| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 20 30 40 50 |
161. [Feedback] More feedback on CCP's anti-sniper stance. Map data included. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Jack McReady wrote: Jathniel wrote: Jack McReady wrote: Jathniel wrote: Jack McReady wrote: 90 meter is definately NOT TAC AR spot. TAC AR can deal a bit of damage at such ranges but killing someone is a different story. tac deals a...
- by Jathniel - at 2013.09.17 15:49:00
|
162. [Feedback] More feedback on CCP's anti-sniper stance. Map data included. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Monkey MAC wrote: ShinyJay wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: ShinyJay wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: Yes its not the best example, and clearly rigged. But your right my point is indeed that snipers can work at ~100m effectively, while you may have...
- by Jathniel - at 2013.09.17 15:47:00
|
163. [Feedback] More feedback on CCP's anti-sniper stance. Map data included. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Monkey MAC wrote: ShinyJay wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: Yes its not the best example, and clearly rigged. But your right my point is indeed that snipers can work at ~100m effectively, while you may have taken a guy down at 96mI doubt it would...
- by Jathniel - at 2013.09.17 15:26:00
|
164. [Feedback] More feedback on CCP's anti-sniper stance. Map data included. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Put the wrong screenshot up in the previous post. Here's the rest. http://tinypic.com/r/1zc1n53/5 Just so folks can see, you don't just use a scrambler or tac ar from that range, but you can do it efficiently. The sniper rifle on the other ...
- by Jathniel - at 2013.09.17 15:22:00
|
165. [Feedback] More feedback on CCP's anti-sniper stance. Map data included. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Monkey MAC wrote: Yes its not the best example, and clearly rigged. But your right my point is indeed that snipers can work at ~100m effectively, while you may have taken a guy down at 96mI doubt it would have been as fast as a sniper, and othe...
- by Jathniel - at 2013.09.17 15:16:00
|
166. [Feedback] More feedback on CCP's anti-sniper stance. Map data included. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Draco Cerberus wrote: I am not normally a sniper but feel that it is in need of some sort of a buff terrain wise. Some thing to hide in or behind like that cloak CCP Wolfman promised or the suggested equipment "Dragon's Teeth" would be useful f...
- by Jathniel - at 2013.09.17 15:03:00
|
167. [Feedback] More feedback on CCP's anti-sniper stance. Map data included. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Monkey MAC wrote: Jathniel wrote: Jack McReady wrote: Jathniel wrote: Jack McReady wrote: 90 meter is definately NOT TAC AR spot. TAC AR can deal a bit of damage at such ranges but killing someone is a different story. tac deals aro...
- by Jathniel - at 2013.09.17 14:50:00
|
168. [Feedback] More feedback on CCP's anti-sniper stance. Map data included. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Jack McReady wrote: Jathniel wrote: Jack McReady wrote: 90 meter is definately NOT TAC AR spot. TAC AR can deal a bit of damage at such ranges but killing someone is a different story. tac deals around 45% of its damage at 90 meters. ...
- by Jathniel - at 2013.09.17 14:22:00
|
169. [Feedback] More feedback on CCP's anti-sniper stance. Map data included. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Jack McReady wrote: 90 meter is definately NOT TAC AR spot. TAC AR can deal a bit of damage at such ranges but killing someone is a different story. tac deals around 45% of its damage at 90 meters. Well 90m is plenty fine for an Imperial Sc...
- by Jathniel - at 2013.09.17 13:30:00
|
170. [Feedback] More feedback on CCP's anti-sniper stance. Map data included. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Monkey MAC wrote: Jathniel wrote: Bendtner92 wrote: You won't be able to protect the hack point from afar, but you'll still be able to protect the area around the hack point from afar. Being sniped while hacking was always stupid and I...
- by Jathniel - at 2013.09.17 13:28:00
|
171. [Feedback] More feedback on CCP's anti-sniper stance. Map data included. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Monkey MAC wrote: Jathniel wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: Jathniel wrote: Jack McReady wrote: no more useless sniper camping on a spot far away getting 2 kills per game and do nothing else. there are plenty of good sniper spots, working a...
- by Jathniel - at 2013.09.17 13:10:00
|
172. [Feedback] More feedback on CCP's anti-sniper stance. Map data included. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Bendtner92 wrote: You won't be able to protect the hack point from afar, but you'll still be able to protect the area around the hack point from afar. Being sniped while hacking was always stupid and I'm glad they've taken steps to prevent t...
- by Jathniel - at 2013.09.17 13:04:00
|
173. [Feedback] More feedback on CCP's anti-sniper stance. Map data included. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Monkey MAC wrote: Jathniel wrote: Jack McReady wrote: no more useless sniper camping on a spot far away getting 2 kills per game and do nothing else. there are plenty of good sniper spots, working as intended. also there is something cal...
- by Jathniel - at 2013.09.17 12:46:00
|
174. [Feedback] More feedback on CCP's anti-sniper stance. Map data included. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Jack McReady wrote: no more useless sniper camping on a spot far away getting 2 kills per game and do nothing else. there are plenty of good sniper spots, working as intended. also there is something calling risk vs. reward. if you fully expec...
- by Jathniel - at 2013.09.17 12:34:00
|
175. [Feedback] More feedback on CCP's anti-sniper stance. Map data included. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Monkey MAC wrote: Who hey hey less of the monkey, I may found it easy but thats not the point!! ANYONE can do it, the old maps are risk free and open, now you might have to move into about 90m your flipping your lid!! (I refuse to let one sm...
- by Jathniel - at 2013.09.17 12:30:00
|
176. [Feedback] More feedback on CCP's anti-sniper stance. Map data included. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Kekklian Noobatronic wrote: Read your OP, it was nothing but complaining. Also, I have over 17 Million SP, heavily invested in Heavies, Logistics, AV, and Assault, with an alt at 5.5M, Full scout. I've tried sniping, and frankly I've found it *...
- by Jathniel - at 2013.09.17 12:10:00
|
177. [Feedback] More feedback on CCP's anti-sniper stance. Map data included. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Monkey MAC wrote: Sorry you havr entirely misconstrued LogicLoops intention, sniping isn't dead, your just not doing it right!! I have corp members who still use snipers to great effect on the new maps!! LogicLoop is using thr maps to return t...
- by Jathniel - at 2013.09.17 11:25:00
|
178. Your AFK fix, stinks!!! - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Unmei no Hoeru wrote: I've seen sniping decreasing a lot since the changes in the aim assist, CQC is a lot easier this patch. The fact is sniping does good only in red line (in both teams), and since the removal of the ultra high mountain in th...
- by Jathniel - at 2013.09.17 11:13:00
|
179. [Feedback] More feedback on CCP's anti-sniper stance. Map data included. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Kekklian Noobatronic wrote: Snipers are worse than Tank drivers, jesus.. An entire thread devoted to defending the following - Snipers should be allowed to Redline snipe with no penalty - Snipers should be allowed to place themselves out of re...
- by Jathniel - at 2013.09.17 11:00:00
|
180. [Feedback] More feedback on CCP's anti-sniper stance. Map data included. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
There is a lot to consider, before simply determining that it's a "bad" thing for snipers to be able to exert control over a map. It's CCP's job to gather info and determine the best course of action. How can you understand what their role is,...
- by Jathniel - at 2013.09.17 07:15:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 20 30 40 50 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |