| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
1841. Just figured out that JLAV's are still a thing - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Soraya Xel wrote: Simply put, because it's valid gameplay. It's not valid if it takes a **** on risk/reward balance. That would be like saying that in EVE I should be able to ram a Marauder Battleship with my Rookie ship and blow it up.
- by Pokey Dravon - at 2014.12.22 16:36:00
|
1842. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Breakin Stuff wrote: Now I know why you're obsessed with vehicles. Tank history nerd. But back on topic is the HAV revamp going to come with a balance pass on countering AV as well? It is a concern. However I think that if enforcers are th...
- by Pokey Dravon - at 2014.12.22 16:13:00
|
1843. [Suggestion] Increase Mass Driver efficacy against vehicles to 100% - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Finn Colman wrote: True Adamance wrote: I cry every time someone suggests adding more AV options, especially explosive ones, in an AV climate where there are literally half a dozen more effective anti armour options, and no one ever makes a ...
- by Pokey Dravon - at 2014.12.22 03:13:00
|
1844. breach PLC nah lets have a burst PLC - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Talon Paetznick II wrote: Pokey Dravon wrote: well it's a burst right? So all 3 shots are going to hit about the same spot anyways, especially if you're shooting at a vehicle. Are you intending this as an Anti-Personnel weapon? for the m...
- by Pokey Dravon - at 2014.12.21 07:12:00
|
1845. breach PLC nah lets have a burst PLC - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
well it's a burst right? So all 3 shots are going to hit about the same spot anyways, especially if you're shooting at a vehicle. Are you intending this as an Anti-Personnel weapon?
- by Pokey Dravon - at 2014.12.21 05:22:00
|
1846. breach PLC nah lets have a burst PLC - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
What advantages and disadvantages would this have over the normal plasma cannon? At 40% for each shot you're looking at 120% alpha damage (assuming all 3 hit) with 200% the reload speed mean there would be a significant net decrease in total DPS. ...
- by Pokey Dravon - at 2014.12.21 04:51:00
|
1847. Revamp missions to be role specific - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf wrote: Pokey Dravon wrote: When we interviewed Rattati on the Biomassed Podcast, he implied that something like this is on the roadmap. The missions we currently have are a base level that they used to roll out the syst...
- by Pokey Dravon - at 2014.12.21 00:09:00
|
1848. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
True Adamance wrote: Pokey Dravon wrote: Devadander wrote: This discussion is moot without module variety. All variants will be either hardened or bricked.... *yawn* (and of course the Scrublogi with dmg mods on his mlt rail) Max effor...
- by Pokey Dravon - at 2014.12.20 01:11:00
|
1849. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Devadander wrote: This discussion is moot without module variety. All variants will be either hardened or bricked.... *yawn* (and of course the Scrublogi with dmg mods on his mlt rail) Max effort I could drum up maybe 4 fits, but they would ...
- by Pokey Dravon - at 2014.12.19 22:25:00
|
1850. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Sir Dukey wrote: Pokey Dravon wrote: Sir Dukey wrote: well, why don't we just give all suits 0 ehp but a bunch of slots. It just doesn't make sense. There is no point in how much base HP you take away slots you give, in the end, it wil...
- by Pokey Dravon - at 2014.12.19 22:13:00
|
1851. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Sir Dukey wrote: well, why don't we just give all suits 0 ehp but a bunch of slots. It just doesn't make sense. There is no point in how much base HP you take away slots you give, in the end, it will always go toward a tank modules unless yo...
- by Pokey Dravon - at 2014.12.19 22:10:00
|
1852. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Sir Dukey wrote: Look, there is no point in choosing anything but tank ever. There is no point in anything because anything other than tank is not viable. When you see a gunnlogi- you most of the time (at least the successful ones) are running...
- by Pokey Dravon - at 2014.12.19 22:07:00
|
1853. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Sir Dukey wrote: Heavies have high HP, this allows them to choose modules other than extenders and plates. Why shouldn't this be same for HAV. Why must tanks be forced to tank, why not have scanners or CRU's or fuel injectors. I think you'r...
- by Pokey Dravon - at 2014.12.19 21:39:00
|
1854. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Spkr4theDead wrote: Pokey Dravon wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: Pokey Dravon wrote: ... Lets assume hypothetically that Standard HAVs were buffed in such a way that they performed properly against AV. Under that assumption, do Marauders n...
- by Pokey Dravon - at 2014.12.19 19:41:00
|
1855. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Lazer Fo Cused wrote: Pokey Dravon wrote: Lazer Fo Cused wrote: 3. Problem is if you make the hull base HP too low it just means you will have to use a slot for a HP module anyways That's kind of the idea. It makes the tank as good as...
- by Pokey Dravon - at 2014.12.19 19:20:00
|
1856. No Death Until Clone Termination - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Kain Spero wrote: Pokey Dravon wrote: I seem to recall a dev saying it's basically deeply hard coded that death is recorded at the point of incapacitation. Not saying its a bad idea, but I think it's a technical impossibility without extens...
- by Pokey Dravon - at 2014.12.19 19:10:00
|
1857. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
DarthJT5 wrote: We've been saying 5/2 since about 8 pages ago... But I disagree with enforcers getting an extra mod for their tank, I would rather it be the same as std(4/2) or have it gain an extra off rack mod(4/3) Spkr4theDead wrote: ...
- by Pokey Dravon - at 2014.12.19 19:02:00
|
1858. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Spkr4theDead wrote: Pokey Dravon wrote: ... Lets assume hypothetically that Standard HAVs were buffed in such a way that they performed properly against AV. Under that assumption, do Marauders need 2 additional slots on top of that? AV sh...
- by Pokey Dravon - at 2014.12.19 18:49:00
|
1859. No Death Until Clone Termination - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
I seem to recall a dev saying it's basically deeply hard coded that death is recorded at the point of incapacitation. Not saying its a bad idea, but I think it's a technical impossibility without extensive effort.
- by Pokey Dravon - at 2014.12.19 18:44:00
|
1860. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
... Lets assume hypothetically that Standard HAVs were buffed in such a way that they performed properly against AV. Under that assumption, do Marauders need 2 additional slots on top of that?
- by Pokey Dravon - at 2014.12.19 18:33:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |