spend. P.S. Biomassing clones. I rest my case. Sometimes I miss never seeing tanks in a battle... then I remember the mystical flying soma, and I can't help but smile.
ER-Bullitt Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance 1107	Posted - 2014.02.24 22:06:00 - [205] - Quote Godin, Did you really just say that Dust 514 shouldn't take que's from Battlefields infantry versus av balance, or balance overall, because of the ******* in game currency system? You are correct, logic is absent here you dolt.
Shyeer Alvarin Dead Six Initiative Lokun Listamenn 190	Posted - 2014.02.24 22:17:00 - [206] - Quote Two words for the OP: Emergent Gameplay. So yer tellin' me... that if there's a tanker on the field that just lols at AV that I should just suck it up and let him stay on his steel horse when I have a counter? Not just no. HAYLE naw. Closed Beta Veteran Founding CEO of Dead Six Initiative/Lokun Listamenn Lokun i Gangi, Mercenaries. Recruitment is OPEN
Monkey MAC Rough Riders.. 2050	Posted - 2014.02.24 22:20:00 - [207] - Quote Godin Thekiller wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: Tanks are balanced you need to find news ways to destroy us. Creates LAV bomb Thats not fair, I can't be expected to counter someone who has launched a large payload at my weakspot. You should be using tanks Uses Mlt Tanks with rails Thats not fair, rails overpowered because they blow me up, mlt tanks are solely responsible for tank spam, you should be using std tanks with blasters You told us to adapt we did, don't expect CCP to fix your overpowered ** anymore. They made RE sticky, therefore its fair game. If you don't like it, leave. HTFU adapt with AV, not find more broken stuff to use. And now you're trying to defend your OP/broken **. Cute. Broken? How is using a mechanic that is available to us with perfectly legitimate gear broken? Broken would be glitching the swarm launcher to have 0 fire delay Also question for you, I have 2 choices 1 that requires effort, planning, teamwork and over 30% of my task force, or I have one that requires 1 guy with effort and planning, which is the smart option. How are rail tanks broken? Or is it just because the mechanics tankers wanted are now working against them? I suppose your gonna tell me Remote Explosives are overpowered next, then you'll tell me that an ADS does too much damage to vehicles, then you'll tell me that we shouldn't ever introduce bombers incase we those bombs can blow up tanks. Combat Engineer in training. Monkey Mac - Forum Warrior of the Trees Lvl 2.
Venerable Phage Red Shirts Away Team 59	Posted - 2014.02.24 22:31:00 - [208] - Quote Marc Rime wrote: I think the "problem" of RE+LAV will automatically resolve itself when the real AV becomes viable again. I think this nails it on the head. When legitimate AV is back on the field JLAVs will only be around for the LOLs. I think the tankers need to use teamwork and show how swarms can stop JLAVs. It would require a bit of combined arms team playing. But I'm sure a tank teaming with a LAV and a couple of swarms would counter JLAVs and provide extra firepower vs other vehicles.
Godin Thekiller OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention 1767	Posted - 2014.02.24 22:32:00 - [209] - Quote You know what? There's no hope for you damn idiots. 'lights cigar' fuck with me, and I'll melt your face off. Gallente forever! Blup Blub Bloop. Translation: Die -_-
Monkey MAC Rough Riders.. 2051	Posted - 2014.02.24 22:35:00 - [210] - Quote Godin Thekiller wrote: You know what? There's no hope for you damn idiots. says the guy who can't shoot a car with a rifle. Combat Engineer in training. Monkey Mac - Forum Warrior of the Trees Lvl 2.



Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 11 12 13 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page