| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 |
361. Mass drivers are becoming as numerious as ARs! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Yeah I kinda love the idea of the Mass Driver...as a mid-range support weapon. But it never really functions like that when I come up against folks using them. Most use it as a CQB spam machine. Kinda foolish if you ask me. Especially when you fac...
- by RydogV - at 2013.08.09 03:43:00
|
362. Mass Driver Findings (Based upon in game experience and forum posts) - in General Discussions [original thread]
Yeah I kinda love the idea of the Mass Driver...as a mid-range support weapon. But it never really functions like that when I come up against folks using them. Most use it as a CQB spam machine. Kinda foolish if you ask me. Especially when you fac...
- by RydogV - at 2013.08.09 03:43:00
|
363. How many mass drivers . . . - in General Discussions [original thread]
Yeah I kinda love the idea of the Mass Driver...as a mid-range support weapon. But it never really functions like that when I come up against folks using them. Most use it as a CQB spam machine. Kinda foolish if you ask me. Especially when you fac...
- by RydogV - at 2013.08.09 03:37:00
|
364. CCP is like a child - in General Discussions [original thread]
From 20k to 400 War Points. That is a pretty big pendulum swing IMO. The could have just dropped it down to 10k and reevaluated from there. Massive change is never the answer when you are trying to "fine-tune" something. And something tells me t...
- by RydogV - at 2013.08.08 22:29:00
|
365. Poll : Assault Rifle - in General Discussions [original thread]
I don't agree the AR is OP just overused by most players. And its overuse is not a product of superior stats either. It is a product of Map Design. Most current maps favor the strengths of the AR and its mid-range combat effectiveness. As someone ...
- by RydogV - at 2013.08.08 21:24:00
|
366. Content Vs Polish. - in General Discussions [original thread]
At this point I am content enough with Infantry Mechanics (vehicles still need work), that I am leaning on the content side. Much of the mechanics issues left infantry side are quirks that I can deal with. What I am having trouble with now, after ...
- by RydogV - at 2013.08.04 18:31:00
|
367. [Feedback/Suggestion] On Faction Warfare - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Got redirected from another thread here. Glad to see great ideas and great discussion. Curious about the Queuing System tho...being put in a wait mode sounds a lot better than spamming the button, A LOT BETTER. But how will this affect Corporatio...
- by RydogV - at 2013.08.04 18:24:00
|
368. Do you REALLY think the MD won't be nerfed?...AGAIN - in General Discussions [original thread]
No DMG nerf for the MD. But I think it falls into better balance with a slightly slower rate of fire, maybe one less round and slower reload. Add more damage to the user in CQB and MD will be fine and truly a support weapon.
- by RydogV - at 2013.08.03 02:03:00
|
369. [Request] Planetary Conquest 2.0 - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
The Black Jackal wrote: While you do make a good point, I'd argue that in a gaming world where BIGGER is better, it would be better for DUST 514 to allow MORE players onto the battlefield with larger maps. And as I've stated. Open World. Sma...
- by RydogV - at 2013.08.03 01:26:00
|
370. [Request] Planetary Conquest 2.0 - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Oso Peresoso wrote: Also, I would point out that the 16 person team doesn't have to be fielded from a single corp. Make some friends, put out some feelers. There are probably a lot of corps in that situation. Contact some of the corps with few ...
- by RydogV - at 2013.08.02 22:22:00
|
371. [Request] Planetary Conquest 2.0 - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Alabastor 'TheBlaster' Alcar wrote: how often were the old battles 8v8, couldnt u always just bring a full 16 if u had the people?? No the old Faction Warfare was strictly 8v8 battles and the only way to do corp v corp prior to PC.
- by RydogV - at 2013.08.02 21:58:00
|
372. [Request] Planetary Conquest 2.0 - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Alabastor 'TheBlaster' Alcar wrote: u do know that there is only one 3 point map right?? i think it would get really boring really fast, and as for the 8v8 i dont know about that either, what ccp needs to do is bring back corp battles, where co...
- by RydogV - at 2013.08.02 21:40:00
|
373. Sticky:We are increasing Clone Pack Amounts - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Great news. Now the next step in the chain of evolutionary change: https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=99325&find=unread
- by RydogV - at 2013.08.02 19:38:00
|
374. [Request] Planetary Conquest 2.0 - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Something I would like to see when CCP decides to further expand Planetary Conquest out of Molden Heath (or even within it) is a version of PC that might provide improved access for smaller corporations. [TL;DR]: 8v8 Matches, Smaller (3-point) M...
- by RydogV - at 2013.08.02 19:31:00
|
375. Is Dust dead? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Is Dust dead.... ....no it's just sleeping. zZzZzZzZzZzZzZz
- by RydogV - at 2013.08.01 21:46:00
|
376. [Petition] Bring back a gamemode like Skirmish 1.0 - in General Discussions [original thread]
Criteria Shipment wrote: RydogV wrote: Sure...why not? Or better yet, introduce some different objective based gamemode(s) PVE I am all for PvE. Sure bring it on. But not at the expense of new competitive MP content. Shooting drone...
- by RydogV - at 2013.08.01 21:34:00
|
377. [Petition] Bring back a gamemode like Skirmish 1.0 - in General Discussions [original thread]
Sure...why not? Or better yet, introduce some different objective based gamemode(s)
- by RydogV - at 2013.08.01 21:28:00
|
378. So i'm a Cal Logi, my suit prenerf and post nerf - in General Discussions [original thread]
J0LLY R0G3R wrote: PreNerf http://imgur.com/VAQjcOJ PostNerf http://imgur.com/wKxy6oI Shrug, "fake logi" now. Sad face for you Jolly. It used to make me giggle when you actually rep'd me Miss you Brotha' Fun thread to read. To be...
- by RydogV - at 2013.07.31 18:46:00
|
379. 10 months since a simple feature was promised: abandoned by CCP - in General Discussions [original thread]
Totally cool with no reload on the sprint. Its omission adds a certain element of combat realism even in a sci-fi game. Just adds another element of decision making for a player in the heat of battle. To reload or not reload, that is the question.
- by RydogV - at 2013.07.29 21:54:00
|
380. Que syncing...... Pathetic large corp tactic. - in General Discussions [original thread]
FUXYERMOM wrote: I also love that sever true blood and melon seem like the only people who didn't like my post. I see these corps in those matches all the time. Riddle me this....... Can you be number one alone?.... If not its your corp not you...
- by RydogV - at 2013.07.26 15:15:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |