|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 12 post(s) |
Vinsarrow
New Eden Blades Of The Azure
61
|
Posted - 2013.11.07 23:16:00 -
[1] - Quote
Good thing I was always.... stingy with my CEO & Director role's after-all...
I have noticed & mentioned before Corporation issues such as the need for a Corporation invite option in Dust 514 & a Corporation alliance option in Dust 514 among a few other things. But that aside I assume CCP will fix it (preferably soon) us having to transfer our CEO to a EVE player just to alliance is rather insane & having a alliance leads to many benefits & stratgic advantage's leading to imporatant gameplay in PC, match sycning, meeting up, discussing matters, squading up & much more.
But I digress, in this situation I have only a few suggestions till CCP fixes this but they might be able to help. I suggest the CEO, &/or Directors make a EVE character (if you already have EVE players in the corporation call upon them) join the corporation & have them become a part of this & vote against it. You do get 14 days free in EVE that's more then enough quite possibly in time to counter this perhaps.
In the future the best I have to offer in tip's for scenario's such as this are when you enter alliance possibly create & use a EVE player for it that way you know that it's you, the true CEO with the CEO role. If that can't be worked out I'd remove & give all the Corporation ISK to the CEO to hold till the alliance is made & the role returned.
If things don't work-out well in the end Vala our Corporation will aid you & Dust Core as best we can, you need but only ask of us till then we'll be on stand-by for you. |
Vinsarrow
New Eden Blades Of The Azure
61
|
Posted - 2013.11.07 23:21:00 -
[2] - Quote
CCP Nullarbor wrote:Forlorn Destrier wrote:[CCP's stance that this is not a critical item at this time is bull. I respect CCP Nullabar, but he is living in a cloud world on this issue. The players need a way to protect themselves; taking on risks without knowing is stupid. I absolutely agree with this statement and we will brainstorm some ways to fix the confusion, players should not have their corporation stolen without understanding why or the risks they are taking on. There may be some changes to the handling of shares that make this process safer for CEOs to manage, so I will have a conversation with the team about that as well. However the reality is that revamping the corporation system or integrating alliances into dust would be a fantastic but very expensive task. At this stage, we can provide so much more value into the game with that development time instead, which is why it is lower priority for us. EVE did not have alliances for a couple of years (2004 iirc), we will get there in the end it's just going to take a bit of time.
Also we should raise this issue & push on about it but people look a DEV is already on it & that's the first step, it's also 1 of the best things we could hope for so far at this time. Being hard on him like that is a bit much in my opinion, we need only keep the topic alive & raised till it's fixed they are already on it. - To DEV, Thank You but know that we are counting on you guys.... |
Vinsarrow
New Eden Blades Of The Azure
61
|
Posted - 2013.11.07 23:23:00 -
[3] - Quote
Cenex Langly wrote:Mac Dac wrote:Im still kind of confused on the whole thing.
What are these shares? What do they do? Does that EVE pilot have total control over the corp? And des said EVE pilot have control over the corp tax?
from what i read, an EVE pilot can take over a dust corp effortlessly without does players able to do anything. Is this right?
Honensty, i am worried about other EVE pilots finding out about this and using to "pimp" us mercs for the little ISK we have. I mean if they get complete access to the corp tax and corp wallet. Your corp wallets are safe as there is absolutely no way for an EVE player to take ISK from the dust wallet. They are separate from each other.
Not for long.... |
Vinsarrow
New Eden Blades Of The Azure
61
|
Posted - 2013.11.07 23:25:00 -
[4] - Quote
Delta 749 wrote:CCP Nullarbor wrote:The only way this happens is if you assign CEO of your corp to an EVE player. Even if they give the CEO title back they could have taken shares during their stay which gives them power to boot the current CEO using voting. It seems this is becoming increasingly common and confusing people so we will add a warning about it when you resign from CEO.
The shares and voting system is complicated and we purposefully did not include any of this in DUST. However once you have a mixed corporation you need to understand the implications of having both games involved. Or you know, just let Dust players form alliances without having to involve EVE players since its a huge gaping flaw in the system
Like, Like & Like.... Oh wait, you can only like 1 comment once.... |
Vinsarrow
New Eden Blades Of The Azure
61
|
Posted - 2013.11.07 23:28:00 -
[5] - Quote
Soraya Xel wrote:Most of the top corps in the game are in some form of alliance. And it has an extremely strong effect on how PC battles are carried out. Failing to see the importance of it being represented in game is a rookie mistake.
*Like* >.> |
Vinsarrow
New Eden Blades Of The Azure
64
|
Posted - 2013.11.08 03:11:00 -
[6] - Quote
Bump |
Vinsarrow
New Eden Blades Of The Azure
64
|
Posted - 2013.11.08 03:28:00 -
[7] - Quote
Curious though, how did this happen & who's the EVE player responsible so we can get out the pitch forks & torches.
|
Vinsarrow
New Eden Blades Of The Azure
70
|
Posted - 2013.11.08 20:43:00 -
[8] - Quote
Forlorn Destrier wrote:CCP Nullarbor wrote:Forlorn Destrier wrote:[CCP's stance that this is not a critical item at this time is bull. I respect CCP Nullabar, but he is living in a cloud world on this issue. The players need a way to protect themselves; taking on risks without knowing is stupid. I absolutely agree with this statement and we will brainstorm some ways to fix the confusion, players should not have their corporation stolen without understanding why or the risks they are taking on. There may be some changes to the handling of shares that make this process safer for CEOs to manage, so I will have a conversation with the team about that as well. However the reality is that revamping the corporation system or integrating alliances into dust would be a fantastic but very expensive task. At this stage, we can provide so much more value into the game with that development time instead, which is why it is lower priority for us. EVE did not have alliances for a couple of years (2004 iirc), we will get there in the end it's just going to take a bit of time. Ty thoughts on this: 1. I respect where you are coming, however the analogy of alliances in Eve and Dust is a flawed analogy. The reason is that the alliance mechanics are impact Dust today due to the fact that corproations are mixed, and you have given limited mechanics in Dust that involve alliance functionality. When alliances were introduced into Eve, there was nothing like it prior - meaning this was a wholly new concept whereas in Dust it is not. 2. This statement is more comprehensive than your previous ones - part of what upset me and others is that you appeared to be getting defensive without actually explaining anything 3. CCP should revert ownership and shares of the OP's corp immediately. 4. CCP should introduce warning message at multiple levels (assigning roles; resigning CEO title, creating corporation, etc) to present all of the dangers herein until such time that CCP can devote development resources to introduce proper mechanics; this sould be done immediately as well. 5. As the executor of my alliance, things like this really irk me because it impacts my player base greatly. Personally, this does not impact me directly as I know the dangers as a long time Eve player (6 years and counting). That said, it does impact me indirectly in my ability to recruit new corps from Dust into my alliance, as well as the ability to protect my players from unseen threats, which is the responsibility of any corp or alliance CEO. Now comes the fun part - I normally don't play the "disgruntled customer" card, but the fact of the matter is I am a long term subscriber to Eve with 4 accounts (and as someone in Eve who rarely actually makes ISK because I don't enjoy that aspect, I am someone who pays real world money for 4 accounts every month) plus 2 in Dust. This issue impacts my ability to play Eve the way that I want - and so now what you have is a free to play game negatively impacting a paying customer in a different game. CCP's lack of forethought here is amazingly obvious to me. Were this only impactful to players who are not required to pay a subscription to play the game (i.e. Dust only players), the problems are lessened (albeit they are still significant). This, however, can potentially impact a lot of things in Eve - and I don't get the feeling that you realize this. 6. I hereby call for an official statement from CCP announcing the plans to implement the "bandaid" warnings in the game, and how soon we can expect them. I would also call on CCP to acknowledge that the OP's corp will be returned to him as a sign of good faith. I do so with the full understanding that CCP is not required to do so - though from a PR perspective this is a great opportunity that CCP would be foolish to ignore. 7. And finally, to the OP - my sympathies for you. If there is anything I can do to assist you (which, to be honest, I doubt there will be), please message me in game. If it is something that is in my power to do, and is reasonable, I will do what I can for you. Thanks for listening.
I agree this all is valid reasoning. Not much to say beyond that lol |
Vinsarrow
New Eden Blades Of The Azure
70
|
Posted - 2013.11.08 20:59:00 -
[9] - Quote
We need tools more then a warning but a deep informational warning should be eventually put in. I think this is a neccesity in Dust 514 before it gets worse Dust 514 CEO's need a alliance option themselves & more ways to guard themselves. This is argueably more urgent then certain upcoming content as it is a deep & near game breaking issue.
I also agree, you as well as many others shouldn't have to be hurt gameplay wise because you wanted to do a neccesity that is supposed to be in the game alliances are very much needed in New Eden. Now that this is more known people will hear of it so this is a extreme example.
Top Corporations such as SVER, Red Star, DUST CORE, Dust University, MHPD, OH (too I think), PX1 & MANY MANY more are in alliances like Public Disorder, DARKSTAR ARMY, & EoN. are ALL at risk. A war breaks out (like the recent 1 with SVER, TP, OH, PX1 & OH) instead of it happening like it did in Molden Heath they decide to war with share's - imagine the destruction, every corporation in top alliances suddenly get attacked through share's is put simply a nightmare. The possiblity is their....
1 corporation purposely designed for this type of warfare style could near single handedly destroy all corporations in every top alliance financially with share's leaving many in ruin & perhaps thousands of players in shock. That is a worse case scenario unlikely to ever happen but the mere possiblity it can be allowed to be done is insane by itself, which is the point I'm making. |
Vinsarrow
New Eden Blades Of The Azure
70
|
Posted - 2013.11.08 21:05:00 -
[10] - Quote
TrueXer0z wrote:Some posts were TLDR, but in all honesty, If a dust player is allowed to start and maintain a corp/alliance, that dust player should have the same access to all the different tools an eve player should. This just gives an unfair advantage to someone with an eve account. I am all for someone underhandedly stealing a corp, or doing something to dismantle a corp..it is part of the game we play. But, if a Dust merc is not given the ability to defend his corp on the same level of a eve player, then we are looking at an unbalanced playing field via Meta game. This also includes the inability to admin dust made chat channels. Which is something I have be advocating since the beginning.
A very valid point. |
|
Vinsarrow
New Eden Blades Of The Azure
71
|
Posted - 2013.11.10 19:20:00 -
[11] - Quote
low genius wrote:Rasatsu wrote:TrueXer0z wrote:You got ****ed out of your corp due to the inability to assign shares from the dust client.
Good luck man. I hope you get your corp back. This is not your fault either. The fault relies in a broken system between the eve and dust corp UIs. The fault lays with the OP, not the system. If they had done the obvious thing and read up some more on corp safety it clearly says on pretty much every guide to secure the shares. They didn't even seem to know about shares, yet entrusted their corp CEO role to someone. exactly. which part of "the most back-stabbing cutthroat videogame in the world" was misleading?
Not exactly this clearly over-rules the game, no guard against it & you can't really repay the guy with a well layed plan to take your revenge. It's flawed in far too many area's on this 1 |
Vinsarrow
New Eden Blades Of The Azure
71
|
Posted - 2013.11.10 19:23:00 -
[12] - Quote
SgtDoughnut wrote:He may have had roles from a previous corp that allowed him to access shares and start the vote, its a bug they never really fixed in EvE and thats the reason any new good corp you join requires you to drop roles first (takes 24 hours) then join them.
wow it's more broke then we thought then.... |
Vinsarrow
New Eden Blades Of The Azure
71
|
Posted - 2013.11.10 19:26:00 -
[13] - Quote
Draco Cerberus wrote:A quick check on the attributes of Dust Core from Eve side indicates that at one point in time someone added shares to the corporation. Current number of shares is 1001, which is 1 more share than what a new corporation starts with. I would guess that when a director he added one share and transferred it to himself to allow himself a foothold if it was ever needed.
just wow.... this seriously needs fixed because this can destroy way too much & I can practically gurantee people will rage quit if they're corporation gets destroyed, loose they're people to a split, all the ISK, friendships get shook & loose all they're districts. |
Vinsarrow
New Eden Blades Of The Azure
71
|
Posted - 2013.11.10 19:37:00 -
[14] - Quote
Vala Prime wrote:Im losing my corp right now and dont think its fair. I cant remove Jihad destroyer 011011 from my corp and cant vote against him. He want give back the shares he blocked me from accepting any apps into the corp. He is not director but got all my shares is now trying get rid of me. I hate that Im lossing my corp right . We on dust need to see the shares on here and control them. no one know this can happen on dust side could happen and did . I just want my shares back and him gone from this corp. He kicked people from my corp . This is not right my corp been around sent close beta . Next time lets us have rights to fix this problem and not be screwed im so screwed. Im not eve player didnt know about shares and he not director. By the way Jihad destroyer 011011 is saying he didnt do this when i have the notification that says what happen.
Take a picture of the msg that told you Vala & DL it onto your PS3 if you can then if need be you can show it to ppl if they need proof, that was absolutely insane I'm considering calling upon people to raise ISK & get a EVE player (or 5 of them) to hunt & destroy this Jihad guy nonestop & they'll need proof they killed him, shouldn't be hard to locate him through his friends or someone can befriend him enough to get him somewhere might be fun to repay him for his wrong doing.
Maybe have a Titan waiting for him to destroy him with some other players. the guy has it coming at this point.
btw If Jihad didn't do it as he says why did he not make you CEO or offered to aid you with the shares, the vote & etc. - boom, flaw in his arguement just saying.
Still VERY glad CCP helped you though Vala. +1 for CCP & they're awesome ways |
Vinsarrow
New Eden Blades Of The Azure
71
|
Posted - 2013.11.10 19:55:00 -
[15] - Quote
NanoCleric wrote:Just a quick update all...
I logged on tonight to check if Vala had the corp back and she hasn't.
I have no idea what CCP did to help, but it's not succeeded. When Vala logged on today at the end of the vote timer with the hope she could have her CEO powers unblocked due to the vote ending.. she found that Jihad had control of the corp, which resulted in him kicking the players who have been supporting her.
Now Jihad has transferred CEO to RAider Vherikor and Vala has no control over the corp anymore.
By his own admission on the EVE forums, Jihad has posted announcing the exploit he found and used against DUST CORE, and mentions he has hit multiple corps via this 'bug/exploit' between the games.
CCP This is your own fault for bad coding, and this coming from someone who works in the game industry himself. You have proivided players with no way to defend themselves from espionage in this instance. If they could defend themselves and lost it, then fair enough.. that's the world of New Eden, but due to bad choices, you have given players the ability to ruin someone's hard work without being challenged.
This should be put to rights to undo your mistake, to reinstate control of the corps to their owners. As mentioned.. i would support the espionage if it was fair and Dust CEO's had mechanics to defend themselves. Since there are no mechanics to do such, then you should put these to rights, and put in defenses against it. Any other course of action imho is down to negligence.
So sorry.. despite CCP claiming they have helped, The theft was successful.
Exactly what I mean lol |
Vinsarrow
New Eden Blades Of The Azure
71
|
Posted - 2013.11.10 20:05:00 -
[16] - Quote
Jihad Destroyer 011011 wrote ALL of the following below on the EVE Forums
#1Posted: 2013.11.10 16:27 | Edited by: Jihad Destroyer 011011
DUST514 Corp Leaders are getting favoritism over EVE Corp Leaders. Recently several of us have been doing very bad things to corps from within. Corp Espionage has been and should always be considered normal to meta game play in New Eden. it is part of what makes what we do special. We started our plans over 7 months ago and started pulling the triggers on multiple corps in the last few days... In a true sandbox game if you don't do your homework you will get burned HARD. These corps were aligning against some equities we support and decided now was the time.
Recently in several espionage operations GMs have been stepping in to stop or delay corps with DUST members from being taken over rightfully by our team of crack black box operators using normal and well documented espionage methods which I will not go into here. This is an unfair protection of corps with DUST members. I will not post the GMs comments but suffice to say they are hand holding the corps with DUST members and intervening on their behalf to save them unfairly.
Failure of the Build Clearly all Corps and their leaders SHOULD definitely have access to their shares in EVE and DUST514. Majority DUST514 Corps should not have to have an EVE alt join them to become part of an alliance. Those however are not exploits they are failures of the game build at this time and much higher priority should be placed on getting the code written to allow corps to manage their corps on an equal basis with EVE corp leaders. Additionally EVE leaders should have the same parity to issue DUST specific roles which were recently introduced.
Definitely not an Exploit At no point were any of the conspiring alts made CEO to cause the shares to be created in the first place, and in a true sandbox game if you do not do your homework and learn you will get burned. Let them burn. I was the second one in for every case, they all had EVE members besides me with experience and therefore we were operating clearly within the mechanics of the game. GMs jumping in the way they did shows favoritism for DUST514 members which paying EVE players NEVER get.
Examples: While not related to me it is a good example: A corp believes there is a bug and towards the end it comes out the espionage agent was really good at covering his tracks and the CEO/Director is unable to understand what is happening to him. How is this the espionage operators fault? It isn't. The purpose of Espionage involves sewing deception and confusion into their ranks to further cause issues. (as a side note I spoke with the agent that did this, In their corp channel the corp members began threatening the espionage agents real life afterwards. Not the kind of people we want talking to kids who may be playing the game if you ask me. ) https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=119273&find=unread
In this next case the CEO is reasonably expected to be upset, they just had their corp stolen, however they went and begged for help and were given an unfair protection from GMs because they "dont know the rules". If I did this in EVE I would have gotten a "Too bad man, HTFU." This espionage is clearly not an exploit as they had admitted to having a great deal of very experienced members in EVE in their corp the whole time, and the leaders were not very smart about their choices. (Also this was legendary in the rage posting from their whole alliance in their EVEmails to me for the last two days. https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=119973
Opportunity for Course Correction So we ask for parity... Corps with DUST leadership should not get special treatment and protections and CCP should really consider putting a priority on ensuring equality and access to roles for EVE and DUST514 leaders managing a corp. Also please consider merging the DUST514 forums into the EVE forums so the DUST players can learn and not suffer in isolation any longer.
Link to it: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=3856933#post3856933 |
Vinsarrow
New Eden Blades Of The Azure
71
|
Posted - 2013.11.10 20:07:00 -
[17] - Quote
That ^ makes me near sick to read & practically slaps Vala, Dust 514, CCP & everyone here in the face |
Vinsarrow
New Eden Blades Of The Azure
71
|
Posted - 2013.11.10 20:27:00 -
[18] - Quote
Here's some more if you all aren't displeased enough already
#16Posted: 2013.11.10 18:50 | Edited by: Jihad Destroyer 011011
TigerXtrm wrote:
stoicfaux wrote: Interesting reads.
https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=1473172#post1473172
CCPNullarbor wrote: The shares and voting system is complicated and we purposefully did not include any of this in DUST. However once you have a mixed corporation you need to understand the implications of having both games involved.
On one hand we have the "spirit of EVE". On the other we have DUST. Is it really a good idea to hotdrop the Dusties (aka a FPS console game) with full blown EVE mechanics (i.e. villainy) and excessive complexity? I can see arguments for both sides; integrating with EVE means working in a cold dark untrusting universe, however, it's a damn FPS console game with a different audience, different attention span, limited user interface, etc..
Does CCP want DUST to be as cold and harsh as EVE (i.e. have the same audience, potentially a small niche) or do they want to expand their audience with DUST? If it's the latter, then CCP will need to make DUST less vulnerable (or more buffered/firewalled) to the harshness of EVE.
This pretty much.
Different audience requires a different approach. The average F2P FPS player isn't going to expect, let alone be part of, the EVE meta game of espionage etc. If you start allowing that stuff it's a powder keg of bad publicity waiting to happen for Dust. The 'simple' FPS players who just want to shoot stuff for half an hour will start complaining about how Dust is an unfair game how they got scammed out of their corp. Perfectly legit as it may be, a casual FPS gamer will never ever understand it.
So no, bad idea. Dust is NOT EVE. Dust is connected to EVE and nothing more. I clearly see CCP's reasoning in protecting Dust corps on this matter.
Edit: Oh and...
Quote: GMs jumping in the way they did shows favoritism for DUST514 members which paying EVE players NEVER get.
When did all this 'all should be equal and fair' crap become a theme? It's starting to get annoying.
if they want to just play then there are many other FPS out there. There is a reason EVE is not a larger player base- it is harsh and cold place. DUST514 getting different treatment is ripe for a different kind of exploit later where DUST514 members are able to meta game but are put in a protected status.
The point of my post is GIVE leaders in both corps equal footing for shares and roles selections to manage their teams. DUST corp leaders have already robbed each other before and it was allowed. This is just a different flavor of the same thing. |
Vinsarrow
New Eden Blades Of The Azure
74
|
Posted - 2013.11.11 19:38:00 -
[19] - Quote
Leither Yiltron wrote:Vinsarrow wrote: Not alot of EVE players even know of this & no Dust 514 players know of it (till now) as we weren't told & if you haven't heard of shares how can you look into it?
I'm certainly not defending CCP's horrid lack of corporation and alliance management UI in Dust, but this kind of statement is simply incorrect. Most of the large Dust alliances are acutely aware of all the mechanics that underlie corporations, including the Eve mechanics. Your best resource is ALWAYS EVELOPEDIA; for instance: https://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/Corporation_management_guideYes, the UI needs to be integrated into Dust. But frankly you should always, always, ALWAYS read up on any mechanics you plan to interact with. Because CCP are slow to the ball, the underlying Eve mechanics are usually more complex. Check Evelopedia, and don't trust anyone you haven't known for a good long span of time or who is otherwise trustworthy with being CEO of your corporation. If your corp is big enough to need to be in an alliance and you don't have a truly trustworthy player to put in the application, you should be responsible enough to suck it up and pay the $15 necessary to sub an Eve account for a month and do it yourself. CCP are really money-grubbers in this situation, though. They really just want to force anyone who wants true control of their corporation to pay an Eve sub, which has always been a joke. All of their rhetoric about "simplifying" corps for Dust players is a product of this implicit aim. If they really wanted to simplify the interface in Dust they could put in a "use simplified corp UI" toggle in the menus.
It is wise to always look into everything but what I meant was share's is so little known alot of EVE players that have the system don't know of it & Dust doesn't have access to it unless through EVE. My point was due to it not being well known, not in Dust & no warning or explaination how do you know of share's to look into them.
Their is no in-game explaination that even tells you to look into things on EVEopedia, most games aren't this deep that require members to go on the Forums/internet to look deep into all this & as such many new comer or starter corporations have no real idea the extent of what they are getting into, my point is their needs o be better explaination other then "don't trust anyone & this is a very vast deep world" that is way too vague & far too basic.
The "Help" part in Dust is also horrible at explaining the deep intricate parts of Dust as well as EVE (example look at the in-game explaination of planetery conquest) it's very bad. Your basically telling us to look into it but we don't know what we're looking for, like saying look in a hay stack for something but not telling the something is a little tiny needle. |
Vinsarrow
New Eden Blades Of The Azure
74
|
Posted - 2013.11.11 19:53:00 -
[20] - Quote
Coyle Secundus wrote:Vala Prime wrote:Aeladon Leiko wrote:CCP Nullarbor wrote:The only way this happens is if you assign CEO of your corp to an EVE player. Even if they give the CEO title back they could have taken shares during their stay which gives them power to boot the current CEO using voting. It seems this is becoming increasingly common and confusing people so we will add a warning about it when you resign from CEO.
The shares and voting system is complicated and we purposefully did not include any of this in DUST. However once you have a mixed corporation you need to understand the implications of having both games involved. i hate to say this without testing it now but unless a change has been made in the last 3 months with regards to the way shares function you are 100% wrong. and i know it for a fact. all you need to take shares is be made a director. the director can then assign shares out of the wallet to him self. their is NOTHING dust side that can be done about this. its always worked like this. you need to check this out Null. and you are also right when an eve corp is made the share are public and can be taken by anyone that is ceo director or an accountant but once those share are allocated they can not be taken away unlees that share holder gives away his shares or all other share holders vote majority to remove those share. how ever in a dust made corp accoring to ccp nullarbor all shares are pre allocated to the ceo so that even a eve director can not touch them (its in his post) unless a eve pilot is made ceo such as to enter an alliance at such time the share are stripe from the dust player and made public for any eve pilot to get with out dust players able to do anything they can not even allocate the shares to someone else prior to switching with a eve pilot to prevent this from happening as well so in other words is in order to safely join an alliance in dust you have to get a computer pay ccp that monthly fee and make your own pilot the ceo
Which leads to why I call this a bug & exploit. If your in EVE/in a EVE corporation & you haven't heard of this, then it happens to you. You get a notice like Vala got a notice telling her & if your in EVE you have the ability to fight it so it's FAIR if you loose but you don't hear of this type of thing in EVE anyway because no 1 EVE player can use it against another EVE corporation easily & successfully.
Now this is where it becomes a bug/exploit if your a Dust corporation you don't have any tools for share's or warning or explaination of them. So you go to enter a alliance which is a necceisty in Dust 514 for almost every succesful corporation, but you need a EVE player to do it which this is where EVE guy's like Jihad know you NEED them & they are counting on you to count on them (which is by itself, makes no sense you have to do all this to enter a alliance anyway.)
So you make them CEO & they do this, then you have no way to fight it on the Dust side at all so they can overthrow a corporation of over 1000 Dust players with the mighty vote of 1? If that's not a exploit idk what is apparently.... The arguement it isn't a exploit is flawed. |
|
Vinsarrow
New Eden Blades Of The Azure
76
|
Posted - 2013.11.12 22:44:00 -
[21] - Quote
NanoCleric wrote:Stop being so naieve guys... (these eve pilots and people who know about new eden).
Not everyone is in the same circumstances as you and I, where we can access a PC whenever we feel like it as we own one, nor does everyone have the time to look into things game related. To many people a game is a game and that's where it ends.
I know that Vala has not had easy access to a PC, and is certainly not computer literate. She's had to ask for a lot of help just to come to this forum alone.
Also there are plenty of console gamers out there who have no access to a PC, plenty of adults who have already gone through their schooling and uni.. or didn't have the oppertunity to, and are stuck in situations where money is a real problem.. so natrually won't head out to the nearest net cafe to read up on how alliances work or leading a corp works.
There's many players out there who will have just browsed the PSN Store, seen a free shooter... downloaded it, then simply just enjoyed playing it and making friends, before then seeing you can make a corp in the UI and tried it without knowing 'anything' about it. Then naturally through chatter you hear about alliances forming so they think they aught to join one.. so ask for help as to how.. Naturally they don't have an eve account or know anything about eve so when an eve pilot offers to help then they have no idea what the consequences are.. or even have a clue that they aught to read up on the consequences... Afterall... to them, it's just a game. They have no idea how deep the world of New Eden actually is.
Also, you guys keep banging on about experienced eve pilots, who are you point at exactly? I for one used an alt to help them join the alliance and have no experience with corp leading or what's involved, i've only ever been a mission runner really. I just used the procedure i previously outlined to join them in the alliance and was not told about any other consequences. Plus it was only a 5 minute thing then i left corp so i could be available 24hours later to help another corp join.
I'm unaware of Vala making any other eve pilots director, i'm also unaware of their being any experienced eve pilots in her corp.
As for you saying she had an alt eve pilot.. lol.. it was a trial account she made when she had chance to go on a pc.. and barely touched it and knew nothing about the world she was in. Everything she knows about the game she's had to ask other people about, so where are these experienced eve pilots who 'should have know better'?
You have to realize guys that in the same way you are so naieve to realize that not everyone is as knowledgeable or have access to pc's.. others are very ignorant about the what it was they actually downloaded and the potential risks beyond just clicking a UI button for something with the mentality 'oo, i wonder what this does'.
So i'm sorry guys, you did something clever and managed to steal corps, so your obviously not stupid people... but don't use naieve statements to back up your arguments. CCP dropped the ball on this one, you guys exposed it, and yes it is an exploit as it is 'exploiting a loophole in that build'. Simply due to CCP not taking into account that this could happen. That is what an exploit it.. to make use of a situation which can be considered to be unfair.
All very valid points, some of which myself & others have been making on this topic |
Vinsarrow
New Eden Blades Of The Azure
76
|
Posted - 2013.11.12 22:46:00 -
[22] - Quote
@ Rasatsu - Link it |
Vinsarrow
New Eden Blades Of The Azure
76
|
Posted - 2013.11.12 22:55:00 -
[23] - Quote
Speaking of which, did this happen to the original AE because their are 2 now & the original AE has a EVE player as CEO |
Vinsarrow
New Eden Blades Of The Azure
77
|
Posted - 2013.11.13 19:41:00 -
[24] - Quote
Bump |
Vinsarrow
New Eden Blades Of The Azure
80
|
Posted - 2013.11.14 20:47:00 -
[25] - Quote
RAider Vherikor wrote:Vinsarrow wrote:Which leads to why I call this a bug & exploit. If your in EVE/in a EVE corporation & you haven't heard of this, then it happens to you. You get a notice like Vala got a notice telling her & if your in EVE you have the ability to fight it so it's FAIR if you loose but you don't hear of this type of thing in EVE anyway because no 1 EVE player can use it against another EVE corporation easily & successfully. You must not understand how this works because most of what you are writing is not actually factual at all. Stop posting silliness like this or you will just attract more bad guys like me to your corp because it shows you are ready for the same thing. Let me give you some clarity because you really need it. Once a bad guy has the shares... there is nothing ANYONE can do about when they place a vote. Only the shareholders can place the vote. EVE players can't fight back or do anything about it either. Its not fair because espionage/hostile take overs are not ever fair. Whomever has the shares controls the corp. What little rock are you hiding in? This kind of thing happens all the time in EVE... Even from the big corps which should know better. I would suggest you do a google search and expand your mind if your rock has internet access. Vinsarrow wrote: Now this is where it becomes a bug/exploit if your a Dust corporation you don't have any tools for share's or warning or explaination of them. So you go to enter a alliance which is a necceisty in Dust 514 for almost every succesful corporation, but you need a EVE player to do it which this is where EVE guy's like Jihad know you NEED them & they are counting on you to count on them (which is by itself, makes no sense you have to do all this to enter a alliance anyway.)
So you make them CEO & they do this, then you have no way to fight it on the Dust side at all so they can overthrow a corporation of over 1000 Dust players with the mighty vote of 1? If that's not a exploit idk what is apparently.... The arguement it isn't a exploit is flawed. I will add in the case of DUST CORE they had made another alt CEO long before Jihad got there, Jihad just had the shares dropped in his lap when he joined up later. (He says "thanks" for that to the angel who did that for him). The CEO at the time also had an EVE character as well and even then they didnt know better. If a corp chooses a leader who is naive, ignorant or just plain dumb that is too bad. Most sharp people out there would recommend against joining corps which are run by them and are unable to have the strategic vision to understand the New Eden pitfalls.
Please dolink where CCP says it isn't a exploit in a official anoucement. Also it is fair on the EVE side you forget about the share holders as well as the precautions a EVE player can do with the share's & corporation ISK, who have actual tools to prevent & fight it on a level. Furthermore you obviously failed to read the part that Vala made a trial EVE character when she had actual access to a PC, plus it was only temporary.
She went through ALOT just to get up a simple forums post, also about Jihad you know very little about that situation, which will remain so. You also forget EVERY corporation gets automatic share's. Also your in a corporation yourself so don't get hypocritical.
|
Vinsarrow
New Eden Blades Of The Azure
80
|
Posted - 2013.11.14 21:11:00 -
[26] - Quote
Now RAider, about your little.... "threat" to me I will now quote you "I love the EVEmails threatening to come after me and my buddies in Caldari Faction Warfare. Harden up and join the Gallente side and come get me... I dare you to kill me repeatedly if you can even get to a match with me."
If you can EVEN find me please do try me & those in my squad & if I care enough I'd happily pay those in my squad if we crossed for every 5 times they kills you they get 1 million ISK & a additonal 450k if you were in proto gear.That's if I cared enough & if we actually crossed or if I even recall you by then. But anyway public & Factional's are far too big for us to easily cross & since we don't have a District you can't attack usdirectly just to summon me.
Let me clarify to everyone about you though from what my sources have told me in less then 24 hours on you. You are apparently a troll & hard reject. You have 6 RAider alts if they aren't you then you've made quite a few "friends" in New Eden. Your first player-made coporation you were in was THE GOD'Z THEMSELVES after them you joined DUST CORE very odd this so far but let me go on, after DUST CORE you joined Death by Disassociation whom dy5t0pia (creater of the Zero-Day alliance you just bashed) was a former member of, after which you rejoined DUST CORE & now your in Holy Dust Divers.
Am I sensing a link here? I think I am indeed.... but let me move on to Holy Dust Divers which currently has 24 members & is relatively new, who's 5 oldest members are tomtom, Git'rite, nate, Daj & MAUI not counting yourself RAider. Former members are Charlotte, Malice, Sebastian, & Thatguy I believe from according to my resources. I'm sure they'd tell me a little about HDD & You for a little.... financial aid making destroying you all MUCH easier if ever need be or perhaps just you RAider i'm sure someone can tell me your play style rather easily among other things. Oh & infiltrating us is your plan? Good Luck with that nothing to find or use in our corporation really also only very special people can touch our corporation ISK.....
So I guess your threat is empty while my defense is not i'm sure also all the "friends" you made in New Eden would LOVE to "help" with you quite possibly free of charge too. But in all honesty I don't care for you just don't bring your New Eden personal problems & vendetta's my way. Thank You & Good Day. RAider.... |
Vinsarrow
New Eden Blades Of The Azure
80
|
Posted - 2013.11.14 21:22:00 -
[27] - Quote
Their you go RAider ^ theirs 1 of your "friends" now RAider see all the support rallying for you already. That's a alliance & full corporation just like that, need I go on? I would hope not for your.... "well being" RAider
|
Vinsarrow
New Eden Blades Of The Azure
80
|
Posted - 2013.11.14 21:31:00 -
[28] - Quote
But back on subject, CCP does need to fix this |
Vinsarrow
New Eden Blades Of The Azure
80
|
Posted - 2013.11.16 18:01:00 -
[29] - Quote
Bump |
Vinsarrow
New Eden Blades Of The Azure Zero-Day
92
|
Posted - 2013.11.22 20:01:00 -
[30] - Quote
^ True |
|
Vinsarrow
New Eden Blades Of The Azure Zero-Day
97
|
Posted - 2013.11.24 22:23:00 -
[31] - Quote
Ares 514 wrote:Kain Spero wrote:Reading through this thread I really think that until shares are implemented in Dust the shares of a Dust founded corp should be permanently assigned to the Dust CEO and Founder. At a later date if/when shares are implemented the Dust founder can then assign the shares as he pleases.
The standard MO in Eve is to create a corporation and then assign all the shares to the CEO and Founder. When a Dust corp is created in Dust this automatically done. I think the problem lies in the fact that when an Eve CEO is appointed it is undone involuntarily. If there is no desire to create a shares system in Dust then have the Dust founder be assigned the shares until such time that a system is in place for the Dust character to change their location. The Dust character can then decide themselves what to do with the shares. Exactly what I have said.
That is relatively agreeable |
Vinsarrow
New Eden Blades Of The Azure Zero-Day
120
|
Posted - 2013.12.02 19:29:00 -
[32] - Quote
That is very true it would keep people from wanting to connect to EVE if they feel EVE is favored more by CCP then Dust 514 & that EVE players know secrets we don't & that we can't fight against. Speaking of which are their any other secrets we should know of that might jepordize Dust players while we're here? |
Vinsarrow
New Eden Blades Of The Azure Zero-Day
175
|
Posted - 2014.01.13 19:48:00 -
[33] - Quote
Since CPM's are running for campaign currently this be a good time to bump this & remind people of this issue. |
Vinsarrow
New Eden Blades Of The Azure Zero-Day
175
|
Posted - 2014.01.13 20:08:00 -
[34] - Quote
Also for those reading this post for the first time please read as much of each page as possible. |
Vinsarrow
New Eden Blades Of The Azure Zero-Day
258
|
Posted - 2014.04.22 19:26:00 -
[35] - Quote
Bumping this once more before FanFest as it is still a serious issue. Anyone just reading this now this post requires to be read over in key places. |
|
|
|