Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 12 post(s) |
Vinsarrow
New Eden Blades Of The Azure
71
|
Posted - 2013.11.10 20:27:00 -
[151] - Quote
Here's some more if you all aren't displeased enough already
#16Posted: 2013.11.10 18:50 | Edited by: Jihad Destroyer 011011
TigerXtrm wrote:
stoicfaux wrote: Interesting reads.
https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=1473172#post1473172
CCPNullarbor wrote: The shares and voting system is complicated and we purposefully did not include any of this in DUST. However once you have a mixed corporation you need to understand the implications of having both games involved.
On one hand we have the "spirit of EVE". On the other we have DUST. Is it really a good idea to hotdrop the Dusties (aka a FPS console game) with full blown EVE mechanics (i.e. villainy) and excessive complexity? I can see arguments for both sides; integrating with EVE means working in a cold dark untrusting universe, however, it's a damn FPS console game with a different audience, different attention span, limited user interface, etc..
Does CCP want DUST to be as cold and harsh as EVE (i.e. have the same audience, potentially a small niche) or do they want to expand their audience with DUST? If it's the latter, then CCP will need to make DUST less vulnerable (or more buffered/firewalled) to the harshness of EVE.
This pretty much.
Different audience requires a different approach. The average F2P FPS player isn't going to expect, let alone be part of, the EVE meta game of espionage etc. If you start allowing that stuff it's a powder keg of bad publicity waiting to happen for Dust. The 'simple' FPS players who just want to shoot stuff for half an hour will start complaining about how Dust is an unfair game how they got scammed out of their corp. Perfectly legit as it may be, a casual FPS gamer will never ever understand it.
So no, bad idea. Dust is NOT EVE. Dust is connected to EVE and nothing more. I clearly see CCP's reasoning in protecting Dust corps on this matter.
Edit: Oh and...
Quote: GMs jumping in the way they did shows favoritism for DUST514 members which paying EVE players NEVER get.
When did all this 'all should be equal and fair' crap become a theme? It's starting to get annoying.
if they want to just play then there are many other FPS out there. There is a reason EVE is not a larger player base- it is harsh and cold place. DUST514 getting different treatment is ripe for a different kind of exploit later where DUST514 members are able to meta game but are put in a protected status.
The point of my post is GIVE leaders in both corps equal footing for shares and roles selections to manage their teams. DUST corp leaders have already robbed each other before and it was allowed. This is just a different flavor of the same thing. |
AccursedZero
New Eden Blades Of The Azure
2
|
Posted - 2013.11.10 20:48:00 -
[152] - Quote
Bump, Might as well while on my secondary character checking it. lol |
RAider Vherikor
DUST CORE
7
|
Posted - 2013.11.10 21:15:00 -
[153] - Quote
Zero Notion wrote:I'm so baffled by the DEV response to this - it borders on an asinine scolding with a smirking, "It's the New Eden Meta Game!" but it's not like Dust is a F2P game advertised on the PS3 network which is a console, not a PC, where a great deal of players are not going to be from Eve or even know very little of Eve or know why they should potentially know about Eve (because of something like this). This is seriously a critical oversight and what is even more shocking is the, "This is your fault because you want to have access to content that you should already have!"
I don't really understand why alliances are not in the game; if it took Eve two years to develop and yet CCP has ALL that time to recognize how important alliances are and how much player-driver content opportunities alliances offer (which is so, so badly needed right now in Dust), why wasn't it one of the first mechanics available? Even in a FPS player crave some level of sociability, yeesh.
I agree, there needs to be a better tutorial explaining to the PS3 gamer how they impact the universe of New Eden, and more about EVE side as well. EVE players likewise would benefit from understanding how DUST impacts them as well.
To be honest most EVE players have no idea what their risks are in EVE either. For the most part it is a "leaders beware" mentality, so if they missed learning how to run a corp they get a big "tough" from CCP when they lose it.
DUST Corps should be no different, and they have the same tools as long as they have an EVE capsuleer working with them. |
RAider Vherikor
DUST CORE
8
|
Posted - 2013.11.10 21:27:00 -
[154] - Quote
NanoCleric wrote:Just a quick update all...
I logged on tonight to check if Vala had the corp back and she hasn't.
I have no idea what CCP did to help, but it's not succeeded. When Vala logged on today at the end of the vote timer with the hope she could have her CEO powers unblocked due to the vote ending.. she found that Jihad had control of the corp, which resulted in him kicking the players who have been supporting her.
Now Jihad has transferred CEO to RAider Vherikor and Vala has no control over the corp anymore.
By his own admission on the EVE forums, Jihad has posted announcing the exploit he found and used against DUST CORE, and mentions he has hit multiple corps via this 'bug/exploit' between the games.
CCP This is your own fault for bad coding, and this coming from someone who works in the game industry himself. You have proivided players with no way to defend themselves from espionage in this instance. If they could defend themselves and lost it, then fair enough.. that's the world of New Eden, but due to bad choices, you have given players the ability to ruin someone's hard work without being challenged.
This should be put to rights to undo your mistake, to reinstate control of the corps to their owners. As mentioned.. i would support the espionage if it was fair and Dust CEO's had mechanics to defend themselves. Since there are no mechanics to do such, then you should put these to rights, and put in defenses against it. Any other course of action imho is down to negligence.
So sorry.. despite CCP claiming they have helped, The theft was successful.
I am one of the flag wavers for equal capability for leaders on both platforms.
While I agree there are definitely some room for improvement here, some of what you write is incorrect and I suspect this is because of where the information you are getting is coming from.
This was not a bug or exploit it is normal and well documented and encouraged part of meta game play. The same techniques were used to take down large alliances and corps time and time again. To say it was a special case here would also be wrong.
This corp had many experienced EVE players (including the EVE alt the CEO had but chose not to use to hold the shares which were made before Jihad or I were on the scene). This corp also had several EVE directors in its time, and if anything was a functioning hybrid corp, which recruited in both EVE and DUST514.
To ask for special treatment at this stage would have very grave consequences to the interpretation of the EULA and the future of DUST514-EVE integration. |
Leither Yiltron
KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION
784
|
Posted - 2013.11.11 01:19:00 -
[155] - Quote
Vinsarrow wrote: Not alot of EVE players even know of this & no Dust 514 players know of it (till now) as we weren't told & if you haven't heard of shares how can you look into it?
I'm certainly not defending CCP's horrid lack of corporation and alliance management UI in Dust, but this kind of statement is simply incorrect. Most of the large Dust alliances are acutely aware of all the mechanics that underlie corporations, including the Eve mechanics. Your best resource is ALWAYS EVELOPEDIA; for instance:
https://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/Corporation_management_guide
Yes, the UI needs to be integrated into Dust. But frankly you should always, always, ALWAYS read up on any mechanics you plan to interact with. Because CCP are slow to the ball, the underlying Eve mechanics are usually more complex. Check Evelopedia, and don't trust anyone you haven't known for a good long span of time or who is otherwise trustworthy with being CEO of your corporation. If your corp is big enough to need to be in an alliance and you don't have a truly trustworthy player to put in the application, you should be responsible enough to suck it up and pay the $15 necessary to sub an Eve account for a month and do it yourself.
CCP are really money-grubbers in this situation, though. They really just want to force anyone who wants true control of their corporation to pay an Eve sub, which has always been a joke. All of their rhetoric about "simplifying" corps for Dust players is a product of this implicit aim. If they really wanted to simplify the interface in Dust they could put in a "use simplified corp UI" toggle in the menus.
PC Coordinator for RISE of LEGION
Have a pony
|
Vala Prime
DUST CORE
27
|
Posted - 2013.11.11 13:09:00 -
[156] - Quote
here's why this is unfair and an exploit you can go on blah blah blahing trying to defend why you (jihad) and raider are not class a ho bags going on about how we had other eve pilots who is and yada yada yada when nano cleric who has years of eve experience didn't know what happened because as CCP null arbor stated the dust CEO has control over the shares in their corp till an eve pilot is CEO even for a brief period those shares become public and there is no way that any one would know this this doesn't eve happen in eve once someone has control of share they have those share in eve there is no poor programing that is so obscure that just takes already allocated shares away so that the next ho bag can take them and that's why ccp has been intervening |
Vala Prime
DUST CORE
27
|
Posted - 2013.11.11 13:11:00 -
[157] - Quote
Vala Prime wrote:here's why this is unfair and an exploit you can go on blah blah blahing trying to defend why you (jihad) and raider are not class a ho bags going on about how we had other eve pilots who is and yada yada yada when nano cleric who has years of eve experience didn't know what happened because as CCP null arbor stated the dust CEO has control over the shares in their corp till an eve pilot is CEO even for a brief period those shares become public and there is no way that any one would know this this doesn't happen in eve once someone has control of share they have those share in eve there is no poor programing that is so obscure that just takes already allocated shares away so that the next ho bag can take them and that's why ccp has been intervening
|
Aeladon Leiko
KNIGHTZ OF THE ROUND
3
|
Posted - 2013.11.11 13:28:00 -
[158] - Quote
CCP Nullarbor wrote:The only way this happens is if you assign CEO of your corp to an EVE player. Even if they give the CEO title back they could have taken shares during their stay which gives them power to boot the current CEO using voting. It seems this is becoming increasingly common and confusing people so we will add a warning about it when you resign from CEO.
The shares and voting system is complicated and we purposefully did not include any of this in DUST. However once you have a mixed corporation you need to understand the implications of having both games involved.
i hate to say this without testing it now but unless a change has been made in the last 3 months with regards to the way shares function you are 100% wrong. and i know it for a fact. all you need to take shares is be made a director. the director can then assign shares out of the wallet to him self. their is NOTHING dust side that can be done about this. its always worked like this. you need to check this out Null. |
Vala Prime
DUST CORE
27
|
Posted - 2013.11.11 13:40:00 -
[159] - Quote
Aeladon Leiko wrote:CCP Nullarbor wrote:The only way this happens is if you assign CEO of your corp to an EVE player. Even if they give the CEO title back they could have taken shares during their stay which gives them power to boot the current CEO using voting. It seems this is becoming increasingly common and confusing people so we will add a warning about it when you resign from CEO.
The shares and voting system is complicated and we purposefully did not include any of this in DUST. However once you have a mixed corporation you need to understand the implications of having both games involved. i hate to say this without testing it now but unless a change has been made in the last 3 months with regards to the way shares function you are 100% wrong. and i know it for a fact. all you need to take shares is be made a director. the director can then assign shares out of the wallet to him self. their is NOTHING dust side that can be done about this. its always worked like this. you need to check this out Null. and you are also right when an eve corp is made the share are public and can be taken by anyone that is ceo director or an accountant but once those share are allocated they can not be taken away unlees that share holder gives away his shares or all other share holders vote majority to remove those share. how ever in a dust made corp accoring to ccp nullarbor all shares are pre allocated to the ceo so that even a eve director can not touch them (its in his post) unless a eve pilot is made ceo such as to enter an alliance at such time the share are stripe from the dust player and made public for any eve pilot to get with out dust players able to do anything they can not even allocate the shares to someone else prior to switching with a eve pilot to prevent this from happening as well |
Coyle Secundus
Death by Disassociation Zero-Day
3
|
Posted - 2013.11.11 14:31:00 -
[160] - Quote
Vala Prime wrote:Aeladon Leiko wrote:CCP Nullarbor wrote:The only way this happens is if you assign CEO of your corp to an EVE player. Even if they give the CEO title back they could have taken shares during their stay which gives them power to boot the current CEO using voting. It seems this is becoming increasingly common and confusing people so we will add a warning about it when you resign from CEO.
The shares and voting system is complicated and we purposefully did not include any of this in DUST. However once you have a mixed corporation you need to understand the implications of having both games involved. i hate to say this without testing it now but unless a change has been made in the last 3 months with regards to the way shares function you are 100% wrong. and i know it for a fact. all you need to take shares is be made a director. the director can then assign shares out of the wallet to him self. their is NOTHING dust side that can be done about this. its always worked like this. you need to check this out Null. and you are also right when an eve corp is made the share are public and can be taken by anyone that is ceo director or an accountant but once those share are allocated they can not be taken away unlees that share holder gives away his shares or all other share holders vote majority to remove those share. how ever in a dust made corp accoring to ccp nullarbor all shares are pre allocated to the ceo so that even a eve director can not touch them (its in his post) unless a eve pilot is made ceo such as to enter an alliance at such time the share are stripe from the dust player and made public for any eve pilot to get with out dust players able to do anything they can not even allocate the shares to someone else prior to switching with a eve pilot to prevent this from happening as well so in other words is in order to safely join an alliance in dust you have to get a computer pay ccp that monthly fee and make your own pilot the ceo
|
|
RAider Vherikor
DUST CORE
20
|
Posted - 2013.11.11 15:22:00 -
[161] - Quote
Reav Hannari wrote:How can a strictly DUST player understand corporation mechanics that are not present in the DUST client?
I am a fan of reading. That always helps. In a galaxy where everyone is trying to kill everyone, just passively hanging out is probably not a good idea.
To make it easier, several threads have mentioned merging the EVE and DUST514 forums to better the experience:
1. Creates stronger cross talk and social groups between both platforms
2. Collaborative idea sharing which prevents some of the good idea fairy crap we have seen from both forums when players who only play one game and do not understand the mechanics of the other chime in with a terrible idea.
3. Better access to the full range of information out there for all of New Eden - access to educational information is priceless
|
Rasatsu
Much Crying Old Experts
884
|
Posted - 2013.11.11 15:35:00 -
[162] - Quote
GM going full stupid by interfering in the use of known game mechanics?
Now that is going to get escalated to Internal Affairs quite fast... |
Vinsarrow
New Eden Blades Of The Azure
74
|
Posted - 2013.11.11 19:38:00 -
[163] - Quote
Leither Yiltron wrote:Vinsarrow wrote: Not alot of EVE players even know of this & no Dust 514 players know of it (till now) as we weren't told & if you haven't heard of shares how can you look into it?
I'm certainly not defending CCP's horrid lack of corporation and alliance management UI in Dust, but this kind of statement is simply incorrect. Most of the large Dust alliances are acutely aware of all the mechanics that underlie corporations, including the Eve mechanics. Your best resource is ALWAYS EVELOPEDIA; for instance: https://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/Corporation_management_guideYes, the UI needs to be integrated into Dust. But frankly you should always, always, ALWAYS read up on any mechanics you plan to interact with. Because CCP are slow to the ball, the underlying Eve mechanics are usually more complex. Check Evelopedia, and don't trust anyone you haven't known for a good long span of time or who is otherwise trustworthy with being CEO of your corporation. If your corp is big enough to need to be in an alliance and you don't have a truly trustworthy player to put in the application, you should be responsible enough to suck it up and pay the $15 necessary to sub an Eve account for a month and do it yourself. CCP are really money-grubbers in this situation, though. They really just want to force anyone who wants true control of their corporation to pay an Eve sub, which has always been a joke. All of their rhetoric about "simplifying" corps for Dust players is a product of this implicit aim. If they really wanted to simplify the interface in Dust they could put in a "use simplified corp UI" toggle in the menus.
It is wise to always look into everything but what I meant was share's is so little known alot of EVE players that have the system don't know of it & Dust doesn't have access to it unless through EVE. My point was due to it not being well known, not in Dust & no warning or explaination how do you know of share's to look into them.
Their is no in-game explaination that even tells you to look into things on EVEopedia, most games aren't this deep that require members to go on the Forums/internet to look deep into all this & as such many new comer or starter corporations have no real idea the extent of what they are getting into, my point is their needs o be better explaination other then "don't trust anyone & this is a very vast deep world" that is way too vague & far too basic.
The "Help" part in Dust is also horrible at explaining the deep intricate parts of Dust as well as EVE (example look at the in-game explaination of planetery conquest) it's very bad. Your basically telling us to look into it but we don't know what we're looking for, like saying look in a hay stack for something but not telling the something is a little tiny needle. |
Vinsarrow
New Eden Blades Of The Azure
74
|
Posted - 2013.11.11 19:53:00 -
[164] - Quote
Coyle Secundus wrote:Vala Prime wrote:Aeladon Leiko wrote:CCP Nullarbor wrote:The only way this happens is if you assign CEO of your corp to an EVE player. Even if they give the CEO title back they could have taken shares during their stay which gives them power to boot the current CEO using voting. It seems this is becoming increasingly common and confusing people so we will add a warning about it when you resign from CEO.
The shares and voting system is complicated and we purposefully did not include any of this in DUST. However once you have a mixed corporation you need to understand the implications of having both games involved. i hate to say this without testing it now but unless a change has been made in the last 3 months with regards to the way shares function you are 100% wrong. and i know it for a fact. all you need to take shares is be made a director. the director can then assign shares out of the wallet to him self. their is NOTHING dust side that can be done about this. its always worked like this. you need to check this out Null. and you are also right when an eve corp is made the share are public and can be taken by anyone that is ceo director or an accountant but once those share are allocated they can not be taken away unlees that share holder gives away his shares or all other share holders vote majority to remove those share. how ever in a dust made corp accoring to ccp nullarbor all shares are pre allocated to the ceo so that even a eve director can not touch them (its in his post) unless a eve pilot is made ceo such as to enter an alliance at such time the share are stripe from the dust player and made public for any eve pilot to get with out dust players able to do anything they can not even allocate the shares to someone else prior to switching with a eve pilot to prevent this from happening as well so in other words is in order to safely join an alliance in dust you have to get a computer pay ccp that monthly fee and make your own pilot the ceo
Which leads to why I call this a bug & exploit. If your in EVE/in a EVE corporation & you haven't heard of this, then it happens to you. You get a notice like Vala got a notice telling her & if your in EVE you have the ability to fight it so it's FAIR if you loose but you don't hear of this type of thing in EVE anyway because no 1 EVE player can use it against another EVE corporation easily & successfully.
Now this is where it becomes a bug/exploit if your a Dust corporation you don't have any tools for share's or warning or explaination of them. So you go to enter a alliance which is a necceisty in Dust 514 for almost every succesful corporation, but you need a EVE player to do it which this is where EVE guy's like Jihad know you NEED them & they are counting on you to count on them (which is by itself, makes no sense you have to do all this to enter a alliance anyway.)
So you make them CEO & they do this, then you have no way to fight it on the Dust side at all so they can overthrow a corporation of over 1000 Dust players with the mighty vote of 1? If that's not a exploit idk what is apparently.... The arguement it isn't a exploit is flawed. |
JoshuaEvil666
The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar DARKSTAR ARMY
69
|
Posted - 2013.11.12 05:05:00 -
[165] - Quote
people burn when I will it |
Rasatsu
Much Crying Old Experts
884
|
Posted - 2013.11.12 05:18:00 -
[166] - Quote
Vinsarrow wrote:Coyle Secundus wrote:Vala Prime wrote:Aeladon Leiko wrote:CCP Nullarbor wrote:The only way this happens is if you assign CEO of your corp to an EVE player. Even if they give the CEO title back they could have taken shares during their stay which gives them power to boot the current CEO using voting. It seems this is becoming increasingly common and confusing people so we will add a warning about it when you resign from CEO.
The shares and voting system is complicated and we purposefully did not include any of this in DUST. However once you have a mixed corporation you need to understand the implications of having both games involved. i hate to say this without testing it now but unless a change has been made in the last 3 months with regards to the way shares function you are 100% wrong. and i know it for a fact. all you need to take shares is be made a director. the director can then assign shares out of the wallet to him self. their is NOTHING dust side that can be done about this. its always worked like this. you need to check this out Null. and you are also right when an eve corp is made the share are public and can be taken by anyone that is ceo director or an accountant but once those share are allocated they can not be taken away unlees that share holder gives away his shares or all other share holders vote majority to remove those share. how ever in a dust made corp accoring to ccp nullarbor all shares are pre allocated to the ceo so that even a eve director can not touch them (its in his post) unless a eve pilot is made ceo such as to enter an alliance at such time the share are stripe from the dust player and made public for any eve pilot to get with out dust players able to do anything they can not even allocate the shares to someone else prior to switching with a eve pilot to prevent this from happening as well so in other words is in order to safely join an alliance in dust you have to get a computer pay ccp that monthly fee and make your own pilot the ceo péï Which leads to why I call this a bug & exploit. If your in EVE/in a EVE corporation & you haven't heard of this, then it happens to you. You get a notice like Vala got a notice telling her & if your in EVE you have the ability to fight it so it's FAIR if you loose but you don't hear of this type of thing in EVE anyway because no 1 EVE player can use it against another EVE corporation easily & successfully. Now this is where it becomes a bug/exploit if your a Dust corporation you don't have any tools for share's or warning or explaination of them. So you go to enter a alliance which is a necceisty in Dust 514 for almost every succesful corporation, but you need a EVE player to do it which this is where EVE guy's like Jihad know you NEED them & they are counting on you to count on them (which is by itself, makes no sense you have to do all this to enter a alliance anyway.) So you make them CEO & they do this, then you have no way to fight it on the Dust side at all so they can overthrow a corporation of over 1000 Dust players with the mighty vote of 1? If that's not a exploit idk what is apparently.... The arguement it isn't a exploit is flawed. Every single corp guide out there, even the eve wiki one, warns about this clear. The warnings are even highlighted in easy to spot sections just to make sure no one missesit.
Fighting after the knife is already in your back makes no sense. |
IgniteableAura
Pro Hic Immortalis
326
|
Posted - 2013.11.12 05:35:00 -
[167] - Quote
Can....not....face.....palm....hard.....enough.
Your corp was stolen. You can either pick up your sticks and start a new one with the learning experience you just got....OR you can keep wallowing over it.
PHI Recruitment
or PHIsh Tank in game
Twitch
|
NanoCleric
The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar DARKSTAR ARMY
95
|
Posted - 2013.11.12 15:39:00 -
[168] - Quote
Stop being so naieve guys... (these eve pilots and people who know about new eden).
Not everyone is in the same circumstances as you and I, where we can access a PC whenever we feel like it as we own one, nor does everyone have the time to look into things game related. To many people a game is a game and that's where it ends.
I know that Vala has not had easy access to a PC, and is certainly not computer literate. She's had to ask for a lot of help just to come to this forum alone.
Also there are plenty of console gamers out there who have no access to a PC, plenty of adults who have already gone through their schooling and uni.. or didn't have the oppertunity to, and are stuck in situations where money is a real problem.. so natrually won't head out to the nearest net cafe to read up on how alliances work or leading a corp works.
There's many players out there who will have just browsed the PSN Store, seen a free shooter... downloaded it, then simply just enjoyed playing it and making friends, before then seeing you can make a corp in the UI and tried it without knowing 'anything' about it. Then naturally through chatter you hear about alliances forming so they think they aught to join one.. so ask for help as to how.. Naturally they don't have an eve account or know anything about eve so when an eve pilot offers to help then they have no idea what the consequences are.. or even have a clue that they aught to read up on the consequences... Afterall... to them, it's just a game. They have no idea how deep the world of New Eden actually is.
Also, you guys keep banging on about experienced eve pilots, who are you point at exactly? I for one used an alt to help them join the alliance and have no experience with corp leading or what's involved, i've only ever been a mission runner really. I just used the procedure i previously outlined to join them in the alliance and was not told about any other consequences. Plus it was only a 5 minute thing then i left corp so i could be available 24hours later to help another corp join.
I'm unaware of Vala making any other eve pilots director, i'm also unaware of their being any experienced eve pilots in her corp.
As for you saying she had an alt eve pilot.. lol.. it was a trial account she made when she had chance to go on a pc.. and barely touched it and knew nothing about the world she was in. Everything she knows about the game she's had to ask other people about, so where are these experienced eve pilots who 'should have know better'?
You have to realize guys that in the same way you are so naieve to realize that not everyone is as knowledgeable or have access to pc's.. others are very ignorant about the what it was they actually downloaded and the potential risks beyond just clicking a UI button for something with the mentality 'oo, i wonder what this does'.
So i'm sorry guys, you did something clever and managed to steal corps, so your obviously not stupid people... but don't use naieve statements to back up your arguments. CCP dropped the ball on this one, you guys exposed it, and yes it is an exploit as it is 'exploiting a loophole in that build'. Simply due to CCP not taking into account that this could happen. That is what an exploit it.. to make use of a situation which can be considered to be unfair. |
Rasatsu
Much Crying Old Experts
891
|
Posted - 2013.11.12 16:04:00 -
[169] - Quote
Joining alliances should never be allowed with CCP-supported training wheels on just because you don't do Reading and Thinking. |
Ares 514
D.A.R.K L.E.G.I.O.N D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E
125
|
Posted - 2013.11.12 16:23:00 -
[170] - Quote
Rasatsu wrote:Joining alliances should never be allowed with CCP-supported training wheels on just because you don't do Reading and Thinking.
If it's not equal on both sides it's broken. IMO you EVE supporters and the Dust 514 sucks to be you concept is *#*$#*$. If we can do nothing with shares on this side then you should be able to do NOTHING with the shares of a corp CREATED on the dust side. Plain and simple.
Edit: CCP should just allocate the shares of a corp created on the dust side to the dust character that created the corp. Then everything is good until they allow dust characters to manage the shares. At which point you EVE players can try to steal them. |
|
Rasatsu
Much Crying Old Experts
891
|
Posted - 2013.11.12 16:58:00 -
[171] - Quote
This character can't fly spaceships, why not? |
Vinsarrow
New Eden Blades Of The Azure
76
|
Posted - 2013.11.12 22:44:00 -
[172] - Quote
NanoCleric wrote:Stop being so naieve guys... (these eve pilots and people who know about new eden).
Not everyone is in the same circumstances as you and I, where we can access a PC whenever we feel like it as we own one, nor does everyone have the time to look into things game related. To many people a game is a game and that's where it ends.
I know that Vala has not had easy access to a PC, and is certainly not computer literate. She's had to ask for a lot of help just to come to this forum alone.
Also there are plenty of console gamers out there who have no access to a PC, plenty of adults who have already gone through their schooling and uni.. or didn't have the oppertunity to, and are stuck in situations where money is a real problem.. so natrually won't head out to the nearest net cafe to read up on how alliances work or leading a corp works.
There's many players out there who will have just browsed the PSN Store, seen a free shooter... downloaded it, then simply just enjoyed playing it and making friends, before then seeing you can make a corp in the UI and tried it without knowing 'anything' about it. Then naturally through chatter you hear about alliances forming so they think they aught to join one.. so ask for help as to how.. Naturally they don't have an eve account or know anything about eve so when an eve pilot offers to help then they have no idea what the consequences are.. or even have a clue that they aught to read up on the consequences... Afterall... to them, it's just a game. They have no idea how deep the world of New Eden actually is.
Also, you guys keep banging on about experienced eve pilots, who are you point at exactly? I for one used an alt to help them join the alliance and have no experience with corp leading or what's involved, i've only ever been a mission runner really. I just used the procedure i previously outlined to join them in the alliance and was not told about any other consequences. Plus it was only a 5 minute thing then i left corp so i could be available 24hours later to help another corp join.
I'm unaware of Vala making any other eve pilots director, i'm also unaware of their being any experienced eve pilots in her corp.
As for you saying she had an alt eve pilot.. lol.. it was a trial account she made when she had chance to go on a pc.. and barely touched it and knew nothing about the world she was in. Everything she knows about the game she's had to ask other people about, so where are these experienced eve pilots who 'should have know better'?
You have to realize guys that in the same way you are so naieve to realize that not everyone is as knowledgeable or have access to pc's.. others are very ignorant about the what it was they actually downloaded and the potential risks beyond just clicking a UI button for something with the mentality 'oo, i wonder what this does'.
So i'm sorry guys, you did something clever and managed to steal corps, so your obviously not stupid people... but don't use naieve statements to back up your arguments. CCP dropped the ball on this one, you guys exposed it, and yes it is an exploit as it is 'exploiting a loophole in that build'. Simply due to CCP not taking into account that this could happen. That is what an exploit it.. to make use of a situation which can be considered to be unfair.
All very valid points, some of which myself & others have been making on this topic |
Vinsarrow
New Eden Blades Of The Azure
76
|
Posted - 2013.11.12 22:46:00 -
[173] - Quote
@ Rasatsu - Link it |
Vinsarrow
New Eden Blades Of The Azure
76
|
Posted - 2013.11.12 22:55:00 -
[174] - Quote
Speaking of which, did this happen to the original AE because their are 2 now & the original AE has a EVE player as CEO |
Vinsarrow
New Eden Blades Of The Azure
77
|
Posted - 2013.11.13 19:41:00 -
[175] - Quote
Bump |
RAider Vherikor
Holy Dust Divers
35
|
Posted - 2013.11.14 04:03:00 -
[176] - Quote
snakevenom369 wrote:hence why i stated above implementing a method in which a dust created corp original CEO could hold 50% of the shares would be held by that person no matter what the case this would seem like a simple yet useful method in which to protect a dust corporation from something like this happening again within the game itself
That stalemate only works if someone is there to actually counter the vote with their shares... all I have to do is wait for someone to go on vacation with my 5%... and I win your corp long enough to destroy it.
giggity giggity. |
RAider Vherikor
Holy Dust Divers
35
|
Posted - 2013.11.14 04:06:00 -
[177] - Quote
Ares 514 wrote:Rasatsu wrote:Joining alliances should never be allowed with CCP-supported training wheels on just because you don't do Reading and Thinking. If it's not equal on both sides it's broken. IMO you EVE supporters and the Dust 514 sucks to be you concept is *#*$#*$. If we can do nothing with shares on this side then you should be able to do NOTHING with the shares of a corp CREATED on the dust side. Plain and simple. Edit: CCP should just allocate the shares of a corp created on the dust side to the dust character that created the corp. Then everything is good until they allow dust characters to manage the shares. At which point you EVE players can try to steal them.
Who says it has to be just EVE players... a clone is a clone. It shouldnt matter what side.
Bring parity to the game so I can steal shares from ALL the corps. |
RAider Vherikor
Holy Dust Divers
35
|
Posted - 2013.11.14 04:06:00 -
[178] - Quote
NanoCleric wrote:Stop being so naieve guys... (these eve pilots and people who know about new eden).
Not everyone is in the same circumstances as you and I, where we can access a PC whenever we feel like it as we own one, nor does everyone have the time to look into things game related. To many people a game is a game and that's where it ends.
I know that Vala has not had easy access to a PC, and is certainly not computer literate. She's had to ask for a lot of help just to come to this forum alone.
Also there are plenty of console gamers out there who have no access to a PC, plenty of adults who have already gone through their schooling and uni.. or didn't have the oppertunity to, and are stuck in situations where money is a real problem.. so natrually won't head out to the nearest net cafe to read up on how alliances work or leading a corp works.
There's many players out there who will have just browsed the PSN Store, seen a free shooter... downloaded it, then simply just enjoyed playing it and making friends, before then seeing you can make a corp in the UI and tried it without knowing 'anything' about it. Then naturally through chatter you hear about alliances forming so they think they aught to join one.. so ask for help as to how.. Naturally they don't have an eve account or know anything about eve so when an eve pilot offers to help then they have no idea what the consequences are.. or even have a clue that they aught to read up on the consequences... Afterall... to them, it's just a game. They have no idea how deep the world of New Eden actually is.
Also, you guys keep banging on about experienced eve pilots, who are you point at exactly? I for one used an alt to help them join the alliance and have no experience with corp leading or what's involved, i've only ever been a mission runner really. I just used the procedure i previously outlined to join them in the alliance and was not told about any other consequences. Plus it was only a 5 minute thing then i left corp so i could be available 24hours later to help another corp join.
I'm unaware of Vala making any other eve pilots director, i'm also unaware of their being any experienced eve pilots in her corp.
As for you saying she had an alt eve pilot.. lol.. it was a trial account she made when she had chance to go on a pc.. and barely touched it and knew nothing about the world she was in. Everything she knows about the game she's had to ask other people about, so where are these experienced eve pilots who 'should have know better'?
You have to realize guys that in the same way you are so naieve to realize that not everyone is as knowledgeable or have access to pc's.. others are very ignorant about the what it was they actually downloaded and the potential risks beyond just clicking a UI button for something with the mentality 'oo, i wonder what this does'.
So i'm sorry guys, you did something clever and managed to steal corps, so your obviously not stupid people... but don't use naieve statements to back up your arguments. CCP dropped the ball on this one, you guys exposed it, and yes it is an exploit as it is 'exploiting a loophole in that build'. Simply due to CCP not taking into account that this could happen. That is what an exploit it.. to make use of a situation which can be considered to be unfair.
CCP says it is not an exploit now. Cheers.
|
DaNizzle4shizle
The dyst0pian Corporation Zero-Day
54
|
Posted - 2013.11.14 04:11:00 -
[179] - Quote
i have always seen a problem because dust ceo's have no way to join an alliance without eve. i find it in not fair in this case. this is exactly what happened to kill orders and THE GOD'Z THEMSELVES i find it stupid.
2nd Commander of The dyst0pian Corporation.
isk glitch> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6-HUgzYPm9g
|
RAider Vherikor
Holy Dust Divers
37
|
Posted - 2013.11.14 04:51:00 -
[180] - Quote
Vinsarrow wrote:Which leads to why I call this a bug & exploit. If your in EVE/in a EVE corporation & you haven't heard of this, then it happens to you. You get a notice like Vala got a notice telling her & if your in EVE you have the ability to fight it so it's FAIR if you loose but you don't hear of this type of thing in EVE anyway because no 1 EVE player can use it against another EVE corporation easily & successfully.
You must not understand how this works because most of what you are writing is not actually factual at all. Stop posting silliness like this or you will just attract more bad guys like me to your corp because it shows you are ready for the same thing. Let me give you some clarity because you really need it.
Once a bad guy has the shares... there is nothing ANYONE can do about when they place a vote. Only the shareholders can place the vote. EVE players can't fight back or do anything about it either. Its not fair because espionage/hostile take overs are not ever fair. Whomever has the shares controls the corp.
What little rock are you hiding in? This kind of thing happens all the time in EVE... Even from the big corps which should know better. I would suggest you do a google search and expand your mind if your rock has internet access.
Vinsarrow wrote: Now this is where it becomes a bug/exploit if your a Dust corporation you don't have any tools for share's or warning or explaination of them. So you go to enter a alliance which is a necceisty in Dust 514 for almost every succesful corporation, but you need a EVE player to do it which this is where EVE guy's like Jihad know you NEED them & they are counting on you to count on them (which is by itself, makes no sense you have to do all this to enter a alliance anyway.)
So you make them CEO & they do this, then you have no way to fight it on the Dust side at all so they can overthrow a corporation of over 1000 Dust players with the mighty vote of 1? If that's not a exploit idk what is apparently.... The arguement it isn't a exploit is flawed.
I will add in the case of DUST CORE they had made another alt CEO long before Jihad got there, Jihad just had the shares dropped in his lap when he joined up later. (He says "thanks" for that to the angel who did that for him). The CEO at the time also had an EVE character as well and even then they didnt know better. If a corp chooses a leader who is naive, ignorant or just plain dumb that is too bad. Most sharp people out there would recommend against joining corps which are run by them and are unable to have the strategic vision to understand the New Eden pitfalls.
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |