| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 |
4481. AURUM may ruin player trading. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Lt Royal wrote: The only way I see the economy being borked, is from the various corporations who having already earned 150 billion + (through exploiting the unbalanced Planetary Conquest system). When the player economy is released those corps...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2013.09.10 12:20:00
|
4482. AR is way more fun than the HMG - in General Discussions [original thread]
Lurchasaurus wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: Lurchasaurus wrote: Funkmaster Whale wrote: DJINN leukoplast wrote: AR's have always been easy mode in comparison to every other weapon in the game. I thought it was Mass Drivers? And before ...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2013.09.10 12:11:00
|
4483. So how about 1.5 - in General Discussions [original thread]
Chances Ghost wrote: steadyhand amarr wrote: I would say first week of Oct. Also I would hope a new socket to go with it. A rebalance is not very motivating to play I kinda want more things to do shooters ax a whole has got boring for me. Re...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2013.09.10 12:05:00
|
4484. AR is way more fun than the HMG - in General Discussions [original thread]
Lurchasaurus wrote: Funkmaster Whale wrote: DJINN leukoplast wrote: AR's have always been easy mode in comparison to every other weapon in the game. I thought it was Mass Drivers? And before that Flaylocks... And Grenades... Or was it ...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2013.09.10 12:02:00
|
4485. Shield module Penalties - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Eris Ernaga wrote: Funny how much better armor is and people are still asking for a shield nerf? Funny I run a Carthum and even the best shield tankers get owned. How about not using a mass driver all the time and switching to something that do...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2013.09.10 11:54:00
|
4486. Nerf MD against shield tank suits. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Cosgar wrote: Explosions already have a -20% penalty to shields. Supposedly there was a bug where they did full damage, but I think it was fixed this patch. I thought the bug made it for 65% against sheilds!! And 135% to armour??
- by Monkey MAC - at 2013.09.10 11:48:00
|
4487. 2 Primary Weapon Assault Suit - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Vesago Ghostcore wrote: Is there any chance a commando type medium suit might ever be in our future? Nope, commando role is heavy for a reason!!
- by Monkey MAC - at 2013.09.10 11:39:00
|
4488. So how about 1.5 - in General Discussions [original thread]
Washlee wrote: I've heard a few things New Weapons and Many Vehicle "Improvements" Anybody hear anything else or a window for release on this patch. I have heard rumours of new vechiles to!!
- by Monkey MAC - at 2013.09.10 10:59:00
|
4489. Introducing CCP Saberwing! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Mad Mav wrote: Welcome Saber Wing! Know what this calls for?...... BACON!!!!!!! Nothing but the finest!! Welcome Saberwing, good luck!!
- by Monkey MAC - at 2013.09.10 10:38:00
|
4490. Infantry - Vehicle Treaty - in General Discussions [original thread]
True Adamance wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: Michael Arck wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: True Adamance wrote: Fact of the matter is if I can do that job better when I get out of my tank than a specced infantryman you are doing something wrong...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2013.09.10 10:33:00
|
4491. Infantry - Vehicle Treaty - in General Discussions [original thread]
True Adamance wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: True Adamance wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: True Adamance wrote: Fact of the matter is if I can do that job better when I get out of my tank than a specced infantryman you are doing something wron...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2013.09.10 10:29:00
|
4492. Infantry - Vehicle Treaty - in General Discussions [original thread]
Michael Arck wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: True Adamance wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: Some oc us do but its a big hard, when there is 100m gap with no cover!! Fact of the matter is if I can do that job better when I get out of my tank than ...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2013.09.10 10:23:00
|
4493. Infantry - Vehicle Treaty - in General Discussions [original thread]
True Adamance wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: True Adamance wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: Some oc us do but its a big hard, when there is 100m gap with no cover!! Fact of the matter is if I can do that job better when I get out of my tank than...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2013.09.10 10:14:00
|
4494. Infantry - Vehicle Treaty - in General Discussions [original thread]
ladwar wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: Some oc us do but its a big hard, when there is 100m gap with no cover!! grab a LAV or even better a dropship if you need to go that far. they are transport that use can use to well trasnport yourself over ...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2013.09.10 10:01:00
|
4495. Infantry - Vehicle Treaty - in General Discussions [original thread]
True Adamance wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: Some oc us do but its a big hard, when there is 100m gap with no cover!! Fact of the matter is if I can do that job better when I get out of my tank than a specced infantryman you are doing somethin...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2013.09.10 09:57:00
|
4496. Infantry - Vehicle Treaty - in General Discussions [original thread]
True Adamance wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: ladwar wrote: if your using a tank for cover then your doing something wrong. if you using to provide suppressive fire maybe but they are taking our unlim...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2013.09.10 09:47:00
|
4497. Infantry - Vehicle Treaty - in General Discussions [original thread]
MarasdF Loron wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: MarasdF Loron wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: ladwar wrote: if your using a tank for cover then your doing something wrong. if you using to provide suppressive fire maybe but they are taking our unl...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2013.09.10 09:40:00
|
4498. Infantry - Vehicle Treaty - in General Discussions [original thread]
MarasdF Loron wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: ladwar wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: Are LAV drivers aware sometimes, we ask you to go somewhere by shooting at it? Tanks need to be prepared to move slower whdn pushing so allied infantry can use it a...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2013.09.10 09:28:00
|
4499. Infantry - Vehicle Treaty - in General Discussions [original thread]
Spkr4theDead wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: ladwar wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: Are LAV drivers aware sometimes, we ask you to go somewhere by shooting at it? Tanks need to be prepared to move slower whdn pushing so allied infantry can use it as...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2013.09.10 09:26:00
|
4500. Shooting while sitting in a vehicle - in General Discussions [original thread]
The True Inferno wrote: I was thinking, how nice would it be if you could well, shoot from in a vehicle with your equipped weapon or rep the vehicles armour with a armour rep from inside. 1. This would make sitting in a drop-ship/LAV way more ...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2013.09.10 09:18:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |