| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 |
401. The great AV debate - in General Discussions [original thread]
Takahiro Kashuken wrote: lol its a tank you ******* idiot Of course its going to have more health ...and right here we have the problem, shown in all its glory. CCP unfortunately have to listen to people who believe that this is a valid g...
- by R F Gyro - at 2014.01.11 18:19:00
|
402. Soft lore - in General Discussions [original thread]
Arx Ardashir wrote: Soft, floppy, non-threatening lore. Soft, floppy, non-threatening lore about people getting blown to bits
- by R F Gyro - at 2014.01.11 14:42:00
|
403. The great AV debate - in General Discussions [original thread]
TheD1CK wrote: Clearly fair enough...... Heavy Attack Vehicle is the name if i'm not mistaken Why choose one line of my post to quote, taking it out of context when, I pretty much agree with you... They should do more damage (most powerful weap...
- by R F Gyro - at 2014.01.11 14:40:00
|
404. Why Shouldn't Tanks Be Soloed? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Takron Nistrom wrote: Logi Bro wrote: *sigh* This is obvious bait, yet I know other people will not recognize it as so, and this thread will blow up into a full-blown troll thread. For what it's worth, tanks should be solo'd because only o...
- by R F Gyro - at 2014.01.11 14:37:00
|
405. Soft lore - in General Discussions [original thread]
Right now players are swamped with hundreds of systems, in dozens of constellations in numerous regions, fought over by dozens of different corporations and factions. There is so much that it all gets ignored, leaving players feeling completely di...
- by R F Gyro - at 2014.01.11 14:35:00
|
406. The great AV debate - in General Discussions [original thread]
TheD1CK wrote: Tankers are the most powerful weapon in Dust.... fair enough No, not fair enough. One playstyle should not be inherently stronger than others. I'm happy for tanks to have more EHP and do more damage, but they need a significa...
- by R F Gyro - at 2014.01.11 14:29:00
|
407. Can't we just scrap Cpm? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Have you seen all the garbage in these forums? You want the devs basing their decisions entirely off that?
- by R F Gyro - at 2014.01.11 14:26:00
|
408. The great AV debate - in General Discussions [original thread]
Interesting angle on the subject. Lets go with "AV are to tanks as Snipers are to infantry" as a starting point then. So you have a battle with a few AV guys and a few Snipers, plus tanks and infantry. The AV neutralise some of the tanks. The S...
- by R F Gyro - at 2014.01.11 13:51:00
|
409. any good caldary fw channels? - in General Discussions [original thread]
https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=126743&find=unread Sticky thread, in this forum.
- by R F Gyro - at 2014.01.11 11:25:00
|
410. Some more tank rant - in General Discussions [original thread]
I suspect immobilising vehicles is somewhere on the CCP "to do" list. It won't be a high priority though.
- by R F Gyro - at 2014.01.11 10:37:00
|
411. Why Shouldn't Tanks Be Soloed? - in General Discussions [original thread]
MINA Longstrike wrote: Tanks are meant to be line breakers and highly disruptive to infantry - or to other vehicles - perhaps in some regards they're succeeding a bit too well at it but I believe the problem lies mostly in cost - increase the c...
- by R F Gyro - at 2014.01.11 10:33:00
|
412. Why Shouldn't Tanks Be Soloed? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Summ Dude wrote: I'll add that I feel like most of the AV grief comes from Swarm Launcher users. I only use the FG, and I mean, it's actually not terrible as a tank-deterrent. Of course I'll never finish one off by myself unless the tanker happ...
- by R F Gyro - at 2014.01.11 10:23:00
|
413. Why Shouldn't Tanks Be Soloed? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Summ Dude wrote: Just thought I'd pop in real quick to say: Attim, I think this is a very good question to ask. And also, I can't help but notice that no one on the anti tank nerf side has actually answered it yet. I've seen a lot of random ide...
- by R F Gyro - at 2014.01.11 09:43:00
|
414. Why Shouldn't Tanks Be Soloed? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Vulpes Dolosus wrote: Because this is a team-based game. Attackers need multiple roles to win, tanks can't hack objectives and even with the best tanks, concentrated AV threaten them. Defender's need of teamwork should be obvious. Tanks don'...
- by R F Gyro - at 2014.01.11 09:40:00
|
415. Why Shouldn't Tanks Be Soloed? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Soraya Xel wrote: R F Gyro: If you look at my version, I think having it dual mode might be a bit unnecessarily complicated. But we have the same general idea. Though my thought is that HAVs should become crew-based vehicles, since MAVs and mec...
- by R F Gyro - at 2014.01.11 09:37:00
|
416. Did anyone ever wonder WHY tanks are so cheap, suddenly? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Charlotte O'Dell wrote: Call me an optimist, but I think CCP saw this coming (tank spam) if they lowered the prices. The did so to collect a lot of data on how tanks perform- Face it: they had 2 types of tankers to get data from- newberries in ...
- by R F Gyro - at 2014.01.11 09:32:00
|
417. Did anyone ever wonder WHY tanks are so cheap, suddenly? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Atiim wrote: Charlotte O'Dell wrote: Atiim wrote: If so, then they could've taken that $#!t over by Tranquility. Forcing players to shovel 6-800k per match or get red-lined by WoT scrubs is a complete failure. But I guess we might as w...
- by R F Gyro - at 2014.01.11 09:28:00
|
418. Why Shouldn't Tanks Be Soloed? - in General Discussions [original thread]
I wasn't expecting much from this thread, but I'm pleasantly surprised to see that reason seems to be returning to this debate. I've given likes to a bunch of posts here. Quote: My personal favourite approach is for tanks to be fairly weak by ...
- by R F Gyro - at 2014.01.11 09:21:00
|
419. Who Logis the Logi? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Kigurosaka Laaksonen wrote: R F Gyro wrote: I'm a logi, and I love not having to fit reppers. I'm trying to imagine a Guardian pilot saying something like this. I'm a Guardian pilot, and all my fits are buffer/resist tanked, and hence d...
- by R F Gyro - at 2014.01.11 00:34:00
|
420. Who Logis the Logi? - in General Discussions [original thread]
I'm a logi, and I love not having to fit reppers. I'd rather have a bonus to the equipment I use though. /not signed
- by R F Gyro - at 2014.01.10 18:59:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |